Inf and PF 2018 Part 5 (Recovered 1) (Recovered)
Inf and PF 2018 Part 5 (Recovered 1) (Recovered)
Inf and PF 2018 Part 5 (Recovered 1) (Recovered)
Finance
Price formation in power markets
The Main Risks Assumed in Markets
• Price risk
• Quantity risk
• Fuel price risk
• Availability risk
2
Electricity System
Technical specifics of electricity
• “No storage”
Market has to clear fully at all times
• Electricity takes the path of least resistance
Electrons do not respond to prices
• Electricity “travels at light speed”
Market needs to clear instantaneously
• Interactions in transmission
– Actions by any generator or customer affect others (e.g.
congestion)
– Need for “ancillary services (incl. fast response, reactive
power) that support the existence of the market (system
stability)
4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTM2Ck6XWHg
Functional Requirements
• Eliminating imbalances (supply and demand)
• Elicit Investment
6
Key elements of any power market
• Forward markets
• Balancing markets
• Dispatch
7
Forward Market
in case of overloading, demand and supplies doesnt match, suppliers will ask buyer to auction their booking
Balancing market
Dispatch
Vertically integrated monopoly
generation wholesaling
Competitive market includes: generation and wholesale
high voltage
transmission System operation
monopolistic market includes transmission, distribution
and system operation
Low voltage
distribution retailing
competitive
kwh $
customer 11
Retail competition
wholesale
12
MO: Market operator; SA: Settlement administrator; ISO: Independent System Operator
Merit Order Dispatch
marginal cost of each power plants
Source: W. Hogan (2004)
generators are bidding their price which relates to the capacity they can provide.
generators will try to bid a price close to system price. if its too high they wont get dispatched
because there will be someone cheaper, and if they bid cheaper you're bidding at loss thus it
gives incentive for the bidder to near the system price
Price formation
– Capacity withholding
Exercise of Market Power
Price $/kwh
A 6
5
4
3
2
1
Quantity (MW) 23
Withholding Capacity
• Necessary repairs…
29
Disaster strikes
AVERAGE PRICES THAT UTILITIES PAID FOR
ELECTRICITY IN THE CALIFORNIA POWER
EXCHANGE'S DAY‐AHEAD AUCTIONS, APRIL
1998 THROUGH DECEMBER 2000
(In)elastic Demand
Price $/kwh
4 5
3
1 2
Quantity (MW) 31
California
Quantity (MW) 43
(In)elastic Demand
Price $/kwh
VOLL
4 5
3
1 2
Quantity (MW) 44
Implications of Inelastic Demand
• At times demand and supply curves may not
intersect
• At those times rationing (“load shedding”) is
needed to match demand and supply
• By the same token, no “equilibrium” price
emerges from the interplay of demand‐ and
supply‐side bidding – “price is infinite”
• System operators need to set a price that is
paid to generators at those times
Setting the price during times of
rationing (load shedding)
• Using opportunity cost (“value of lost load” –
VOLL) or willingness to pay
• VOLL estimates
– $1000 – 50,000 (high margin of uncertainty)
gas turbines has lower cost under low hours of operation. and at the crossover point with fossil
fuel switch usage
Investment Incentives
• Simple example with two types of plants:
Technology FC/MWh VC/MWh
Peaker $6 $30
Baseload $12 $18
– 6 + Cf * 30 = 12 + Cf * 18
6+0.5*30= 21 <-- long run marginal cost
– Cf * 12 = 6 and Cf = 0.5
• Up to a capacity factor of 0.5 the peaking plant
should run, the rest should be supplied by the
base load plant
• Hence baseload plants needs to have capacity of
6000 MW (4000 used at all times plus 2000 half
of the time)
The Peaking Plant
• Chile introduces
competition in generation
in 1982
• The rest of the world does
not notice
The basic market design in Chile
(formerly also Argentina)
• Generators submit marginal cost semi‐
annually
• System operator may audit the cost data
• Merit order dispatch on the basis of marginal
costs
• Capacity payments to cover investment costs
Are ancillary services public goods?
• Who has incentive to pay for system operation,
market operation and central trade enforcement
services etc.?