Land Reforms Karnataka
Land Reforms Karnataka
Land Reforms Karnataka
Changes brought about in the agrarian structure through direct intervention are
characterized as land reforms
Pre-independence:
● Before independence, India was under the despotic rule of British who
encouraged intermediaries to collect more revenues
● However, this was not the beginning as India was under the feudal clutches since
ages
● The Emperors who ruled India divided the lands into Jagirs & handed over
them to Jagirdhars
● These jagirdhars further created intermediaries called zamindars to look after
their jagirs & collect revenues from the peasants who cultivate in those lands
● After British established their paramountcy continued the intermediaries
under Permanent Settlement Act & assigned the lands to Zamindars
permanently to collect the revenues
● The zamindars as intermediaries acquired the ownership rights over huge
land holdings
Zamindari System:
● Zamindari System was introduced by Cornwallis in 1793 through
Permanent Settlement Act
● It was introduced in provinces of Bengal, Bihar, Orissa & UP
● Here, land revenue was collected from the farmers by landlords known as
Zamindars
Ryotwari System:
● Ryotwari System was introduced by Thomas Munro & Alexander Reed in
1820 in Madras, Bombay, parts of Assam & Coorgh provinces of British India
● Land revenue was paid to the state directly by cultivator (ryot)
Mahalwari System:
● The Mahalwari system was introduced by William Bentick in Awadh & Agra
● Later extended to Central Province, North-West Frontier, Punjab, Gangetic Valley
of British India
● In this system, the whole village was treated as one unit for the payment of
the revenue
After independence
● After independence institutional reforms were needed to change the pattern of
feudal society to socialist
● A committee for the first time was appointed in 1949 to initiate the land
reforms
● The committee was named as 'Congress Agrarian Reforms Committee' also
known as Kumarappan committee headed by J.C.Kumarappan
● It was the beginning of land reforms in India
● The committee recommended radical institutional reforms; it recommended the
abolition of Zamindari System
● From the year 1949 to 1951, the states in India – independently brought into
effect the zamindari abolition act
● Uttar Pradesh was the first state in India brought into effect the law related
to abolition of zamindari system
● Subsequently states like Madras (later called Tamil Nadu), Bihar, MP, etc
implemented the Zamindari abolition act almost on the lines of UP Zamindari
abolition Act.
Provisions Challenged
● The above provisions were challenged in the court, claiming they were
against the Article 31 of the Constitution of India
● Subsequently, government made changes to the Constitution
● Golaknath, a zamindar from Punjab challenged the amendment of the
Constitution and confiscation of his lands in the Court of law
● Supreme Court gave judgment in favour of Golaknath, it ruled that parliament
cannot amend the Constitution
● However, subsequently to accommodate the Zamindar Abolition Act & to
bring land reforms more freely & effectively the Article 31 of the
constitution was repealed
2. Tenancy Reforms:
It included
a. Regulation of Rent
b. Security of Tenure
c. Ownership Rights for Tenants
● Ensuring fair rent, security of the tenure, converting the tenants into owner
cultivators were major objectives
● Surplus lands confiscated from Zamindars were given to tenants on a minimal
amount which was 8 to 10 times of annual rent
● The lands were given to only those tenants who were paying the rent in the form
of cash
● Bargadars or Sharecroppers were those tenants who pay the rent in the
form of kind and there was no accommodation to them in the act and
hence there was no advantage to them with regard to availing the land
● However, Sharecroppers were accommodated in Tenancy acts subsequently
● Terms & conditions between the landlords & the peasants were always oral
● It has become difficult to identify the tenure of tenants worked in respective lands
● The fair rent objective of the tenancy reforms was never implemented
Meanwhile, towards the end of 1955, the movement took a new form, that of
Gramdan or ‘donation of village’.
Introduction
● The increase in the agriculture production, distribution of wealth, and
proposals to revise rules pertaining to the land in the interest of the public
is called the land reform
Its aims:
1. To procure for the tiller the ownership of the soil
2. To bring about equality in income & wealth
3. To improve agriculture production
4. To distribute the land above the ceiling limit among the landless
For the purpose of studies the land reform movement can be divided into:
a. Till 1947
b. From 1947 to 1956
c. From 1956 and onwards
Upto 1947
● The statutes regarding the land reform can be traced back to the times of the
traditional palegars, Mysore rulers, Huder Ali, Tipu Sultan, Purnaiah and even to
the British period
● The rules passed by them about the holding of the lands may not be considered
as Land reforms statutes
The B.D. Jatti Report was placed before the assembly in June 1958 to seek the
opinion of the members.
● The matter was discussed for 10 days & finally entrasted to the select
committee consisting of 44 members, selected from both the houses
● The committee met 64 times, held detailed discussion & sent the final report to
the government in March 1961
Important sections
● Section 63 focused on the ceiling imposed on landholding
● Section 79A imposed restrictions prohibiting non-agriculturists from the
acquisition of land. Firms and individuals from a non-agricultural or non-farming
background, earning income more than 25 lakhs in INR, are not allowed to
purchase any agricultural land in Karnataka
● Section 79B stated persons or firms related to farming or agriculturists can
purchase, hold and own agricultural lands
● Section 79C defined the penalty to be imposed for falsely claiming ownership of
agricultural land. Violating Sections 79A & 79B allowed the revenue department
to investigate and impose actions
● Section 80 barred the transfer of land to non-agriculturists
● Section 81 Whoever contravenes any provision shall be punished with
conviction or with fine or by both by a magistrate
● Similar restrictions were imposed on leasing and mortgage of agricultural land.
● Criticism poured in from all directions when the land reform Act was passed in
1964. Certain suggestions & proposals were made
● The central government also pondered over it & suggested to make it purposeful
and meaningful
● Consequently the 1961 Act was revised and amended
Amendments included:
1. The decision of the Land Tribunal cannot be questioned by any district
court. A writ can be filled only in High court if its decision is not
satisfactory
2. Tenancy land was classified into 3 categories – A,B and C&D
3. The tenants, in order to take possession of the land belonging to the ABC group
had to pay 20 times of total produce in 20 years in equal installments, & 20 times
of the total produce belonging to the D group
● He will have the possession of the land after the complete payments.
4. Those people whose income is >12,000 from non-agricultural professions or
source had no right to buy the land
5. The land ceiling is based on the classification of the land. One can have
● 'A' group lands up to 10 acres
● 'B' group up to 20 acres
● 'C' & 'D' groups up to 40 acres
6. No ceiling limit was fixed for coffee, tea & rubber plantation
The Karnataka Land Reform is said to be the best & the man responsible for it
was Devaraj Urs
Salient Features
● With the exemption of the army and the navy personnel, the tenancy and Inamti
lands belonged to the government. Hence, concessions that were extended to
Hindu widows, minorities, self cultivators & charitabe institutions were all
annulled.
● The wage earner or the watchman cannot be considered and a tenant
● The right of possession of the land accorded by the previous reform was
withdrawn
● If the land was to be given for tenancy, the owner would lose the right over the
land
● The land tribunal court was the final authority to settle the dispute that would
arise between the tenant and the owner
● The government had no right to revise it
● The Judicial Committee were being supported by local members & bureaucratic
officials
The Act that has facilitated the removal of certain restrictions on purchasing &
owning agricultural land
● The ceiling on holding and acquisition of agricultural land has been increased
from 10 units to 20 units
● This threshold is applicable for a person who is not a family member or who does
not have a family or for families with 4 members
● For a family with more than 5 members, the ceiling has an additional 4 units
allotted for each member, but not to exceed 40 units.
● 1 unit of land is equivalent to 5.4 acres
● A new provision, Section 80-A, ensures that the changes do not apply to any
property owners who have received their land under the Karnataka
Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Act (Prohibition of Transfer Of Certain
Lands), 1978
● Hence it will not affect individuals belonging to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled
Tribe. Agricultural land owned by them will continue to remain as farmland
Dalit groups have been demanding removal of the time bar for claims on lands that
were originally granted to them but were subsequently sold or taken over by others.
● State government has tabled a Bill that facilitates the removal of the time bar on
persons from SC/ST communities to stake claim to land granted to them by the
state but which was acquired by third parties without their active awareness.
● It will have a significant impact on land ownership in the state
● The Karnataka Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Prohibition of
Transfer of Certain Lands (Amendment) Bill, 2023 was tabled in the state
legislature on July 19
● A special Cabinet meeting approved the amendment of the PTCL Act to remove
the time limit for the land owner to file a complaint under Section 5(1) of the Act in
case the land allocated to the SCs & STs has been transferred without the
permission of the government
● Budget on July 7 has stated that the government was intent on amending the
PTCL Act
Limitation:
● But due to a lack of clarity & understanding between the judiciary &
administration there exists this large number of cases still hanging in the
balance.
● Currently over 10000 cases are pending before the office of the Deputy
Commissioners across the State Karnataka