Basic Concepts in Medical Informatics
Basic Concepts in Medical Informatics
Basic Concepts in Medical Informatics
These include:
References This article cites 18 articles, 10 of which can be accessed free at:
http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/56/11/808#BIBL
Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the
service top right corner of the article
Topic collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections
Notes
808
GLOSSARY
This glossary defines terms used in the comparatively • There is general agreement on what the term
young science of medical informatics. It is hoped that it means and how it is used.
will be of interest to both novices and professionals in • There is value in attempting to define the term,
even though there may be debate about it.
the field. We trust this list of terms will be informative
.......................................................................... for novices and encourage discussion among
medical informatics professionals, particularly on
terms for which there is no widespread agree-
M
edical informatics is the study and appli-
cation of methods to improve the man- ment*. For readers who are interested in pursuing
agement of patient data, clinical knowl- the subject further, additional resources are cited
edge, population data, and other information at the end of the list.
relevant to patient care and community health. It
is a young science, which emerged in the decades ALGORITHM
after the invention of the digital computer in the A process for carrying out a complex task broken
1940s. Mechanical computing in medicine had a down into simple decision and action steps. Often
much earlier origin, in the 19th century, with assists the requirements analysis process carried out
Herman Hollerith’s “punched-card data- before programming.
processing system” originally used for the US
census and subsequently developed to support
surveys in public health and epidemiology.1 This BIOINFORMATICS
example reflects the multidisciplinary nature of The use of medical informatics methods to facilitate
medical informatics, which interacts with various research in molecular biology.
fields, including the clinical sciences, the public
health sciences (for example, epidemiology and CHECKLIST
health services research) as well as cognitive, A type of clinical decision tool: a form listing one or
computing, and information sciences. more items of patient data to be collected before,
Given the diversity of backgrounds of medical during or after an encounter; can be paper or
informatics workers, newcomers can easily be computer based.
confused by the jargon used in the field. An intro-
duction to basic concepts would therefore be use-
CLINICAL CODING SYSTEM (CLINICAL
ful to those interested in learning more about
medical informatics. In recent years, various
THESAURUS, CONTROLLED
branches of the discipline have appeared, includ- VOCABULARY)
ing public health informatics, consumer health A limited list of preferred terms from which the
informatics, and clinical informatics. In a debate user can draw one or more to express a concept
on whether medical informatics and these such as patient data, a disease or drug name, etc.
branches are distinct disciplines, Shortliffe and An alphanumeric code corresponding to the term
Ozbolt argued that “informatics is built on a is then stored by the computer. Synonyms or close
re-usable and widely applicable set of methods matches to each preferred term are usually avail-
that are common to all health science disciplines, able and map onto the same internal codes. This
and that ‘medical informatics’ continues to be a approach makes it easier for a computer to
useful name for a composite core discipline that analyse data than the use of free text words or
should be studied by all students, regardless of phrases. Examples of clinical coding systems
their health profession orientation.”2 3 Our defini- include SNOMED-CT (divergent codes used to
tions of the various branches of medical infor- capture patient data), MeSH (terms used to index
matics below reflect this. biomedical literature) and ICD-10 (convergent
One or more of the following criteria were used disease codes for international comparisons, with
to select terms included in this list of concepts: specific rules to guide coders). Clinical coding
• The term is likely to be novel to epidemiologists systems play a key part in epidemiological studies
See end of article for and public health professionals. and health service research, from the use of
authors’ affiliations • An existing word may have a widely accepted MeSH terms to conduct literature searches for
....................... meaning but is used in a specific way in the systematic reviews to studies that use ICD codes
Correspondence to: medical informatics field. to classify and compare diseases. To prevent
Professor J C Wyatt, • The term is relevant to epidemiology and pub- information loss, it is vital that the terms and
Department of Medical
Informatics, Academic
lic health.
Medical Centre, University • It is essential to understanding medical infor- .................................................
of Amsterdam, matics.
Netherlands; * Notes to the list of concepts: Italic means “see also”.
[email protected] • It is enduring—that is, not about some Synonyms are mentioned in parentheses, after the core
....................... transient technology. term.
www.jech.com
Downloaded from jech.bmj.com on 21 November 2006
codes are never changed or dropped, only added to. Obsolete DATA QUALITY
terms can be marked as such to deter inappropriate use. Con- The degree to which data items are accurate, complete,
tinuing maintenance is needed to incorporate new terms and relevant, timely, sufficiently detailed, appropriately repre-
codes for new concepts and synonyms as they arise. sented (for example, consistently coded using a clinical coding
system), and retain sufficient contextual information to
CLINICAL DATA SYSTEM support decision making.
Any information system concerned with the capture, process-
ing, or communication of patient data.4 DATABASE
A collection of data in machine readable format organised so
CLINICAL DECISION TOOL that it can be retrieved or processed automatically by compu-
Any mechanical, paper, or electronic aid that collects or proc- ter. A flat file database is organised like a card file, with many
esses data from an individual patient to generate output that records (cards) each including one or more fields (data items).
aids clinical decisions during the doctor-patient encounter.5 A relational database is organised as one or more related
Examples include decision support systems, paper or computer tables, each containing columns and rows. Data are organised
reminders and checklists, which are potentially useful tools in in a database according to a schema or data model; some items
public health informatics, as well as other branches of medical are often coded using a clinical coding system.
informatics.
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (COMPUTER DECISION
CLINICAL INFORMATION AID)
Organised patient data or medical knowledge used to make clini- A type of clinical decision tool: a computer system that uses two
cal decisions (adapted from Shortliffe et al6); may also include or more items of patient data to generate case specific or
directory information. Many activities in public health and encounter specific advice.11 Examples include computer risk
epidemiology (for example, surveillance systems, cohort stud- assessors to estimate cardiovascular disease risk12 and the
ies to assess the effects of a risk factor of disease, and clinical Leeds Acute Abdominal Pain system, which aided the diagno-
trials to estimate efficacies of new treatments) entail the sis of conditions causing such pain.13 Evidence adaptive deci-
organisation of such data (for example, case report forms for sion support systems are a type of decision aid with a knowl-
individual patients) into useable information (for example, edge base that is constructed from and continually adapts to
incidence of notifiable cases of disease from surveillance pro- new research based and practice based evidence.14
grammes and summary evidence from cohort studies or clini-
cal trials, expressed as odds ratios for certain harmful and DECISION TREE
beneficial outcomes). See also: information. A way to model a complex decision process as a tree with
branches representing all possible intermediate states or final
CLINICAL INFORMATICS outcomes of an event. The probabilities of each intermediate
The use of medical informatics methods to aid management of state or final outcome and the perceived utilities of each are
patients using an interdisciplinary approach, including the combined to attach expected utilities to each outcome. The
clinical and information sciences.6 science of drawing decision trees and assessing utilities is
called decision analysis.
COMMUNICATION
The exchange of information between agents (human or auto- DEMONSTRATION STUDY
mated) face to face or using paper or electronic media.7 Study that establishes a relation—which may be associational
Requires the use of a shared language and understanding or or causal—between a set of measured variables. In epidemiol-
common ground. ogy, cohort studies, randomised trials, and blind comparisons
of a test with a gold standard are typical demonstration
studies.6 15 See also measurement studies.
COMPUTER VISION (IMAGE INTERPRETATION)
The use of computer techniques to assist in the interpretation
of images, such as mammograms. DIRECTORY INFORMATION
Information specific to an organisation or service that is useful
in managing public health services, health care services, or
CONFIDENTIALITY (PROTECTING PRIVACY) patients. Examples include a phone directory, a lab handbook
The policies restricting access to a person’s data to those whom listing available tests and specimens to use, and a list of drugs
the patient agrees need access to them, except rarely in emer- in the local formulary.
gency and for the public good (for example, to contain
epidemics, allow important research to be undertaken, or
solve serious crime). In addition, other regulatory and institu- eHealth
tional approval may be needed (for example, the need to seek The use of internet technology by the public, health workers,
consent from medical ethics committees or relevant national and others to access health and lifestyle information, services
authorities). In recent years, leading public health researchers and support; it encompasses telemedicine, telecare, etc. For
have warned that legislation enacted to protect patients’ discussion on the scope and security issues of eHealth, see a
medical data in the UK, Europe, and US could potentially recent report by the National HealthKey Collaborative.16
hamper observational research and medical record linkage
studies.8 9 ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR)
In the UK, the lifelong summary of a person’s health episodes,
CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATICS assembled from summaries of individual electronic patient
The use of medical informatics methods to facilitate the study records and other relevant data.17
and development of paper or electronic systems that support
public access to and use of health and lifestyle information. ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD (EPR)
For additional discussion on the scope of consumer health A computer based clinical data system designed to replace paper
informatics, see Eysenbach.10 See also eHealth. patient records.
www.jech.com
Downloaded from jech.bmj.com on 21 November 2006
www.jech.com
Downloaded from jech.bmj.com on 21 November 2006
REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS
REFERENCES
The process of understanding and capturing user needs, skills, 1 Shortliffe EH, Blois MS. The computer meets medicine and biology:
and wishes before developing an information system (adapted emergence of a discipline. In: Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, Wiederhold G,
from Somerville34). See also software engineering. et al, eds. Medical Informatics—computer applications in health care and
biomedicine. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001:3–40.
2 Masys DR, Brennan PF, Ozbolt JG, et al. Are medical informatics and
SECURITY nursing informatics distinct disciplines? The 1999 ACMI debate. J Am
The technical methods by which confidentiality is achieved.16 Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:304–12.
3 Shortliffe EH, Garber AM. Training synergies between medical
informatics and health services research. J Am Med Inform Assoc
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 2002;9:133–9.
4 Wyatt JC. Clinical data systems I: data and medical records. Lancet
The process of system development, documentation, imple- 1994;344:1543–7.
mentation, and upgrading (adapted from Somerville34). In the 5 Liu JLY, Wyatt JC, Altman DG. Exploring the definition and scope of
classic or “waterfall” model of software engineering, require- clinical decision tools: focus on the problem, not the solution. Oxford:
ments analysis leads to a document that serves as the basis for a Working paper, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford University,
2002.
system specification and database schema, from which 6 Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, Wiederhold G, et al. Glossary. In: Medical
programmers work to develop the software. However, increas- informatics—computer applications in health care and biomedicine. New
ingly, users and software designers work together from the York: Springer-Verlag, 2001:749–820.
7 Van Bemmel JH, Musen M. Glossary. In: A handbook of medical
start to develop and refine a prototype system. This helps to informatics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1997:557–603.
engage the users, educate the software development team, 8 Lawlor DA, Stone T. Public health and data protection: an inevitable
brings the requirements documents alive, and allows users to collision or potential for a meeting of minds. Int J Epidemiol
2001;30:1221–5.
explore how their requirements might change as a result of 9 Walton of Detchant, Doll R, Asscher W, et al. Consequences for
interaction with the new software. research if use of anonymised patient data breaches confidentiality. BMJ
1999;319:1366.
10 Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ 2000;320:1713–16.
SUBJECTIVISTIC EVALUATION 11 Wyatt JC, Spiegelhalter D. Field trials of medical decision aids: potential
An evaluation approach that relies primarily on qualitative problems and solutions. Proc 15th Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care
data derived from observation, interview, and analysis of 1991;3–7.
12 Hingorani AD, Vallance P. A simple computer programme for guiding
documents and other artefacts.6 15 The focus of such studies is management of cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing. BMJ
on description and explanation; they tend to evolve rather 1999;318:101–5.
www.jech.com
Downloaded from jech.bmj.com on 21 November 2006
13 Adams ID, Chan M, Clifford PC, et al. Computer aided diagnosis of 26 Wyatt JC. Practice guidelines and other support for clinical innovation. J
acute abdominal pain: a multicentre study. BMJ 1986;318:101–5. R Soc Med 2000;93:299–304.
14 Sim I, Gorman P, Robert A, et al. Clinical decision support systems for 27 Wyatt JC. Clinical knowledge and practice in the information age: a
the practice of Evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc handbook for health professionals. London: Royal Society of Medicine
2001;8:527–34. Press, 2001.
15 Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Evaluation methods in medical informatics. 28 Greens RA, Shortliffe EH. Medical informatics: an emerging academic
New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997. discipline and institutional priority. JAMA 1990;263:1114–20.
16 National HealthKey Collaborative. Securing the exchange and use of 29 Yasnoff WA, O’Carroll PW, Koo D, et al. Public health informatics:
electronic health information to improve the nation’s health: a summary improving and transforming public health in the information age. J Public
report to the community. New York: The Robert Wood Johnson Health Manag Pract 2000;6:67–75.
Foundation, 2001. 30 Yasnoff WA, Overhage JM, Humphreys BL, et al. A national agenda for
17 Burns F. Information for health. Leeds: NHS Executive, 1998. public health informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:535–45.
18 Wyatt JC. Knowledge for clinicians 10: management of explicit and tacit 31 Law M, Tang JL. An analysis of the effectiveness of interventions intended
knowledge. J R Soc Med 2001;94:6–9.
to help people stop smoking. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1933–41.
19 Chen J, Campbell TC, Li J, et al. Diet, lifestyle and mortality in China.
32 Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, et al. A computerized reminder
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N
20 Kohli S, Brage HN, Lofman O. Childhood leukaemia in areas with
Engl J Med 2001;345:965–70.
different radon levels: a spatial and temporal analysis using GIS. J
Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:822–6. 33 Monkman D. Treating dyslipidaemia in primary care: the gap between
21 Lloyd OL. Respiratory-cancer clustering associated with localised policy and reality is large in the UK. BMJ 2000;321:1299–300.
industrial air pollution. Lancet 1978;i:318–20. 34 Somerville I. Software engineering. 5th edn. Wokingham:
22 Wong TW, Wong SL, Yu TS, et al. Socio-economic correlates of infant Addison-Wesley, 1995.
mortality in Hong Kong using ecologic data 1979–1993. Scand J Soc 35 Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, Wiederhold G, et al, eds.. Medical
Med 1998;26:281–8. informatics—computer applications in health care and biomedicine. New
23 Richards TB, Croner CM, Rushton G, et al. Geographic information York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
systems and public health: mapping the future. Public Health Rep 36 Coiera E. A guide to medical informatics, the internet and telemedicine.
1999;114:359–73. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997.
24 Wyatt JC. Medical informatics: artefacts or science? Methods Inf Med 37 Bergus GR, Cantor SB, Ebell MH, et al. A glossary of medical decision
1996;35:197–200. making terms. Med Decis Making 1995;22:385–93.
25 Sless D. What is information design? In: Designing information for 38 Coiera E. Glossary. In: A guide to medical informatics, the internet and
people. Sydney: Communications Research Press, 1994:1–16. telemedicine. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997:339–50.
25a Wyatt JC, Wright P. Medical records. I: design should help use of 39 Hammond E. Glossary for healthcare standards. http://
patient data. Lancet 1998;352:1375–8. dmi-www.mc.duke.edu/dukemi/acronyms.htm, 1995.
www.jech.com