Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    P17111204047 - Andini Ibriliyanti - 3B - Epiinfo

    Uploaded by

    onlyandin
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing nutritional status (TkKonE) stratified by sex (SEX). It shows that among females, 50% had poor nutritional status, 33.33% had normal status, and 16.67% had very poor status. Among males, the frequencies were similar at 50%, 30%, and 20% respectively. Additional tables examine nutritional status by age and compare nutritional status to another variable (TKPengIbu).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    P17111204047 - Andini Ibriliyanti - 3B - Epiinfo

    Uploaded by

    onlyandin
    13 views7 pages
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing nutritional status (TkKonE) stratified by sex (SEX). It shows that among females, 50% had poor nutritional status, 33.33% had normal status, and 16.67% had very poor status. Among males, the frequencies were similar at 50%, 30%, and 20% respectively. Additional tables examine nutritional status by age and compare nutritional status to another variable (TKPengIbu).

    Original Title

    P17111204047_Andini Ibriliyanti_3B_Epiinfo

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains frequency tables analyzing nutritional status (TkKonE) stratified by sex (SEX). It shows that among females, 50% had poor nutritional status, 33.33% had normal status, and 16.67% had very poor status. Among males, the frequencies were similar at 50%, 30%, and 20% respectively. Additional tables examine nutritional status by age and compare nutritional status to another variable (TKPengIbu).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views7 pages

    P17111204047 - Andini Ibriliyanti - 3B - Epiinfo

    Uploaded by

    onlyandin
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing nutritional status (TkKonE) stratified by sex (SEX). It shows that among females, 50% had poor nutritional status, 33.33% had normal status, and 16.67% had very poor status. Among males, the frequencies were similar at 50%, 30%, and 20% respectively. Additional tables examine nutritional status by age and compare nutritional status to another variable (TKPengIbu).

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 7

    Epi Info

    FREQ PersenKonsE STRATAVAR = SEX

    SEX='F'

    PERSENKONSE Frequency Percent Cum. Percent


    69 3 16,67% 16,67%
    71 1 5,56% 22,22%
    74 1 5,56% 27,78%
    75 1 5,56% 33,33%
    79 2 11,11% 44,44%
    82 1 5,56% 50,00%
    87 1 5,56% 55,56%
    89 2 11,11% 66,67%
    100,5 1 5,56% 72,22%
    100,7 1 5,56% 77,78%
    101 1 5,56% 83,33%
    104 1 5,56% 88,89%
    104,3 1 5,56% 94,44%
    105 1 5,56% 100,00%
    Total 18 100,00% 100,00%

    Exact 95% Conf Limits


    69 3,58% 41,42%
    71 0,14% 27,29%
    74 0,14% 27,29%
    75 0,14% 27,29%
    79 1,38% 34,71%
    82 0,14% 27,29%
    87 0,14% 27,29%
    89 1,38% 34,71%
    100,5 0,14% 27,29%
    100,7 0,14% 27,29%
    101 0,14% 27,29%
    104 0,14% 27,29%
    104,3 0,14% 27,29%
    105 0,14% 27,29%

    SEX='M'

    PERSENKONSE Frequency Percent Cum. Percent


    56 1 10,00% 10,00%
    67 1 10,00% 20,00%
    71 1 10,00% 30,00%
    79 2 20,00% 50,00%
    85 1 10,00% 60,00%
    94 1 10,00% 70,00%
    102 1 10,00% 80,00%
    104 1 10,00% 90,00%
    106 1 10,00% 100,00%
    Total 10 100,00% 100,00%

    Exact 95% Conf Limits


    56 0,25% 44,50%
    67 0,25% 44,50%
    71 0,25% 44,50%
    79 2,52% 55,61%
    85 0,25% 44,50%
    94 0,25% 44,50%
    102 0,25% 44,50%
    104 0,25% 44,50%
    106 0,25% 44,50%
    FREQ TkKonE

    TKKONE Frequency Percent Cum. Percent


    Kurang 14 50,00% 50,00%
    Normal 9 32,14% 82,14%
    Sangat Kurang 5 17,86% 100,00%
    Total 28 100,00% 100,00%

    Exact 95% Conf Limits


    Kurang 30,65% 69,35%
    Normal 15,88% 52,35%
    Sangat Kurang 6,06% 36,89%

    FREQ TkKonE STRATAVAR = SEX

    SEX='F'

    TKKONE Frequency Percent Cum. Percent


    Kurang 9 50,00% 50,00%
    Normal 6 33,33% 83,33%
    Sangat Kurang 3 16,67% 100,00%
    Total 18 100,00% 100,00%

    Exact 95% Conf Limits


    Kurang 26,02% 73,98%
    Normal 13,34% 59,01%
    Sangat Kurang 3,58% 41,42%

    SEX='M'

    TKKONE Frequency Percent Cum. Percent


    Kurang 5 50,00% 50,00%
    Normal 3 30,00% 80,00%
    Sangat Kurang 2 20,00% 100,00%
    Total 10 100,00% 100,00%

    Exact 95% Conf Limits


    Kurang 18,71% 81,29%
    Normal 6,67% 65,25%
    Sangat Kurang 2,52% 55,61%

    FREQ TkKonE

    TKKONE Frequency Percent Cum. Percent


    Kurang 14 50,00% 50,00%
    Normal 9 32,14% 82,14%
    Sangat Kurang 5 17,86% 100,00%
    Total 28 100,00% 100,00%

    Exact 95% Conf Limits


    Kurang 30,65% 69,35%
    Normal 15,88% 52,35%
    Sangat Kurang 6,06% 36,89%

    TABLES TKPengIbu TkKonE

    TkKonE
    TKPENGIBU Kurang Normal Sangat Kurang Total
    Baik 3 3 0 6
    Row% 50,00% 50,00% 0,00% 100,00%
    Col% 21,43% 33,33% 0,00% 21,43%
    Kurang 10 3 5 18
    Row% 55,56% 16,67% 27,78% 100,00%
    Col% 71,43% 33,33% 100,00% 64,29%
    Sedang 1 3 0 4
    Row% 25,00% 75,00% 0,00% 100,00%
    Col% 7,14% 33,33% 0,00% 14,29%
    TOTAL 14 9 5 28
    Row% 50,00% 32,14% 17,86% 100,00%
    Col% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00%

    Single Table Analysis

    Chi-Squared df Probability
    7,6111 4 0,1069

    An expected value is < 1. Chi-squared may not be a valid test.

    TABLES TKE2Kat STGZWAZ2Kat

    STGZWAZ2Kat
    TKE2KAT Gizi Baik Gizi Salah Total
    Cukup 4 5 9
    Row% 44,44% 55,56% 100,00%
    Col% 25,00% 41,67% 32,14%
    Kurang 12 7 19
    Row% 63,16% 36,84% 100,00%
    Col% 75,00% 58,33% 67,86%
    TOTAL 16 12 28
    Row% 57,14% 42,86% 100,00%
    Col% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00%
    Single Table Analysis

    Point 95% Confidence Interval


    Estimate Lower Upper
    PARAMETERS: Odds-based
    Odds Ratio (cross product) 0,4667 0,0931 2,3387 (T)
    Odds Ratio (MLE) 0,4800 0,0862 2,5173 (M)
    0,0685 3,0911 (F)
    PARAMETERS: Risk-based
    Risk Ratio (RR) 0,7037 0,3139 1,5774 (T)
    Risk Difference (RD%) -18,7135 -57,7571 20,3302 (T)

    (T=Taylor series; C=Cornfield; M=Mid-P; F=Fisher Exact)


    Sparse data. Use exact confidence limits.

    STATISTICAL TESTS Chi-square 1-tailed p 2-tailed p


    Chi-square - uncorrected 0,8733 0,3500449060
    Chi-square - Mantel-Haenszel 0,8421 0,3587953580
    Chi-square - corrected (Yates) 0,2763 0,5991262097
    Mid-p exact 0,1942028986
    Fisher exact 0,2985507246 0,4318840580
    At least one cell has expected size

    You might also like