Irigasi 3.8% SDF
Irigasi 3.8% SDF
Irigasi 3.8% SDF
A b s t r ac t
Aim and objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reduction in bacterial loading using 3.8% as an irrigating solution in
pulpectomized primary molars.
Study design: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed that included primary molars with pulp necrosis. Sixty necrotic canals were
included, 30 irrigated with 3.8% SDF (experimental group) and 30 with 1% NaOCl solution (control group); in all cases, two microbiological
samples from within the canals were taken with sterile paper points, the first after the canal opening and before the first irrigation, and the
second after instrumentation and final irrigation, before obturation. All samples were evaluated by Agar plate method.
Results: The results were statistically analyzed by student “t“ test. After analyzing samples before and after irrigation in the control group
(NaOCl), we found a strong significant decrease of bacterial load (p = < 0.001). The same occurred in the 3.8% SDF group samples (p = < 0.001).
When both groups were compared post irrigation, a statistically significant difference was observed in favor of 3.8 % SDF.
Conclusion: 3.8% SDF can be suggested as an alternative irrigant for pulpectomy of necrotic teeth.
Keywords: 3.8% SDF, Endodontic irrigation, NaOCl, Primary molars.
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry (2022): 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2130
Introduction 1,2,4–6
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Government Dental College
For effective endodontic treatment, an exhaustive cleaning, a and Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
precise diagnosis, and a predictable disinfection protocol that 3
Department of Microbiology, Govt. Grant Medical College; JJ Group
utilizes different irrigating solutions and intracanal medicaments of Hospital, Mumbai
are necessary.1 In spite of noteworthy advancements in all domains
Corresponding Author: Viral Maru, Department of Pediatric Dentistry,
of dentistry, the quest for the perfect irrigant solution is still going Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra,
on in pediatric endodontics.2 India, Phone: +91 9867220417, e-mail: [email protected] n
It is desirable to emphasize irrigants for cleaning primary teeth
How to cite this article: Maru V, Padawe D, Naik S, et al. Assessment
than removing dentin. Sodium hypochlorite is an extensively of Bacterial Load Using 3.8% SDF as an Irrigant in Pulpectomized
used endodontic irrigant, since its antimicrobial and solvent Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr
characteristics are adequate at 0.5-5.25% concentration levels for Dent 2022;15(S-1):S47–S51.
treating tissue,3 however, it might damage periradicular tissue even Source of support: Nil
if it enters at relatively mild concentrations.4,5
Conflict of interest: None
Intracanal irrigation using a 3.8% w/v solution of silver diamine
fluoride (SDF) has been implemented. It represents a 10-times Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai,
more diluted variant of the SDF used for performing root canal Maharashtra, India. The Institutional Ethics Committee gave its
treatment.6 Research suggests that 3.8% SDF exerts antibacterial approval to the research. A total of 60 necrotic canals of both
characteristics against an E. faecalis biofilm and can be employed genders, falling in the age group of 3–7 years, partook in this
as a root canal irrigant to reduce bacteria.7-10 controlled, randomized clinical testing after acquiring written
In contrast, the results of 3.8% SDF for irrigating primary teeth permission from their parents and/or guardians. The present
during endodontic therapy must be evaluated. Consequently, the trial had eligibility criteria of good overall health, a primary molar
present research objective was to ascertain and contrast the changes having necrosis in one or more pulp canals, presence of an abscess,
in bacterial activity after using 1% NaOCl and 3.8% SDF solutions for two-thirds or more intact root structure, and adequate tooth
endodontic irrigation of primary teeth. The null hypothesis indicates structure to hold a dental dam. The trial disqualified children
that there will be an absence of a noteworthy difference among the allergic to silver or sodium hypochlorite, systemic illness, pulp
two solutions with regards to the lower bacterial count. floor perforations, extensive mobility, or nonrestorable molar.
Sixty root canals were split in a random manner into two
M at e r i a l s and Methods categories, which are as follows:
The present research was carried out in collaboration with the • Experimental group (30 root canals): 3.8% silver diamine fluoride
Department of Microbiology, Grant Medical College and Hospital, (FAgamin; Argentina)
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India and Pediatrics and Preventive • Control group (30 root canals): 1% NaOCl solution
© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Bacterial Load of 3.8% SDF Endodontic Irrigant
Disinfected distilled water was used to prepare a 1% NaOCl solution Laboratory Procedures
from a 3% concentration level (Neelkanth, India).11 SDF was similarly Specimens (post- and pre-irrigations) were transported using
diluted to 3.8% from 38% using disinfected distilled water.12 The 1 mL thioglycolate broth that was inoculated for one day at 37°C.
pulpectomy process required only one sitting. The sample size It was followed by plating 1,000 mL broth using Soyabean Caesin
was ascertained from a pilot study comprising ten microbiological Digest Agar medium (HIMEDIA, India), which underwent anaerobic
samples extracted from necrotic root canals (five samples per incubation for 3 days at a 37°C temperature. The overall microbial
irrigant); however, these were not included for statistical analysis load (per mL) was determined through the Colony Forming Unit
in this research. (CFU) count on Trypticase Soy Agar comprising 400 g of L-cysteine
Likewise, reliability and uniformity testing for diagnostic and mL, 0. 5 g of hemin mL, 5% sheep blood, as well as 1 g of menadione
outcomes assessment was conducted independently; a Kappa test mL (Amyl Media, Australia).17
score of 0.90 was obtained.13 The irrigant for every case was selected Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed on all
randomly from a catalog of computer-generated random numbers. 120 pulpectomy-treated primary molars at 3 months, 6 months,
Patient sampling was carried out in a non-probabilistic mode. 9 months, and 12 months. No failures were reported in either group
at the end of the 12-month follow-up.
Preclinical Laboratory Procedures
Hemin (5 mg L-1) and menadione (1 mg L-1) could retain sampled Statistical Analysis
bacteria vitality; therefore, these substances were augmented using Samples (before and after irrigation) were assessed between and
pre-reduced thioglycolate tubes and were employed as growth across groups. The Student “t“ measure helped ascertain study
and movement media.14 aspect significance using continuous measurements between the
two sets based on metric parameters (independent, two-tailed).
Isolation and Disinfection of Operative Domain
Leven’s test was conducted to ascertain variance homogeneity.
One pediatric dentist conducted the research who obtained
periapical radiographs of the identified teeth using the conventional
paralleling method. The patients’ oral cavity was disinfected using
R e s u lts
a 60-second rinse with 0.12% chlorhexidine. Local anesthesia Children who underwent treatment had a 5-year average age; A
was used for the procedure, and the primary mandibular teeth total of 120 microbiological samples were gathered, with 60 from
were numbed using an inferior alveolar nerve block. In contrast, the control group (30 pre- and 30 postirrigation) and 60 from the
infiltration (palatal and buccal) was used for the primary maxillary experimental group (30 pre- and 30 postirrigation). Preirrigation
teeth. Teeth were cleaned using pumice, and a rubber dam was baselines were similar concerning bacterial load in necrotic canals
used to prepare the working area. Petroleum jelly was used on across both groups. Preirrigation specimens were identified and
the gingiva of the infected tooth. Provisit (CasaIdea, Mexico) was contrasted for colony formation characteristics (Table 1).
used at the tooth-damn junction to prevent saliva entering the Experimental group: before versus after irrigation
operating area. The tooth crown, dam, operative area, and clamp The pre- and postirrigation samples used for the experiment
were disinfected using 30% hydrogen peroxide for 60 seconds. had mean values of 2.64 ± 0.31 × 106 CFU/mL and 2.14 ± 0.41 ×
Subsequently, 5.25% NaOCl was used for 60 seconds, followed by 106 CFU/mL. Bacterial load (CFU/mL) was significant (p = < 0.001)
inactivation using 10% sodium thiosulfate.15,16 pre- and postirrigation (Fig. 1).
Caries tissue was removed using a sterile saline solution cooled Control group: before versus after irrigation
number 3 round carbide bur. The operative area and tooth cavity The control samples before and after irrigation had mean values
were again sterilized. The roof of the pulp was then extracted using of 3.40 ± 0.10 × 106 CFU/mL and 3.29 ± 0.05 × 106 CFU/mL. The
a similar-sized new bur. The root canal was then accessible using a changes in bacterial load before and after irrigation (CFU/mL) were
disinfected cotton pellet, which was kept on the base of the pulp statistically significant (p = < 0.001) (Fig. 2).
chamber to disallow disinfectants from entering tooth canals. After irrigation: experimental group versus control
Once irrigation was completed, the antimicrobial efficacy of
Preparation of Microbiological Samples the irrigants was contrasted by quantifying bacteria (CFU/mL).
Microbiological samples were extracted from tooth canals before The assessment suggested that the experimental sample was
irrigation. Three different absorbent paper points were sterilized significantly superior to the control sample (p = 0.300) (Fig. 3).
and used for different canal sizes. These points were inserted in
canals for 30 seconds after the canals were accessible. An intraoral Discussion
periapical radiograph was used preoperatively to determine the Pulpectomy helps to reduce premature primary tooth loss. Losses
workable length of the tooth canals. Some sterile saline solution was might cause inadequate area for permanent teeth, reduced arch
used to irrigate the canals, if they were dry before the points were length, impact on premolars, and molar mesial tipping next
inserted. The paper points used for the roots were placed in a tube to the infected primary molar. This process is a conservative
containing thioglycolate. Conventional teeth treatment followed approach.18,19 The objective behind cleaning and shaping of the
sample collection. FlexoFiles (Dentsply, Switzerland) instruments root canal is the removal of tissue remnants, toxins, and bacteria
were used with 0.5 mL of the identified irrigant after filing. The from the root canal setup. Mechanical processes solely are not
canal was wetted and dried one last time after instrumentation and adequate for exhaustive canal cleaning. The remaining pulp tissue,
before sealing the tooth. A postirrigation sample was obtained from dentin particles, and bacteria might remain due to irregular canal
the canals using another set of three sterilized paper points. Lastly, structures. Hence, irrigants must complement and aid endodontic
iodoform paste (Vitapex) was inserted in the canal. An intraoral treatment. Such solutions must remove dentin particles, break
periapical radiograph was obtained after the operation. Stainless down organic tissue, sterilize the canals, and lubricate the system
steel crowns (3M) were employed for after-treatment restoration. during the procedure without irritating nearby tissues.20
S48 International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Volume 15 Special Issue 1 (Pediatr Endodont)
Bacterial Load of 3.8% SDF Endodontic Irrigant
Table 1: Comparison of colony forming units per mL in experimental and control group
Colony forming unit per mL Experimental Group Control Group Total p value
Pre-Irrigation 2.64 ± 0.31 x 106 3.40 ± 0.10 x 106 3.02 ± 0.45 x 106 < 0.001*
After Irrigation 2.14 ± 0.41 x 106 3.29 ± 0.05 x 106 2.72 ± 0.65 x 106 < 0.001*
difference 0.492 0.107 0.300 –
p value < 0.001* < 0.001* < 0.001* –
*Statistically significant
Fig. 1: Comparison of colony forming unit per mL x 106 – pre- and Fig. 3: Comparison of colony forming units per mL x 106 pre- and
postirrigation in experimental group. postirrigation in experimental and control group
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Volume 15 Special Issue 1 (Pediatr Endodont) S49
Bacterial Load of 3.8% SDF Endodontic Irrigant
or interappointment dressing, particularly in locations where considerable tissue dissolution ability and were effective in
potential blackening/browning of dentin by metallic silver is a cleansing root canals.36 Baumgartner and Cuenin37 demonstrated
minor concern. Mathew et al. (2012)28 discovered that SDF solution that each concentration of NaOCl was similarly efficient in removing
as an endodontic irrigant can efficiently eliminate the microbes loose debris and entirely eliminating predentin and pulpal remnants
found in the circumpulpal dentin and canal. Thus, the present from nonprocessed canal walls. Necrotic pulpal tissues and smear
research found 3.8% SDF to be better in comparison to 1% NaOCl layers were subjected to dissolution equally fine by 5.25%, 2.6%,
in bacterial load following pulpectomy process in primary molars. and 1.3% NaOCl.38
This deduction is confirmed by study carried out by Mathew and
colleagues who stated that 3.8% SDF exhibits inhibitory effect on
synthesis of bacterial cell wall, cell division, and DNA unwinding,
C o n c lu s i o n
therefore, effectively decreasing microbial load inside the root More controlled clinical trials are required to support the
canal.28 Noriko et al. investigated the impact of NaOCl and 38% SDF effectiveness of 3.8% SDF as an irrigant solution, the results
on in vitro E. faecalis biofilm and observed 100% effectiveness of 3.8% reported by this study are highly encouraging in terms of being a
SDF against E. faecalis following a direct 60 minute contact.9 The suitable and potent alternative for irrigation of endodontic canals
review of literature did not find any other research evaluating 3.8% of primary teeth.
SDF solution as an irrigant in pulpectomy treatments.
The SDF advantage over other irrigants such as sodium Orcid
hypochlorite is that besides having similar antibacterial
Viral maru http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-1780
characteristics, the interaction between teeth and SDF causes
reciprocal formation of fluoroapatite. The quantity of fluoride
release is twice of that observed in other fluoridating substances.
This increases the antibacterial activity and may lead to increased
References
1. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM, Gajan EB. Study of root canal
longevity and enable prevention of reinfection within the root
accessibility in human primary molars. J Oral Sci 2008; 50(1):69–74.
canal. Rise in surface hardness, reduction in permeability, and DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.50.69
growth in the root canal’s fracture resistance have all been observed 2. Medici MC, Froner IC. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of
when SDF was initially utilized as an adjuvant coupled with lasers different root canal irrigation regimes. Braz Oral Res 2006;20:235–240.
in endodontic preparation, since it can safeguard the root dentin DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000300010
from impairment because of laser.29 3. Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, et al. Tissue dissolving capacity
The primary drawback of SDF is black discoloration because and antimicrobial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite
of generation of silver phosphate that turns black on decrease solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:756–762.
in oral environment. Nonetheless, in the present research, this DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.128961
4. Hulsmann M, Hahn W. Complications during root canal irrigation:
discoloration was concealed by postendodontic recovery in the form
literature review and case reports. Int Endod J 2003;33:186–193.
of stainless steel crowns. It also results in gingival irritation, which is DOI: 10.3390/ma14102580
resolved by itself within 2 days. In the present research, the gingiva 5. Gernhardt CR, Eppendorf K, Kozlowski A, et al. Toxicity of
was layered with petroleum jelly to prevent this irritation. The SDF concentrated sodium hypochlorite used as an endodontic irrigant.
is metallic in taste. Thus, in the present research, rubber dam was Int Endod J 2004;37:272-280. DOI: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00804.x
applied along with provisit to restrain any contact among SDF and 6. Bohora A, Hegde V, Kokate S. Comparison of antibacterial efficacy
saliva. It causes coloring of skin, which is riskless and resolves by of neem leaf extract and 2% sodium hypochlorite against E.
itself within few days when the epithelial cells slough off.29 faecalis, C. albicans and mixed culture — An in vitro study.
Endodontology 2010;22:8–12.
Prereduced thioglycolate has been utilized in the present
7. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. J Conserv
research to carry microbiological samples from septic root canals to Dent 2010;13:256–264. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.73378
the laboratory, as recommended by Carlsson.14 This mode decreases 8. Vinod BM, Koppolu M, Nuvulla S,et al. Anti-microbial efficiency
oxygen, averting the accrual of superoxide radicals which might of silver diamine fluoride as an endodontic medicament –
destroy anaerobic bacteria; furthermore, it comprises tiny quantities An ex vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3(3):262–264.
of agar, which averts dissemination of oxygen within the medium. A DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.103615
crucial step in endodontic microbiology investigations is the design 9. Noriko H, Cynthia KYY, Nigel MK, et al. Antimicrobial Efficacy of 3.8%
and execution of a preoperative disinfection procedure of the field, Silver Diamine Fluoride and Its Effect on Root Dentin. J Endod
2010;36(6):1026–1029. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.029
such that the collecting of microbiological samples is conducted in
10. Vahid Z, Hadi M, Mehrdad L, et al. A scanning electron microscope
the most hygienic conditions possible, avoiding the polluting that study on the effect of an experimental irrigation solution on smear
might affect the results.15 The disinfection protocol utilized in this layer removal. Iran Endod J 2014;9(2):131–136.
work was a variation of the one outlined by Ng YL. 30 11. Frais S, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Some factors affecting the concentration
1% NaOCl was utilized since research works exhibited of available chlorine in commercial sources of sodium hypochlorite.
insignificant differences in antimicrobial activity for 1%, 2.5%, Int Endod J 2001;34(3):206–215. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00371.x
and 5.25% NaOCl in the affected root canals. 31,32 After 0.5% NaOCl 12. Hiraishi N, Yiu CK, King NM, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of 3.8%
was utilized in higher quantity and with higher irrigation period, it silver diamine fluoride and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 2010
36:1026–1029. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.029
possessed reasonable antibacterial activity.33 For all concentrations,
13. Landis JR, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for
sodium hypochlorite was effectual in removing resistant categorical data Biometrics 1977;33:159–174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310
endodontically significant microbes such as Bacillus subtilis, E. 14. Carlsson J, Sundqvist G. Evaluation of methods of transport
faecalis, Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus and cultivation of bacterial specimens from infected dental
aureus, and Streptococcus mutans.34-35 From a cleansing viewpoint, root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;49(5):451–454.
lesser quantities of NaOCl concentrations nevertheless preserved DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(80)90290-x
S50 International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Volume 15 Special Issue 1 (Pediatr Endodont)
Bacterial Load of 3.8% SDF Endodontic Irrigant
15. Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos A, et al. Bacteria quantification 28. Mathew VB, Madhusudhana K, Sivakumar N, et al. Anti-microbial
in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instrumentation and efficiency of silver diamine fluoride as an endodontic medicament -
different intracanal medications: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod An ex vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent 2012;3(3):262–264.
2007;33:114–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.003 DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.103615
16. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN. Catonella morbid and Granulicatella 29. Sauvik G, Shubharata P, Sagar P, et al. Stretching new boundaries of
adiancodens: new species in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral caries prevention with Silver Diamine Fluoride: A review of literature.
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:259–264. Int J Pedod Rehabil 2018;3:1–4. DOI: 10.4103/ijpr.ijpr_32_17
17. Elizabeth M, Mangala AN, Nicholas A. Jacques Neil Hunter. Quantitative 30. Ng YL, Spratt D, Sriskantharajah S, et al. Evaluation of protocols for
microbiological study of human carious dentin by culture and field contamination before bacterial sampling of root canals for
real-time PCR: Association of anaerobes with histopathological contemporary microbiology techniques. J Endod 2003;29:317–320.
changes in chronic pulpitis. Clin Microbiol 2002;40 (5):1698–1704. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200305000-00001
18. Ounsi HF, Debaybo D, Salameh Z, et al. Endodontic considerations 31. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Favieri A, et al. Chemomechanical reduction
in pediatric dentistry: A clinical perspective. Int Dent South of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation
Afr 2009;11:40–50. and irrigation with 1%, 2.5% and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod
19. Berk H, Krakow AA. A comparison of the management of pulpal 2000;26:331–334. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200006000-00006
pathosis in deciduous and permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral 32. Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Santos SR, et al. Efficacy of instrumentation
Pathol 1972;34(6):944–955. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(72)90232-0 techniques and irrigation regimes I reducing the bacterial
20. Mehdipour O, Kleier DJ, Averbach R. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite population within root canals. J Endod 2002;28:181–184.
accidents.Compendium of continuing education in dentistry DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009
(1995)2007;28(10): 544–546. 33. Estrela CR, Estrela C, Reis C, et al. Control of microorganisms in vitro
21. Gatot A, Arbelle J, Leiberman A, et al. Effects of sodium hypochlorite by endodontic irrigants. Braz Dent J 2003;14:187–192. DOI: 10.1590/
on soft tissues after its inadvertent injection beyond the root apex. s0103-64402003000300009
J Endod 1991;17(11):573–574. 34. Camara AC, de Albuquerque MM, Aguiar CM, et al. In vitro
22. Siqueria JF, Machado AG, Silveria RM, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness antimicrobial activity of 0.5%, 1% and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in
of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the root canals instrumented with the Protaper Universal system. Oral
elimination of Enterococcus Faecalis from root canals in vitro. Int Endod J Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e55–e61.
1997;30:279–282. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1997.00096.x DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.037
23. Craig GG, Powell KR, Cooper MH. Caries progression in primary 35. D Arcangelo C, Varvara G, de Fazio P. An evaluation of the action of
molars: 24-month results from a minimal treatment programme. different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobicanareobic, obligate
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981;9(6):260–265. DOI: 10.1111/ anaerobic and microaerophilic bacteria. J Endod 1999;25:351–353.
j.1600-0528.1981.tb00342.x DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81170-2
24. Mei ML, Ito L, Cao Y,et al. The inhibitory effects of silver diamine 36. Naenni N, Thoma K, Zehnder M. Soft tissue dissolution capacity
fluorides on cysteine cathepsins. J Dent 2014;42(3):18–27.DOI:10.10 of currently used and potential endodontic irrigants. J Endod
16/j.jdent.2013.11.018 2004;30(11):785–787. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200411000-00009
25. Suzuki T, Nishida M, Sobue S, et al. Effects of diamine silver fluoride 37. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of
on tooth enamel S. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1974 14: 61–72. sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod 1992;18:
26. Tanaka M. The effect of Silver Fluoride Applied in Pulp-removed Root 605–612.
Canal. J Osaka Univ Dent Soc. 1970;15: 34–47. 38. Beltz RE, Torabinejad M, Pouresmail M. Quantitative analysis of the
27. Okamoto E, Kutsuna H, Nakamura Y. Effect of Diammine Silver Fluoride solubilizing action of MTAD, sodium hypochlorite and EDTA on bovine
on Treatment of Infected Root Canal Part 1. On the Number of Treatments pulp and dentin. J Endod 2003;29:334–337. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-
Required far Root Canal Filling. Nippon Dent Rev. 1971; 343:625–626. 200305000-00004
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, Volume 15 Special Issue 1 (Pediatr Endodont) S51