2022 SaaS Performance Reporting Benchmarks
2022 SaaS Performance Reporting Benchmarks
2022 SaaS Performance Reporting Benchmarks
Reporting Benchmarks
How companies are tracking and analyzing
the most important metrics
Introduction 04
1. Key Findings 05
About Mosaic 23
23%
21%
16%
14%
13%
6%
5%
3%
<$ $ $ $ $ $ $ >$
5M 5-10M 10-20M 20-50M 50-100M 100-250M 250M-1B 1B
Participant Profile
By ACV
20%
19%
16%
15%
14%
6%
4% 4%
3%
<$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ >$
1K 1-5K 5-10K 10-25K 25-50K 50-100K 100-250K 250K-1M 1M
Participant Profile
By Solution Type
61%
28%
6%
3% 4%
Participant Profile
By Financing Source
38%
14%
13%
11%
10%
9%
6%
Participant Profile
By Title Level
29%
20%
19%
15%
13%
5%
Participant Profile
By Department
35%
21%
16%
10%
8%
5%
Real-time analytics and on-demand reporting have become prerequisites for finance
to earn a strategic seat at the table.
But how many organizations have really achieved the necessary level of efficiency in
metric calculations to meet those two prerequisites?
Throughout November and December 2021, we conducted research alongside The SaaS
CFO and RevOps Squared to answer that question.
Our survey aimed to reveal how subscription-based B2B tech companies capture,
calculate, and analyze their performance metrics. It included questions about the
speed and efficiency of metric calculation processes, the metrics that are most
important, the different technologies companies use, challenges of calculating metrics,
and more.
We believe finance’s position at the intersection of all business data can help un-
lock strategic growth opportunities for a company at large—but only if finance can
efficiently make sense of all that data and dig deep enough to identify the right
insights at the right time. The research here highlights opportunities for finance teams
to improve their processes to create competitive advantages in the ways they calculate,
track, and analyze their performance metrics.
‘‘
We have to think about how it positively affects decisions made by
team leads if they have access to on-demand financial information.
What it means is that they’ll have the data to make better, more
informed decisions. It will save them time and change their view
of finance’s role. ”
Metrics are not available quick enough for strategic planning processes
Only 6% of companies report having performance metrics available in less than one day
while 54% don’t have metrics available for six or more days after request. This leads companies
to plan around stale numbers, especially for the 38% that have a monthly metric reporting
cadence.
Narrowing the focus of your performance reporting to the metrics that matter will
streamline reporting and keep your business aligned on growth goals.
The specific metrics you choose to report on will depend on your business model,
funding needs/investor expectations, and your growth stage. However, there are
certain SaaS metrics that are nearly universally valuable.
Our survey looked to reveal the metrics that matter across five main categories—
company-wide performance metrics, customer acquisition metrics, customer retention
metrics, customer expansion metrics, and sales metrics.
‘‘
Where finance teams go wrong is when they build reports to answer
anything and everything about the business. Effective reports focus
on the three to five KPIs that matter most to your organization. From
there, you can start digging into analyses that reveal deeper insights.”
Could Go Deeper
The company-wide metrics you track should give executives and investors a high-level view of your growth
trajectory and the overall health of your organization. At the most basic level, this comes down to revenue
growth, cash flow, and profitability.
That’s why it’s no surprise that ARR growth (89%), gross margin (89%), and revenue growth (88%) are the most
common company-wide performance metrics. However, it’s somewhat surprising that 11-12% of respondents
aren’t capturing these core financial metrics.
11%-12%
Respondents
don’t capture
26% 65% 89% these metrics
Rule of 40 Department Expense ARR Growth
as % of Revenue
Cash runway (67%) and net cash burn (74%) are also critical metrics to track for companies growing through
external investment.
These two metrics are especially important for earlier-stage startups that might be pre-revenue or are
prioritizing hypergrowth over profitability (less so as your company matures and free cash flow becomes the
priority).
The fact that 35% of respondents don’t track department expenses as a percentage of revenue could mean
that company-wide metrics are too broad. Presenting department-level composition data can uncover sus-
tainability issues as your company grows. And the sooner you provide visibility into those issues, the sooner
board members can advise on a fix and executives can investigate resource allocation issues.
But CAC isn’t such a valuable metric on its own. Finance leaders, executives, and go-to-market partners
need additional context to make strategic decisions about acquisition.
One way to add more context is to break CAC calculations out by channel to get a better understanding of
which specific activities are most efficient. Teams also add context by tracking supplemental metrics like cus-
tomer lifetime value (72%) and CAC payback period (69%). But there’s an opportunity to go a step further by
focusing more on efficiency metrics.
Our survey found that efficiency metrics like the magic number (42%), CAC ratio (42%), and sales efficiency
(47%) see low adoption. These types of metrics are critical for understanding the true effectiveness of sales
and marketing activities, which helps your teams make better strategic decisions during planning cycles.
Metrics Have a
Segmentation Problem
There’s a critical turning point in the early years of any company—that first year where you come up against
meaningful customer renewal dates. Mastering the go-to-market motion and driving customer acquisition
means very little to a SaaS company if it can’t retain the accounts.
This is why gross dollar retention (73%), gross dollar churn (70%), customer logo churn (74%), and customer
logo retention (65%) have high adoption.
The lack of adoption for customer cohort analysis (particularly by gross dollar retention) could be an issue.
Segmenting the data by cohorts helps you and your business partners understand more about which
customers have churned in the past and which ones are mostly likely to churn in the future. That information
helps the company proactively address product- and service-related issues to increase retention and overall
business performance.
The survey results show that there’s room to go beyond net revenue retention for more context about
customer expansion.
Like with customer retention, adoption of customer cohort analysis for expansion is low and presents an
opportunity to go deeper with customer data. But expansion CAC ratio (35%) is an opportunity to look at
performance in this category differently. Seeing whether or not your upsell activities are efficient can give
you insights into ways both sales and customer success can unlock new levels of business growth.
64%
of companies aren’t
tracking their sales
rep ramp time
Without an ability to normalize AE start dates to time zero and evaluate ramp times, you may struggle to
accurately build headcount plans and plan your top-line revenue. Individual performance metrics like annu-
al contract value, pipeline by sales rep, and sales cycle time are crucial, but sales-led companies need the
big-picture perspective that AE ramp time offers.
The “how” of calculating performance metrics comes down to four key questions that we asked in our survey:
ONE TWO
THREE FOUR
‘‘
Simply put, without alignment, a company will miss its numbers…
The best finance teams are viewed as thought partners for other
departments that help them build conviction to make better
decisions. I used to say my job as CFO is not to say ‘no,’ but to have
us both feel good about our decision, whether it’s a ‘yes’ or ‘no.’”
Our survey found that finance teams are the primary owners of metric calculations across all key categories—
company-wide metrics (61%), acquisition metrics (58%), retention metrics (59%), expansion metrics (61%),
and sales metrics (53%).
The takeaway here isn’t that one team should necessarily own metrics over another.
Instead, it’s that the finance team, which sits at the intersection of all necessary data to calculate the metrics,
has to stay aligned with each functional department.
There needs to be joint tooling that works cross-functionally to support that alignment. It’s not good enough
for finance to have walled-off systems that prevent departmental leaders from understanding the full story
behind the numbers. For example, how can marketing know its true customer acquisition cost without rolling
salary data into the equation?
Leaning on new tools to create a single source of truth makes the metric calculation process more collabora-
tive and empowers departmental leaders to engage with real-time data and analytics on their own.
51%
40%
7%
2%
0%
Even in sales where metric accountability is fundamental to the overall success of a business, just 28% of
respondents say finance is very well aligned with the team. The results are even lower for marketing (15%)
and customer success (21%).
The gap between alignment expectations and reality shows that there’s room for improvement when it
comes to collaboration between finance and the rest of the business.
BI Platform 31%
Specialized
20%
FP&A Tool
Core Financial
26%
Platform
Google
44%
Sheets
Excel 75%
Among the non-spreadsheet options, business intelligence platforms see the most adoption for calculating
metrics. But the amount of money, effort, and technical expertise required to implement and configure BI
(even to calculate simple metrics) may limit adoption.
Specialized FP&A tools (aside from Anaplan or Adaptive) offer more accessibility than BI platforms. But
because this is more of an emerging market, many of these tools are still in early adoption.
Down Performance
Reporting?
Improving the speed and efficiency of metric reporting isn’t as simple as making one
new hire, implementing one new tool, or revamping one broken workflow. There could
be any number of challenges preventing teams from streamlining the process. But
our survey found that there are three main issues that stand out.
No common
definition of 16%
formula(s)
No common
definition of 34%
metrics
Misalignment of
35%
stakeholders
Quality of
63%
source data
Source data in
68%
multiple places
No single resource
36%
responsible
Manual
69%
process
For 69% of respondents, manual processes are the main road- Data quality issues (63%) and multiple source systems (68%)
block to greater efficiency. Given the predominance of spread- make it more difficult to calculate metrics in spreadsheets. As
sheets, this outcome may be predictable. But the other two companies scale, data complexity and volume grow, which in
primary challenges offer more context. turn make each of these obstacles more problematic.
Rather, every organization’s unique mix of people, process- But the sooner you put a framework for financial rigor in place,
es, and technology results in a particular cadence for metric the better off your company will be.
calculations.
30%
20%
11%
1%
Does It Take to
Calculate Metrics?
As finance teams face more pressure to keep pace with rapid
business change, stakeholders expect faster access to key
performance metrics.
40%
20% 20%
9%
6%
5%
< 1 Day 1-5 Days 6-10 Days 11-15 Days 15-20 Days 21-30 Days
Our survey found that 46% of businesses are able to report on The companies that take two weeks or more to calculate per-
performance metrics less than a week after a period closes. formance metrics face a significant disadvantage. If teams don’t
The ideal scenario would be for everyone to have visibility in get visibility into what happened last month until 10, 15, or 20+
less than a day like 6% of respondents. But getting to the point days into the next month, course correcting becomes an uphill
where you have visibility into performance metrics in less than battle. And it only gets harder the longer it takes to calculate
a week is a good goal. your metrics. This is why it’s so important to capitalize on any
opportunity to automate processes and make metrics available
as quickly as possible.
ONE
Segment Data for
Deeper Insight
Cohort analysis is surprisingly But segmenting your data is critical for understanding the
uncommon. “why” behind your numbers and running root cause analyses.
For example, if you segment blended CAC data, you can see the
behavior of cohorts on one pricing plan versus another and gain
insight into why certain groups underperform or churn. Having
the flexibility to see how specific customer cohorts perform can
reveal insights that inform the product roadmap, sales strategy,
marketing activities, customer success investments, and more.
TWO
Automate the
Low-Hanging Fruit
Manual processes remain the primary This isn’t a new problem, which is why automation has been a
roadblock for finance teams. priority for finance and accounting teams for years. Heading into
2022, now is the time to commit to new tools and process au-
tomation to improve low-hanging fruit like data collection and
certain aspects of the month-end close.
FOUR
Track More Advanced
Efficiency Metrics
Efficiency ratios are some of the least This may be because they’re more complicated to calculate
common according to the report. due to source data existing in disconnected systems. There’s an
opportunity to focus more on efficiency metrics like CAC ratio
and sales efficiency to better understand performance across
departments.
FIVE
Make Metrics More
Transparent to the Org
Transparency in financial metrics can But just 26% of respondents share performance metrics with
help increase employee engagement. the entire company, instead just focusing on executives and the
board. Being more transparent with the numbers can lead to
more collaborative planning processes that improve the overall
health of an organization.
SIX
Improve Data Integrity
for a Strong Foundation
Quality of source data is a problem for Finance is in the perfect position to spearhead the creation of
63% of survey respondents. an intentional data architecture that fixes this issue. Data integ-
rity issues can compound and silently crush any business, which
is why this opportunity should be a priority.
Efficient reporting is one aspect of a modern strategic finance function. It’s the foundation for real-time ana-
lytics and agile planning, which are essential to finance’s success as a true strategic partner.
Mosaic is the first Strategic Finance Platform that creates a connective tissue between
Get in touch
disparate source systems, automates even the most complex performance metrics, and
provides flexible tools for financial forecasting.
Want to learn how Mosaic can help you embrace strategic finance?
Visit www.mosaic.tech for more information, or send a note to [email protected].
Today Mosaic is deployed by some of the fastest growing companies, helping them align, collabo-
rate and plan for the future.