Introduction To IE
Introduction To IE
Introduction To IE
Economics
Institutional Economics
• An economics discipline studying how institutions emerge,
persist and change, and what are the results of their
operation.
• Institutional economics is a branch of economics that studies
how economic institutions, such as markets, firms, contracts,
norms, and laws, affect economic behavior and outcomes.
Defining Institutions
• Institutions are the rules of a society, or, to put it in a more formal way, constraints
on human interaction created by the people themselves“ (North 1992, p. 3.)
• “In order to express it in the language of economists: institutions define and limit
the choices of individuals“ (North 1992, p. 4)
• North defines institutions as "humanly devised constraints that structure political,
economic and social interactions”
• Rules of the game
• „The main purpose of institutions is to establish a stable (but not
necessarily efficient) order in order to reduce insecurity in human
interaction“ (North 1992, p. 6)
• Menard and Shirley, 2005: Rules of the game: the written and unwritten rules,
norms and constraints on human actions shaping the incentives of economic
agents.
Why are we motivated to study institutions and institutional
economics?
• Inclusive economic institutions: Secure property rights, law and order, markets and state
support (public services and regulation) for markets; open to relatively free entry of new
businesses; uphold contracts; access to education and opportunity for the great majority
of citizens.
• Why wouldn’t every dictator, tyrant and elite wish to create as much
wealth as possible?
• The reason is that growth, and inclusive institutions that will support it, will
create both winners and losers….Creative destruction
• Thus, there is a logic supporting extractive institutions and stagnation!
– Economic losers: those who will lose their incomes, for example their monopolies,
because of changes in institutions or introduction of new technologies
– When inefficient economic institutions convert to efficient, some groups get worse off and
such groups hinder the institution transformation
– Political losers: those who will lose their politically privileged position, their unconstrained
monopoly of power, because of growth and its supporting institutions fear of political
creative destruction
• Both are important in practice, but particularly political losers are a major
barrier against the emergence of inclusive institutions and economic growth.
Botswana
• Around Independence 1966: Only a handful of university graduates,
and the first government secondary school was not established until
the eve of independence .
• There were five kilometers of paved road in a country the size of
France.
• From 1965 to 1999, Botswana achieved the world’s highest rate of
growth of per capita income: over 7 percent per annum
• By 1999, Botswana’s income per head was six times that of the rest
of SSA, and 60 percent of the world average.
• Diamond revenues invested in education and health
• Botswana held its first multiparty elections in 1965, eighteen months
before independence
Cont’d
• Since independence, Botswana has held elections every five
years, from 1969 to 2004.
• The Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) won 81 percent of the
vote in 1965, and its majority shrank over the succeeding thirty-
four years. Twice (1969 and 1984) a sitting vice president lost
his seat in the elections.
• Transparency International has ranked Botswana as having the
lowest perceived corruption in Africa.
• Impressive growth but HIV epidemic….public policy failure?
• Will this be sustained?
Formal and Informal institutions
• A broad cluster including many sub levels:
• Important distinction between : Formal and Informal institutions
• Formal institutions: codified rules, e.g. in the constitution
• Informal institutions: related to how formal institutions are used, to
distribution of power, social norms, and equilibrium.
• Constitutions in U.S. and many Latin American countries similar,
but the practice of politics, and constraints on presidents and elites
very different.
• Why? Because distribution of political power can be very different
even when formal institutions are similar.
Formal and Informal institutions
• Formal - are those whose norms, rules and sanctions are guaranteed
through formal processes that are usually but not always official and are
written and enforceable through legal recourse or arbitration; can be
associated with organizations of the state, market or civil society.
• Rules that are readily observable through written documents or
rules that are determined and executed through formal position, such as
authority or ownership
• Institutions based on existing legislation. Identifiable within the legal
framework of the country/region.
• Example: constitutions, laws, property rights, rules and regulations put
in place by the government, explicit incentives, contractual terms, and
firm boundaries
Informal institutions
• Rules based on implicit understandings, being in most part socially
derived and therefore not accessible through written documents or
necessarily sanctioned through formal position.
• Are social norms that represent evolved practices with stable rules of
behavior outside the formal system
• Are how to behave in everyday life (linked to religion, history, social
acceptability).
• Institutions arising due to cultural factors or non-legal conventions
between individuals. May be difficult to detect.
• Examples: social norms, routines, and political processes, Sanctions,
taboos, customs, traditions, and codes of conduct, norms of behavior,
conventions