This document summarizes Theo van Doesburg and the De Stijl movement. It describes that De Stijl was founded in 1917 in Holland and was dedicated to synthesizing art, design, and architecture. Van Doesburg was the leader and included members like Piet Mondrian, Gerrit Rietveld, and others. It also describes Van Doesburg's role in publishing magazines under pseudonyms to promote Constructivism and Dadaism.
This document summarizes Theo van Doesburg and the De Stijl movement. It describes that De Stijl was founded in 1917 in Holland and was dedicated to synthesizing art, design, and architecture. Van Doesburg was the leader and included members like Piet Mondrian, Gerrit Rietveld, and others. It also describes Van Doesburg's role in publishing magazines under pseudonyms to promote Constructivism and Dadaism.
This document summarizes Theo van Doesburg and the De Stijl movement. It describes that De Stijl was founded in 1917 in Holland and was dedicated to synthesizing art, design, and architecture. Van Doesburg was the leader and included members like Piet Mondrian, Gerrit Rietveld, and others. It also describes Van Doesburg's role in publishing magazines under pseudonyms to promote Constructivism and Dadaism.
This document summarizes Theo van Doesburg and the De Stijl movement. It describes that De Stijl was founded in 1917 in Holland and was dedicated to synthesizing art, design, and architecture. Van Doesburg was the leader and included members like Piet Mondrian, Gerrit Rietveld, and others. It also describes Van Doesburg's role in publishing magazines under pseudonyms to promote Constructivism and Dadaism.
Composed in 1918; rst published in De Stijl 5 (1922) in
Amsterdam. The De Stijl group was founded in Holland in 1917, dedicated to a synthesis of art, design and architecture. Van Doesburg was its leader and ambassador-at-large. Its members included Gerrit Rietveld, designer of the Red and Blue Chair; J. J. P. Oud, the Municipal Architect for Rotterdam; Piet Mondrian, the great painter of the grid, issuing in a cool Broadway Boogie Woogie (1942–3); Georges Vantongerloo, Bart van der Leck and Vilmos Huszár. Van Doesburg’s relationship with Mondrian, his inspiration, proved easier at one remove; their temperaments clashed, and possibly their geometrical principles. Legend has it that Mondrian never accepted the diagonal, whereas van Doesburg insisted on its dynamic properties – and so they parted, to be reconciled several years later, after a chance meeting in a Paris café.
THEO VAN DOESBURG (Christian Emil Marie Küpper, 1883–1931)
was a man of multiple aliases and manifold accomplishments. He took the name of his stepfather, Theo(dorus) Doesburg, and added the ‘van’. He painted, promoted De Stijl, and designed all manner of things: homes for artists, decoration for the Café Aubette in Strasbourg, and a geometrically constructed alphabet, revived in digital form as Architype Van Doesburg. He was simultaneously a Constructivist and a Dadaist, publishing Mécano (in Leiden), an ‘ultra-individualistic, irregular international review for the di usion of neo-Dada ideas and mental hygiene’, under the heteronym I. K. Bonset (possibly an anagram of Ik ben zot, ‘I am foolish’). Mécano advertised Bonset as its literary editor and Van Doesburg as its ‘visual arts technician’ (mécanicien plastique). The latter was already well known as the editor of De Stijl; the fact that they were one and the same surprised even the unsurprisable avant-garde. I. K. Bonset was also an essayist and a derivative Dada manifestoist. (‘Dada is the complete astringent cleansing to cure you of your art-and-logic diarrhoea. Dada is the cork in the bottle of your stupidity.’) Aldo Camini, on the other hand, was a writer of severe anti-philosophical screeds, inspired by the Futurist Carlo Carrà in Metaphysical mode. In this guise, Van Doesburg (for it was he) opposed individualism and argued for a collective experience of a new reality, evoked (by sounds, noises and smells, perhaps) rather than described. His second wife, Nelly van Moorsel (1899–1975), was an accomplished pianist, whose recitals were a regular feature of the Dada Tour of Holland (1923) led by Van Doesburg and Kurt Schwitters (1887–1948). See also ‘Manifesto Prole Art’ (M46).
***
1. There is an old and a new consciousness of time.
The old is connected with the individual. The new is connected with the universal. The struggle of the individual against the universal is revealing itself in the world war as well as in the art of the present day. 2. The war is destroying the old world and its contents: individual domination in every state. 3. The new art has brought forward what the new consciousness of time contains: a balance between the universal and the individual. 4. The new consciousness is prepared to realize the internal life as well as the external life. 5. Traditions, dogmas and the domination of the individual are opposed to this realization. 6. The founders of the new plastic art, therefore, call upon all who believe in the reformation of art and culture to eradicate these obstacles to development, as in the new plastic art (by excluding natural form) they have eradicated that which blocks pure artistic expression, the ultimate consequence of all concepts of art. 7. The artists of today have been driven the whole world over by the same consciousness, and therefore have taken part from an intellectual point of view in this war against the domination of individual despotism. They therefore sympathize with all who work to establish international unity in life, art, culture, either intellectually or materially.