The One All Alone and The Posthuman
The One All Alone and The Posthuman
The One All Alone and The Posthuman
by Fred Baitinger|
November 9th, 2019|LRO 190
https://www.thelacanianreviews.com/the-one-all-alone-and-the-posthuman/
Object a, as the object cause of desire, represents what is internally exclude from a
symbolic system, what marks its limit as an extimate remainder. Object a is thus, at once, what
is the most intimate, since it is what causes desire, and what is the most external, since it is what
can neither have an adequate representation, nor be entirely satisfied—except, of course, when
we clumsily try to access it through the Imaginary frame of our fantasy, via the endless chasing
of a virtually infinite chain of substitutable objects. In other word, object a, inasmuch as it
represents what can neither be fully represented nor satisfied, is what can also potentially enslave
us in a desperate search for satisfaction. And it is this very weak spot that capitalism exploits,
trapping us in what Lauren Berlant calls a form of cruel optimism. Through object a, the
capitalist discourse is plugged directly onto our fantasy. And it is through its attempts to fulfill
them with gadgets that the capitalist discourse is actually turning each one of us as consumers
into enslaved workers. To put it in a formula, the harder we are trying to gain satisfaction through
the acquisition of new gadgets, the more we are enslaving ourselves to the very fantasmatic
structure that creates and sustain in the first place our insatiable appetite for satisfaction.
More problematically, one could add that it is precisely to counter the anxiety generated by
this endless search that the capitalist discourse has also invented, through the help of science, a
system of mental health adjusted to its anxious movement. With the help of neuroscience and
medications, or the development of short term cognitive-behavior therapy, exclusively designed
to treat isolated symptom (most of the time related to addictive or phobic behaviors), the
capitalist discourse has invented all sorts of mental treatments for its own disease—the disease of
what Jacques-Alain Miller has called, the One-all-alone, the posthuman. Miller writes, “The
relation between the two sexes is going to become more and more impossible, so that, to put it
this way, the One-all-alone will be the posthuman standard, the One-all-alone, all alone to fill out
questionnaires in order to receive one’s evaluation, and the one-all-alone commanded by a
surplus-jouissance that is presented under its most anxiety generating aspect. (A Fantasy)”
Such is the paradox that lies at the core of the capitalist discourse. While, one the one hand,
it forces its consumers to maintain an anxious relationship to object a, in order for them to keep
consuming new objects of the object palea kind (the object that is replaceable), on the other it
monitors the subject to make sure that, although deprived innerly of any form of castration, its
relationship to pleasure remains nonetheless contained within certain measurable boundaries. In
other words, the capitalist discourse is a discourse that takes object a as its cause, and assign to
the subject a form of “push to jouissance.” And it is also a discourse that controls and limits the
modes of enjoyment of each subject through multiplied medical control procedures. To say it
otherwise, the more the contemporary subject is invited to “enjoy” alone, the more its mode of
enjoyment is being monitored and controlled, and the more the contemporary subject end up
being isolated and segregated. But how can psychoanalysis oppose this movement of scientific
evaluation of the subject,’ while not opposing it in the name of Traditional values, but in the
name of the very impossibility that the discourse of science has discovered when it refused to
abide the social fantasy of inscribing, in one form or another, the sexual link, upon which rests
the social bond.