English

‫جامعة التكوين المتواصل‬
‫جامعة سيدي بلعباس‬

‫تخصص محاسبة و مالية‬
‫سنة أولى ليسانس‬
53 ‫الفوج ج‬ ‫ رشيد‬:‫االسم‬
1 ‫الفرض‬ ‫ جبور‬:‫اللقب‬
‫ االنجليزية‬:‫مقياس‬
Key similarities and differences between GAAP and IFRS
GAAP
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are a set of
accounting standards that have been developed and adopted by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the United
States. GAAP is primarily used in the United States, but it is also
accepted in many other countries.
GAAP is based on a set of fundamental principles, including:
 Accrual accounting: Financial transactions are recorded when they

occur, not when cash is received or paid.
 Matching principle: Expenses are matched with the revenues they
generate.
 Going concern: It is assumed that the company will continue to
operate in the foreseeable future.
 Fair presentation: Financial statements are presented in a fair and
complete manner.
IFRS
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are a set of
accounting standards that have been developed and adopted by
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). IFRS is
primarily used outside of the United States, but it is also accepted
in many other countries, including the United Kingdom, China, and
India.
IFRS is based on a set of fundamental principles, including:
 Recognition and measurement: Assets, liabilities, income, and

expenses are recognized when their conditions arise. Assets,
liabilities, income, and expenses are measured using either cost or
fair value basis.
 Matching principle: Financial transactions are recorded in the
books of both parties involved.
 Conservatism principle: Expenses are recognized when they
occur, even if cash is not received or paid.
 Fair presentation: Financial statements are presented in a fair and
complete manner.
Similarities:
 Underlying Accounting Principles: Both GAAP and IFRS share the
fundamental principles of accrual accounting, matching principle,
going concern, and fair presentation. This means they both aim to
provide a true and fair view of a company's financial position and
performance.
 Financial Statement Structure: Both frameworks follow a similar

structure for financial statements, including the balance sheet,
income statement, cash flow statement, and notes to the financial
statements. This allows for easier comparison between companies
using different accounting standards.
 Recognition and Measurement Principles: Both GAAP and IFRS

have similar concepts regarding the recognition and measurement
of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, and expenses. They generally
agree on the criteria for when to recognize an item in the financial
statements and the basis for measuring its value.
Differences:
 Approach: GAAP is primarily rules-based, with detailed
pronouncements and interpretations that companies must follow.
IFRS is more principles-based, focusing on broad principles with
less specific guidance, requiring professional judgment in applying
them.
 Disclosure Requirements: GAAP generally requires more detailed

disclosures than IFRS. This can include additional information
about specific accounting policies, risks, and uncertainties.
 Specific Accounting Treatments: Several areas differ between the

two frameworks in terms of specific accounting treatments.
Examples include:
o Revenue Recognition: IFRS generally allows for earlier

recognition of revenue in certain situations compared to
GAAP.
o Leases: IFRS capitalizes most leases, while GAAP allows for

different accounting treatments depending on the lease
type.
o Intangibles: IFRS has a more comprehensive framework for

accounting for intangible assets than GAAP.
Additional Points:
 Convergence Efforts: Both standard-setting bodies have been

working towards convergence, aiming to reduce the differences
between GAAP and IFRS over time.
 Adoption: Over 140 countries have adopted IFRS as their national

accounting standards, while GAAP is primarily used in the US.
Conclusion:
GAAP and IFRS are two important frameworks for financial reporting.
The frameworks share some similarities, but there are also some key
differences. The differences in approach, disclosure requirements, and
specific accounting treatments can have a significant impact on the
financial statements of companies using different frameworks.
As I mentioned previously, all of the options you listed are

beneficial reasons for high-quality international accounting
standards:
1. Improved comparability of financial statements across different

countries: This allows for easier comparison of companies
operating in different jurisdictions by investors and analysts,
leading to better-informed investment decisions and improved
market efficiency.
2. Increased investor confidence in global markets: Consistent and
reliable financial information reduces uncertainty and encourages
investment in international markets, boosting liquidity and
economic growth.
3. Reduced cost of capital for multinational companies: Standardized
accounting practices simplify compliance and reporting processes,
reducing administrative burdens associated with operating in
multiple countries. This can translate into lower borrowing costs for
multinational corporations.
4. Enhanced transparency and accountability of corporate
reporting: Robust international standards ensure consistent and
accurate financial reporting, promoting good corporate governance
and holding companies accountable to stakeholders, including
investors, employees, and regulators.
Therefore, it's not about choosing the "best" reason, but rather
recognizing that all four reasons contribute to the overall
advantages of high-quality international accounting standards.
They work together to create a more efficient, transparent, and
trustworthy global financial system.
If you're interested in learning more about specific benefits of high-

quality international accounting standards, I can provide additional
information on any of the options you listed above. Just let me
know which one you'd like to know more about!

English

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

English

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

English

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

‫جامعة التكوين المتواصل‬

‫جامعة سيدي بلعباس‬

Key similarities and differences between GAAP and IFRS

GAAP is based on a set of fundamental principles, including:

 Accrual accounting: Financial transactions are recorded when they

IFRS is based on a set of fundamental principles, including:

 Recognition and measurement: Assets, liabilities, income, and

 Financial Statement Structure: Both frameworks follow a similar

 Recognition and Measurement Principles: Both GAAP and IFRS

 Disclosure Requirements: GAAP generally requires more detailed

 Specific Accounting Treatments: Several areas differ between the

o Revenue Recognition: IFRS generally allows for earlier

o Leases: IFRS capitalizes most leases, while GAAP allows for

o Intangibles: IFRS has a more comprehensive framework for

 Convergence Efforts: Both standard-setting bodies have been

 Adoption: Over 140 countries have adopted IFRS as their national

As I mentioned previously, all of the options you listed are

1. Improved comparability of financial statements across different

If you're interested in learning more about specific benefits of high-

You might also like