Microservices
Microservices
Microservices
independent components that communicate with each other through well-defined interfaces. This architecture
contrasts with traditional monolithic designs, where different functionalities are tightly integrated into a single
codebase.
Microservices design patterns are a set of methodologies that provide solutions to recurrent design problems.
Think of them as templates that can be used in the creation of microservices applications. These patterns are
particularly useful when developing complex applications with a large number of microservices.
Managing a microservices architecture involves a variety of complex challenges that are seldom encountered in
traditional monolithic systems. These challenges include:
Fault tolerance: In a distributed system, a failure in one service shouldn’t lead to a system-wide
collapse.
Data consistency: Unlike monolithic systems where you can rely on ACID transactions in a single
database, microservices often have their own databases, making transactional consistency a big
concern.
Service discoverability: How services locate each other in a dynamically scaling environment.
To address these challenges systematically, developers can leverage microservices design patterns. These are
tested solutions that serve as templates for solving recurring design problems. They guide development teams
towards best practices in microservices development, and provide structures that make it easier to create
complex but stable systems.
There are numerous microservices design patterns that you can use, each with their unique advantages and
use cases. Here are some of the more important patterns:
1. Service Registry
A service registry is like a map for your services; it keeps track of all the services in your system, making it
easier for them to find each other.
Every service in your system needs to register itself with the service registry when it starts up, and deregister
when it shuts down. Other services can then query the service registry to locate the services they need to
interact with. This allows your system to be dynamic and adaptable, as services can come and go as required
without disrupting the overall functionality.
2. Circuit Breaker
A circuit breaker is used to detect failures and encapsulate the logic of preventing a failure from constantly
recurring. Circuit breakers could be triggered due to bugs in one or more microservices, temporary external
system failure, or unexpected operating conditions.
In a microservices architecture, you employ the circuit breaker pattern to monitor the interaction between
services. If a service is failing or responding slowly, the circuit breaker trips and prevents further calls to the
service, thus preventing a system-wide failure. Once the service is back up, the circuit breaker resets, and
things go back to normal.
3. API Gateway
An API gateway acts as a single entry point into your system for all clients. This can be especially beneficial if
you have multiple client apps, such as a web app and a mobile app, as it allows you to maintain a single API
for all clients, simplifying client-side code.
The API gateway can handle requests in one of two ways. It could route requests to the appropriate services
directly, or it could use a process known as composition, where it would combine data from multiple services
and return the aggregate result to the client. This not only simplifies client-side code but also makes your
system more efficient and user-friendly.
4. Event-Driven Architecture
In an event-driven architecture, when a service performs an action that other services need to know about, it
emits an event—a record of the action. Other services then react to the event as necessary. This is a powerful
way to decouple services and allows for highly scalable and robust systems.
This architecture allows you to build systems that are more resilient to failure, as the services do not need to
be aware of each other. If one service fails, it does not affect the others. Additionally, this architecture allows
for high scalability, as you can add new services to the system without affecting existing ones.
In a traditional monolithic application, you would have a single database that all services interact with.
However, in a microservices architecture, each service has its own database.
Why is this beneficial? Well, it allows each service to be decoupled from the others, which means that a failure
in one service does not affect the others. Furthermore, it allows for better performance, as each service can be
optimized independently based on its specific needs.
CQRS is a microservices design pattern that separates read and write operations. In traditional systems, the
same data model is often used for both these operations. However, CQRS advocates for a different approach.
It proposes the use of separate models for update (Command) and read (Query) operations. This segregation
enables you to optimize each model for its specific purpose, thereby improving performance and scalability.
However, implementing CQRS is not without its challenges. It can complicate your system due to the need to
synchronize two data models. But, when applied correctly, it can significantly enhance the flexibility and
performance of your system.
7. Externalized Configuration
The externalized configuration pattern advocates for the separation of configuration from the code. This
separation allows you to modify the behavior of your application without the need for code changes or system
restarts.
This pattern is particularly useful in microservices architectures where you may have multiple instances of a
service running with different configurations. By externalizing the configuration, you can manage all instances
efficiently. However, it does require a robust configuration management system to avoid configuration drift.
8. Saga Pattern
The saga pattern is used to ensure data consistency across multiple services in a microservices architecture. In
traditional monolithic systems, transactions are usually managed using a two-phase commit. However, in a
microservices architecture, where services are loosely coupled and distributed, this approach is not practical.
The saga pattern proposes an alternative solution. It suggests breaking a transaction into multiple local
transactions. Each local transaction updates data within a single service and publishes an event. Other services
listen to these events and perform their local transactions. If a local transaction fails, compensating
transactions are executed to undo the changes.
9. Bulkhead Pattern
The bulkhead pattern is a microservices design pattern that helps to prevent failures in one part of a system
from cascading to other parts. It does so by isolating elements of an application into pools so that if one fails,
the others continue to function.
This pattern is inspired by the bulkheads in a ship. Just as a ship is divided into watertight compartments to
prevent it from sinking if one part is breached, an application can be divided into isolated groups to protect it
from failures.
The BFF pattern proposes the creation of separate backend services for different types of clients (like desktop,
mobile, etc.). This allows you to tailor the backend services to the specific needs of each client, thereby
improving user experience and performance.
However, this pattern can lead to code duplication if not managed properly. Therefore, it is crucial to strike a
balance between customization and code reuse when using the BFF pattern.
Choosing the right design patterns for your microservices architecture is critical for building a robust and
scalable system. Here are a few factors to consider while making your choice.
Evaluate resilience requirements: Different patterns offer different levels of resilience. For
instance, the bulkhead pattern can improve resilience by preventing failures from cascading. Evaluate
how crucial resilience is for your system and choose patterns accordingly.
Consider security implications: Some patterns may have security implications. For example, the
externalized configuration pattern requires a secure configuration management system to protect
sensitive configuration information.
Reusability and future-proofing: Design patterns like backends for frontends can enhance
reusability by allowing you to tailor backends for different clients. Meanwhile, patterns like CQRS can
future-proof your system by providing flexibility and scalability.
The Codefresh Software Delivery Platform helps you answer important questions within your organization,
whether you’re a developer or a product manager:
With Codefresh, you can answer all of these questions by viewing one dashboard, our Applications Dashboard
that can help you visualize an entire microservices application in one glance:
The dashboard lets you view the following information in one place:
Fault isolation: A failure in one service does not impact the functionality of other
services. This aspect improves the resilience of the system.
It provides services such as service discovery and load balancing that are critical for
running a microservices architecture.
It provides the necessary tooling and APIs for automating the deployment, scaling,
and management of your microservices.
Once the Deployment is created, Kubernetes will schedule the specified number of
microservice replicas to run on nodes in the cluster. It will also monitor these replicas to
ensure they continue running. If a replica fails, Kubernetes will automatically restart it.
Kubernetes also supports automatic scaling of microservices based on CPU usage or other
application-provided metrics. This allows the microservice to automatically adjust to changes
in load without manual intervention.
Kubernetes provides built-in metrics for nodes and the control plane, and these metrics can be
collected and visualized using tools like Prometheus and Grafana.
For the applications running within each microservice, you can use application performance
monitoring (APM) tools to collect detailed performance data. These tools can provide
insights into service response times, error rates, and other important performance indicators.
Kubernetes provides a built-in mechanism for collecting and viewing logs. It also provides
metrics that can help diagnose performance issues. A new feature is the kubectl debug node
command, which lets you deploy a Kubernetes pod to a node that you want to troubleshoot.
This is useful when you cannot access a node using an SSH connection.
If these tools are not sufficient, you can attach a debugger to the running microservice.
However, this is more complex in a Kubernetes environment due to the fact that the
microservices are running in containers on potentially many different nodes.
Implementing Continuous
Delivery/Continuous Deployment (CD) with
Kubernetes
Kubernetes provides a solid foundation for implementing continuous delivery or continuous
deployment (CD) for microservices. The Kubernetes Deployment object provides a
declarative way to manage the desired state of your microservices. This makes it easy to
automate the process of deploying, updating, and scaling your microservices.In addition,
Kubernetes provides built-in support for rolling updates. This allows you to gradually roll out
changes to your microservices, reducing the risk of introducing a breaking change. Open
source tools like Argo Rollouts provide more reliable rollback functionality, as well as
support for progressive deployment strategies likeblue/green deployments and canary
releases.
Ingress is an API object that provides HTTP and HTTPS routing to services within a cluster
based on host and path. Essentially, it acts as a reverse proxy, routing incoming requests to
the appropriate service. This allows you to expose multiple services under the same IP
address, simplifying your application’s architecture and making it easier to manage.
In addition to simplifying routing, Ingress also provides other features such as SSL/TLS
termination, load balancing, and name-based virtual hosting. These features can greatly
improve the performance and security of your microservices application.
One such tool is the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA). The HPA automatically scales the
number of pods in a deployment based on observed CPU utilization or, with custom metrics
support, on any other application-provided metrics. This allows your application to
automatically respond to changes in load, ensuring that you have the necessary resources to
handle incoming requests.
Kubernetes also supports manual scaling, which allows you to increase or decrease the
number of pods in a Deployment on-demand. This can be useful for planned events, such as a
marketing campaign, where you expect a temporary increase in load.
3. Use Namespaces
In a large, complex application, organization is key. Kubernetes namespaces provide a way to
divide cluster resources between multiple users or teams. Each namespace provides a scope
for names, and the names of resources in one namespace do not overlap with the names in
other namespaces.
Using namespaces can greatly simplify the management of your microservices. By grouping
related services into the same namespace, you can manage them as a unit, applying policies
and access controls at the namespace level.
Health checks are a crucial part of maintaining a resilient and responsive application. They
allow Kubernetes to automatically replace pods that are not functioning correctly, ensuring
that your application remains available and responsive.
While Kubernetes does provide some of these capabilities out of the box, a service mesh
takes it to the next level, giving you fine-grained control over your service interactions.
Whether you choose Istio, Linkerd, or any other service mesh platform, it’s a powerful tool to
have in your Kubernetes toolbox.
In the context of microservices running on Kubernetes, a focused scope for each service
ensures easier scaling, monitoring, and management. Kubernetes allows you to specify
different scaling policies, resource quotas, and security configurations at the microservice
level. By ensuring that each microservice has a single responsibility, you can take full
advantage of these features, tailoring each aspect of the infrastructure to the specific needs of
each service.
Learn more in our detailed guide to microservices best practices (coming soon)
Microservices Delivery with
Codefresh
Codefresh helps you answer important questions within your organization, whether you’re a
developer or a product manager:
With Codefresh, you can answer all of these questions by viewing one dashboard, our
Applications Dashboard that can help you visualize an entire microservices application in one
glance:
The dashboard lets you view the following information in one place:
The microservices architecture advocates for dividing a single application into a suite of
small services, each running its process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms.
These services are built around business capabilities and independently deployable by fully
automated machinery. Moreover, there is a bare minimum of centralized management of
these services.
Microservices come with several advantages. They provide flexibility in using technologies
and scalability as per the requirement. They also offer better fault isolation: if one
microservice fails, the others will continue to work. However, managing, monitoring, and
debugging microservices can be complex.
What Is SOA?
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is an architectural pattern in which application
components provide services to other components. This is done through a communication
protocol, served over a network. The principles of SOA are vendor-agnostic and can apply to
any vendor, product, or technology.
SOA is all about reusing and sharing. This architecture is designed to enhance the efficiency
of existing IT systems while adding new functionalities. In SOA, services use protocols
which describe how they communicate with each other, involving specific policies and
contracts.
SOA was intended to allow greater agility. Since services are reused, the business can adapt
to changing conditions and requirements more quickly. However, it can be challenging to
implement SOA effectively due to the high upfront cost, the need for a shift in corporate
culture, and the necessity of a high level of discipline to maintain service interfaces and
quality over the long term.
In SOA, the architecture is often centered around an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) or
similar middleware, which can increase complexity, especially when used to integrate
monolithic applications. This style often results in centralized governance models and
standards that can be overly complex and inhibit change. However, some
implementations of SOA can resemble microservices, leading to the view that
microservices might be a form of SOA “done right.”
For instance, SOA is often used in large enterprises where different departments need to
share the same services. It’s also commonly used in scenarios where different businesses
need to integrate their systems.
For example, microservices are often used in eCommerce applications where different
services (like user management, product catalog, and order management) need to scale
independently based on their individual needs. They’re also commonly used in cloud-native
applications where rapid deployment and scaling are essential.
How to Choose?
The choice between SOA and Microservices often comes down to your specific needs and
context. Here are some factors to consider:
Modern architecture: Microservices is a more modern architecture, supported by a
wide range of tools and technologies, especially in the cloud native space. Prefer
microservices if you are building a new application and want to use the latest
technologies, especially if your application is cloud native.
Size and complexity of your systems: If you have a large, complex system that
requires integration of diverse applications, SOA might be a better choice. If you have
a smaller, more focused application that needs to scale and evolve rapidly,
microservices might be more suitable.
Need for reuse and sharing: If you need a high level of reuse and sharing of services
across different applications, SOA might be a better fit. If you need each service to
evolve independently, microservices might be a better choice.
Cultural and organizational fit: SOA requires a high level of discipline and a shift
in corporate culture to be successful. Microservices require a high level of
decentralization and autonomy. Make sure to consider whether your organization is
ready for these changes.
With Codefresh, you can answer all of these questions by viewing one dashboard, our
Applications Dashboard that can help you visualize an entire microservices application in one
glance:
The dashboard lets you view the following information in one place: