Solution Chapter 11 Afar by Dayag Compress
Solution Chapter 11 Afar by Dayag Compress
Solution Chapter 11 Afar by Dayag Compress
Problem I
1.
• Contributions of cash by the operators
Cash 360,000
KK Company 180,000
Cerise Company 180,000
Contribution by joint operators.
• Use of cash and loan to buy machinery & equipment and raw materials
Machinery and equipment 96,000
Cash 60,000
Loans payable – machinery and equipment 36,000
Contribution by joint operators.
Materials 78,000
Accounts payable 78,000
Acquisition of materials.
• Labor incurrence
Payroll 86,400
Cash 84,000
Accrued payroll 2,400
Annual labor.
Work-in-process 309,600
Payroll 86,400
Materials 57,600
Factory overhead control – heat, light and power 156,000
Factory overhead control – depreciation 9,600
Allocation of costs to work-in-process
2.
Cash
Contribution – Drei 60,000 Machinery and equipment
Work-in-Process
180,000
Labor
Contribution – Cerise 216,000
84,000 Laborto Finished Goods
86,400
180,000
Materials
Bank loan 12,000 Machinery and equipment
57,600
60,000
Factory Overhead – heat, etc. 50,400 Accounts payable
156,000 156,000 Factory overhead control
Factory
Balance,Overhead
12/31/x4 – depreciation
9,600
57,600
Balance, 12/31/x4
93,600
3.
a. Total assets, P282,000
b. KK’s investment, P84,000
c. DD’s investment, P84,000
December 31, 20x4
Assets
Current Assets
Cash P 57,600
Finished goods inventory 24,000
Work-in-Process inventory 93,600
Materials inventory 20,400
Total current assets P 195,600
Non-current Assets
Equipment P 96,000
Less: Accumulated depreciation 9,600 86,400
Total Assets P282,000
Problem II
1. Ayala Corp. shall account for its interest in the joint operation as follows:
2. The assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses are recognized and combined with those of
Ayala’s own financial statements. The interest in joint operations at the end of the
reporting period is reduced to P228,000, computed as follows:
Problem III
1. The joint operator, Entity A account for their interests in the joint operation as follows:
Entity X—in 20x4
Cash 8,400,000
Profit or loss (construction revenue) 8,400,000
To recognize the construction costs incurred in 20x4
Cash 8,400,000
Profit or loss (construction revenue) 8,400,000
To recognize the construction costs incurred in 20x4
Problem IV
The joint operator, Entity K account for their interests in the joint operation as follows:
In 20x4
Cash 12,000
Profit or loss (rental income) 12,000
To recognize income earned in renting to others the use
of the aircraft in 20x4.
Problem V
1. The following are the summaries of the above transactions for a joint operation in the
form of a partnership:
Investment in
Event Joint Operation AA BB CC
Dr. Cr. Dr. Cr. Dr. Cr. Dr. Cr.
a. P 12,000 P12,000
b. 120,000 120,000
P
6,000 6,000
c. 180,000 120,000 P60,000
d. P588,000 P204,000 P312,000 P72,000
e. 3,600 3,600 3,600 10,800
6,000 6,000
f. * ________ ___3,000 ___3,000 ________ ________ ______ _______ _______
P
P318,000 P597,000 P210,600 P252,000 P315,600 P 60,000 P81,600 16,800
NI** _297,000 ________ ________ __112,200 ________ _147,000 _______ 31,800
P597,000 P597,000 P210,600 P364,200 P315,600 P195,000 P81,600 P48,600
Cash**
*
Settle-
ment _______ ________ _153,600 ________ ________ _120,600 _______ _33,000
Totals P597,000 P597,000 P364,200 P364,200 P315,600 P315,600 P81,600 P81,600
* purchases, P300,000; cost of goods sold, P294,000; ending inventory P6,000 x 50% =
P3,000.
2. The cash settlement entry (refer to No. 1 for the computation of settlement) would be as
follows:
AA, capital 153,600
BB, capital 120,600
CC, capital 33,000
Therefore, BB will pay P120,600 and CC will pay, P33,000 to AA as final settlement for the
joint operations.
Problem VI
Schedule of Determination and Allocation of Excess
The following are entries recorded by the parent in 20x4 in relation to its investment in joint
venture:
January 1, 20x4:
(1) Investment in DD Company 2,016,000
Cash 2,016,000
Acquired 30% joint control in DD Company.
Thus, the investment balance and investment income in the books of TT Company is as
follows:
Investment Income
Amortization NI of Son
46,800
432,000 (P1,440,000 x 30%)
385,200 Balance, 12/31/x4
Books of Y
Inv. in JO Y. capital
Books of Z
Inv. in JO Z, capital
2,500 6,500
4,000
6,500
2.
Total credits - Investment in Joint Operations…………………………………P 25,810
Total debits - Investment in Joint Operations…………………………………. 19,750
Net income or total gain (credit balance)…………………………………….P 6,060
3. d
Jose, capital
8,500 investment
1,212 share in net income (P6,060 x
2/10)
9,712
4. a – The 20,000 shares should be valued at market value, thus, P800,000 (20,000 shares
x P40 per share)
5. b
Jose, capital
20,000 shares at P40/share P 198,000 (4,500 x P44) – Sales
P800,000
Expenses 125,000 (5,000 x P25)
3,000
13,600* (13,600 x P1) - Cash dividend
4,700
168,000 (6,000 x P28) - Sales
266,000 (7,600 x P35)
P807,700 P 770,600
Joint operation loss P
37,100
*
9/30 Shares issued (6,000 + 10,000 + 4,000) 20,000
10/20 Sold (4,500)
11/ 1 Stock dividend (20,000 – 4,500) x 20% 3,100
11/15 Sold (5,000)
Balance of shares outstanding before cash dividend 13,600
6. c
Investment in Joint Operations
Share in net loss P400,000 Investment (10,000 shares x
P40)
P37,100 x (10,000/20,000)
P18,550
P381,450
7. b
Unrealized loss due to decline in the value of shares at the time of
investment P68,000
(P62 – P40) x 4,000 shares
Share in joint operation (P37,100 x 4/20) __7,420
Reduction of loss by cash dividend (P13,600 x 4/20) P98,140
8. a
Investment in Joint Operations
before net income or loss 15,000 25,000 ending inventory
10,000 net income
10. a
Joint Operations Anson, Capital
Purchases 20,000 77,000 Sales (?) Unsold merchandise 600 20,000
Contr/Invest 20,000 18,600
Profit(50%)
Expenses 800
1,800 600 38,600
12. a
Investment in Joint Operations Santo, capital
Purchases 7,200 sales 10,000 Contribution/Invest
10,000
Freight-in 5,120 unsold 910 Share in NI
240
Freight-out (P10,000 + P240) x
260 1/2
10, 12,320 10,910
500
1,820
14. c
Investment in Joint Operations
before sale 3,500 Sales
6,500
Net loss
3,000
N, capital O, capital
1, 14,500 1, 6,500
100 100
13,400 5,400
Distribution of Loss:
M N O Total
Salary P 300 P - P - P 300
Balance, equally (1,100) (1,100) (1,100) (3,300)
P ( 900) P(1,100) P(1,100) P(3,000)
16. a
18. b
Investment in Joint Operations
Purchases 800 sales
950
Expenses 600
150
1,400
1,100
300 Net income
21. b
Revenues
Total cash receipts (P78,920 + P65,245) P144,345
Less: Cash investments (P30,000 + P20,000) 50,000
Cash sales P 94,345
Add: Proceeds from sale of remaining assets 60,000
Total Revenue P154,345
Less: Expenses (P62,275 + P70,695) 132,970
Net income P 21,375
22. c
Benin, capital Sucat, capital
Receipts 30,000 Contribution Receipts 20,000 Contribution
78,920 65,425
62,275 Disbursement 70,695 Disbursement
12,825 Share in NI (3/5) 8,550 Share in NI
(2/5)
78, 105,100 65, 99,245
920 425
26,180 33,820
23. d
N’s books: it shows P5,000 receivable from P, and P3,000 payable to O; thus, N should
receive net cash of P2,000:
O, capital 3,000
Cash 2,000
P, capital 5,000
O’s books: it shows P5,000 receivable from P, and P2,000 payable to N; thus, O should
receive net cash of P3,000:
N, capital 2,000
Cash 3,000
P, capital 5,000
P’s books: it shows P2,000 payable to N and P3,000 payable to O; thus, in final
settlement, P should pay a total of P5,000; P2,000 and P3,000 to N and O, respectively:
N, capital 2,000
O, capital 3,000
Cash 5,000
24.
The Investment in Basket Co. as of December 31 is as follows:
Acquisition cost, January 1, 2013 P 500,000
Add (deduct):
Share in net income (P90,000 x 40%]
36,000
Share in dividends (P30,000 x 40%) ( 12,000)
Amortization of allocated excess ( 16,400)
Investment balance on December 31 P 507,600
Cost of investment P 500,000
Less: Book value of interest acquired [40% x (P1,400,000 – P500,000)] 360,000
Allocated excess P 140,000
Less: Over/undervaluation of assets and liabilities:
Increase in building (P140,000 x 40%)
56,000
Increase in trademark (P210,000 x 40)
84,000
25. b
The joint arrangement is a joint venture because it needs unanimous consent to all
parties involved. The parties recognize their rights to the net assets of Harrison Company
as investments and account for them using the equity method.
28. d
To determine whether a contractual arrangement gives parties control of an arrangement
collectively, it is necessary first to identify the relevant activities of that arrangement.
That is, what are the activities that significantly affect the returns of the arrangement?
When identifying the relevant activities, consideration should be given to the purpose
and design of the arrangement. In particular, consideration should be given to the risks
to which the joint arrangement was designed to be exposed, the risks the joint
arrangement was designed to pass on to the parties involved with the joint arrangement,
and whether the parties are exposed to some or all of those risks.
In many cases, directing the strategic operating and financial policies of the
arrangement will be the activity that most significantly affects returns. Often, the
arrangement requires the parties to agree on both of these policies. However, in some
cases, unanimous consent may be required to direct the operating policies, but not the
financial policies (or vice versa). In such cases, since the activities are directed by
different parties, the parties would need to assess which of those two activities
(operating or financing) most significantly affects returns, and whether there is joint
control over that activity. This would be the case whenever there is more than one
activity that significantly affects returns of the arrangements, and those activities are
directed by different parties.
Based on the ownership structure, even though Wallace can block any decision, Wallace
does not control the arrangement, because Wallace needs Zimmerman to agree —
therefore joint control between Wallace and Zimmerman (since their votes and only their
votes, together meet the requirement). Because they are the only combination of parties
that collectively control the arrangement, it is clear that Wallace and Zimmerman must
unanimously agree.
The appropriate method for the joint venture is the equity method. The Income from
Investment in Gold Co. on December 31, 2015 is as follows:
Share in net income (P140,000 x 40%) P
56,000
Amortization of allocated excess ( 0)
Income from Investment on December 31, 2015 P 56,000
29. d
No joint control — multiple combinations of parties could be used to reach agreement
and collectively control the arrangement (i.e., Wallace and Zimmerman or Wallace and
American could vote together to meet the requirement). Since there are multiple
combinations, and the contractual agreement does not specify which parties must agree,
there is no unanimous consent.
It should be noted that since there is no joint control as indicated per problem and the
presence of 50% ownership holding is presumed to give significant influence of Wallace
over Goldman, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case. Therefore,
Goldman Company is considered as an associate instead of a joint venture.
The appropriate method for Investment in Associates is the equity method. The Income
from Investment in Gold Co. on December 31, 2015 is as follows:
Share in net income (P140,000 x 40%) P
56,000
Amortization of allocated excess ( 0)
Income from Investment on December 31, 2015 P 56,000
30. d
No joint control – multiple combinations could be used to reach agreement.
It should be noted that since there is no joint control as indicated per problem and the
presence of 35% ownership holding is presumed to give significant influence of Wallace
over Goldman, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case. Therefore,
Goldman Company is considered as an associate instead of a joint venture.
The appropriate method for Investment in Associates is the equity method. The Income
from Investment in Gold Co. on December 31, 2015 is as follows:
Share in net income (P140,000 x 40%) P
56,000
Amortization of allocated excess ( 0)
Income from Investment on December 31, 2015 P 56,000
17. d
No entry required only the decrease or increase in fair value is recognized to profit
and loss.
18. a
Cost of investment in entity Z:
Purchase price…………………………………………………………………….. P
28,000
Add: Transaction costs (1% x P28,000)………………………………………
280
Initial costs………………………………………………………………………….. P
28,280
Less: SME A’s share of entity Z’s loss for the year (25% x P20,000)……......
5,000
Costs of investment, December 31, 20x4…………………………………….
P23,280
Less: Fair value on December 31, 20x4…………………….................................P 15,000
Less: Costs to sell (5% x P15,000)…………………………………………….. 750
14,250
Impairment loss……………………………………………………………………….. P
9,030
19. b
Cost of investment in entity Z………………. ……………………………………………… ..P
28,000
Less: Fair value on December 31, 20x4………………….....................................................
15,000
Decrease in fair value on December 31, 20x4……………………………………………P
13,000
20. a
Entity X:
Cost of investment in entity X………………. …………………………………………… P
10,000
Less: Fair value on December 31, 20x4…………………...............................................
13,000
Increase in fair value on December 31, 20x4………………………………………… P
13,000
Entity Y:
Cost of investment in entity Y………………. …………………………………………… P
15,000
Less: Fair value on December 31, 20x4…………………...............................................
29,000
Increase in fair value on December 31, 20x4………………………………………… P
14,000
21. d – refer to paragraphs PFRSs for SMEs paragraphs 15.10 and 15.11
20x4: P101,000 because recoverable amount – fair value less costs to sell of
P98,000 is less than the cost of P101,000.
20x5: P101,000 because it is less than recoverable amount.
20x6: P86,000 because recoverable amount of P86,000 is less than cost of
P101,000.