BS ISO 48‑4:2018

BSI Standards Publication

Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic

— Determination of hardness
Part 4: Indentation hardness by durometer method (Shore hardness)
BS ISO 48‑4:2018 BRITISH STANDARD

National foreword
This British Standard is the UK implementation of ISO 48‑4:2018. It
supersedes BS ISO 7619‑1:2010, which is withdrawn.
The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical
Committee PRI/22, Testing and analysis of rubber.
A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained on
request to its secretary.
This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions
of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application.
© The British Standards Institution 2018
Published by BSI Standards Limited 2018
ISBN 978 0 580 99962 8
ICS 83.060
Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from
legal obligations.
This British Standard was published under the authority of the
Standards Policy and Strategy Committee on 31 August 2018.

Amendments/corrigenda issued since publication

Date Text affected
 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 48-4
First edition
2018‑08‑31

Rubber, vulcanized or
thermoplastic — Determination
of hardness —
Part 4:
Indentation hardness by durometer
method (Shore hardness)
Caoutchouc vulcanisé ou thermoplastique - Détermination
de la dureté —
Partie 4: Dureté par pénétration par la méthode au duromètre
(dureté Shore)

Reference number
ISO 48‑4:2018(E)

© ISO 2018
BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT

© ISO 2018, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part o f this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright o ffice
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH‑1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
[email protected]
www.iso.org

ii © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Contents Page

Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ iv
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. v
1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
4 Principle ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2
5 Choice of durometer ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
6 Apparatus ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
6.1 Durometer types A, D and AO .................................................................................................................................................... 2
6.1.1 Pressure foot ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2
6.1.2 Indentor ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
6.1.3 Indicating device .............................................................................................................................................................. 2
6.1.4 Calibrated spring ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
6.1.5 Automatic timing device (optional) ................................................................................................................ 5
6.2 Durometer type AM ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5
6.2.1 Pressure foot ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5
6.2.2 Indentor ................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
6.2.3 Indicating device .............................................................................................................................................................. 5
6.2.4 Calibrated spring ............................................................................................................................................................. 6
6.2.5 Automatic timing device (optional) ................................................................................................................ 6
6.3 Stand ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
6.4 Durometer spring force calibration ...................................................................................................................................... 6
7 Test pieces ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
7.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
7.2 Thickness ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
7.3 Surface ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
8 Conditioning and test temperature ................................................................................................................................................... 8
9 Procedure..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
9.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
9.2 Test time ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
9.3 Measurements ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
10 Calibration and checking ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8
10.1 Calibration .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
10.2 Checking using standard rubber blocks .......................................................................................................................... 9
11 Precision ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
12 Test report................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Annex A (informative) Precision ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10
Bibliography ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved iii

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non‑governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any p atent rights identi fie d du ri ng the development o f the do c ument wi l l b e i n the I ntro duc tion and/or

on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).

Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation o f the me an i ng of I SO s p e c i fic term s and e xpre s s ion s relate d to con form ity

assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO)
principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: www.iso.org/iso/
foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 45, Rubber and rubber products,
Subcommittee SC 2, Testing and analysis.
T h i s fi rs t e d ition o f I S O 4 8 ‑ 4 c ancel s and replace s ISO 7619‑1:2010 which has been technically revised.
The main changes compared to the previous edition are as follows:
— a new standard number has been given.
— in the Introduction, an explanation of the purpose of the grouping work has been added.
— in 6.3.1, the description has been improved to distinguish hand‑held instruments and on‑a‑stand
instruments more clearly.
— in Clause 8, the description for the required time for conditioning has been improved for better
understanding.
— in 9.2, the use of talcum powder has been removed.
— in Annex A, precision results from ITPs that were carried out in 1985 and 2007 have been included.
A list of all parts in the ISO 48 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.

iv © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Introduction
ISO/TC 45/SC 2 established a principle that it would be helpful for users if standards on the same subject
but covering different aspects or methods were grouped together, preferably with an introductory
guidance standard, rather than being scattered throughout the numbering system. This has been
achieved for some subjects, for example curemeters (ISO 6502) and dynamic properties (ISO 4664).

In 2017, it was decided to group standards for hardness and, subsequently, it was agreed that they
would be grouped under the ISO 48 number. The new standards together with the previously numbered
standards are listed below.

— ISO 48‑1: former ISO 18517

— ISO 48‑2: former ISO 48

— ISO 48‑3: former ISO 27588

— ISO 48‑4: former ISO 7619‑1

— ISO 48‑5: former ISO 7619‑2

— ISO 48‑6: former ISO 7267‑1

— ISO 48‑7: former ISO 7267‑2

— ISO 48‑8: former ISO 7267‑3

— ISO 48‑9: former ISO 18898

The hardness of rubber, as measured by a durometer (Shore hardness) or an IRHD pocket meter, is
determined from the response of the rubber to an applied indentation. The response is complex and
will depend on:

a) the elastic modulus of the rubber;

b) the viscoelastic properties of the rubber;

c) the thickness of the test piece;

d) the geometry of the indentor;

e) the pressure exerted;

f) the rate of increase of pressure;

g) the interval after which the hardness is recorded.

Because of these factors, it is inadvisable to relate results using a durometer (Shore hardness) directly to
IRHD values, although correlations have been established for some individual rubbers and compounds.

Durometers were originally portable hand‑held instruments that have proved to be particularly
convenient for making measurements on products. By now a lot of laboratories also use them on a stand
with a weight appl ie d to the pre s s u re fo o t i n order to i mprove pre ci s ion s ign i fic antly.

NO TE ISO 4 8 ‑2 s p e c i fie s h a rd ne s s me a s u rements fo r de ter m i n atio n o f h a rd ne s s b e twe en 10 I RH D a nd

100 IRHD. Further information on the relationship between the durometer values and IRHD values is given in
References [5][6][7] .

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved v

This page deliberately left blank
 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 48-4:2018

Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic — Determination

of hardness —
Part 4:
Indentation hardness by durometer method
(Shore hardness)
WARNING 1 — Persons using this document should be familiar with normal laboratory practice.
This document does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its
use. It is the responsibility of the user to establish appropriate safety and health practices and to
determine the applicability of any other restrictions.
WARNING 2 — Certain procedures specified in this document might involve the use or generation
of substances, or the generation of waste, that could constitute a local environmental hazard.
Reference should be made to appropriate documentation on safe handling and disposal after use.

1 Scope
This do c ument s p e ci fie s a me tho d for de term i n i ng the i ndentation h ard ne s s (S hore h ard ne s s) of

vulcanized or thermoplastic rubber using durometers with the following scales:

— the A scale for rubbers in the normal‑hardness range;
— the D scale for rubbers in the high‑hardness range;
— the AO scale for rubbers in the low‑hardness range and for cellular rubbers;
— the AM scale for thin rubber test pieces in the normal‑hardness range.

2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 48‑9, Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic — Determination of hardness — Part 9: Calibration and
verification o f hardness testers

ISO 23529, Rubber — General procedures for preparing and conditioning test pieces for physical
test methods

3 Terms and definitions

No term s and defi nition s a re l i s te d i n th i s do c u ment.

ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 1

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

4 Principle
An indentor o f specified dimensions is pressed into a test piece under a specified load and the depth o f
indentation measured. This indentation is converted to a hardness value by means o f a specified relation.

5 Choice of durometer
When using durometers, the scale should be chosen as follows:

— for values less than 20 with a type D durometer: type A;

— for values less than 20 with a type A durometer: type AO;

— for values over 90 with a type A durometer: type D;

— for thin test pieces (less than 6 mm thick): type AM.

6 Apparatus
6.1 Durometer types A, D and AO
These durometers consist o f the components specified in 6.1.1 to 6.1.5.

6.1.1 Pressure foot

The pressure foot for types A and D shall have a diameter of 18 mm ± 0,5 mm and a central hole of
diameter 3 mm ± 0,1 mm. For type AO, the pressure foot shall have a minimum area of 500 mm 2 with a
central hole of diameter 5,4 mm ± 0,2 mm. The tolerances on the dimension of the central hole and the
requirement for the size of the pressure foot only apply to instruments used on a stand.

6.1.2 Indentor
The indentor shall be formed from a hardened‑steel rod of diameter 1,25 mm ± 0,15 mm to the shape
and dimensions shown in Figure 1 for type A durometers and Figure 2 for type D durometers. Type AO
durometers shall have a round indentor with a radius of 2 ,5 mm ± 0,02 mm in accordance with Figure 3.

6.1.3 Indicating device

This is a device for allowing the extent of protrusion of the point of the indentor beyond the face of the
pressure foot to be read. It shall be calibrated directly in terms of units ranging from 0 for the maximum
protrusion of 2 ,50 mm ± 0,02 mm to 100 for zero protrusion obtained by placing the pressure foot and
indentor in firm contact with a suitable flat, hard sur face (e.g. glass).

6.1.4 Calibrated spring

This is used to apply a force, F, expressed in millinewtons, to the indentor in accordance with one of the
following formulae:

— For type A durometers:

F = 550 + 75 HA

where HA is the hardness reading taken from the type A durometer.

— For type D durometers:

2 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

F = 445 HD

where HD is the hardness reading taken from the type D durometer.

— For type AO durometers:

F = 550 + 75 HAO

where HAO is the hardness reading taken from the type AO durometer.

NOTE The rubber industry uses the term equation for the relationships herein termed formula. The term
formula is used to describe the table of ingredients in a rubber compound.

Dimension in millimetres

a The protrusion shown is valid for a reading of 0.

Figure 1 — Indentor for type A durometer

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 3

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Dimension in millimetres

a The protrusion shown is valid for a reading of 0.

Figure 2 — Indentor for type D durometer

Dimension in millimetres

a The protrusion shown is valid for a reading of 0.

Figure 3 — Indentor for type AO durometer

4 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Dimension in millimetres

a The protrusion shown is valid for a reading of 0.

Figure 4 — Indentor for type AM durometer

6.1.5 Automatic timing device (optional)

The timer shall be automatically activated when the pressure foot is in contact with the test piece and
shall indicate the end of the test time or lock the test value at its completion. Use of a timing device
for the test time improves precision. When the instrument is used on a stand, the time tolerance
shall be ±0,3 s.

6.2 Durometer type AM

T h i s durome ter con s i s ts o f the comp onents s p e ci fie d i n 6.2 .1 to 6.2 .5.

6.2.1 Pressure foot

The pressure foot shall have a diameter of 9 mm ± 0,3 mm and a central hole of diameter
1,19 mm ± 0,03 mm.

6.2.2 Indentor
The indentor shall be formed from a hardened‑steel rod of diameter 0,79 mm ± 0,025 mm to the shape
and dimensions shown in Figure 4.

6.2.3 Indicating device

This is a device for allowing the extent of protrusion of the point of the indentor beyond the face of the
pressure foot to be read. It shall be calibrated directly in terms of units ranging from 0 for the maximum
protrusion of 1,25 mm ± 0,01 mm to 100 for zero protrusion obtained by placing the pressure foot and
i ndentor i n fi rm contac t with a s u itable fl at, ha rd s ur face (e . g. gla s s) .

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 5

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

6.2.4 Calibrated spring

This is used to apply a force, F, expressed in millinewtons, to the indentor in accordance with
the formula:
F = 324 + 4,4 HAM

where HAM is the hardness reading taken from the type AM durometer.
NOTE The rubber industry uses the term equation for the relationships herein termed formula. The term
formula is used to describe the table of ingredients in a rubber compound.

6.2.5 Automatic timing device (optional)

The timer, if used, shall be automatically activated when the pressure foot is in contact with the test
piece and shall indicate the end of the test time or lock the test value at its completion. Use of a timing
device for the test time improves precision. The time tolerance shall be ±0,3 s.

6.3 Stand

6.3.1 The original concept of a durometer was a portable instrument that could be used, for example,
on a product in service. However, better precision can be expected by using a stand with a weight centred
on the axis of the indentor to apply the pressure foot to the test piece. Durometer types A, D and AO may
be used either as hand‑held instruments or mounted on a stand. Type AM durometers shall always be
mounted on a stand. Clearly, when a stand is used, the portability is lost.
NOTE As a general trend, it can be expected that the precision will follow the order:
Hand held durometer < Hand held durometer equipped with force‑calibrated hand‑grip < Durometer using a
stand < Durometer equipped with a timer and using a stand.

Precision is affected by a number of factors, including parallax error, time of load application, speed of
applying the load to the foot and orientation of the test piece. A detailed study of the reproducibility of
rubber hardness tests can be found in Reference [8] .

6.3.2 The operating stand shall be capable of supporting the pressure‑foot surface of the durometer
parallel to the test piece support table.

6.3.3 The stand shall be capable of applying the test piece to the indentor, or vice versa, without shock.
NOTE A maximum speed of 3,2 mm/s has been found to be suitable.

6.3.4 The total mass of the durometer and extra mass to overcome the spring force shall be:

— kg for types A and AO;

— kg for type D;

— kg for type AM.

6.4 Durometer spring force calibration

The force values shall be in accordance with Table 1.

6 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Table 1 — Durometer spring forces

Spring force
Indicated durometer value mN
Type AM Type A and AO Type D
0 324 550 —
10 368 1 300 4 450
20 412 2 050 8 900
30 456 2 800 13 350
40 500 3 550 17 800
50 544 4 300 22 250
60 588 5 050 26 700
70 632 5 800 31 150
80 676 6 550 35 600
90 720 7 300 40 050
100 764 8 050 44 500
Millinewtons (mN) per unit 4,4 75 445
Spring force tolerance ±8,8 ±37,5 ±222 ,5

7 Test pieces
7.1 General
Test pieces shall be prepared in accordance with ISO 23529.

7.2 Thickness
For the determination of hardness using type A, D and AO durometers, the thickness of the test piece
shall be at least 6 mm.

For the determination of hardness using type AM durometers, the thickness of the test piece shall be at
least 1,5 mm.

For sheets thinner than 6 mm and 1,5 mm (see above), the test piece may be composed of not more than
three layers, in order to obtain the necessary thickness. However, determinations made on such test
pieces might not agree with those made on single‑layer test pieces.

For comparative‑test purposes, the test pieces shall be similar.

NO TE M e a s u rements m ade on th i n te s t p ie ce s o f s o ft r ub b er wi l l b e i n fluence d b y the s upp o r t tab le a nd wi l l

give a result which is too high.

7.3 Surface
T he o ther d i men s ion s o f the te s t pie ce sha l l b e s u ffic ient to p erm it me as u rements at le as t 1 2 m m away

from any edge for types A and D, and 15 mm and 4,5 mm away from any edge for type AO and type AM,
respectively.

T he s u r face o f the te s t pie ce s ha l l b e fl at a nd p ara l lel over an are a s u fficient to p erm it the pre s s u re fo o t
to come into contact with the test piece over an area having a radius of at least 6 mm from the indentor
point for types A and D, 9 mm for type AO and 2 ,5 mm for type AM.

Satisfactory hardness determinations cannot be made on rounded, uneven or rough surfaces using
durometers. However, their use in certain specialized applications is recognized, e.g. ISO 48‑7 for the

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 7

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

determination of the hardness of rubber‑covered rolls. In such applications, the limitations to their use
shall be clearly identified.

8 Conditioning and test temperature

For all test purposes, the minimum time between vulcanization and testing shall be 16 h. Where
practical, test pieces shall be conditioned immediately before testing for a minimum period of 1 h at one
o f the standard laboratory temperatures specified in ISO 23529. The same temperature shall be used
throughout any single test or series of tests intended to be comparable.

9 Procedure
9.1 General
Place the test piece on a flat, hard, rigid sur face (e.g. glass). Apply the pressure foot to the test piece, or
vice versa, as rapidly as possible but without shock, keeping the foot parallel to the surface of the test
piece and ensuring that the indentor is normal to the rubber surface.

9.2 Test time

Apply a force in accordance with 6.3.3 and 7.3 su fficient only to obtain firm contact between the
pressure foot and the test piece and take the reading at the specified time a fter the pressure foot is
in firm contact with the test piece. The standard test time is 3 s for vulcanized rubber and 15 s for
thermoplastic rubber. Other test times may be used, provided they are stated in the test report. Rubbers
of unknown types should be treated as vulcanized.

NOTE 1 A test time of 15 s has been introduced for thermoplastic rubber because the hardness value continues
to decrease over a longer period o f time than for vulcanized rubber, this test time being the same as that specified
for plastics in ISO 868.

NOTE 2 I f a flow curve is recorded for at least 15 s (hardness every 0,1 s) for an unknown material, the
appropriate measuring time (3 s or 15 s) can be selected instead of treating it as vulcanized.

9.3 Measurements
Make three (known material) or five (unknown material) measurements o f hardness at di fferent
positions on the test piece at least 6 mm apart for types A, D and AO and at least 0,8 mm apart for type
AM, and determine the median value.

If the time interval after which each reading was taken is different from 3 s, record the individual
values of the indentation hardness together with the time interval after which each reading was taken,
and determine the median value and the maximum and minimum values obtained.

10 Calibration and checking

10.1 Calibration
The instrument shall be calibrated regularly using suitable instruments for measuring force,
indentation depth and indenter geometry in accordance with ISO 48‑9.

NOTE Abrasive material can strongly wear the indenter. Therefore, recalibration or replacement of the
indenter can be needed more often than the standard frequency.

8 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

10.2 Checking using standard rubber blocks 1)

P re s s the i n s tru ment aga i n s t a s u itable flat, ha rd s u r face (e . g. glas s) a nd adj u s t, where p o s s ible, the

reading on the scale to give a value of 100.

Continue the instrument check using a set of standard rubber blocks covering the measurement
range. All adjustments shall be made in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The set
of standard rubber blocks used shall consist of at least three reference blocks in a suitable covered
container away from light, heat, oil and grease. The reference blocks shall be recalibrated once a year,
or i f the me an va lue deviate s more th an one un it comp a re d with the cer ti fic ate o f the re ference blo cks .

The calibration of the reference blocks needs to be done with a reference measurement device of an
accredited laboratory. Instruments in regular use shall be checked at least each week against standard
rubber blocks.

11 Precision
See Annex A.

12 Test report
The test report shall include the following information:

a) sample details:

1) a full description of the sample and its origin;

2) a description of the test piece, including its thickness and, in the case of a composite test piece,
the number of layers;

b) the test method used, i.e. the reference number of this document (ISO 48‑4:2018);

c) test details:

1) the temperature of test, and the relative humidity when the hardness of the material is
dependent on the humidity;

2) the type of instrument used, including whether it was hand‑held or on a stand;

3) number of measurements;

4) the time which elapsed between the preparation of the test piece and the measurement of
its hardness;

5) details of any deviation from the standard procedure;

6) de ta i l s o f any op eration s no t s p e c i fie d i n th i s do c u ment and any i ncidents l i kely to have had an

i n fluence on the re s u lt;

d) the test result, expressed as a whole number, together with the scale used, e.g. 75 Shore A (A75);

e) the date of the test.

1) Standard rubber hardness blocks are available from a number of instrument manufacturers and accredited test
laboratories.

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 9

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Annex A
(informative)

Precision

A.1 General
Interlaboratory test programmes (ITPs) for precision evaluation for hardness tests were conducted in
1985, 2004 and 2007.
NOTE ISO/TR 9272:1986 2) was used for the ITP carried out in 1985, but ISO/TR 9272:2005 was used for the
2004 and the 2007 programmes.

A.2 ITP in 1985

A.2.1 The first ITP was organized and conducted by Statens Provningsanstalt (Sweden) in late 1985.
Cured test pieces of four rubber compounds (materials) were prepared in one laboratory and sent to all
participants. The nominal hardness values were 30, 45, 65 and 85. Thirty‑two laboratories participated
for measurement o f the Shore meter hardness. On each o f 2 days, 1 week apart, five determinations
(measurements) o f hardness were made on each compound. The median o f the five values was used as a
“test result” for the precision analysis.

A.2.2 The precision assessment is a type 1 (cured prepared test pieces circulated) and the time for
repeatability and reproducibility is on a scale of days.

A.2.3 The precision results for the Shore hardness meter are given in Table A.1.

Table A.1 — Type 1 precision for a Shore hardness meter

Within-laboratory Between laboratories
Material Average Repeatability Repeatability Reproducibili- Reproducibility
value (absolute) (relative) ty (absolute) (relative)
ra (r) b Ra (R ) b
A 32,7 2,67 8,15 6,41 19,6
B 47,2 1,65 3,49 4,80 10,2
C 65,6 1,53 2,34 2,83 4,31
D 80,2 1,64 2,04 5,19 6,46
Pooled values 56,2 1,93 3,42 5,03 8,94
a In measurement units.
b In percent of mean level.

A.3 ITP in 2004 (Precision results for the type AM durometer compared to that
of Micro IRHD testing)
A.3.1 The precision was determined for a type AM durometer. The results are given in Tables A.2 and
A.3 . Although Micro IRHD testing is not specified in this test method, the precision for Micro International

2) Withdrawn standard replaced by ISO/TR 9272:2005.

10 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Rubber Hardness Degrees (Micro IRHD) was also evaluated for the purposes of comparison. ISO 48‑2
includes the additional set of precision results for IRHD 3) .
The repeatability, or local domain precision, for each of the hardness test methods was established for
each material as the values found in Table A.2. Two individual test results (obtained by the proper use
of this document) that differ by more than the tabulated values of r (in measurement units) and (r) (in
percent) should be considered as suspect, i.e. as having come from different populations, and should
suggest that some appropriate investigative action be taken.
The reproducibility, or global domain precision, for the type AM durometer hardness test method was
established for each material as the values found in Table A.2. Two individual test results obtained in
different laboratories (by the proper use of this document) that differ by more than the tabulated values
of R (in measurement units) and (R) (in percent) should be considered as suspect, i.e. as having come
from different populations, and should suggest that some appropriate investigative action be taken.

A.3.2 A type 1 precision was evaluated (for both tests) using cured test pieces prepared from four
different rubber compounds, A, B, C and D (with a range of hardness values), supplied to each of the
six laboratories participating in the ITP. On each of two test days, two weeks apart, the following test
sequence was carried out. Three test pieces were furnished for each compound, and the median value of
five hardnes s meas urements o n each o f the three tes t p ieces was o b tained fo r each o f two o p erato rs . Fo r

each operator, the median value was selected for all three test pieces. The two median values were then
averaged to obtain a single value designated as the test result for that test day. Shore AM measurements
were made on one side of the test piece and IRHD measurements were made on the reverse side. The
precision analysis was based on test result data, i.e. two test result values per laboratory.
The ISO/TR 9272:2005 option 2 outlier treatment procedure, outlier replacement, was adopted since
the ITP had the minimum number of six participating laboratories. This option 2 procedure replaces
e ach outl ier de clare d a s s igni fic a nt with a va lue th at i s con s i s tent with the data va lue d i s tribution for
the non‑outlier data for that material. See ISO/TR 9272:2005 for the rationale behind this concept and
for other details.
The precision results as determined by this ITP may not be applied to acceptance or rejection testing for
any group of materials or products without documentation that the results of this precision evaluation
actually apply to the materials or products tested.

A.3.3 The precision results for type AM durometer measurements are given in Table A.2, with the
materials listed in order of increasing hardness. The results are given in terms of both absolute precision,
r and R, and relative precision (r) and (R). General statements for the use of the precision results are
given above.

A.3.4 The precision results for Micro IRHD testing are given in Table A.3, with the materials listed
in order of increasing hardness. The results are given in terms of both absolute precision, r and R, and
relative precision (r) and (R). General statements for the use of the precision results are given above.

A.3.5 The results of the precision analyses in Tables A.2 and A.3 indicate that there is no pronounced
trend for r or R versus hardness level over the 46 to 74 range. The repeatability parameters for the
type AM durometer [r = 0,88, (r) = 1,47] and for Micro IRHD [r = 1,14, (r) = 2,04] are reasonably similar.
However, the reproducibility of the two hardness measurement methods is substantially different: for
Shore AM, R = 5,08 and (R) = 8,98, and for IRHD, R = 2,20 and (R) = 3,85. The reproducibility parameters
R and (R) for IRHD are 43 % of the value(s) for Shore AM, indicating much better between‑laboratory
agreement for the IRHD measurements.

3) This is to ensure that optimum use is made of the results on IRHD from the ITP for ISO 7619‑1 at that time, given
that these results might otherwise be discarded. Having precision in both documents (ISO 48‑2 and ISO 48‑4) for
IRHD expands the precision knowledge base for IRHD and provides more precision information on this method.

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 11

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Table A.2 — Precision for ISO 7619-1 (current ISO 48-4) hardness — Type AM durometer
Within-laboratory Between laboratories
Material Mean Standard Repeatabili- Repeatabili- Standard Reproducibili- Reproducibili- Number of
level deviation ty (absolute) ty (relative) deviation ty (absolute) ty (relative) laboratories d
sra ra (r) b sRc Ra (R ) b
B (2) 47,9 0,276 0,772 1,61 2,32 6,5 13,57 6
C (3) 55,2 0,223 0,623 1,13 1,85 5,17 9,35 6 (1)
A (1) 62,8 0,404 1,13 1,8 1,95 5,45 8,68 6
D (4) 73,9 0,357 1 1,35 1,14 3,2 4,33 6 (1)
Average — 0,881 25 1,472 5 — 5,08 8,982 5 —
NOTE See A.3.5 for a discussion of the precision results in this table.
a In measurement units.
b In percent of mean level.
c For total between‑laboratory variation, in measurement units.
d Number of option 2 outlier laboratory replacement values given in parentheses.

Table A.3 — Precision for ISO 48 (current ISO 48-2) hardness — Micro IRHD
Within-laboratory Between laboratories
Material Mean Standard Repeatabili- Repeatabili- Standard Reproducibili- Reproducibili- Number of
level deviation ty (absolute) ty (relative) deviation ty (absolute) ty (relative) laboratories d
sra ra (r) b sRc Ra (R ) b
B (2) 45,6 0,404 1,13 2,48 0,954 2,67 5,85 6
C (3) 53,9 0,469 1,31 2,43 0,583 1,63 3,03 6 (1)
A (1) 63,7 0,605 1,7 2,66 0,728 2,04 3,2 6
D (4) 74 0,149 0,416 0,57 0,875 2,45 3,31 6 (1)
Average — 1,139 2,035 — 2,197 5 3,847 5 —
NOTE See A.3.5 for a discussion of the precision results in this table.
a In measurement units.
b In percent of mean level.
c For total between‑laboratory variation, in measurement units.
d Number of option 2 outlier laboratory replacement values given in parentheses.

A.4 ITP in 2007

A.4.1 Programme details
A.4.1.1 An ITP for the evaluation of the precision of Shore A and D as well as IRHD N, M, and L hardness
tests was conducted in 2007, using the procedures and guidelines described in ISO/TR 9272:2005.
Precision for IRHD, which are covered by ISO 48‑2, was determined for the purpose of comparison with
Shore precision. See ISO 48‑2 for more details on hardness testing using IRHD test methods.

A.4.1.2 A type 1 precision was evaluated, using cured test pieces prepared from seven different
reference materials or compounds (RM) designated as RM 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126 and 128. These
materials had a range of hardness levels from low to high. See the actual precision tables (Tables A.4 and
A.5) for the actual hardness levels with Shore A and Shore D test methods.

12 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

A.4.1.3 The number of laboratories volunteering to participate was as follows: 26 laboratories for‑
Shore A; 18 laboratories for Shore D.
However, some of the laboratories that initially volunteered did not participate in the testing. The
number of laboratories on which each type of hardness method is based is given in the tables of
precision results (Tables A.4 and A.5). The number of participating laboratories as noted in these tables
i s the fi na l nu mb er a fter cer tai n l ab orator y va lue s were dele te d a s outl iers (for e ach o f the five d i fferent

types of test) using the procedures as given in ISO/TR 9272:2005.

A.4.1.4 For each RM or compound and for each laboratory, two test pieces (designated as a and b) were
furnis hed and five hardnes s meas urements were made o n each o f the two tes t p ieces o n each o f two tes t

days (Monday and Friday) in a given test week. This process was repeated on alternating test weeks for a
total of four “test” weeks that covered a total time span of eight calendar weeks.

A.4.1.5 Fo r each o f the two data s ets (a and b p ieces ) o f five meas urements each day (o f each week) ,

a median value was selected. The two median values (a and b) for each test day were then averaged to
obtain a single value designated as the “combined test result” value for any given test day and test week.
Statistical analysis for precision was then conducted on each of these day 1 and day 2 “pooled combined
test result” values. A separate precision analysis was conducted for each of the four test weeks and to
generate the final p recis io n tab les , the p recis io n p arameters ( r, R , etc.) were averaged to obtain a pooled

precision parameter, i.e. an all‑four‑week value.

A.4.1.6 The participating laboratories were encouraged to use two equally competent operators (if
available) for this ITP: Operator 1 for test weeks 1 and 3 and Operator 2 for test weeks 2 and 4. The
decision to use different test pieces and different operators as well as the use of four test weeks was
b as ed o n the des ire to include s uch no rmal variatio n s o urces in the final o r p o o led co mb ined datab as e.

Thus the precision values, as listed in Tables A.4 and A.5, represent more reliable or realistic values
compared to the usual ITP results which constitute a “single point in time” estimate of precision.

A.4.1.7 The precision results as determined by this ITP should not be applied to acceptance or rejection
testing for any group of materials or products without documentation that the results of this precision
evaluation actually apply to the products or materials tested.

A.4.2 Precision results

A.4.2.1 The precision results for Shore hardness tests obtained for the 2007 ITP are given in Tables A.4
and A.5 and the ones for IRHD hardness tests are given in ISO 48‑2. Precision is given for Shore A in
Table A.4 and precision for Shore D in Table A.5. The results are given in terms of both the absolute
precision, r or R, and the relative precision, (r) and (R).

A.4.2.2 The precision results showed that the precision of IRHD N was substantially better than
IRHD M. IRHD L appeared to be roughly equivalent to IRHD N but caution was advised since the IRHD L
precision was based on only four laboratories. IRHD N precision was essentially equal to Shore A, but
Shore D precision was the worst of all methods.

A.4.2.3 Bias is the difference between a measured average test result and a reference or true value
for the measurement in question. Reference values do not exist for this test method and therefore bias
cannot be evaluated.

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 13

BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Table A.4 — Precision data for the Shore A test method

Within-laboratory Between laboratories
Material Mean Standard Repeatability Repeatability Standard Repeatability Repeatability Number of
level deviation (absolute) (relative) deviation (absolute) (relative) laboratories d
s ra ra (r) b sRc Ra (R ) b
RM 122 35,6 0,199 0,560 1,57 0,613 1,72 4,83 19
RM 124 57,5 0,263 0,720 1,28 0,720 2 ,02 3,51 20
RM 126 79,3 0,473 1,320 1,67 0,821 2 ,30 2 ,90 20
Average e 0,312 0,867 1,51 0,718 2 ,01 3,75
a In measurement units.
b In percent of mean level.
c For total between‑laboratory variation, in measurement units.
d Average number of laboratories after outliers have been deleted.
e Simple mean values for comparison.

Table A.5 — Precision data for the Shore D test method

Within-laboratory Between laboratories
Material Mean Standard Repeatability Repeatability Standard Repeatability Repeatability Number of
level deviation (absolute) (relative) deviation (absolute) (relative) laboratories d
s ra ra (r) b sRc Ra (R ) b
RM 126 24,4 0,369 1,030 4,22 0,756 2 ,12 8,66 15
RM 128 43,4 0,617 1,730 3,98 1,040 2 ,92 6,73 14
Average e 0,493 1,380 4,10 0,898 2 ,52 7,70
a In measurement units.
b In percent of mean level.
c For total between‑laboratory variation, in measurement units.
d Average number of laboratories after outliers have been deleted.
e Simple mean values for comparison.

14 © ISO 2018 – All rights reserved

 BS ISO 48‑4:2018
ISO 48-4:2018

Bibliography

[1] Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic — Determination of hardness — Part 2: Hardness

ISO 48‑2 ,
between 10 IRHD and 100 IRHD
[2] ISO 48‑7, Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic — Determination of hardness — Part 7: Apparent
hardness of rubber-covered rollers by Shore-type durometer method
[3] ISO 868, Plastics and ebonite — Determination of indentation hardness by means of a durometer
(Shore hardness)
[4] ISO/TR 9272:2005, Rubber and rubber products — Determination of precision for test
method standards
[5] B rown , R.P. , Physical testing of rubber, Chapman and Hall, London, 2006
[6] O berto , S. , Rubber Chemistry Technology, 1955, 28, 1054
[7] J uve , A.E. , Rubber Chemistry Technology, 1957, 30, 367
[8] B rown , R.P. , Polymer Testing, 1991, 10, 117

© ISO 2018 – All rights reserved 15

NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW

British Standards Institution (BSI)

BSI is the national body responsible for preparing British Standards and other
standards-related publications, information and services.
BSI is incorporated by Royal Charter. British Standards and other standardization
products are published by BSI Standards Limited.

About us Reproducing extracts

We bring together business, industry, government, consumers, innovators For permission to reproduce content from BSI publications contact the BSI
and others to shape their combined experience and expertise into standards Copyright & Licensing team.
-based solutions.
The knowledge embodied in our standards has been carefully assembled in Subscriptions
a dependable format and ref ned through our open consultation process. Our range of subscription services are designed to make using standards
Organizations of all sizes and across all sectors choose standards to help easier for you. For further information on our subscription products go to
them achieve their goals. bsigroup.com/subscriptions.
With British Standards Online (BSOL) you’ll have instant access to over 55,000
Information on standards British and adopted European and international standards from your desktop.
We can provide you with the knowledge that your organization needs It’s available 24/7 and is refreshed daily so you’ll always be up to date.
to succeed. Find out more about British Standards by visiting our website at You can keep in touch with standards developments and receive substantial
bsigroup.com/standards or contacting our Customer Services team or discounts on the purchase price of standards, both in single copy and subscription
Knowledge Centre. format, by becoming a BSI Subscribing Member.

Buying standards PLUS is an updating service exclusive to BSI Subscribing Members. You will
automatically receive the latest hard copy of your standards when they’re
You can buy and download PDF versions of BSI publications, including British revised or replaced.
and adopted European and international standards, through our website at
bsigroup.com/shop, where hard copies can also be purchased. To f nd out more about becoming a BSI Subscribing Member and the benef ts
of membership, please visit bsigroup.com/shop.
If you need international and foreign standards from other Standards Development
Organizations, hard copies can be ordered from our Customer Services team. With a Multi-User Network Licence (MUNL) you are able to host standards
publications on your intranet. Licences can cover as few or as many users as you
Copyright in BSI publications wish. With updates supplied as soon as they’re available, you can be sure your
documentation is current. For further information, email [email protected].
All the content in BSI publications, including British Standards, is the property
of and copyrighted by BSI or some person or entity that owns copyright in the
information used (such as the international standardization bodies) and has
Revisions
formally licensed such information to BSI for commercial publication and use. Our British Standards and other publications are updated by amendment or revision.

Save for the provisions below, you may not transfer, share or disseminate any We continually improve the quality of our products and services to benef t your
portion of the standard to any other person. You may not adapt, distribute, business. If you f nd an inaccuracy or ambiguity within a British Standard or other
commercially exploit, or publicly display the standard or any portion thereof in any BSI publication please inform the Knowledge Centre.
manner whatsoever without BSI’s prior written consent.
Useful Contacts
Storing and using standards Customer Services
Standards purchased in soft copy format: Tel: +44 345 086 9001
• A British Standard purchased in soft copy format is licensed to a sole named Email (orders): orders@bsigroup. com
user for personal or internal company use only. Email (enquiries): cservices@bsigroup. com
• The standard may be stored on more than 1 device provided that it is accessible Subscriptions
by the sole named user only and that only 1 copy is accessed at any one time. Tel: +44 345 086 9001
• A single paper copy may be printed for personal or internal company use only. Email: subscriptions@bsigroup. com
• Standards purchased in hard copy format:
Knowledge Centre
• A British Standard purchased in hard copy format is for personal or internal Tel: +44 20 8996 7004
company use only.
Email: knowledgecentre@bsigroup. com
• It may not be further reproduced – in any format – to create an additional copy.
This includes scanning of the document. Copyright & Licensing
If you need more than 1 copy of the document, or if you wish to share the Tel: +44 20 8996 7070
document on an internal network, you can save money by choosing a subscription Email: copyright@bsigroup. com
product (see ‘Subscriptions’).
BSI Group Headquarters
389 Chiswick High Road London W4 4AL UK

This page deliberately left blank