71737-Ela 20 2012
71737-Ela 20 2012
71737-Ela 20 2012
Saskatchewan Curriculum
English
Language
Arts
20
English Language Arts 20
ISBN 978-1-77107-017-1
1. Language arts (Secondary school) - Saskatchewan - Curricula. 2. Competency-based education - Saskatchewan.
Saskatchewan. Ministry of Education.
All rights are reserved by the original copyright owners.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Core Curriculum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Broad Areas of Learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Lifelong Learners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Sense of Self, Community, and Place. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Engaged Citizens. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Cross-curricular Competencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Developing Thinking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Developing Identity and Interdependence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Developing Literacies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Developing Social Responsibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
K-12 Aim and Goals of English Language Arts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Questions Derived from the Aim and Goals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Why Study English Language Arts?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
An Effective English Language Arts Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Provides Meaningful Contexts that Address “Big Ideas” and Questions for Deeper Understanding . . . . . . . . . . 9
Focuses on Grade-specific Outcomes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
English Language Arts 20 Goals and Outcomes Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Focuses on Language. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Uses Critical and Powerful Learning Strategies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Includes a Range of Texts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Encourages Inquiry, Social Responsibility and Personal Agency, and Self-reflection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Outcomes and Indicators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Assessment and Evaluation of Student Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Connections with Other Areas of Study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Glossary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Feedback Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Heather Meek
Department of English
University of Regina
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Ministry of Education also wishes to thank many others who contributed to the development of this
curriculum:
• First Nations teachers
• University faculty members
• other educators and reviewers.
This curriculum is based on the Western and Northern Canadian Protocol (WNCP) The Common Curriculum
Framework for English Language Arts (Kindergarten to Grade 12) (1998).
Lifelong Learners
Related to the following Goals of Students who are engaged in constructing and applying English
Education: language arts knowledge naturally build a positive disposition towards
• Basic Skills learning. Throughout their study of English language arts, students
• Lifelong Learning gain understandings, skills, and strategies to become more competent
• Positive Lifestyle and confident language users.
Engaged Citizens
Related to the following Goals of In the English language arts, students learn how language enables
Education: them to make a difference in their personal, family, and community
lives. Language gives them a sense of agency and an ability to make a
• Career and Consumer Decisions
• Membership in Society
difference in their community and the world in which they live.
• Growing with Change
Developing Thinking
Learners construct knowledge to make sense of the world around K-12 Goals for Developing Thinking:
them. They develop understanding by building on what is already
• thinking and learning
known. This key competency concerns the ability to make sense of
contextually
information, experiences, and ideas through thinking contextually, • thinking and learning creatively
critically, and creatively. The philosophy of learning in English language • thinking and learning critically
arts is inquiry-based, and students use their language and thinking
skills to explore a range of topics, issues, and themes.
Developing Literacies
Literacies provide many ways, including the use of various language K-12 Goals for Developing Literacies:
systems and media, to interpret the world and express understanding • constructing knowledge related
of it. Literacies involve the evolution of interrelated skills, strategies, to various literacies
and understandings that facilitate an individual’s ability to participate • exploring and interpreting the
fully and equitably in a variety of roles and contexts – school, home, world through various literacies
and local and global communities. To achieve this competency • expressing understanding and
requires developing skills, strategies, and understandings related communicating meaning using
to various literacies in order to explore and interpret the world and various literacies
communicate meaning. English language arts requires students to
use different literacies, including language literacy, effectively and
contextually to represent ideas and understanding in multiple, flexible
ways.
Social Sciences
Physical Health
Education Identity and
Education
Thinking
Interdependence
Comprehend
and Respond Sense of Self,
Community, and Place
Assess and
Reflect
Social Literacies
Responsibility
Mathematics Science
The K-12 goals are broad statements identifying what students are
expected to know, understand, and be able to do upon completion
of study in a particular subject (e.g., English language arts). The K-12
goals of the Saskatchewan English language arts curricula are to:
Comprehend and Respond (CR). Students will extend their abilities
to view, listen to, read, comprehend, and respond to a variety of
contemporary and traditional grade-appropriate texts in a variety of
forms (oral, print, and other texts) from First Nations, Métis, and other
cultures for a variety of purposes including for learning, interest, and
enjoyment.
Using assessment and evaluation to guide and improve Avoiding accountability for own learning
learning, and provide opportunities to reflect, monitor, self-
assess, and set targets for learning
Demonstrating learning in many ways Not reflecting on or analyzing own progress
Reflecting on own learning and literacy Assuming that the responsibility for learning and literacy
lies with the teacher
Developing the disposition to lifelong learning Setting short-term goals for learning (e.g., “Is it on the test?”)
Using contemporary technologies to learn and to Using limited or inappropriate technology for technology’s
document understanding sake
Through a “deep” understanding of this curriculum (Fullan, Hill, & Crévola, 2006) and knowing when to use
effective instructional, assessment, and classroom management strategies based on sound research (Marzano,
2007), English language arts teachers can help all students become competent and confident language users.
Compose and Create (CC). Students will extend their abilities to speak, write, and use other forms of
representation to explore and present thoughts, feelings, and experiences in a variety of forms for a
variety of purposes and audiences.
CC 20.1 Create a range of visual, multimedia, oral, and written texts to explore:
• identity (e.g., Relationships with Family and Others);
• social responsibility (e.g., Evolving Roles and Responsibilities); and
• social action (agency) (e.g., The Past and the Present).
CC 20.2 Create visual or multimedia presentations using dramatization or role play, including a presentation of
an interview of a literary character (or author or historical or contemporary person) from a First Nations, Métis,
Saskatchewan, Canadian, or international text.
CC 20.3 Speak to present ideas and information appropriately in informal (including discussions and
collaborative work) and formal (including an interview, a dramatic reading, and introducing and thanking a
speaker) situations.
CC 20.4 Create a variety of written informational (including an essay of explanation of a process, an application
letter and résumé, and an argumentative or persuasive essay) and literary (including a reflective or personal essay
and an analysis of a literary text) communications.
Assess and Reflect (AR). Students will extend their abilities to assess and reflect on their own language
skills; discuss the skills of effective viewers, listeners, readers, representers, speakers, and writers; and set
goals for future improvement.
AR 20.1 Assess own ability to view, listen, read, speak, write, and use other forms of representing effectively.
AR 20.2 Establish goals and plans for personal language learning based on self-assessment of achievements,
needs, and interests.
Essay of argument/
persuasion
Literary Historical persona Fictionalized Essay of reflection Real or invented Short story or
Writing essay journal entries (personal essay) narrative essay using
parody, satire,
A review Short script Analysis of a literary Literary criticism and/or irony
text essay
Critique of an
author’s style
Other Forms of Visual or multimedia Visual or Visual or Visual or Visual or
Representing presentation multimedia multimedia multimedia multimedia
explaining key ideas presentation presentation presentation on presentation
and events (actual supporting of an interview a contemporary persuading
or based on text researched talk with a literary Canadian audience to act
studied) through using either character using landscape using a on an issue using
an appropriate digital or other dramatization or photo essay presentation
combination of presentation tools role play techniques most
charts, diagrams, appropriate to
pictures, sounds, audience and
models, drama, and purpose
print
Experimenting Memorandum Letter of Articles Minutes of Proposal
complaint meeting
Legend Radio Script
Obituary dramatization or Chapter of novel
documentary
Poetry Letter to an
Brochure Short story authority (e.g.,
Blog post or web MP, MLA, Chief,
content Mayor) advocating
change
The “during” phase of viewing, listening, and reading cannot be treated as simply “assign and evaluate.” Students should not
be told simply to view, listen, or read, and then asked questions in the “after” phase to determine if they have comprehended
a text. In the “during” phase, most students need the strategies to be modelled explicitly and taught explicitly.
View Again, Listen, Read, I could deepen my understanding and pleasure by reviewing, listening again, and/or
Represent, Speak, and Write re-reading …
to Deepen Understanding and I could share my thoughts and insights with others by:
Pleasure
• representing (e.g., creating a tableau, a graphic organizer, a storyboard)
• speaking (e.g., discussing, giving a dramatic reading, role playing)
• writing (e.g., a script, a narrative, a poem).
Viewing:
Think Alouds (Davey, 1983)
View, Pause, Predict, and Think Aloud
Collaborative Viewing Guide (Wood, 1994)
Directed Viewing-Thinking Activity (DVTA)
Picture Walk (Richards & Anderson, 2003)
Viewing Guides
Listening:
TQLR (Tune In, Questions, Listen, and Review) (SRA, 2000)
ACTION (Attention, Concentrate, Think, Interpret, Organize, and Note) (Sebranek & Kemper, 1995)
Listen-Think-Pair-Share (McTighe & Lyman, 1992)
Listen-Draw-Pair-Share (McConnell, 1992)
DLTA (Directed Listening-Thinking Activity) (Stauffer, 1975)
LAPS (Listen, Ask, Picture, and Summarize) Strategy (Matchullis & Mueller, 1996)
Listening Guides
Reading:
Anticipation/Reaction Guide (Herber, 1978; Readance, Bean, & Baldwin, 1989)
KWL, K-W-L Plus (Carr & Ogle, 1987)
Preview/Connect/Predict (Robb, 2006)
List/Group/Categorize (Robb, 2006)
SMART (Self-monitoring Approach to Reading and Thinking) (Vaughan & Estes, 1986)
Read SMART (Buehl, 2001)
B-D-A (Before, During, and After) Strategy (Laverick, 2002)
Directed Reading-Thinking Activity (DRTA) (Stauffer, 1975)
Reciprocal Reading (Palincsar & Brown, 1986)
ReQuest (Manzo, 1969; Vacca & Vacca, 1999)
Easy as 1, 2, 3 (Moore in Olson, 2003)
QtA (Question the Author) (Beck, McKeown, Hamilton, & Kucan, 1997)
QARs (Question Answer Relationship) (Raphael, 1986)
GIST (Generating Interactions between Schemata and Texts) (Cunningham, 1982)
Mapping It Out (Hoyt, 2000)
Double Journal Entries
Justifying My Opinions (Hoyt, 2000)
Open-mind Portraits (Tompkins, 2004)
Coding the Text (Harvey & Goudvis, 2000)
Think Alouds (Davey, 1983)
REAP (Read, Encode, Annotate, and Ponder) (Eanet & Manzo, 1976)
Reading Guides
SQ3R (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review) (Robinson, 1961)
SEARCH (Scan, Examine, Act, Review, Connect, and Hunt)
Discussion Circles
Grand Conversations (Eeds & Wells, 1989)
Literature Circles (Daniels, 1994)
Reader’s Workshop
Pragmatic Cues (audience, For whom am I communicating this and for what purpose?
purpose, situation) What register and tone is appropriate?
Textual Cues (genre and form) What form should this take?
How should I arrange my ideas and sequence and connect them?
Are all new paragraphs clearly identified?
Syntactic Cues (sentence) Are my sentences clear? Complete? Interesting? Varied? Correct?
Semantic/Lexical Cues (word) Did I choose the right words? Did I use the words correctly?
Other Cues
How can I make this more interesting? More effective? More vivid?
Are my accompanying visuals or multimedia choices appropriate?
Did I use legible handwriting or appropriate fonts, formatting, or props?
Experiment with How well do the communication variables (e.g., content, organization, purpose,
Communication Features and audience, context) work together?
Techniques How can I use different features to communicate my ideas more clearly and more
effectively?
Revise for Sentence Structure Are the sentences clear and complete?
and Flow Do the sentences read smoothly?
Is the sentence structure varied?
Do the subjects and verbs agree?
Revise for Word Choice, Does the language fit the audience and purpose?
Spelling, and Usage Have I used the best words?
Have I used any words too many times?
Have I left out any words?
Are the words spelled correctly?
Proofread and Review for Did I proofread for capitalization and punctuation?
Mechanics and Appearance Is it audible?
(Punctuation and
Is the polished draft legible?
Capitalization)
Is the layout clear?
Confer with Peers, Teacher, or What is the part that I like best?
Others Does it say what I wanted it to say?
Does it have a clear form?
Does it make sense? Is it interesting?
Does it produce the intended reaction?
Is it clear and easy to understand? Is it appropriate for my purpose and audience?
How can it be improved?
What could I do next?
Polish, Practise, and Decide What do quality representing, speaking, and writing look and sound like?
How the Work will be Shared Is the presentation ready?
and/or Published
In what context (situation) will the viewers, listeners, or readers engage with the text?
How will this context affect its presentation?
Share Final Product, Reflect What is the viewers’, listeners’, or readers’ response?
and Consider Feedback, and What worked well?
Celebrate Learning
What would I try next time?
What lessons have I learned from this experience?
How do I find opportunities to celebrate my achievements?
Speaking:
Talking Circle
Think, Pair, Share/Square (McTighe & Lyman, 1992)
Instructional Conversations (Goldenberg, 1993)
TAPS (Total Group, Alone, Partner, and Small Group) (Gregory & Chapman, 2002)
Grouptalk (Whipple, 1975; Moffett & Wagner, 1992)
Writing:
Discuss/Brainstorm/Web
Think-Pair-Share-Write (Robb, 2006)
Asking the 5Ws and H (who, what, where, when, why, and how)
Writing Frames
RAFTS (Adler & Vendeventer, 1989)
Fast Writes (Robb, 2006)
Authors’ Circle (Graves & Hansen, 1983)
Passes (Perrin, 1992)
Guided, Layered Revision (Forney, 1999)
Writing Workshop (Calkins, 1994)
Informational Television news stories and programs (e.g., documentaries, nature shows, special interest
Texts shows), advertising, websites, photographs, graphics, charts, tables, flowcharts, logos,
displays, illustrations, posters, advertisements, magazines, newspapers, TV programs, games,
labels, signs, posters, billboards, maps, collages, simulations
Informational Magazines or newspaper articles, reports, reviews, websites, e-zines, text messages, blogs,
Texts social networking sites, emails, letters, memos, charts, tables, labels, instructions, directories,
manuals, guidebooks, timetables, recipes, promotional leaflets, brochures, catalogues, CVs/
résumés, proposals, position papers, research papers, editorials, surveys, newsletters, press
releases, agendas, users’ manuals, summaries, letters (business, application, friendly), reviews
(film, video game, website)
Course Texts
Literary Texts
Short Essays Poems Plays Full- Novel Other Oral
Stories length Media Texts
Non-
fiction
3 (TGS) 3 (TGS) 5 (TGS) 1 (TGS) 1 (TGS) 1 (TGS)
2 (IS) 2 (IS) 5 (IS) 1 (IS) 1 (IS) 1 (IS)
ELA 20 Informational Texts
Posters Magazine Podcasts Public Service Documentaries Other Oral
Brochures and Websites Announcements Television and Media Texts
Newspaper Social Radio News Advertising
Articles Commentary Broadcasts Blogs
Interpret
Collaborate Conclude
Analyze
Plan Investigate
Reflect and Reflect and
Revise How are we going to proceed? Revise
Explore Create
Observe Synthesize
Acknowledge Sources Document Processes Resources
Comprehend and Respond (CR). Students will extend their abilities to view, listen to, read, comprehend,
and respond to a variety of contemporary and traditional grade-appropriate texts in a variety of forms
(oral, print, and other media) from First Nations, Métis, and other cultures for a variety of purposes
including for learning, interest, and enjoyment.
Outcomes Indicators
CR 20.1 View, listen to, read, a. Examine topics and contemporary and traditional visual, oral,
comprehend, and respond to written, multimedia, and digital (including social media) First
a variety of grade-appropriate Nations, Métis, Saskatchewan, Canadian, and international texts
First Nations, Métis, that present different viewpoints and perspectives on issues
Saskatchewan, Canadian, related to identity, social responsibility, and social action (agency).
and international texts that b. View, listen to, and read First Nations, Métis, Saskatchewan,
address: Canadian, and international texts that reflect diverse personal
• identity (e.g., Relationships identities, world views, traditions, and backgrounds (e.g.,
with Family and Others); appearance, culture, socio-economic status, ability, age, gender,
• social responsibility language).
(e.g., Evolving Roles and c. Connect ideas, observations, opinions, and emotions to
Responsibilities); and understand texts.
• social action (agency)(e.g.,
d. Analyze, compare, and evaluate interpretations and viewpoints
The Past and the Present).
when responding to First Nations and Métis texts and themes.
e. Make connections between personal experiences and prior
knowledge of traditions, genres, and a variety of texts.
f. Respond personally and critically to themes, values, and beliefs
presented in a variety of First Nations and Métis texts.
g. Identify ways that society and culture shape the content, forms,
and language of texts, including digital texts.
h. Explain ways that languages and texts reveal and shape
understanding of human diversity.
Outcomes Indicators
CR 20.3 Listen to, comprehend, a. Listen to and interpret a variety of grade-appropriate literary and
and develop coherent and informational texts created by First Nations, Métis, Saskatchewan,
plausible interpretations Canadian, and international authors from various cultural
of grade-appropriate communities that address identity, social responsibility, and social
informational and literary action (agency).
First Nations, Métis, b. Select, use, and evaluate critically a variety of before (page 19),
Saskatchewan, Canadian, and during (page 20), and after (page 21) strategies to construct
international texts, including meaning when listening.
spoken instructions, and
argumentative and persuasive c. Use language cues and conventions (page 17) of a variety of
speeches. informational and literary texts to construct and confirm meaning
when listening.
d. Demonstrate the First Nations, Métis (refer to Teaching Treaties
in Classroom and/or school division Elder protocol policy), and
other cultures’ (consult multicultural organizations) protocols for
listening.
Outcomes Indicators
CC 20.1 Create a range of a. Connect ideas, observations, opinions, and emotions to respond to
visual, multimedia, oral, and and create texts.
written texts to explore: b. Create spoken, written, multimedia, and other representations that
• identity (e.g., Relationships include:
with Family and Others); • a clear thesis
• social responsibility • accurate, appropriate, and convincing details to support the
(e.g., Evolving Roles and thesis
Responsibilities); and
• a style, voice, and format that is audience and purpose
• social action (agency)(e.g.,
appropriate
The Past and the Present).
• unity, coherence, and emphasis in a logical progression and
with logical support for ideas/thesis
• effective and clear organization patterns
• a valid and justifiable conclusion.
c. Write a research essay (approximately six to ten pages) building on
primary and secondary sources that:
• marshals evidence in support of a clear thesis statement and
related claims
• paraphrases and summarizes, with accuracy and fidelity, the
range of arguments and supports or refutes the thesis
• cites sources correctly and documents quotations, paraphrase,
and other information using standard format.
d. Conduct and present an extended inquiry/research based on a
topic of the course that:
• determines inquiry or research focus and parameters based
on personal knowledge and others’ expertise
• formulates and revises questions to focus inquiry or research
the topic and purpose
• explores group knowledge and strengths to determine
inquiry or research the topic, purpose, and procedures
• develops, uses, and adapts an inquiry or research plan
appropriate for content, audience, purpose, context, sources,
and procedures
• selects ideas and information from prior knowledge of the
inquiry or research topic appropriate for audience, purpose,
and personal perspective or focus
Interviewer:
• obtain pertinent information from interviewee
• prepare questions that explore the character and his/her
conflicts
• ask relevant and open-ended questions
• reflect tactful wording.
Role-play:
• analyze situations and character from a scene, event, or story
• interview and stay in character
• bring the literary character to life.
e. Present information incorporating visual, audio-visual, and
dramatic aids to engage the intended audience and achieve the
purpose.
f. Use creative combinations of language, visuals, and sound in a
variety of texts to convey content and achieve effect.
Outcomes Indicators
CC 20.3 Speak to present ideas a. Demonstrate flexibility in assuming a variety of group roles and
and information appropriately take responsibility for tasks that achieve group goals including:
in informal (including
• sticking to topic or focus and posing relevant questions
discussions and collaborative
work) and formal (including an • supporting ideas with examples and reasons
interview, a dramatic reading, • listening to the ideas of others and thinking about what they
and introducing and thanking are saying
a speaker) situations. • extracting essential information from others’ input
• building on the ideas of others and contributing relevant
information and ideas in group discussions
• getting the floor in respectful ways including the sharing
circle
• using questioning and paraphrasing to invite all group
members into the discussion
• defining individuals’ roles and responsibilities and setting
clear goals
• acknowledging the ideas and contributions of individuals in
the group
• understanding the purpose of the team project and ground
rules for decision making
• maintaining independence of judgment and offering dissent
courteously
• selecting a leader/spokesperson when necessary
• interacting purposefully, confidentially, and ethically in a
variety of situations
• evaluating and adjusting own roles to align with the group’s
purpose.
Outcomes Indicators
CC 20.4 Create a variety a. Create a variety of written communications using various elements
of written informational of discourse (e.g., purpose, speaker, audience, form), in narrative,
(including an essay of expository, persuasive, information, and/or descriptive texts that:
explanation of a process, • address audience needs, the stated purpose, and context
an application letter and
• provide an engaging introduction
résumé, and an argumentative
or a persuasive essay) and • develop a thesis
literary (including a reflective • create an organizing structure appropriate to the purpose,
or personal essay and an audience, and context
analysis of a literary text) • include relevant information and exclude extraneous
communications. information
Letter:
• tailors letter to position or job and advertisement
• analyzes what he/she has to offer
• selects a standard letter format of one page
• uses the name and title of the person doing the hiring in the
inside address and salutation
Résumé:
• invites the recipient to read because of a clean, visually
appealing appearance
• uses a format appropriate for the position or job
• includes specific and necessary information (e.g., dates,
names, organizations, schools, special achievements, or
merits) and categories (e.g., name, address, and telephone
number; a summary of work experience, with the most recent
first; a summary of education in reverse chronological order;
other skills, training, awards, and interests; and at least three
references)
• demonstrates knowledge of the organization and company,
and targets the résumé to the specific position
• presents most relevant accomplishments, qualifications, and
strengths that help ensure he/she stands out from other
candidates.
f. Write an essay of argument/persuasion (or an editorial) that:
• states clearly a position about the current issue or problem
• supports the position with reasons, is persuasive, and offers
realistic solution
• provides support and answers/addresses any objection
• closes by restating the position, calling for action, or asking
reader to get involved
• ensures that facts are correct
• uses a persuasive voice that balances facts and feelings
• chooses inclusive and respectful language and qualifiers to
strengthen position.
Assess and Reflect (AR). Students will extend their abilities to assess and reflect on their own language
skills; discuss the skills of effective viewers, listeners, readers, representers, speakers, and writers; and set
goals for future improvement.
Outcomes Indicators
AR 20.1 Assess own ability a. Develop goals and plans for improving personal language learning
to view, listen, read, speak, and use.
write, and use other forms of
b. Explain the importance (to self and others) of new understandings,
representing effectively.
skills, and strategies.
c. Evaluate own contributions to the group process and seek support
AR 20.2 Establish goals and where needed.
plans for personal language
d. Consider alternative ways of reaching goals and implement plans
learning based on self-
to achieve personal goals.
assessment of achievements,
needs, and interests. e. Celebrate special accomplishments.
Analytic Features
Comprehends Key Ideas and Supporting Details Presented in Text (both explicit and implicit)
Identifies the Identifies the Identifies most of Identifies some Identifies a few Identifies neither
overall message, overall message, the key ideas and of the key of the explicit the explicit nor
key ideas, and key ideas, and their supporting explicit ideas and main ideas and a implicit messages
their supporting their supporting details, and can some of the key few supporting in visual,
details, and details, and identify explicit supporting details details but cannot multimedia, oral,
can explain the can explain the and some of the but has difficulty identify the and printed texts.
relationship explicit and implicit messages identifying the implicit messages
between the implicit messages in visual, implicit messages in visual,
explicit and in visual, multimedia, oral, in visual, multimedia, oral,
implicit messages multimedia, oral, and printed texts. multimedia, oral, and printed texts.
in visual, and printed texts. and printed texts.
multimedia, oral,
and printed texts.
Planning is Planning is Planning identifies Planning shows Less than adequate Evidence of
evident and the evident and the main ideas. an awareness of planning results planning is
composition or composition purpose. in inconsistent absent.
presentation seems complete. development.
comes together as
a secure whole.
The student The student The student The student The student The composition
demonstrates effectively demonstrates shows a basic shows some shows an
confident control controls the control over control over control over the uncertain
of the language language the language the language language elements grasp of the
elements of elements and elements and elements and and techniques basic language
composition and techniques. techniques. techniques. but attempts at elements relative
presentation. variety result in to the purpose.
awkwardness Sentences are
and/or obscured incomplete, run-
meaning. on, or simple in
structure.
The few errors in The few Minor errors, Some of the errors Frequent Numerous
mechanics are mechanical errors though in mechanics mechanical mechanical
likely the result of do not impede noticeable, do not may impede errors impede and structural
risk taking. communication. impede audience understanding. understanding. errors impede
understanding. understanding.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing
student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Brophy, J. & Alleman, J. (1991). A caveat: Curriculum integration isn’t always a good idea. Educational Leadership,
49, 66.
Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading
Association.
Calkins, L. M. (1994). The art of teaching writing (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Carr, E. M. & Ogle, D. (1987). K-W-L plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30,
626-631.
Cox, C. (1999). Teaching language arts: A student- and response-centered classroom. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Cunningham, J. (1982). Generating interactions between schemata and text. In J. Niles & L. Harris (Eds.). Thirty-
first yearbook of the national reading conference, 42-47. Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
Daniels, H. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centered classroom. York, ME: Stenhouse.
Davey, B. (1983). Think aloud – modeling the cognitive process of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27,
44-47.
Eanet, M. & Manzo, A. (1976). R.E.A.P. – A strategy for improving reading/writing study skills. Journal of Reading,
19, 647-652.
Education Review Office. (1996). Science in schools – Implementing the 1995 science curriculum (5). Wellington:
Crown Copyright.
Eeds, M. & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literary study groups.
Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 4-29.
Forney, M. (1999). The writing menu: Ensuring success for every student. Gainesville, FL: Maupin House Publishing.
Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crévola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Goldenberg, C. (1993). Instruction conversations: Promoting comprehension through discussion. The Reading
Teacher, 46, 316-326.
Graves, D. & Hansen, J. (1983). The author’s chair. Language Arts, 60, 176-183.
Gregory, G. H. & Chapman, C. (2002). Differentiated instructional strategies: One size doesn’t fit all. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Harste, J. C., Short, K. B., & Burke, C. L. (1988). Creating classrooms for authors: The reading-writing connection.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Herber, H. (1978). Teaching reading in content areas (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jamieson, D. G. & Tremblay, R.E. (2005). Newsletter. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Language and Literacy Research
Network.
Kuhlthau, C. C. & Todd, R. J. (2007). Guided inquiry: A framework for learning through school libraries in 21st century
schools. Retrieved January 28, 2008, from Rutgers University, Center for International Scholarship in
School Libraries website: http://cissl.scils.rutgers.edu/guided_inquiry/constructivist_learning.html.
Laverick, C. (2002). B-D-A strategy: Reinventing the wheel can be a good thing. Journal of Adolescent and Adult
Literacy, 46, 144-149.
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Matchullis, L. & Mueller, B. (1996). Success for all learners: A handbook on differentiating instruction, a resource for
kindergarten to senior 4. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Education and Training.
McConnell, S. (1992). Talking drawings: A strategy for assisting learners. Journal of Reading, 36, 260-269.
McTighe, J. & Lyman, F. T. (1992). Mind tools for matters of the mind. In A. Costa, J. Bellanca, & R. Fogarty (Eds.). If
minds matter: A foreword to the future, 2, 71-90. Palantine, IL: IRI/Skylight Pub.
Mills, H. & Donnelly, A. (2001). From the ground up: Creating a culture of inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
Educational Books, Ltd.
Moffett, J. & Wagner, B. (1992). Student-centered language arts and reading, K-12: A handbook for teachers. Boston,
MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Olson, C. B. (2003). The reading/writing connection: Strategies for teaching and learning in the secondary classroom.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading
Teacher, 39, 771-777.
Perrin, T. (1992). Unleashing your creativity: Become a better, more productive writer. In J. Barker-Sandbrook,
(ed.). Essays: Patterns and perspectives. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.
Queensland Studies Authority (2009). English learning area. Brisbane, AUS: the State of Queensland.
Raphael, T. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39, 516-522.
Readance, J., Bean T., & Baldwin, R. (1989). Content area reading: An integrated approach (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA:
Kendall/Hunt.
Richards, J. C. & Anderson, N. A. (2003). What do I see? What do I think? What do I wonder? (STW): A visual literacy
strategy to help emergent readers focus on storybook illustrations. The Reading Teacher, 56, 442-444.
Robinson, F. (1961). Effective study. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2009). Core Curriculum: Principles, time allocations, and credit policy. Regina,
SK: Government of Saskatchewan.
Saskatchewan Literacy Commission. (2004). A provincial literacy strategy for Saskatchewan. Regina, SK:
Government of Saskatchewan.
Science Research Associates. (2000). “TQLR”, SRA reading laboratory, level 3. Chicago, IL: Science Research
Associates, Inc.
Sebranek, P. & Kemper, D. (1995). Sourcebook 8000. Burlington, WI: Write Source Education Publishing House.
Stauffer, R. (1975). Directing the reading-thinking process. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Tompkins, G. E. (2004). 50 literacy strategies step by step (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Vacca, R. T. & Vacca, J. L. (1999). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. New York, NY:
Addison-Wesley Education Publishers Inc.
Vaughan, J. & Estes, T. (1986). Reading and reasoning beyond the primary grades. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Western Canadian Protocol for Collaboration in Basic Education. (1998). The common curriculum framework for
English language arts, kindergarten to grade 12. Winnipeg, MB: The Crown in right of Governments of
Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan, and Yukon Territory.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development.
Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design: Mission, action, and achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association
for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wood, K. D. (1994). Practical strategies for improving instruction. Columbus, OH: National Middle School
Association.
other ___________________________________________________
online
online
3. Please respond to each of the following statements by circling the applicable number.
most useful:
least useful:
6. Optional:
Name: ______________________________________
School: ______________________________________
Email: ______________________________________
Thank you for taking the time to provide this valuable feedback.
Executive Director
Student Achievement and Supports Branch
Ministry of Education
2220 College Avenue
REGINA SK S4P 4V9
Fax: 306-787-2223