Trs601.part 2-76-103
Trs601.part 2-76-103
Trs601.part 2-76-103
HUMANITIES
Synthesis of Information
UNIT PROFILE OUTCOMES
In this unit, you will consider the subject of humanities— • Synthesize information from several sources
specifically the perspectives of ancient cultures on life and death. • Understand multiple perspectives
You will learn about the poetry of Homer, Virgil, and Dante, and
• Evaluate the credibility and motives of
the underworld, including the journey to and from as depicted
sources
above.
• Understand and use direct and indirect
Preview the reading “The Hero’s Journey” on page 231.
quotations
Skim the reading. How many sources are there? How are their
perspectives different on a given topic? Does any source seem • Appreciate hedging
to be more credible than another?
GETTING STARTED
Go to to listen to Professor Harrison and to complete a self-assessment.
Discuss these questions with a partner or group.
1. English has the phrase “magical thinking.” It means believing that one thing results from another
thing even though there is no evidence or solid reasoning to support a link between the two.
Superstition is an example of magical thinking. So is the ancient Greek and Roman tradition of
believing that immortals—from Aphrodite to Zeus—were constantly interfering in human affairs.
Do you or anyone you know engage in magical thinking? What do you believe?
2. Countless stories, from ancient to modern times, feature the idea of communication between the
living and the dead—including Odysseus's visit to the underworld and Hamlet's encounters with the
ghost of his father. What examples can you think of? What is the basis for our fascination with these
exchanges?
WHY IT’S USEFUL By learning to synthesize information from several sources, you will be able to build
well-rounded conceptions of a topic. You will also be able to place the information from any given source
into an overall schema of the facts and opinions about a topic.
B. Read the statements about the passage. Then mark each statement as T (True) or F (False).
F 1. King, White, and Hall each state that Greeks, Romans, and medieval Europeans shared the
belief that all humans reached the underworld after death.
F 2. King, White, and Hall each point out that heroes are exceptions among Greeks in terms of
destiny and the underworld.
T 3. Of the three experts, White gives the most thorough description of the position of
purgatory.
F
4. Of the work done by the three authors, White’s research addresses the most modern notions
of the afterlife.
T 5. King, White, and Hall agree that in the Aeneid and The Divine Comedy, logical methods are
used to group people in the underworld.
T 6. White and King do not indicate, as Hall does, that Dante’s and Virgil’s motives for subjecting
souls to torture in various levels of the underworld were political and religious.
Go to to complete a vocabulary exercise and skill practice, and to join in collaborative activities.
WHY IT’S USEFUL By understanding information from various sources about a given topic, you can
build a comprehensive, wide-ranging command of the concept. Recognizing how various sources agree
with, disagree with, add to, and update one another gives you a well-rounded feel for the range of opinion
among experts.
In academic readings, you will come across texts that are about the same topic, idea, or fact but are
presented or understood by their authors in very different ways. You will also be exposed to texts
on a given topic that offer information other texts on the same topic do not. This is even common
in research—while one researcher may interpret evidence to mean one thing, another might draw a
different conclusion.
In order to understand multiple perspectives, it is first necessary that you ensure that the sources are
discussing the same general idea. For example, the information in a text by Author A about Aristotle’s
idea of the “golden mean” cannot be synthesized with information in a text by Author B about Aristotle’s
concept of “syllogism.” While they are both ideas propounded by the same philosopher, they do not share
the same main idea.
After determining that the texts you are reading are on the same topic, your next task is to recognize the
perspectives that are presented by each author. In order to do this, it is helpful to become familiar with
language that is used to express a perspective.
It is generally accepted that … It is generally accepted that historical writings provide clues
about a given society.
According to [X person / According to Randall , the textiles were meant to honor the
people] … Greek god.
Many / Some / [other noun] Researchers believe that the artifacts are historically significant.
believe (that) …
[X event / fact / evidence] Research on ancient Greek artifacts indicates that jewelry was
indicate that … worn by individuals of high social status.
[X event / fact / evidence] will The finding will likely shed light on recent archaeological
likely … discoveries in the same area.
[X event / fact / evidence] are The sculpture is unlikely to have been the work of an ancient
likely / unlikely to … artist.
It is likely that … It is likely that the artifacts mentioned in the passage were
figments of the author's imagination.
[X person / people] maintain Drake maintains that historical figures in the poems are entirely
that … fictional.
Continued
[X event / fact / evidence] The works of art reveal that ancient sculptors used quite
reveal … advanced methods.
[X person / people] emphasize / Highland stresses that the Trojan War is an event that must not
stress (that) … be le out of the narrative.
X suggests (that) … The discovery suggests that ancient Greeks highly valued works
of art.
It is thought that … It is thought that Homer spoke, not wrote, his legendary stories.
X must / can be viewed … The art can be viewed as authentic if the research is reliable.
Read the following paragraph. Notice how the language from the chart is woven throughout the
paragraph to express the perspectives of the two (fictional) researchers.
Recognizing varying viewpoints is not always as easy as picking out phrases like those above, however.
These viewpoints often take the form of longer, complex explanations, so it is up to the reader to first
determine whether the information presented by the sources really confl icts—that is, whether the two
sets of information are mutually exclusive and cannot both be true—or if the authors present slightly
different viewpoints on the same topic, perspectives that are different but may both be true, at least
to some degree. If it is the former (conflicting information), you must ask yourself how these sources
disagree with one other. This could be disagreement about facts, the significance of facts, an idea, or
an interpretation of an idea. If it is the latter (different viewpoints), it is important to think about how
different the perspectives are from one another. Consider the angle from which that information is viewed
by each source to determine whether Source A may take one concept into consideration while Source B
focuses on another.
Continued
WHY IT’S USEFUL In a reading that presents multiple perspectives, some sources are more believable
or persuasive than others. By recognizing and evaluating sources’ qualifications, present standing in
their fields, and possible motivations for their stances, you can better judge whose perspectives are more
convincing.
Most of the academic texts you read have been reviewed by experts and editors—at book publishing
companies or journals—before you see them. Even online material, if you fi nd it on a reputable site,
may have gone through strenuous checks for factuality and credibility. You are unlikely to read very
many academic pieces that present totally ridiculous ideas from sources who have no credibility at
all. However, that does not mean that every claim in every article or chapter is equally believable and
convincing. Editors may be screening material before you read it, but they do not necessarily remove
every doubtful claim, every self-serving remark, or every controversial point of view. In fact, some
authors and their editors think they have an obligation to present views that are not in the mainstream,
simply to get their readers to consider issues from a number of viewpoints.
Applying your critical thinking skills is vital when you read material that argues an issue several ways.
A source’s expertise is the first thing most readers consider. Which of the following sources do you find
most credible regarding the portrayal of gold objects in Homer’s Odyssey?
A. Joseph Novak, professor of mathematics at Harvard University, argues that Homer could
not have described golden treasure troves so well unless he had been an occasional guest
of Greece’s wealthiest families.
B. “Homer’s detailed eye for the intricacies of golden plate work,” says Dionis Katzanopoulos,
“reflects the sensibilities of a visual artist, not just a writer.”
C. According to Lara Worth, professor of Greek and Roman history at Baldwin State
University, most of the details regarding golden objects were added by “later transcribers
of Homer’s works,” not originated by the bard himself.
Most readers would say that the source cited in Example C probably has the greatest expertise.
Greek history is her field. Even though the university she represents is not as illustrious as Harvard
(Example A), the Harvard source is a mathematician. He is probably very smart, but from the little bit
we know, his profession may not grant him expertise on this subject. The source quoted in Example B
is hard to evaluate. He has a Greek-sounding name, but that does not mean he knows very much about
ancient Greek golden objects. We simply cannot tell whether he has expertise.
Expertise may derive from several factors:
• a source’s present job
• the quality of the organization (university, company, government office, etc.) that employs the
source
• a source’s past or present research
• the books, articles, movies, and other materials produced by the source
• a source’s relationship—via family, friendship, acquaintance—with the person or subject matter
under discussion
• a source’s firsthand observation of an incident or situation
PART 2
CULTURE NOTE
credibility and effectiveness. Might the source make Sometimes, a person of great achievement who is
unreliable claims because of any of the following? considered a highly credible source in one arena
becomes a promoter of strange ideas in another. His
• a desire to make money or her credibility, therefore, becomes, or at least risks
becoming, diminished. For example, the American
• a desire for attention or fame chemist Linus Pauling (1901–1994) won two Nobel
• political or religious beliefs Prizes, one in chemistry and the other the Nobel
Peace Prize. His early work on molecular structures
• a personal relationship (good or bad) with was groundbreaking, but late in life he developed a
someone involved in the subject at hand belief in the healing power of certain vitamins that
was not backed up by generally accepted medical
• a deterioration in the source’s dependability research. This seemingly irrational attachment
(owing to recent mental or emotional to unsupported medical / dietary ideas tainted
Pauling’s reputation. For another example, Henry
difficulty, etc.) Ford, the founder of the Ford Motor Company and
a revolutionary genius in manufacturing, would
It may not be easy to know whether one of these factors, certainly have been considered a highly credible
such as the desire to promote a religious or political source regarding production efficiencies. However,
he used his wealth and prominence to promote a
belief, is operating in the source’s case, but you may be range of weird, idiosyncratic ideas about everything
able to guess by doing an informal online search of the from personal diet, to religion, to the supposed
danger of putting up tall buildings. (He thought they
source. If the source writes for general audiences (not would make the Earth’s surface collapse.) Ultimately,
just technical specialists), you might also be able to find an author must be very discerning when choosing
sources and quotes as evidence for an idea, weighing
relevant reviews in newspapers, magazines, blog posts, the benefits of expertise against the potential costs
and so on. of damaged integrity.
EXERCISE 2
A. Read the passage.
Continued
B. Read each question and write a short answer about sources and their credibility.
1. The author mentions two aspects of Elaine Moore’s background that indicate expertise. What
are they?
2. Why would Hector LeBaise probably not be considered a respected source of archaeology?
PART 2
CULTURE NOTE
Greek life? Many English words derive
He’s a linguist who can read ancient Greek from the religious beliefs of
ancient cultures, including
those of the Greeks, Romans,
4. In what way is Garcia less competent than Elaine Moore in speaking and Norse (the inhabitants
about ancient Greek life? of present-day Scandinavia).
For example, the names of
He is not a fi eld archaeologist Roman gods give us January,
March, May, and June. Norse
mythology gives us the
words Tuesday, Wednesday,
Thursday, and Friday. Other
5. What is the author’s attitude toward the expertise of Sir Beowulf Tate? English words derived from
Greek, Latin, and Norse
He is not an expert, just an unqualifi ed person with an interest in Greek history include bible, chaos, die,
hell, mortality, mercurial,
postmortem, and theology.
7. When the author mentions Tate in the last paragraph, he uses two adjectives to indicate that Tate
is not a great expert. What is one of them?
8. What does the author say in the last paragraph, however, that indicates Tate was not always
wrong?
Go to to complete a vocabulary exercise and skill practice, and to join in collaborative activities.
WHY IT’S USEFUL By recognizing and evaluating how an author quotes other sources, both directly and
indirectly, you can add depth to your understanding of a reading. You not only appreciate the author’s
efforts to support his or her claims, but you also see how the author is trying to position his or her text
within a larger sphere of discourse. By understanding the way an author frames a quote, you can also
appreciate nuances of the author’s own stance and point of view.
The English physicist and mathematician Sir Isaac Newton once wrote, “If I have seen further, it is
because I have stood on the shoulders of giants.” This is a remarkable thing for him to say because very
few humans have shaped our knowledge of the physical universe as fundamentally as Newton. Yet, the
statement expresses his debt to the countless generations of explorers and thinkers who went before
him and whose accumulated wisdom made his own discoveries possible. This attitude also explains
something basic about academic writing and the authors who engage in it: Great value is placed on
knowing what other thinkers have said or written, and your own work gains credibility if you can
support it with quotations from other writers or researchers.
Notice that, even in describing the importance of quotations, we used a quotation. It is a direct
quotation because it reproduces Newton’s exact words, as indicated by the set of quotation marks
around part of the statement.
We also could have expressed it as an indirect quotation, a statement based on his words but not
reproducing them exactly (a kind of paraphrase):
Sir Isaac Newton once commented that, if he could see things that most people couldn’t, it was
because he was able to make use of the contributions of other great thinkers before him.
Another possibility is a hybrid statement, which is partly a direct quote and partly indirect:
Sir Isaac Newton once commented that if he “saw further” than most people, it was because
he “stood on the shoulders of giants.”
Direct, indirect, and hybrid quotes are all effective, and all have their place in academic pieces. Here are
some factors to note:
• Direct quotations are often preferred if the wording from a CULTURE NOTE
source is particularly clever or picturesque. This could be said of As prime minister of the UK,
Newton’s quote. The value of the statement is not just in what he Winston Churchill (1874–1965)
delivered what is perhaps one
said but in the way he said it. of the greatest expressions of
• This “clever or picturesque” point includes wording that creates defiance under pressure. Speaking
to the House of Commons in June
an allusion or a metaphor. Consider the passage by Winston 1940, a time when World War II
Churchill in the CULTURE NOTE. Not only does Churchill’s seemed to be going entirely the
Nazis’ way, he said, “We shall fight
clever phrasing, with its persistent rhythm, justify a direct on the beaches, we shall fight on
quote, but his mention of the “beaches” and “landing grounds” the landing grounds, we shall fight
in the fields and in the streets,
(an allusion to recent Nazi victories in France) and his choice of we shall fight in the hills; we shall
words—all of Old English descent except for “surrender”— also never surrender.”
strike a defiantly British tone that no paraphrase could equal.
• An indirect quotation may be preferred if the original is too long or not efficiently stated.
• A hybrid quotation may be preferred if part of the original is notably well stated, but the whole
quotation is either too long or not consistently well worded.
• Often quotations are extended—that is, referred to off and on throughout an entire paragraph or
even a set of paragraphs.
• Sometimes, a direct quotation is inset—printed with narrower margins than the text around
it—not printed within an ordinary text paragraph. If the quotation is inset, there are no quotation
marks around it. Typically authors inset a quotation if it is four lines long or longer.
underworld that awaited people after their death. 2However, as Professor Bjarni Gorlund puts it,
“Our knowledge of the Norse afterlife is a mere inch of thread compared to the elaborate Greek
and Roman shrouds we know.” 3These elaborate, well-documented, hero-populated underworlds
of the Mediterranean peoples—Gerda Rollins went so far as to call their highly organized strata
“rational”—are so fully realized that subsequent writers, viz. Dante Alighieri, could have characters
give tours of them. 4Karl Ramstad characterized the Norse underworld as a “dark basement,” which
we navigate “without much light from early commentators and certainly no floor plan.”
2 5Alva Ros Gunnarsdottir, of Iceland’s Poetic Trust, notes that the few sources we do have that
describe the underworld in Norse mythology—primarily the Poetic Edda, the Prose Edda, and
the Eglis Saga of Iceland—are of relatively late provenance. 6Gunnarsdottir doesn’t take at face
value the claims these sources make—including the unknown author of the Eglis Saga—about
being based on earlier works, and indeed she notes that they date from the post-mythological age.
7Snorri Sturluson is the primary authorial suspect in the literary “whodunnit” surrounding those
specifically named works, at least Gunnarsdottir believes so—and Sturluson was writing in the
13th century, after the Norse had been Christianized.
3 8Perhaps because a long-prevailing metaphor in English situates the punitive afterlife in hell,
which is reflexively understood as being “down,” we have given too little attention to directionality
in both the Mediterranean and Norse mythic cosmologies. 9As Gorlund puts it:
10The dead are buried. 11Downward, below the surface that the living inhabit, is
perhaps the most intuitive location for a land of the dead. 12Since we can only access
the depths of the Earth through fearsome places like caves or craters, the entrance to a
subterranean underworld—if one ever saw it—would probably be a frightening place,
and construing it as guarded by a wizened gatekeeper or a vicious beast seems almost
rational, at least according to the spirit-besotted worlds in which ancients lived.
4 13 Gunnarsdottir has attempted to draw a trail map of the three possible destinations for the soul.
The English word hell derives from the name of one Norse destination of the dead—Helheim, ruled
by the goddess Hel. 14Gunnarsdottir cautions that Norse sources are unclear and contradictory, but
Helheim was not a place of suffering. 15“It wasn’t an especially distinguished place,” she says. “It
was really a bland default position.” 16Valhalla, perhaps the best known postmortem destination
in Norse mythology, was supposedly a gathering place of heroes, chosen by supernatural beings
called the Valkyries—although many heroes apparently were not chosen and wound up elsewhere.
17 Finally, Gunnarsdottir mentions Folkvangr (“Field of the People”), ruled by the goddess Freyja.
18This was another pleasant but unexciting destination—at least as far as one can gather from what
Aside from excerpts from Dante’s The Divine Comedy and Newman’s Apologia, the sources and source quotations in this pas-
sage are fictional.
D. Based on sources and information in “Virgil as the Guide of Dante,” create direct, indirect, and
hybrid quotes. Follow the prompts. (For ideas, see the TIP: Usage Notes, above.)
1. Neutral, hybrid quote: Marguerite Spellman calls Rome “the central actor of an entire millennium”
and says that the city defined life even for peoples who had never heard of it.
Go to to complete a vocabulary exercise and skill practice, and to join in collaborative activities.
WHY IT’S USEFUL Recognizing hedging language will enable you to understand when a writer is
attempting to sound reasonable, strike a moderate tone, or avoid unsupportable extremes, all through
the use of cautious language.
Continued
Language that writers typically avoid when they are attempting to be cautious in their communication
of information includes the following: undoubtedly, without a doubt, there is no doubt that, clearly, obviously,
definitely, certainly, absolutely, always, never, all, every. This is due to the fact that this language expresses
complete certainly, thus leaving no room for error or alternative viewpoints.
EXERCISE 4
A. The following are excerpts from readings in this unit. What hedging language do you see? Identify
the words and phrases that hedge and underline them.
1. Virgil’s hero Aeneas, like Homer’s Odysseus, descends into the underworld to interact with the deceased,
but Virgil’s portrayal is that the honor due to Aeneas vastly outweighs whatever the reader may owe
Odysseus.
2. Different scholars have speculated on various intentions Homer may have had for writing the passage,
from simply recording what life looked like during his time to using the beauty of the passage to deepen
the scope of the great tragedy about to occur in the poem.
3. Further, many fine art examples described in the text, such as the famous shield of Achilles, likely
did not exist.
4. Tate stumbled across various animal bones interred alongside human remains in graves in both Cyprus
and Attica—graves that predate the Trojan War across the seas—which has led scholars such as George
Kristidis of the Athenian Academy to reluctantly acknowledge a possible connection between the
cremation passages in the Iliad and burial customs in ancient Greece.
5. The Greeks, especially by the mid-8th century bce, believed that the soul of one unburied would continue
to trouble the living, according to Moore.
PART 2
according to a person’s behavior in life.
7. Homer’s epic poems the Iliad and the Odyssey give vivid descriptions of textiles, decorative battle gear,
and architectural elements that should be considered in art history as an authentic depiction of art
objects of great importance.
8. Odysseus heroically longs for his land and his love, and the reader can more easily empathize with him
than with the somewhat pompous Roman poetic hero.
B. The information in the following sentences is stated in an overly confident manner. Identify the
excessively confident language and then replace it with hedging language. It may be necessary to
change word order or grammar. The sentences you write should express the same information as
the original sentences but with lesser degrees of certainty.
1. Ancient Greek artifacts depicted in the Odyssey and the Aeneid were certainly real artistic pieces
that existed at the time the epics were written.
3. It is obvious that Dante wrote in Italian—the common language of the people—rather than in
Latin so that his work could be understood by everyone.
4. Dante clearly chose Virgil to be his guide because of Virgil's reputation as a pagan in the eyes of the
medieval church.
5. Every scholar disagrees about the authenticity of the art pieces described by Homer and Virgil.
B. Reread the questions in Before You Read, Part B. Is there anything you cannot answer? What reading
skills can you use to help you find the answers?
THINKING VISUALLY
You have learned that the collective unconscious is a shared structure of archetypes found in the
human unconscious mind and is part of the foundation of the hero’s journey.
1. Study the chart, which features archetypes suggested by June Singer, a psychologist and analyst of
Carl Jung’s work. Do some quick Internet searches to find out the meanings of unfamiliar words or
concepts in the chart. You will note that each row presents a pair of opposites (e.g., the Great Mother
is the opposite of the Terrible Mother.)
2. Now think of literary and film characters you know well. Which archetypes from the chart do you
think these characters represent? Think of specific examples of scenes in which these archetypes
manifest themselves. Add their names to the chart. How do these archetypes contribute to the “hero’s
journey” of this character? Share your chart with another student.
Ego Shadow
Time Eternity
Light Darkness
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
2. Researchers refer to the concept as a “monomyth” and argue that this archetypal story arises from the
inherent human need for understanding and growth through quests for knowledge.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
3. At this point in the narrative, the hero generally meets trials, tests of endurance, and enemies.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
4. Gareth Fields, professor of cognitive psychology and author of The Hero’s Journey in the Modern Mind,
postulates that the hero’s journey emerges from the human desire to use an external struggle—a story—to
mirror psychological difficulties that people must overcome.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
5. The collective unconscious is, according to Burns, a shared structure of archetypes found in the human
unconscious mind.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
PART 2
tropes to provoke feelings of triumph, despair, and glory that bring about an individual’s awareness of the
self, which Burns refers to as knowledge acquisition.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
7. While the Odyssey may not fall into the category of “pleasure reading” for the average student of the mid-
2010s, as Boudicca Inez so poignantly expresses in her recent article in Bolster Magazine, other tales of heroes
who follow the same hero’s journey archetype do not necessarily suffer the same fate.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):
8. Even nonreaders cannot avoid the hero’s journey, Inez claims, and that is in no small part due to
Star Wars.
Words / Phrases:
Rewritten sentence(s):