Pre Spanish Era
Pre Spanish Era
Pre Spanish Era
I. Introduction (Joffer)
According to the various periods in the political history of the country: the
pre-Spanish period (pre 1521); the Spanish regime (1521-1898); the
Philippine Republic of 1898; the American regime (1898-1935); the
Commonwealth era (1935-1946); the Japanese occupation (1941-1944);
the Period of the Republic (1946-1972); the Martial Law Period (1972-
1986); and the continuation of the Republic.
IV.
2.) A lazy person shall be arrested and sold as a slave to work in the fields.
3.) When a slave becomes industrious and an able worker, the purchase
money shall be returned to his purchaser and the slave shall be freed to fill
his own land.
4.) When a man, after gaining his freedom, again becomes lazy and
improvident he shall be rearrested and thrown into the deepest forest to
keep him from associating with his own people.
5.) Theft and reaping plants grown and cultivated by others shall be
severely punished and the person found guilty shall have his fingers cut.
7.) Poor persons shall not have more than two children. Children of the
poor in excess of two in number, shall be killed or thrown to swift river.
8.) The authorities shall arrest a man who dishonors a woman, runs away
and does not marry her.
9.) If the man is not found, the illegitimate child shall be killed and they shall
both be buried in one grave.
10.) Parents shall no longer take of their children who beget illegitimate
children.
Marco was a prolific writer on the history of the Philippines, although his
work was rife with errors and outright fabrications. Nevertheless,
throughout the 20th century many scholars in both the Philippines and
the United States accepted Marco’s precolonial “source materials” at face
value. Chief among these was the Code of Kalantiyaw, which listed 18
orders for the proper punishment of certain moral and social
transgressions. Depending on the gravity of the offense, punishment
ranged from a light fine to being cut to pieces and thrown to crocodiles. As
early as the 1960s, historians began to question the validity of the code, but
many Filipinos continued to regard it as an important legal document.
Nonetheless, in 2004 the National Historical Institute (now the National
Historical Commission of the Philippines) declared the Code of Kalantiyaw
to be a hoax perpetrated in the early 20th century.
1. Both the society and families were considered hierarchy Datu- Chief
Timawa- Freemen Maharlika- Noble Alipin- Slave
• Filipinos already had their own laws and justice system that are found
similar to one another despite the independency of Barangays.
Civil Disputes
Criminal Cases
• Equal number of witnesses = split the amount they claimed in the suit;
• and the defendant will be either cleared from the case or pay for the full
amount.
• The judges and the successful litigant was also paid the same way as the
witnesses does. • If the Court was in doubt of whom among the litigants
shall be held guilty, it will resort to trial by ordeal especially in criminal
cases where they believed that God supervises the innocent, thus, He shall
protect him and punish the guilty.
An example of a “hot water ordeal” in the Ifugao culture, early 20th century.
Source: Ifugao Law (In American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 15, No.
1)
• The dispute will be settled if both parties accepted the judgement, if not,
warfare could be the result.