2223 Dis ws10 Ce02 Tasks
2223 Dis ws10 Ce02 Tasks
2223 Dis ws10 Ce02 Tasks
Unit Workshop 10
Tasks
Workshop Task 1
You continue to act for Hamblings Securities Limited in the claim brought by Oscar
Azevado. Shortly before the deadline for the exchange of witness statements you
receive an email from Plectons(Mr Azevado solicitor). You note that it begins, “Dear
Oscar” and states that it attaches a copy of an opinion from a barrister on the merits
of the claim.
You ask your supervising solicitor if you should open the attachment and read
the barrister’s opinion. She tells you to research the answer and meet with her
later to discuss the arguments for and against reading it and your own
conclusion.
The following sets out extracts from the witness statement of David Julian Jowell in
the case of Oscar Azevado v Hamblings Securities Limited
From the extracts provided below, identify any errors or omissions in relation
to the formalities required when drafting a witness statement.
first by quickly identifying the legal principles involved in each error and
omission, and
second (subject to the time allowed by your tutor for the Task) by
reference to the CPR from which the relevant legal principles are
derived.
The facts and matters set out in this statement are within my own knowledge
unless otherwise stated. Where I refer to information supplied by others, the
source of the information is identified.
I first met Oscar Azevado, the Claimant in these proceedings, in 4/xx13. He had
been a customer of the Defendant since 1/xx08 and the opening value of his
portfolio at that time was £5 million. Following my initial meeting with him I sent
him a letter dated 27/4/ xx13 which confirmed my discussion with him.
[Continues….]
Ending
Statement of truth: The facts stated in this witness statement are true as far as I
know.
………………………………………..
David Jowell
FOR THIS TASK ONLY you are a Trainee in Plectons, the firm acting for Oscar
Azevado.
A first draft of the witness statement of Oscar Azevado is prepared. It contains the
following statements.
That’s relevant
Its admissible if notice is given
6) David Jowell is incompetent.
Not relevant that’s pure opinion but case would be different if there were some
examples and there is no other way of finding the fact then opinion will be
admissible
So this is not admissible
7) When I complained to David Jowell about the purchase of the bonds from Brazil
he told me that they had been purchased on my instructions, which was not
true.
Its relevant
Consider each of the statements above and decide which would be admissible
in evidence at trial (and so should remain in the witness statement) and which
would not be admissible (and so should be removed). You must have reasons
for your answers.
Identify which of the following statements concerning experts are TRUE and
which are FALSE. Ensure that you can briefly explain each answer.
1. Experts owe a duty to exercise reasonable skill and care to those instructing
them. True. section 13 SGSA 1982
2. An expert may be the employee of one of the parties. True. See field v Leeds
city council
3. An expert should not assume the role of an advocate. True. Appendix A21