INTRODUCTION TO OIL AND GAS ENGINEERING

KG12303
(2022/2023-1)
DR. NORFAZLIANA BINTI ABDULLAH
[email protected]
Contact No. : 018-2944811
Room No. : 17
COURSE CONTENTS
❖ 1. overview of Formation Evaluation
❖ 2. Mud Logging
❖ 3. Coring
❖ 4. Open-hole Logging
❖ 5. Logging While Drilling
❖ 6. Formation Testing
3
Common Reservoir Rock types
Formation Evaluation
▪ What is Formation Evaluation?
▪ Formation Evaluation (FE) is the process of interpreting
a combination of measurements taken inside a wellbore
to detect and quantify oil and gas reserves in the rock
adjacent to the well. FE data can be gathered with
wireline logging instruments or logging-while-drilling
tools.
▪ Study of the physical properties of rocks and the fluids
contained within them.
▪ Data are organized and interpreted by depth and
represented on a graph called a log (a record of
information about the formations through which a well
has been drilled).
Formation Evaluation
▪ Why Formation Evaluation?
▪ To evaluate hydrocarbons reservoir and predict oil
recovery.
▪ To provide the reservoir engineers with the formation’s
geological and physical parameters necessary for the
construction of a fluid-flow model of the reservoir.
▪ Measurement of in situ formation fluid pressure and
acquisition of formation fluid samples.
▪ In petroleum exploration and development, formation
evaluation is used to determine the ability of a borehole
to produce petroleum.
1. Mud Logging
▪ Mud logging (or Wellsite Geology) is a well logging process
in which drilling mud and drill bit cuttings from the
formation are evaluated during drilling and their properties
recorded on a strip chart as a visual analytical tool and
stratigraphic cross sectional representation of the well.
▪ Provide continuous record of penetration rate, lithology
and hydrocarbon shows.
▪ These information supports wireline log data.
▪ From the cuttings, an oil stains or odor of oil may be
detected, become an excellent qualitative indicator.
▪ The fluorescent lamp is also a great help in detecting oil
shows.
▪ The gas record and lithological (general physical of rock
characteristics) sample are plotted along with surface
parameters such as rate of penetration (ROP), weight on
bit (WOB), rotation per minute (RPM) etc. on the mudlog
which serve as a tool for the drilling engineers and mud
engineers.
▪ Lagging problem: a discrepancy between the time the rock
was drilled and the time it reached the surface –
particularly for deep wells, where it take two or more hours
to reach the surface.
 2. Coring
▪ One way to get more detailed samples
of a formation is by coring, where
formation sample is drilled out by
means of a special bit.
▪ This sample can provide:
▪ Detailed lithological decscription.
▪ Porosity, permeability, fluid
saturation, and grain density.
▪ These parameters are measured in the
laboratory and serve as a basis for
calibrating the response of the porosity
logging tools and to establish a
porosity/permeability relationship.
▪ Two techniques commonly used at
present. The first is a "whole core", a
cylinder of rock, usually about 3" to 4" in
diameter (8~10 cm) and up to 50' to 60’
(15~18 m) long.
▪ It is cut with a "core barrel", a hollow
pipe tipped with a ring-shaped diamond
chip-studded bit that can cut a plug and
bring it to the surface.
▪ Taking a full core is an expensive
operation that usually stops or slows
drilling operation, hence is done before
the drilling has been done.
Coring Tool & Core Barrel
▪ The other, cheaper, technique for obtaining samples of the
formation is "Sidewall Coring". In this method, a steel
cylinder—a coring gun—has hollow-point steel bullets
mounted along its sides and moored to the gun by short
steel cables.
▪ The coring gun is lowered to the bottom of the interval of
interest and the bullets are fired individually and the core
will be retrieved.
▪ Advantages of this technique are low cost and the ability to
sample the formation after it has been drilled.
Core Preservation
▪ Once the core is retrieve to surface then it is important that
it should remain as unchanged as possible.

▪ The core should be prevented from drying out, coming into

contact with oxygen or being mechanically damaged.
▪ Core barrel is filled with resin to prevent the core from
moving and to minimize the exposed surface area.
▪ Freezing the core in freezer containers.
▪ Core sample is wrapped in a plastic film or aluminum
foil and then dipped in molten wax.
Core Analysis
▪ Can be divided into two categories:
▪ Conventional Core Analysis.
▪ Special Core Analysis.

▪ Conventional Core Analysis.

▪ The core is usually slabbed, cut lengthwise to make the
structure visible.
▪ Provides information on lithology, residual fluid
saturation, ambient porosity, ambient gas permeability,
and grain density.
 Gas Permeameter

Liquid Permeameter
Porosimeter
▪ Special Core Analysis :
Provides the following information:
▪ Porosity and permeability at elevated confining stress.
▪ Electrical properties such as formation factor and
resistivity index.
▪ Capillary pressure.
▪ Wettability and relative permeability.
▪ Mechanical rock properties such as compressibility.
▪ Waterflood sensitivity for injectivity and well
performance.
 3. Open-hole Logging
▪ Open-hole logging or Cased-hole
logging?
▪ Most logging tools are designed for
uncased holes.
▪ Open‐hole logging, which is the most
widely used logging method, makes it
possible to assess the commercial
viability of a formation.
▪ Before spending the money to complete
a well.
▪ Open‐hole logs can be used to
determine fluid contacts in a formation,
obtain geological properties i.e. porosity
and rock type, make pore pressure
measurements, and obtain reservoir
fluid samples
3. Open-hole Logging (continued)
▪ Open-hole logging, also known as
well logging is the practice of
making a detailed record (a well log)
of the geologic formations
penetrated by a borehole.
▪ Open hole logs are run before the
oil or gas well is lined with pipe or
cased.
 Principal of Well Logging
▪ A well log is a record of
certain formation data
versus depth.
▪ The appropriate downhole
logging tools instrument
called ‘sonde’, about 3.5"
in diameter is lowered into
mud-filled hole on logging
cable.
Rock formation Rock formation
▪ The result will be analyzed to determine which of the
layers are porous and permeable, and likely to
contain hydrocarbon.
▪ A depth calibration wheel records the length of cable
in the hole.
▪ Survey is normally done from the bottom up. As the
sonde is pulled up the hole, a continuous
measurement signal is sent to the surface where the
data is processed and recorded as a curve.
▪ This tools will measure the electrical, acoustic, and
radioactive properties of the formation.
Well Log Format
Header :
The header contains information about
the well (such as name,
location, and owner), the logging run
(such as date, logging company, and
tool description)

Scale :
The scales for the measurement at the
top of the tracks

Track:
The measurement tracks display
measurement values relative to a scale
that is suitable for the measurement.
More than one measurement may be
displayed in each measurement track
Example :
LOGGING ENVIRONMENT
● If pressure in the borehole during drilling > pressure in the formation, the
pressure difference will drive drilling mud into the permeable formation. Larger
particles in the drilling mud will be filtered out at the rock face of the borehole
and create a mud cake adjacent to the borehole.
● The liquid with any small particulates that pass through the mud cake is called the
mud filtrate.
● The mud cake can reduce the flow of fluids between the formation and the well.
The formation damage caused by mud cake and filtrate can be quantified by well
testing that yields a parameter called “skin.”
● During drilling, portions of fluids originally in the flushed zone are displaced by the
invading mud filtrate and pushed into the transition zone. During logging, fluids in
the flushed zone include mud filtrate with any suspended solids, some native
brine, and any remaining oil and gas.
● Reservoir rock and fluid properties in the uninvaded zone have not been altered
from their original state by fluids from the drilling operation.
Information gain form Well Logging
Electrical Logs
▪ Developed by Conrad & Marcel Schlumberger (who
founded Schlumberger Limited), and introduced to the
US in 1929.
▪ Can be divided into two main types:
▪ measurement of natural electrical current in the rock
(SP Log), and
▪ measurement of induced electrical current
(Resistivity Log and Induction Log).
(1) Spontaneous Potential (SP) Log
▪ Also known as Self Potential Log.
5185
-100 -50
SP
0 50 100

▪ SP Log record weak electrical 5195

5205
Shale
currents that flow naturally in the 5215
5225
rock next to the wellbore (natural 5235
5245
electricity). 5255
Sandstone
5265

▪ The log shows the boundaries and 5275

5285
thickness of each layer of rock, 5295
5305
Shale
especially permeable (sandstone) 5315
5325
and impermeable (shale). 5335

▪
5345

Because the SP Log is so simple to 5355

5365
Sandstone
obtain and provide such basic 5375
5385
information, it is the most 5395
5405
common log. 5415 Shale
▪
SP
Useful for: 5185
-100 -50 0 50 100

5195
5205
Shale
▪ Detecting permeable beds 5215
5225
and it thickness. 5235

▪ Locating their boundaries and

5245
5255
Sandstone
permitting correlation of such 5265
5275
beds. 5285

▪ Determining formation water 5295

5305
Shale
resistivity (Rw). 5315

▪
5325
Determining the percentage 5335

of shale in permeable beds. 5345

5355 Sandstone
5365
5375
5385
5395
5405
5415 Shale
Determination of shale percentage

x 100
(2) Resistivity Logs
▪ Use to measure the resistivity of the formation, and thus
the possibility of hydrocarbon shows.
▪ A sonde sends an electrical signal through the formation
and relays it back to a receiver at the surface (induced
electricity). The surface detector will measure the
formation’s resistance to the current.
▪ A rock which contains an oil and/or gas saturation will
have a higher resistivity than the same rock completely
saturated with formation water.
 (3) Induction Logs
▪ Use to measure the conductivity of the formation, and
thus the possibility of hydrocarbon shows.
▪ A rock which contains an oil and/or gas saturation will have
a lower conductivity than the same rock completely
saturated with formation water (hence, inverse of the
resistivity logs).
▪ Induction logs use an electric coil in the sonde to generate
an alternating current loop in the formation by induction.
▪ Induction tools give best results when mud resistivity is high
with respect to formation resistivity, i.e., fresh water mud
(ILD) or non-conductive fluid. In oil-base mud, which is non
conductive, induction logging is the only option available.
(4) Dielectric Logs
▪ Responds essentially to water and is unaffected by the
presence of hydrocarbons.
▪ Particularly important in determining the irreducible
water saturation when oil-based muds are used.
(5) Sonic or Acoustic Logs
▪ Provide continuous record of the time taken in
microsecond/foot by sound wave to travel from the
transmitter to the receiver in the sonde.
▪ Velocity of sound through a given formation is a function
of its lithological and porosity.
▪ Dense, low porosity rocks are characterized by high
velocity of sound wave and vise-versa for porous and less
dense formation.
(6) Nuclear Logs
▪ Just as SP and resistivity logs record natural and induced
electrical currents, nuclear logs (also called radioactivity
logs) record natural and induced radioactivity.
▪ Three type of logs: Gamma Ray Log, Neutron Log,
and Formation Density Log.
i. Gamma Ray Log
▪
GR
Record the natural γ-radioactivity 5185
-50 0 50 100 150

of rocks surrounding the borehole. 5195

5205

▪ The γ-radiation arises from three 5215

5225
Shale

elements present in the rocks, 5235

5245
isotopes of potassium (K), 5255 Sandstone
uranium (U) and thorium (Th). 5265
5275

▪ Useful for defining shale beds 5285

5295 Shale
because K, U and Th are largely 5305
5315
concentrated in association with 5325
5335
clay minerals. 5345 Sandstone
▪ It is used to define permeable
5355
5365

beds when SP log cannot be 5375

5385
Shale
employed 5395
5405
5415
 ii. Neutron Log
▪ To obtain a neutron log, a sonde sends atomic particles
called neutrons through the formation.
▪ When the neutrons collide with hydrogen, the hydrogen
slows them down.
▪ The response of the devise is primarily a function of the
hydrogen nuclei concentration.
▪ When the detector records slow neutrons, it means a lot
of hydrogen is present – main component of water and
hydrocarbon, but not of rocks.
▪ Considered as porosity log because hydrogen is mostly
present in pore fluids (water, hydrocarbons) the count
rate can be converted into apparent porosity.
iii. Formation Density Log
▪ This devise measure number of photon then be related
to electron density of the formation.
▪ Electron density is related to an apparent bulk density
which equivalent to formation bulk density.
▪ Useable to detect formation lithology.
https://production-technology.org/how-to-read-a-well-log/
https://www.slb.com/resource-library/oilfield-review/defining-series/defining-log-interpretation

Refer page 29 Refer page 23

4. Logging While Drilling
▪ One of the major drawbacks of wireline information is
that it is received several hours to several weeks after the
borehole is drilled.
▪ During this time period, the formation can undergo
significant alteration, especially in its fluid saturation,
effective porosity, and relative permeability.
▪ LWD allow wireline-type information to be available as
near as real-time as possible.
▪ Logging While Drilling (LWD) is a technique of conveying
well logging tools into the well borehole downhole as
part of the bottom hole assembly (BHA).
▪ Some available measurement in LWD technology:
▪ Gamma Ray
▪ Resistivity
▪ Density
▪ Neutron (porosity)
▪ Sonic (fairly recent)
▪ Formation pressure
▪ Formation fluid sampler
▪ Borehole caliper (Ultra sonic azimuthal caliper and
density caliper).
5. Formation Testing
◼ Obtaining information concerning the liquid and pressure
in an open-hole formations.
◼ Three methods:
■ Wireline testing
■ Drill stem test (DST)
■ Well Test Analysis
5a. Wireline Testing
◼ Provide reservoir fluid samples, reservoir pressure, an
indication of fluid mobility and information on reservoir
continuity.
◼ Two types: Repeat Formation Tester (RFT) and Formation
Interval Tester (FIT).
◼ The RFT is run into the hole and a continuous digital
readout of hydrostatic pressure is obtained.
◼ At any point in the hole the tool may be actuated to force
a rubber pad against the wall of the hole, and a tube in
the centre of the pad is forced hard against the
formation.
◼ The formation fluid will flow to the chamber through the
tube.
◼ The FIT is used for single test – only one pressure reading
and one fluid sample for each run.
◼ A tool is actuated (a pad is tightly against the formation
to form a seal against hydrostatic pressure of the fluid in
the hole).
◼ A shaped charge is then fired into the formation, opening
a passageway for formation fluids to flow into a chamber
in the tool. At the same time the formation pressure will
be recorded.
5b. Drillstem Test (DST)
◼ A drill stem test (DST) is a procedure for isolating and
testing the surrounding geological formation through the
drill stem.
◼ The test is a measurement of pressure behavior at the
drill stem and is a valuable way to obtain important
sampling information on the formation fluid and to
establish the probability of commercial production.
◼ The test is made by lowering a valve, a packer, and a
length of perforated tailpipe to the level of formation.
◼ The packer set against the wall of the borehole so that it
seals off the test interval from the mud column above
(and below).
◼ The valve is then opened,
and the formation fluid will
flow to the surface through
the drillpipe.
◼ The amount of fluid
produced will represent the
fluid production can be
expected from the well.
 5c. Well Test Analysis
◼ Two types of testing: pressure build-up and draw down test.
◼ The primary objectives of well testing are to establish:
◼ Permeability thickness (kh) and permeability (k)
◼ Stratification (by sequential testing of layer).
◼ Well productivity.
◼ Investigate reservoir boundaries and size.
◼ The amount of fluid produced will represent the fluid
production can be expected from the well.
Build-up test data
Drawdown test
data
Thank You

39