Upon winding up of a company, secured creditors have priority over the assets secured by their charges. Fixed charges have priority over floating charges regardless of when they were created, unless the floating charge contained a negative pledge clause. Preferential creditors, such as those owed EPF contributions, have priority over floating charges. Unsecured creditors are last in priority order.
Upon winding up of a company, secured creditors have priority over the assets secured by their charges. Fixed charges have priority over floating charges regardless of when they were created, unless the floating charge contained a negative pledge clause. Preferential creditors, such as those owed EPF contributions, have priority over floating charges. Unsecured creditors are last in priority order.
Upon winding up of a company, secured creditors have priority over the assets secured by their charges. Fixed charges have priority over floating charges regardless of when they were created, unless the floating charge contained a negative pledge clause. Preferential creditors, such as those owed EPF contributions, have priority over floating charges. Unsecured creditors are last in priority order.
Upon winding up of a company, secured creditors have priority over the assets secured by their charges. Fixed charges have priority over floating charges regardless of when they were created, unless the floating charge contained a negative pledge clause. Preferential creditors, such as those owed EPF contributions, have priority over floating charges. Unsecured creditors are last in priority order.
Upon winding up, priority of company’s creditors/debts
arises. The assets used as security for the company’s secured creditors can only be used to pay off the debts owed by the company to these creditors ( by liquidate/sell off) General assets of the company that are to be used to settle the unsecured creditors will exclude assets charged to secured creditors. It would be necessary to determine the priority when the company’s assets are insufficient to pay all the company creditors Fixed Charges
When the company had created few fixed charges:
Ranking in order of creation/registration except when the later charge ranking parri passu or in priority of the earlier charge. (Note: A company may create several charges on the same asset) 1st 2nd 3rd Fixed I Fixed II Fixed III Floating Charges
When the company had created few floating charges.
Ranking in order of creation/registration except when the later charge ranking parri passu or in priority of the earlier charge
Re Automatic Bottle Makers : First floating charge
authorises the creation of second floating charge in priority
1st 2nd 3rd
Floating I Floating II Floating III IMPORTANT NOTE
When floating charges crystallise upon winding up - The
crystallization does not affect its nature (as floating charge ) for the purpose of registration nor does it improves its priority over other charges existing at the time of crystallization. i.e. the charges are still considered as floating charges. Fixed and Floating Charges
Fixed charges have the priority over floating charges,
irrespective of time created/registered, provided the fixed charge is registered (refer illustration A)
Except where a negative pledge clause existed in the
instrument of the floating charge and later fixed chargee have knowledge of the negative pledge clause (refer illustration B) Illustration A Company created Fixed I, then Floating I and later Fixed II
1st 3rd 2nd
Fixed I Floating I Fixed II
Illustration B If the Floating I have negative pledge/restrictive clause and Fixed II have knowledge of the clause
1st 2nd 3rd
Fixed I Floating Fixed II Negative Pledge/Restrictive Clause
When company created floating charge, it may still sell or
charge the assets (subjected to a floating charge) in the ordinary course of business. To avoid that a negative pledge is included into a floating charge When there is a negative pledge, the effect is - floating charge would have priority over a later fixed charge Negative Pledge/Restrictive Clause A clause which stipulate that the company is prohibited from creating subsequent charges without the consent of the chargee It is a contractual promise given by a borrowing company that it will not grant further charges without the prior consent of the creditor However if the borrowing company grant further charges without consent of the creditor, subsequent charges are still valid. Negative pledge only affect priority The negative pledge clause will only take effect (i.e affect priority) if the subsequent fixed chargee has notice and knowledge about it.
Companies Act 2016
Sec 352(1) - …a statement of particulars of the charge in the manner prescribed by the Registrar (refer item 7) If the form has been properly filled out indicating that there is a negative pledge/restrictive clause, then constructive notice doctrine applies. However if item 7 is left blank(the form improperly filled) then the constructive notice doctrine would not apply.(actual notice) (Refer case : Tan See King – Part II Effect of registration) Kay Hian & Co(Pte) Ltd [1989] 1MLJ 284 F: A contest between prior floating charge and subsequent fixed charge H: Person asserting priority over a registered floating charge had to prove that they had no knowledge of the negative pledge. In this case such had been lodged with the Registry of Companies and the defendants failed to do so. Affin Bank Bhd v Malayan Banking Bhd [2009] 3 CLJ 320 – Court of Appeal F: Wembley created a charge in favour of Maybank – all assets & undertaking; there is a negative pledge(1st charge) - 2nd charge created over 8 million shares of Wembley in favour of Affin - Affin knows about the 1st charge & negative pledge; through form 34 (CA 1965) - Later when Wembley defaulted, Affin sold the shares - Maybank claimed that the shares are part of its charge and it has priority over Affin’s charge Held : The shares are part of the first charge. Maybank’s charge over the shares had priority over Affin’s charge Preferential Creditors
Preferential creditors may affect the priority of floating charge.
They are actually unsecured creditors who must be paid in priority to other unsecured creditors. Who are preferential creditors; Sec 527(4) : those identified in sec 527(1)(b),(d),(e) AND Sec 527(3) -Money borrowed to pay employee’s salary or vacation leave.
Sec 527(4) : The preferential creditors are entitled to be paid in
priority to the company’s debenture holders of a floating charge Kenneth Teh Ah Kim & Anor [1998] I MLJ 289 H : EPF contribution payable by the company has priority under secs 191(1) & 292(1)(e) over any claim of the debenture holders in the floating charge
NOTE: Payment to the preferential creditors can only be
made out of the assets secured by floating charge and not those secured by fixed charges Unsecured creditors
The unsecured creditors would be last in priority.
Unsecured creditor’s claim would be settled only after the claims of secured creditor are met; unless the unsecured creditor had obtained judgment( judgment debt)
Unsecured creditor would have priority over the floating
charge when obtained judgment against the company before the floating charge crystallize. Eg: Trade creditors- provide goods/services, Rental (landlord)
The 5 Elements of the Highly Effective Debt Collector: How to Become a Top Performing Debt Collector in Less Than 30 Days!!! the Powerful Training System for Developing Efficient, Effective & Top Performing Debt Collectors