OBSERN ATIONS
fais]
‘Observations daring SOPM audit done in month of May 2017,
to inadequate supplier.
|:pproved vendors should have validity instead of bl
t approval
fendors. And every vendors evaluation is big task
[Sno. [Deparment [observations [Revert by Auditee [Remark
Jon board vandors has not been evaluated half yearly othe then blacklisted Je can not evaluate all venders with
Jendors, All other vendors who are in approved list may oe may not be lwhome we have not deltin these six
Ihot required as most ofthe vendors are repeated y
ls Jrurchase sustained tne fulfiling criteria and it may Fappen that order sal be issued JNO = months. About sending RFA, we take
he permission from Panel member
before sending the RFQ.
purchase
po/GoPL/e10.KUDIRAK INDIA. PR raised cn 8/09/16 w th Zo°celed diverter
land Flush valve, PO issued date is 3/03/17 without concecles diverter and
flush valve. PR has nat modified
Jo raises with Conceled diverter and Flush Value and
lother cP material would have not been required at
l-ence separate order has been placed for dieverter
land flush valve with other brand and KUDIRAK
Inaterial order placed on 3/3/17 as per site
jrecuirement
Jonly conceled part were required then
iitarty fash valve brand was changed
Jue to pressure rating.
[purchase
|PO/GOPL/€10.KUDIRAKIINDIA. Rate contract has been Tned with Co-
branding with GOPL Logo . However, this 7as been removee item PO
.oecificatcns. No MOM has been shared, Co-branding cancetion evidence
hes not furnished
Jco-branding cancelation has agreed verbally.
Ik was bulking Affenia was stopped.
{sos 2 builsings stopped .Now by the
lime jt required, we had less time,
purchase
[cer meer retards, Avert eee el
lonty approval on mailis sufeient to considered as
Jeporoval
's per SOPM
Js Jurchase
|warranties should be kegaly enforcable, Fowever, the sarse has not beer
lasked through PO clauses.
No Formats a
lable for Warranties
Js |onsracts
Jvo standard format has been followed for RF.
lobservations
[standard format for RFQs to be
Jorepared and shall be made the part
lorsorm
ly |eontracts
Theres no poliey of Peformance gaurantee whether it avd be bank
lzaurantee or corporate gaurantee
Noted for observation
It isas per the discussion in NP
ls [contracts
Revaidaticn of Contractor pre-quaificaticn not been cons fer empanelled
vendors. Trere should 2e prequ
Noted for ebservation
[There is no standard process of
revalidation in the SOPM , However
Revalidation is caried out for the
Jempanelied venders.‘Taskss NC's during SOPM a sdit done in month o° Play 2¢17 [wana
Inediurn
[S.no. [Department [NC's [Severity [Revert from Auditee INC Status,
Repair, Replacement and v suse/Out of thas missed but w le
pWAP |warcanty field are missing r tracker Mie implemented irvnidictaly
List of Warrantes from ve xcors has not found Mechanism necds te =evelop to
zwar [These is no mechanism of e-fectve use of know the warrenty causes of
lwar anty clauses of contra. various contracts from EPC dept
[As por SOPM, ERP systerr will suggest the
lconwactor list for RFQ aftar evaluating the ln case of non CRitems, it isnot rooted
1h ——fourchase —_precualification However. trishasnot been [Mild lsomm needstobechanged through system hence recommonding for
follcwed up and RFAI's ha: Leen send after lsoPm change
lmarval evaluation
Icurrently there is no standard format for|
conta foram warranty has been ret part af Contract incorsorat Ithe warrenty. Now Standard format of
[> (SPRtFE foc ument.t ageds tobe predetired {eissReD ul wil be incoreorated \warrenty shall be made and get it
lapproved for the Part of SOPM,
|actually before sending RFQ, as per the
Irequiremenmt of site , Contracts select
Ithe venders from C1 list & send it to CEEC|
|s [contracts as rarSopM, ERP system wilsuagestthe —— Ild lSoPmneeds tc be zhenged _for appoval. tt may vary project wise &
lcor-ractorlist for RFQ aftr evaluating the lestimated quantum of work. 80 manual
Precualification However tris has aot been selection is preferable . Proposing SOPM
fotcwed up and RFQ's has been send after change.
lmaral evaluation