SEBI
SEBI
SEBI
For Mains: Statutory Bodies, Quasi Judicial Bodies, Capital Market, Issues with SEBI and Way Forward.
Why in News?
Recently, Madhabi Puri Buch, former whole-time member of the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI), has been appointed as its new chairperson — the first woman to head the market
regulator. She will hold the position for three years.
Earlier in January 2022, SEBI launched Saa₹thi – a mobile app on investor education.
What is SEBI?
About:
SEBI is a Statutory Body (a Non-Constitutional body which is set up by a
Parliament) established on 12th April, 1992 in accordance with the provisions of the
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
The basic functions of SEBI is to protect the interests of investors in securities and to
promote and regulate the securities market.
The headquarters of SEBI is situated in Mumbai. The regional offices of SEBI are
located in Ahmedabad, Kolkata, Chennai and Delhi.
Background:
Before SEBI came into existence, Controller of Capital Issues was the regulatory
authority, it derived authority from the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947.
In April, 1988 the SEBI was constituted as the regulator of capital markets in India
under a resolution of the Government of India.
Initially SEBI was a non statutory body without any statutory power.
It became autonomous and given statutory powers by SEBI Act 1992.
SEBI Board consists of a Chairman and several other whole time and part time members.
SEBI also appoints various committees, whenever required to look into the pressing issues of
that time.
Further, a Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has been constituted to protect the interest of
entities that feel aggrieved by SEBI’s decision.
SAT consists of a Presiding Officer and two other Members.
It has the same powers as vested in a civil court. Further, if any person feels aggrieved
by SAT’s decision or order can appeal to the Supreme Court.
//
In recent years SEBI's role became more complex, the capital markets regulator is at a
crossroads.
There is excessive focus on regulation of market conduct and lesser emphasis on
prudential regulation.
SEBI’s statutory enforcement powers are greater than its counterparts in the US and the
UK as it is armed with far greater power to inflict serious economic injury.
It can impose serious restraints on economic activity, this is done based on suspicion, leaving
it to those affected to shoulder the burden of disproving the suspicion, somewhat like preventive
detention.
Its legislative powers are near absolute as the SEBI Act grants wide discretion to make
subordinate legislation.
The component of prior consultation with the market and a system of review of regulations to see
if they have met the articulated purpose is substantially missing. As a result, the fear of the
regulator is widespread.
Regulation, either rules or enforcement, is far from perfect, particularly in areas like insider
trading.
The Securities offering documents are extraordinarily bulky and have substantially been
reduced to formal compliance rather than resulting in substantive disclosures of high quality.
Way Forward
There is need of an attitudinal change, indeed, hundreds of inputs about the market
being full of crooks necessitating a crackdown and severe intervention would be received.
The foremost objective of SEBI should be cleaning up the policy space in this area of the
market.
SEBI must give special attention to human resources and matters within the organization.
SEBI must encourage lateral entry to draw the best talent.
Alignment and fitment of senior employees upon merger of the Forward Markets Commission into
Sebi remains an open area of work.
Enforcement can be strengthened with continuous monitoring and improving market
intelligence.
India’s financial markets are still segmented. One regulator can’t be blamed for another’s failure
when the remit over a financial product overlaps.
In this context a unified financial regulator makes eminent sense to remove both
overlap and excluded boundaries.
Source: IE