Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 97 views

    Evaluation Form For Auditors

    Uploaded by

    Federico Domingo
    This document provides a form for evaluating the performance of quality management system auditors. It rates auditors on their planning, execution of audits, reporting of results, and personal attributes. The form contains criteria in different areas that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Based on the total rating, the evaluation provides recommendations that range from mentoring new auditors for outstanding teams to requiring further training for poor performers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Evaluation Form For Auditors

    Uploaded by

    Federico Domingo
    97 views2 pages
    This document provides a form for evaluating the performance of quality management system auditors. It rates auditors on their planning, execution of audits, reporting of results, and personal attributes. The form contains criteria in different areas that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Based on the total rating, the evaluation provides recommendations that range from mentoring new auditors for outstanding teams to requiring further training for poor performers.

    Original Description:

    EVALUATION FORM FOR AUDITORS

    Original Title

    EVALUATION FORM FOR AUDITORS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a form for evaluating the performance of quality management system auditors. It rates auditors on their planning, execution of audits, reporting of results, and personal attributes. The form contains criteria in different areas that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Based on the total rating, the evaluation provides recommendations that range from mentoring new auditors for outstanding teams to requiring further training for poor performers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    97 views2 pages

    Evaluation Form For Auditors

    Uploaded by

    Federico Domingo
    This document provides a form for evaluating the performance of quality management system auditors. It rates auditors on their planning, execution of audits, reporting of results, and personal attributes. The form contains criteria in different areas that are rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Based on the total rating, the evaluation provides recommendations that range from mentoring new auditors for outstanding teams to requiring further training for poor performers.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    TEAM EVALUATION FORM FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDITORS

    Instructions: Rate the audit team and the audit team’s output according to the listed criteria where 5 is Outstanding
    (O), 4 is Very Satisfactory (VS), 3 is Satisfactory (S), 2 is Unsatisfactory (U) and 1 is Poor (P).

    Team Leader:___________________________ Audit Date:__________________________


    Members:
    1.)____________________________________
    2.)____________________________________
    3.)____________________________________

    1. Audit Planning and Preparation


    Item No Criteria Rating Comments
    1.1 Coordination with auditee
    1.1.2 Auditee audit notice prepared 1 2 3 4 5
    1.1.3 Completeness of audit itinerary 1 2 3 4 5
    1.2 Audit Team coordination (Team leader)
    1.2.1 Conduct of audit team coordination and briefing 1 2 3 4 5
    1.2.2 Identification of members' assignment 1 2 3 4 5

    2. Audit Execution
    Item No Criteria Rating Comments
    2.1 Opening Meeting (Team leader)
    2.1.1 Introduction of audit members 1 2 3 4 5
    2.1.2 Discussion of the scope/purpose of the audit 1 2 3 4 5
    2.1.3 Answered/clarified all questions from auditees 1 2 3 4 5
    2.2 Auditing Skills/Knowledge/Technique
    2.2.1 Familiarity with auditee’s procedures/process 1 2 3 4 5
    2.2.2 Checking of quality objectives/performance data 1 2 3 4 5
    2.2.3 Checking of previous audit reports/results 1 2 3 4 5
    2.2.4 Verifying corrections/corrective actions as needed 1 2 3 4 5
    2.2.4.1 Ability to make a judgment on previous audit
    status (close or remain open for next audit 1 2 3 4 5
    verification)
    2.2.5 Evidence gathering technique 1 2 3 4 5
    2.2.6 Maintaining audits within the scope of the
    1 2 3 4 5
    enrolled process
    2.3 Audit Interview Strategy
    2.3.1 Use of appropriate terminology for the process
    1 2 3 4 5
    audited
    2.3.1 Use of questioning, open-ended questions, etc. 1 2 3 4 5
    2.3.2 Use of suitable checklist/staying on scope 1 2 3 4 5
    2.4 Closing Meeting (Team leader)
    2.4.1 Summarization of findings 1 2 3 4 5
    2.4.2 Identification of system weakness 1 2 3 4 5
    2.4.3 Commendation of positive findings 1 2 3 4 5

    Page 1 of 2
    TEAM EVALUATION FORM FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AUDITORS

    3. Audit Reporting (Rate the team report based on the identified criteria)
    Item No Criteria Rating Comments
    Quality of Audit Results/Reports (Clear
    3.1 1 2 3 4 5
    and concise)
    Completeness of Audit
    3.2 1 2 3 4 5
    Results/Reports
    Relevance of findings/CARs
    3.3 1 2 3 4 5
    (clear/concise/supported by evidence)
    3.4 Findings are correctly classified 1 2 3 4 5
    3.5 Timeliness of issuance of CARs 1 2 3 4 5

    4. Principles of Auditing (Rate the team how they observe the criteria)
    Item No Criteria Rating Comments
    5.1 Integrity 1 2 3 4 5
    5.2 Fair Presentation 1 2 3 4 5
    5.3 Due Professional Care 1 2 3 4 5
    5.4 Independence 1 2 3 4 5
    5.5 Evidence-Based Approach 1 2 3 4 5

    5. Auditors Attributes (Rate the team how they observe the criteria)
    Item No Criteria Rating Comments
    6.1 Ethical 1 2 3 4 5
    6.2 Open-mindedness 1 2 3 4 5
    6.3 Diplomatic 1 2 3 4 5
    6.4 Observant 1 2 3 4 5
    6.5 Versatility 1 2 3 4 5
    6.6 Tenaciousness 1 2 3 4 5
    6.7 Decisiveness 1 2 3 4 5
    6.8 Self-reliance 1 2 3 4 5

    Team Evaluation/Rating: Action


    [ ] Oustanding (O) 4.2 - 5 The team is recommended to mentor new auditors
    [ ] Very Satisfactory (VS) 3.4 – 4.199 The team is qualified to participate as auditor in the next intra-unit IA
    [ ] Satisfactory (S) 2.6 – 3.399 Recommend to participate as auditor or observer in the next audit
    [ ] Unsatisfactory (U) 1.800 – 2.599 Recommend to join/participate in another training on QMS auditing (Audit
    failure and the DOEwide observing the audit will provide a separate audit
    report to the IA Chairperson)
    [ ] Poor (P) 1.0 – 1.799 Recommend to join/participate in another training on QMS auditing (Audit
    failure and the DOEwide observing the audit will provide a separate audit
    report to the IA Chairperson. The audit chairperson may recommend
    conduct of audit as needed)

    Evaluator:

    ___________________________
    Name and Signature

    Date:__________________
    Page 2 of 2

    You might also like