Paratransit Public Transport Satisfaction Level of Common People: Hyderabad City, Pakistan
Paratransit Public Transport Satisfaction Level of Common People: Hyderabad City, Pakistan
Paratransit Public Transport Satisfaction Level of Common People: Hyderabad City, Pakistan
net/publication/338152337
CITATIONS READS
0 235
5 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur on 11 February 2020.
SINDHUNIVERSITYRESEARCHJOURNAL(SCIENCE SERIES)
Paratransit Public Transport Satisfaction Level of Common People: Hyderabad city, Pakistan
F. BAIG++, M.A.H. TALPUR++**, I. A. CHANDIO**, M. G. BHELLAR**, R. B. KHOSO**
Department of City and Regional Planning, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro
Received 25th October 2018 and Revised 14th September 2019
Abstract: Public transport including formal and informal (Paratransit) transport plays an important role in all major cities throughout
the world. One of the important issue regarding this type of transport is passenger’s satisfaction. In context of Pakistan, only few
studies were conducted on the satisfaction studies regarding public transport. Furthermore, quality of public transport service as per
consumers’ desires is an important issue nowadays. This study aims to assess the citizen’s perceived satisfaction regarding the quality
of Paratransit public transport as well as to provide guidelines in order to improve the conditions of transportation system. Sample size
for the present study was selected as 384 and an online questionnaire survey methodology with simple random sampling was implied
to collect the desired data. Respondents filled Likert-scale based questions focusing demographics of the area, and R programming
associated with R studio utilized for data analysis. In addition, statistical correlation was also implied to describe the relationship of
various factors on overall public transport satisfaction level of people. Study is significant in terms of indicating the alarming situation
of public transport in Hyderabad city and providing the public transport satisfaction related statistics, which allows policy planners to
make the transport policies as per public interest.
1. INTRODUCTION (Imran, 2010). Despite fair and route control, this public
Transportation systems play a key role in order to transport system needs some quality assessments of
promote the sustainable development (Miller, et al., various transport modes (Mini Buses, Suzuki Pick-ups,
2013; Zou, et al.,2014). Rapid urbanization and and Auto-Rickshaws) used on the basis of public
population growth in urban areas emphasis to look upon perception (Javid, et al., 2013). This study intends to
the provision of adequate public transport so that urban assess the public satisfaction about the available
transportation problems can be resolved (Olayiwola, transportation services, which may provide guidelines to
et al., 2014). Nonetheless, the transport facilities should help the improvement of the current transportation
be given according to the demands of the travelers, thus system. The research aimed 1) to determine the public
transportation planners and policy makers should satisfaction regarding the overall performance of public
incorporate the knowledge of the overall quality of transport services 2) to identify the most influencing
public transport perceived by the citizens. (Nyongesa indicators of the public perceived satisfaction regarding
et al.,2014;Le-Klahn, et al., 2014). In addition, the public transport services. The present research is
increase of investment towards public transportation imperative in a sense that, it determines the overall user
also increases the trends of measuring satisfaction satisfaction with available public transport facilities and
regarding the performance of public transport (Friman highlights the significant indicators influencing the
and Fellesson, 2009).For the third world countries, people satisfaction level in order to provide guidelines
public transport services considered of two forms, to the Public transport service providers, i.e.
formal public transport services which include rails and government, policymakers and the private sector.
buses; informal public transport services which
includeminibusses, vans, taxis, suzukis, and auto- 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
rickshaws (Kumar, et al., 2016). In developing The former capital of province Sindh Pakistan,
countries, a major proportion of people, especially the which is known as Hyderabad city, was selected as a
low-income people, pre dominantly rely on such formal study area for this research (Talpur, et al., 2017). It is
and informal (Paratransit) transport services (Rahman, crowded by 1,732,693 inhabitants and considered as one
et al., 2017). In Pakistan, public transport is usually of the major city among the top 10 cities of Pakistan
provided by the private operators and the government (Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Government of Pakistan,
plays a role to control fares and routes. Private operators 2017). It has a land share of about 300 square
prefer the usage of small vehicles, like Mini Buses, kilometers(Talpur, et al., 2016) and lies between 25° 22′
Auto-Rickshaws, etc, and contribute to maximizing the 45″ North and 68° 22′ 6″ east on the globe (Mahesar,
informal public transport services for the commuters et al., 2017). The geographical location of Hyderabad
++
Corresponding Authors: Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
++
Department of Transportation and Logistics, Dalian University of Technology, China
++
**Department of City and Regional Planning, MUET Jamshoro Sindh.
F. BAIG, et al., 682
Sindh, Pakistan can be seen in (Fig. 1.) which was and also constantly being updated with the most current
prepared with the help of Arc GIS software. functions by the strong community of researchers
around the world (Shaffer, et al., 2008). In order to deal
with R programming language in a more efficient way,
R-studio software is also common among research
analysts and statisticians. R studio is an open source
integrated development environment (IDE) application
for the user, which is also available as “Open source
(Kshirsagar, 2016). For the data analysis of present
research, the available latest version of R software
package accompanied with R-studio was downloaded
from www.r-project.org/ and www.rstudio.com/
respectively. The important Programming commands
used for analyzing the data can be seen in (Fig. 2.).
than or equal to Rs. 20,000, 25.5% respondent’s 1.72, and Physical conditions of vehicle (PC) was
monthly income Rs. 21,000-30,000, 21.1% Respondents recorded 1.63 at the same time. Access to Routes and
earning lies in between Rs. 31,000-40,000 and only schedule info rmation (RSI) and Walking time to access
12.3% monthly income more than Rs. 40,000 stop (WTS) scored same as 1.84. Besides, mean score
(Table. 1). value for Ticket and fare collection system (TFS) was
By using R programming, Mean scores for all the scored 1.88 and overall mean satisfaction value for
indicators of Paratransit public transport satisfaction Paratransit public transport was recorded as 1.65 which
were determined and arranged in (Table 2) is very low.
accompanied with the frequency of respondents as per
the given specified grading from ‘1’ to ‘5’. Score for
Table 1. Satisfaction level of respondents regarding Paratransit Public transport modes
According to (Table 2.) the least mean score value The results of correlation were also obtained from
about the satisfaction level of respondents is 1.50 for R programming and presented in (Table.3) which
Physical conditions of public transport stops (PCPTS) indicates that OP has a strong relation with TTR, and
indicating the lack of maintenance of public transport has a moderate correlation with rest of the indicators.
stops by concern agencies. Besides this, the highest Results indicating the need of immediate action to
satisfaction level was found 2.15 for Travel cost (fare)- improve the Travel time reliability (TTR), Safety and
(TC) indicator. Instead, it is the highest mean score security at stop and traveling (SS) Comfort level
value but it still cannot be considered as almost satisfied (comfort) Physical conditions of vehicle (PC) Access to
value because the score was based on five points Likert- Routes and schedule information (RSI) and Physical
scale. The interesting fact found in the present study conditions of public transport stops (PCPTS). The
was all mean score values were below the satisfaction strongly correlated indicators were found as the most
level indicating the poor management of para-transit influenced indictors, which effectively influence the
public transport services. Based on respondent’s grades, level of satisfaction of passengers.
the mean score value for Route coverage (RC) is came
out 1.97, whereas, mean score value for Punctuality of 4. CONCLUSION
service (PS) was calculated as 1.79. The respondents The study is a milestone in ongoing research
respond for Travel time reliability (TTR) as 1.77score, because it includes the utilization of a modern tool of
and respond for Frequency of service (FS)estimated as statistical analysis ‘R programming’ in order to provide
1.93. However, mean score value for Crew attitude significant results for future policy frame works. Results
(driver and conductor)-(CA) was derived as 2.04, and obtained from the analysis proved that all indicators of
Safety and security at stop and traveling (SS) was SS, the presenter search had a positive correlation with over
COMFORT, CL, PC, RSI, and PCPTS. Instead, all public transport satisfaction. Among all these
OPscored 1.73. Moreover, the mean value score for dimensions, travel time reliability, safety and security at
waiting time at Bus/Suzuki Stop (WTBZS) was 1.77, stop, comfort level, convenience level, physical
and the Comfort level (comfort) of respondents was condition of vehicle, access to route and schedule
1.66. Furthermore, Convenience level (CL) score was information and physical condition of public transport
F. BAIG, et al., 684
COMF
O RC PS TTR FS TC CA SS WTBZS ORT CL PC RSI WTS TFS PCPTS
P 0.477 0.499 0.516 0.404 0.446 0.485 0.573 0.407 0.54 0.573 0.642 0.516 0.452 0.411 0.692
Pearson Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
stops showed a strong correlation and considered as the Javid, M. A., T. Okamura, F. Nakamura, and R. Wang,
most influencing factor regarding the overall public (2013). Comparison of Commuters Satisfaction and
transport satisfaction level. In order to reduce the Preferences with Public Transport : A Case of Wagon
passenger shift for public transport to private transport, Service in Lahore, 7(4), 461–472.
improvement of public transport services is needed.
Present study indicated the alarming situation of public Kshirsagar, P. (2016). R : An Emerging Statistical Data
transport and results showed that public transport Mining Tool, (Rtdm).
facilities in Hyderabad is far left behind in terms of Kumar, M., S. Singh, A.T. Ghate, S. Pal, and S.A.
service quality. Wilson, (2016). Informal public transport modes in
India: A case study of fi ve city regions. IATSSR, 39(2),
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 102–109.
The authors are indebted to respondents who https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.01.001
voluntarily take part in the present research.
Lai, W. T., and C. F. Chen, (2011). Behavioral
REFERENCES: intentions of public transit passengers-The roles of
Bachok, S., Z.. Ponrahono, M. M. Osman, S. Jaafar, M. service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and
Ibrahim, and M. Z. Mohamed, (2015). A preliminary involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318–325.
study of sustainable transport indicators in Malaysia : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003
the case study of Klang valley public transportation,
28(SustaiN2014),464– Le-Klahn, D.T., M. Hall, and R. Gerike, (2014).
473.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.056 Analysis of Visitor Satisfaction with Public Transport in
Munich. Journal of Public Transport, 17(3), 68–85.
Beaumont, R. (2012). An introduction to Principal https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.17.3.5
Component Analysis & Factor Analysis Using SPSS 19
and R (psych package). Journal of Geophysical Mahesar, P. N., I. A. Chandio, M. A. H. Talpur, and
Research, (April), 24. Retrieved from P. I.Memon, (2017). City Planning Indicators for
http://www.floppybunny.org/robin/web/virtualclassroo Evaluating the Residential Satisfaction : A Case on
m/stats/statistics2/pca1.pdf Hyderabad, Pakistan. Sindh University Research
Journal (Science Series), 49(2).
Bewick, V., L. Cheek, andJ. Ball, (2003). Statistics
review 7: Correlation and regression. Critical Care, 7(6), Miller, H., F.Witlox, and C. P. Tribby, (2013).
451. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2401 Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for
transportation planning : A measurement framework.
Friman, M., andM. Fellesson, (2009). Service Supply Journal of Transport Geography, 26(February 2016).
and Customer Satisfaction in Public Transportation : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.007
The Quality Paradox. Journal of Public Transportation, Morton, C., B. Caulfield, and J. Anable, (2016).
12(4), 57–69. Customer perceptions of quality of service in public
transport: Evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case
Imam, R. (2014). Measuring Public Transport Studies on Transport Policy, 4(3), 199–207.
Satisfaction from User Surveys. International Journal, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.03.002
9(6).
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n6p106 Nyongesa D.,M. Murambi, andP. H. Bwisa, (2014).
Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in Public
Imran, M. (2010). Sustainable Urban Transport in Transport Sector of Kenya: A Survey of Shuttle
Pakistan: An Institutional Analysis. International Travelers in Kitale Terminus. International Journal of
Planning Studies, 15(2), 119–141. Academic Research 4(9), 402–412.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2010.490668 https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i9/1167
Paratransit Public Transport Satisfaction Level… 685
Olayiwola, K. O., A. M. Olaseni, and O Fashina, Talpur, M. A. H., I. A. Chandio, F. Baig, F. Shaikh, and
(2014). Traffic Congestion Problems in Central M. Napiah, (2017). Energy Crisis and Household’s
Business District (CBD) Ikeja, Lagos Metropolis, Perception about Solar Energy Acceptance: District
Nigeria. Research on Humanities 4(1), 23–32. Hyderabad, Pakistan. Sindh University Research
Journal(Science Series), 49(3), 601–604.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Goverment of Pakistan.
(2017). Population of major cities census - 2017
population top 10 cities. Retrieved from Talpur, M. A. H., I. A. Chandio, M.S. Jumani, and
http://www.pbscensus.gov.pk/ M. Napiah, (2016). Planning Information System for
Rural Transport Planning Agencies. Sindh Univ. Res.
Rahman, F., M. F. Haque, M. T. Ehsan, S. M. M. Jour. (Sci. Ser.), 48(1), 67–70.
Rahman, andM. Hadiuzzaman, (2017). Determination
of Users’ Perception of Paratransit Service Quality in Wong, R. C. P., W.Y. Szeto, L. Yang, Y.C. Li, and
Dhaka City Based on Users Perception. International S. C. Wong, (2017). Elderly users’ level of satisfaction
Journal of Education And Applied Research, 33, 19–24. with public transport services in a high-density and
Sabir, R. I., S. Javed, w. Ahmad, N. Noor, and H.M. transit-oriented city. Journal of Transport and Health,
Munir, (2014). Assessing Customer Satisfaction Level (7th November 2016), 209–217.
of Transport Services Using Servqual : A Case of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.004
Daewoo Express, Pakistan. Journal of Basic Applied
Science Research, 4(2), 207–213. Zou, L., H. Dai, E. Yao, T. Jiang, and H. Guo, (2014).
Shaffer, L. B., T. M. Young, M. Franck, H. Bensmail, Research on Assessment Methods for Urban Public
andR.V. León, (2008). Using R software for reliability Transport Development in China. Computational
data analysis. International Journal of Reliability and Intelligence and Neuroscience, 1–8.
Application, 91(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/941347