THE TRUE DOCTRINE OF THE GLOBE EARTH

A Scriptural View Of The Universe

By David Nikao

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine,

for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly
furnished unto all good works.”
2 Timothy 3:16-17
The True Doctrine Of The Globe Earth – A Scriptural View Of The
Universe is authored and published by David Nikao.

Please don’t share this PDF with others. Instead, you’re welcome
to share this link so that people can request their own copy of the
PDF. This helps me know how many people are getting the book.

Website: BiblicalGeocentrism.com

I’m not trying to make money with book sales, but if you were
blessed by the book, I would appreciate your support. It helps me
commit my time to writing more studies and books, to help the
saints see Scriptural truth. Thank you!

Copyright 2020 by David Nikao

ISBN: 978-1692549381
Rev: 030420

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,

stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
means – electronic, mechanical, digital, photocopy, recording, or
any other – except for brief quotations in printed reviews, without
prior permission of the author.

Fair Use of Published Material: This book claims the use of

published material under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, in
which allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism,
comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
See the Act of 1976 for information. …………………………………….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976

Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are taken from the

King James Version of the Bible.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 1
1. Flat Earth Beliefs Summary 4
2. The False Dichotomy 6
3. Believers In Geocentrism 10
4. Smoke And Mirrors 16
5. Exegesis vs. Eisegesis 23
6. The Genesis Account 25
7. The Firmament 28
8. The Three Levels Of Heaven 32
9. The Sun Is Moving 34
10. The Circuit Of The Sun 41
11. The Sun Was Stopped 46
12. The Sun Was Moved Back 48
13. The Earth Is Fixed 50
14. The Circle Of Isaiah 40:22 54
15. The Canopy Of Stars 60
16. The Father's Throne 66
17. The Gospel In The Stars 69
18. Heavenly Intrigue 76
19. The Geocentric Universe 84
20. The Jesuit Deception 98
21. The Copernican Shift 110
22. Believer’s False Science 115
23. Summary 121
24. Your Conclusion 125

“How much better is it to get wisdom than gold!

And to get understanding rather to be chosen than silver!”
Proverbs 16:16
 Psalms 19
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament
sheweth his handywork. Day unto day uttereth speech,
and night unto night sheweth knowledge.

There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.

Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to
the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun.

Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth

as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is from the end of
the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is
nothing hid from the heat thereof.

The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony
of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the
LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the
LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes.

The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments
of the LORD are true and righteous altogether. More to be
desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold:
sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.

Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them

there is great reward. Who can understand his errors?
cleanse thou me from secret faults.

Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not
have dominion over me: then shall I be upright, and I shall be
innocent from the great transgression. Let the words of my mouth,
and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight,
O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer. HalleluYah!
 Introduction

My primary assignment in these end times is teaching prophecy

fulfillment explanations and exposing the many deceptions that the
enemy has created.

So when people around me started saying that the earth is flat,

I took notice. My gut reaction was that it’s silly, but I don’t want to
be misled, so I watched a lot of flat earth videos and read many
articles. I found that they have no scientific explanations for how it
works, and they have no photographic evidence, just CGI graphics.

Flat-earthers share a list of 240 Bible verses that supposedly

describes a flat-earth with a glass dome over it. When I read the list,
I was appalled at how badly they are taking verses out of context,
and I was compelled to write a book to expose this deception.

The goal with my The False Doctrine Of The Flat Earth book is to
debunk that Scripture describes a flat earth.

If you know flat-earthers, it gives a fresh

perspective about the major concepts
that flat-earthers cite.

It provides insight on the 'firmament' of

Genesis; the 'circle' of Isaiah 40:22; the
clay turned to the 'seal' in Job 38:13-14;
the 'pillars' of 1 Samuel 2:8; and explains
the context of the 240 verses that flat-
earthers cite.

And it proves that the earth is a globe.

As I studied the context of the verses, it became apparent that the

heliocentric model, which has a stationary sun and a revolving
earth, is contrary to what Scripture is describing. Excuses have to be
made for the literal language of Scripture to make it fit the
heliocentric model.

And I found that the only model that doesn’t require excuses is the
geocentric globe earth model, which fits perfectly with all that’s
described in Scripture.

Scripture declares that the sun is moving in a circuit and that it’s
been stopped and moved back under special circumstances. One has
to make excuses to justify the heliocentric globe earth model, as the
sun does not move, so it can’t be stopped or moved back.

Many verses declare that the sun rises and sets, some of them
stating the case from the sun’s perspective, not ours. There’s no
reason not to take them literally, and that only happens with a
geocentric universe which has a sun that’s moving in a circuit.

Scripture never declares that the earth rotates around the sun;
rather, it says that it’s fixed in place. Scripture only says that the
earth is moved during prophetic circumstances, which point to
something that’s outside of the norm, such as an end-times event.

If one is honest, without pressing their beliefs onto Scripture,

there’s no way to conclude that the earth is orbiting the sun. If you
have to make excuses to justify your view, then you’re not allowing
the text to speak. Scripture should be taken literally unless the
context proves otherwise.

Biblical creationists have done an amazing job at proving how the

creation of the earth matches up with the Genesis account, to
counter the scientific community about the age of the earth, to
dismiss the theory of evolution. They demand that science be
subjugated to the Bible.

Unfortunately, they’ve subjugated the Bible to modern science

regarding the orientation of the earth in the universe. There is no
Scriptural justification for the heliocentric model, so why do they
teach it?

I say ‘modern science’ because up until the 16th century, scientists and
theologians believed in the geocentric model. All of that has been
swept under the rug and hidden by the enemy.

During my research, it became clear that the enemy is using the flat
earth theory to effectively hide proof of the geocentric universe.

I pray that you can put aside your preconceived notions and take
an honest look at what Scripture is declaring. I’ve used the King
James, as it’s a good translation which is well-known. I add Strong’s
Hebrew and Greek word definitions, and other Bible translations
when they help us see what Scripture is describing.

May our Heavenly Father bless you in this study of His Word!

David Nikao

p.s. I don’t make my prophecy fulfillment websites or YouTube

videos about me. I don’t post my face all over Facebook, YouTube,
my websites, etc.; because the emphasis is on Scriptural truth, and
on bringing glory to our Heavenly Father and Messiah; not on me.
The same is true for this book. I’m just the servant who is tasked
with providing a Scriptural view of the universe. The focus is on the
Scriptures of our Heavenly Father, which glorify Him.
 CHAPTER 1
Flat Earth Beliefs Summary

You may or may not know any flat-earthers, as it’s primarily a

Facebook and YouTube phenomenon. They believe that the earth is
not a globe, but a flat disc which has a glass-dome firmament over it.
They say that the sun and moon were created to rotate above the
flat earth.

They use many Bible verses to justify this belief, intermixing the
Hebrew words about the firmament, heaven, and the sky; to point to a
glass dome that encloses the earth.

They proclaim that the flat earth sits upon pillars and that there is
water below the flat earth, and water above the glass dome which
creates the blue sky.
Flat-earthers believe that the world has been deceived about the
shape of the earth because the enemy wants to hide that there’s a
Creator; to promote the theory of evolution, which is based on the
heliocentric model. And they think that most Pastors and believers
have been deceived about the design of the universe.

Sadly, they’re right, Pastors and believers have been deceived about
the orientation of the universe. Flat-earthers understand some
Scriptural truth, that the sun is moving and that the earth is not.

But they’ve been deceived about it being flat, and they’re being
used by the enemy to cause believers to cast aside anything to do
with a geocentric earth; thus they are complicit in the deception.

Flat-earthers wrongly proclaim that their model is geocentric. A

geocentric model has the globe earth at the center, and the universe
is revolving around it, not above it.

Hardly anyone talks about the geocentric universe model, as the

debate is between flat-earthers and heliocentric globe-earthers. And
that’s exactly what the enemy wants, for people to ignore the
evidence for geocentrism.

“I write not these things to shame you, but as my

beloved brothers and sisters in Messiah I warn you.”
1 Corinthians 4:14
 CHAPTER 2
The False Dichotomy

When I look on Facebook, YouTube, and websites; not many people

are discussing the Tychonic geocentric earth option. The debate is
only between heliocentric globe-earthers and flat-earthers.

This caused an ‘aha!’ moment. It woke me up to see that the enemy

has created a false dichotomy, to cause the debate to be between the
heliocentric globe earth and the flat earth; so that people ignore the
Biblical and scientific proof of the geocentric globe earth.

They’ve hidden it by proclaiming that the earth revolves around the

sun; which led to the big bang theory, the theory of evolution, etc.;
all of which steals glory from our Creator and deceives people.

And now they’re hiding it with the flat-earth theory, which is

becoming increasingly popular among believers.

Interestingly, the Illuminati card game has a ‘Flat Earthers’ card that
says, “People laugh, but the flat-earthers know something.”

That “something” is that the earth isn’t flying through space at

66,000 MPH, orbiting the sun, because it’s at the center of the
universe. They’re wrong that it’s flat but right that it’s not moving.
If you don’t know about the Illuminati card game, it was made by
the evil ones who foretell events that they cause to happen; as they
take control of the world, and push it into a Satanic One World
Government. The cards reveal clues about their agenda, as they
seem to have a code of ethics, if you will, to foretell their evil plans.

Our earthly perspective of the planets and stars appears the same
regardless of whether it’s a Copernican heliocentric model or a
Tychonic geocentric model. There’s no way for us to tell the
difference, and only people at a very high-level know the truth.

Though people proclaim that the universe is heliocentric, we can’t

blindly trust those explanations, for in these end-times the enemy
controls the scientific world. We’ll look to see what Scripture
proclaims, for it’s our authority.
The Tychonic geocentric earth model was published by Tycho
Brahe in the late 16th century. Other geocentric models simply
switch the sun and earth, and the planets and the sun revolve in
circles around the earth.

Brahe proposed that the sun is revolving around the earth and the
planets are revolving around the sun, which explains the retrograde
motion of planets. Interestingly, Tycho was murdered to hide his
witness, and since then, the enemy has pushed heliocentrism.

It wasn’t until scientific probes produced data about the radiation

of the expanding universe, and the orientation of the quasars and
radio galaxies; that researchers were able to see that all of those
things are pointing back to Earth as the center of the universe.

These findings were published in a book titled ‘Geocentrism 101 –

An Introduction into the Science of Geocentric Cosmology‘ in 2013 and
then explained in a movie called The Principle in late 2014.

Then shortly afterward, the flat earth theory started to be

aggressively pushed on YouTube and Facebook.
The enemy has created a false dichotomy to make the debate between
the flat earth and the heliocentric universe; so that people don’t
consider the third option, the geocentric globe-earth universe.

It puts the earth at the center of the universe, proving a

Designer/Creator, and explains why stars perfectly circle the Earth;
while maintaining the laws of physics of the globe earth and the
elaborate surrounding universe, which is a precision time-piece.

The heliocentric model has given rise to explanations of evolution,

but the geocentric model destroys that narrative. I pray that you
approach this Bible study with an open mind to see what Scripture
is proclaiming.

“For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but
according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will
heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from
the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”
2 Timothy 4:3-4
 CHAPTER 3
Believers In Geocentrism

The Greek Empire was renowned for their knowledge of

astronomy, and all of the astronomers believed in the geocentric
universe; with one exception, a man named Aristarchus of Samos.

Aristarchus lived from 310-230 BC, and he was the first person to
propose the heliocentric model, placing the sun at the center of the
universe. The Greeks revered the sun god, Helios, so perhaps this is
why Aristarchus created a model with him at the center.

Here’s a picture of the sun god Helios from the early 4th century
BC, riding in his chariot. Ironically, that points to a moving sun.

An astronomer named Hipparchus refuted Aristarchus’ theory,

with a detailed explanation in 130 BC. From this point until Nicolas
Copernicus in the 16th century, nobody promoted heliocentrism.

Before we get into the Scriptural explanations, I want you to see

that before the enemy pushed the deception of the heliocentric
universe, the saints believed that the universe is geocentric. They
believed that the earth is fixed in the center and that the sun runs its
circuit around the earth.
Citing these quotes is not declaring that I agree with all that they
taught about theology, rather I’m simply pointing out that they
believed in a geocentric universe.

Aurelius Ambrosius (340–397), known as Ambrose, said: “But the

sun himself has many things in common with the stars, for he travels
across the heavens, he is of that ethereal and heavenly substance, he is a
creature, and is reckoned amongst all the works of God.” (1)

Aphrahat (280-345) said: “For the sun in twelve hours circles round,
from the east unto the west; and when he has accomplished his course, his
light is hidden in the night-time, and the night is not disturbed by his
power. And in the hours of the night, the sun turns round in his rapid
course, and turning round begins to run in his accustomed path." (2)

Athanasius (296-298) said: “but the earth is not supported upon itself,
but is set upon the realm of the waters, while this again is kept in its place,
being bound fast at the center of the universe.” (3)

“For who that sees the circle of heaven and the course of the sun and the
moon, and the positions and movements of the other stars, as they take
place in opposite and different directions, while yet in their difference all
with one accord observe a consistent order, can resist the conclusion that
these are not ordered by themselves, but have a maker distinct from
themselves who orders them? or who that sees the sun rising by day and
the moon shining by night, and waning and waxing without variation
exactly according to the same number of days, and some of the stars
running their courses and with orbits various and manifold, while others
move without wandering, can fail to perceive that they certainly have a
creator to guide them?” (4)

Athenagoras of Athens (133-190) said: “To Him is for us to know who

stretched out and vaulted the heavens, and fixed the earth in its place like a
center.” (5)

Augustine of Hippo (354-430) said: “Let not the philosophers, then,

think to upset our faith with arguments from the weight of bodies; for I
don’t care to inquire why they cannot believe an earthly body can be in
heaven, while the whole earth is suspended on nothing. For perhaps the
world keeps its central place by the same law that attracts to its center all
heavy bodies.” (6)

“For an eclipse of the sun had also happened; and this was attributed to the
divine power of Romulus by the ignorant multitude, who did not know
that it was brought about by the fixed laws of the sun’s course.” (7)

“This he said either of those things of which he had just been speaking–the
succession of generations, the orbit of the sun, the course of rivers,–or else
of all kinds of creatures. that are born and die.” (8)

“But we read in the divine books that even the sun itself stood still when a
holy man, Joshua the son of Nun, had begged this from God until victory
should finish the battle he had begun; and that it even went back, that the
promise of fifteen years added to the life of king Hezekiah might be sealed
by this additional prodigy. But these miracles, which were vouchsafed to
the merits of holy men, even when our adversaries believe them, they
attribute to magical arts; so Virgil, in the lines I quoted above, ascribes to
magic the power to “Turn rivers backward to their source, And make the
stars forget their course.” (9)

“Who else save Joshua the son of Nun divided the stream of the Jordan for
the people to pass over, and by the utterance of a prayer to God bridled and
stopped the revolving sun? Who save Samson ever quenched his thirst
with water flowing forth from the jawbone of a dead ass? Who save Elias
was carried aloft in a chariot of fire?” (10)

Basil of Caesarea (330-379) said: “There are inquirers into nature who
with a great display of words give reasons for the immobility of the
earth…It is not, they go on, without reason or by chance that the earth
occupies the center of the universe. Do not then be surprised that the world
never falls: it occupies the center of the universe, its natural place.” (11)

John Cassian (360-435) said: “He was a man who, after the close of his
life had been decreed and the day of his death determined by the Lord’s
sentence, prevailed by a single prayer to extend the limits set to his life by
fifteen years, the sun returning by ten steps, on which it had already shone
in its course towards its setting, and by its return dispersing those lines
which the shadow that followed its course had already marked, and by this
giving two days in one to the whole world, by a stupendous miracle
contrary to the fixed laws of nature.” (12)

John Chrysostom (349-407) said: “And what took place at a later period
were few and at intervals; for example, when the sun stood still in its
course, and started back in the opposite direction.” (13) “But, on the other
hand, the sun with the rest of the stars, runs on his course through every
day. And again, the earth is fixed, but the waters are continually in
motion; and not the waters only, but the clouds, and the frequent and
successive showers, which return at their proper season.” (14)

“Therefore it was, that Joshua, the son of Nave, said, “Let the sun stand
still in Gibeon, and the moon over against the valley of Ajalon.” And
again the prophet Isaiah made the sun to retrace his steps, under the reign
of Hezekiah; and Moses gave orders to the air, and the sea, the earth, and
the rocks.” (15)

Clement of Rome (35-99) said: “The sun and moon, with the companies
of the stars, roll on in harmony according to His command, within their
prescribed limits, and without any deviation.” (16)

“For it is manifest even to the unbelieving and unskilful, that the course of
the sun, which is useful and necessary to the world, and which is assigned
by providence, is always kept orderly; but the courses of the moon, in
comparison of the course of the sun, seem to the unskilful to be inordinate
and unsettled in her waxings and wanings. For the sun moves in fixed and
orderly periods: for from him are hours, from him the day when he rises,
from him also the night when he sets; from him months and years are
reckoned, from him the variations of seasons are produced; while rising to
the higher regions, he tempers the spring; but when he reaches the top of
the heaven, he kindles the summer’s heats: again, sinking, he produces the
temper of autumn; and when he returns to his lowest circle, he bequeaths
to us the rigour of winter’s cold from the icy binding of heaven.” (17)

Cyril of Jerusalem (313-386) said: “And he, who could not hope to live
because of the prophetic sentence, had fifteen years added to his life, and for
the sign, the sun ran backward in his course.” (18)

Ephraim the Syrian (306-373) said: “The sun in his course teaches thee
that thou rest from labour.” (19)

Eusebius (260-340) said: “The vast expanse of heaven, like an azure veil
is interposed between those without, and those who inhabit his royal
mansions: while round this expanse the sun and moon, with the rest of the
heavenly luminaries (like torch-bearers around the entrance of the imperial
palace), perform, in honor of their sovereign, their appointed courses;
holding forth, at the word of his command, an ever-burning light to those
whose lot is cast in the darker regions without the pale of heaven.” (20)

“To whom he has permitted the contemplation of celestial objects, and

revealed the course and changes of the sun and moon, and the periods of
the planets and fixed stars.” (21)

Gregory of Nanzianzus (329-390) said: “The sun is extolled by David

for its beauty, its greatness, its swift course, and its power, splendid as a
bridegroom, majestic as a giant; while, from the extent of its circuit, it has
such power that it equally sheds its light from one end of heaven to the
other, and the heat thereof is in no wise lessened by distance.” (22)
Gregory of Nyssa (335-395) said: “The vault of heaven prolongs itself so
uninterruptedly that it encircles all things with itself, and that the earth
and its surroundings are poised in the middle, and that the motion of all
the revolving bodies is round this fixed and solid center.” (23)

Gregory Thaumaturgos (213-270) said: “And the life of men weareth

away, as day by day, and in the periods of hours and years, and the
determinate courses of the sun, some are ever coming, and others passing
away. And the matter is like the transit of torrents as they fall into the
measureless deep of the sea with a mighty noise. And all things that have
been constituted by God for the sake of men abide the same: as, for
instance, I that man is born of earth, and departs to earth again; that the
earth itself continues stable; that the sun accomplishes its circuit about it
perfectly, and rolls round to the same mark again; and that the winds in
like manner, and the mighty rivers which flow into the sea, and the breezes
that beat upon it, all act without forcing it to pass beyond its limits, and
without themselves also violating their appointed laws.” (24)

Hippolytus of Rome (170-235) said: “We find in the commentaries,

written by our predecessors, that day had thirty-two hours. For when the
sun had run its course, and reached the tenth hour, and the shadow had
gone down by the ten degrees in the house of the temple, the sun turned
back again by the ten degrees, according to the word of the Lord, and there
were thus twenty hours. And again, the sun accomplished its own proper
course, according to the common law, and reached its setting. And thus
there were thirty-two hours.” (25)

“For what richer beauty can there be than that of the circle of heaven? And
what form of more blooming fairness than that of earth’s surface? And
what is there swifter in the course than the chariot of the sun? And what
more graceful car than the lunar orb? And what work more wonderful
than the compact mosaic of the stars? And what more productive of
supplies than the seasonable winds? And what more spotless mirror than
the light of day? And what creature more excellent than man?” (26)
Irenaeus (130-202) said: “The sun also, who runs through his orbit in
twelve months, and then returns to the same point in the circle.” (27)

Jerome (347-420) said: “In Exodus we read that the battle was fought
against Amalek while Moses prayed, and the whole people fasted until the
evening. Joshua, the son of Nun, bade sun and moon stand still, and the
victorious army prolonged its fast for more than a day.” (28)

“The moon may dispute over her eclipses and ceaseless toil, and ask why
she must traverse every month the yearly orbit of the sun. The sun may
complain and want to know what he has done that he travels more slowly
than the moon.” (29)

John of Damascus (675-749) said: “For it is night when the sun is under
the earth, and the duration of night is the course of the sun under the earth
from its rising till its setting.” (30)

“Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their
Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.”
Matthew 13:43
 CHAPTER 4
Smoke And Mirrors

Physicists and astronomers say that both the heliocentric and

Tychonic geocentric models of the universe are plausible, for they
look the same from an earthly perspective. But they use the
heliocentric model for philosophical reasons, as they can’t explain a
Designer in their theories, and many refuse to acknowledge a
divine Creator.

It’s important to understand that from our earthly viewpoint, we

cannot tell the difference between the heliocentric universe and the
Tychonic geocentric universe; because it helps you see how the
enemy is able to hide the truth easily.

Einstein’s General Theory Of Relativity confirmed that it’s relative to

your viewpoint; so he effectively proclaimed that the heliocentric
and Tychonic geocentric universes are both valid models.

Here’s a snapshot of the comparison of the annual cycle. From

earth, the perspective looks the same on both models.

Here’s a snapshot of the comparison of the daily cycle. Again from

earth, the perspective looks the same on both models.
This could easily be hidden from most people, as they can’t
perceive the difference. Those who work in aviation, satellite
technology, etc.; can’t tell the difference, for the scientific principles
which govern the earth works the same. Only high-level people at
space agencies such as NASA would know the difference, allowing
them to keep it hidden.

Here are some quotes from Robert Sungenis' documentary Journey

to the Center of the Universe, which show that both models yield the
same earthly perspective.

Physicist Max Born said: "Thus we may return to Ptolemy's point of

view of a 'motionless Earth' This would mean that we use a system of
reference rigidly fixed to the Earth in which all stars are performing a
rotational motion with the same angular velocity around the Earth's
axis...one has to show that the transformed metric can be regarded as
produced according to Einstein's field equations, by distant rotating
masses. This has been done by Thirring.

He calculated a field due to a rotating, hollow, thick-walled sphere and

proved that inside the cavity it behaved as though there were centrifugal
and other inertial forces usually attributed to absolute space. Thus from
Einstein's point of view, Ptolemy and Copernicus are equally right. What
point of view is chosen is a matter of expediency."

Astronomy Historian John Louis Emil Dreyer said about the Earth-
centered system: “(it) is in reality absolutely identical with the system of
Copernicus and all computation of the places of the planets are the same
for the two systems.”

Physicist Martin Gardner said: "The ancient argument over whether the
Earth rotates or the heavens revolve around it (as Aristotle taught) is seen
to be no more than an argument over the simplest choice of a frame of
reference. Obviously, the most convenient choice is the universe....Nothing
except inconvenience prevents us from choosing the Earth as a fixed frame
of reference....If we choose to make the Earth our fixed frame of reference,
we do not even do violence to everyday speech. We say that the sun rises in
the morning, sets in the evening; the Big Dipper revolves around the
North Star. Which point of view is "correct"? Do the heavens revolve or
does the Earth rotate. The question is meaningless."

Astronomer Fred Hoyle, the British astronomer who coined the

term “big bang” and formulated the theory of stellar
nucleosynthesis, said: “Let it be understood at the outset that it makes
no difference, from the point of view of describing planetary motion,
whether we take the Earth or the Sun as the center of the solar system.
Since the issue is one of relative motion only, there are infinitely many
exactly equivalent descriptions referred to different centers – in principle
any point will do, the Moon, Jupiter…So the passions loosed on the world
by the publication of Copernicus’ book, De revolutionibus orbium
caelestium libri VI, were logically irrelevant.”

"...we can take either the Earth or the Sun, or any other point for that
matter, as the center of the solar system. This is certainly so for the purely
kinematical problem of describing the planetary motions. It is also possible
to take any point as the center even in dynamics, although recognition of
this freedom of choice had to await the present century.”

"Tycho Brahe proposed a dualistic scheme, with the Sun going around the
Earth but with all other planets going around the Sun, and in making this
proposal he thought he was offering something radically different from
Copernicus. And in rejecting Tycho's scheme, Kepler obviously thought so
too. Yet in principle there is no difference."

Physicist Arthur Lynch said: “Descartes is, however, doubly interesting

to us in the discussion of Relativity, for at one time when the Inquisition
was becoming uneasy about his scientific researches, he gave them a reply
that satisfied them, or perhaps he merely gained time, which was long,
while they were trying to understand its meaning. He declared that the
sun went around the Earth, and that when he said that the Earth revolved
round the sun that was merely another manner of expressing the same
occurrence. I met with this saying first from Henri Poincaré, and I
thought then that it was a witty, epigrammatic way of compelling thought
to the question; but on reflection I saw that it was a statement of actual
fact. The movements of the two bodies are relative one to the other, and it
is a matter of choice as to which we take as our place of observation."

Physicist Isaac Newton said: "In order for the Earth to be at rest in the
center of the system of the sun, planets, and comets, there is required both
universal gravity and another force in addition that acts on all bodies
equally according to the quantity of matter in each of them and is equal
and opposite to the accelerative gravity with which the Earth tends to the
sun...And thus celestial bodies can move around the Earth at rest, as in the
Tychonic system."

Physicist Hans Reichenbach said: "It is very important to acknowledge

that the Copernican theory offers a very exact calculation of the apparent
movements of the planets...even though it must be conceded that, from the
modern standpoint practically identical results could be obtained by means
of a somewhat revised Ptolemaic system....It makes no sense, accordingly,
to speak of a difference in truth between Copernicus and Ptolemy: both
conceptions are equally permissible descriptions. What has been considered
as the greatest discovery of occidental wisdom, as opposed to that of
antiquity, is questioned as to its truth value."

Philosopher Bertrand Russell said: "Before Copernicus, people thought

that the Earth stood still and that the heavens revolved about it once a day.
Copernicus taught that 'really' the Earth revolves once a day, and the
daily rotation of the sun and stars is only 'apparent.' Galileo and Newton
endorsed this view, and many things were thought to prove it - for
example, the flattening of the Earth at the poles, and the fact that bodies
are heavier there than at the equator. But in the modern theory the
question between Copernicus and his predecessors is merely one of
convenience; all motion is relative, and there is no difference between the
two statements: 'the earth rotates once a day' and 'the heavens revolve
about the Earth once a day.' The two mean exactly the same thing, just as
it means the same thing if I say that a certain length is six feet or two
yards. Astronomy is easier if we take the sun as fixed than if we take the
Earth, just as accounts are easier in decimal coinage. But to say more for
Copernicus is to assume absolute motion, which is a fiction. All motion is
relative, and it is a mere convention to take one body as at rest. All such
conventions are equally legitimate, though not all are equally convenient."

British Physicist Dennis Sciama said: “Whether the Earth rotates once
a day from west to east, as Copernicus taught, or the heavens revolve once
a day from east to west, as his predecessors believed, the observable
phenomena will be exactly the same. This shows a defect in Newtonian
dynamics, since an empirical science ought not to contain a metaphysical
assumption, which can never be proved or disproved by observation.”

Science writer Kitty Ferguson said: "It is possible to describe the entire
universe using any chosen point as the unmoving center - the Earth will
do very well - and no one can prove that choice is wrong. Scientists today
prefer to picture everything in motion and nothing as being the center. If
you haven't given much thought to the implications of twentieth-century
science, you may be chagrined to realize that because of the concept of
relative motion, no one can prove that the Earth moves." (1)

The conclusion is that we can’t tell the difference between the

heliocentric universe and the Tychonic geocentric universe, based
on our viewpoint. And that allows the enemy to create a grand
deception, as they control the scientific world and NASA.

Scientists promote the heliocentric model based on philosophic

reasons because the geocentric model proves that there is a
Designer, a Creator; and they can’t or won’t have that as part of
their explanations.

Since we can’t tell the difference between the heliocentric and

geocentric models from our perspective; and Scripture describes a
universe where the sun runs a circular course, and the earth is
fixed; we are compelled to side with the Biblical-Geocentric
explanation.

“When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the
stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of
him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?”
Psalms 8:3-4
 CHAPTER 5
Exegesis vs. Eisegesis

Exegesis is the exposition or explanation of a text, based on careful,

objective analysis. The word exegesis means “to lead out of,” which
describes an interpreter being led to his conclusions by following
the passage in its proper context.

The opposite approach to Scripture is eisegesis, which is the

interpretation of a passage based on a subjective, non-analytical
reading. The word eisegesis means “to lead into,” which describes an
interpreter injecting their ideas into the text, making it seem to fit
with their beliefs.

The Bible is primarily literal, except for parables and prophetic

passages which use symbolism to hide the message from those who
shouldn’t understand it. Our default approach should be to take
Scripture literally until proven otherwise by the context.

I say this because both flat-earthers and those who believe in the
heliocentric globe earth, tend to proclaim that verses are symbolic
when the literal explanation doesn’t fit their model.

If Scripture says that the sun is moving and that the earth is fixed
and cannot be moved, then why would we not take that literally?

If you answer that it’s because scientists teach the heliocentric

model, then you're defending man's view, and that’s dangerous
territory, for we know that the enemy seeks to hide the Creator.

There's a bias by scientists to promote heliocentrism, as geocentrism

holds them accountable to a Creator. We can be sure that the enemy
has worked hard to hide the truth, for he seeks to steal glory away
from the Creator and to cause people to not believe in Him.
We need to be vigilant so that we don’t allow our preconceived
beliefs to cause us to miss what Scripture is declaring. We need to
let Scripture speak for itself, instead of injecting our beliefs onto it.
We need to look for the natural explanation that needs no excuses.

A principle known as Occam’s Razor, states that the preferred theory

is that that which has to make the fewest assumptions in explaining
all of the relevant evidence or data.

Applying that to Scripture, many assumptions have to be made to

justify the heliocentric model, and none have to be made for the
geocentric model.

“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to
be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.“
2 Timothy 2:15
 CHAPTER 6
The Genesis Account

Believers have been taught to trust the heliocentric explanations of

Copernicus, but it’s contrary to the Genesis creation narrative and
the timeline in which the universe was created.

It defies the power of the Creator of Scripture and makes the

creation narrative untenable. And it removes the earth and man
from their premier position.

The vast creation of the earth and all that’s on it and around it, are
described in thirty-one verses. We have to keep in mind that many
details were left out.

On the first day of creation, there was no sun, just the earth. If you
were building a universe, would you not start with the center and
build around it?

On the second day, our Heavenly Father created the expanse of

heaven, the firmament, the sphere of the sky, which surrounds the
earth. It’s declaring that the heavens encircle the earth, not the sun.

On the third day, the water on the earth was separated; some
placed above the earthly heavens, and some placed below the
earth’s mantle as the deep fountains; so that dry land appeared.

On the fourth day, the sun and moon were created to give light,
to rule, and to divide. Their functions are “for signs” “for seasons” “for
days” and “for years.” Scripture declares that the sun and moon are
in the earth-centered firmament, the expanse of the heavens.

Does Scripture say that the earth was put in motion around the
sun? No. Does it make any sense to create the earth first, then create
the sun, and then start the earth rotating around the sun? No.
The creation account of the heaven and the earth through the first four
days describes an earth-centered universe.

A literal and contextual interpretation of Genesis 1 proves that our

Creator designed an earth that’s surrounded by the three heavens:
the lower expanse in which the birds fly, and clouds exist; the
middle expanse in which the stars, sun, moon, and planets exist;
and the top expanse where our Creator resides.

If you insist that the creation narrative points to a heliocentric

universe, what in the Genesis account justifies that position?

Dr. Thomas M. Strouse in The Geocentric Cosmology said: “The Lord

revealed the three-fold purpose of the light bearers (vv. 17-18) with the
Hebrew conjugation of the Hiphil infinitive construct: to give light, to
rule, and to divide. The narrative repeats the purposes of the celestial
lights, all of which are for the benefit of the earth.

The earth needs physical enlightening, celestial governing, and temporal

dividing. Moses gives four functions for the temporal separation that the
celestial light bearers provide. Their functions are for signs, for seasons, for
days and for years. This movement initiated time, making the creation of
time earth-centric, and therefore all time “earth-time.”

There was no heaven, and consequently, the earth had no relationship with
the uncreated sun, moon or stars. God’s creation was exclusively
geocentric. The divine account of the creation of the heaven and earth
through the first four days teaches an exclusively geometric perspective.

This perspective is not phenomenological, because no one was standing on

the earth at the time, but it is absolute. The Lord God, outside of His
created heaven and earth, has spoken authoritatively about His creation of
a geocentric universe.

Never once does the Scripture state that the earth rotated relative to the
sun, moon, stars, or firmament. Never once does the Bible teach that the
earth was placed in the heavens to have motional interaction with the sun,
moon, or stars.”

In my study of Genesis 1, I noticed something really fascinating.

Read Genesis 1:1-4, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the
earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon
the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the
waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God
saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the
darkness.”

The sun wasn't created until the fourth day, so what was the "light"
that illuminated the earth on the first day? It's interesting that when
you read John 1:1-5, which points to Messiah, it's about the
beginning and light. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with
God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing
made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.”

Messiah declared that He’s the light of the world. "Then spake Jesus
again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me
shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life." John 8:12

The Apostle Paul said in 2 Corinthians 4:6, “For God, who commanded
the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the
light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.”

Messiah is the light of the world who has shined upon the earth from
the first day of creation. HalleluYah!
 CHAPTER 7
The Firmament

Genesis 1:6-8 says, “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst
of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made
the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament
from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God
called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the
second day.”

Genesis 1:8 gives us the definition of the word “firmament” =

“heaven.” Scripture never declares that the earth is in the heavens.
It is the expanse of the heavens which encircles the earth.

The KJ3 Literal Translation Bible uses the word “expanse” not
“firmament.” “And God said, Let an expanse be in the midst of the waters,
and let it be dividing between the waters and waters. And God made the
expanse, and He separated between the waters which were under the
expanse and the waters which were above the expanses. And it was so.
And God called the expanse, Heavens. And it was evening, and it was
morning, a second day.”

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines firmament: The region of the air; the
sky or heavens. The great arch or expanse over our heads, in which are
placed the atmosphere and the clouds, and in which the stars appear to be
placed, and are seen.

Easton's Bible Dictionary defines firmament: This word means simply

"expansion." It denotes the space or expanse like an arch appearing
immediately above us.

Naves Topical Index defines firmament: The expanse above the earth.

Smith's Bible Dictionary defines firmament: The word denotes an

expanse, a wide extent. The original, therefore, does not convey the sense of
solidity, but of stretching, extension; the great arch of expanse over our
heads, in which are placed the atmosphere and the clouds, and in which the
stars appear to be placed, and are really seen.

The firmament is the expanse of the heavens, which is centered on the

globe earth, not the sun; which had not been created yet.

Genesis 1:14-18 “And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of
the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and
for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the
firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And
God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser
light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the
firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, and to rule over the
day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God
saw that it was good.”

The sun and moon were placed in the second heaven which
surrounds the earth. Their functions are “for signs” “for seasons” “for
days” and “for years.”

Scripture declares that the sun and moon are in the earth-centered
expanse of heaven. It makes sense that both of those lights are
moving to declare these signs to those who are on the earth.

All of these verses show that the heavens (firmament) are stretched
out around the earth.

“Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of
the sea.” Job 9:8

“Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the
heavens like a curtain.” Psalms 104:2

“It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof
are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and
spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.” Isaiah 40:22
“Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched
them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he
that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk
therein.” Isaiah 42:5

“Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the
womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the
heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;” Isaiah 44:24

“I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have
stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.”
Isaiah 45:12

“The heavens” are the expanse where the host, the stars, were placed
during creation. The Hebrew word “shamayim” is describing the
sky, in which the stars dwell and clouds move

“Also, My hand hath founded earth, And My right hand stretched out the
heavens, I am calling unto them, they stand together.” Isaiah 48:13

“And forgettest the LORD thy maker, that hath stretched forth the
heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually
every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to
destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor?” Isaiah 51:13

“He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his
wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion.”
Jeremiah 10:12

“He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his
wisdom, and hath stretched out the heaven by his understanding.”
Jeremiah 51:15

“The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which
stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and
formeth the spirit of man within him.” Zechariah 12:1
The firmament is the expanse of heavens; which includes the sun,
moon, and stars. It is stretched out around the globe earth, which is
describing the geocentric model.

Nothing in Genesis points to the sun being the center of the

universe, and it never says that the earth is moving around the sun.
Scripture is earth-centered, with a sun that moves in a circuit
around it.

“But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness
arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth,
and grow up as calves of the stall.”
Malachi 4:2
 CHAPTER 8
The Three Levels Of Heaven

Amos 9:6 points to the elevations, the stories, the spheres, which
surround the globe earth.

“It is he that buildeth his stories in the heaven, and hath founded his troop
in the earth; he that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out
upon the face of the earth: The LORD is his name.”

The word “stories” is pointing to the elevation of heaven, once again

pointing to how the expanse of heaven, the firmament, is stretched out
around the earth.

The Septuagint, the Greek Old Testament, reads, “It is he that builds
up to the sky, and established his promise on earth; who calls the water of
the sea, and pours it out on the face of the earth; the Lord Almighty is his
name.”

The 1587 Geneva Bible reads, “He buildeth his spheres in the heauen,
and hath layde the foundation of his globe of elementes in the earth: hee
calleth the waters of the sea, and powreth them out vpon the open earth:
the Lorde is his Name.”

This image shows the “stories,” the spheres of heaven. Each sphere
serves a different purpose, to protect life on earth.
The Troposphere is the lowest part of the atmosphere which
contains our weather - clouds, rain, snow. The Stratosphere
contains much of the ozone which protects us.

“And God calleth to the expanse `Heavens.'” Genesis 1:8

The Hebrew word for heavens is 8064 shamayim. It points to two

levels of heaven, the visible arch in which the clouds move, as well
as the higher ether where the celestial bodies are located.

Easton's Bible Dictionary defines heaven as: The usual Hebrew word
for "heavens" is shamayim, a plural form meaning "heights, "elevations."

Smith's Bible Dictionary defines heaven as: This (shamayim) is the

word used in the expression "the heaven and the earth," or "the upper and
lower regions."

The Hebrew word for firmament is 7549 raqiy from 7554; which
means properly, an expanse, i.e., the firmament or (apparently) visible
arch of the sky.

The heavenly sky is not just empty space; it has ether; it has
substance; which is what Sir Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, and
others; describe in the expanse around the globe earth.

The birds and clouds are in the first level; the sun, moon, and stars,
are in the second level; all of which is centered around the earth.

J.A. Moorman in The Biblical Case For Geocricity comments,

“Regarding the upper parts, recent discoveries have demonstrated the
existence of galactic and other types of astronomical “shells” around the
earth. This appears to lead inescapably to the conclusion that the earth is at
the center!”

Astrophysicist J.I. Katz declared, “The distribution of gamma-ray burst

sources in space is a sphere or spherical shell with us at the center.” (1)
 CHAPTER 9
The Sun Is Moving

There are many verses which proclaim that the sun rises and sets.
They use words such as; arise, raiseth, arose, down, go down, going
down, gone down, riseth, risen, riseth not, rising, rose, sunrising, up,
went down. All of those are action words, describing the movement
of the sun.

On the heliocentric model, the sun doesn’t physically rise and set,
so people who hold that view say that it’s speaking about our
perspective, our viewpoint.

But the Hebrew words for “risen,” “went down,” and “going down,”
point to the action of the sun.

The Hebrew word yatsa' describes an action.

The Strong's Hebrew word for “risen” is 3318 yatsa'; which means:
to go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications, appear,
bear out, break out, bring forth (out, up), carry out, come (abroad, out,
thereat, without), + be condemned, depart, draw forth, in the end, escape,
exact, fail, fall (out), fetch forth (out), get away (forth, hence, out), (able to,
cause to, let) go abroad (forth, on, out), going out, grow, have forth (out),
issue out, lay (lie) out, lead out, pluck out, proceed, pull out, put away, be
risen, send with commandment, shoot forth, spread, spring out, stand out,
still, take forth (out), at any time, to (and fro), utter.

It’s used 992 times to describe the action of something.

“And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was
parted, and became into four heads.” Genesis 2:10

“And he sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, until the waters
were dried up from off the earth.” Genesis 8:7
“And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he
was the priest of the most high God.” Genesis 14:18

“And Jacob went out from Beersheba, and went toward Haran.”
Genesis 28:10

Here’s some examples of it being applied to the sun.

“The sun was risen upon the earth when Lot entered into Zoar.”
Genesis 19:23

“So let all thine enemies perish, O LORD: but let them that love him be as
the sun when he goeth forth in his might. And the land had rest forty
years.” Judges 5:31

The Hebrew word bow' describes an action.

The Strong's Hebrew word for "going down" is 935 bow'; which
means: to go or come:—abide, apply, attain, be, befall, besiege, bring, call,
carry, certainly, to come, depart, doubtless again, enter, be fallen, fetch,
follow, get, give, go, grant, have, indeed, (in-)vade, lead, lift, mention, pull
in, put, resort, run (down), send, set, stricken , surely, take (in), way.

It’s used 2307 times to describe the action of something.

“And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of
the ground an offering unto the LORD.” Genesis 4:3

“But with thee will I establish my covenant; and thou shalt come into the
ark, thou, and thy sons, and thy wife, and thy sons' wives with thee.”
Genesis 6:18

“And it came to pass, that, when Abram was come into Egypt, the
Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.” Genesis 12:14

“But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them,
and shut to the door.” Genesis 19:10

“And Isaac came from the way of the well Lahairoi; for he dwelt in the
south country.” Genesis 24:62
“And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah's tent, and took Rebekah,
and she became his wife; and he loved her: and Isaac was comforted after
his mother's death.” Genesis 24:67

Here’s some examples of it being applied to the sun.

“And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and,
lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him.” Genesis 15:12

“And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark,
behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between those
pieces.” Genesis 15:17

“And he lighted upon a certain place, and tarried there all night, because
the sun was set; and he took of the stones of that place, and put them for
his pillows, and lay down in that place to sleep.” Genesis 28:11

The Hebrew word mabow' describes an action.

The Hebrew word for “going down” is 3996 mabow'; which means:
an entrance (the place or the act); specifically sunset or the west; also
towards:—by which came, as cometh, in coming, as men enter into,
entering, entrance into, entry, where goeth, going down, + westward.

It’s used in these verses to describe an action:

“And they laid hands on her; and she went by the way by the which the
horses came into the king's house: and there was she slain.” 2 Kings 11:16

“Thou knowest Abner the son of Ner, that he came to deceive thee, and to
know thy going out and thy coming in, and to know all that thou doest.”
2 Samuel 3:25

“She crieth at the gates, at the entry of the city, at the coming in at the
doors.” Proverbs 8:3

Here are some examples of it being applied to the sun.

“The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth from
the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.” Psalms 50:1
“From the rising of the sun unto the going down of the same the LORD'S
name is to be praised.” Psalms 113:3

“For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my
name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be
offered unto my name, and a pure offering: for my name shall be great
among the heathen, saith the LORD of hosts.” Malachi 1:11

The Greek word anatello describes an action.

The Strong's Greek word for “rise” is 393 anatello; which means: to
(cause to) arise:—(a-, make to) rise, at the rising of, spring (up), be up.

Luke 12:54 points to clouds rising, “And he said also to the people,
When ye see a cloud rise out of the west, straightway ye say, There cometh
a shower; and so it is.”

Hebrews 7:14 “For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah; of
which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.”

Matthew 5:45 describes the action of the rain and the sun.

“That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he

maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the
just and on the unjust.”

One has to make excuses to say that one part is talking about our
perspective, and the other part is literal. The verbs “to rise” and
“sendeth” are describing the action of the sun and rain, respectively.
There is no conflict with the geocentric model.

James 1:11 points to the sun rising, “For the sun is no sooner risen with
a burning heat, but it withereth the grass, and the flower thereof falleth,
and the grace of the fashion of it perisheth: so also shall the rich man fade
away in his ways.”

The Greek word duno describes an action.

The Strong's Greek word for “did set” is duno; which means: (to sink)
to go "down":—set.

Mark 1:32 points to the sun sinking down below the horizon, “And
at even, when the sun did set, they brought unto him all that were
diseased, and them that were possessed with devils.“ Mark 1:32

So does Luke 4:40, “Now when the sun was setting, all they that had any
sick with divers diseases brought them unto him; and he laid his hands on
every one of them, and healed them.”

After seeing that the Hebrew and Greek words are describing the
action of the sun, we can see that it’s not referring to our
perspective. The literal explanation is congruent with the other
verses in this book, which describe a geocentric universe.

Read Job 38:12-20, and you notice that the context is about light.
The verses include the words: morning, dayspring, light is withheld,
shadow, where light dwelleth, and darkness; and it mentions “wicked
men” twice. It is declaring that the Earth is changed, that it’s
transformed, as the sun removes the darkness.

The context is the light hitting the earth, as Job 38:12 is talking
about the morning and dawn knowing its place. “Hast thou
commanded the morning since thy days, and caused the dayspring
to know his place.” As the sun rises and brings light on the earth, the
deeds of the wicked are exposed. “That it might take hold of the ends of
the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?” Job 38:13

Job 24:13-17 describes exactly that, “They are of those that rebel against
the light; they know not the ways thereof, nor abide in the paths thereof.
The murderer rising with the light killeth the poor and needy, and in the
night is as a thief. The eye also of the adulterer waiteth for the twilight,
saying, No eye shall see me: and disguiseth his face. In the dark they dig
through houses, which they had marked for themselves in the daytime: they
know not the light. For the morning is to them even as the shadow
of death: if one know them, they are in the terrors of the shadow of death.”
Job 38:12-14 describes the sun moving around the earth, bringing
light to give life to the earth, and exposing the deeds of evil men.

“Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; and caused the
dayspring to know his place; That it might take hold of the ends of the
earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it? It is turned as clay to the
seal; and they stand as a garment.”

The Hebrew word for morning is 1242 boqer; which means: dawn (as
the break of day); generally, morning:—(+) day, early, morning, morrow.

The Hebrew word for dayspring is 7837 shachar; which means: dawn
(literal, figurative or adverbial):—day(-spring), early, light, morning,
whence riseth.

It’s saying that the sun knows the place to rise each day to
illuminate the earth, in its seasonal patterns.

Psalms 50:1 points to the sun rising and going down, which is not
about our perspective.

“The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth from
the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.”

The KJ3 Literal Translation Bible, reads, “The God of gods--Jehovah--

hath spoken, And He calleth to the earth From the rising of the sun unto
its going in.”

The sun is going in, meaning it’s making its entrance into the section
of its circular path which hides it rays from part of the globe earth,
to bring in the nighttime when the moon and stars rule the sky.

Psalm 104:19 points to the movement of the moon and sun.

“He appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth his going down.”

The moon is moving and changing, to declare the seasons. To

proclaim that the sun is only symbolically going down, doesn’t
match the narrative. It’s speaking from the sun’s perspective that it
knows his going down.

Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “To speak of this as poetic language ignores the fact that the first half
of the verse is clearly not poetic. Both the sun and the moon exactly
observe the appointments of their Creator.”

“An impossible concept to reconcile with heliocentricity! How could the

sun know its going down if it is not going down? If it is motionless? If the
earth is turning beneath the sun? To speak of this as poetic language
ignores the fact that the first half of the verse is clearly not poetic. Both the
moon and the sun observe exactly the appointments of their Creator.”

Scripture doesn’t fit with the heliocentric globe earth model, as the
sun is not moving. The only model in which the sun is moving, and
it physically rises and sets; is the geocentric globe earth model.

We must believe Scripture over man’s teachings, especially since

we know that Satan seeks to deceive people and steal glory away
from our Heavenly Father.
 CHAPTER 10
The Circuit Of The Sun

In Psalms 19:1-6, King David describes the sun traveling in a circuit,

through the constellations, proclaiming the Gospel. “The heavens
declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Day
unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. There
is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard. Their line is gone
out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them
hath he set a tabernacle for the sun, which is as a bridegroom coming out of
his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. His going forth is
from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is
nothing hid from the heat thereof.”

The verbs about the sun describe its movement: “comes out,”.“to
run,” “his race,” and “goes forth” through its complete “circuit.” One
has to make excuses to say that Psalms 19:1-6 does not mean that
the sun is running its path in the circuit of heaven.

The Hebrew word for “coming out” is H3318 yatsa'; which means: to
go (causatively, bring) out, in a great variety of applications. It can be
rendered as these action words: bring forth, brought forth, brought out,
come forth, cometh forth, departed, go forth, go out, proceedeth, went out,
went forth.

An example of the action of yatsa' is Genesis 8:18, “And Noah went

forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him.”

Another example it pointing to the action of the sun is in Genesis

19:23, “The sun was risen upon the earth when Lot entered into Zoar.”

The Hebrew word for “going forth” is 4161 mowtsa'; which means: a
going forth, i.e. (the act) an egress, or (the place) an exit; hence, a source or
product; specifically, dawn, the rising of the sun (the East), exportation,
utterance, a gate, a fountain, a mine, a meadow (as producing grass):—
brought out, bud, that which came out, east, going forth, goings out, that
which (thing that) is gone out, outgoing, proceeded out, spring, vein,
(water-)course (springs).

An example of the action of mowtsa' is Numbers 33:2, “And Moses

wrote their goings out according to their journeys by the commandment of
the LORD: and these are their journeys according to their goings out.”

The Hebrew word for “circuit” is tquphah; which means: a revolution,

i.e. (of the sun) course, (of time) lapse:—circuit, come about, end.

We can see that our Heavenly Father is referring to the circle of the
mazzaroth, which acts as a constant witness to those on earth, about
His great power, and His redemption plan. This is the same circle
that is described in Isaiah 40:22, which is not pointing to the earth
itself, but to the ecliptic circle which surrounds the globe earth.

Psalms 19:1-6 describes a geocentric universe, as the sun is going

forth and running a race through the constellations on the circuit of
the ecliptic line which surrounds the globe earth.

Matthew Poole's Commentary on the Holy Bible (1683) says,

A tabernacle; which is a movable habitation, and therefore fitly applied to
the sun, which is here described to be in constant and perpetual motion.

E.W. Bullinger's Companion Bible says, tabernacle = tent, or house.

Hence the signs of the Zodiac are called the "houses" of the sun, because in
them he moves and dwells, and completes his circuit. This corresponds
with God's servants dwelling and moving in the written "Word."

Ecclesiastes 1:5-7 describes three things which move continually

relative to the earth: the sun, the wind, and the rivers.

“The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place
where he arose. The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto
the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again
according to his circuits. All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not
full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return
again.”

The verbs about the sun declare action, movement: “riseth,” “goeth
down,” “hasteneth,” and “arose.” The verbs about the wind declare
movement: “goeth,” “turneth about,” and “returneth.” The waters
have a continual flow upon the earth.

Giving a selective argument, that only the wind and water move
relative to the earth, but that the sun does not, is faulty
hermeneutics.

There’s no reason to believe that Ecclesiastes 1:5 is speaking

symbolically, as the passages around it are literal. Ecclesiastes 1:7,
describes the water cycle of evaporation and precipitation. “All the
rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence
the rivers come, thither they return again.”

If the sun isn’t moving, then that doesn’t match the description of
the wind and rivers, which are moving. Instead, it’s easy to see that
the passage is declaring that the sun, wind, and rivers, are all
moving.

The sun rises on the eastern horizon, it runs its course across the
sky during the day, it continues its circuit on the other side of the
earth to allow nighttime, and it returns on the eastern horizon the
next morning.
Dr. Jack Moorman in The Biblical Case For Geocentricity comments:
“As the wind and rivers move relative to the earth, this passage declares
that the sun does likewise. Only one, not two, hermeneutical principles
can be allowed in this brief comparison. Actuality is not mingled here with
the language of appearance. The sixteen words of motion in this passage
are all actual.”

Dr. Thomas M. Strouse in The Geocentric Cosmology notes: “Solomon

lists three objects that move continually relative to the earth: the sun, the
wind, and the rivers. Hermeneutically, it would be difficult if not
impossible to interpret these verses to teach that the earth moves relative to
the sun but is stationary relative to the wind and rivers. Alternatively,
would one want to interpret the passages as saying that the earth moves
relative to the sun, wind and rivers?”

Here’s some verses from the Apocrypha which describe a sun

that’s moving.

Just because these books aren’t included in the official canon of

books, doesn’t mean that they don’t have value.

1 Esdras 4:34 points to the course of the sun, which circles the
heavens. “O ye men, are not women strong? great is the earth, high is the
heaven, swift is the sun in his course, for he compasseth the heavens round
about, and fetcheth his course again to his own place in one day.”

Psalms of Solomon 18:11-14 points to the path of the sun. “Great is

our God and glorious, dwelling in the highest. (It is He) who hath
established in (their) courses the lights (of heaven) for determining seasons
from year to year, and they have not turned aside from the way which He
appointed them in the fear of God (they pursue) their path every day, from
the day God created them and for evermore. And they have erred not since
the day He created them. Since the generations of old they have not
withdrawn from their path, unless God commanded them (so to do) by the
command of His servants.”
Jasher 68:15 points to the circuit of the sun. “And God sent forth at
that time a terrible heat in the land of Egypt, which burned up the flesh of
man like the sun in his circuit, and it greatly oppressed the Egyptians.”

2 Enoch 12:2 is interesting, as it points to the sun going under the

earth. “Thus (the sun) revolves and goes, and rises under the heaven, and
its course goes under the earth with the light of its rays incessantly.”

Sirach 43:2 says that the sun goes forth. “The sun, when it appears,
making proclamation as it goes forth, is a marvelous instrument, the work
of the Most High.”

Sirach 43:5 points to the sun’s course. “Great is the Lord who made it;
and at his command it hastens on its course.”

We can see that the Scripture is declaring that the sun is moving in
a circuit, which only happens with a geocentric universe.

Next, we’ll see how the sun was stopped on one day only, which
has never happened beforehand or afterward. This confirms that
it’s normally moving.

“The sun, moving as it does, sets up processes of change and becoming and
decay, and by its agency the finest and sweetest water is every day carried
up and is dissolved into vapour and rises to the upper region, where it is
condensed again by the cold and so returns to the earth. This, as we have
said before, is the regular course of nature.”
Aristotle
 CHAPTER 11
The Sun Was Stopped

The sun can only be stopped in a geocentric universe.

Joshua 10:12-14 “Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the
LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said
in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon,
in the valley of Ajalon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until
the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written
in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and
hasted not to go down about a whole day. And there was no day like that
before it or after it, that the LORD hearkened unto the voice of a man: for
the LORD fought for Israel.”

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible (1763) says: And the sun
stood still, and the moon stayed. The sun that came out of his chamber like
a bridegroom, and rejoiced as a strong man to run his course, stopped his
course at once; and the moon that walks in her brightness proceeded not
on, but both stood still, motionless, and continued in this position.

Joshua references the book of Jasher, which says: “And when they
were smiting, the day was declining toward evening, and Joshua said in
the sight of all the people, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon, and thou
moon in the valley of Ajalon, until the nation shall have revenged itself
upon its enemies. And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Joshua, and the
sun stood still in the midst of the heavens, and it stood still six and thirty
moments, and the moon also stood still and hastened not to go down a
whole day. And there was no day like that, before it or after it, that the
Lord hearkened to the voice of a man, for the Lord fought for Israel.”
Jasher 88:63-65
Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “In today’s cosmology, the sun is stationary with reference to the
earth and the moon is in motion, but here both are said to be moving, and
both are made to stand still. Therefore by this reasoning the statement that
the moon stayed is correct, but that the sun stood still is incorrect. How
can it stand still if it is not moving? How can there be truth and false hood
in two immediately parallel statements? Further, as heliocentrism requires
that the earth would have to cease its rotational movement; it is to be noted
that nothing in this account is said of the earth at all. Every statement
concerns the movement of the sun and moon. For the earth to suddenly or
even gradually stop its rotation, a further miracle would be required to
prevent it being overwhelmed by catastrophe.”

We know the moon rotates around the earth, so it’s implying that
the sun also rotates around the earth. To say that one body
normally moves and the other one doesn’t, when both of them are
commanded not to move, is bad hermeneutics. It declares that on
no other day, before or after it, has the sun stood still like this. How
can we not take Scripture at its word?

Habakkuk 3:11 reinforces that this was a special occasion when the
sun and moon were commanded not to move. “The sun and moon
stood still in their habitation: at the light of thine arrows they went, and at
the shining of thy glittering spear.”

Sirach 46:4 points to the sun being stopped. “Was not the sun held
back by his hand? And did not one day become as long as two?”

Job 9:7 points to the power of our Heavenly Father, that He can
command the sun to stop moving. “Which commandeth the sun, and it
riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.”

People who defend the heliocentric model have to make excuses

about the sun being stopped, but it fits perfectly with the geocentric
universe model.
 CHAPTER 12
The Sun Was Moved Back

The sun can’t be moved in a heliocentric universe, so these verses

about the sun being moved back, invalidate that model.

“And Hezekiah said unto Isaiah, What shall be the sign that the LORD
will heal me, and that I shall go up into the house of the LORD the third
day? And Isaiah said, This sign shalt thou have of the LORD, that the
LORD will do the thing that he hath spoken: shall the shadow go forward
ten degrees, or go back ten degrees? And Hezekiah answered, It is a light
thing for the shadow to go down ten degrees: nay, but let the shadow
return backward ten degrees. And Isaiah the prophet cried unto the
LORD: and he brought the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had
gone down in the dial of Ahaz.” 2 Kings 20:8-11

The context is that King Hezekiah is sick and near death. “In those
days was Hezekiah sick unto death. And the prophet Isaiah the son of
Amoz came to him, and said unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Set thine
house in order; for thou shalt die, and not live.” 2 Kings 20:1

But because of his repentance, a sign was given that his life would
be extended. “Turn again, and tell Hezekiah the captain of my people,
Thus saith the LORD, the God of David thy father, I have heard thy
prayer, I have seen thy tears: behold, I will heal thee: on the third day thou
shalt go up unto the house of the LORD. And I will add unto thy days
fifteen years; and I will deliver thee and this city out of the hand of the king
of Assyria; and I will defend this city for mine own sake, and for my
servant David's sake.” 2 Kings 20:5-6
2 Chronicles 32 records the same time when Hezekiah was sick.
“In those days Hezekiah was sick to the death, and prayed unto the LORD:
and he spake unto him, and he gave him a sign. But Hezekiah rendered not
again according to the benefit done unto him; for his heart was lifted up:
therefore there was wrath upon him, and upon Judah and Jerusalem.
Notwithstanding Hezekiah humbled himself for the pride of his heart, both
he and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, so that the wrath of the LORD came
not upon them in the days of Hezekiah.” 2 Chronicles 32:24-26

Isaiah 38 points to the same timeframe and it says that it is the sun
which was moved back ten degrees: “And this shall be a sign unto
thee from the LORD, that the LORD will do this thing that he hath
spoken; Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the degrees, which is gone
down in the sun dial of Ahaz, ten degrees backward. So the sun returned
ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down.” Isaiah 38:7-8

Albert Barnes' Notes on the Bible says: The phrase 'bring again'
(Hebrew, ‫ בישמ‬meshyb ) means to cause to return (Hiphil, from ‫ בוש‬shub,
to return); that is, I will cause it to retrograde, or bring back.

Ecclesiasticus 48:23 confirms that it was the sun which was moved.
“In his time the sun went backward, and he lengthened the king's life.”

If the earth was moved back to make this happen, then the text
would say that the earth was returned.

If the sun is the center of the universe, it’s not possible to move it so
that it causes the shadow on earth to move back ten degrees,
invalidating the heliocentric universe model.

This can only be explained with the geocentric universe, in which

the sun can be moved backward.
 CHAPTER 13
The Earth Is Fixed

Scripture declares that the earth is fixed, and it never says that it’s
revolving around the sun or rotating. Only during catastrophic
circumstances does it say that the earth can be moved, which is
contrary to the norm.

Job 9:6 points to earth’s “place.”

“Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.”
A revolving earth doesn’t have a set place.

The Hebrew word for “out of her place” is 4725 maqowm; which
means properly, a standing, i.e. a spot; but used widely of a locality
(general or specific); also (figuratively) of a condition (of body or mind):—
country, home, open, place, room, space, whither(-soever).

It’s pointing to a locality, a home, which is not pointing to a

continuous circuit. If Job was describing the earth traveling in a
circuit, he could have used the word chuwg; which means a circle,
circuit, compass; to say that the earth was moved out of its circuit.
But we never read of the earth having a circuit.

Psalms 33:9 “For he spake, and it was (done); he commanded, and

it stood fast.”

What’s the context? Psalms 33:6-8 says, “By the word of the Lord were
the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth. He
gathereth the waters of the sea together as an heap: he layeth up the depth
in storehouses. Let all the earth fear the Lord: let all the inhabitants of the
world stand in awe of him.”

A geocentric globe earth stands fast in the middle of the universe,

an earth which revolves around the sun does not.
Psalms 119:89-90 “For ever, O Lord, thy word is settled in heaven.
Thy faithfulness is unto all generations: thou hast established the
earth, and it abideth.”

The Strong's Hebrew word for “abideth” is 5975 `amad; which

means: to stand, in various relations (literal and figurative, intransitive
and transitive):—abide (behind), appoint, arise, cease, confirm, continue,
dwell, be employed, endure, establish, leave, make, ordain, be (over), place,
(be) present (self), raise up, remain, repair, + serve, set (forth, over, -tle,
up), (make to, make to be at a, with-)stand (by, fast, firm, still, up), (be at
a) stay (up), tarry.

These verses use the Hebrew word `amad to point to something that
is not moving.

“And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it
before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat.”
Genesis 18:8

“And Abraham gat up early in the morning to the place where he stood
before the LORD.” Genesis 19:27

“And they took ashes of the furnace, and stood before Pharaoh; and Moses
sprinkled it up toward heaven; and it became a boil breaking forth with
blains upon man, and upon beast.” Exodus 9:10

It’s proclaiming that just as the earth is stable and has not been
moved since creation, so too is our Heavenly Father’s faithfulness,
which has endured through all of the generations of men who have
lived on the earth.

Scripture is saying that the earth stands still in its place. Here are
some quotes from Robert Sungenis' documentary Journey to the
Center of the Universe, which describe a still earth.

Pliny the Elder said: “It [the earth] alone remains immoveable, whilst all
things revolve round it.” (1)
Physicist, I. Bernard Cohen, Professor of the history of science at
Harvard University, said: “There is no planetary observation by which
we on Earth can prove that the Earth is moving in an orbit around the
sun. Thus all Galileo's discoveries with the telescope can be accommodated
to the system invented by Tycho Brahe just before Galileo began his
observations of the heavens. In this Tychonic system, the planets...move in
orbits around the sun, while the sun moves in an orbit around the Earth in
a year. Furthermore, the daily rotation of the heavens is communicated to
the sun and planets, so that the Earth itself neither rotates nor revolves in
an orbit.” (2)

Physicist Julian B. Barbour said: "Three and a half centuries after

Galileo, it is still remarkably difficult to say categorically whether the earth
moves." "There is no planetary observation by which we on Earth can
prove that the Earth is moving in an orbit around the sun." (3)

Albert Einstein said: “While I was thinking of this problem in my

student years, I came to know the strange result of Michelson’s
experiment. Soon I came to the conclusion that our idea about the motion
of the Earth with respect to the ether is incorrect, if we admit Michelson’s
null result as a fact. This was the first path which led me to the special
theory of relativity. Since then I have come to believe that the motion of the
Earth cannot be detected by any optical experiment.” (4)

"...to the question whether or not the motion of the Earth in space can be
made perceptible in terrestrial experiments. We have already
remarked...that all attempts of this nature led to a negative result. Before
the theory of relativity was put forward, it was difficult to become
reconciled to this negative result." (5)

Lawrence Krauss said: “The new results are either telling us that all of
science is wrong and we’re the center of the universe, or maybe the data is
simply incorrect.” (6)
Physicist Wolfgang Pauli, a pioneer of quantum physics, pointed
out: “The failure of the many attempts to measure terrestrially any effects
of the earth’s motion.” (7)

Physicist Henri Poincaré said: “A great deal of research has been carried
out concerning the influence of the Earth’s movement. The results were
always negative.” (8)

Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “Therefore, except in the judgments of the last days, there appears to
be no passage in the Bible that indicates that the earth is in motion.”

F.E. Pasche (1915), in his book Fifty Reasons – Copernicus Or The

Bible, said: “One of the strong arguments advanced by Dr. Schoepffer in
his excellent book “The Earth Stands Fast” (Berlin, 1869) against the
rotation theory is that such a movement should produce both air-currents
and ocean-currents of a powerful and decided type, such as do not, in fact,
exist!”

Scripture says that the sun is moving in a circuit and that the earth
is fixed in place. Given that physicists say that the heliocentric and
Tychonic geocentric models are both valid, why do believers side
with the heliocentric view?

Since the false narrative of evolution is based on the heliocentric

model, why do people choose to believe it over the geocentric
model that Scripture is describing? Because men say so? Let it not
be so!
 CHAPTER 14
The Circle Of Isaiah 40:22

“It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the
inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the
heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.”

Heliocentrists proclaim that the “circle” is describing the globe

earth, but that misses the mark. A circle is a curved line, which has
no area - just as a straight line has no area.

The Strong’s Hebrew for the word “circle” is 2329 chuwg; which
means a circle:—circle, circuit, compass. The Strong’s Hebrew word
for “ball” is 1754, duwr; which means a circle, ball or pile:—ball, turn,
round about.

The word ball is used in Isaiah 22:18, “He will surely violently turn
and toss thee like a ball into a large country: there shalt thou die, and there
the chariots of thy glory shall be the shame of thy lord's house.”

Isaiah knows the difference between a ball and a circle, so if Isaiah is

describing the globe earth, then he would have used the word ball
(Strong’s Hebrew 1754, duwr), not circle (Strong’s Hebrew 2329,
chuwg).

But Isaiah didn’t use the word “ball” to describe a globe-shaped

earth; as he’s not describing the earth itself.

Isaiah 40:22 doesn’t say “circular earth,” it says “the circle of the
earth.” The circle is the focus, not the earth. Just like you would say
“the rings of Saturn” to point to the rings, not the planet; Isaiah is
pointing to the circle, not the earth. The context of the verse shows
that he’s pointing to the ecliptic circle in the expanse of the heavens,
which surrounds the globe earth.
Seeing this was an ‘aha!’ moment for me because it changes the
whole debate about this verse; as it’s pointing to the constellations
in the expanse of the heavens, which encircle the earth.

Isaiah 40:22 says, “It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth.” The
‘he’ is our Heavenly Father, who is not sitting upon the earth; so
right there, we can see that the circle is not describing the earth.

Isaiah 40:22 declares “and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers,”

which reveals that our Heavenly Father’s viewpoint makes people
look small, so we can see that He’s high above the earth; once again
proving that He’s not sitting on the earth.

The same Hebrew word (chuwg) is used in Job 22:14 to describe the
circuit of heaven, which also proves that our Heavenly Father walks
on the circle of heaven, not on the earth. “Thick clouds are a covering to
him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit of heaven.”

In the context of talking about the circle, Isaiah 40:22 describes the
stars, not the earth; “that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and
spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.”

He’s saying that the circle is stretched out like a curtain, like a tent,
which surrounds the globe earth. Above and below the twelve
primary constellations on the ecliptic circle are thirty-six decan
constellations, which form a spherical tabernacle of stars, in which
our Heavenly Father dwells.

The word for “tent” is 168 'ohel; which means: a tent:—covering,

(dwelling)(place), home, tabernacle.

Our Heavenly Father’s home is above the tabernacle of stars which

surrounds the globe earth as a curtain. The forty-eight constellations
of the mazzaroth which are based around the ecliptic circle, have
proclaimed His plan of redemption from the beginning. They
witness to us every night.
The context of Isaiah 40:22 is the circle of stars in heaven, not the
earth. Our Heavenly Father is pointing to the Gospel in the Stars,
which the enemy has perverted with explanations of pagan gods.

Here are brief explanations of the twelve primary constellations:

Virgo represents the seed of the woman, Messiah the Incarnate Son.
Libra represents the required price, Messiah the Redeemer.…….…....
Scorpio represents the mortal conflict, Messiah the Sufferer.….…...
Sagittarius represents the final triumph, Messiah the Conqueror.

Capricorn represents life out of death, Messiah the Sacrifice. ……..

Aquarius represents blessing out of victory, Messiah the Living Water.
Pisces represents deliverance out of bondage, Messiah the Liberator.
Aries represents glory out of humiliation, Messiah the Crowned Lamb.

Taurus represents His glorious coming, Messiah the Judge.………..

Gemini represents His rule on Earth, Messiah the King.…….………
Cancer represents His possessions held secure, Messiah the Protector.
Leo represents His enemies destroyed, Messiah the Victor. …………
HalleluYah!

Zodiac comes from the Greek zodiakos, which means ‘a circle.’

I’m not talking about the false teaching of astrology horoscopes that
are based on the zodiac, but theology which is proclaimed by it.

Job understood that the constellations told the story of his

redemption, and he mentioned them by name. “Which maketh
Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south.” Job 9:9

“Canst thou fasten the bands of the Pleiades, or loosen the cords of Orion?
Dost thou bring forth the constellations each in its season? Or dost thou
guide the Bear with her sons? Knowest thou the ordinances of the
heavens? dost thou determine their rule over the earth?” Job 38:31-33
Amos 5:8 points to the constellation Orion, “Seek him that maketh the
seven stars and Orion, and turneth the shadow of death into the morning,
and maketh the day dark with night: that calleth for the waters of the sea,
and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: The LORD is his name.”

Each of the twelve signs pictorially represents a prophetic event

about the story of salvation. There are three decan constellations for
each of the twelve primary ones, so there’s forty-eight total.

An example is Orion, which is a decan of Taurus the bull. It means

Coming As Light, and since creation, it has foretold a mighty person
who is to come to earth, who triumphs over the great enemy of
mankind, who takes away sin and its disastrous effects, and who
brings in blessing and righteousness. It points to our Messiah.

In the book of Revelation, Messiah proclaimed to be the Alpha and

Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. Alpha and
Omega are the first and last letters of the Greek alphabet.

The beginning constellation of Virgo points to Messiah’s birth by the

virgin Mary. The ending constellation of Leo points to Messiah’s
return as the conquering Lion of the tribe of Judah.

In the Hebrew language, the first and last letters are the Aleph and
Tav. The Hebrew language uses symbols as well, and the symbol
for the letter Aleph is the head of a bull/ox, which points to a strong
leader. The symbol for the letter Tav is the cross, which points to a
mark, a sign, and a covenant. Messiah ratified the everlasting covenant
with His blood as the Passover Lamb, to atone for our sins.

Are you seeing how the symbols of the constellations match the
symbols of the Hebrew language and are pointing to the promised
Messiah? Our mighty leader came to defeat the enemy by His
sacrifice on the cross, which ratified the everlasting covenant with
His blood. HalleluYah!
Let’s back up to get the context of Isaiah 40:22. Our Heavenly
Father is declaring the glory of His creation. “To whom then will ye
liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him? The workman
melteth a graven image, and the goldsmith spreadeth it over with gold, and
casteth silver chains.” Isaiah 40:18-19

He’s pointing to the circle of stars, which have declared the Gospel
message from creation. “Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it
not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the
foundations of the earth?” Isaiah 40:21

He tells Isaiah to look up to the circle of the stars (host) of the

mazzaroth. “Lift up your eyes on high, and behold who hath created these
things, that bringeth out their host by number: he calleth them all by
names by the greatness of his might, for that he is strong in power; not one
faileth.” Isaiah 40:26

Here are a few examples of the stars being named, all of which
point to Messiah: Spica means the Branch. Arcturus means He comes.
Pollux means who comes to suffer. Antares means the wounded. Sirius
means the Prince. Elnath means slain. Procyon means the Redeemer.
Vega means He shall be exalted. Regulus means regal, the King Star.
HalleluYah!

The non-canonical Book of Wisdom (aka the Wisdom of Solomon)

points to the circle of stars. “But deemed either fire, or wind, or the swift
air, or the circle of the stars, or the violent water, or the lights of heaven, to
be the gods which govern the world.” Wisdom of Solomon 13:2

2 Enoch 21:7-8 points to the twelve constellations of the circle of the

expanse of heaven. “And I saw the eighth heaven, which is called in the
Hebrew tongue Muzaloth, changer of the seasons, of drought, and of wet,
and of the twelve constellations of the circle of the firmament, which are
above the seventh heaven.
And I saw the ninth heaven, which is called in Hebrew Kuchavim, where
are the heavenly homes of the twelve constellations of the circle of the
firmament.”

With the understanding that Isaiah 40:22 is pointing to the ecliptic

circle, which has proclaimed the Gospel message since creation; let’s
look at Psalms 19:1-6 with fresh eyes.

“The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his
handywork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth
knowledge. There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.
Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of
the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun, Which is as a
bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to
run a race. His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit
unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.”

Messiah, the Sun of Righteousness (Malachi 4:2), is symbolized by the

sun, which moves in a circuit through the twelve constellations
every year, to proclaim the Gospel message. How glorious is that?

Satan perverted the story of the constellations to make them about

pagan gods, which causes people to worship many false gods,
including the pagan sun and moon gods. And sadly, Satan has
done a great job at covering over the truth of the constellations, by
causing Pastors and believers to dismiss all study of the stars.

Our Heavenly Father’s home is in the tabernacle of stars which

surrounds the globe earth as a curtain. Every night they declare the
Gospel story of Messiah overcoming the enemy and redeeming the
set-apart saints. Every year the sun runs its course through the
circuit, to proclaim the redemption story. HalleluYah!
 CHAPTER 15
The Canopy Of Stars

Job 26:7 points to the firmament being stretched out as a spherical

ball that surrounds the globe earth.

“He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth
upon nothing.”

We can see that the “circle” is the ecliptic circle that surrounds the
globe earth. Twelve primary constellations are located on the
ecliptic circle, and the globe earth is surrounded by a canopy of
stars, as thirty-six decan constellations fill the skies from the north
celestial pole to the south celestial pole.

What Job is proclaiming is “stretched out” is the whole celestial

sphere, which is like a curtain, or canopy, or tent, around the earth.
This is the tabernacle in which our Heavenly Father dwells.

Look at the cover of the book, and you see that the celestial sphere
of stars rotates around the north celestial pole star.

Below it is a vast empty space inside of the planisphere. In the

middle of that canopy of stars is the globe earth, the jewel of the
universe, which is hung upon nothing.

To this Matthew Henry remarks in his Whole Bible Commentary:

“The vast terraqueous globe neither rests upon any pillars, nor hangs
upon any axle-tree; and yet, by the almighty power of God, is firmly fixed
in its place, poised with its own weight. The art of man could not hang a
feather upon nothing, yet the Divine Wisdom hangs the whole earth so.”

It’s really interesting that Isaiah’s narrative of Lucifer’s fall also

includes the word “north.” “How art thou fallen from heaven, O
Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which
didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend
into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also
upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend
above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.”
Isaiah 14:12-14

The context of Isaiah 14 is about the Babylonian kingdom, which

Satan used to create the narrative of pagan god worship; of the sun
god Nimrod, the moon goddess Semiramis, and their supposed
incarnate christ child Tammuz. From this came the Egyptian sun
god Osiris, moon goddess Isis, and their supposed incarnate christ
child Horus.

Satan used the Babylonian kingdom to deceive the nations into

pagan god worship and into building a tower which would reach to
the heavens. Satan desires to steal glory from the Heavenly Father,
and to exalt his throne above the earth; to be like the most High and
have his throne above the North Star where the Heavenly Father’s
throne resides.

Read the book The Witness of the Stars by E.W. Bullinger, and you
see that the constellation of Cephus is at the top of the circle, near
the north celestial pole star.

In the constellation of Cephus, we see the glorious, crowned,

enthroned king (our Messiah) in the highest heaven. He has a
scepter in his hand and his foot planted on the north celestial pole
star. HalleluYah!
Hebrews 1:8 says, “But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for
ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.”

Also near the north celestial pole star is the constellation of Draco,
the dragon, Satan, the enemy of Messiah. We just read how Satan
sought to take the throne of heaven. Are your eyes opening up?
There’s a lot more represented in the stars than we’ve been taught.

The enemy has perverted the narrative of the constellations to make

them about pagan gods, astrology, and fortune-telling; but the
astronomy of the stars was created by our Heavenly Father in the
beginning to foretell the battle between good and evil, and to
proclaim the redemption of the set-apart saints.

Cephus means the one cometh to rule, the branch, the king. Jeremiah
23:5 says, "Behold, the days are coming," declares the LORD, "When I
will raise up for David a righteous Branch; And He will reign as king and
act wisely And do justice and righteousness in the land.”

Other verses that point to Messiah as the “branch” are Isaiah 4:2,
Isaiah 11:1-5, Jeremiah 33:15-16, Zechariah 3:8, and Zechariah 6:12-
13. HalleluYah!
Luke 19:38 points to Messiah as the King, “Saying, blessed be the King
that cometh in the name of the Lord: peace in heaven, and glory in the
highest.”

Many other verses point to Messiah as King, but I can’t leave out
John 18:37, “Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus
answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for
this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth.
Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.” HalleluYah!

The brightest star in the constellation of Cephus is called

Al Deramin, which means come quickly. The next brightest is Al Phirk,
which means the Redeemer.

The next brightest is called Al Rai, which means who bruises or

breaks. All of the stars describe our beloved Messiah and His role in
our redemption. Psalms 147:4 says, “He appoints the number of the
stars, He gives names to all of them.”

Keeping the constellation of Cephus in mind, which represents

Messiah sitting on a throne with His foot on the north celestial pole
star, which is on top of the whole celestial sphere being as a
footstool under His foot; read Hebrews 1:10-13.

“And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth;
and the heavens are the works of thine hands: They shall perish; but thou
remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment; And as a vesture
shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the same,
and thy years shall not fail. But to which of the angels said he at any time,
Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?”

The demise of Lucifer is depicted in a key way with the

astronomical mechanism known as the precession of the poles. Alpha
Draconis (Thuban), the brightest star in Draco the dragon, was the
original pole star.
But due to the precession of the poles, the pole star has moved from
Draco and now resides near Polaris / Al Ruccaba of Ursa Minor. (1)

Al Ruccaba means the turned or ridden on. The North Polar star is
now under Messiah’s feet, for His death and resurrection defeated
the enemy. Ephesians 1:20-23 points to Messiah being given
authority, as Satan had it on earth beforehand.

“Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set
him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, Far above all
principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is
named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And hath
put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to
the church, Which is his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.”

Messiah is represented in Cephus and Satan is represented in

Draco, but what about Ursa Minor which has the North Polar Star
at the end of its tail? Ursa Minor is called the Little Bear, or the Lesser
Bear. That name is a deception to hide what it means, as it’s
pointing to the saints, the Lesser Fold, the little flock of sheep.
These are those who have been ‘partakers of the heavenly calling’
to overcome the enemy.

John 10:14-16 points to this lesser fold, “I am the good shepherd, and
know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even
so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep
I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall
hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.”

Who does Satan, Draco, war against? The saints, Messiah’s fold of
sheep. “And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great
red dragon (Draco), having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns
upon his heads. And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and
did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which
was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod
of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.”
Revelation 12:3-5

“And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with
the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have
the testimony of Jesus Christ.” Revelation 12:17

Alpha in the constellation of Draco was the North Polar star when
the zodiac was first formed, which represented Satan’s authority on
earth. But the pole star is now Alpha in the constellation that
represents the little fold, Messiah’s saints, who have the authority to
overcome the dragon by the power of their Messiah. HalleluYah!

Revelation 12:11 proclaims the victory of the saints over the

Dragon. “And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the
word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.”

The whole celestial sphere rotates around the north celestial pole
star to tell the story of our redemption. Are you seeing how the
enemy has hidden this story by creating pagan imagery? Are you
seeing that the story is written in the whole celestial sphere, which
revolves around the earth?

Sadly, Pastors have been misled about astronomy, condemning it

with a false association to astrology. People have understood the
planisphere of stars for many thousands of years. Job clearly
understood the stars and their meaning.

“For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly
seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal
power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.”
Romans 1:20
 CHAPTER 16
The Father’s Throne

Scripture defines three levels of heaven: the lower level where birds
fly, and clouds store water and nourish the earth; the second level
where the sun, moon, and stars, exist; and the third level where the
Heavenly Father dwells.

Deuteronomy 4:32 points to the “sides” of the heavenly expanse,

pointing to its finite nature, “For ask now of the days that are past,
which were before thee, since the day that God created man upon the earth,
and ask from the one side of heaven unto the other, whether there hath been
any such thing as this great thing is, or hath been heard like it?”

These verses show that the third heaven is above the second level of
heaven.

“O Lord our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth! who hast set
thy glory above the heavens.” Psalms 8:1

“Be thou exalted, O God, above the heavens; let thy glory be above all the
earth.” Psalms 57:5

“He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens,
that he might fill all things.” Ephesians 4:10

Based on that, does it seem like the second level, which includes the
sun, moon, and stars; is ever-expanding like modern science tells
us? Do we think that the third heaven where our Heavenly Father
exists, keeps moving further away from us?

Joshua 2:11 proclaims that the earth is below the heaven where our
Heavenly Father resides. “And as soon as we had heard these things,
our hearts did melt, neither did there remain any more courage in any
man, because of you: for the Lord your God, he is God in heaven above,
and in earth beneath.”

Isaiah 66:1 says that the earth is the footstool under the throne of
our Heavenly Father. “Thus saith the Lord, The heaven is my throne,
and the earth is my footstool: where is the house that ye build unto me?
and where is the place of my rest?”

Psalms 102:19 says the He looks from His sanctuary, down to the
earth. “For he hath looked down from the height of his sanctuary; from
heaven did the Lord behold the earth;”

Psalms 103:11 says that the heaven of our Heavenly Father is above
the earth. “For as the heaven is high above the earth, so great is his mercy
toward them that fear him.”

Matthew 5:34-35 says, “But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by
heaven; for it is God's throne: Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool:
neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.”

Acts 7:49 says, “Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what

house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest?”

On the heliocentric model, the earth reportedly flies through space

at 66,600 MPH as it orbits the sun. The sun and all the planets in the
solar system are spinning around the center of the Milky Way,
while at the same time moving upwards relative to the Milky Way
plane, which means that we’re reportedly moving through the
galaxy at approximately 541,700 MPH.

And that's not even counting the fact that our Milky Way is also
zooming through the universe.

Do we imagine that our Heavenly Father’s throne is also flying

through space to stay above the earth? Doesn’t it make more sense
that the earth is still in the universe and not speeding through space
and that our Heavenly Father’s throne resides above it?
Dr. Jack Moorman, in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “This is incongruous if earth is in multi-directional motion.”

Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D, in his book Geocentricity: Christianity In

The Woodshed, said, “We maintain that the Bible teaches us of an earth
that neither rotates daily nor revolves yearly around the sun; that it is at
rest with respect to the throne of Him who called it into existence and that
hence it is absolutely at rest in the universe.”

A geocentric, non-moving earth is a more logical fit, and you’ll see

in an upcoming chapter that scientific experiments which were
designed to prove that the earth is moving, actually proved the
very opposite.

Scripture describes a still earth, with the throne of the Heavenly

Father above it. Why do people believe scientists, who proclaim
that the earth is hurtling through space?

”Praise ye him, sun and moon: praise him, all ye stars of light.
Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, and ye waters that be above the
heavens. Let them praise the name of the LORD: for he commanded,
and they were created. He hath also stablished them for ever and ever:
he hath made a decree which shall not pass.”
Psalms 148:3-6
 CHAPTER 17
The Gospel In The Stars

Job knew the redemption story through the stars.

Job is considered to be the oldest written book, so how did Job

understand that a Redeemer would come? Job 19:25-27 says,
“For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter
day upon the earth: And though after my skin worms destroy this body,
yet in my flesh shall I see God: Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes
shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.”

Five constellations are referred to by name in the book of Job:

Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades in Job 9:9; Pleiades, Orion and the Bear
with her sons in Job 38:31-33; the crooked serpent (Hydra) in Job 26:13;
and the whole zodiac circle of constellations, the Mazzaroth, with its
succession of signs and seasons, is spoken of in Job 38:32.

At an early age of human existence, our Creator led His set-apart

people in understanding the names and groupings of the stars; to
show them the Gospel message, which is proclaimed in the expanse
of the heavens. They’ve been in the star-charts of cultures for
thousands of years.
Here’s a summary of the redemption story that’s told in the stars.

E.W. Bullinger, in his book The Witness of the Stars, said: “These
pictures were designed to preserve, expound, and perpetuate the one first
great promise, that all hope for Man, all hope for Creation, was bound up
in a coming Redeemer; One who should be born of a woman; who should
first suffer, and afterwards gloriously triumph; One who should first be
wounded by that great enemy who was the cause of all sin and sorrow and
death, but who should finally crush the head of "that Old Serpent the
Devil."

Ken Fleming, in his book God’s Voice in the Stars, said: “In the first
four signs Christ is portrayed as the Suffering Savior delivering man from
the penalty of sin. In the middle four signs Christ is portrayed as the
Glorified Blesser delivering man from the power of sin. In the remaining
four signs Christ is portrayed as the Reigning Judge delivering man from
the presence of sin.”

The sign Virgo represents the Promised Seed of the woman,

Messiah the incarnate Son.

The three decan constellations of Virgo are Coma, which points to a

woman with her child, and that He should be the "Desire of all
nations." Centaurus, which has two natures, holding a spear
piercing a victim, Messiah the despised sin offering. And Bootes,
which points to a man walking bearing a branch called Arcturus,
meaning “He cometh.”

“Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall
conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.” Isaiah 7:14

The decan constellation Coma represents a woman with a child on

her lap, pointing to Mary, the mother of Messiah. This has been
perverted by the enemy to point to the pagan goddesses of
Semiramis of Babylon, Isis of Egypt, etc.
The enemy hid this truth by causing astronomers to rename Coma
with the name ‘Berenices Hair,’ after Berenice II of Egypt who
sacrificed her long hair as a votive offering.

The sign Libra represents the justice and judgment of our sins,
paid with a price by the blood of Messiah our Redeemer.

The three decan constellations of Libra are Crux, which represents

the mark of the Hebrew Tav symbol, the cross of Messiah endured.
Lupus, which represents the victim slain, Messiah’s sacrifice for our
sin. And Corona, which represents the crown which is bestowed
upon our Messiah.

“Just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give
His life a ransom for many.” Matthew 20:28
The sign Scorpio represents the enemy seeking to wound
Messiah, but itself trodden underfoot.

The three decan constellations of Scorpio are Serpens, which means

the serpent struggling with the man, Messiah. Ophiuchus, which
means the struggle with the enemy. And Hercules, which points to
a man kneeling on one knee, humbled in the conflict, but victorious,
our mighty Messiah.

“Thou shalt tread upon the lion and adder: the young lion and the dragon
shalt thou trample under feet.” Psalms 91:13

The sign Sagittarius represents the archer, going forth to conquer.

The three decans of Sagittarius are Lyra, which represents the

praise for the victorious conqueror, Messiah. Ara, which represents
the consuming fire prepared for His enemies. And Draco, which
represents the old serpent cast down in defeat.

“And in thy majesty ride prosperously because of truth and meekness and
righteousness; and thy right hand shall teach thee terrible things. Thine
arrows are sharp in the heart of the king's enemies; whereby the people fall
under thee.” Psalms 45:4-5

The sign Capricorn represents the goat, the sacrificial death for
the redeemed.

The three decan constellations of Capricorn are Sagitta, which

means the arrow of our Heavenly Father sent forth for judgment.
Aquila, which represents the smitten One falling. And Delphinus,
which represents the dead One, Messiah, rising again.

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground
and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.”
John 12:24
The sign Aquarius represents the living waters of blessing
poured forth for the redeemed.

The three decan constellations of Aquarius are Piscis Australis,

which represents the southern fish, the blessings bestowed.
Pegasus, which represents the winged horse, the blessings quickly
coming. And Cygnus, which represents the sure return of our
Redeemer.

“In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If
any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me,
as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.”
John 7:37-38

The sign Pisces represents the redeemed blessed by our Liberator.

The three decan constellations of Pisces are The Band, which

represents the redeemed as bound. Andromeda, which represents
the redeemed in their bondage and affliction. And Cepheus, which
represents the King, the Redeemer, coming to rule.

“And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.”
Matthew 4:19

The sign Aries represents the lamb that was slain, prepared for
the victory.

The three decan constellations of Aries are Cassiopeia, which

represents the captive delivered, preparing for her husband, the
Redeemer. Cetus, which represents the sea monster, the great
enemy bound. And Perseus, which represents the breaker, Messiah,
delivering His redeemed.

“Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive
power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honor, and glory, and
blessing.” Revelation 5:12

The sign Taurus represents Messiah the wild bull coming to rule.
The three decan constellations of Taurus are Orion, which
represents the light breaking forth in the person of the Redeemer.
Eridanus, which represents the fiery wrath breaking forth on His
enemies. And Auriga, which represents the protection of His
people in the day of that wrath.

Messiah declared that he’s the Alpha and the Omega, which are the
first and last letters of the Greek alphabet. In the Hebrew alphabet,
they are the Aleph and the Tav. The symbol for the Aleph is an ox
head, and it means strength and leader.

“I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the
last.” Revelation 22:13

The sign Gemini represents the two-fold nature of the King.

The three decan constellations of Gemini are Lepus, which

represents the enemy trodden underfoot. Major Sirius, which
represents the coming glorious Prince. And Canis Minor, which
represents the exalted Redeemer.

“Looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy
that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has
sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.” Hebrews 12:2

The sign Cancer represents the possession, the redeemed, held

secure by Messiah.

The three decan constellations of Cancer are Ursa Minor, which

represents the lesser sheepfold. Ursa Major, which represents the
fold and the flock. And Argo, which represents the redeemed
pilgrims safe at home.

“While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that
thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of
perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled.” John 17:12
The sign Leo represents the Lion of the Tribe of Judah aroused
for the rending of the enemy.

The three decan constellations of Leo are Hydra, which represents

that old serpent, the devil, destroyed. Crater, which represents the
cup of divine wrath poured out on the serpent. And Corvus, which
represents the birds of prey devouring the old serpent.

“And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the
tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to
loose the seven seals thereof.” Revelation 5:5

Messiah is the Alpha and Omega not only in Scripture from Genesis
to Revelation, but also from Virgo to Leo in the Celestial Gospel of
the mazzaroth.

Even the Great Sphinx in Egypt points to this ancient message in

the stars, as it unifies the first and last signs of the Biblical
mazzaroth in the head of the woman Virgo with the body of the
Lion Leo.

The word Sphinx means 'to bind together.' It was therefore designed
to show where the two ends of the Zodiac are joined together,
where the great circle of the heavens begins and ends.

Scripture does not point to an infinite, ever-expanding universe,

with millions of other galaxies. Just one sphere of stars in the
second level of heaven is described, and the Heavenly Father’s
domain in the third level.

Could millions of galaxies exist? Yes. Could NASA be lying to

make people feel significant, to promote their evolution lie? Yes.
 CHAPTER 18
Heavenly Intrigue

You may have seen people proclaim to debunk the geocentric globe
earth model, but most of them are basing that claim on the
simplistic geocentric model, where the sun and earth are swapped,
and all of the planets are orbiting around the earth. On that model,
things such as the retrograde motion of planets, can’t be explained.

Up until the sixteen century, most astronomers pointed to a

simplistic geocentric universe; but all of that changed with the
brilliant mind of Tycho Brahe who developed a more complex
geocentric model, which is called the Tychonic geocentric model.
Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), a famous Danish astronomer, presented a
more advanced geocentric model which lines up with many of
Copernicus’s theories. He made the sun revolve around the earth,
and the planets revolve around the sun.

This accounted for the geometry and distances that Copernicus had
cited, and it allowed for retrograde motion of the planets. He also
put Mercury and Venus at their correct distances from the sun,
which corrected the Ptolemaic model.

Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “In contrast, Tycho Brahe whose astronomical observations far
exceeded those of Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo, knew that this was an
issue that involved the integrity of the Scriptures. The exceedingly absurd
opinion that the Earth revolves uniformly and perpetually nevertheless
made up a very great obstacle, and in addition the irrefutable authority of
the Holy Scriptures maintained the opposite view.”

I. Bernard Cohen, a famous U.S. physicist, wrote in his book

The Birth of a New Physics: “There is no planetary observation by which
we on earth can prove that the earth is moving in an orbit around the sun.
Thus all Galileo’s discoveries with the telescope can be accommodated to
the system invented by Tycho Brahe just before Galileo began his
observations of the heavens. In this Tychonic system, the planets Mercury,
Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn move in orbits around the sun, while the
sun moves in an orbit around the earth in a year. Furthermore, the daily
rotation of the heavens is communicated to the sun and planets, so that the
earth itself neither rotates nor revolves in an orbit.” (1)

Tycho was the last major astronomer to work without the aid of a
telescope. Instead, he used very advanced instruments which were
crafted and financed with the support of the Danish government.

They were a monument to his remarkable labors, and they help

explain the acclaimed accuracy of his calculations.
The brass azimuthal quadrant, 1576, was made to observe the paths
of comets.

The computational globe, 1580, recorded the position of stars. By

1595 he had 1000 accurately observed stars inscribed on the globe.
The armillary sphere, 1581, is a model of objects in the celestial
sphere.

The triangular sextant, 1582, began a series of large instruments.

The great equatorial armillary, 1585, allowed him to compute stellar
and planetary positions.

The revolving quadrant, 1586, was made of wood, and it helped

him map out the universe.
The revolving steel quadrant, 1588.

The great quadrant of Uraniborg, 1852.

Tycho Brahe hired an apprentice named Johannes Kepler, but Brahe

kept much of his research to himself until it was published.
Contrary to Brahe’s beliefs, Kepler advocated for the Copernican
heliocentric universe.
In the book, Heavenly Intrigue: Johannes Kepler, Tycho Brahe, and the
Murder Behind One of History’s Greatest Scientific Discoveries; authors
Joshua and Ann-Lee Gilder present the astonishing claim that not
only was Brahe murdered but that the chief suspect could only
have been his resident mathematician Johannes Kepler.

Here’s the description of their book: A real-life Amadeus: Set against

the backdrop of the Counter-Reformation, this is the story of the stormy
collaboration between two revolutionary astronomers, Tycho Brahe, and
Johannes Kepler. That collaboration would mark the dawn of modern
science . . . and end in murder.

Johannes Kepler changed forever our understanding of the universe with

his three laws of planetary motion. He demolished the ancient model of
planets moving in circular orbits and laid the foundation for the universal
law of gravitation, setting physics on the course of revelation it follows to
this day. Kepler was one of the greatest astronomers of all time.

Yet if it hadn't been for the now lesser-known Tycho Brahe, the man for
whom Kepler apprenticed, Kepler would be a mere footnote in today's
science books. Brahe was the Imperial Mathematician at the court of the
Holy Roman Emperor in Prague, the most famous astronomer of his era.

He was one of the first great systematic empirical scientists and one of the
earliest founders of the modern scientific method. His forty years of
planetary observations—an unparalleled treasure of empirical data—
contained the key to Kepler's historic breakthrough. But those observations
would become available to Kepler only after Brahe's death. This
groundbreaking history portrays the turbulent collaboration between these
two astronomers at the turn of the seventeenth century and their
shattering discoveries that would mark the transition from medieval to
modern science. But that is only half the story.

Based on recent forensic evidence (analyzed here for the first time) and
original research into medieval and Renaissance alchemy—all buttressed
by in-depth interviews with leading historians, scientists, and medical
specialists—the authors have put together shocking and compelling
evidence that Tycho Brahe did not die of natural causes, as has been
believed for four hundred years. He was systematically poisoned—most
likely by his assistant, Johannes Kepler.

An epic tale of murder and scientific discovery, Heavenly Intrigue reveals

the dark side of one of history’s most brilliant minds and tells the story of
court politics, personal intrigue, and superstition that surrounded the
protean invention of two great astronomers and their quest to find truth
and beauty in the heavens above.

The amount of mercury in Brahe’s hair sample was enormous, and

it points to two separate poisonings. The first at a dinner party,
where he had suddenly fallen ill; and the second the night before
his death when his condition had seemed to be improving. A spike
in calcium level a few hours before his death suggests that the
poison was administered in a glass of milk.

As a result of his unexpected death, all of his great instruments

were hidden away due to legal battles between Kepler and Tycho’s
heirs. And then all but the great globe were destroyed in the
aftermath of the Bohemian civil war of 1619. How convenient!

Tycho’s death allowed Kepler to access all of Brahe’s notes to use

for his Copernican explanations, and it effectively shut down the
witness of the brilliant Tycho Brahe who advocated the geocentric
globe earth model. Just two days after Tycho's death on October 24,
1601; Kepler was appointed as Brahe’s successor as the Imperial
Mathematician, perhaps as part of his reward.

We can see how Tycho’s research in proving out the geocentric

universe, was ended by his murder. We’ll see in another chapter,
how Kepler was directly connected to the conniving Jesuit’s of
Rome, who are behind the heliocentric deception.
 CHAPTER 19
The Geocentric Universe

We can see that Scripture describes a geocentric universe, with a

stationary earth and a sun that’s moving in a circuit.

I'm not scientific, and I'm not an expert in astronomy, so I won't try
to explain the design of the universe to you. What I will do is show
you some information which has been hidden from the general
population, even from college astronomy students.

When you think of the top names in the discussion; Copernicus,

Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Einstein, etc.; none of them ever provided
scientific proof that the Earth revolves around the sun, they only
gave a hypothesis.

While working at the request of Pope Leo X on improvements to

the Julian calendar, Nicolaus Copernicus developed a system in
which the earth moved. The concept was rejected for hundreds of
years, but the Jesuits propped up many scientists who promote it,
so that’s it become the model which is prevalent.

Modern scientists admit that heliocentrism is the preferred system

based on philosophical grounds, not scientific ones. Why would
they prefer the heliocentric view over the geocentric model?
Because a geocentric universe points to a Creator, and since they
can’t account for that, they side with the heliocentric view.

Here’s a summary of some notable experiments.

Attempts were made to prove that heliocentricity was true and

geocentricity was false, but they failed. Instead, the experiments
found that the Earth is standing still in space, which confronted the
scientific community with devastating evidence that potentially
destroyed the much revered Copernican Principle.
Flat-earthers ignorantly or deceptively cite these studies, but they
don’t point to a flat earth, rather they validate a geocentric globe
earth.

In 1871, George Bidell Airy sought to prove that the earth is

heliocentric, but instead, he proved that it’s stationary.

To test the ether theory he had starlight travel through an empty

telescope, and one filled with water slightly tipped to compensate
for the estimated decrease in velocity of light through water and the
estimated velocity of Earth. To his astonishment, the experiment
indicated that the Earth is stationary, thus it’s called Airy's Failure.

In 1877, the Michelson Morley Experiment established that the

earth is stationary.

The most famous experiment was the Michelson-Morley

Experiment. The New York Times described Professor Albert
Michelson as America’s greatest physicist foremost in determining the
velocity of light. Astronomers proclaimed that the earth travels
around the sun with a speed of more than eighteen miles a second,
or 66,000 miles per hour. Working with Edward Morley, he carried
out painstaking experiments to measure the velocity of the earth.

The theory was that light traveling east to west against the ether
traveled slower than light traveling north to south. The result
showed that there was slight motion, but not enough to indicate an
orbiting Earth. What Airy found by examining starlight was now
confirmed by Michelson with terrestrial light.

Michelson, who was dismayed at the results, said: "This conclusion

directly contradicts the explanation... which presupposes that the Earth
moves." (1)

Arthur Eddington gave a lecture in 1927, which is recorded in the

book The Nature of the Physical World, in which he said about the
Michelson-Morley experiment: “There was just one alternative;
the earth’s true velocity through space might happen to have been nil.” (2)

Austrian-born physicist and recipient of the 1945 Nobel Prize for

Physics, Wolfgang Pauli, said regarding the 1887 Michelson-Morley
experiment and subsequent experiments: “The failure of the many
attempts to measure terrestrially any effects of the earth’s motion (3)

Science historian and physicist John D. Bernal stated: “The

Michelson-Morley experiment was the greatest negative result in the
history of science.” In other words, they were expecting it to prove
that the Earth was moving in space, but they proved the very
opposite. (4)

In a book by Lincoln Barnett called The Universe And Dr. Einstein;

which Albert Einstein endorsed by writing the foreword, it says:
“The experiment was tried again by Morley and by others, with the same
conclusion: the apparent velocity of the Earth through the ether was zero.”
(5) “The Michelson-Morley experiment confronted scientists with an
embarrassing alternative. On the one hand they could scrap the ether
theory which had explained so many things about electricity, magnetism,
and light. Or if they insisted on retaining the ether they had to abandon
the still more venerable Copernican theory that the earth is in motion.

To many physicists it seemed almost easier to believe that the earth stood
still than that waves – light waves, electromagnetic waves – could exist
without a medium to sustain them. It was a serious dilemma and one that
split scientific thought for a quarter century. Many new hypotheses were
advanced and rejected. The experiment was tried again by Morley and by
others, with the same conclusion; the apparent velocity of the earth
through the ether was zero. We can’t feel our motion through space, nor
has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in
motion.” (6)

Physicist G.J. Whitrow, in his book The Structure and Evolution of the
Universe (1959), pointed out the implications of the Michelson-
Morley experiment in refuting Nicolaus Copernicus. “It is both
amusing and instructive to speculate on what might have happened if such
an experiment could have been performed in the sixteenth or seventeenth
centuries when men were debating the rival merits of the Copernican and
Ptolemaic systems. The result would surely have been interpreted as
conclusive evidence for the immobility of the Earth, and therefore as a
triumphant vindication of the Ptolemaic system and irrefutable
falsification of the Copernican hypothesis.” (7)

Physicist Bernard Jaffe said in his book Michelson and the Speed of
Light (1950): “The data were almost unbelievable… There was only one
other possible conclusion to draw – that the Earth is at rest.” (8)

Adolf Baker in his book Modern Physics and Antiphysics (1970) noted:
“Thus, the failure to observe different speeds of light at different times of
the year suggested that the Earth must be ‘at rest’… It was therefore the
‘preferred’ frame for measuring absolute motion in space.” (9)

I listed all of those quotes so that you can see the witness of the
experts, who with one voice proclaimed that the Michelson-Morley
experiment proved that the earth is at rest because the enemy has
hidden their witness. Astronomy students are not taught about the
experiment or the great witness about it.

Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “Though repeated with ever greater precision unto the present day,
the results are the same; the light beams return at about the same time,
showing virtually no movement on earth.”

Many people have been used in an attempt to cover over the

devastating results of the Michelson-Morley experiment; such as
George Fitzgerald, Hendrick Lorentz, Arthur Eddington, and
Albert Einstein.

Albert Einstein was used as controlled opposition.

In 1905, Einstein presented his Special Theory of Relativity, in which
he used mathematics to appear to provide proof that the Michelson-
Morley experiment was wrong. He proclaimed that the speed of
light is constant and limited and that there is no ether.

All of those statements have since been proven wrong. Mathematics

works in theory but is proven or disproven by real-world
experiments.

Albert Einstein is accused of being a Freemason celebrity scientist

who promoted heliocentrism to keep humanity enslaved in
ignorance. His Theory of Relativity was so purposefully
complicated with sophistry that few people in the world were
capable of understanding it.

The Sagnac Experiment debunked Einstein’s Special Theory of

Relativity.

In 1913, French physicist Georges Sagnac conducted an experiment

using a ring interferometer which proved the existence of the ether,
which Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity had discarded. And it
showed that either space or Earth could be moving, proving
Einstein’s theory is wrong.

Albert Einstein countered with the General Theory of Relativity

In an attempt to cover over the evidence of Sagnac’s Experiment, in

1915, Einstein presented his General Theory of Relativity, which
supposedly accounted for gravity and inertial forces in a rotating
reference frame.

It inadvertently allowed for Earth orbiting the sun or vice versa

because they’re relative. The greater the centrifugal force, the faster
light, or an object, can travel. The centrifugal force of the universe is
huge, so it made it possible that the stars are rotating faster than
186,000 miles per second around a central point.
The Michelson-Gale experiment in 1925 confirmed the results
obtained by Sagnac.

The Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment was a modified version of

the Michelson–Morley and the Sagnac Interferometer experiments.
It served to confirm Sagnac’s findings, once again proving the ether
and showing that relativity is based on perspective.

Science undergrad students are never taught about the Michelson-

Gale Experiment, Airy’s Failure, or the Sagnac Experiment.

Hebert Dingle invalidated Einstein’s Theory Of Relativity.

Hebert Dingle promoted Einstein’s theories for most of his life, and
he was the world’s foremost experts on the topic, writing the book,
The Special Theory Of Relativity, which became the standard work in
English. Then in 1959, after years of believing and promoting the
theory, he found something wrong, he found a paradox.

He wanted access to scientific journals to prove out his theory, but

he was denied. In 1972 he published a book called Science At The
Crossroads, which proves that the Theory of Relativity is invalid.
He found that movement was relative to the perspective of the
observer; and that the theory doesn’t prove which body is moving,
the sun or earth.

More evidence pointing to earth as the center of the universe has

come to light in recent years, which has been hidden by the enemy.

In addition to Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, other theories of

physics, such as Newton’s laws of motion and Mach’s Principle, say
that a universe rotating around a fixed Earth is as scientifically
valid as a rotating Earth in a fixed universe.

Every scientific proof for an Earth revolving around the sun has
been discredited, and no experiment has provided proof that the
Earth is moving.
Space probes reveal that the design of the universe points to the
earth at the center.

The cosmic microwave radiation’s dipole is aligned with the Earth’s

equator. The cosmic microwave radiation’s quadrupole and
octupole are aligned with the Earth-Sun ecliptic.

The distant quasars and radio galaxies are aligned with the Earth’s
equator and the North Celestial Pole. The Earth is in the center, and
the mass of the surrounding universe is represented by the giant
ball; showing how the signatures of the universe line up.

Essentially, three alignments provide the X, Y, and Z coordinates to

place Earth in the very center of the known universe. Not only are
the spin axes of galaxies and the cosmic microwave radiation
aligned with Earth, but the distribution of galaxies shows that they
lie mainly in concentric spheres around the Earth.

One important fact about the cosmic radiation alignment with the
Earth-Sun ecliptic is that it fits perfectly with the Tychonic
geocentric model. Since the Tychonic geocentric model has both the
stars and the polarity of the cosmic microwave radiation aligned
with the Sun, which all revolve around the fixed Earth, it is the only
model that fits all of the cosmological data.

In his book The Energy of Empty Space That Isn't Zero, Physicist
Lawrence Krauss said: "But when you look at CMB map, you also see
that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird way, correlated
with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back
to haunt us? That's crazy. We're looking out at the whole universe. That
would say we are truly the center of the universe." (10)

In his book The Red Shift Hypothesis for Quasars: Is the Earth the Center
of the Universe?, astrophysicist Yetendra P. Varshni said: "It is shown
that the cosmological interpretation of the red shift in the spectra of
quasars leads to yet another paradoxical result: namely, that the Earth is
the center of the Universe. The Earth is indeed the center of the Universe.
The arrangement of quasars on certain spherical shells is only with respect
to the Earth. These shells would disappear if viewed from another galaxy
or quasar. This means that the cosmological principle will have to go. Also,
it implies that a coordinate system fixed to the Earth will be a preferred
frame of reference in the Universe. Consequently, both the Special and
General Theory of Relativity must be abandoned for cosmological
purposes." (10)

In his book The Biggest Bangs, astrophysicist Jonathan I. Katz said:

"No longer could astronomers hope that the Copernican dilemma would
disappear with improved data. The data were in hand, and their
implication inescapable: we are at the center of a spherically symmetric
distribution of gamma-ray-burst sources, and this distribution has an
outer edge." (12)

It wasn’t until scientific probes produced data about the radiation

of the expanding universe, and the orientation of the quasars and
radio galaxies; that researchers were able to see that all of those
things were pointing back to Earth as the center of the universe. The
cover-up of these experiments has been astounding, in that students
in astronomy and other fields aren’t even taught about them.
Here are some more notable quotes.

Albert Einstein stated: “The possibility of solving these difficulties

depends on the answer to the following question. Can we formulate
physical laws so that they are valid for all coordinate systems, not only
those moving uniformly, but also those moving quite arbitrarily, relative
to each other? If this can be done, our difficulties will be over. We shall
then be able to apply the laws of nature to any coordinate system.
The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of
Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either
coordinate system could be used with equal justification. The two
sentences: “the sun is at rest and the Earth moves,” or “the sun moves and
the Earth is at rest,” would simply mean two different conventions
concerning two different coordinate systems.” (13)

James Coleman, a theoretical physicist, in his book Relativity for the

Layman, candidly stated: “The easiest explanation was that the earth
was fixed in the ether and that everything else in the universe moved with
respect to the earth and the ether… Such an idea was not considered
seriously, since it would mean in effect that our earth occupied the
omnipotent position in the universes, with all the other heavenly bodies
paying homage by moving around it.” (14)

George Ellis in an article titled Thinking Globally, Acting Universally,

said: "People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could
explain the observations… For instance, I can construct for you a
spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot
disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical
grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I
want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical
criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that." (15)

There’s a lot of compelling scientific evidence that the Earth is

indeed at the center of the universe, but the enemy has done a
masterful job of covering it over, to push the hopeless teaching of
evolution which undermines the Genesis account in the Bible.
It’s very interesting and telling, that shortly after these findings
were published in 2013, the flat earth theory began to be
aggressively pushed on YouTube and Facebook; seemingly to try to
cover over the evidence, and to cause people to dismiss anyone
who teaches that the Earth is geocentric.

Flat-earthers believe that the enemy has created a deception to hide

the design of the universe, to hide the Creator. I believe that is true,
but the enemy’s deception points to the geocentric globe earth
model; which is largely ignored both by flat earthers and
heliocentric globe-earth defenders.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), a German writer and

statesman, said this about the damage that Copernicus had caused:
“Among all the (scientific) discoveries and (new) convictions, not a single
one has resulted in deeper influence on the human spirit than the doctrine
of Copernicus. The Copernican revolution did indeed eventually bequeath
to modernity an essentially beginningless, structureless, purposeless, and
godless cosmos, in which the Earth and man henceforth appear as cosmic
specks, meaningless accidents wandering aimlessly about in the void.
All coherence—and all comfort—was indeed gone.” (16)

Christian astronomer Gerardus D. Bouw, PhD, in his book

Geocentricity: Christianity in the Woodshed, notes: “All of these
physicists (and there is not a geocentric Christian in the bunch) conclude
that there is no detectable, experimental difference between having the
Earth spin diurnally on an axis as well as orbit the sun once a year, or
having the universe rotate about the Earth once a day and possessing a
wobble centered on the sun which carries the planets and stars about the
Earth once a year. In none of these models would the universe fly apart,
nor would a stationary satellite fall to the earth. In every one of these
models the astronauts on the moon would still see all sides of the Earth in
the course of 24 hours, the Foucault pendulum would still swing exactly
the same way as we see it in museums, and the Earth’s equator would still
bulge. In other words, each of these effects is due to either the centrifugal
force, Coriolis force, or some combination of the two, and can be totally
explained in any geocentric model.” (16)

Nikola Tesla was a brilliant scientist, who filed more than three
hundred patents during his eighty-six years of life, and his
inventions helped pave the way for alternating current (AC),
electric motors, radios, fluorescent lights, lasers, remote controls,
among many other things. About Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, he
said: “The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in
magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people
blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple
whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men,
but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.” (17)

Stephen Hawking said: “So which is real, the Ptolemaic or the

Copernican system? Although it is not uncommon for people to say that
Copernicus proved Ptolemy wrong, that is not true. As in the case of our
normal view versus that of the goldfish, one can use either picture as a
model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained
by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest.” (18)

“All this evidence that the universe looks the same whichever direction we
look in might seem to suggest there is something special about our place in
the universe. In particular, it might seem that if we observe all other
galaxies to be moving away from us, then we must be at the center of the
universe. We reject it only on grounds of modesty.” (19)

“To the question whether or not the motion of the Earth in space can be
made perceptible in terrestrial experiments. We have already remarked...
that all attempts of this nature led to a negative result. Before the theory of
relativity was put forward, it was difficult to become reconciled to this
negative result.” (20)

“This ‘null’ result was one of the great puzzles of physics at the end of the
nineteenth century. One possibility was that...v would be zero and no
fringe shift would be expected. But this implies that the earth is somehow a
preferred object; only with respect to the earth would the speed of light be c
as predicted by Maxwell’s equations. This is tantamount to assuming that
the earth is the central body of the universe.” (21)

Before he died, Galileo confessed: “The falsity of the Copernican

system must not be cast into doubt on any account, and most particularly
not by us Catholics, having the infallible authority of the Sacred
Scriptures, interpreted by the greatest masters in theology, whose
harmonious agreement makes us certain of the immobility of the Earth,
situated in the centre, and the mobility of the Sun around it.” (22)

The enemy has covered over this evidence and pushed the
heliocentric model so that they can push their evolution agenda and
hide the Creator. Now you see why I believe that the real deception
of the enemy is the geocentric globe earth model and that the flat
earth theory has been promoted to cover over the truth, and to
discredit believers.

Can I scientifically prove that the earth is geocentric? No, but as

you’ve seen, the geocentric universe is the only model which
requires no excuses, as it’s fully congruent with Scripture; and
science has proven it to be true.

Evil men control the world in these end times, and I don’t blindly
trust what NASA and the scientific community tells me; for I know
that they’re lying about the age of the earth and evolution.

In his book The Biggest Bangs, astrophysicist Jonathan I. Katz said:

“The uniform distribution of [gamma-ray] burst arrival directions tells us
that the distribution of gamma-ray-burst sources in space is a sphere or
spherical shell, with us at the center.” "No longer could astronomers hope
that the Copernican dilemma would disappear with improved data. The
data were in hand, and their implication inescapable: we are at the center
of a spherically symmetric distribution of gamma-ray-burst sources, and
this distribution has an outer edge." (23)
Physicist and creator of the first IQ test, Arthur S. Otis said: “In the
effort to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment…the thought was
advanced that the Earth might be stationary. Such an idea was not
considered seriously, since it would mean in effect that our Earth occupied
the omnipotent position in the universe, with all the other heavenly bodies
paying homage by revolving around it.” (24)

Physicist Steven Weinberg said: "If we were to adopt a frame of

reference like Tycho's in which the Earth is at rest, then the distant
galaxies would seem to be executing circular turns once a year, and in
general relativity this enormous motion would create forces akin to
gravitation, which would act on the Sun and planets and give them the
motions of the Tychonic theory." (25)

Physicist Richard Wolfson said: "What happened when the experiment

was done in 1887? There was never, never, in any orientation at any time
of year, any shift in the interference pattern; none; no shift; no fringe shift;
nothing. What's the implication? Here was an experiment that was done
to measure the speed of the earth's motion through the ether. This was an
experiment that was ten times more sensitive than it needed to be.

It could have detected speeds as low as two miles a second instead of the
known 2mps that the earth as in its orbital motion around the sun. It
didn't detect it. What's the conclusion from the Michelson-Morley
experiment? The implications is that the earth is not moving." (26)

Scripture describes a geocentric universe and scientific experiments

have proven it out, but the enemy has covered it over.

Why are people believing the teachings of men, most of whom

reject the Creator of the Holy Scriptures?
 “My son, if you receive my words, And treasure my commands within
you, So that you incline your ear to wisdom, And apply your heart to
understanding; Yes, if you cry out for discernment, And lift up your voice
for understanding, If you seek her as silver, And search for her as for
hidden treasures; Then you will understand the fear of the Lord,
And find the knowledge of God.”
Proverbs 2:1-5
 CHAPTER 20
The Jesuit Deception

Dr. Valentine Ernest Loescher (1673-1749) said: “No sooner was the
very uncertain doctrine (Copernicanism) brought up that the sun is at
rest and our globe revolves around him, than the contempt of Holy Writ
and infidelity notably increased. On the other hand, vanity was rampant,
and the desire to accept and circulate absurd opinions.” (1)

To understand why the deception of the heliocentric universe was

created, we have to look back to how Satan has fought against
Messiah and His saints. In Daniel’s prophecies, he describes four
beast kingdoms which consecutively reign in power until Messiah
returns; Babylon > Medo-Persia > Greece > Rome.

The fourth beast kingdom of Rome was in power during Messiah’s

ministry, and it was used to desolate the city of Jerusalem, the
temple and many Jews, in 70 AD. Satan used the Roman Emperors
to try to wipe out the early church, killing millions of saints during
the first few centuries; but Messiah’s assembly of saints grew
stronger. HalleluYah!

As the Roman Empire was declining from bloody civil wars,

economic strife, famine, and pestilence; Satan changed his strategy
and sought to create a ‘christian’ church of his own, which has the
veneer of the true faith but misleads people with a false salvation
message, and concepts which are contrary to Scripture.

If you’re Catholic, my intention isn’t to offend you, but you need to

know the truth so that you’re in right standing before the Father.
Prophecy fulfillment and historical evidence show that the enemy
formed the Roman Catholic Church to seek to destroy Messiah’s
true assembly of saints from within. Messiah commanded people to
come out of the teachings of the harlot church.
At its core, the doctrine of the Papal Church is based on the
Babylonian mystery religion of sun god worship, which is why
there’s an Egyptian obelisk (a phallic symbol of the Egyptian sun
god Ra) erected in the middle of a sun wheel, in St. Peter’s Square.

It’s why there’s a massive sun symbol inside of St. Peter’s Basilica,
which is filled with the statues of pagan gods, who they gave the
names of the apostles and Mary. It’s why they raise up a round
Eucharist wafer (which symbolizes the sun god) and cause people
to revere it.

They proclaim that it becomes the body of Christ, but the ‘christ’
that they’re symbolizing is the supposed incarnate son of the
Babylonian moon goddess Semiramis, Tammuz.

Tammuz is the pagan christ child that the Israelites were

worshiping, as they were idolatrous worshippers of the sun god.
"He said also unto me, Turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater
abominations that they do. Then he brought me to the door of the gate of
the LORD'S house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat
women weeping for Tammuz.” Ezekiel 8:13-14

Through the Roman bishops and Emperors, the counterfeit

christian church was set up. The saints had been harshly persecuted
by Rome for hundreds of years, so when Emperor Constantine
ended the persecutions, the Roman leaders sought to cause people
to compromise their beliefs and join with the Roman church. Sadly,
many apostatized and fell away from the true faith.

After the last Western Roman Emperor was removed from power
in 476 AD, the Roman Popes took authority over the Roman
Empire. As their power and influence increased, their
proclamations became more blasphemous; as they proclaimed to be
god, to be Jesus Christ in the flesh, and to forgive sins. The Popes
created many concepts which are contrary to Scripture.
During the Dark Ages, the Popes banned and burned the
Scriptures, and persecuted the saints who believed the Scriptures
over their teachings. They tortured the saints to try to get them to
convert to Catholicism. Google images of ‘catholic torture devices’
and you’ll see their demonic brutal torture devices.

During the Protestant Reformation, the saints defended Scripture

over the teachings of the Popes. They exposed the falsehood of the
doctrine that Catholic Popes and priests can forgive sins, that
salvation is through the sacraments, that Mary is the intercessor to
the Father, etc. The Reformers testified that the teachings of the
Popes are anti-Messiah.

The Jesuits of Rome were empowered in the 16th century to counter

the Protestants regarding ecclesiastic matters, and to deceive the
world about many things. The Jesuits are not just a priestly order,
but a military power, which is led by the Superior General, who is
referred to as the Black Pope.

The founder of the Jesuit order, Ignatius Loyola; used self-

flagellation, spent time in caves on spiritual retreats, and studied
the principles of the Satanic Egyptian Kabbalah; to develop his evil
‘religious’ beliefs. The Jesuit Spiritual Exercises subject Jesuit priests
to meditations, prayers, and other contemplative practices; which
causes them to become mind-controlled, with unquestioned
obedience to the orders of the Superior General.

Here’s part of the Jesuit Oath which exposes their evil guiding
‘principles’: I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when
opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly,
against all heretics, Protestants, and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to
extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that
I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil,
flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs
and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the
walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the
same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the
strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless
of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever
may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may
be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the
Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

French military genius Napoleon Bonaparte told us exactly who the

Jesuits are: “The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious
order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a
monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most
despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the
world by the volition of a single man (the office of the Superior General
of the Jesuits). Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms; and at the
same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses. Their society is by
nature dictatorial, and therefore it is the irreconcialable enemy of all
constituted authority. Every act, every crime, however atrocious, is a
meritorious work, if committed for the interest of the Society of Jesus, or by
the order of the general.” (2)

Messiah warned, “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in

sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15

That describes the Jesuit leaders ‘to a T,’ as they dress and act like
Christian priests (lamb-like), but they’re really wolves who serve
Satan (the dragon).

Interestingly, the third Jesuit Superior General from 1565-1572,

Francesco Borgia, said: “We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves.
We shall be expelled like dogs and return like eagles.”

The Strong’s Greek Dictionary word for “false prophet” is 5578

pseudoprophetes from 5571 and 4396; which means a spurious prophet,
i.e., pretended foreteller or a religious impostor. Greek word 5571
pseudes means untrue, i.e., erroneous, deceitful, wicked:—false, liar.
The Superior General is exactly that, a false priest, a religious
impostor; who doesn’t serve our Heavenly Father or Messiah, but
rather he wickedly serves Satan. He hypocritically feigns to be a
priest, in order the better to covertly make war with Messiah and
His saints. Jesuit priests carried out the Inquisition and tortured and
killed the saints if they didn’t convert to Catholicism.

A one-man antichrist can’t just magically control the world.

The militant Jesuit Order, who have historically been kicked out of
many countries, including primarily Catholic ones; has covertly set
up a vast organization of people who control most of the world.

The Jesuits founded the Bavarian Illuminati through Adam

Weishaupt; they infiltrated Freemasonry to illuminate people’s
minds, to use the leaders for their agenda; they use the Rothschild
family to steal the wealth of nations via their fraudulent central
banks, such as the Federal Reserve bank, through which they print
money out of thin air and charge interest on it; and they control
many people groups and the major corporations; in an attempt to
push the world into a Satanic One World Government.

At the lower levels of the Jesuit Order are priests who are oblivious
to the deeds of the leaders; who are used to spread the false gospel
of Catholicism around the world, and to do works of service in
order to give Jesuits a good reputation.

It’s through these Jesuit leaders that many deceptions have been
inspired. The Popes had banned and burned the Scriptures during
the Dark Ages so that they could control the message. But during
the Protestant Reformation, the saints were given the manuscripts,
and they translated them into the common languages, and with the
advent of the printing press, the printed Bible was spread around
the world; proclaiming the true salvation message, which exposes
the Popes’ teachings as anti-Messiah.
The Jesuits can’t stop Bibles from being printed, so since the 16th
century, they’ve worked hard to corrupt Bibles. They used heretics
Brook Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, who don’t
believe in the deity of Messiah; to create the Westcott and Hort Greek
New Testament in 1811 and the English Revised Version Bible in 1815;
which has led to more corrupt Bible versions such as the New
International Version (NIV); all of which are missing many words
and verses which validate Messiah’s deity.

Knowing the role of the Jesuits, let’s focus on how they’ve worked
to counter beliefs that the universe is geocentric. Up until the 16th
century, the scientific community believed that the globe earth is
the center of the universe. Believers understood that the language
of Scripture is geocentric.

Knowing that Satan’s goal is to cause people to reject the Scriptures

and the Creator, and to steal worship away from Him; he contrived
the heliocentric model of the universe to act as the vehicle to push
the evolution narrative, which is contrary to the Genesis account of
creation, and serves to undermine the validity of the Scriptures.

Enter Nicolas Copernicus, a Polish Catholic who belonged to the

Third Order of St. Dominic. He studied astronomy in his pursuit of
a career in the Catholic Church. He learned that Aristarchus of
Samos, a Greek philosopher in the third century BC, proposed that
the sun was the center of the universe, not the earth. Helios is the
Greek sun god, so the sun-centered model of the universe was
named the heliocentric system.

Catholic bishops urged Copernicus to submit his manuscripts for

publication, as they wanted the heliocentric view to be pushed, but
he delayed until he was near death. He waited so that he didn’t
have to face the backlash of his contemporaries who believed that
the earth is geocentric.
A completed, published copy of his book was placed in his hands
shortly before his death in May 1543. Copernicus dedicated his
book, Revolutions of the Heavenly Bodies, to Pope Paul III.

Here’s some key excerpts from the dedication, which are very
telling: I can easily conceive, most Holy Father, that as soon as some
people learn that in this book which I have written concerning the
revolutions of the heavenly bodies, I ascribe certain motions to the Earth,
they will cry out at once that I and my theory should be rejected.

Accordingly, when I considered in my own mind how absurd a

performance it must seem to those who know that the judgment of many
centuries has approved the view that the Earth remains fixed as center in
the midst of the heavens, if I should, on the contrary, assert that the Earth
moves. Therefore, when I considered this carefully, the contempt which
I had to fear because of the novelty and apparent absurdity of my view,
nearly induced me to abandon utterly the work I had begun. (3)

Those are the words of someone who published a theory which is

against his good conscience, who was stating that he was pressured
to complete this work, which he knew was absurd.

The Protestant Reformers not only witnessed against Rome’s false

gospel; but they opposed the concept of a heliocentric universe as
well, as it’s contrary to Scripture.

In a Table Talk discussion with Martin Luther, the topic of

Copernicus came up, to which Luther replied: “So it goes now.
Whoever wants to be clever must agree with nothing that others esteem.
He must do something of his own.

This is what that fellow does who wishes to turn the whole of astronomy
upside down. Even in these things that are thrown into disorder I believe
the Holy Scriptures, for Joshua (10:12) commanded the sun to stand still,
and not the earth.” (4)
Protestant Reformer John Calvin also opposed Copernican
heliocentrism, warning his followers against those who asserted:
“that the sun does not move and that it is the earth that moves and turns.”
Such persons were motivated by “a spirit of bitterness, contradiction, and
faultfinding;” possessed by the devil, they aimed “to pervert the order of
nature.” (5)

John Calvin said: “The heavens revolve daily, and, immense as is their
fabric, and inconceivable the rapidity of their revolutions, we experience no
concussion — no disturbance in the harmony of their motion. The sun,
though varying its course every diurnal revolution, returns annually to
the same point. The planets, in all their wanderings, maintain their
respective positions. How could the earth hang suspended in the air were it
not upheld by God’s hand? By what means could it maintain itself
unmoved, while the heavens above are in constant rapid motion, did not its
Divine Maker fix and establish it?” (6)

Joseph F. MacDonnell, a Jesuit historian, in his book Companions of

Jesuits: A Tradition of Collaboration (1995) declared: “It is a challenge
for historians to find a single significant scientist of the sixteenth,
seventeenth and eighteenth centuries who was not in some way involved
with Jesuits and their colleagues: as students, as teachers, as relatives, as
collaborators, as adversaries, as rivals or simply as personal friends.” (7)

Martin Luther stating his objection to heliocentrism due to his

Scripture's geocentrism, said: “There is talk of a new astrologer
(Copernicus) who wants to prove that the earth moves and goes around
instead of the sky, the sun, the moon, just as if somebody were moving in a
carriage or ship might hold that he was sitting still and at rest while the
earth and the trees walked and moved.

But that is how things are nowadays: when a man wishes to be clever he
must . . . invent something special, and the way he does it must needs be
the best! The fool wants to turn the whole art of astronomy upside-down.
However, as Holy Scripture tells us, so did Joshua bid the sun to stand
still and not the earth.” (8)
Martin Luther’s fellow Protestant Reformer, Melanchthon, said:
“The eyes are witnesses that the heavens revolve in the space of twenty-
four hours. But certain men, either from the love of novelty, or to make
display of ingenuity, have concluded that the earth moves; and they
maintain that neither the eighth sphere nor the sun revolves… Now, it is a
want of honesty and decency to assert such notions publicly, and the
example is pernicious. It is the part of a good mind to accept the truth as
revealed by God to acquiesce in it.” (9)

Puritan Doctor John Owen held the Copernican theory to be a

“delusive and arbitrary hypothesis, contrary to Scripture.” (10)

Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “The Scriptures went beyond what man could naturally see and
know. If the Bible were but a retelling of what men saw, then of course it
ceases to be a revelation. There is nothing revelatory about the language of
appearance! Thus when this ancient belief system was overthrown through
the influence, of Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo, there was a sense that the
Bible had been directly violated.“It is for this reason that Bible believers in
that previous day were loath to surrender to heliocentricity. They
considered that the Scriptures themselves were being surrendered. They
were right! And, it was a surrender that prepared the way for the next
great capitulation: Darwinism!”

One would think that Jesuit priests would only be focused on

ecclesiastical matters, but that is far from the truth. They are
actively involved in the field of science, especially in astronomy,
which allows them to control the message.

To see a list of well-known Jesuit astronomers, Google the search

term “Wikipedia list of catholic clergy scientists.”

Christopher Clavius (1537–1612), a leading Jesuit astronomer in the

sixteenth century, incorporated Copernican mathematical models in
the Jesuit curriculum and was the principal scholar behind the
creation of the Gregorian calendar.
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) has been called the "father of observational
astronomy," the "father of modern physics," the "father of the scientific
method," and the "father of modern science."

Galileo was close friends with Christopher Clavius, who no doubt

had a great influence on his explanations. When Galileo published
his book Starry Messenger (1610), Jesuit astronomers confirmed his
discoveries. Galileo’s interest in falling bodies originated with a
Jesuit named Niccolo Cabeo (1586-1650).

Another Jesuit, Honore Fabri (1608-1688), was the first to explain

Galileo’s experiment demonstrating equal time for falling bodies.

We can see the direct relationship of Galileo’s explanations and the

support of the Jesuits.

You’ve already read about Johannes Kepler, who was the assistant
of Tycho Brahe until Brahe died under mysterious circumstances.
When Kepler became destitute and didn’t have a telescope of his
own, a Jesuit mathematician named Paul Guldin (1577-1643)
encouraged fellow Jesuit Niccolo Zucchi (1586-1670) to provide
Kepler with a telescope.

Kepler was so grateful that he dedicated his book to Guldin. “To the
very reverend Father Paul Guldin, priest of the Society of Jesus, venerable
and learned man, beloved patron. There is hardly anyone at this time with
whom I would rather discuss matters of astronomy than with you.

Even more of a pleasure to me, therefore, was the greeting from your
reverence which was delivered to me by members of your order who are
here. Fr. Zucchi could not have entrusted this most remarkable gift –
I speak of the telescope – to anyone whose effort in his connection pleases
me more than yours. Since you are the first to tell me that this jewel is to
become my property, I think you should receive from me the first literary
fruit of the joy that I gained from trial of this gift.” (11)
When Kepler was unable to get his Almanac printed, the Jesuit
College at Ingolstadt took control of getting it published. Kepler
clearly had an intimate relationship with the Jesuits.

Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître (1894-1966), was a Jesuit

trained Belgian priest, mathematician, astronomer, and professor of
physics at the Catholic University of Louvain. He’s the father of the
big bang theory. He was a close friend of Albert Einstein, perhaps his
handler, as Einstein was used to counter teachings of a fixed earth
and the geocentric universe.

Interestingly, in 2014, Jesuit Pope Francis professed support of the

big bang theory and evolution, saying: “The Big Bang, that today is
considered to be the origin of the world, does not contradict the creative
intervention of God; on the contrary, it requires it. Evolution in nature is
not in contrast with the notion of (divine) creation because evolution
requires the creation of the beings that evolve.” (12)

Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881-1955) was the creator of the

Piltdown man hoax, in which a small human skull was mated to the
jaw of an orangutan.

One would imagine that the hoax of the evolution theory would be
promoted by an atheist, but here we see that it is the Jesuits.

Dr. Jack Moorman in his book The Biblical Case For Geocentricity,
said: “The researches of Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton did not
produce clear proof that the earth both rotates on an axis and orbits the
sun. Yet this view became firmly established in the world’s universities by
the mid-17th century.”

The Jesuits brought former Nazi Germany scientists to the USA

during Operation Paperclip, some who were used to lead NASA, to
create an entity which would allow them to control the message
about the design of the universe. Though many countries and
universities have observatories; NASA is the world-wide authority
in making statements about discoveries, about lunar missions,
about photographs, etc.

Many of the major telescopes and observatories in the world are

owned and controlled by the Jesuits. They control the Vatican
Advanced Technology Telescope (VATT) on Mount Graham in
southeast Arizona. The Large Binocular Telescope is one of the
world's largest and most powerful optical telescopes.

Scripture describes a geocentric earth, not a heliocentric one.

The saints believed that the earth is geocentric until the Jesuits
propped up astronomers who taught the heliocentric system. They
pushed their deception until it has become the accepted model,
despite the lack of evidence.

Mainstream scientists declare that the earth is in a heliocentric

universe, but that doesn’t mean that it’s true, for we know that the
enemy seeks to deceive people about the Creator, to steal glory
away from Him.

It comes down to a battle between Scientific Jesuitism, as the Jesuits

control the modern scientific community; versus the Biblical-
Geocentric explanation. I list geocentric research resources at the end
of this book if you want to get more detailed information.
 CHAPTER 21
The Copernican Shift

The Copernican Revolution has changed the mindset of future

generations, to separate them from the Creator of Scripture.

Karl von Gebler in his book Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia, said:
"Before the powerful mind of Copernicus ventured to question it, our earth
was held to be the centre of the universe, and about it all the rest of the
heavenly bodies revolved. There was but one 'world,' and that was our
earth; the whole firmament, infinitely, was the fitting frame to the picture,
upon which man, as the more perfect being, held a position which was
truly sublime. It was an elevating thought that you were on the centre, the
only fixed point amidst countless revolving orbs!

The narrations in the Bible, and the character of the Christian religion as a
whole, fitted this conception exceedingly well; or, more properly speaking,
were made to fit it. The creation of man, his fall, the flood, and our second
venerable ancestor, Noah, with his ark in which the continuation of races
was provided for, the foundation of the Christian religion, the work of
redemption all this could only lay claim to universal importance so long as
the earth was the centre of the universe, the only world. Then all at once a
learned man makes the annihilating assertion that our world was not the
centre of the universe." (1)

Dr. Andrew White said: “Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, and

Newton came—and when their work was done the old theological
conception of the universe was gone. These five men had given a new
divine revelation to the world.” (2)
Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) was professor emeritus of philosophy at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His many books include
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Black-Body Theory and the
Quantum Discontinuity, and The Copernican Revolution. He said:
“Who will venture to place the authority of Copernicus above that of the
Holy Spirit?” (3)

J.A. Moorman, in his book The Biblical and Observational Case for
Geocentricity, said: “The fire Copernicus lit was called a “Revolution.” It
was a revolution in the fullest sense of the word. It completely reshaped the
way men thought about the world and life itself. Only something on this
scale could have prepared the way for Darwinism. And, note that even that
was not called a “revolution.“

The Copernican Revolution removed the earth from its special

place, in the center of the universe, and reduced it to the status of
another planet that revolves around the sun.

It portrays our solar system and even the Milky Way Galaxy, as
nothing special. We continually see NASA proclaiming that there
are millions of galaxies just like it.

The concept of heliocentrism was the beginning of the assault on

the authority of Scripture. It is the key vehicle to push the evolution
agenda, to try to invalidate the authority of the Genesis narrative
and steal glory from the Creator.

Charles Darwin was a believer in the Copernican Theory.

The evil theory of evolution is based on the heliocentric model. We

are constantly bombarded with this message of evolving through
chance and time. Through repetition, the enemy has programmed
people’s minds to trust the heliocentric model.
Sigmund Freud said: “Darwin seems to me to be the Copernicus of the
organic world. In the sixteenth century, Copernicus put an end to the
anthropocentric theory by doing away with the Ptolemaic spheres and
bringing our earth down to the rank of an insignificant planet. (4)

Copernicus was used to remove the importance of the earth as the

center of the universe, and Darwin was used to remove the
importance of man.

Carl Sagan was used to reinforce that the earth is insignificant.

Carl Sagan, in his TV series “Cosmos” and in his book, “Pale Blue
Dot,” reinforced the insignificance of the planet Earth. Sagan said,
“Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have
some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of
pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic
dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will
come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.” (5)

The enemy has pushed the belief that everything you see on earth,
including the person you see in the mirror, is the result of a cosmic
accident that resulted from the Big Bang.

Humanism has been pushed in place of the Creator.

Humanism, the outlook or system of thought attaching prime

importance to human rather than divine or supernatural matters, is
based on the heliocentric model.

These quotes show you the significance of the Copernican Shift,

which was the design of the enemy.

Poet Johann von Goethe said: "But among all the discoveries and
corrections probably none has resulted in a deeper influence on the human
spirit than the doctrine of Copernicus.

Possibly mankind has never been demanded to do more, for considering all
that went up in smoke as a result of realizing this change: a second
Paradise, a world of innocence, poetry and piety: the witness of the senses,
the conviction of a poetical and religious faith. No wonder his
contemporaries did not wish to let all this go and offered every possible
resistance to a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown
indeed not even dreamed of." (6)

Historian Herbert Butterfield taught about the origins of modern

science, saying: "The Copernican revolution outshines everything since
the rise of Christianity and reduces the Renaissance and Reformation to
the rank of mere episodes, mere internal displacements, within the system
of medieval Christendom. Since it changed the character of men's habitual
mental operations even in the conduct of the non-material sciences, while
transforming the whole diagram of the physical universe and the very
texture of human life itself, it looms so large as the real origin both of the
modern world and of the modern mentality, that our customary
periodisation of European history has become an anachronism and an
encumbrance." (7)

Philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche pointed to moving the earth from

its central place in the universe, to effectively killing God, saying:
"Where has God gone?" he cried. "I shall tell you. We have killed him -
you and I. We are his murderers. But how have we done this? How were
we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the
entire horizon? What did we do when we unchained the Earth from its
sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving now? Away
from all suns? Are we not perpetually falling? Backward, sideward,
forward, in all directions? Is there any up or down left? Are we not
straying as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of
empty space? Has it not become colder? Is it not more and more night
coming on all the time? Must not lanterns be lit in the morning?

Do we not hear anything yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are
burying God? Do we not smell anything yet of God's decomposition?
Gods, too, decompose. God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed
him. How shall we, murderers of all murderers, console ourselves?" (8)

In The Winds of War, Herman Wouk states: "Christianity is dead and

rotting since Galileo cut its throat." (9)

Copernicanism was the foundation on which the other false

narratives were built; all of which seek to invalidate the Genesis
creation narrative, to invalidate the authority of the Scriptures, and
to remove glory from our Creator.

Our Heavenly Father is not dead, He is sustaining the universe, but

sadly the witness against the enemy’s lie of heliocentrism has
become as good as dead.

“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”

Romans 1:22
 CHAPTER 22
Believer’s False Science

F.E. Pasche (1915), in his book Fifty Reasons – Copernicus Or The

Bible, said: “Our result is: the Copernican system is not at all proven. All
exertions of science cannot make the Biblical view of the relation between
the bodies of the universe in the least doubtful; on the contrary, what has
been found, only helps to confirm the fact that Scripture is the truth also in
such questions, and that also there it never accommodates itself to the
erroneous conceptions of men.” (1)

The celebrated Dr. Walther wrote: “As is well known, the modern
astronomers or star-gazers claim that by the Copernican system
(according to which the earth moves round the sun) the Bible—according
to which the sun moves round the earth—is completely refuted and
overthrown. And yet these gentle men demand that the Christians now
should believe just as much in the Copernican system as before they did in
the Bible. For they say that he who is no professional astronomer, has no
right to judge their teaching; and therefore it were a great shame that yet
there are people who, though not experts in astronomy like themselves, do
not believe everything they say.” (2)

R.C. Sproul of Ligonier Ministries noted: “But historically the

Church’s understanding of special revelation of the Bible has been
corrected by students of natural revelation with the Copernican
Revolution. Both Calvin and Luther rejected Copernicus as an Heretic in
the sixteenth century. I don’t know anybody in Orthodox Christianity
today who is pleading for Geocentricity. Do you? Do you know anybody?
In that case, the church is saying we misinterpreted the teaching of the
Bible with respect to the solar system, so thank you scientists for
correcting our misunderstanding. So I think we may learn from non-
believing scientists, whom are studying natural revelation, they may be
getting a better sense of the truth by studying the natural revelation, from
what I get for ignoring natural revelation. I have a high view of natural
revelation, is what I’m saying. However, if something may be shown that
is definitively be taught in the Bible, without question, and someone gives
me something that is from natural revelation, that they think is from
natural revelation, I’m going to stand with the Word of God a hundred
times out of a hundred.” (3)

How is it that the Scriptures, which is our authority, describes a

geocentric universe; yet Bible colleges, seminaries, Genesis creation
ministries, pastors, and most Christians, believe in the heliocentric
model? How are they missing it?

At this point in the game, the enemy has influence with most
Christian ministries; either directly or indirectly. Seminaries and
Bible colleges have been infiltrated, and teach false prophecy
fulfillment explanations, and false beliefs about the design of the
universe.

Dr. Thomas M. Strouse in The Geocentric Cosmology said: “The earth

is preeminent in the Lord’s creation and not the sun. The Bible never
teaches that the earth moves around the sun or that it is ever in the
heavens to do so. Christianity, and fundamentalism within, has embraced,
for the most part, a fallacious cosmology based on man’s reasoning rather
than Bible exegesis. Rather than looking to the Scriptures which the
Creator wrote for absolute cosmology, many receive the philosophy of men
(Col. 2:8) and are severely benighted.”

Dr. Thomas M. Strouse in Biblical Geocenticity said: “This rejection is

due to several fallacious approaches to the Scriptures. These approaches
include the following: 1) the un-biblical presupposi-tion of an “infinite
universe,” 2) the phenomenological interpretation of Scripture, 3) the
presumption that the Bible must be subjugated to sci-ence, 4) the erection
of straw men arguments, and 5) the presence of faulty exegesis of
Scripture.”
“Another vocal proponent of Heliocentric Creationism states: “We really
don’t know where the physical center of the universe is. If God’s heavens
are infinite in extent, then no center actually exists. But the question of the
earth’s physical position is less important than the spiritual reality of
God’s love for his people.”

“The theologian’s phenomenological argument is even more blatantly

erroneous since there was no human standing on earth with his “naked
eye” observing the creation (at least through Day Five). The
phenomenological hermeneutic does not allow the Lord God to speak
absolutely.

Would the Heliocentric Creationist want to employ the phenomenological

hermeneutic to the account of the ten plagues on Egypt (Ex. 7-12), or to
the Red Sea crossing (Ex. 14), or to the feeding of the five thousand (Mt.
14), or to the account of the Lord Jesus walking on the water (Mt. 15:26)?
Did the Lord Jesus Christ walk on water absolutely, or did it only appear,
from a phenomenological perspective, that He walked on water? To reject
the phenomenological hermeneutic for some Scriptures and to utilize it
selectively for Geocentric passages is not only subjective but also un-
biblical and therefore an erroneous handling of the Bible.

This phenomenological hermeneutic devastates the absolute truth of

Scripture and must be avoided by Christians who want to honor the Lord’s
Words. Although the Bible has figures of speech and poetry, it must be
interpreted literally and contextually for the student of Scripture to
understand God’s absolute truth.”

The Institute for Creation Research

Dr. Gerald A. Aardsma, who writes for ICR, admits that in light of
Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, geocentricity is fully scientific and
acceptable. He says, “According to this theory the geocentric and
heliocentric viewpoints are equally valid representations of reality, and it
makes no sense whatsoever scientifically to speak of one as being true and
the other false.”
But then he disconnects the geocentric model from Scripture,
“Geocentricity and creationism are really separate matters. Because of the
contrast in the way the Bible deals with these two issues, I believe that
attempts to link geocentricity and creationism are ill-founded.” (4)

How can he claim that the geocentric universe is fully scientific and
acceptable; but then disconnect it from Scripture, which describes a
geocentric universe?

Creation Ministries International

In referring to Joshua’s long day, in which Scripture declares that

the sun stood still, unlike any other day, CRI dismisses it with this
explanation.

This very famous passage describes Joshua’s Long Day, and is often used
to support geocentric views, but what is it saying, really? Obviously, the
statements are being given in a local frame of reference. Why? Because the
sun standing over Gibeon would not appear to be overhead anywhere
except in the geographic vicinity of Gibeon. The valley of Aijalon is to the
west of Gibeon. Therefore, the moon would not appear to be to the west of
Gibeon to someone standing in Aijalon; it would be out over the
Mediterranean.

Many claim this passage teaches that God stopped the moving sun and
moon. Yet there is nothing here to say that he did not temporarily slow
down a rotating earth (as well as the hydrosphere and atmosphere). This
would produce the same effect. Or He could have stopped the movement of
everything in the universe. Same result. That something universal really
happened in history is shown by legends of a long night in people groups
on the other side of the globe. (5)

In referring to the sun being moved back ten degrees as a sign to

King Hezekiah, CRI dismisses it with this explanation.

And let us not forget the reversing of the course of the sun in the time of
Hezekiah (2 Kings 20:5–11, Isaiah 38:1–7), an event that was noticed, or
at least enquired about, by astronomers outside of Jerusalem (2 Chronicles
32:24–31). These deviations from the scientific norm are what allow us to
identify miracles when they occur.

In a geocentric universe, everything is one giant miracle with no simple

explanation (see below). Certainly, a geocentrist would not expect the sun
to stop or to move backward, but why not? There is no rational
explanation for the way the universe operates, so why could something out
of the ordinary not happen?

They just explain away those literal statements. Why? Because they
are either under the delusion of the enemy and are believing in the
teachings of man, or the enemy has infiltrated their ranks.

Answers In Genesis

Dr. Danny R. Faulkner wrote an article titled, Geocentrism and

Creation. He concludes with “I have examined the claims of leading
modern geocentrists and have found that their insistence that the Bible
teaches geocentrism is not well founded.” (6)

But he didn’t even discuss key geocentric Bible verses; such as the
first four days of Genesis which are geocentric, Psalms 19:1-6
declaring that the sun is running a circular course, Joshua’s long
day when the sun was commanded to stand still, and the sun being
moved back as a sign to King Hezekiah.

That is a miserable explanation by a Christian ministry to defend

Scripture. Are they just deceived or are they deceivers?

Creationists offer rebuttals that geocentrism is flawed, but when

you read their exposition of Scripture, you see that they’ve
considered very few passages.

And they largely ignore the more advanced Tychonic geocentric

model, primarily focusing their comments on the standard
geocentric model.
F.E. Pasche (1915), in his book Fifty Reasons – Copernicus Or The
Bible, said: “Disguised as astronomy and geology, science has
demonstrated triumphantly that the very first chapters of the Bible contain
nothing but myths, which are of no greater historical value than the
cosmogony of any pagan people.” (7)

Dr. A. L. Graebner proclaimed: “When the Christian layman in geology

or astronomy finds a discrepancy between the Scriptures and what
confronts him as a result of scientific work, the proper thing for him to do
is to abide by the Scripture and lay that thing of science aside as
erroneous.” (8)

We need to side with Scripture over the teachings of man, for we

know that the enemy perverts science to push evolution, to
discredit the Scriptures, and to steal glory from our Creator.

“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane

and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called.”
1 Timothy 6:20
 CHAPTER 23
Summary

Many verses have to be explained away to try to justify the

heliocentric model, but the Tychonic geocentric explanation is fully
congruent with Scripture.

The creation account in Genesis is geocentric: the earth was created

first, then the heavens around the earth, then the sun and moon
which provide light and signs to the earth. It never says that the
earth was put in motion around the sun.

No Bible verse says that the earth is moving, in a circuit, or

spinning; but they do proclaim that it stands still.

Psalms 33:9 says, “For he spake, and it was (done); he commanded, and it
stood fast.”

Psalms 119:90 says, “thou hast established the earth, and it abideth.
(Hebrew word amad means to stand still, to stay)”
Bible verses proclaim that the sun is moving.

Psalms 19:4-6 says that the sun is “running,” “going forth”, in a

“circuit;” which describes an action.

Judges 5:31 says that the sun “goeth forth in his might,” which
describes movement.

Ecclesiastes1:5 says, “The sun also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and
hasteth to his place where he arose.”

How can a sun hasten to his place, if it’s always in the same place?
Ecclesiastes 1:5-7 describes three things which move continually
relative to the earth: the sun, the wind, and the rivers. We know the
wind and rivers move, so it makes no sense to proclaim that the sun
is just standing still.

Jasher 68:15 refers to “the sun in his circuit,” on the ecliptic circle of
Isaiah 40:22 and circuit of heaven of Job 22:14.

1 Esdras 4:34 says, “swift is the sun in his course, for he compasseth the
heavens round about, and fetcheth his course again to his own place in one
day.”

Bible verses proclaim that the sun stood still on one day, and it
never happened again; proving that it’s normally moving.

Joshua 10:12-14 says that “the sun stood still, and the moon stayed” and
that “there was no day like that before it or after it.”

Habakkuk 3:11 also documents that “the sun and moon stood still.”

Jasher 88:63-65 says that the “sun stood still” and “the moon also stood
still,” and that “there was no day like that, before it or after it” It’s
saying that on no other day does the sun and moon stand still.

“And when they were smiting, the day was declining toward evening, and
Joshua said in the sight of all the people, sun stand thou still upon Gibeon
and thou moon in the valley of Ajalon, until the nation shall have
revenged itself upon its enemies. And the Lord hearkened to the voice of
Joshua, and the sun stood still in the midst of the heavens, and it stood still
thirty six times, and the moon also stood still and hastened not to go down
during the whole day. And there was no day like that before it or after it,
that the Lord hearkened to the voice of a man, for the Lord fought for
Israel.”

Jasher 89:8 says, “The sun and moon stood still in heaven, and Thou
didst stand in thy wrath against our oppressors and didst command thy
judgments over them.”

By commanding that the sun and moon stand still, we know that
they’re both normally moving.

Bible verses proclaim that the sun was moved back, which is not
possible in a heliocentric universe.

2 Kings 20:8-9, 2 Chronicles 32:24-26 and Isaiah 38:4-8; declare that

the sun was moved back, to cause the shadow to move back ten
degrees. If the sun were the center of the universe, it can’t be moved
back, proving that heliocentrism is invalid.

Bible verses declare that the sun rises and knows it’s going down.
Psalms 104:19 says “the sun knoweth his going down.” This is from the
sun’s perspective, not our perspective.

Matthew 5:45 says “for he maketh his sun to rise and sendeth rain.” It
makes no sense to say that one part is just talking about our
perspective, and the other part is literal; “to rise” and “sendeth”
describe the action of the sun and the rain.

There’s no way to justify the heliocentric model based on Scripture,

and there are many verses which point to the geocentric model.
So why do we believe the theories of biased men who won’t
promote a model of the universe that includes a Creator?
Why do we put their teachings above Scripture, when we know
that the enemy seeks to steal glory away from the Creator and
deceive people with the hopeless narrative of evolution?

Though it’s not scientific proof, does it seem like the Earth is
rotating at 1,000 MPH? Does it seem like it’s traveling at 66,600
MPH around the sun? No.

The global sphere of stars with all of the constellations rotates

around the north and south celestial pole stars. Do we imagine that
this celestial sphere of stars is flying through space at 541,700 MPH
and staying in perfect alignment with the earth?

Do we imagine that the Heavenly Father’s throne is flying through

space to stay about the earth?

Science has confirmed that the earth is not moving and that the
earth is the center of the universe.

Scientific studies such as the Airy’s Failure experiment; the

Michelson Morley experiment; the Sagnac experiment and the
Michelson-Gale experiment; proved that the earth is not moving.

Scientific probes point back to the earth as the center of the

universe; and not just to the earth, but they line up with the north-
south pole axis line, the equator line, and the ecliptic line. All of this
proof has been swept under the rug and hidden from people.

Scripture and scientific experiments point to a geocentric, non-

moving earth; so why do people believe otherwise?

Add in that Copernicus submitted his heliocentric model theory

with reluctance, know that it’s absurd; and that Galileo proclaimed
towards the end of his life the falsity of the Copernican system, and
that the earth is immobile and situated in the center of the universe,
with a mobile sun around it.
 CHAPTER 24
Your Conclusion

This conclusion is about what you saw in the explanations.

I asked you to keep an open mind to look at what Scripture is
proclaiming. Are you able to justify a heliocentric universe based
on Scripture? Do you see how the enemy has pushed the
heliocentric model to deceive people with their evolution doctrine?

This is a huge revelation, and we can see why the enemy would
take steps to cover it up; including controlling the scientific
community and pushing the flat earth theory.

Mainstream Christianity has embraced heliocentrism, not because

there’s Scriptural justification, but because men have declared it.
And that’s not good enough since we know that Satan’s mission is
to steal glory from the Creator, to deceive people about the creation,
including the hopeless narrative of evolution which conveys that
people have no value. Christian ministries are promoting a
fallacious cosmology based on man’s reasoning rather than Bible
exegesis.

It’s a hard pill to swallow, to believe that we’ve been misled our
whole life, by Pastors none the less. But the enemy is the master at
controlling the narrative, to manipulate what we learn, and he has
succeeded in pushing the Copernican Principle and heliocentrism.

Please use the book feedback page to share your thoughts.

www.BiblicalGeocentrism.com/feedback

May our Heavenly Father bless you and keep you, as you search
out Scriptural truth!

David
p.s. If this book has helped you see that the Bible describes a
geocentric universe, and that the enemy is deceiving the world with
the heliocentric model; please share it with your family, friends,
Pastor, etc.

We conquer the enemy by exposing their deceptions. If people

understood that the earth is at the center of the universe, then they
would know that the creation narrative of Scripture is valid, and
they would understand that there is a Creator.

We overcome the hopeless narrative of evolution with the truth

about the design of this universe, and the importance of the earth
and every person in the Heavenly Father's creation.

Please don’t share the PDF with others. Instead, you are welcome to
share this link so that people can request their own copy of the PDF.
This lets me know how many people are getting the book.

www.BiblicalGeocentrism.com

I’m not trying to make money with book sales, but if you were
blessed by the book, I would appreciate your support. It helps me
commit my time to writing more studies and books, to help the
saints see Scriptural truth. Thank you!

David
 Geocentricity Books

I’ve given basic overviews of the geocentric view, but these books
provide much more information for you to study.

The Biblical and Observational Case for Geocentricity by J.A.

Moorman

Geocentrism 101: An Introduction into the Science of Geocentric

Cosmology by Robert A. Sungenis, PhD

Geocentrism 102: An Introduction into the History of the Church

versus Galileo by Robert A. Sungenis, PhD

Galileo Was Wrong by Robert A. Sungenis, PhD

In Search of the Beginning – A Seeker’s Journey to the Origin of

the Universe, Life and Man by Dean Davis.

Geocentricity: Christianity in the Woodshed by Gerardus D.

Bouw, Ph.D. The successor to Geocentricity and its predecessor, With
Every Wind of Doctrine.

He Maketh His Sun to Rise: A Look at Biblical Geocentricity, by

Dr. Thomas M. Strouse, Dean of Bible Baptist Theological Seminary

The Bible and Geocentricity, by James N. Hanson, Professor

Emeritus of the Cleveland State University

Fifty Reasons – Copernicus Or The Bible by F.E. Pasche (1915)

 Book References

INTRODUCTION
1 Dr. Al. L. Graebner, Quarterly, VI, 42

CHAPTER 1 – Flat Earth Beliefs Summary

1 Aristotle On the Heavens (2004), 54.

CHAPTER 3 – Believers In Geocentism

1 Exposition of the Christian Faith, Bk V, Ch II
2 Demonstrations, 24
3 Against the Heathen, Book I, Part I
4 Against the Heathen, Bk 1, Part III, 35
5 Why the Christians do not Offer Sacrifices, Ch XIII
6 City of God, Bk XIII, Ch 18
7 City of God, Bk III, Ch 15
8 City of God, Bk XII, Ch 13
9 City of God, Book XXI, Ch 8
10 Tractates, XCI, Ch XV, 24-25, 2
11 Nine Homilies on the Hexameron, 10
12 Twelve Books on the Institutes, Bk XI, Ch X
13 Homilies on Matthew, Homily IV
14 Homilies to Antioch, Homily XII
15 Homily to Antioch, Homily X
16 First Epistle to the Corinthians, Ch XX
17 Pseudo-Clementine, Bk VIII, Ch XLV
18 Catechetical Lectures, II, 15
19 On Admonition and Repentance
20 Oration of Constantine, Ch 1
21 Oration of Constantine, Ch VI
22 Funeral Orations for St. Basil, 66
23 On the Soul and Resurrection
24 On Ecclesiastes, Ch 1, 2
25 Fragments, III, Discourse on Hezekiah
26 Discourse on the Holy Theophany,
27 Against Heresies, Bk I, Ch XVII, 1
28 Against Jovinianus, Bk 2
29 Against the Pelagians, Bk I, 19
30 The Orthodox Faith, Bk 2, Ch 7
CHAPTER 4 – Smoke And Mirrors
1 Kitty Ferguson, Measuring the Universe, 1999, p. 106, 107

CHAPTER 8 – The Three Levels Of Heaven

1 The Biggest Bangs: The Mystery of Gamma-Ray Bursts, pp 90-91

CHAPTER 10 – The Circuit Of The Sun

1 Aristotle Meteorology (350 B.C.), Book II, translated by E. W. Webster

CHAPTER 13 – The Earth Is Fixed

1 Pliny the Elder History, 2, 11. Trans. H. Rackham, Pliny: Natural History,
corrected edition (1949), Vol. 1, 177.
2 Birth of a New Physics, (Norton and Company, 1985), p. 78.
3 The Discovery of Dynamics: A Study from a Machian Point of View, p. 226
4 From Albert Einstein’s Kyoto address “How I created the theory of
relativity,” December 14, 1922.
5 Cited in The Principle Movie
6 A Talk With Lawrence M. Krauss 5 [7.5.06] July 5, 2006
7 The Theory of Relativity, Wolfgang Pauli, p.4
8 From Poincaré’s lecture titled: “L’état actuel et l’avenir de la physique
mathematique,” St.Louis, Sept 24, 1904, Scientific Monthly, April, 1956.

CHAPTER 15 – The Canopy Of Stars

1 http://blog.try-god.org/tag/al-ruccaba/

CHAPTER 18 – Heavenly Intrigue

1 I. Bernard Cohen, Birth of a New Physics, revised and updated, 1985, p. 78

CHAPTER 19 – The Geocentric Earth

1 Albert A. Michelson, “The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous
Ether,” American Journal of Science, Vol. 22, August 1881, p. 125
2 Arthur Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World, 1929, pp. 11
3 The Theory of Relativity, 1958, p. 4
4 Science in History: Volume 3, p. 744, from Jaffe, p.88
5 Historian Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, p. 44.
6 Historian Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, p. 73
7 G.J. Whitrow, The Structure and Evolution of the Universe, 1949, p. 79
8 Bernard Jaffe, Michelson and the Speed of Light, 1960, p.
9 Modern Physics and Antiphysics, p. 54
10 Physicist, Lawrence Krauss "The Energy of Empty Space That Isn't Zero”
11 Y. P. Varshni, “The Red Shift Hypothesis for Quasars: Is the Earth the Center
of the Universe?” Astrophysics and Space Science 43 (1): 3 (1976).
12 Jonathan Katz, The Biggest Bangs, p. 111.
13 The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta,
Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld, 1938, 1966, p. 212.
14 James A. Coleman, Relativity for the Layman, p. 37
15 George Ellis, Scientific American, “Thinking Globally, Acting Universally”
16 Dean Davis, In Search of the Beginning
17 New York Times, July 11, 1935. P. 23, c.8
18 Stephen Hawking, The Grand Design, pages 41-42
19 Stephen Hawking in A Brief History of Time.
20 Relativity — The Special and General Theory, cited in Stephen Hawking's, 'A
Stubbornly Persistent Illusion', 2007, p. 169.
21 Physicist Douglas C. Giancoli, Physics: Principles with Applications, 1985, pp.
613-614 and 1980, p. 625.
22 Galileo Galilei letter to Francesco Rinuccini, March 29th, 1641.
23 The Biggest Bangs: The Mystery of Gamma-ray Bursts, the Most Violent
Explosions in the Universe
24 Arthur S. Otis, Light Velocity and Relativity, p. 58.
25 Steven Weinberg, To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science,
HarperCollins, 2015
26 The Teaching Company, episode taught by Professor Richard Wolfson of
Middlebury College.

CHAPTER 19 – The Jesuit Deception

1 His Life, by Engelhardt, 1856, p. 283.
2 General Montholon, Memorial of the Captivity of Napoleon, pp. 62, 174.
3 Prefaces and prologues to famous books, Volume 39, p. 52
4 Martin Luther, Luther’s Works. Vol 54. Table Talk, (Fortress Press, 1967),
358–9.
5 John Calvin: A Sixteenth-Century Portrait
6 John Calvin’s Verse Commentary, Moorman
7 MacDonnell, Joseph. Companions of Jesuits: A Tradition of Collaboration.
Fairfield, CT: Fairfield University Press, 1995.65.
8 Martin Luther Table Talks: vol. 54; pp. 358-359
9 Thomas S. Huhn, The Copernican Revolution, p. 191.
10 The Methodist Review ..., Volume 48 p. 24
11 How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization, Thomas Woods Jr. p.
111
12 Reuters News Service, Lifestyle October 28, 2014
CHAPTER 21 – The Copernican Shift
1 Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia, by Karl von Gebler, 1879, p. 14.
2 Dr. Andrew White, Warfare, I, 15.
3 Thomas S. Kuhn, The Copernican Revolution, p. 192
4 Freud’s comments to the eulogy, “Darwin and Copernicus,” that du Bois-
Reymond gave in Berlin after Darwin’s death of Darwin in 1882
5 Carl Sagan, in his book titled, “Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future
in Space,” and quoted by Sagan narrating his 1980 Television series titled,
“Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey (Episode 13: “Who Speaks for Earth?”).
6 Robert Sungenis' documentary Journey to the Center of the Universe
7 Historian, Herbert Butterfield These lectures became the foundation for his
book, The Origins of Modern Science
8 Nietzsche's 1882 collection The Gay Science
9 The Winds of War By Herman Wouk

CHAPTER 22 – Believer’s False Science

1 Lehre und Wehre, St. Louis, 1898, p. 334.
2 Fifty Reasons, Copernicus Or the Bible, Frederick Emil Pasche, p. 44
3 R.C. Sproul, “Science, Scripture, and the Age of the Universe” from Ligonier
Ministries.
4 “Geocentricity and Creation,” by Gerald A. Aardsma, Ph.D., Gerald A.
Aardsma, Ph.D. 1994. Geocentricity and Creation. Acts & Facts. 23
5 Why the Universe does not revolve around the Earth - Refuting absolute
geocentrism, Published 12 February 2015
6 Answers In Genesis, Geocentrism and Creation by Dr. Danny R. Faulkner on
August 1, 2001
7 F.E. Pasche (1915), in his book Fifty Reasons – Copernicus Or The Bible
8 Dr. Al. L. Graebner, Quarterly, VI, 42
 David Nikao Websites

DavidNikao.com has links to all of my websites and books.

BiblicalGeocentrism.com – Biblical geocentrism book page.

Book feedback page: BiblicalGeocentrism.com/feedback

FlatEarthDeception.com – This website gives logical explanations

which you can use to prove out the shape of the earth.

David Nikao Prophecy Fulfillment Websites

70thWeekOfDaniel.com - This Bible study series explains the
fulfillment of the 70 weeks of Daniel 9 prophecy, with the focus
being on the 70th week, as it points to Messiah’s first advent.

TheOlivetDiscourse.com - This Bible study series explains how

Messiah’s prophecies in His Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24, Mark
13 and Luke 21, are fulfilled.

RevelationTimelineDecoded.com - This Bible study series explains

the fulfillment of the seals, trumpets, bowls, the little book, the two
witnesses, the antichrist beast, the false prophet, and the harlot who
is called “Mystery, Babylon the Great.”

David Nikao Ministry Websites

RomanCatholicBeliefs.org – This website helps Catholics see how
what the Roman popes and priests teach, is contrary to Scripture,
and it is a false Gospel message.

ComeOutOfHer.org – This website helps everyone see how Roman

christianity has influenced people’s beliefs so that they can come
out of Babylon, as Messiah commanded of us in Revelation 18:4.