Department of

Economics
Jahangirnagar University

Term Paper on Multiple Regression Analysis

Course Name : Econometrics-I
Course Code : Econ 306

Course Instructor : Dr.Mohammad Safiqul Islam

Professor, Department of Economics
Jahangirnagar University

Prepared by: Shinthia Rahman

Roll : 2186
Session : 2019-2020

1
 Analysis of Bangladesh's annual GDP growth and key
indicators using multiple regression to reveal economic
dynamics.

Abstract:
Utilizing Multiple Regression Analysis, this study examines the dynamic interaction between the
annual GDP growth of Bangladesh and various key economic indicators. The study examines the
four key independent variables—Gross National Income (GNI), Gross National Savings (GNS),
Consumer Price Index (CPI), and GDP deflator—to understand the complex relationships that
influence the economic situation in Bangladesh.
Our analysis intends to statistically examine the impact of GNI, GNS, CPI, and GDP deflator on
the annual GDP growth of Bangladesh using a comprehensive dataset that covers relevant eras.
The study goes beyond analyzing the separate effects of each component and instead
investigates potential interactions and dependencies between them. This approach allows for a
more nuanced comprehension of how these variables collectively impact economic growth.

Introduction:
In the face of ongoing changes in the global economy, countries endeavor to unravel the
complex web of factors that impact their economic expansion. In this particular setting,
Bangladesh serves as an intriguing subject of analysis, as it deals with the difficulties and
advantages that come with its efforts to achieve consistent and strong economic growth
measured by GDP. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence the annual GDP
growth of Bangladesh. It utilizes a Multiple Regression Analysis framework that incorporates
important macroeconomic data.
Prior researches have contributed to the economic discourse on Bangladesh, providing insights
into many aspects of its economic processes. Sonia Rezina's analysis of the macroeconomic
interplay between money, income, and the price level stands out as a significant contribution. It
highlights the long-lasting influence of monetary policy on the economy of Bangladesh.
Furthermore, Arifuzzaman Khan and Sandip Sarker conducted an in-depth analysis of the
factors that influence gross domestic savings. They discovered causal connections between
gross domestic income, deposit interest rates, and economic development.
Moreover, the research conducted by Fatema Jannat, Mohammad Rubel Miah, Mohammad
Omar Faruk, and Shafiqul Alam focuses on the empirical examination of the factors that impact
the economic growth rate of Bangladesh. Their research highlights the crucial significance of

2
gross national income, remittances, and the import and export of goods in defining the nation's
economic growth. Umme Salma, Md. Mahmudul Hasan, and Mst Irin Sultana utilize a regression
model-based method to uncover the key determinants that determine GDP growth. Their
research provides valuable insights into the recent increase in GDP per capita in Bangladesh.
Ummya Salma's analysis of macroeconomic causes of inflation offers a thorough
comprehension of the factors that impact inflation in Bangladesh. The aim of our research is to
thoroughly examine the connections between GDP growth and four important independent
variables: Gross National Income (GNI), Gross National Savings (GNS), Consumer Price Index
(CPI), and GDP deflator. This analysis is conducted within the context of a wide range of
literature . By conducting a thorough empirical analysis using Multiple Regression Analysis, our
aim is to gain a detailed understanding of the specific elements that influence the growth of
Bangladesh's GDP.

Literature Review
Sonia Rezina examined the macro-economic relationship among money, income and the
price level in Bangladesh . This study examines the existence of a substantial and enduring
connection between the money supply, the price level (CPI), and GDP in the Bangladeshi
economy through the application of time-series econometric methods. The quarterly data from
1972: I to 2003. The analysis indicates that there is a consistent and enduring relationship,
where significant changes in monetary policy have noticeable effects on the whole economy.
The results suggest a persistent correlation between the money supply (M1), GDP, and the
Consumer Price Index (CPI).
This study investigates the causal links between income, money supply, and price level in
Bangladesh, both in the long-term and short-term. Eichenbaum (1997) argues that
implementing these monetary measures helps maintain a stable economic environment,
facilitating decision-making for economic actors. Monetary policy has been observed to have a
reasonably strong impact in the short term, as changes in the M1 money supply have a major
influence on both the price level and GDP. The policy implications underscore the significant
influence of monetary policy on economic activity in Bangladesh, since an expansion in the
money supply is linked to heightened economic activity and a rise in money demand. (Rezina,
The Macro-Economic Relationship among Money, Income and the Price Level in Bangladesh,
2016)
Arifuzzaman Khan and Sandip Sarker examined determinants of gross domestic savings in
Bangladesh: Evidence from Time Series Analysis. This study determines the association
between Gross Domestic Savings (GDS, deposit interest rate, gross domestic income, and
inflation in Bangladesh from 1983 to 2013. The analysis employs co-integration and Vector
Error Correction Model (VECM) techniques. The Johansen co-integration tests conducted by

3
Khan and Sarker (2016) indicate that all variables exhibit co-integration with two vectors.
Causal links have been identified in the short term between gross domestic income and GDS, as
well as between deposit interest rate and GDS. The impulse response function and variance
decomposition indicate that the deposit interest rate and gross domestic income have a
substantial impact on the fluctuations in economic development in Bangladesh. The results
suggest that the Gross Domestic Savings (GDS) in Bangladesh are strongly influenced by the
Gross National Income (GNI) and deposit interest rates, which, in turn, have an effect on
investment.
The results suggest that the Gross Domestic Savings (GDS) in Bangladesh are strongly
influenced by the country's Gross National Income (GNI) and the interest rates on deposits.
These factors, in turn, have an effect on investment. (Khan & Sarker, Determinants of Gross
Domestic Savings in Bangladesh: Evidence from Time Series Analysis, 2016)
Fatema Jannat , Mohammad Rubel Miah , Mohammad Omar Faruk, Shafiqul Alam examined
empirical analysis of factors influencing economic growth rate in Bangladesh . The present
research evaluates the determinants of Bangladesh's economic growth rate between 2000 and
2015, using data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Bivariate
research uncovers relationships among gross national income, export and import of
merchandise, foreign direct investment, population, remittances, and gross domestic product
(GDP). The multivariate study, performed using a multiple linear regression model, identifies
gross national income and remittances received as the most influential factors affecting GDP.
Furthermore, the study emphasizes the substantial influence of the export and import of goods
on the economic development of Bangladesh. The bivariate study reveals that factors such as
balance of payment, ICT import, and ICT export have weak associations with GDP. The findings
highlight the significance of particular elements in influencing Bangladesh's impressive
economic expansion.
The objective of this study is to ascertain the pivotal determinants that have had an impact on
the economic growth of Bangladesh over the period from 2000 to 2015. An examination is
undertaken on ten independent variables, followed by the analysis of both bivariate and
multivariate relationships. The findings indicate that the inflow of remittances, the export and
import of goods, and the gross national income (GNI) have a substantial influence on economic
growth. In contrast, GDP is not significantly affected by population, remittance pay, and foreign
direct investment (FDI). (Jannat, Miah, Faruk, & Alam, 2020)
Umme Salma, Md. Mahmudul Hasan, Mst Irin Sultana examined a regression model-based
approach to identifying determining factors for GDP growth in Bangladesh . This study
investigates the determinants of the recent increase in GDP per capita in Bangladesh and
constructs a forecasting model utilizing World Bank data from the World Development
Indicator (WDI) - 2019. The process involves creating many The findings demonstrate that the
regression-based model has substantial precision in predicting Bangladesh's GDP per capita,
hence providing valuable understanding of the factors contributing to the observed growth.
4
Nevertheless, the limitations encompass the management of incomplete data for the period of
1991-2018 and the exclusion of certain pertinent indicators from the dataset. The ultimate
model, utilizing the accessible data from the WDI-2019, exhibits satisfactory accuracy in
forecasting the GDP per capita in Bangladesh. (Salma, Hasan, & Sultana, 2020)
Ummya Salma examined macroeconomic determinants of inflation in Bangladesh .This study
examines the factors that influence inflation in Bangladesh throughout the period from 2009-10
to 2019-20. It specifically analyzes variables such broad money supply, foreign direct
investments, GDP growth, foreign exchange rates, and trade balance. The empirical research,
conducted using the Ordinary Least Squares method, demonstrates a positive and significant
correlation between inflation and broad money supply, foreign direct investments, and trade
balance.
The objective of this article is to identify correlations between inflation and important economic
variables, such as money supply, foreign direct investments, GDP growth, foreign exchange, and
trade balance. The study reveals robust correlations between the money supply, foreign direct
investments, and trade balance in influencing inflation rates. In addition, exogenous factors
such as worldwide pricing, interest rates, unforeseen events, and oil prices also influence the
overall price level and consumer price index. The findings offer useful insights for regulators to
discern factors that influence inflation and formulate efficient fiscal and monetary policies.
(Salma U. , 2021)

Source Of Data: This study utilizes an extensive secondary time series dataset obtained from
the World Bank Data Bank, spanning the years 1971 to 2022. Our analysis centers on the
economic dynamics of Bangladesh and includes annual time series data for indicators such as
GDP growth, GNI, GNS, CPI, and Inflation (GDP deflator). Through the utilization of Multiple
Regression Analysis, our objective is to uncover the complex connections between these crucial
indicators.

Methodology: To analyze the variables, we use quantitative approaches .By Linear Regression
Analysis ,we are going to determine the significances of variables and the models. For multiple linear
regression analysis ,we will take four models, they are :

Level-Level Model
1. Log-Level Model
2. Level-Log Model
3. Log-Log Model
We’re using Stata17 software for the Linear Regression Analysis.
Here, the dependent variable is GDPgrowth_annual and the independent variables are
Gross_savingsofGDP, GNIgrowth_annual, Inflation_GDPdeflator_annual, CPI_2010100.

5
So, The population regression function :
(PRF):(GDPgrowth_annual)=β1+β2(Gross_savingsofGDP)+β3(GNIgrowth_annual)
+β4(Inflation_GDPdeflator_annual)+β5( CPI_2010100)+ ui
And the Sample Regression Function :
SRF: (GDPgrowth_annual)=β̂1+β̂2(Gross_savingsofGDP)+β̂3(GNIgrowth_annual)
+β̂4(Inflation_GDPdeflator_annual)+β̂5( CPI_2010100)i+ûi

Command Used In Stata:

1. regress GDPgrowthannual GrosssavingsofGDP GNIgrowthannual
InflationGDPdeflatorannual CPI2010100
2. regress ln_GDPgrowthannual GrosssavingsofGDP GNIgrowthannual
InflationGDPdeflatorannual CPI2010100
3. regress GDPgrowthannual ln_GrosssavingsofGDP ln_GNIgrowthannual
ln_InflationGDPdeflatorannual ln_CPI2010100
4. regress ln_GDPgrowthannual ln_GrosssavingsofGDP ln_GNIgrowthannual
ln_InflationGDPdeflatorannual ln_CPI2010100

Findings:
1. Level-Level Model :

Here,

6
β̂1 = 0.8017467 means ,when all the independent variables remain constant GDP growth (annual
%) will increase 0.8017467 unit annually.
β̂2 = -0.013865 means ,when Gross savings (% of GDP) increases by 1unit, GDP growth (annual
%) decreases by 0.013865 unit annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂3 = 0.7439898 means , when GNI growth (annual %) increases by 1unit, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 0.7439898 uinit annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂4 = 0.0464523 means , when Inflation GDP deflator (annual %) increases by 1unit, GDP growth
(annual %) increases by 0.0464523 unit annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂5 = 0.0075941 means , when CPI (2010 = 100) increases by 1unit, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 0.0075941 unit annually , while other variables remain constant.
R2 = 0.8776 means these four independent variables have strong effect of the dependent variable.
Model-Fit Statistics :

Here, Number of observations : 37 and df=33; So.we get t tab = 2.035 from the t distribution
table.
Now, for β2 : Let,
H o : β2 = 0
H A : β2 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = -0.63< ttab=2.035.
That’s why we don’t reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Gross savings (% of GDP) is
not a significant variable.
Now, for β3: Let,
H o : β3 = 0
H A : β3 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 9.88>ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that GNI growth (annual %) is a
significant variable.
Now, for β4: Let,
H o : β4 = 0
H A : β4 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 2.56>ttab=2.035.

7
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Inflation GDP deflator (annual %)
is a significant variable.
Now, for β5: Let,
H o : β5 = 0
H A : β5 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 3.25>ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that CPI (2010 = 100) is a significant
variable.
Now ,In case of the Model, Let,
Ho:β2= β3= β4 = β5=0
Ha:β2= β3= β4 = β5≠0
From the F distribution table we get , Ftab = 8.46
From the LRA table we can see that , Fcal = 57.34, which states Fcal>Ftab.
So,we reject the null hypothesis and we can say that the model is significant.

2.Level-Log Model :

Here,
β̂1 = 0.4371775 means ,when all the independent variables remain constant GDP growth (annual
%) will increase 0.4371775 unit annually.

8
β̂2 = -1.94694 means ,when Gross savings (% of GDP) increases by 1%, GDP growth (annual %)
decreases by -1.94694 unit annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂3 = 3.792645 means , when GNI growth (annual %) increases by 1%, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 3.792645 uinit annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂4 = 0.253666 means , when Inflation GDP deflator (annual %) increases by 1%, GDP growth
(annual %) increases by 0.253666 unit annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂5 = 1.140083 means , when CPI (2010 = 100) increases by 1%, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 1.140083 unit annually , while other variables remain constant.
R2 = 0.9015 means these four independent variables have strong effect of the dependent variable.

Model-Fit Statistics :

Here, Number of observations : 37 and df=33; So.we get t tab = 2.035 from the t distribution
table.
Now, for β2 : Let,
H o : β2 = 0
H A : β2 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = -2.42< ttab=2.035.
That’s why we don’t reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Gross savings (% of GDP) is
not a significant variable.
Now, for β3: Let,
H o : β3 = 0
H A : β3 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 10.93>ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that GNI growth (annual %) is a
significant variable.
Now, for β4: Let,
H o : β4 = 0
H A : β4 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 2.36>ttab=2.035.

9
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Inflation GDP deflator (annual %)
is a significant variable.
Now, for β5: Let,
H o : β5 = 0
H A : β5 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 4.46>ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that CPI (2010 = 100) is a significant
variable.
Now ,In case of the Model, Let,
Ho:β2= β3= β4 = β5=0
Ha:β2= β3= β4 = β5≠0
From the F distribution table we get , Ftab = 8.46
From the LRA table we can see that , Fcal = 73.18, which states Fcal>Ftab.
So,we reject the null hypothesis and we can say that the model is significant.

3.Log-Level Model :

Here,

10
β̂1 = 0.6878727 means ,when all the independent variables remain constant GDP growth (annual
%) will increase 0.6878727 % annually.
β̂2 = -0.0009303 means ,when Gross savings (% of GDP) increases by 1unit, GDP growth
(annuaβ̂l %) decreases by -0.0009303 % annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂3 = 0.1546406 means , when GNI growth (annual %) increases by 1unit, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 0.1546406 % annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂4 = 0.0083219 means, when Inflation GDP deflator (annual %) increases by 1unit, GDP growth
(annual %) increases by 0.0083219 % annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂5 = 0.0010881 means, when CPI (2010 = 100) increases by 1unit, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 0.0010881 % annually , while other variables remain constant.
R2 = 0.8329 means these four independent variables have strong effect of the dependent variable.

Model-Fit Statistics :

Here, Number of observations: 37 and df=33; So. we get t tab = 2.035 from the t distribution
table.
Now, for β2 : Let,
H o : β2 = 0
H A : β2 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = -0.18< ttab=2.035.
That’s why we don’t reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Gross savings (% of GDP) is
not a significant variable.
Now, for β3: Let,
H o : β3 = 0
H A : β3 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 8.57>ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that GNI growth (annual %) is a
significant variable.
Now, for β4: Let,
H o : β4 = 0
H A : β4 ≠ 0

11
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 1.92<ttab=2.035.
That’s why we do not reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Inflation GDP deflator
(annual %) is not a significant variable.
Now, for β5: Let,
H o : β5 = 0
H A : β5 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 1.94<ttab=2.035.
That’s why we do not reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that CPI (2010 = 100) is not a
significant variable.
Now ,In case of the Model, Let,
Ho:β2= β3= β4 = β5=0
Ha:β2= β3= β4 = β5≠0
From the F distribution table we get , Ftab = 8.46
From the LRA table we can see that , Fcal = 39.86, which states Fcal>Ftab.
So,we reject the null hypothesis and we can say that the model is significant.

4.Log-Log Model :

12
Here,
β̂1 = 0.5542147 means ,when all the independent variables remain constant GDP growth (annual
%) will increase 0.5542147 % annually.
β̂2 = -0.3374168 means ,when Gross savings (% of GDP) increases by 1%, GDP growth (annual %)
decreases by -0.3374168 % annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂3 = 0.8275853 means , when GNI growth (annual %) increases by 1%, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 0. 0.8275853 % annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂4 = 0.0415231 means , when Inflation GDP deflator (annual %) increases by 1%, GDP growth
(annual %) increases by 0.0415231 % annually ,while other variables remain constant.
β̂5 = 0.1879824 means , when CPI (2010 = 100) increases by 1%, GDP growth (annual %)
increases by 0.1879824% annually , while other variables remain constant.
R2 = 0.9026 means these four independent variables have strong effect of the dependent variable.

Model-Fit Statistics :

Here, Number of observations : 37 and df=33; So.we get t tab = 2.035 from the t distribution
table.
Now, for β2 : Let,
H o : β2 = 0
H A : β2 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = -2.05 < ttab=2.035.
That’s why we don’t reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Gross savings (% of GDP) is
not a significant variable.
Now, for β3: Let,
H o : β3 = 0
H A : β3 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 11.70 > ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that GNI growth (annual %) is a
significant variable.
Now, for β4: Let,
H o : β4 = 0

13
H A : β4 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 1.90<ttab=2.035.
That’s why we do not reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that Inflation GDP deflator
(annual %) is not a significant variable.
Now, for β5: Let,
H o : β5 = 0
H A : β5 ≠ 0
From the LRA table we can see that , tcal = 3.61>ttab=2.035.
That’s why we reject the null hypothesis . So, we can say that CPI (2010 = 100) is a significant
variable.
Now ,In case of the Model, Let,
Ho:β2= β3= β4 = β5=0
Ha:β2= β3= β4 = β5≠0
From the F distribution table we get , Ftab = 8.46
From the LRA table we can see that , Fcal = 74.14, which states Fcal > Ftab.
So,we reject the null hypothesis and we can say that the model is significant.

Conclusion : To summarise, this extensive analysis conducted over a period of fifty years
demonstrates a strong and complex connection between important economic indices in
Bangladesh. The interdependence of GDP and Gross National Income (GNI), Gross National
Savings (GNS), Consumer Price Index (CPI), and GDP deflator is highlighted by the bidirectional
link established. These elements collectively influence the trajectory of Bangladesh's economy.
The t-tests and F-tests have demonstrated statistically significant and positive connections
between GDP growth and Gross National Income (GNI), Consumer Price Index (CPI), and GDP
deflator. key findings highlight the crucial role of economic growth in influencing key aspects of
the country's economic environment. This observation emphasises the interconnected and
comprehensive character of economic development, where modifications in one area have a
ripple effect on others.
The found inverse relationship between GDP and Gross National Savings highlights a subtle
facet of Bangladesh's economic dynamics, indicating that changes in savings patterns might
affect the overall economic performance. This discovery acts as a crucial indicator for

14
policymakers to contemplate a well-rounded strategy in economic policies, recognising the
interdependence of many economic variables.
The importance of making well-informed decisions cannot be overstated, and utilising the
knowledge gained from this research can aid in developing successful policies aimed at
achieving sustainable economic expansion. In order to promote resilience and prosperity for
Bangladesh and its population, it is crucial to comprehend the complex interconnections among
these factors as the country progresses on its economic path.

15
Country Name Bangladesh Bangladesh Bangladesh Bangladesh Bangladesh
Country Code BGD BGD BGD BGD BGD
Time GDP growth (annual %) Gross savings (% of GDP) GNI growth (annual %) Inflation, GDP deflator (annual %) Consumer price index (2010 = 100)
1971 [YR1971] -5.479483027 .. .. 2.963254932 ..
1972 [YR1972] -13.9737287 .. .. 4.402019652 ..
1973 [YR1973] 3.325680199 .. .. 61.40578328 ..
1974 [YR1974] 9.5919563 .. 9.306639152 44.5427169 ..
1975 [YR1975] -4.088214092 .. -4.238946687 80.5697564 ..
1976 [YR1976] 5.661361201 -0.840906616 5.57106677 -17.63041929 ..
1977 [YR1977] 2.67305605 10.03992261 2.295495294 -3.210155929 ..
1978 [YR1978] 7.073837733 5.704443543 7.207566329 25.61888559 ..
1979 [YR1979] 4.801634601 7.076281516 4.96910443 12.56450599 ..
1980 [YR1980] 0.819141869 8.332931314 1.168465239 17.55506709 ..
1981 [YR1981] 7.233943695 21.14318205 9.275869704 9.894690312 ..
1982 [YR1982] 2.134327836 23.52848225 2.110828009 9.855812463 ..
1983 [YR1983] 3.8810464 23.09953972 5.172890207 8.487755878 ..
1984 [YR1984] 4.803310015 16.29489054 4.604548798 7.875566349 ..
1985 [YR1985] 3.342014654 21.52029364 2.237514885 18.4951157 ..
1986 [YR1986] 4.173382559 22.77606457 4.491832336 8.254404894 24.28000283
1987 [YR1987] 3.772401853 22.62537719 4.199970201 11.11963117 26.67757932
1988 [YR1988] 2.416256856 22.19589584 2.35330157 7.495835297 28.65512584
1989 [YR1989] 2.836582129 22.34616801 2.753542006 8.33797325 30.38746567
1990 [YR1990] 5.622258162 23.02441186 5.421635034 6.532735292 32.24922014
1991 [YR1991] 3.485227816 22.56040592 3.507600067 2.729531995 34.29942049
1992 [YR1992] 5.44268555 21.99400383 5.718143684 2.5821619 35.54588781
1993 [YR1993] 4.711561725 20.90120214 4.979278814 0.155518173 36.61753185
1994 [YR1994] 3.890126441 22.41716006 4.357413599 3.966216316 38.56329232
1995 [YR1995] 5.121277897 22.14615449 4.995857986 7.144938703 42.53446758
1996 [YR1996] 4.522919217 23.13879408 4.013489376 19.14321311 43.54556676
1997 [YR1997] 4.489896498 24.3974787 4.657611194 3.800232201 45.85592081
1998 [YR1998] 5.177026873 25.83405473 5.176932649 4.736212562 49.70884439
1999 [YR1999] 4.670156369 26.65995682 4.866529588 3.781037737 52.74441235
2000 [YR2000] 5.293294719 27.79745769 5.489339086 3.446659349 53.90914412
2001 [YR2001] 5.077287775 28.42229043 4.862759653 3.261160132 54.9911943
2002 [YR2002] 3.83312394 30.74917643 4.773134138 3.892867435 56.82381156
2003 [YR2003] 4.7395674 30.1645967 4.7531041 5.815816648 60.04498736
2004 [YR2004] 5.23953291 31.57740067 5.627141938 4.56213638 64.60092262
2005 [YR2005] 6.535944939 32.3626785 6.647094399 4.586360706 69.15310297
2006 [YR2006] 6.671904986 35.33850447 7.99693762 5.875935811 73.83149099
2007 [YR2007] 7.058599354 36.31743462 7.828359316 6.471260105 80.55531378
2008 [YR2008] 6.013789757 37.38253287 7.152478292 7.860966094 87.72630342
2009 [YR2009] 5.045124799 38.97611981 5.254780361 6.764354681 92.48411524
2010 [YR2010] 5.571788185 38.78147102 5.782655457 7.144663028 100
2011 [YR2011] 6.464379125 38.05723258 6.242403675 7.859450853 111.3951652
2012 [YR2012] 6.521458779 40.59589105 6.980267618 8.164573676 118.3211643
2013 [YR2013] 6.013605658 39.74593084 5.597279761 7.174953432 127.2312288
2014 [YR2014] 6.061059359 37.77929374 4.692012187 5.668788525 136.1267769
2015 [YR2015] 6.552639878 36.73377423 6.354337866 5.872777041 144.5588509
2016 [YR2016] 7.113478213 37.2800608 5.395267333 27.85073772 152.5291403
2017 [YR2017] 6.590254815 35.2848394 5.315842216 5.047597354 161.2264589
2018 [YR2018] 7.31940778 35.45878774 7.925873852 5.80552697 170.1642434
2019 [YR2019] 7.881906729 36.35349609 7.907854856 3.658167964 179.6798217
2020 [YR2020] 3.448025628 37.19009998 3.524300082 3.841044724 189.9055347
2021 [YR2021] 6.938679124 36.05126382 8.065670852 4.121174707 200.4370392
2022 [YR2022] 7.099828776 33.95726324 5.802403624 5.049021879 215.8645866

16
References
(n.d.). Retrieved from 1.
https://www.academia.edu/3848322/Determinants_of_Gross_Investment_In_Bangladesh_A_Ti
me_Series_Evidence

Jannat, F., Miah, M. R., Faruk, M. O., & Alam, S. (2020). Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing
Economic. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 9, 78-82.
doi:10.11648/j.ijber.20200902.14

Khan, A., & Sarker, S. (2016). Determinants of Gross Domestic Savings in Bangladesh: Evidence from
Time Series Analysis. Proceedings of Dhaka International Business and Social Science Research
Conference, Westin Hotel, 333-352.

Khan, A., & Sarker, S. (2016, 1 20-22). Determinants of Gross Domestic Savings in Bangladesh: Evidence
from Time Series Analysis. Retrieved from Proceedings of Dhaka International Business and
Social Science Research Conference, Westin Hotel and Uttara University, Dhaka, Bangladesh:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293644858_Determinants_of_Gross_Domestic_Savi
ngs_in_Bangladesh_Evidence_from_Time_Series_Analysis

Rezina, S. (2016). The Macro-Economic Relationship among Money, Income and the Price Level in
Bangladesh. British Journal of Business Design & Education, 1-11. Retrieved from
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2880407

Rezina, S. (2016, 12 7). The Macro-Economic Relationship among Money, Income and the Price Level in
Bangladesh. Retrieved from British Journal of Business Design & Education:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2880407

Rezina, S. (2016, 12 7). The Macro-Economic Relationship Among Money, Income and the Price Level in
Bangladesh. Retrieved from British Journal of Business Design and Education: Rezina, Sonia, The
Macro-Economic Relationship Among Money, Income and the Price Level in Bangladesh
(December 1, 2016). British Journalhttps://ssrn.com/abstract=2880407

Salma, U. (2021). Macroeconomic Determinants of Inflation in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business

and Management Research, 6(5), 264-267. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.5.1116

Salma, U., Hasan, M. M., & Sultana, M. I. (2020). A Regression Model-Based Approach to Identifying
Determining Factors for GDP Growth in Bangladesh. International Conference on Emerging
Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ic-ETITE), 1-6. doi: 10.1109/ic-
ETITE47903.2020.392

17
18