Iso 898-1
Iso 898-1
Iso 898-1
Compared with the 1999 version which has 30 pages, the new standard is almost
double the length, and attempts to apply to the widest possible range of
configurations and designs of such fasteners. It also includes detailed
descriptions of the common tests for the properties that are expected, but as in
the previous standard, does not include properties such as weldability, corrosion
resistance, elevated temperature properties, shear properties and fatigue
resistance.
This standard has had a relatively lengthy passage through the various stages of
approval. In the ISO meeting of 2007 in Stockholm, the working group chairman
had more than 300 written comments on the draft for discussion. It needed a
further meeting, in Switzerland in September 2008, before agreement was
reached, and the final version was voted upon in the first two months of 2009.
Some of the fundamental changes in the standard concern materials. The old 3.6
grade is no longer defined, and while the remaining lower strength grades up to
9.8 have included more flexibility in the choice of materials, there are significant
changes at 10.9 and 12.9 grades.
The old ‘10.9’ grade referring to carbon steel with additives (B, Mn, or Cr) is
gone, and is now designated as ‘10.9’ grade, along with carbon and alloy steels,
all quenched and tempered to give the appropriate properties. However, the
previously allowed low tempering temperature of 340˚c for 10.9 has also been
eliminated, and the minimum temperature is now 425˚c.
There is a new ‘12.9’ grade for carbon steels with additives (B, Mn, Cr, or Mo),
which is now separated from the old ‘12.9’ grade for alloy steel. The minimum
tempering temperature of the ‘12.9’ grade is 380˚c, which previously applied to
alloy steels of 12.9 grade. Now, alloy steels designated ‘12.9’ must be tempered
at 425˚c or above. Some of these changes may have an impact on stockists, who
have parts with the old designations on the shelf.
It is in the area of mechanical test methods that this standard has been most
enlarged, and though the range of properties being tested is the same, there is
much more information on the details of how to test various different designs of
fasteners. The details and requirements of some of the properties have also
been changed, and it would be expected that some of this extra definition may
result in changes to established practice. But the objective of this detail is to bring
more uniformity to the way various fastener types are tested, and the way the test
results are handled, so that there is direct compatibility between results from
different sources.