QATAME - Contents
QATAME - Contents
QATAME - Contents
(Appendix VII-B)
1
For full text, refer to: G. Pine and P. Horne. 1999. Principles and Conditions of Adult Learning. In C. Ortigas. Group
Process and the Inductive Method. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.
Principles of Learning
Learning is an experience, which occurs inside the learner and is activated by the
1
learner. No one directly teaches anyone anything of significance.
9 Problem solving and learning are highly unique and individual processes.
2
For full text, refer to: G. Pine and P. Horne. 1999. Principles and Conditions of Adult Learning. In C. Ortigas. Group
Process and the Inductive Method. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University.
The type of program management structure for learning and development programs/
Below are typical program management structures for the different modalities.
Since JEL covers L&D interventions that are integrated in the employees’ workplace
performance and practices, the management structure for this type of modality
involves the employee’s direct supervisor as the Program and Learning Manager.
As the Program and Learning Manager, the supervisor has the primary
and the employees’ learning progress. The supervisor collaborates with his/her
intervention.
to job expansion, stretch assignments and informal JEL interventions, where the
employee. In some instances, the supervisor may delegate supervision of the JEL
person, the supervisor coordinates with the committee chair to brief him/her on the
Box 2. Program Management Structure for
Committee Work objective of the employee’s
and coaches the employee on matters related to the committee work. The
supervisor also coaches the employee, as necessary, and facilitates processing of the
employee’s experience during and after the assignment. Box 2 shows the program
The Committee Work program management structure also applies for Special
Projects, if the immediate supervisor is not the lead person for the project.
In the case of Job Shadowing, the typical JEL program management structure applies
purpose of the Job Shadowing intervention, and to get feedback on the employee’s
Please see Box 3 for the Job Shadowing program management structure.
Job Rotation involves cross - posting of employees to other work stations. Aside from
having the head of office approve the temporary transfer of employees, the
supervisor also informs the office’s human resource unit on the movement of
with the units to which the employees will be cross-posted to discuss the purpose of
the intervention, and to get feedback on the employees’ progress and performance.
the workplace. As such, the employee’s immediate supervisor acts as the Program
The typical JEL program management structure applies if the immediate supervisor is
the coach or the mentor. In cases when another person is identified as the coach or
mentor, the supervisor as the Program and Learning Manager collaborates with this
person to ensure that the purpose of the intervention is clear, and to get feedback
Box 5 shows the program management structure for coaching and mentoring (where
the coach or mentor is not the Box 5. Program Management Structure for
Coaching and Mentoring
employee’s supervisor).
Mentor or Coach
supervisor as the Program and Learning Manager works with both employees to
shown in Box 6.
A Community of Practice that is exclusive to an office, unit or school will also have
may join communities of practice that are outside of the agency, the supervisor or a
designated person may perform the role of a learning facilitator who will process,
communities of practice.
Formal learning interventions like training courses, conferences, seminars, etc. have
a more defined program management structure, owing to the multiple tasks that
face-to-face setting.
Box 7 shows a typical program management structure for training courses, seminars
and conferences. The team composition may be adjusted depending on the coverage
Logistics Officer and Welfare Officer may be performed by one person, the Project
Manager may also take on role of Learning Manager, or the task of documentation
Table XX presents the key tasks included in the LDD Program Management Team (PMT)
members’ terms of reference, clustered along three phases: pre-delivery, actual delivery
and post-delivery.3
3
For brevity, “intervention” will be used throughout Table XX, instead of “program/intervention,” except when referring to the
Program Owner, the Program Management Team (PMT), Program Manager, and Program Secretariat.
Checks safety and security Ensures that provisions for Prepares report on critical
Welfare Officer
provisions in the session inclusion, safety, security, incidents related to inclusion,
Ensures that provisions venue, billeting places and health, and wellness are always safety, security, health, and
for inclusion, safety, other learning sites in place wellness, and submits to PM
Finance Officer Assists Program Manager in Reimburses travel and other Liquidates all fund
the preparation of the budget related expenses associated disbursements and prepare
Oversees all finance- proposal and other needed with participation of learners, financial report as input to
related concerns of the financial documents LDD PMT, and LSP team Intervention Completion
L&D intervention, Ensures availability of funds for Oversees efficient allocation Report
including the efficient venue, meals, and other and timely release of funds Compiles feedback and critical
allocation and timely logistics Monitors and documents all incidents related to
release of funds as well Initiates procurement disbursements against budget intervention’s financial
as the documentation processes of resources, to support liquidation management and submit to
QAME Coordinator Collaborates with LDD PMT in Applies process observation Analyzes Level 1 evaluation
ensuring that pre-delivery and prescribed tools to results and prepares report for
processes and standards are monitor and evaluate presentation during post-
Implements the L&D observed intervention delivery intervention debrief
intervention QAME plan Assists the Program Manager Prepares daily QAME report Assists Learning Manager in
in collaboration with in accomplishing the Pre- and submits to PM for analyzing Level 2 evaluation
the PMT Intervention Delivery Checklist discussion during end-of-day results
debriefing sessions Prepares Post- Intervention
Secretariat Participates in pre-delivery Attends to registration needs Assists the Program Manager in
meeting with the LDD PMT to of learners preparing the Intervention
Provides clerical and run through detailed Ensures that learners fill up Completion Report
administrative support intervention design and attendance sheets every day Compiles feedback and critical
to learners and the identify needed secretariat Prepares directory of learners incidents related to secretariat
Program/Intervention Title
Implementation Date/s
Venue
4
List may be modified depending on the L&D program modality.
* Temperature control
Ventilation
Details Status
Meal * Meals to be served (AM/PM snacks,
requirements
Meals
lunch, etc.)
Others
* Dates reserved
Contract for venue * Contract fee
* Payment schedule
Arrangement for * Venue and set-up for socials
socials
* Food and drinks requirement
Handouts and
Learning Resource Materials
Attendance sheet
Other Forms
* Format
* Level 1 and 2 evaluation tools
Registration form * Documentation template
Level 1 evaluation
Level 2 evaluation
it
ersK
n
Certificate of
Appearance
Markers
Masking tape
Supplies and Materials
Meta-strips/cards
Map pins
Puncher
Paper clips
Stapler/ staple
wire
Scissors
Cutter
Folders
Envelopes
Prizes
First-aid kit
Extension cords
USB/thumb drives
National anthem/s
(audio)
Flag
Others
Camera
Recorder
Others
Travel and
Details Status
Transportation
Transportation * Travel requirements of learners, PMT
This section clarifies the purpose of the MoA: why and how the parties came together. It
includes:
This section identifies the mutual and joint responsibilities (collaborative tasks) and the
expected result of those joint efforts. In addition, it lists the specific roles and
the payment. The payment schedule should include a timeline of specific deliverables that
This section states the effective date of the agreement, and how the agreement can be
modified or terminated.
Spaces are provided for the names and signatures of an official from each party who is
authorized to approve agreements on the party’s behalf. A space for the date the
Note: The MoA is not in effect until all parties have signed the document. Each party should
Source: National Education Academy of the Philippines. Series of workshops and write-
shops on preparing the L&D System Manual (2016-2017). Unpublished
Program/Intervention
Indicate full title of the L&D program/intervention.
Title
Indicate location and specific venue; e.g. Cebu City, DepEd
Location and Venue
Ecotech Center
Indicate duration (number of days) and dates (from dd/mo/yr
Duration and Dates
- dd/mo/yr) of the L&D program/intervention.)
Learning Service
Indicate names of facilitators/trainers and their positions.
Providers
Program/Intervention
Attach detailed L&D intervention design. (Attachment 3)
Schedule
Program M&E Results Identify key results of the L&D program/intervention, based on
analysis of monitoring and evaluation data. (Refer to Monitoring
and Evaluation Plan.)
Appendix VII-F
The physical setup of chairs, tables, and presentation in a session room can significantly
arrangements can impact how the learning facilitator or trainer communicates with
learners and how learners interact with one another, impacting engagement,
More recent research also suggests that learners tend to prefer more flexible seating
arrangements (Harvey and Kenyon, 2013). In particular, learners have been shown to be
5
Adapted from Yale Center for Teaching and Learning. Classroom Seating Arrangements. Retrieved from
https://ctl.yale.edu/ClassroomSeatingArrangements (22 March 2018)
2017). Facilitators can consider ways to modify seating arrangements and match
Examples
Semicircle
Traditional (also known as classroom set-up)- The traditional lecture setup typically
consists of rows of fixed seating. Learners face the trainer with their backs to one
row or along the middle of the classroom. Learners in back rows are more likely to be
less engaged.
This can be used for formal presentations and lectures, rather than for facilitated
activities.
Roundtable - Many room arrangements may consist of facilitator (trainer) and learners
sitting around a single large table. This seating arrangement can also be formed using
individual desks. Learners and trainer all face one another in this setup, which can
Appropriate for small size of learners where group discussion or small conversations is
Horseshoe or Semicircle (also known as U-shape or case room set-up) - The horseshoe
or semi-circle offers a modified roundtable setup, where all participants face each other
while the facilitator (trainer) can move about the room. The horseshoe encourages
discussion between learners and with the trainer, although this setup tends to
encourage more engagement between the facilitator and learners directly opposite,
horseshoe setup can be particularly effective when the facilitator wishes to project and
Double Horseshoe - This seating arrangement involves an inner and outer horseshoe,
and similar to the conventional horseshoe, invites greater discussion than the
traditional format. It is more limited by the backs of learners within the inner circle
facing learners in the outer circle. However, learners may also more easily interact with
those nearest to them or turn around and face learners behind them for group work.
Pods (also known as cluster set-up)- The pod or pair arrangement can be designed with
facilitators can place several tables together to form learner groups (e.g. 3 - 4 learners),
or pairs. This arrangement can be especially advantageous when learners will work in
groups or pairs with their classmates for a large portion of class time. More generally,
Recommendations
arrangement to session objectives. For instance, classes involving group work might
utilize group pods, while whole class discussion might benefit from a horseshoe.
Facilitators can also strategically change arrangements during class to suit shifting
learning goals.
where learners along the sides may experience less attention, an instructor may be
classroom setup where the facilitator cannot change the seating arrangements, they
learning activities conducive to learners working with a neighbor. They can also
encourage learner groups to work in other spaces of the classroom as needed (e.g.
Set up early - Rooms should be set-up early before sessions. A short stretch break may
be called if succeeding activities require new room arrangements. Learners may also be
requested to help.
References
Harvey EJ, Kenyon MC. (2013). Classroom Seating Considerations for 21st Century
Learners and Faculty. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(1).
Rands ML and Gansemer-Topf AN. (2017). The Room Itself is Active: How Classroom
Design Impacts Learner Engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1).
Purpose and To guide the L&D Program Management Team in ensuring that all critical
users of the program/intervention delivery requirements are available and in place
tool prior to implementation.
Terminal Objective
Target Participants
Number of Target
Participants
Region Division
School
Venue
Duration Dates
Budget Requirement
Implementing Office
Program Manager
Direction: Please assess your office’s readiness to implement the L&D program along each
of the program delivery requirements.
o Tick (✓) the box opposite item if this is complete or fully complied with.
o Note down under “Remarks” the gaps and status of items that are incomplete.
1
Authority to Conduct/ Activity
.
Request
2
.
Training Program Design
3
.
Financial Requirements
4
.
Logistical Requirements
7
Orientation of Program
.
Management Team
8
Orientation and Training of
.
Trainers and Facilitators
9
Trainers’/Learning Facilitators’
.
Delivery Package
1
0
Learners’ Resource Package
.
1
1
Program Evaluation tools
.
Direction: Evaluate the L&D program/intervention in all standards applicable to the L&D
modality. Tick (✓) the box corresponding to the assessment rating of each standard:
o F - Full compliance
o S - Substantial compliance
o P - Partial compliance
o N - No compliance
Note down specific comments for items that did not fully meet standards.
Assessment
Standards
F S P N Comments
Team Management
1. Program Management Team (PMT) structure and
composition is adequate in number and competency
mix to perform roles.
2. Roles and expectations from PMT members are
clearly defined and documented in a terms of
reference (TOR) and agreed on.
3. PMT members possess the required competencies
to perform assigned roles.
4. Learning service providers (e.g., learning facilitators,
resource persons, etc.) are adequate in number and
meet competency requirements for assigned roles
based on NEAP’s screening and accreditation
process.
5. TOR and contracts (including honorarium) of
external learning service providers are approved and
signed by both parties (DepEd and external service
providers) before actual conduct of the
*
Mandatory for formal knowledge and skills transfer modalities.
*
Mandatory for formal knowledge and skills transfer modalities.
Learning Management
1. Tools and materials that will support learning
management are prepared.
2. Team members who will monitor learning
management and handle management of learning
activities are clear about their roles.
To the participant: Your inputs are vital in ensuring that each learning session meets your
learning objectives.
Items SA A D SD
1. My learning objectives for the session were met.
2. The information I got from the session is relevant and
applicable to my work.
3. The organization and sequence of topics facilitated my
learning.
4. The time allotted for the session was sufficient for me to
absorb inputs or accomplish outputs.
5. The session started and ended on time.
BASIC INFORMATION
Region
Division
Activity/Event Monitored
Address
Inclusive Dates
Date Monitored
8
This form was developed by NEAP and is currently used by QAME associates certified by NEAP.
Please rate the conduct of the program delivery along the following areas.
Activities SA A D SD
1. Operational concerns
- Training Venue
- Accommodation
1. Certification of Participants
2. Program Evaluation
(either positive or negative) that needs to be detailed here, please accomplish the
accomplished.
Action – Describe how the person/s or the team responded to the situation or acted
Date
CRITICAL INCIDENTS
Program/Intervention Title
Dates conducted
To the participant: Please help us assess the conduct of this learning intervention by checking
the appropriate cell opposite each item.
ITEMS 1 2 3 4
A. Learning Objectives
1. Learning objectives were clearly presented at the start of the
intervention.
2. Learning objectives were responsive to my competency
development needs.
3. Learning objectives were achieved by the end of intervention.
Remarks/Observations:
9
Adapted from STRIVE (2010). Training and Development System, Volume 5:
Program Delivery System.
Remarks/Observations:
C. Program Management
1. Organization of learning sessions facilitated achievement of
learning objectives.
2. Learning sessions were delivered according to planned
schedule of activities.
3. Learning resources and support materials provided helped
meet learning objectives.
4. Adequate learning resources and support materials were
provided in a timely manner.
5. Learning sessions were adjusted to meet any emerging
needs of learners.
D. Welfare Support
1. Learning venue was in a safe and accessible location.
Remarks/Observations:
Remarks/Observations:
Remarks/Observations:
Name (Optional)
Office/School
Program/Intervention Title
Date
Facilitators/Resource
Persons
Program Manager