1 s2.0 S1743919122006148 Main
1 s2.0 S1743919122006148 Main
1 s2.0 S1743919122006148 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Background: Inguinal hernia (IH) repair is a common surgical procedure. Focus has shifted from recurrences to
Inguinal hernia chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP). To assess the natural course of CPIP and identify patient factors
Herniorrhaphy influencing the onset of CPIP, an observational registry-based study was performed.
CPIP
Materials and methods: Data prospectively collected from the Club-Hernie national database was retrieved from
Surgical technique
Quality of life
2011 until 2021. Patients who underwent elective surgery for inguinal hernia were divided in an irrelevant pain
Registry group and relevant pain group. Relevant pain at one year and two years were compared with patients with
irrelevant pain at all-time points (preoperatively, one month, one year and two years). Quality of life questions
were compared between relevant pain at one year and two years.
Results: 4.016 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 65.1 years, 90.3% of patients was male.
Factors correlated with CPIP onset were age, gender, ASA, recurrent surgery, surgical technique, nerve handling
and fixation type. Relevant pain at one month was a greater risk for CPIP than preoperative pain (12.3% vs
3.6%). In the majority of patients (83.2%) CPIP was ameliorated at two years. Hernia related complaints differed
significantly between CPIP at one year and two years.
Conclusion: Postoperative pain after one month was a greater risk factor for CPIP development than preoperative
pain. CPIP at one year seems to have a different pain etiology than CPIP at two years. Patient and surgical factors
influence the onset of CPIP at one year, however the natural course of these complaints shows great decline at
two years, largely without reinterventions.
* Corresponding author. Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Room Ee-173, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands,
PO BOX 2040, 3000, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E-mail address: [email protected] (L.M. van den Dop).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106837
Received 21 February 2022; Received in revised form 28 July 2022; Accepted 11 August 2022
Available online 18 August 2022
1743-9191/© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
self-adhesive). While glue in the form of fibrin or cyanoacrylate has been thoroughly. There is some information that CPIP dissipates over time,
proven to reduce short-term postoperative pain, doubt still exists but no information is given about the patient and surgical factors that
whether this will be significant for the onset of inguinal pain in the long may come into play [14]. Surgeons can inform patients about the
run [9,10]. chances of developing CPIP, which is about ten percent depending on
While many studies focus on the factors that influence the onset of open or endoscopic techniques, but information about the long-term
CPIP [4,11–13], the natural course of CPIP has not been investigated course of CPIP and chances of CPIP persisting for over one year with
Fig. 1. Flowchart representing the patient inclusion and time-dependent conditional probability of relevant pain one month postoperatively, one year post
operatively and two years postoperatively.
2
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
respect to their patient and surgical characteristics is lacking. This would handling (i.e. not seen, preservation or resection) of the iliohypogastric
be valuable information for patients experiencing CPIP. nerve (IHN) and the ilioinguinal nerve (IIN).
In order to provide an outlook on the course of CPIP and quantitate To measure preoperative and postoperative pain the Verbal Rating
quality of life deterioration, the aim of this study is to assess the con Scale (VRS) was used. This scale is divided in four scores (i.e. no pain,
ditional probability of continuous pain and discomfort, depending on mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain). For present comparison, these
the earlier status of pain and discomfort, and identifying patient and/or groups are clustered in irrelevant pain (no pain, mild pain) and relevant
surgical factors contributing to pain and/or discomfort with a complete pain (moderate and severe pain).
follow-up of two years. Patients who reported relevant pain at one year and two years were
compared to patients that reported no pain at one month, one year and
2. Methods two years with respect to baseline, hernia and surgical characteristics.
Quality of Life was assessed with the use of a validated telephone
This prospectively collected observational study was registered at questionnaire in the form of a PROM concept. Patients were asked a self-
researchregistry.com (UIN: researchregistry7671) and conducted ac assessment of their complaints in a simple manner and understandable
cording to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational for everyone with capacity of the French language. QoL was compared
studies in Epidemiology) and STROCSS (Strengthening the Reporting of to the patient group that reported relevant pain at one year and two year
Cohort Studies in Surgery) statements [15]. to distinguish possible differences in experienced afflictions.
Data utilized in this study was prospectively collected by the mem
bers of the Hernia-Club Registry [16] and retrospectively reviewed. This
2.4. Statistical analysis
registry functions as a prospectively compiled online database of sur
gical procedures for all ventral abdominal wall hernias. The Hernia-Club
Baseline characteristics are presented as means with standard devi
(club-hernie-mesh.com) is a society of French surgeons with an interest
ation, medians with inter-quartile range or as numbers of patients and
in parietal surgery, and who have been gathering the prospective ano
percentages, as appropriate. Patients who had no pain at any measured
nymised data for all ventral abdominal wall hernia patients since 2011.
time point (one month, one year and two years postoperatively) were
compared to patients with relevant pain at one year and to patients with
2.1. Data collection
relevant pain at and two years postoperatively, using multivariable bi
nary logistic regression, including the variables age, gender, ASA clas
Surgeons from all over France enlisted patients consecutively and
sification, smoking status, activity level, diabetes, primary/recurrent
unselectively in close-ended boxes. Patients gave their formal consent
hernia, EHS hernia classification, and mesh fixation, presenting odds
for auditing of the original medical records in the case of discrepancies
ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Surgical approach
between the database and patient reported outcomes during the follow-
and nerve handling were excluded from multivariable analysis, as these
up visit, independent of the attending surgeon.
variables correlate heavily to the mesh fixation that was used. This
Data collection for follow-up was performed by a clinical research
correlation was discovered by Cross-Tabulation. Univariable binary lo
assistant (CRA) by telephone calls. This included validated Quality of
gistic regression was used for surgical approach, iliohypogastric nerve
Life (QoL) questionnaires in the form of Patient Reported Outcome
handling and ilioinguinal nerve handling. For iliohypogastric nerve
Measurements (PROMs).
handling, only patients undergoing the Lichtenstein procedure were
Patients were informed that their data was registered in a pseudo
considered. For ilioinguinal nerve handling only patients undergoing the
nymized manner, and only the CRA and operating surgeon were able to
Lichtenstein and TIPP procedures were considered. Model fitting was
relate the pseudonymized number with the patient. Data was stored in a
assessed with the Log-Likelihood statistic. QoL outcomes were compared
protected databank in Switzerland. This registry is abiding to the re
using Pearson’s Chi-Square test. Correction for multiple testing was not
quirements of the French ‘Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et
performed.
des Libertés’ (CNIL; registration number 1993959v0).
Additional information regarding registration in the Hernia-Club
3. Results
database can be found in the articles by Romain et al. and De Smet
et al. [13,17].
In total, 4.016 repairs were extracted from the Club-Hernie database
that completed the full two-year follow-up between 2011 and 2021, and
2.2. Patients and methods
were included in the analysis.
All patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair from 2011 to
2021 were identified from the Hernia-Club registry. Only patients with 3.1. Patient, hernia and surgical characteristics
minimum two years of follow-up were included in the study (Fig. 1).
Baseline characteristics of the included patients is shown in Table 1.
2.3. Outcomes Mean age of patients was 65.1 years and patients were predominantly
male (90.3%). Generally, patients had good physical health with only
Data derived from the registry included patient demographics such 7.7% of patients having a BMI higher than 30, only 9.9% of patients had
as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American association of Anes an ASA classification exceeding two, 52.8% was active (i.e. doing ex
thesiologists (ASA) classification, smoking, comorbidities such as dia ercise), and 4.1% of patients had diabetes.
betes, preoperative pain and physical activity. Primary hernias were the main type of hernia (92.8%), with lateral
Hernia characteristics identified were whether the hernia was pri and medial inguinal types representing the majority of hernia types.
mary or recurrent and classified according to the EHS classification of The surgical techniques were clustered into two groups: open and
inguinal hernias [18]. laparoendoscopic techniques.
Surgical characteristics included surgical techniques: Lichtenstein, Most procedures encompassed an open technique (55.2%). Meshes
transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair, transinguinal preper or other prosthetics were used in 96.7% repairs, and most prosthetics if
itoneal (TIPP) repair, totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, use of pros fixated, were fixated by resorbable staples (46.0%). Almost all surgeries
thetics, fixation of these prosthetics (e.g. resorbable and non-resorbable were performed under general anaesthesia, and many surgeons did not
sutures, resorbable and non-resorbable staples, glue, self-adhesive), type undertake nerve identification, 54.0% of the IHNs and 38.8% of the IINs
of anaesthesia (i.e. general, spinal or local) and intra-operative nerve the course was not recognized during open surgery.
3
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
4
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
Table 2
Patients with no pain at 1 month, 1 year and 2 years versus patients with relevant pain at 1 year. Missing values were omitted from analyses.1: only Lichtenstein repairs
considered in analysis.2: only Lichtenstein and TIPP repairs considered in analysis. *: too few (<10) patients in group in order to interpret logistic regression. **: Chi-
squared test. OR: odds ratio. UV: univariable logistic regression, MV: multivariable logistic regression.
No pain N = 2796 (%) Relevant pain N = 167 (%) OR (UV, 95% CI) OR (MV, 95% CI) P-value
Patient characteristics
Age
<60 years 842 (30.1) 56 (33.5) 1.763 (1.150–2.703) 0.009
>60 years 1952 (69.8) 111 (66.5) (ref)
Male sex 2552 (91.3) 142 (85.0) 0.466 (0.258–0.840) 0.011
BMI at year 1 24.7 (5.3) 24.3 (4.54) 1.013 (0.966–1.062) 0.598
ASA classification
1 1423 (50.9) 64 (38.3) (ref) 0.002**
2 1088 (38.9) 76 (45.5) 1.976 (1.284–3.040) 0.002
3 280 (10.0) 27 (16.2) 1.870 (0.799–4.375) 0.149
Smoking
Never smoked 1497 (53.8) 90 (53.9) (ref) 0.974**
Ex-smoker > 12 months 735 (26.4) 40 (24.2) 0.844 (0.511–1.395) 0.508
Occasional smoker 111 (4.0) 7 (4.2) * 0.577
Daily smoker 439 (15.8) 29 (17.6) 0.987 (0.583–1.672) 0.961
Activities
None 1312 (47.2) 97 (58.8) (ref) 0.004**
Sporadic (<1 time a week) 415 (14.9) 21 (12.7) 0.715 (0.405–1.261) 0.246
Moderate (1 time a week 469 (16.9) 22 (13.3) 0.736 (0.417–1.299) 0.291
Intense (>1 a week) 586 (21.1) 25 (15.2) 0.739 (0.435–1.257) 0.265
Diabetes
No 2246 (80.3) 127 (76.0) (ref) 0.965**
Yes 126 (4.5) 7 (4.2) * 0.385
Hernia characteristics
Primary hernia 2617 (93.6) 153 (91.6) (ref) 0.314**
First recurrence 137 (4.9) 11 (6.6) 2.125 (1.015–4.450) 0.046
Second recurrence 16 (0.6) 3 (1.8) *
Lateral (total) 1965 (70.2) 124 (74.2)
L1 411 (14.7) 32 (19.2) (ref) 0.116**
L2 1034 (37.0) 64 (38.3) 0.850 (0.488–1.479) 0.565
L3 520 (18.6) 28 (16.8) 0.534 (0.258–1.102) 0.090
Medial (total) 1044 (37.3) 68 (40.7)
M1 180 (6.4) 15 (9.0) (ref) 0.198**
M2 521 (18.6) 28 (16.8) 0.726 (0.339–1.553) 0.409
M3 343 (12.3) 25 (15.0) 0.708 (0.309–1.624) 0.415
Femoral (total) 163 (5.8) 20 (12.0)
F1 72 (2.6) 8 (4.8) * *
F2 78 (2.8) 7 (4.2) * *
F3 13 (0.5) 5 (3.0) * *
Surgical characteristics
Open
Lichtenstein 612 (22.0) 53 (31.7) (ref) 0.004**
TIPP 834 (30.0) 35 (21.0) 0.485 (0.312–0.752) 0.001
Laparoendoscopic
TAPP 767 (27.6) 44 (26.3) 0.662 (0.438–1.002) 0.051
TEP 563 (20.2) 35 (21.0) 0.718 (0.461–1.117) 0.142
Received prosthetics 2719 (92.7) 164 (98.2)
Fixation
No fixation 1877 (67.1) 97 (58.1) (ref) 0.016**
Sutures
Resorbable 98 (3.5) 2 (1.2) * 0.997
Not resorbable 127 (4.5) 8 (4.8) * 0.271
Staples
Resorbable 439 (15.7) 28 (16.8) 0.897 (0.515–1.563) 0.702
Not resorbable 129 (4.6) 17 (10.2) 2.445 (1.210–4.940) 0.013
Glue 19 (0.7) 2 (1.2) * 0.627
Self-adhesive 68 (2.4) 10 (6.0) 5.550 (1.773–17.376) 0.003
Iliohypogastric nerve1:
Not identified 781 (54.0) 27 (30.7) (ref) 0.246**
Preserved 593 (41.0) 57 (64.8) 1.642 (0.777–3.466) 0.194
Resected 68 (4.7) 4 (4.5) * 0.953
Ilioinguinal nerve2:
Not identified 561 (38.8) 25 (28.4) (ref) 0.052**
Preserved 799 (55.2) 61 (69.3) 1.713 (1.062–2.763) 0.027
Resected 80 (5.5) 2 (2.3) * 0.438
Reoperations 12 (0.4) 3 (1.8) *
TEP repair showed a lower odds of having relevant pain when prosthetic meshes resulted in more relevant pain when compared to
compared to Lichtenstein repair (OR 0.616; 95% CI 0.398–0.953; p = no fixation (OR 2.948; 95% CI 1.233–7.049; p = 0.015).
0.029). In the no pain group, the prosthetic mesh was not fixated more A proportionally higher number of resections of the IHN was per
often than in the relevant pain group (p < 0.001). Self-adhesive formed in the relevant pain group (OR 2.800; 95% CI 1.150–6.816; p =
5
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
Table 3
Patients with no pain at 1 month, 1 year and 2 years versus patients with relevant pain at 2 years. Missing values were omitted from analyses.1: only Lichtenstein repairs
considered in analysis.2: only Lichtenstein and TIPP repairs considered in analysis. *: too few (<10) patients in group in order to interpret logistic regression. **: Chi-
squared test. OR: odds ratio. UV: univariable logistic regression. MV: multivariable logistic regression.
No pain N = 2796 (%) Relevant pain N = 247 (%) OR (UV, 95% CI) OR (MV, 95% CI) P-value
Patient characteristics
Age
≤60 years 842 (30.1) 103 (41.7) 1.450 (1.052–1.999) 0.023
>60 years 1952 (69.8) 144 (58.3) (ref)
Male sex 2552 (91.3) 204 (82.6) 0.490 (0.310–0.773) 0.002
ASA classification
1 1423 (50.9) 135 (54.7) (ref) 0.257**
2 1088 (38.9) 91 (36.8) 1.004 (0.717–1.407) 0.980
3 280 (10.0) 20 (8.1) 0.626 (0.255–1.536) 0.306
Smoking
Never smoked 1497 (53.8) 130 (52.8) (ref) 0.771**
Ex-smoker > 12 months 735 (26.4) 51 (20.7) 1.085 (0.733–1.606) 0.682
Occasional smoker 111 (4.0) 21 (8.5) 2.566 (1.490–4.417) < 0.001
Daily smoker 439 (15.8) 44 (17.9) 1.221 (0.811–1.838) 0.338
Activities
None 1312 (47.2) 121 (49.2) (ref) 0.542**
Sporadic (<1 time a week) 415 (14.9) 34 (13.8) 0.783 (0.496–1.237) 0.295
Moderate (1 time a week 469 (16.9) 40 (16.3) 0.786 (0.509–1.212) 0.276
Intense (>1 a week) 586 (21.1) 51 (20.7) 0.989 (0.673–1.452) 0.953
Diabetes
No 2246 (80.3) 214 (86.9) (ref) 0.050**
Yes 126 (4.5) 5 (2.0) * 0.065
Hernia characteristics
Primary hernia 2617 (93.6) 224 (90.7) (ref) 0.139
First recurrence 137 (4.8) 17 (6.9) 1.635 (0.875–3.053) 0.159
Second recurrence 16 (0.57) 2 (0.81) * 0.573
Lateral (total) 1965 (70.2) 180 (72.8)
L1 411 (14.7) 48 (26.3) (ref) 0.293
L2 1034 (37.0) 94 (38.1) 0.965 (0.629–1.482) 0.871
L3 520 (18.6) 38 (15.4) 0.725 (0.423–1.243) 0.242
Medial (total) 1044 (37.3) 83 (33.6)
M1 180 (6.4) 18 (7.3) (ref) 0.850
M2 521 (18.6) 37 (15.0) 1.018 (0.509–2.039) 0.959
M3 343 (12.3) 28 (11.3) 0.895 (0.416–1.925) 0.777
Femoral (total) 163 (5.8) 26 (10.5)
F1 72 (2.6) 12 (4.9) (ref) 0.036**
F2 78 (2.8) 9 (3.6) * 0.421
F3 13 (0.5) 5 (2.0) * 0.084
Surgical characteristics
Open
Lichtenstein 612 (22.0) 60 (24.4) (ref) 0.325**
TIPP 834 (30.0) 69 (28.0) 0.844 (0.588–1.211) 0.357
Laparoendoscopic
TAPP 767 (27.6) 79 (32.1) 1.051 (0.739–1.494) 0.784
TEP 563 (20.2) 34 (13.8) 0.616 (0.398–0.953) 0.029
Received prosthetics 2719 (97.2) 238 (97.2)
Fixation
No fixation 1877 (67.1) 140 (56.7) (ref) < 0.001**
Sutures
Resorbable 98 (3.5) 5 (2.0) * 0.221
Non-resorbable 127 (4.5) 18 (7.3) 0.983 (0.471–2.051) 0.963
Staples
Resorbable 439 (15.7) 39 (19.8) 1.357 (0.908–2.027) 0.136
Non-resorbable 129 (4.6) 11 (4.5) 1.008 (0.460–2.210) 0.984
Glue 19 (0.7) 1 (0.4) * 0.998
Self-adhesive 68 (2.4) 19 (7.7) 2.948 (1.233–7.049) 0.015
Iliohypogastric nerve1:
Not identified 781 (54.0) 56 (43.4) (ref) 0.199**
Preserved 593 (41.0) 59 (45.7) 1.404 (0.682–2.889) 0.357
Resected 68 (4.7) 14 (10.9) 2.800 (1.150–6.816) 0.023
Ilioinguinal nerve2:
Not identified 561 (38.8) 36 (27.9) (ref) 0.015**
Preserved 799 (55.3) 80 (62.0) 1.560 (1.038–2.346) 0.033
Resected 80 (5.5) 13 (10.1) 2.532 (1.288–4.979) 0.007
Reoperations 6 (0.2) 2 (0.8)
0.023). Non-identification of the IIN occurred more often in the relevant 95% CI 1.288–4.979; p = 0.007).
pain group (p = 0.015). The IIN being preserved resulted in a higher
odds of relevant pain, compared to not identifying the IIN (OR 1.560;
95% CI 1.038–2.346; p = 0.033). More relevant pain resulted from IIN 3.5. Quality of life assessment
resections when compared to non-identification of the IIN (OR 2.532;
Table 4 shows outcomes of QoL questionnaires of patients who had
6
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
7
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
and staples, resorbarble sutures and staples, glue and self-adhesive 6. Conclusion
prosthetics not requiring fixation. Significantly more relevant pain was
observed at one year and two years when fixation was used, although There is a low risk of developing CPIP after IH surgery. CPIP was
due to small numbers of patients, analyses on resorbable and non- relatively more apparent in patients with younger age, higher ASA
resorbable sutures are incomplete. This effect was most apparent classification, female gender, open surgery, and if fixation of prosthetic
when non-resorbable staples or self-adhesive prosthetics were used. This meshes was used. The present study found that postoperative pain at one
could be due to the fact that staples that were non-resorbable entrapped month is a relatively higher risk for later onset of CPIP, when compared
a nerve. Results from this study might indicate that the use of non- to preoperative pain. Patients could be informed if they experience CPIP
resorbable staples should be avoided in IH repair, as other types of fix at one year that they are likely to ameliorate their complaints at two-
ations are available. year follow-up. Patients presenting CPIP after two years seem to have
Cirocchi et al. [6] wrote an extensive review with respect to pro a different pain etiology than patients presenting CPIP at one year. The
phylactic nerve transection to prevent CPIP. As results varied between present study could aid surgeons when informing patients about the
studies, the authors made it clear that no conclusions could be drawn onset and course of CPIP after IH surgery.
from their meta-analysis. It is appreciable however, that pain on the
short postoperative period (i.e. six months postoperatively) declined Provenance and peer review
after neurectomy. However, at one year, the advantage of the neu
rectomy was no longer present. This could be attributed to neuroma Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
formation of the IIN or IHN, beginning at postoperative periods
exceeding three months [22]. Difference should be made however, in Ethical approval
the interpretation of the ‘not identified’ group. In TIPP repair, the
recommendation of identification of all three nerves is not standard All patients agreed to their data being stored in a pseudonymized
recommendation as it is with Lichtenstein’s repair [23]. Only the IIN manner in a protected databank in Switzerland. This registry is abiding
should be identified and preserved in TIPP repair, while the IHN is not at to the requirements of the French ‘Commission Nationale de l’Infor
risk due to absence of extensive pre-muscular dissection, and no fixation matique et des Libertés’ (CNIL; registration number 1993959v0).
is performed. This could be the main reason for the paradoxical CPIP
outcome in unidentified nerves. Next to this, it was not clear whether the Sources of funding
surgeons merely identified the nerves or actively searched for the nerve.
In ‘digging up’ the nerve, unintentional lesions to the nerve could have None.
taken place. Resection of both nerves seemed to lead to more CPIP
complaints at two years, which could be due to neuroma formation and Author contribution
the fact that resection of the nerve could require dissection locally
around it. L.M. van den Dop, MD: Study design, data analysis, writing
Differences in PROM answers between pain at one year and to year F.P.J. den Hartog, MD: Data analysis, writing
were present in time-dependent questions, while localization-specific D. Sneiders, MD: Data analysis, writing
answers were equal. As prior results suggest other factors to play a G. Kleinrensink, PhD: Study design, writing
role in the long-term pain perception, the same could be true for the J.F Lange, MD, PhD: Study design, writing
PROM answers. To underline this, patients experiencing pain at two J.F. Gillon, MD4: Study design, writing
years judge their CPIP as less of a nuisance compared to the pain they Hernia-Club Members: Data collection
experienced from their hernia, compared to patients experiencing pain
at one year (9.1% versus 17.4%, respectively). Furthermore, patients Conflicts of interest
experiencing pain at two years predominantly (78.5%) assess their
surgery as good or excellent while patients experiencing pain at one year None.
asses their surgery as good or excellent in a mere 55.7%.
Research registration Unique Identifying number (UIN)
5. Limitations
Name of the registry: Researchregistry.com.
The present study is based on retrospective data from a prospectively Unique Identifying number or registration ID: Researchregistry7671.
maintained cohort. As patient inclusion into this database is not ran https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#home/registrat
domized, although the experienced surgeons that include patients iondetails/621399ce0d04e5001e4c5ba4/
attempt to minimize selection, there will undoubtedly be some form of
selection bias present in the selected sample of patients. Guarantor
Surgeons that participate in the Hernia Club database are experi
enced hernia surgeons. Inguinal hernia surgery is not only performed by L.M. van den Dop, MD.
hernia surgeons, but also by most other types of surgeons around the
world. This inhibits the ability to generalize the outcomes of the Hernia Acknowledgements
Club database to the broader surgeon community.
Identifying the characteristics that make one group different from We thank members of the Club-Hernie members for input of their
another in a non-randomized setting, using their baseline and surgical data, and therefore the making of this study.
characteristics, can be done by statistical analysis, which can bring forth
correlations between these characteristics and the outcomes that are Appendix A. Supplementary data
assessed. However, this does not directly mean that there is a direct
causal connection between these characteristics and the patients’ out Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.
comes. Results from this study should therefore be taken with caution. org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106837.
8
L.M. van den Dop et al. International Journal of Surgery 105 (2022) 106837
References [13] B. Romain, T. Fabacher, P. Ortega-Deballon, L. Montana, J.P. Cossa, J.F. Gillion, et
al., Longitudinal cohort study on preoperative pain as a risk factor for chronic
postoperative inguinal pain after groin hernia repair at 2-year follow-up, Hernia 26
[1] J.F. Lange, V.M. Meyer, D.A. Voropai, E. Keus, A.R. Wijsmuller, R.J. Ploeg, et al.,
(1) (2022) 189–200.
The role of surgical expertise with regard to chronic postoperative inguinal pain
[14] R.N. van Veen, A.R. Wijsmuller, W.W. Vrijland, W.C. Hop, J.F. Lange, J. Jeekel,
(CPIP) after Lichtenstein correction of inguinal hernia: a systematic review, Hernia
Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus non-mesh primary inguinal hernia repair:
20 (3) (2016) 349–356.
long-term chronic pain at 10 years, Surgery 142 (5) (2007) 695–698.
[2] J. Scholz, N.B. Finnerup, N. Attal, Q. Aziz, R. Baron, M.I. Bennett, et al., The IASP
[15] G. Mathew, R. Agha, S. Group, STROCSS 2021: strengthening the reporting of
classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic neuropathic pain, Pain 160 (1)
cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery, Ann Med Surg (Lond).
(2019) 53–59.
72 (2021), 103026.
[3] J.F. Lange, R. Kaufmann, A.R. Wijsmuller, J.P. Pierie, R.J. Ploeg, D.C. Chen, et al.,
[16] I. Kyle-Leinhase, F. Kockerling, L.N. Jorgensen, A. Montgomery, J.F. Gillion, J.A.
An international consensus algorithm for management of chronic postoperative
P. Rodriguez, et al., Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project, Hernia 22
inguinal pain, Hernia 19 (1) (2015) 33–43.
(4) (2018) 561–575.
[4] C. Nikkolo, U. Lepner, Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair, Postgrad.
[17] G.H.J. de Smet, D. Sneiders, Y. Yurtkap, A.G. Menon, J. Jeekel, G.J. Kleinrensink,
Med. 128 (1) (2016) 69–75.
et al., Functional outcomes in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients
[5] W. Reinpold, Risk factors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic
undergoing incisional hernia repair: replacing one problem with another? A
review, Innov Surg Sci 2 (2) (2017) 61–68.
prospective cohort study in 1312 patients, Int. J. Surg. 82 (2020) 76–84.
[6] R. Cirocchi, M. Sutera, P. Fedeli, G. Anania, P. Covarelli, F. Suadoni, et al.,
[18] M. Miserez, J.H. Alexandre, G. Campanelli, F. Corcione, D. Cuccurullo, M.
Ilioinguinal nerve neurectomy is better than preservation in Lichtenstein hernia
H. Pascual, et al., The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple
repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, World J. Surg. 45 (6)
and easy to remember, Hernia 11 (2) (2007) 113–116.
(2021) 1750–1760.
[19] M.F. Bjurstrom, M.R. Irwin, D.C. Chen, M.T. Smith, A. Montgomery, Sex
[7] N. Crea, G. Pata, Effects of prophylactic ilioinguinal nerve excision in mesh groin
differences, sleep disturbance and risk of persistent pain associated with groin
hernia repair: short- and long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial, Am.
hernia surgery: a nationwide register-based cohort study, J. Pain 22 (11) (2021)
Surg. 76 (11) (2010) 1275–1281.
1360–1370.
[8] F. Karakayali, E. Oksuz, E. Turk, M. Pekmez, Z. Karabulut, T. Yilmaz, et al.,
[20] U. Dahlstrand, G. Sandblom, P. Nordin, S. Wollert, U. Gunnarsson, Chronic pain
Effectiveness of multiple neurectomies to prevent chronic groin pain after tension-
after femoral hernia repair: a cross-sectional study, Ann. Surg. 254 (6) (2011)
free hernia repair, Int. Surg. 95 (1) (2010) 40–48.
1017–1021.
[9] B. de Goede, P.J. Klitsie, B.J. van Kempen, L. Timmermans, J. Jeekel, G. Kazemier,
[21] G. HerniaSurge, International guidelines for groin hernia management, Hernia 22
et al., Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal
(1) (2018) 1–165.
hernia repair, Br. J. Surg. 100 (6) (2013) 735–742.
[22] A. Yavuz, H. Kulacoglu, E. Olcucuoglu, S. Hucumenoglu, C. Ensari, Z. Ergul, et al.,
[10] A. Kaul, S. Hutfless, H. Le, S.A. Hamed, K. Tymitz, H. Nguyen, et al., Staple versus
The faith of ilioinguinal nerve after preserving, cutting, or ligating it: an
fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a
experimental study of mesh placement on inguinal floor, J. Surg. Res. 171 (2)
systematic review and meta-analysis, Surg. Endosc. 26 (5) (2012) 1269–1278.
(2011) 563–570.
[11] U. Franneby, G. Sandblom, P. Nordin, O. Nyren, U. Gunnarsson, Risk factors for
[23] J.F. Gillion, J.M. Chollet, Chronic pain and quality of life (QoL) after transinguinal
long-term pain after hernia surgery, Ann. Surg. 244 (2) (2006) 212–219.
preperitoneal (TIPP) inguinal hernia repair using a totally extraperitoneal,
[12] B. Romain, J.F. Gillion, P. Ortega-Deballon, N. Meyer, H. Club, Patient’s
parietalized, Polysoft (R) memory ring patch : a series of 622 hernia repairs in 525
satisfaction at 2 years after groin hernia repair: any difference according to the
patients, Hernia 17 (6) (2013) 683–692.
technique? Hernia 22 (5) (2018) 801–812.