1

INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PRICING

Meaning, Concept and Definition of International Transfer Pricing
International transfer pricing refers to the pricing of goods, services, and intangible
assets transferred between related entities within multinational enterprises (MNEs)
operating in different tax jurisdictions. It involves determining the appropriate
prices or charges for intra-group transactions to allocate profits fairly among
different entities and ensure compliance with tax regulations.
Conceptually, transfer pricing is based on the arm's length principle, which
suggests that the prices or charges for intra-group transactions should be set as if
the entities involved were independent parties dealing at arm's length. This means
that the prices should be comparable to what unrelated entities would agree upon
under similar circumstances in an open market.
The concept of transfer pricing becomes crucial due to the potential for MNEs to
manipulate prices within their affiliated entities to shift profits to low-tax
jurisdictions, leading to base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). This can be
achieved by overvaluing or undervaluing intra-group transactions, resulting in
either excessive profits or artificial losses in certain jurisdictions.
To prevent such profit shifting and ensure the appropriate taxation of multinational
operations, tax authorities require MNEs to document and substantiate the arm's
length nature of their intra-group transactions. This documentation typically
includes transfer pricing studies, benchmarking analysis, and supporting
documentation to demonstrate compliance with the arm's length principle.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides
guidelines and recommendations on transfer pricing practices through its Transfer
Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. These
guidelines offer a framework for determining transfer prices, conducting
comparability analyses, and addressing specific transfer pricing issues such as
intangible property, intra-group services, and cost-sharing arrangements.
Furthermore, countries may have their own transfer pricing regulations based on
OECD guidelines or tailored to their specific domestic tax laws. These regulations
outline the documentation requirements, methodologies for determining arm's
length prices, penalties for non-compliance, and mechanisms for resolving transfer
pricing disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities.
 2

In summary, international transfer pricing involves establishing and documenting

the prices or charges for transactions between related entities within MNEs. The
goal is to ensure that profits are allocated appropriately and that the transactions
reflect the arm's length principle. Compliance with transfer pricing regulations is
essential to avoid tax controversies, penalties, and the risk of double taxation.
The purpose of transfer pricing regulations and guidelines is to ensure that
transactions between related entities are conducted on an arm's length basis. This
means that the prices or terms of the transactions should be determined as if the
entities were unrelated and dealing at arm's length. By doing so, transfer pricing
rules aim to prevent the shifting of profits across jurisdictions to exploit differences
in tax rates and minimize the potential for tax avoidance or base erosion.
International transfer pricing is a complex area of taxation, as it involves
considerations such as:
1. Comparability: Determining the arm's length price requires comparing the
controlled transaction to uncontrolled transactions between unrelated parties
that are similar in terms of characteristics such as functions performed, risks
assumed, and market conditions.
2. Transfer Pricing Methods: Various methods are used to determine the arm's
length price, including the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method,
Resale Price Method (RPM), Cost Plus Method (CPM), Transactional Net
Margin Method (TNMM), and Profit Split Method (PSM). The selection of
the most appropriate method depends on the nature of the transaction and the
availability of reliable data.
3. Documentation and Compliance: Many countries require taxpayers to
maintain detailed transfer pricing documentation to demonstrate that their
intercompany transactions comply with the arm's length principle. This
documentation typically includes information on the selection of transfer
pricing methods, analysis of comparables, and economic analysis supporting
the transfer pricing policies.
4. Transfer Pricing Adjustments and Disputes: Tax authorities have the power
to make transfer pricing adjustments if they determine that the prices
charged in controlled transactions do not meet the arm's length standard.
Disputes can arise between taxpayers and tax authorities regarding the
 3

appropriate transfer pricing methodology or the interpretation of the arm's

length principle.
International transfer pricing is an important area of focus for tax authorities
around the world. Countries have implemented specific legislation and regulations
aligned with international standards, such as the OECD Transfer Pricing
Guidelines, to ensure consistency and fairness in the taxation of cross-border
transactions. Compliance with transfer pricing rules is essential for multinational
enterprises to manage their tax risks, maintain good relationships with tax
authorities, and ensure the avoidance of penalties or disputes related to transfer
pricing.
Purpose and Objectives of International Transfer Pricing
The purpose and objectives of international transfer pricing are designed to achieve
fairness, transparency, and efficiency in the taxation of multinational enterprises
(MNEs) operating across different tax jurisdictions. The key purposes and
objectives include:
1. Fair Profit Allocation: The primary purpose of international transfer pricing
is to ensure the fair allocation of profits among different entities within an
MNE. By setting transfer prices based on the arm's length principle, the aim
is to reflect the economic contributions, risks, and functions performed by
each entity. This helps prevent the shifting of profits to low-tax jurisdictions
and ensures that profits are allocated in a manner that reflects the value
created by each entity.
2. Prevention of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS): Another important
objective of transfer pricing is to prevent BEPS, which refers to aggressive
tax planning strategies employed by MNEs to exploit gaps and mismatches
in tax rules, leading to the erosion of the tax base in certain jurisdictions. By
establishing transfer prices that are consistent with market conditions,
transfer pricing regulations help mitigate the risk of profit manipulation and
ensure that taxable profits are appropriately captured where economic
activities occur.
3. Avoidance of Double Taxation: International transfer pricing aims to avoid
double taxation, where the same income is subject to taxation in multiple
jurisdictions. By determining arm's length prices for intra-group
transactions, transfer pricing rules help allocate taxable income among
 4

different jurisdictions, ensuring that each jurisdiction taxes its fair share
without overlapping taxation. This objective promotes tax certainty, reduces
compliance burdens, and facilitates cross-border business activities.
4. Compliance with Tax Regulations: International transfer pricing regulations
aim to promote compliance with tax laws and regulations. MNEs are
required to maintain proper documentation, conduct transfer pricing studies,
and demonstrate that their transfer pricing arrangements are in line with the
arm's length principle. Compliance helps foster transparency, reduces the
risk of tax controversies and penalties, and enhances cooperation between
taxpayers and tax authorities.
5. Enhanced Tax Transparency and Cooperation: Transfer pricing regulations
contribute to enhancing tax transparency and fostering cooperation between
tax authorities. Through the exchange of information and collaboration
among countries, transfer pricing rules help address transfer pricing issues,
prevent tax avoidance, and combat harmful tax practices. This objective
promotes a level playing field, reduces tax disputes, and strengthens
international tax cooperation.
6. Efficient Resource Allocation and Business Decision-Making: Effective
transfer pricing practices enable MNEs to make informed business decisions
and allocate resources efficiently. By accurately reflecting costs, risks, and
contributions of different entities in transfer pricing arrangements, MNEs
can optimize their operations, pricing strategies, and investment decisions.
This objective promotes efficient allocation of resources within MNEs,
contributing to overall business performance and competitiveness.
In summary, the purpose and objectives of international transfer pricing encompass
fair profit allocation, prevention of base erosion and profit shifting, avoidance of
double taxation, compliance with tax regulations, tax transparency, and efficient
business decision-making. By achieving these objectives, transfer pricing rules
seek to establish a balanced and transparent taxation framework for MNEs
operating in a globalized economy.

Significance of International Transfer Pricing

 5

The significance of international transfer pricing lies in its impact on multinational

enterprises (MNEs), tax jurisdictions, and the global economy. Here are some key
aspects highlighting the significance of international transfer pricing:
1. Fair Allocation of Profits: International transfer pricing ensures the fair
allocation of profits among different entities within an MNE operating in
multiple tax jurisdictions. By setting transfer prices in line with the arm's
length principle, the profits generated from intra-group transactions are
appropriately distributed, reflecting the economic contributions and risks
assumed by each entity.
2. Avoidance of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS): Transfer pricing is a
critical tool in preventing BEPS, which refers to the aggressive tax planning
strategies used by MNEs to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions or exploit
mismatches in tax rules. By ensuring that prices are set at arm's length,
transfer pricing helps mitigate the risk of profit manipulation and ensures
that taxes are paid where economic activities occur.
3. Tax Revenue and Fiscal Stability: International transfer pricing has
significant implications for tax revenues and fiscal stability in different
jurisdictions. Properly assessing and taxing intra-group transactions based
on their arm's length prices helps tax authorities capture the appropriate
share of taxable income. This strengthens the tax base, enhances tax
revenues, and contributes to the fiscal stability of countries.
4. Avoidance of Double Taxation: Transfer pricing plays a crucial role in
avoiding double taxation, where the same income is subject to taxation in
multiple jurisdictions. By following the arm's length principle, MNEs can
determine the appropriate allocation of taxable income, ensuring that each
jurisdiction taxes its fair share without overlapping taxation.
5. Compliance and Avoidance of Penalties: Compliance with transfer pricing
regulations is essential for MNEs to avoid penalties, audits, and disputes
with tax authorities. By maintaining proper documentation, conducting
transfer pricing studies, and adhering to the arm's length principle, MNEs
can demonstrate transparency and compliance with tax regulations, reducing
the risk of tax controversies and penalties.
6. Enhanced Business Efficiency and Decision-Making: Effective transfer
pricing practices can contribute to improved business efficiency and
 6

decision-making within MNEs. By accurately reflecting the costs, risks, and

contributions of different entities in the transfer pricing arrangements, MNEs
can make informed decisions regarding resource allocation, pricing
strategies, and investment planning.
7. Harmonization and International Cooperation: Transfer pricing serves as a
focal point for harmonization and international cooperation in tax matters.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
provides guidelines and recommendations on transfer pricing, promoting
consistent practices and reducing conflicts between countries. The exchange
of information and cooperation among tax authorities help address transfer
pricing issues, promote transparency, and combat tax avoidance.
Overall, the significance of international transfer pricing lies in its role in ensuring
fair profit allocation, preventing base erosion and profit shifting, avoiding double
taxation, and contributing to fiscal stability. Compliance with transfer pricing
regulations helps maintain transparency, reduce tax controversies, and foster
international cooperation in tax matters.
INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PRICING: COMPLICATING
VARIABLES
International transfer pricing is a complex area of taxation that involves various
complicating variables. These variables can significantly impact the determination
of arm's length prices and create challenges for multinational enterprises (MNEs)
and tax authorities. Here are some of the complicating variables in international
transfer pricing:
1. Multinational Operations: MNEs often operate in multiple jurisdictions,
each with its own tax laws, regulations, and compliance requirements. The
diverse legal and regulatory frameworks add complexity to transfer pricing,
as MNEs must navigate different rules when setting transfer prices for their
intra-group transactions.
2. Diverse Business Models: MNEs can have diverse business models,
involving various types of transactions, such as the transfer of tangible
goods, provision of services, use of intangible assets, or financial
arrangements. Each type of transaction presents unique challenges in
determining arm's length prices, as different methodologies and
comparability factors may apply.
 7

3. Intangible Property: The valuation and transfer pricing of intangible assets,

such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, and know-how, pose particular
challenges. Determining the appropriate pricing for the use, transfer, or
licensing of intangible property requires careful analysis of factors like
economic ownership, contributions, and the market value of intellectual
property.
4. Comparability Analysis: Establishing arm's length prices relies on
comparing the controlled transaction with uncontrolled transactions between
independent parties. However, finding comparable transactions can be
challenging due to differences in products, markets, industry-specific
factors, and contractual terms. Selecting appropriate comparables and
making necessary adjustments can be complex and subjective.
5. Transfer Pricing Methods: Various transfer pricing methods can be used to
determine arm's length prices, including the comparable uncontrolled price
(CUP) method, resale price method (RPM), cost-plus method (CPM),
transactional net margin method (TNMM), and profit split method.
Choosing the most appropriate method requires a thorough understanding of
the transactional circumstances and the availability of reliable data.
6. Documentation Requirements: Tax authorities typically require MNEs to
maintain comprehensive documentation supporting their transfer pricing
positions. This documentation includes transfer pricing studies, economic
analyses, functional analyses, and comparable data. Meeting documentation
requirements can be time-consuming and resource-intensive for MNEs,
especially when dealing with complex transactions or multiple jurisdictions.
7. Compliance and Audits: The complexities of international transfer pricing
increase the risk of non-compliance and the likelihood of tax audits by tax
authorities. Audits may involve extensive information requests, data
analysis, and discussions with tax authorities to justify transfer pricing
policies and practices. Resolving disputes and reaching an agreement on
appropriate transfer prices can be challenging and time-consuming.
8. Evolving Regulations and Standards: Transfer pricing regulations and
standards continue to evolve, driven by the efforts of tax authorities and
international organizations to address BEPS. MNEs must stay updated on
changes in transfer pricing regulations and guidance issued by organizations
 8

such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

(OECD) to ensure compliance and avoid potential controversies.
Addressing these complicating variables requires careful analysis, professional
expertise, and collaboration between MNEs and tax authorities. Engaging transfer
pricing specialists, conducting robust economic analyses, maintaining accurate
documentation, and keeping abreast of regulatory developments are essential for
managing the complexities associated with international transfer pricing
effectively.
Tax Considerations
Unless counteracted by law, corporate profits can be increased by setting transfer
prices so as to move profits from subsidiaries domiciled in high-tax countries to
subsidiaries domiciled in low-tax countries.
Tariff Considerations
Tariffs on imported goods also affect the transfer pricing policies of multinational
companies. For example, a company exporting goods to a subsidiary domiciled in
a high-tariff country can reduce the tariff assessment by lowering the prices of
merchandise sent there.
Competitive Factors
To facilitate the establishment of a foreign subsidiary abroad, a parent company
could supply the subsidiary with inputs invoiced at very low prices. These price
subsidies could be removed gradually as the foreign affiliate strengthens its
position in the foreign market. Similarly, lower transfer prices could be used to
shield an existing operation from the effects of increased foreign competition in the
local market or another market; in other words, profits earned in one country could
subsidize the penetration of another market. Indirect competitive effects are also
possible. To improve a foreign subsidiary’s access to local capital markets, setting
low transfer prices on its inputs and high transfer prices on its outputs could bolster
its reported earnings and financial position.
Environmental Risks
Whereas competitive considerations abroad might warrant charging low transfer
prices to foreign subsidiaries, the risks of severe price inflation might call for the
opposite. Inflation erodes the purchasing power of a firm’s cash. High transfer
 9

prices on goods or services provided to a subsidiary facing high inflation can

remove as much cash from the subsidiary as possible.
Performance Evaluation Considerations
Transfer pricing policies are also affected by their impact on managerial behavior,
and are often a major determinant of corporate performance. For example, if a
foreign affiliate’s mission is to furnish supplies for the rest of the corporate system,
appropriate transfer prices enable corporate management to provide the affiliate
with an earnings stream that can be used in performance comparisons.
Resolving Trade-Offs
Management accountants can play a significant role in quantifying the trade-offs in
transfer pricing strategy. The challenge is to keep a global perspective when
mapping out the benefits and costs associated with a transfer pricing decision. The
effects of the decision on the corporate system as a whole must come first.

TRANSFER PRICING METHODOLOGY

Transfer pricing methodologies are used to determine the appropriate arm's length
prices for transactions between related entities within multinational enterprises
(MNEs). These methodologies provide a framework for analyzing and establishing
transfer prices that align with market conditions and comply with transfer pricing
regulations. Here are some commonly used transfer pricing methodologies:
1. Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method: The CUP method compares
the price charged for a controlled transaction with the price charged for a
comparable transaction between independent parties. This method is based
on the principle that the prices in controlled and uncontrolled transactions
should be similar if the economic conditions and circumstances are
comparable.
2. Resale Price Method (RPM): The RPM compares the resale price of a
product or service by a related party with the gross margin earned on the
resale of comparable products or services by independent parties. It focuses
on the resale margin rather than the full sales price, allowing for adjustments
related to functional and economic differences.
 10

3. Cost Plus Method (CPM): The CPM determines the arm's length price by
adding an appropriate mark-up (profit margin) to the cost incurred by the
seller in producing or acquiring the goods, services, or intangible property
transferred to related parties. The mark-up is typically based on comparable
transactions between independent parties.
4. Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM): The TNMM compares the net
profit margin realized in a controlled transaction with the net profit margin
earned in comparable uncontrolled transactions or by comparable
independent enterprises. It focuses on the profitability of the tested party
relative to an appropriate base, such as costs, sales, or assets.
5. Profit Split Method: The profit split method allocates profits between related
parties based on the division of the combined profits that they would have
expected to realize from engaging in a transaction under comparable
conditions. This method is often used when multiple parties contribute
unique and valuable contributions to a transaction or when it is difficult to
identify comparable transactions.
6. Transactional Profit Split Method: The transactional profit split method
focuses on the division of profits derived from a specific controlled
transaction. It considers the contribution of each party, such as functions
performed, assets used, and risks assumed, and allocates the profits based on
the relative value of these contributions.
7. Other Methods and Approaches: In addition to the above methods, there are
alternative approaches and methods that may be used in specific
circumstances. These include the residual profit split method, the
comparable profits method, and the profit-based methods that rely on
economic and financial indicators.
The selection of the most appropriate transfer pricing method depends on several
factors, including the availability and reliability of data, the nature of the controlled
transaction, the industry-specific considerations, and the comparability of
transactions and entities involved. It is important to apply the most suitable method
in a manner that meets the arm's length principle and complies with the applicable
transfer pricing regulations and guidelines.
Market vs. Cost-based Transfer Pricing Methods
 11

Market-based transfer pricing and cost-based transfer pricing are two approaches
used by multinational corporations to determine the price at which goods or
services are transferred between different entities within the organization. Let's
explore each method in more detail:
1. Market-based transfer pricing: Market-based transfer pricing, also known as
"arm's length pricing," involves setting transfer prices based on the
prevailing market conditions for similar goods or services. In this method,
companies determine the transfer price by examining prices in external
markets for comparable products or services provided by unrelated third
parties.
Advantages of market-based transfer pricing:
 Reflects the actual market conditions: By using external market prices, this
method ensures that transfer prices align with the prices that would prevail
in an open market.
 Encourages efficiency and competitiveness: Market-based transfer pricing
incentivizes entities within the organization to operate efficiently and
competitively to secure market prices for their goods or services.
 Minimizes transfer pricing disputes: As market-based prices are based on
independent market transactions, it reduces the potential for transfer pricing
disputes with tax authorities.
Disadvantages of market-based transfer pricing:
 Lack of internal considerations: This method may not consider the unique
cost structures, economies of scale, or strategic considerations within the
organization.
 Limited availability of market data: It may be challenging to find perfect
market comparables, especially for specialized products or services, which
can lead to uncertainty in pricing decisions.
 Susceptibility to market distortions: In volatile or illiquid markets, market-
based transfer pricing may not accurately reflect the true value of the
transferred goods or services.
2. Cost-based transfer pricing: Cost-based transfer pricing involves setting the
transfer price based on the cost of production incurred by the supplying
 12

entity, typically with an added profit margin. This method considers the
actual costs incurred by the supplying entity, including direct costs (e.g.,
materials, labor) and indirect costs (e.g., overhead, administrative expenses).
Advantages of cost-based transfer pricing:
 Simplicity and ease of calculation: Cost-based transfer pricing is relatively
straightforward to calculate, as it relies on readily available cost data.
 Internal consistency: This method ensures that the transfer price reflects the
actual costs incurred within the organization.
 Aligns with performance evaluation: Cost-based transfer pricing may align
with internal performance evaluation metrics, such as cost control and
efficiency.
Disadvantages of cost-based transfer pricing:
 May not reflect market realities: Cost-based transfer pricing does not
consider market conditions or competitive dynamics, potentially leading to
suboptimal pricing decisions.
 Lack of profit incentives: As transfer prices are determined solely based on
costs, entities within the organization may not be motivated to operate
efficiently or strive for profitability.
 Potential for cost manipulation: Cost-based transfer pricing may be
susceptible to cost manipulation by supplying entities to influence transfer
prices and allocate profits within the organization.
In practice, multinational corporations often employ a combination of market-
based and cost-based transfer pricing methods, taking into account both external
market conditions and internal cost structures to arrive at a reasonable transfer
price that aligns with both tax regulations and the organization's overall objectives.
The OECD identifies several broad methods of ascertaining an arm’s-length
price. Explain these methods

The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) provides

guidelines for determining an arm's-length price, which refers to the price that
would be set between two unrelated parties in a commercial transaction. These
guidelines are designed to ensure that multinational enterprises establish transfer
 13

prices for their intercompany transactions in accordance with the arm's-length

principle. The methods outlined by the OECD, which are similar to those specified
in Section 482 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, include:
1. Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method (CUP): The CUP method compares
the price charged for a controlled transaction with the price charged for a
comparable transaction between unrelated parties under similar
circumstances. This method relies on finding similar transactions in external
markets and using them as a benchmark for setting the transfer price.
2. Comparable Uncontrolled Transaction Method (CUT): The CUT method
compares the terms and conditions of a controlled transaction with those of a
comparable transaction between unrelated parties. It focuses on the
contractual terms and conditions rather than the price itself.
3. Resale Price Method (RPM): The RPM starts with the resale price of a
product or service and deducts an appropriate gross margin to determine the
arm's-length price. This method is commonly used when the selling entity
does not add significant value to the product or service.
4. Cost Plus Method (CPM): The CPM involves adding an appropriate markup
to the cost incurred by the supplying entity to determine the arm's-length
price. The markup typically represents a reasonable profit margin based on
the functions performed, risks assumed, and assets employed in the
controlled transaction.
5. Comparable Profit Method (CPM): The CPM compares the operating profit
margin derived from a controlled transaction with the profit margins earned
by unrelated parties engaged in comparable transactions. It focuses on the
profitability of the controlled entity in relation to similar companies in the
market.
6. Profit Split Method (PSM): The PSM allocates profits between associated
enterprises based on an analysis of the relative contributions made by each
party to the overall transaction. It seeks to divide the profits in a manner that
reflects the division of economically significant risks and functions between
the entities.
7. Other Methods: The OECD guidelines also recognize the use of other
methods that can be applied if the above methods are not feasible or do not
provide a reliable measure of an arm's-length price. These methods should
 14

still be consistent with the arm's-length principle and be supported by

accurate and reliable data.
It's important to note that the selection of the most appropriate method depends on
the specific circumstances of each controlled transaction and the availability of
reliable data. Multinational enterprises should choose the method that provides the
most accurate and reliable measure of an arm's-length price, while considering the
comparability of transactions, functions performed, and risks assumed by the
associated enterprises.

What is tax neutrality? Are taxes neutral with regard to business decisions? Is
this good or bad?
Tax neutrality refers to the idea that taxes should not unduly influence economic or
business decisions. In a neutral tax system, the tax burden is designed in a way that
does not favor or discourage specific economic activities or distort market
outcomes. The goal is to create a tax framework that does not bias business
decisions based on tax considerations alone.
However, it's important to note that achieving perfect tax neutrality is challenging,
as taxes inevitably have some impact on economic behavior. While tax neutrality
strives to minimize distortions, it is difficult to eliminate them entirely due to the
complexities of tax systems and the diverse objectives they aim to achieve.
In reality, taxes can influence business decisions to some extent. The tax code may
provide incentives, such as tax credits or deductions, to promote specific activities
or industries. Conversely, certain taxes, such as high corporate tax rates or
transaction taxes, can discourage certain business activities or investments.
The impact of taxes on business decisions can have both positive and negative
effects. On one hand, targeted tax incentives can stimulate economic growth,
investment, and innovation in specific sectors. They can encourage businesses to
engage in socially desirable activities, such as research and development,
renewable energy, or job creation.
On the other hand, tax biases or distortions can create inefficiencies and
misallocation of resources. If taxes disproportionately burden certain activities or
sectors, businesses may make decisions based on tax optimization rather than
 15

economic merit. This can lead to suboptimal allocation of capital, reduced

productivity, and hindered economic growth.
The question of whether tax neutrality is good or bad depends on the broader
objectives of the tax system and the specific circumstances. A well-designed tax
system aims to strike a balance between neutrality, revenue generation, and
achieving policy goals, such as promoting social welfare, reducing income
inequality, or addressing externalities.
Governments must consider trade-offs when designing tax policies. They may use
tax incentives strategically to stimulate desired economic activities or correct
market failures. However, overly complex or inconsistent tax provisions can create
uncertainty, administrative burdens, and unintended consequences.
In summary, tax neutrality is the concept that taxes should ideally have minimal
influence on economic decision-making. While perfect tax neutrality is difficult to
achieve, policymakers strive to create tax systems that minimize distortions and
provide a level playing field for businesses. Balancing neutrality with other policy
objectives is crucial to promote economic efficiency and social welfare.

Transfer Pricing Regulations in Bangladesh

As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, Bangladesh has transfer pricing
regulations in place to govern the pricing of transactions between related parties.
The transfer pricing regulations in Bangladesh are primarily outlined in the Income
Tax Ordinance, 1984, and the Income Tax Rules, 1984. These regulations are
aligned with the international guidelines provided by the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Here are some key features of the transfer pricing regulations in Bangladesh:
1. Arm's Length Principle: Bangladesh follows the arm's length principle,
which requires that the pricing of transactions between related parties should
be consistent with what would have been agreed upon between unrelated
parties under similar circumstances.
2. Documentation Requirements: Taxpayers engaged in related party
transactions are required to maintain contemporaneous transfer pricing
documentation. This documentation should include details of the controlled
 16

transactions, the selection and application of the transfer pricing method, and
information on comparables used for analysis.
3. Transfer Pricing Methods: The Income Tax Rules, 1984, provides guidance
on the transfer pricing methods to be used in determining arm's length
prices. The prescribed methods include the comparable uncontrolled price
method, resale price method, cost plus method, and transactional net margin
method.
4. Documentation Disclosure: Taxpayers are required to submit a Transfer
Pricing Disclosure Form along with their tax return, providing information
on the related party transactions and the transfer pricing method used.
5. Advance Pricing Agreement (APA): The National Board of Revenue (NBR)
in Bangladesh has the provision for entering into Advance Pricing
Agreements with taxpayers. APAs provide certainty on transfer pricing
arrangements and help avoid disputes by agreeing on the pricing
methodology in advance.
6. Penalties and Dispute Resolution: Non-compliance with transfer pricing
regulations can lead to penalties, including adjustments to taxable income,
interest charges, and penalties on under-reported income. Tax disputes
related to transfer pricing are resolved through the tax appeal process, which
involves the Tax Appellate Tribunal and ultimately the High Court.
It's important to note that tax regulations are subject to change, and it's
recommended to consult the latest laws and regulations or seek professional advice
for the most up-to-date information on transfer pricing regulations in Bangladesh.
Legal Provisions Governing the Transfer Pricing in Bangladesh
The Income Tax Ordinance, 1984 CHAPTER XIA Transfer Pricing
1. 107A. Definitions.-
2. 107B. Determination of income from international transaction having regard to
arm’s length price.-
3. 107C. Computation of arm’s length price.-
4. 107D. Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer.-
5. 107E. Maintenance and keeping of information, documents and records.-
 17

6. 107EE. Statement of international transactions to be submitted.-

7. 107F. Report from an accountant to be furnished.-
8. 107G. Penalty for failure to keep, maintain or furnish information, documents or
records to the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes.-
9. 107H. Penalty for failure to comply with the notice or requisition under section
107C.-
10. 107HH. Penalty for failure to comply with the provision of section 107EE.
11. 107I. Penalty for failure to furnish report under section 107F.-
12. 107J. Applicability of this Chapter.-

Advance Pricing Agreement in the context of International Transfer Pricing

An Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) is a mechanism used in the context of
international transfer pricing to provide taxpayers and tax authorities with certainty
and clarity regarding their transfer pricing arrangements. It is a formal agreement
between a taxpayer and one or more tax authorities that determines an appropriate
transfer pricing methodology and sets the acceptable arm's length pricing for a
specific set of transactions over a defined period of time.
The purpose of an APA is to proactively address potential transfer pricing disputes
by establishing a mutual understanding between the taxpayer and the tax
authorities regarding the transfer pricing methods, principles, and pricing to be
applied. APAs help minimize uncertainty, avoid costly and time-consuming audits
or litigation, and provide a framework for compliance.
Here are some key aspects of APAs in the context of international transfer pricing:
1. Types of APAs: There are generally three types of APAs: a. Unilateral APA:
Involves an agreement between the taxpayer and the tax authority of the
country where the taxpayer is located. b. Bilateral APA: Involves an
agreement between the taxpayer, the tax authority of the country where the
taxpayer is located, and the tax authority of another relevant country. c.
 18

Multilateral APA: Involves an agreement between the taxpayer and two or

more tax authorities of different countries.
2. Process: The APA process typically involves the following steps: a. Pre-
filing consultation: The taxpayer engages in discussions with the tax
authorities to understand their requirements and assess the suitability of an
APA. b. Formal application: The taxpayer submits a formal application to
the tax authorities, including detailed information on the proposed transfer
pricing arrangements and supporting documentation. c. Negotiation: The
taxpayer and the tax authorities engage in negotiations to reach an agreement
on the transfer pricing methodology, pricing, and other relevant terms. d.
Agreement and implementation: Once an agreement is reached, the APA is
formalized through a written agreement, and the taxpayer is required to
comply with the agreed terms for the specified period.
3. Duration and Renewal: APAs have a predetermined duration, typically
ranging from 3 to 5 years. At the end of the APA term, the taxpayer and tax
authorities can evaluate the agreement's performance and consider whether
to renew or amend it based on changes in business conditions, economic
factors, or regulatory requirements.
4. Benefits: APAs provide several benefits to taxpayers and tax authorities,
including: a. Certainty and reduced compliance burden: Taxpayers gain
certainty regarding their transfer pricing arrangements, minimizing the risk
of audits, adjustments, and potential penalties. b. Cost and time savings:
APAs help avoid costly and time-consuming disputes, audits, and litigation
by proactively addressing transfer pricing matters. c. Improved relationships:
APAs foster a cooperative relationship between taxpayers and tax
authorities, promoting transparency, trust, and mutual understanding.
5. Confidentiality: APAs typically involve strict confidentiality provisions to
protect sensitive business information shared between the taxpayer and the
tax authorities during the negotiation and implementation process.
It's important to note that the specific rules and procedures for APAs may vary
across jurisdictions. Taxpayers considering an APA should consult the relevant tax
authorities and seek professional advice to understand the requirements and
processes applicable in their specific jurisdiction.
Practical Exercise of Transfer Pricing
 19

Sure! Let's walk through a practical exercise of transfer pricing to illustrate how it
works. Let's consider a hypothetical multinational company, XYZ Inc., which has
subsidiaries in two countries: Country A and Country B. XYZ Inc. manufactures
electronic components in Country A and sells them to its subsidiary in Country B,
which further processes and sells the finished products to customers.
1. Analysis of Controlled Transactions: The first step is to identify the
controlled transactions between the entities. In this case, it involves the sale
of electronic components from Country A to Country B.
2. Functional and Risk Analysis: Next, analyze the functions performed, assets
used, and risks assumed by each entity involved in the controlled
transaction. Country A entity performs manufacturing activities and bears
the risks associated with production, while Country B entity engages in
marketing, distribution, and assumes the risks related to sales.
3. Selection of Transfer Pricing Method: Based on the analysis, select an
appropriate transfer pricing method. Let's assume that the Transactional Net
Margin Method (TNMM) is chosen, comparing the net profit margins of
similar transactions between independent companies.
4. Gathering Comparable Data: Collect data on comparable transactions
between unrelated companies. This may involve researching industry
databases, publicly available information, or engaging the services of
transfer pricing specialists. The data should be comparable in terms of
industry, products, functions, risks, and market conditions.
5. Calculation and Determination of Arm's Length Price: Apply the selected
transfer pricing method to determine the arm's length price. For example, if
the TNMM is used, calculate the net profit margin of comparable
transactions and apply that margin to the relevant base (e.g., sales, costs) of
the controlled transaction to arrive at an arm's length price.
6. Documentation: Maintain comprehensive documentation supporting the
transfer pricing analysis and determination of the arm's length price. This
documentation should include relevant data, analysis, assumptions, and
explanations to demonstrate compliance with transfer pricing regulations.
7. Compliance and Reporting: Ensure compliance with the local transfer
pricing regulations, including filing any required transfer pricing
documentation or disclosures with the tax authorities. In some jurisdictions,
 20

there may be specific reporting forms or requirements related to transfer

pricing.
8. Monitoring and Adjustments: Regularly monitor the transfer pricing
arrangements and update them as needed to reflect changes in the business,
market conditions, or regulatory requirements. Adjustments may be
necessary if there are material changes in functions performed, risks
assumed, or other relevant factors.
It's important to note that the practical application of transfer pricing can be
complex and highly fact-specific. The exercise above provides a general overview,
but the actual analysis and determination of arm's length prices require careful
consideration of specific circumstances, local regulations, and professional
expertise. Seeking the assistance of transfer pricing specialists or tax advisors is
recommended to ensure compliance and accuracy in transfer pricing practices.
Assume we have a multinational company, XYZ Inc., with a manufacturing
subsidiary in Country A and a sales subsidiary in Country B. XYZ Inc. sells a
specific product to its subsidiary in Country B, which then resells it to external
customers.
Here are the relevant details for our exercise:
1. Manufacturing Costs: The total manufacturing costs incurred by XYZ Inc.'s
subsidiary in Country A for producing the product amount to $1,000,000.
2. Selling Price: XYZ Inc.'s subsidiary in Country B sells the product to
external customers at a price of $1,500,000.
Now, let's determine the arm's length price for the product using a cost-plus
transfer pricing method.
1. Cost-Plus Method Calculation: The cost-plus method adds an appropriate
profit margin to the cost incurred by the manufacturer. Let's assume a profit
margin of 20% is deemed reasonable for this type of transaction.
Cost incurred by the manufacturer (Country A subsidiary) = $1,000,000 Profit
margin = 20% of the cost incurred = 20% * $1,000,000 = $200,000
Arm's Length Price = Cost incurred + Profit margin Arm's Length Price =
$1,000,000 + $200,000 = $1,200,000
 21

Therefore, the arm's length price for the product based on the cost-plus method
would be $1,200,000.
This arm's length price ensures that the subsidiary in Country B earns a reasonable
profit margin on top of the cost incurred by the manufacturer in Country A. It
aligns with the principle of transfer pricing, which aims to establish prices for
related party transactions that are consistent with those between independent
parties.
It's important to note that this exercise simplifies the transfer pricing analysis by
focusing solely on the cost-plus method. In practice, other factors such as
functional analysis, comparability analysis, and availability of comparable data
would be considered to determine the most appropriate transfer pricing method and
arm's length price.
Please remember that transfer pricing exercises can vary significantly depending
on the specific circumstances, jurisdictions involved, and applicable regulations.
Professional advice and expertise should be sought for accurate and comprehensive
transfer pricing analysis and compliance.