Phytochemical and Antimicrobial Activiti
Phytochemical and Antimicrobial Activiti
Phytochemical and Antimicrobial Activiti
Correspondence Author:
Annika Durve-Gupta
Department of Biotechnology,
BK Birla College Autonomous,
Kalyan, Dist. Thane,
Maharashtra, India Fig 1: Guava fruit
~ 106 ~
International Journal of Applied Research http://www.allresearchjournal.com
Scientific classification: (Maurya et al., 2018) [11] extract was filtered and then subjected to evaporation by
Kingdom: Plantae keeping the flask in boiling water bath to evaporate the
Division: Magnoliophyta entire methanol. The dried residue was scraped and diluted
Class: Magnoliopsida with distilled water. Both the extracts were stored at 4°C
Order: Myrtales until further use (Biswas et al., 2013) [3].
Family: Myrtaceae
Genus: Psidium L. Qualitative analysis of the phytochemical content in the
Species: Psidium guajava L. leaf extract
Binomial name: Psidium guajava L. Phytochemical tests were done for the screening of bioactive
Many parts of the guava tree have been used in traditional compounds in the guava leaves with the help of the extracts
medicine to treat conditions like gastroenteritis, malaria, viz. Flavonoids (Lead Acetate Test), Saponins (Foam Test),
vomiting, diarrhoea, dysentery, ulcers, toothache, cough, Tannins (Ferric Chloride Test), Glycosides, Terpenoids
sore throat, wounds, inflamed gums, etc (Abdelrahim et al., (Salkowski Test), Phenols (Ferric Chloride Test), were
2002; Lutterodt et al., 1992) [1, 10]. The leaves of guava carried out to check the phytochemical constituents present
contain an essential oil rich in cineol, tannins, resin, in the leaf extracts (Biswas et al., 2013) [3].
uquenol, malic acid, fat, terpenoids, cellulose, chlorophyll,
mineral salts and several other fixed substances (Biswas et Test organisms
al., 2013) [3]. One of the many methods in which plants are The MIC and antimicrobial activity of the leaf extracts were
used in traditional remedies is to extract and consume tested against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
essential plant oils (Gonçalves et al., 2008) [6]. These bacterial cultures were procured from the Department
The efficient use of different parts of guava like leaves, of Biotechnology, B. K. Birla College, Kalyan. For regular
seeds and peels may reduce the risk of their disposal as use, the organisms were cultured and maintained on sterile
pollutants since they are treated as wastes by the food Nutrient agar slants and stored in a refrigerator (Harley and
processing industries and eventually discarded. Since all the Prescott, 2002) [7].
parts of the plant have been used for different purposes like
hepatoprotection, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti- Minimum inhibitory concentration
inflammatory, anti-spasmodic, anti-cancer, anti- The minimum concentration of any substance that inhibits
hyperglycemic, analgesic, anti-stomachache, anti-diarrhoea, the growth of the organism is known as the Mininmum
etc and shown to have positive effects on health it should be Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). The MIC of the extracts
researched more extensively (Barbalho et al., 2012) [2]. The was determined for the bacterial isolates viz. E. coli and S.
present study was carried out with an aim to evaluate the aureus. The concentration range of the leaf extracts
effectiveness of the Psidium guajava leaf extracts made (Methanol and Distilled water) were made in the range of 10
using aqueous solvent (distilled water) and organic solvent mg/ml to 100 mg/ml using Sterile plain Nutrient broth as the
(methanol) in inhibiting the growth of Escherichia coli and diluent. 0.1 ml of 24 hours old culture suspension (E. coli
Staphylococcus aureus. and S. aureus) was inoculated in the tubes respectively. A
positive control (Sterile plain nutrient broth inoculated with
2. Materials and methods test organism) and negative control (Sterile plain nutrient
The media components like Nutrient agar and Nutrient broth broth) were also kept. All the tubes were incubated at 37°C
used for this study were procured from Himedia, India. The for 24 hours (Puntawong et al., 2012) [15]. The lowest
chemicals used were of analytical grade. All the chemicals concentration that completely inhibited bacterial growth
and media were made in distilled water. after 24 hours of incubation was determined as the MIC
value of the extract (Nayak et al., 2019) [12].
Preparation of guava leaf powder
The leaf samples were collected from guava trees growing Antimicrobial susceptibility test
in different towns like Kalyan and Ambarnath. Random Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the
fresh leaf samples were collected into plastic bags. The well-diffusion/ agar cup method. In this method, the growth
collected leaf samples were thoroughly washed and sun- response is measured by the zone of inhibition of the test
dried for 24 hours. It was then grounded into a fine powder culture in response to different concentrations of the extract.
using a mixer grinder. The powder was kept in a clean The Sterile molten nutrient agar was seeded with 1ml of the
container and stored in a cool, dry place until further use 24 hours old test culture suspensions and the plates are
(Biswas et al., 2013) [3]. prepared. Wells were made in the solidified media using a
cork borer having an internal diameter of 6mm. The
Preparation of methanolic and aqueous (distilled water) methanolic extract (50 mg/ml for S. aureus and 30 mg/ml
extract for E. coli) and distilled water extract (30 mg/ml for S.
Two different leaf extracts were made, one in distilled water aureus and 20 mg/ml for E. coli) were added to the wells.
using hot water extraction method and the other in These values wewre based on the MIC results obatined.
methanol. The methanolic and aqueous extracts were Gentamicin (50 mg/ml) was used as a control. The plates
prepared in sterile 150 ml conical flask by mixing 10 grams were kept in a refrigerator for 10 minutes for pre-diffusion
of the leaf powder in 100 ml of methanol and boiling after which they were incubated at 370C for 24 hours. The
distilled water, respectively, making the final concentration added extract diffuses away from the well in a decreasing
of the extracts to 100 mg/ml. The flasks were then kept in a concentration gradient so that the susceptibility by the
shaker at 250C for 7 hours at 100 rpm. The aqueous extract seeded organism can be seen. The zone of inhibitions was
was filtered through a muslin cloth and transferred into measured after the incubation period (Khan et al., 2019).
sterile test tubes. In the case of the methanolic extract, the
~ 107 ~
International Journal of Applied Research http://www.allresearchjournal.com
showed MIC in the range of 30-40 mg/ml and 50-60 mg/ml presence of different active compounds present in them.
against E. coli and S. aureus respectively. While distilled Tannins might be the active compound in guava leaves that
water extract showed the result in the range of 20-30 mg/ml can be used to control bacterial resistance to antibiotics. The
and 30-40 mg/ml against E. coli and S. aureus respectively different factors like cropping areas of the herbs, the season,
as shown in Table. 2. Numerous studies have demonstrated extract, and extraction methods may affect the MIC value
that the guava leaf extract could inhibit the growth of E. coli (Chukiatsiri et al., 2019) [4].
with different MIC values. This can be attributed to the
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test molecules (active components) of the solvent extracts may
The antimicrobial activity of the Guava leaves was studied affect the inhibition zone values (Power, 1995) [14]. The
using Agar well diffusion method against two organisms viz. results in this study indicate that the inhibitory activity of
Gram-positive organism (Staphylococcus aureus) and both the extracts was comparatively greater than that of
Gram-negative organism (Escherichia coli). The result Gentamicin. The methanolic extracts of P. guajava leaves
indicated that both the methanolic and aqueous extracts showed significant antibacterial activity against S. aureus
prepared from the leaves of Psidium guajava showed and E. coli. Bacterial cells can be killed by the rupture of
inhibitory activity, indicating the susceptibility of both the cell walls and membrane and by the irregular disruption of
micro-organisms towards the extracts. The methanolic the intracellular matrix when treated with plants extracts
extract with a concentration range of (50 mg/ml) and (Kim and Fung., 2004) [9]. The mesh-like peptidoglycan
distilled water extract with a concentration range of (30 layer of the Gram-positive bacteria is more accessible to the
mg/ml) showed a zone of inhibition of 16 mm in diameter, extracts by permeation. Whereas the resistance of the Gram-
while a zone of inhibition of 20 mm was observed with 50 negative bacteria could be attributed to its cell wall structure
mg/ml of Gentamicin concentration (Antibiotic used as a as they are mostly resistant to plant-origin extracts. An
control) against S. aureus as shown in Fig. 4, Table. 3. effective permeability barrier of the Gram-negative bacteria
Whereas the methanolic extract with a concentration range is comprised of a thin lipopolysaccharide membrane, which
of (30 mg/ml) and distilled water extract with a restricts any penetration. But the P. guajava leaf extracts
concentration range of (20 mg/ml) showed a zone of contain active components which show inhibitory effect
inhibition of 17 mm, while a zone of inhibition of 21 mm against Gram-negative bacterium by penetrating its cell wall
was observed with 50 mg/ml of Gentamicin concentration (Biswas
against E. coli as shown in Fig. 5, Table. 4. The size of the
et al., 2013) [3].
Fig 4: Antimicrobial activity of methanolic, distilled water extract, gentamicin against S. aureus
Fig 5: Antimicrobial activity of methanolic, distilled water extract, gentamicin against E. coli
~ 110 ~