Adoption
Adoption
Adoption
and RA
8043 which governs inter-country adoption. Though RA 11642 amended many of the provisions of RA 8403, but the latter
is still the prevailing law when it pertains to inter-country adoption. In essence, inter-country adoption is a form of last
resort as it can only be availed whenever a Filipino child cannot be adopted by qualified Filipinos.
In all cases of adoption, the state will always ensure the best interest of the child.
RA 11642 RA 8043
DOMESTIC ADOPTION INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION
Sec 2 Declaration of Policy Sec 2 Declaration of Policy
– It is hereby declared the policy of the State to ensure that - It is hereby declared the policy of the State to provide
every child remains under the care and custody of the every neglected and abandoned child with a family that will
parents and be provided with love, care, understanding, provide such child with love and care as well as
and security towards the full and harmonious development opportunities for growth and development. Towards this
of the child’ personality. end, efforts shall be exerted to place the child with an
The best interest of the child shall be the paramount adoptive family in the Philippines. However, recognizing
consideration in the enactment of alternative care, custody, that inter-country adoption may be considered as allowing
and adoption policies aliens, not presently allowed by law to adopt Filipino
children if such children cannot be adopted by qualified
Filipino citizens or aliens, the State shall take measures to
ensure that inter-country adoptions are allowed when the
same shall prove beneficial to the child's best interests,
and shall serve and protect his/her fundamental rights.
What is adoption under both laws?
Sec 4 Definition of terms Sec 3 Definition of terms
-Adoption refers to the socio-legal process of providing a -Inter-country adoption refers to the socio-legal process of
permanent family to a child whose parents had voluntarily adopting a Filipino child by a foreigner or a Filipino citizen
or involuntarily given up their parental rights, permanently permanently residing abroad where the petition is filed, the
transferring all rights and responsibilities, along with supervised trial custody is undertaken, and the decree of
filiation, making the child a legitimate child of the adoptive adoption is issued outside the Philippines.
parents: Provided, That adult adoption shall be covered by
the benefits of this Act;
SEC 22 Who May Be Adopted. – The following may be SEC. 8. Who May be Adopted. — Only a legally free child
adopted: may be the subject of inter-country adoption. In order that
such child may be considered for placement, the following
(a) Any child who has been issued a CDCLAA; documents must be submitted to the Board:
(b) The legitimate child of one spouse by the other a. Child study;
spouse; b. Birth certificate/foundling certificate;
c. Deed of voluntary commitment/decree of
abandonment/ death certificate of parents;
(c) An illegitimate child by a qualified adopter to d. Medical evaluation/history;
improve status of legitimacy; e. Psychological evaluation, as necessary; and
f. Recent photo of the child.
(d) A Filipino of legal age if, prior to the adoption,
said person has been consistently considered and
treated by the adopters as their own child for a
period of at least three (3) years; Sect 3 of RA 8043 defines child as a Child means a person
below fifteen (15) years of age unless sooner emancipated
(e) A foster child; by law. This is now amended unded RA 6908 which
provides that a child shall be referred as any person under
(f) A child whose adoption has been previously the age of 18.
rescinded;
Adoption requirements
Section 24. Documentary Requirements. – The PAPs shall Sec 10
attach the following to the Petition for Adoption and shall
submit the same to the RACCO: The application shall be supported by the following
documents written and officially translated in English:
(a) Home study report and child case study report
duly prepared pursuant to the provisions of this Act, a. Birth certificate of applicants(s);
which requires a uniform and standardized format of b. Marriage contract, if married, and divorce decree,
the report; if applicable;
c. Written consent of their biological or adopted
(b) Authenticated or security paper copies of birth children above ten (10) years of age, in the form of
record of the PAPs and the child; sworn statement;
d. Physical, medical and psychological evaluation by
(c) Authenticated or security paper copies of a duly licensed physician and psychologist;
Marriage Certificate, if the PAPs are married; or e. Income tax returns or any document showing the
Court Decision or Certificate of Finality, if annulled, financial capability of the applicant(s);
divorced or legally separated; f. Police clearance of applicant(s);
g. Character reference from the local church/minister,
(d) National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) or Police the applicant's employer and a member of the
immediate community who have known the
Clearance; If foreign national, clearance from police applicant(s) for at least five (5) years; and
authorities where he or she lived for more than h. Recent postcard-size pictures of the applicant(s)
twelve (12) months any time in the past fifteen (15) and his immediate family
years;
Sec 25 Case Study. – No Petition for Adoption shall be SEC. 10. Where to File Application. — An application to adopt
processed by the NACC or its RACCs unless an adoption a Filipino child shall be filed either with the Philippine
social worker of the NACC, the social service office of the Regional Trial Court having jurisdiction over the child, or with
LGU, or any child-placing or child-caring agency, has made the Board, through an intermediate agency, whether
a case study of the adoptee, the biological parents as well governmental or an authorized and accredited agency, in the
as the adopters, and has submitted the report and country of the prospective adoptive parents, which application
recommendations on the matter to the respective RACCO shall be in accordance with the requirements as set forth in
as among the supporting documents of the petition, and the implementing rules and regulations to be promulgated by
the NACC for the issuance of the Certificate of Adoption. the Board. ( This has now been amended under sec 30 of RA
11642 ).
Sec 27
EFFCTS OF ADOPTION
Sec 41. Legitimacy. – the adoptee shall be considered the
legitimate child of the adopter for all intents and purposes
and as such in entitled to all the rights and obligations
provided by law to legitimate children born to them without
discrimination of any kind. To this end, the adoptee is
entitled to love, guidance, and support in keeping with the
means of the family. The legitimate filiation that is created
between the adopter and adoptee shall be extended to the
adopter’s parents, adopter’s legitimate siblings, and
legitimate descendants.
The law is clear. There is no room for ambiguity. Petitioner, having remarried at the time the petitions for adoption were
filed, must jointly adopt. Since the petitions for adoption were filed only by petitioner herself, without joining her husband,
Olario, the trial court was correct in denying the petitions for adoption on this ground
Petitioner, in her Memorandum, insists that subsequent events would show that joint adoption could no longer be possible
because Olario has filed a case for dissolution of his marriage to petitioner in the Los Angeles Superior Court.
We disagree. The filing of a case for dissolution of the marriage between petitioner and Olario is of no moment. It is not
equivalent to a decree of dissolution of marriage. Until and unless there is a judicial decree for the dissolution of the
marriage between petitioner and Olario, the marriage still subsists. That being the case, joint adoption by the husband and
the wife is required. We reiterate our ruling above that since, at the time the petitions for adoption were filed, petitioner
was married to Olario, joint adoption is mandatory.
ACAIN VS IAC
Facts
Petitioner Constantino Acain filed in the Regional Trial Court of Cebu City Branch XIII, a petition for the probate of the will
of the late Nemesio Acain and for the issuance to the same... petitioner of letters testamentary, docketed as Special
Proceedings No. 591-A-CEB (Rollo, p. 29), on the premise that Nemesio Acain died leaving a will in which petitioner and
his brothers Antonio, Flores and Jose and his sisters.
Issues
Can a legally adopted child be disinherited through preterition
Ruling
Preterition consists in the omission in the testator's will of the forced heirs or anyone of them either because they are not
mentioned therein, or, though mentioned, they are neither instituted as heirs nor are expressly disinherited (Nuguid v.
Nuguid, 17 SCRA 450 [1966]; Maninang v. Court of Appeals, 114 SCRA 478 [1982]). Insofar as the widow is concerned,
Article 854 of the Civil Code may not apply as she does not ascend or descend from the testator, although she is a
compulsory heir. Stated otherwise, even if the surviving spouse is a compulsory heir, there is no preterition even if she is
omitted from the inheritance, for she is not in the direct line. (Art. 854, Civil code) however, the same thing cannot be said
of the other respondent Virginia A. Fernandez, whose legal adoption by the testator has not been questioned by petitioner
(.Memorandum for the Petitioner, pp. 8-9). Under Article 39 of P.D. No. 603, known as the Child and Youth Welfare Code,
adoption gives to the adopted person the same rights and duties as if he were a legitimate child of the adopter and makes
the adopted person a legal heir of the adopter. It cannot be denied that she has totally omitted and preterited in the will of
the testator and that both adopted child and the widow were deprived of at least their legitime. Neither can it be denied
that they were not expressly disinherited. Hence, this is a clear case of preterition of the legally adopted child.
IN RE; OF THE ADOPTION OF STEPHANIE NATHY ASTORGA
Facts
Petitoner filed for the adoption of his illegitimate child Stepahie which was granted by RTC. However, the same court
denied a part of the petition that would allow the child to use the surname of her biological mother as her middle name .
Issues
May an adopted child use the surname of his/her biological parents?
Ruling
It was held in this case that an adopted child may choose to use the surname of her biological parents, in this case, her
mother, as her middle name. The court also stated that though the Fmily Code grants the right to an adopted child to use
the surname of her adopted parents but it should not preclude the same child to use the surname of her biological mother
as her middle name given that the child has the right to know the source of her origin, and the SC also noted that allowing
the child to use the surname of her mother as her middle name would not detract the her relationship with her adopted
parents.
LAZATIN VS CAMPOS
Facts
Spouses Maranio and Margarita LLazatin leaving behind their two daughters. During the process of the probate of the
wills left by the spouses and the settlements of their estates, Renato Lazatin sought to intervene in the proceedings
claiming to be the adopted child of the spouses.
Issues
Whether or not Mariano Lazatin has the capacity to intervene in the proceedings as the adopted child fo the deacesed
spouses.
Ruling
The court ruled in the negative stating that Renato failed to prove the existence of his adoption by the Lazatin spouses
due to his failure to produce and provide the court with any documentary evidence thet will prove the existence of his
adoption. In this case , the court enunciated that the fact of adoption is never presumed and must be proved by the
person claiming its existence through positive, clear, and convincing evidence.