05 Introduction Chapter 1
05 Introduction Chapter 1
05 Introduction Chapter 1
net/publication/260990295
05 Introduction chapter 1
CITATIONS READS
0 165
1 author:
Richard Holdich
Loughborough University
221 PUBLICATIONS 1,874 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Richard Holdich on 23 March 2014.
1.3 Sampling
Processing is usually performed on small particles contained in bags,
drums, 1 tonne Intermediate Bulk Containers (IBC) or trucks.
Fig. 1.1 A grab sample Analysis for particle size, and other characteristics, usually requires
only a few grams. The most convenient method of obtaining a sample
of a few grams is to take a grab sample from the bulk, often scooping
the few grams off the top of the pile, or sack, see Figure 1.1. However,
segregation during particle motion is very common; examples include
the tendency for larger particles to rise to the top in breakfast cereals
such as muesli – and finer particles to fall between the gaps to the
bottom of the packet. Hence, a simple grab sample is rarely adequate
for a reliable analysis. The absence of a truly representative sample
invalidates any further work on the particles, be it laboratory tests for
some process (i.e. unit operation) or for particle size analysis and
characterisation.
When sampling from a suspension the viscous nature of the fluid
may assist in representative sampling; e.g. particles settle slower so
that stirring is often effective in suspending the particles for an
adequate time to obtain a good sample. However, at low
Fig. 1.2 A chute riffler concentrations the hindering (Chapter 6) effect of other particles is
not strong and vigorous stirring can lead to centrifugal separation
Fundamentals of Particle Technology 3
(Chapter 8). In air, or any gaseous medium, motion can help the
segregation of particles by differences in size, density, moment of
rotational inertia, coefficient of restitution, etc. Hence, sampling of
free flowing particles should be performed according to accepted
standards (BS 3406) and using well-known techniques such as:
sample cutters, cone and quartering (25 kg solids and above), chute
riffles (50 kg solids down to 25 g), see Figure 1.2, spinning riffler (1
kg down to 25 g), see Figure 1.3. Ultimately, a scoop, or grab, sample
from the suitably reduced mass of powder will be required for use in
an instrument if, as is usual, 25 g is still too much powder to be used.
When sampling a dilute stream of powder entrained in a gas stream,
isokinetic sampling is often recommended; i.e. equal fluid velocities in
the bulk flow and within the sample probe. Isokinetic sampling is
discussed in greater detail below. Fig. 1.3 Spinning riffler with
A sample cutter is used to take a sample from a flowing stream of vibratory feeder from hopper
powder, such as on a conveyer belt. At a transfer station, from one belt
to another, the powder will be dropped from the first belt on to the
second, and the sample cutter will intermittently move into the
falling powder to remove a sample. It is important that the cutter
removes a sample across the entire width of the falling powder, or
width of the belt, because segregation during transit may result in
particles of a certain size preferentially positioned on the belt.
Cone and quartering is a technique used extensively within the
minerals industries for coarse sized material up to several centimetres
in diameter, to obtain a more tractable sample size, and is often
applied before riffling. The entire contents of the container, or bag, to
be sampled are discharged on to a clean flat surface, which could be a
swept floor. The material is then made into a cone by shovelling
material from the sides to the centre to form a cone. The cone is
usually then flattened to minimise the likelihood of pushing material
at the top in any one direction. It is common for the larger particles to
roll to the periphery of the cone and the finer ones to stay near the
centre. However, so long as the cone is made evenly there should be
an equal distribution of larger particles all around the periphery of
the cone, with no bias towards any position. Thus, quartering the
heap by dividing it into four roughly equal portions should provide
samples representative of the original material. It is usual to then take
two quarters at opposite sides of the heap and remove them from the
sample. The remaining two form the sample and the process can be
repeated to reduce further the overall sample size. A similar
technique can be applied to smaller amounts of finer particles, subject
to adequate safety – health and environment considerations, coned
and quartered on a bench, but the process is operator dependent and
it is unlikely that a sample would be as representative as one
provided by the other techniques described above.
When sampling airborne particles from flow within ducts it is
important that the flow entering the sample filter is the same as that Fig. 1.4 Isokinetic sampling
in the duct, or pipe, see Figure 1.4. This is to prevent particles from a duct or pipe
4 Introduction