ASD Particular Specification
ASD Particular Specification
ASD Particular Specification
1.0 Definition
A jacked steel H pile is installed by jacking a steel H-pile section into the ground
against a machine of sufficient dead weight to achieve the penetration and resistance
required for the designed bearing capacity.
2.0 General
This Particular Specification shall be read in conjunction with Section 5 of the General
Specification for Building 2017 Edition (GS).
The notations and terms used in this Particular Specification (PS) are defined as follows:
Pre-Loading Test - the test carried out at the 2nd stage of the Pre-Loading process as
required in Clause 6.10.
In addition to the submissions stated in Clause 5.02 of the GS, submit 2 copies of each
of the following with the design submissions:-
(a) Detailed information on the jacking machine and associated equipment, which shall
include the maximum capacity of the jacking machine, details of the load
controlling device and the pile clamping system, as stated in Clause 6.4.
(b) Method statement for the installation of jacked steel H-piles as stated in Clause 6.3.
(c) Settlement analysis for pile groups consisting of more than 10 piles, as required in
Clause 5.3.
No piling works shall commence on site unless the submissions are approved by the SO.
Clause 5.18 (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix) of the GS shall apply to Jacked Steel
H-piles.
The allowable load capacity of a pile shall not exceed 2950 kN.
The pile group reduction of 0.85 stipulated in Clause 5.07 of the GS shall apply.
For pile groups consisting of more than 10 piles, a proper settlement analysis
of foundations under the total working loads including negative skin friction
(NSF) shall be carried out by a recognized foundation engineering method.
The assumed parameters are to be verified at the contractor’s own expense.
After installation of all piles, a further settlement analysis, based on actual
conditions of piles installed, shall be carried out to verify the compliance of
settlement requirements.
The maximum jacking force Pmax shall not exceed 90% of total weight of the
pile-jacking machine. The allowable axial stress during pile jacking shall not
exceed 80% of the yield stress of the H-pile material. A control system should
be in place to control the jacking force within ±2% accuracy. .
Submit method statement for the calibration of hydraulic jack for SO’s
approval before calibration.
Submit method statement for installation of piles for SO’s approval before
jacking of any pile. The method statement should include but not be limited to
the following:-
Submit details of the hydraulic jacking machine for jacking of the piles. The
details shall include but not be limited to the following:-
The verification test of jacking force can be carried out either during or after
the Pre-Loading process as required in Clause 6.10 (ii) as directed by the SO.
The control panel shall be installed in a convenient and safe position for
inspection by the SO.
At any time during jacking, gaps between the steel-H pile and the pile hole shall
be kept filled up with sand.
Before a pile can be terminated for installation, the pile shall undergo a Pre-
Loading process. The Contractor shall propose his termination procedures and
criteria for the Pre-Loading process which shall consist at least of the following:
(i) Before termination of a pile, the pile shall be first jacked to a force of
not less than 2.3WL and hold for a certain period of time to be
determined by the Contractor. The pre-loading shall be repeated to a no.
of cycles to be determined by the Contractor.
(ii) The 2nd stage of the Pre-Loading process is a Pre-Loading Test which
shall be carried out at a force of 2.2WL until the settlement rate is less
than 5mm per 15 minutes. The total and residual settlements of the pile
shall also be measured in the presence of the SO’s supervisory staff and
the records should all be certified by the SO’s supervisory staff.
The Contractor may propose any other additional steps of Pre-Loading process
as he considers necessary.
A trial pile shall be installed to verify the termination procedures and criteria
proposed by the Contractor. In the trial pile, the forces applied on the pile
shall be measured by a calibrated load cell while the settlement of the pile shall
be measured by dial gauges or other precision optical instrument with an
accuracy of +/- 0.1mm.
The trial pile shall then be subjected to a static loading test as instructed by the
SO. Acceptance of the loading test is based on Clause 5.29(ii) to (iv) of the GS.
If the trial pile fails the static loading test, either the trial pile shall undergo the
Pre-Loading process in accordance with revised termination procedures and
criteria to be proposed by the Contractor and then load tested again for
verification, or the allowable load capacity has to be reduced. In the latter case,
a new trial pile has to be installed in accordance with revised termination
procedures and criteria to be proposed by the Contractor and then load tested to
twice the reduced allowable load capacity for verification. .
All working piles have to undergo a Pre-Loading process by the amount and
sequence determined from the trial pile. The total and residual settlements of all
working piles during the Pre-Loading process shall also be measured.
6.12 Monitoring of settlement and elastic shortening of piles during the Pre-
Loading Test
The total and residual settlements of every pile during the Pre-Loading Test
under the termination procedures shall be measured by optical surveying
equipment with an accuracy of +/- 0.1mm or dial gauges. The elastic
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 5 of 7 File code: SEI0708(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 07/08 KTL/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: December 2008 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: November 2017
shortening (δ) of a pile during the Pre-Loading Test is defined as the difference
between the measured total and residual settlements of the pile under the Pre-
Loading force. The value of elastic shortening (mm)/total pile length (m) (δ/L)
of every pile shall be reported.
Any piles with δ/L less than the average value of δ/L of all tested piles
determined from the verification test of jacking force (Clause 6.6) and re-
calibration of the hydraulic jack (Clause 6.2.2) by more than 15% of the
average value shall be subjected to a verification test as stated in Clause 6.6.
The Contractor shall satisfy himself that the above method of pile installation
provides sufficient factor of safety in his design. Should he consider that this
method does not provide an adequate factor of safety in his design, he shall
submit an alternative proposal for the approval of the SO.
The Contractor shall keep records of the installation of each pile and submit two signed
copies of the records to the SO not later than noon of the next working day after the pile
has been installed. The record shall contain the following information in an approved
format: -
On completion of all piling works, the Contractor shall submit to the SO two sets of
piling record plans showing, as appropriate, the position, pile reference number, size,
orientation and levels of top and bottom of each pile installed. The as-built piling
record plans shall be certified by both the Contractor and an independent qualified
surveyor employed by the Contractor at his own cost.
Loading tests shall be required as instructed by the SO in accordance with Clause 5.29
of the GS. Notwithstanding the provisions given in Clause 5.29 of the GS, kentledge
for loading tests may be provided by the weight of the jacking machine subject to
approval by the SO.
When a pile fails a loading test, carry out remedial works to the pile or install
additional piles such that the revised piling layout is sufficient to sustain the loadings
as given in the loading schedule. Carry out test probes if required to position
additional piles. Design extended or extra pile caps and strap beams and any other
work necessitated by the pile failure. The agreement of the SO in writing shall be
sought before carrying out the remedial works. The Contractor shall carry out two
additional pile-loading tests as directed by the SO at the Contractor’s own cost and
time.
Alternatively, the failed pile can be subjected to a revised termination procedures and
criteria proposed by the Contractor and then load tested again for verification at the
Contractor’s own cost and time. The batch of piles of which this pile is representative
have to undergo the same termination procedures and criteria.
1.0 Definition
Large Diameter Bored Piles Socketed into Bedrock are those of a diameter
exceeding 750 mm formed by boring, chiselling or grabbing, plus filling with
concrete. The embedment depth into bedrock shall be greater than 600 mm and
formed by reverse circulation drill (RCD) or other method approved by the
Supervising Officer (SO).
The allowable load capacity of large diameter bored piles socketed into
granitic and volcanic bedrock may be taken as the sum of the frictional
resistance of the rock socket and the end bearing resistance of the piles
provided that the socket length used in the calculation of frictional
resistance does not exceed 2 pile diameters or 6 m, whichever is the
shorter. However, the contribution from the minimum embedment depth
of 600mm stipulated in Clause 5.19 (iii) of the General Specification for
Building (GS) shall not be counted in the calculation of frictional
resistance (i.e. the top level of effective rock socket shall be 600 mm
below the bedrock level).
If both Grade II or better rock and Grade III rock are present in the
bedrock, the lower grade of rock (i.e. Grade III) should be assumed in
the calculation of shaft friction.
OR
The Contractor shall satisfy himself that the above method of calculating
the allowable load capacity provides sufficient factor of safety in his
design. Should he consider that this method does not provide an
adequate factor of safety in his design, he shall submit an alternative
method of calculations for the approval of the SO.
In the design of pile capacity, combining the rock socket side resistance
and bell-out at the pile base to increase the load-carrying capacity shall
not be allowed. For bell-out piles, the side resistance of rock socket shall
be ignored.
Drill hole(s) (one for pile diameter less than or equal to 2.5 m and two
for pile diameter greater than 2.5 m) shall be sunk at each bored pile
position to determine the pile founding level and rock properties. The
location of drill hole(s) shall be agreed by the SO. For this purpose,
continuous rock core samples of N size with length not less than 5 m or
1.5 pile diameters plus the rock socket length plus 600 mm, whichever
is the greater, shall be taken below the bedrock level for inspection and
testing. Rock specimens shall be taken at top, middle and bottom along
the length of rock core samples for point load test to determine the
uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock. However, this predicted
founding level cannot be considered as final and the actual rock quality
at base of pile should be inspected and verified during pile excavation
before approval.
3.0 Controlling and Monitoring the Verticality and Alignment of Bored Piles
The Contractor shall submit a detailed method statement and procedures for
controlling and monitoring the verticality and alignment of piles for the SO’s
approval before commencement of pile installation.
During the pile installation, tolerance for verticality of each pile shall be
frequently checked as directed by the SO. In case the deviation exceeding the
allowable tolerance, the Contractor shall propose method of rectification for the
SO’s approval prior to further pile installation.
In addition to those stated in GS Clause 5.02 and Clause 3.0 of this Particular
Specification, the Contractor may submit for SO’s approval the information on
the proposed materials, method of installation for piling works and quality
control measures prior to the piling design submissions.
1.0 Definition
Large Diameter Bored Piles with Bell-outs are piles of a shaft diameter
exceeding 750 mm formed by boring, chiselling or grabbing with an enlarged
base formed by under-reaming, plus filling with concrete. The bell-out at the
pile base shall be formed within the bedrock with the use of a reverse circulation
drill (RCD) incorporating an under-reaming head.
The allowable load capacity of large diameter bored piles with bell-outs
shall be the allowable bearing pressure on bedrock times the pile base
area. Combining the end-bearing capacity and rock socket side
resistance to increase the load-carrying capacity shall not be allowed.
(a) 5 MPa for Grade III or better rock (granite and volcanic) with
total core recovery greater than 85% for any one metre within the rock
mass and minimum uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) not less than
25 MPa (equivalent point load index strength PLI50 not less than 1 MPa)
(b) 7.5 MPa for Grade II or better rock (granite and volcanic) with
total core recovery greater than 95% for any one metre within the rock
mass and minimum uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) not less than
50 MPa (equivalent point load index strength PLI50 not less than 2 MPa)
The point load index strength of rock is the equivalent value for 50 mm
diameter cores.
(c) 3 MPa for Grade III or better meta-sedimentary rock with total
core recovery greater than 85% for any one metre within the rock mass.
The use of the above presumptive values does not preclude the
requirement for consideration of settlement of the structure.
OR
The Contractor shall satisfy himself that the above method of calculating
the allowable load capacity provides sufficient factor of safety in his
design. Should he consider that this method does not provide an
adequate factor of safety in his design, he shall submit an alternative
method of calculations for the approval of the Supervising Officer (SO).
3.0 Testing
4.0 Controlling and Monitoring the Verticality, Alignment and bell-out size of
Bored Piles
The Contractor shall submit a detailed method statement and procedures for
controlling and monitoring the verticality, alignment and bell-out size of bored
piles. Site demonstration on reamer operation shall be carried out on site to
establish the reference mark for developing the movement relation between
bell-out bit and drive shaft. The detailed method statement, procedures and site
demonstration shall be approved by SO before commencement of pile
installation.
During the pile installation, the drive shaft reference mark shall be checked and
monitored to ensure the bell-out size formed by the bell-out bit is in accordance
with the design and approved method statement.
In addition to those stated in GS Clause 5.02 and Clause 4.0 of this Particular
Specification, the Contractor may submit for SO’s approval the information on
the proposed materials, method of installation for piling works and quality
control measures prior to the piling design submissions.
1.0 Definitions
1.1 Non-percussion cast in-situ concrete piles are piles with diameters not
exceeding 610 mm and are either:
1.2 For the purpose of this Particular Specification (PS) the following definitions
apply:
Incremental grout factor for 1.5 m increment - Actual grout volume placed
divided by theoretical grout
volume for the 1.5 m
increment.
Total grout factor - Actual grout volume placed divided by theoretical grout
volume of pile.
2.1 General
2.2.2 Equipment
The augering equipment shall have adequate torque and down force to
turn and advance the augers of specified diameter to the designed depth
and maintain adequate penetration speed.
The auger flight shall be continuous from the auger top to the tip
without gaps or other breaks. The auger flight shall be uniform in
diameter throughout its length and shall be of the diameter specified for
the piles less a maximum of 3 percent. The auger cutting teeth shall be
regularly inspected for wear and shall be replaced if the above specified
reduction in diameter tolerance occurs.
The grout pump shall be provided with an operable pressure gauge and
stroke counter in clear view of the equipment operator. The grout pump
shall be calibrated at the beginning of the work to determine the volume
2.2.3.1 Fluidity
Fluidity shall be checked for sample from each truckload of grout using
a flow cone in accordance with ASTM C 939. A 19 mm diameter
flowcone shall be used. Flow rates shall be within the range of 10 to 25
seconds. The sample for performing the fluidity check should be
obtained from the ready mix truck chute.
Two grout cubes of 100 mm size shall be made for each pile for
unconfined compression testing. Additional sets of cubes should be
made on any batch of grout used in piles, which appears to deviate
from project criteria including placement beyond time limit. The grout
sample used to make the compressive testing specimens should be
representative of the material in the pile and may be obtained from the
grout pump hopper at the time of pumping, the auger or the pile itself.
The Contractor shall sample each truckload of grout directly from the
pump hopper using a 225 to 350 mL capacity disposable glass or cup
when the grout truck reaches the site to evaluate premature setting or
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch. SD Page 3 of 11 File code:SEI 04/10.doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2010 MKW
Issue Date : 17 March 2010 Revision Date :
“initial set” of the grout mix. The grout shall not be used if the initial
set has occurred and it is considered that this has occurred when the
grout begins assuming the shape of the container when tilted from the
vertical.
2.2.4.1 Advance the auger at a continuous rate that prevents removal of excess
soil which can result in reduction of horizontal effective stress and
relative density in the soil around the pile being installed and
previously installed piles nearby, lateral movement of soil towards the
hole, and ground subsidence at the surface. Stop advancement after
reaching the required embedment depth.
2.2.4.2 Prior to raising the auger, a minimum theoretical initial grout head of
2 m shall be pumped. The grout quantity shall be determined by
counting pump strokes and using the pre-determined grout volume per
pump stroke. Positive (clockwise) rotation of the auger shall be
maintained at all times during placement of the grout. The rate of
grout injection and auger withdrawal shall be coordinated so as to
maintain:
(ii) The grout factor for each 1.5 m increment, which shall be not
less than the smallest 1.5 m incremental grout factor obtained
during the trial pile installation and in no case less than 1.15.
(iv) The total grout factor, which shall be not less than the value
established during trial pile installation and in no case less than
1.4.
2.2.4.4 If the volume of grout placed in any 1.5 m increment result in the
incremental grout factor less than the minimum value observed in the
trial pile installation, the auger shall be lowered 1.5 m or to the bottom
of the pile if that is less, followed by controlled auger withdrawal
while maintaining grout injection.
2.2.4.6 The grout shall be cast at least 600 mm above the specified cut-off
level.
2.2.4.7 The excess spoil that accumulates around the auger due to the drilling
process and grout injection shall be promptly cleared away.
2.2.4.9 Adjacent piles closer than 6 pile diameters shall not be placed within
24 hours of each other.
2.2.5 Non-Conformity
For piles not conforming to any specified requirements (e.g. grout-return depth
and/or total grout factor), the Contractor shall lower the auger to the bottom of
the pile while the grout is still fluid and regrout the hole. Otherwise, the
Contractor shall demonstrate to the SO that the piles in doubt can sustain the
design loading. All tests for this purpose shall be at the Contractor’s own
expense and no extension of time shall be granted whatsoever.
2.2.6 Obstructions
(i) For a pile closer than 6 pile diameters from any completed pile – to
grout the hole above the obstruction in accordance with this PS and
relocate the pile.
(ii) For a pile with distance greater than 6 pile diameters from any
completed pile – to remove the obstruction by a method approved by
the SO, backfill the hole with sand before reconstruction of the pile.
However, in the estimation of pile length, the positive shaft friction
During the trial pile installation, the total grout factor and the grout factor for
each 1.5 m increment of the trial piles shall be recorded. All working piles
shall be designed and constructed based on the performance of the trial piles
passing the static loading test.
For each PIP pile, install a single u-PVC access pipe with an internal diameter
of 40 mm attaching to the centre of reinforcing steel cage. The length of
access pipe should be equal to that of the reinforcing steel cage and filled with
water. Sonic logging should be performed about 3 days after the pile has
been installed.
These piles are formed by augering with a temporary casing used to stabilise
the surrounding soil. The pile shaft shall be filled with concrete of Grade 25 or
higher. The maximum aggregate size for the concrete shall be 10 mm. The
casing shall be withdrawn slowly while maintaining a sufficient head of
concrete in the pile shaft to prevent the caving in of surrounding soil. The
actual volume of concrete cast shall be compared with the theoretical volume
2.3.2 Obstructions
The theoretical safe loading capacity of individual pile shall be the sum of
allowable skin friction capacity of the pile (qs) and the allowable end bearing
capacity of the pile (qa):
= µ Nav P L + 5 N A (1)
Note: Shaft friction in filling materials and marine deposits shall be ignored.
It should be noted that the methods of calculating the theoretical safe loading
capacity are intended as guidance for general cases. The Contractor shall build
in a greater margin of safety in his design where necessary, having regard to
the subsoil conditions of the site and his method of pile installation.
The theoretical safe loading capacity of an individual pile is not to exceed the
following:
(i) For axially loaded piles, the reinforcement shall be 10 m long or otherwise
approved by the SO. .
(ii) For piles subjected to vertical and lateral loads, the reinforcement should
be sufficient to resist all actions including the bending moment. Minimum
cover to reinforcement shall be 75 mm.
5.1 The following aspects of PIP Piles installation shall be documented on each
pile installation record in an approved format:
a) Weather conditions and temperature
b) Date piles placed
c) Pile site supervisory staff’s name
d) Grout truck number, arrival time on-site, batch time and batch volume
e) Grout sampling time and time of initial set
f) Grout cubes made by the Contractor
g) Flow cone test results
h) Auger diameter (note actual diameter each time measured in field)
i) Time period for drilling of pile
j) Rate of penetration of auger (Revolution per Auger Pitch)
k) Abnormal drilling behaviour
l) Pile drilled length/pile tip and top elevation
m) Theoretical pile volume
n) Time period for grouting of pile
o) Range in pressure observed during grouting
p) Grout return depth
q) Grout volume pumped per 1.5 m increment of pile length
r) Total number of pump strokes to complete pile (actual grout volume)
s) Total grout factor
t) Reinforcing steel cage installed in the pile
u) Special remarks (e.g., time of and reason for interruptions during
grouting, extra grout cubes made, etc.).
v) Any other data requested by the SO.
On completion of all piling, submit to the SO two copies of record piling plan
showing, as appropriate, the position, identity number, size and top and bottom
levels of each pile installed.
In addition to those stated in Clause 5.02 of the GS, submit 2 copies of each of the
following with the design submissions:-
a) Details of concrete / grout / mortar mix.
b) Method of installation including equipment to be used, sequence of operations,
drilling methods.
c) Pile head, reinforcement details.
d) Ground settlement monitoring proposal.
e) Any other requirements specified in this particular specification.
No piling works shall commence on site unless the design submissions are approved
by the SO.
OF 10M LENGTH
75
R10 - 225 BINDERS
L = 9 300
1. General
Reinforced Massive Concrete Structures include pile caps, transfer plates and structural
members where the least dimension exceeds 1.5 metres.
This Particular Specification is not applicable to the construction of large diameter bored
piles, barrette piles and diaphragm walls.
2. Method Statement
At least two months before commencement of concreting, the Contractor shall submit a
method statement for temperature control. The information to be submitted shall include,
but not be limited to, the following:
(a) concrete mix details including heat of hydration and specific heat characteristics of
the cementitious constituents, expected concrete temperature rise and the proposed
initial concrete placing temperature;
(e) minimum and maximum times before formwork and insulation are stripped;
(h) based on the TRET results, analyses and calculations to prove that the proposals
will meet the requirements of the Contract.
Trial mixes shall not be prepared until the SO has approved the Contractor’s mix design in
writing. Trial mixes shall be prepared under the supervision of the SO at least 35 days
before the commencement of concreting.
Structural Engineering Branch, ArchSD Page 1 of 4 File code: sei0511 (Rev 2).doc
SE Instruction No. 05/2011 Revision No. 2
Issue Date : March 2020 KLT/LSL/KWL
4. Temperature Rise Evaluation Test
A Temperature Rise Evaluation Test (TRET) shall be made. The test shall consist of an
insulated 800mm×800mm×800mm concrete block constructed to the approval of the SO.
The block shall be instrumented with a minimum of three centrally located thermocouples
connected to an automatic data logger and hourly readings shall be taken until the
temperature has fallen to more than 10oC below the peak temperature. The insulation of
the concrete block shall be complete and equivalent to at least 200mm of expanded
polystyrene with additional protection provided as necessary. The concrete block shall be
constructed and instrumented to the approval of the SO. The information gained during
this test shall be used by the Contractor in the formulation of the temperature control
methods for the mix. The concrete blocks shall be retained for a minimum of 3 months or
as directed by the SO in a manner to ensure that damage or degradation does not occur.
The results of the TRET shall be used in conjunction with the Contractor’s proposed
insulation/cooling methods to evaluate compliance with the temperature control
requirements.
Temperature control for concrete shall comply with the following requirements:
(a) The Contractor shall employ effective means such as shading the aggregates, pre-
cooling mixing water and adding flaked ice to ensure the temperature of concrete
prior to and including the time at which it is placed shall not exceed 25 oC.
(b) After the concrete has been placed, its peak temperature in any part of the structure
shall not be permitted to rise above 85 oC.
(c) After the concrete has been placed, the maximum temperature difference between
any point of a concrete section and the adjacent surface shall not be greater than 20
o
C times the shortest distance, in metres, between the point and the surface.
(d) The Contractor shall employ effective means such as insulation, selection of
appropriate pour cycle times, or heating/cooling as necessary, to ensure that at any
time within 21 days after the concrete has been placed, the temperature differential
between any point in the freshly placed concrete of any structural element at a
distance of 600mm from a construction joint and the corresponding point 600mm
from the construction joint in the adjacent previously placed structural element,
shall not exceed 20 oC.
Structural Engineering Branch, ArchSD Page 2 of 4 File code: sei0511 (Rev 2).doc
SE Instruction No. 05/2011 Revision No. 2
Issue Date : March 2020 KLT/LSL/KWL
6. Concrete Temperature Measurement
(a) The initial placing temperature of the concrete shall be measured by inserting a
calibrated probe-type thermometer, with a r 1 oC accuracy, into each delivery of the
concrete at the time of discharge from the vehicle transporting it or not later than
15 minutes thereafter. The thermometer shall be calibrated weekly.
(b) The Contractor shall continuously compare the real time results of the on-going
temperature monitoring with the predicted values and make appropriate
adjustments to the temperature control methods used on current and subsequent
pours to ensure compliance with this Particular Specification.
(c) The temperature of the hydrating concrete shall be measured for each pour until 21
days after pouring using a sufficient number of calibrated thermocouples to
demonstrate that the requirements of Clause 5 above have been achieved. The
accuracy of thermocouples shall be within a r 2 oC accuracy.
(d) The thermocouples shall be suitably robust to withstand concrete placing, and be
adequately protected and firmly fixed in position on the reinforcement cage. The
thermocouples shall not be placed closer than 300mm to any cooling water pipes to
ensure that they give representative temperature readings.
(e) The output of the thermocouples shall be continuously recorded using an automated
data logger. The power supply to the data logger shall be non-interruptible and the
equipment shall be maintained and checked at least twice per day to ensure that they
are operating satisfactorily.
(f) The thermocouples shall be calibrated in conjunction with the working and backup
data logger(s) and the calibration results shall be submitted at least 7 days prior to
incorporation within the Works.
(g) After installation of the thermocouples within the pour and immediately prior to
concreting, the thermocouples shall be checked by comparing the relative ambient
temperature readings. Any damaged or malfunctioned thermocouple shall be
replaced prior to the commencement of concreting.
(h) After the placing of concrete, the temperature readings shall be taken at a maximum
of hourly intervals for the initial 7 days after placing. The monitoring frequency
can be reduced to 12 r 1 hours thereafter until 21 days after placing or until the
maximum temperature is less than 15 oC above the daily minimum ambient
temperature.
(i) The output from the data loggers shall be down loaded daily by the Contractor. A
copy of the data shall be given to the SO immediately after down loading in an
agreed electronic and hard copy format.
(j) Within 7 days from the completion of the temperature monitoring period the
Contractor shall submit a report. The report shall include the individual tabulated
temperature results and calculated values indicating compliance, as required by this
Particular Specification, for all maximum and differential temperature
Structural Engineering Branch, ArchSD Page 3 of 4 File code: sei0511 (Rev 2).doc
SE Instruction No. 05/2011 Revision No. 2
Issue Date : March 2020 KLT/LSL/KWL
measurements. The report shall be presented in both tabulated and graphical format
and shall include all thermocouples within the same measurement plane on the same
graph to ensure that the temperature differentials between the core, surface and
ambient are readily discernable. Any non-compliance with this Particular
Specification shall be highlighted and proposals given for remedial works and
ensuring compliance in subsequent pours. If the non-compliance is on the
temperature limits as specified in Clause 5 above, the method statement shall be
reviewed and re-submitted to the SO for approval before further concreting of
reinforced massive concrete structure. The Contractor shall submit proposal for
SO’s approval to verify the structural integrity of reinforced concrete structure at
the Contractor’s expense.
If the Contractor proposes to concrete the reinforced massive concrete structure in more
than one operation, he shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the SO that:
(a) at all stages the temperature differential limits specified in Clause 5(c) above will
not be exceeded at any one time;
(c) the stresses in the concrete structure due to temperature changes under strain will
not induce tension cracks;
(d) the construction joint will be treated to ensure monolithic action between the
different pours.
(e) the temperature differentials between two adjacent pours will comply with Clause
5(d) above.
(f) the temperature of concrete prior to and including the time at which it is placed will
comply with Clause 5(a) above.
Structural Engineering Branch, ArchSD Page 4 of 4 File code: sei0511 (Rev 2).doc
SE Instruction No. 05/2011 Revision No. 2
Issue Date : March 2020 KLT/LSL/KWL
Particular Specification for Tension Piles
1.0 General
1.1 The following types of piles shall be permitted to be designed as tension piles:
* delete as appropriate.
1.2 For large diameter bored piles, the requirements stipulated in the Particular
Specification for Large Diameter Bored Piles Socketed into Bedrocks shall be
applicable except those modified by this Particular Specification.
1.3 The allowable anchorage resistance Ra and the ultimate anchorage resistance Ru
of a pile shall be taken as:
The allowable uplift resistance and ultimate uplift resistance of pile may be
derived from Clause 2 and 3 of this Particular Specification.
1.4 The following criteria under transient and permanent tension shall both be
satisfied for the design:
The highest anticipated groundwater table and the highest possible groundwater
table shall be as specified on the drawings.
1.5 Except for large diameter bored piles, tension piles of the same type and size
shall be designed and constructed to the same Ra and Ru under the respective
transient or permanent tension.
1.6 Tension piles under the same building structure shall be of the same type.
Except for large diameter bored piles, tension piles under the same pile cap shall
be of the same size and same Ra and Ru under the respective transient or
permanent tension.
(b) Permanent tension shall mean tension induced to the foundation that is not
categorised as transient tension.
2.1 The allowable uplift resistance of individual pile shall not exceed the least of the
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 2 of 13 File code: SEI0405(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2005 KLT/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: June 2005 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: June 2019
following:
(a) the allowable bond stress between rock and concrete/grout times the area
of contact between the rock and concrete/grout below the effective rock
socket top level; or
(b) the allowable bond stress between the steel H-section and grout times the
total area of contact between the steel H-section and grout below the
effective rock socket top level, for RSSHP; or
(c) the allowable bond stress between the reinforcement and concrete/grout
times the effective area of contact between the reinforcement and
concrete/grout, below the effective rock socket top level, for minipiles and
large diameter bored pile. For minipiles, the effective area of contact shall
be calculated from the effective diameter of a group of bars (with spacing
between adjacent bars less than 25mm) which shall be equivalent to the
diameter of a bar of equal total area; or
(d) the allowable axial force for the steel H-section or steel reinforcements
forming the pile.
The ultimate uplift resistance shall be taken as 2 times the allowable uplift
resistance in this sub-clause and shall not exceed the total effective weight of the
rock cone and the soil column directly above the rock cone derived in accordance
with Clause 2.3 and Figure 1. In case the ultimate uplift resistance is controlled
by the total effective weight of the rock cone and the soil column directly above
the rock cone, the allowable uplift resistance shall be limited by 50% of the total
effective weight of the rock cone and the soil column directly above the rock
cone.
2.2.1. Allowable bond stress between rock and concrete/grout for piles
2.2.2. Allowable bond stress between grout and steel H-pile of RSSHP
The maximum allowable average bond stress between grout and steel H-
pile shall be 0.48 MPa for grout having minimum cube strength of 30MPa
at 28 days when the shear bars detail shown in Annex “E” of GS section
5 is applied. No deduction is required on this maximum allowable average
bond stress when grouting under water.
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 4 of 13 File code: SEI0405(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2005 KLT/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: June 2005 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: June 2019
2.2.3. Allowable bond stress between concrete/grout and reinforcement of
minipiles and large diameter bored pile
2.2.6. The number of steel reinforcing bars for a minipile shall not be more than
5 with bar diameter not exceeding 50mm.
2.3 Assessment of the effective weight of the rock cone and soil column
For single or group of closely-spaced piles (i.e. with overlapping rock cone/soil
column) that derive the ultimate uplift resistance from rock socket, the
configuration of the rock cone/soil column as given in Figure 1 shall be used, and
the assessment of the effective weight of the rock cone and soil column shall be
based on the following assumptions:
(a) The half angle of the rock cone at the toe of the pile shall not exceed 30
degree measuring from the vertical.
(b) Only the column of overburden soil directly above the rock cone shall be
considered, and the soil friction at the vertical face of such soil column above
the rock cone shall be ignored.
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 5 of 13 File code: SEI0405(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2005 KLT/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: June 2005 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: June 2019
(c) Effective weight of the rock cone and the soil column shall be adopted. Any
part of the rock cone or soil column falling outside the site boundary shall
be ignored.
(e) For a group of piles with same allowable uplift resistance of individual piles,
checking of rock/soil cone failure of individual pile is not necessary when
the group effect has been considered as stated in (d) above.
(f) Where the allowable uplift resistance of individual piles within a pile group
are not the same, checking of rock/soil cone failure of individual pile is
required. The effective weight of the overlapping part of rock cones between
piles may be distributed to each pile on a pro-rata basis according to the
allowable uplift resistance of the individual piles.
The allowable/ultimate uplift resistance of individual pile may be derived from and
shall not exceed the least of Clause 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 of this Particular Specification. In
addition, the ultimate uplift resistance of individual piles shall not exceed the value as
derived from Clause 3.4 of this Particular Specification. In case the ultimate uplift
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 7 of 13 File code: SEI0405(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2005 KLT/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: June 2005 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: June 2019
resistance is controlled by the total effective weight of the soil cone/soil column, the
allowable uplift resistance shall be limited by 50% of the total effective weight of the
soil cone/soil column.
3.1 The allowable uplift resistance of individual pile shall not exceed the allowable
axial force for the steel ‘H’ pile section. The maximum allowable working
stress of steel ‘H’ pile section shall be 30% of the yield stress. The ultimate
uplift resistance of pile shall be taken as 2 times the allowable uplift resistance of
pile.
3.2 The allowable and ultimate uplift resistance of individual pile under transient
tension loads
Piles in granular soil may derive the uplift resistance from the frictional
resistance between the surface of the pile and the soil along the pile depth. The
perimeter of the Steel ‘H’ pile for uplift resistance assessment shall be taken as 2
x (breath + depth) of the H section. The allowable and ultimate uplift resistance
of steel ‘H’ piles under transient tension loads may be assessed by one of the
following methods:
A uniform allowable shaft friction of not greater than 10 kPa may be used
for soil strata with SPT N values not less than ten. The ultimate uplift
resistance of pile shall be taken as 2 times the allowable uplift resistance of
pile.
For steel ‘H’ piles in granular soil, β typically ranges from 0.1 to 0.4.
For method (b) or (c) in Clause 3.2, the allowable uplift resistance of the pile
under transient tension loads may be obtained by applying a factor of safety to
the ultimate uplift resistance of the pile under transient tension loads. The applied
factor of safety should be taken not less than 2.
The allowable and ultimate uplift resistance of individual pile under permanent
tension loads shall be taken as:
(b) 50% of the allowable and ultimate uplift resistance calculated in accordance
with method (b) or (c) in Clause 3.2.
For a group of closely-spaced piles (i.e. with overlapping soil cone/soil column)
that derive the ultimate uplift resistance from friction in granular soil, the
configuration of the soil cone/soil column as given in Figure 2 may be used, and
the assessment of the effective weight of the soil cone/soil column should be
based on the following assumptions:
(a) For single pile subjected to tension, checking on soil cone failure is not
required.
(b) For soil with an SPT N-value of not less than 30, the angle of dilation of the
soil cone shall not exceed 1 in 4 (i.e. approximate 15 degree). For soil with
an SPT N-value of less than 30, the angle of dilation of the soil cone shall
be taken as zero.
(c) Skin friction on the face of the soil cone/soil column shall be ignored.
(d) Effective weight of the soil cone/soil column shall be adopted. Any part of
the soil cone/soil column falling outside the site boundary shall be ignored.
(e) For a group of closely-spaced piles with same allowable uplift resistance of
individual piles, overlapping effect of the soil cones shall be considered
when assessing the volume of soil cone/soil column to be used for resisting
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 10 of 13 File code: SEI0405(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2005 KLT/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: June 2005 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: June 2019
the combined uplift force.
(f) Where the allowable uplift resistance of individual piles within a pile group
are not the same, checking of soil cone failure of individual pile is required.
The effective weight of the overlapping part of soil cones and columns
between piles may be distributed to each pile on a pro rata basis according
to the allowable uplift resistance of the individual piles.
The pile head and pile cap connection shall be modified and be designed to transmit
the maximum pile loads on both tension and compression for the approval of the SO.
Static loading tests are required to justify the tension capacity of piles, other than large
Structural Engineering Branch, Arch SD Page 11 of 13 File code: SEI0405(Rev1).doc
SE Instruction No. 04/2005 KLT/MKW/KWL
1st Issue Date: June 2005 Revision No : 1
Revision Date: June 2019
diameter bored piles. Should tension piles be proposed, the contractor shall bear the
cost and time of the required tests.
The SO may order not less than 1% of nos. of piles installed of each Ra (minimum one
number or more piles for each Ra), other than large diameter bored piles, to be load
tested to twice the Ra. The maximum test load should not result in the test pile being
stressed beyond the yield stress, and in no case shall the test load exceed Ru.
The pile should be load tested at the cut-off level with no allowance for group effect.
Loading tests of piles shall be carried out by a Testing Firm employed direct by the
Employer. The Contractor shall co-ordinate the works with the Testing Firm and
comply with the requirements as stated in Clause 5.29 of the GS.
Should reaction pad be proposed for tension loading tests, the reaction pads should be
of sufficient plan dimensions to transfer the reaction loads to the ground without
settling at a rate that would cause difficulty in maintaining the applied test loads and
the ground should be adequately strong. The Contractor shall provide and erect the
reaction pads with adequate stability and safety as approved by SO. The reaction pads
should be located as far from the test pile as possible, and the Contractor shall submit
proposal for SO’s approval to assess the interaction effects.
Should the Contractor design the pile by adopting a Ra less than the maximum value
allowed in this particular specification, the reduced Ra shall be used for the purpose
of tension loading test.
(a) the maximum extension at the head of the pile during the test exceeds the elastic
extension (PL/AE) of the net length of the pile plus 4 mm;
(b) when the rate of recovery after the removal of the maximum test load is less than
0.1 mm/hour observed in a period of not less than 15 minutes, the residual
extension at the head of the pile exceeds the greater of 4 mm and 25% of the
maximum pile head extension during the test; or
In calculating the elastic axial extension of minipile or RSSHP, the following criteria
shall be adopted: