Final Assessment
Final Assessment
Final Assessment
Class: BS Bio Sciences/Bio Technology Start time: 11.45, End time: 2.45
Course Name: English for Academic Purposes Course Code: BIO - 1211
Exam Date: 18th June, 2020 Total Marks: 30 Marks
Instructions:
Please answer all the questions in this word document.
In Question No. 1, please select the right option and make it bold.
Q.1 Choose the correct answer from the given options for the following. (05 Marks)
i. A well‐written paragraph should ________
a. focus on a single, coherent idea.
b. consist of logically connected sentences.
c. Both a and b
ii. How long should a paragraph be?
a. Every paragraph should be at least five sentences long.
b. Good paragraphs must be at least one page long.
c. It's okay for paragraphs to vary in length.
iii. Which statement about paragraph length is TRUE?
a. In written dialogue, start a new paragraph with each new speaker.
b. Use short paragraphs when you are analyzing complex ideas or data.
c. Use long paragraphs when you are presenting facts in a technical manual.
iv. Most paragraphs can function as ________
a. miniature essays, each with a main topic and related sentences to support it.
b. thesis statements, summarizing the key arguments in the body of the paper.
c. Both a and b
v. The smooth, logical flow of sentences within a paragraph is called ________
a. paragraph deduction.
b. paragraph coherence.
c. paragraph personality.
vi. How can you strengthen the connection between sentences in a paragraph?
a. Use word patterns such as first, second, third.
b. Repeat a key word, phrase, or synonym.
c. Both a and b
vii. How can you strengthen connections between paragraphs in a paper?
a. Use transitional words or phrases at the beginning of the paragraph.
b. Make sure the first sentence in the next paragraph is extremely long and flowing.
c. Use the phrase “Here's the connection” to let the reader know the concepts are
related.
viii. Which choice shows examples of words and phrases that could signal a cause‐
and‐effect connection?
a. Indeed, very, in fact, extremely, but
b. Therefore, as a result, consequently
c. Above, behind, below, opposite to
ix. The introduction paragraph
a. should always contain a question.
b. should be longer than the body paragraphs.
c. should contain many details and examples.
d. should be shorter than the body paragraphs.
x. The concluding paragraph
a. should restate all your main ideas again.
b. should be your longest paragraph.
c. should begin with a restated thesis.
d. should always end with the restated thesis.
Q.2 Compose an essay on the given situation of at least 500 words to 700 words. (15 Marks)
Write a well-organized, focused essay, in which you narrate a story about a moment in your
life when you encountered fear and obstacles and treated those obstacles as a demon. Try to
narrow your topic to one or two incidents (consisting of mainly a single narrative), and
completely describe it with some underlying purpose (thesis), which may be a lesson you
learned or taught someone else. There should be an honest reason or moral of your
particular story.
ESSAY:
Life is one of the most precious gifts of God, it meant to be lived very cautiously. But
sometimes some incidents happen so unpredictably that left us in a shock. These
incidents are so memorable that they keep on lingering in our mind. These incidents
usually leave a permanent mark in the lives of those who face it and taught the lessons
of life that cannot be erased by any other experience in life. One such sad incident
happened to me a few months ago on the very first day of my second semester at
university whose memories are indelibly etched on my mind.
It was a beautiful rainy morning and also 1st day of my second semester at university I
was very excited. I also carry my guitar with me because we had planned a jamming
session on that day. So, I just start my bike on that rainy morning and went towards
the University. I almost reached to the university but then suddenly I faced a horrible
accident, my bike got slipped on Road due to wet surface and then a truck just drove
over my bike. I had got badly injured; my guitar broke down and bike got damaged. It
was one of the most dangerous moment of my life. This sudden incident left me in fear
and obstacles.
I was badly injured, People gathered around me. One guy just came and start helping
me he just pick me up from the road and help me in sitting on footpath give me water
and inform my parents about this incident on call and when he saw that I am badly
injured he called the ambulance, when ambulance arrived that guy drop me to the
hospital. At hospital doctors take my x-ray and other test for further treatment.
Fortunately, when x-ray report came it was showing that there is no fracture occur but
my tissues got badly damage which was causing extreme pain. Doctor told me for bed
rest for around one week he gave me some medicines and bandages and then
discharge me from the hospital.
When I reach at home, I was badly horrified the scene of the accident were
continuously revolving in my mind which were causing more fear in my mind I was
also a bit sad that my guitar broke down. Anyways, I just off my first week at
university took one-week bed rest, took medicines on time and got recovered from this
injury. Indeed, it was a horrible experience of my life which lead me in extreme fear
but I faced this fear and this situation by Prayers and reading versus of Quran. My all
fear just vanished within 2 3 weeks.
The lesson that I learned from this incident is that teenagers should need to avoid two
wheels vehicles like bike specially in rainy days otherwise they may face incident like
me. after that incident I start using pick and drop van service for university another
thing that I learn is that life is very short and we have no idea when it will be ended.
Spread love in other life and always be ready for help others.
Q.3 Keeping the fundamentals of an abstract (principal objectives, scope of the investigation,
methods used in the research, results, and principal conclusion), write the abstract for the
following research article. (05 marks)
Data Collection:
Questionnaires were administered to teachers and students by the researcher personally, so as to
make clarification when need arose. The researcher made personal visitation to the schools and met
the respective Head teachers and informed them about the research and arranged for data collection.
Data analysis Data was analyzed by use of mean scores to determine perception ant t-test to
determine difference in perception between teachers and students
Results and Discussion:
Perception of Teachers and Students towards Methods used in Teaching English writing Skills. The
findings of teachers and students on perceptions towards the methods used in teaching English
writing skills are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Perception of Teachers and Students towards Methods used in Teaching English writing
Skills.
Respondents Mean score Perspective
Teachers 2.49 Negative
Students 2.32 Negative
The findings reveal that teachers’ perception was negative; the mean score was 2.49 meaning that
teachers are not aware of the appropriate methods used in teaching English writing skills. The
findings also reveal that learners’ perception was negative with a mean score of 2.32 which is lower
than the teachers’ mean. Students are not aware of the methods they are supposed to use in learning
English Writing Skills. Teachers appear not to be informed in terms of the syllabus from the Kenya
Institute of Curriculum Development that contains appropriate methods to be used in terms of
developing English writing skills. The findings reveal that development of writing skills is a
challenge among students. The study implies that performance in English subject may be dismal as a
result of poor methods of content delivery. This has implications for changes in training of teachers
to focus on different methods selected in accordance with objectives, learners’ needs, interests,
beliefs and competencies (Simonson, 2004). The findings concur with the observations made by
Indoshi and Okwara (2011), with the view that majority of teachers who are adequately educated and
professionally trained are capable of producing good results at the end of primary education and also
having a high degree of autonomy and flexibility in the delivery of lessons, but may still fail to have
their learners acquire proficiency in academic skills of writing.
Comparison of Perceptions between Teachers and Students towards Methods used to teach
English writing Skills
To find the differences in perception between teachers and students, a t-test was done on the mean
scores of teachers and students. The findings are presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Test for differences in the average perception scores on the determinants for achievement
95%
Standard error confidence
Mean
Determinant for the mean limits (95% Df p-value
difference
difference CL) on mean
difference
Lower Upper
limit limit
Methods -0.17 0.12 -0.41 0.07 363 0.1594
Mean difference = Average score for the students - Average score for the teachers
The difference in average perception on the methods used in teaching and learning of English
Writing Skills between the teachers and the students is -0.17 (95% CL: -0.41, 0.07). This difference
is statistically non-significant (p-value=0.1594). This means that both the teachers and the students
are similar in their perception on the methods. However, Kang’ahi (2012) found that teachers and
students in their perspective on methods of teaching Kiswahili were different. This comparison
between teachers and students implies that teachers engage students with what they know and
students cannot even learn on their own. The findings show that any kind of learning of writing skills
among students depend on teachers. It shows that traditional methods of teaching writing skills are
still being used, whereby teachers are still the source of everything. As Kutz (1993) observed, there
is excessive trust in teachers towards learners learning without due regard to the learning conditions.
Yang and Huang (2008) argued that although teachers believed that students might benefit from
utilization of appropriate method in instruction, they faced barriers that made integration difficult to
implement. This observation could explain why the current study findings of students’ perception
was negative and similar to other studies like of Al-Senaidi et al (2009) where by the findings
revealed that students had low perception towards some teaching methods used to develop writing
skills.
Conclusion and Implications:
The study reveal that teachers and students had negative perception of methods used in teaching and
learning of English writing skills but the perceptions were not significantly different. It could be the
reason why the students’ performance in English writing skills has been deteriorating. These findings
imply the need for paradigm shift in methodology for teachers to develop interest in writing skills to
find in order to develop competence in written English. Also teacher training institutions may have to
revise their curriculum to develop writing skills.
References:
ABSTRACT:
Making aptitudes are noteworthy for fruitful correspondence. Nevertheless, the
improvement of making aptitudes among understudies depends upon the systems used
in teaching and learning. Late survey of making wellness among understudies in
schools shows that predominant piece of them can't make properly. This raise worry
regarding methodologies used in teaching and learning. Low degrees of making
aptitudes in West Pokot have hugely affected when all is said in done mean scores in
the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) appraisals. The explanation
behind the examination was to choose the perspective on instructors and understudies
towards the methods used in educating and learning of English making capacities in
assistant schools in West Pokot County of Kenya. The objectives of the examination
were first, to set up teachers and understudies’ perspective on methods used in
teaching and learning of forming aptitudes and second, to investigate instructors and
understudy’s impression of procedures used in training and getting the hang of
creating capacities. The assessment masses were 31 teachers of English and 2580
structure four understudies. The model size included 31 instructors of English and 334
structure four understudies picked through fundamental sporadic testing procedure.
Data was accumulated through studies and separated by use of mean and t-test. The
examination revealed that the two instructors and understudies had negative
perception towards procedures used in training and learning of English making
capacities and this was not quantifiably different.