Article Media To Upload1649060347

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Potential Research Topic:

Interaction of Bus and Metro in Bengaluru on routes where both services overlap (partially or
significantly) along phase 1 or 2 metro routes, especially impacts on ridership of both public
transport systems.

Research stream (suggestive): transit ridership analysis, Multi-modal integration, route


rationalization, transit service design etc.

Research Brief:

Public transport forms the backbone for mobility in metropolitan cities like Bengaluru. The
Comprehensive Mobility Plan (2019) for Bengaluru targets to increase the mode share in
Bengaluru from 42% (existing) to 70% by 2035. As such several initiatives are being taken up to
increase capacity of public transport like extension of metro network, introduction of suburban rail,
retrofitting Bus Priority Lanes on roads with high frequency of bus operations etc.

However, when planning public transport systems like metro, there is a perception among some
that existing public transport systems like buses operated by BMTC should not be run on routes
where metro is operated as these two systems may compete for ridership with each other. They
opine that buses should be acting only as a feeder to metro systems. As such ridership estimates
while preparing metro project reports do not take into consideration all the potential scenarios of
interaction of metro and buses.

On the other hand, there is different view by others that both the systems, metro and buses,
should co-exist (even if they are operated on significantly overlapping routes) as they may cater
to different types of public transport users (different income classes, etc.). Also, they opine that
while significant part of trip may have overlap between buses and metro, the buses may give
direct connectivity to origin and destination to commuters, without need for transfers, making bus
travel more preferred. Since the demand for travel along some corridors might be high, they argue
that the competition in such corridors is between public transport system vs. private motorized
modes of travel rather than competition between metro and buses.

Such debates have perplexed decision makers regarding rationalizing bus services in areas
where metro is planned/commissioned.

The research should throw light on the issue mentioned above through analysis of data collected
along phase 1 or 2 metro routes and current bus routes. The data to be analyzed includes
ridership data of metro and bus routes, and survey data of metro users, bus users, and non-users.
These data should be utilized to develop a tool to evaluate the ridership impacts of interactions
between metro routes and bus network. Such a tool should be useful in the following ways:

1. Evaluate the (bus and metro) ridership impact of different metro-bus route structure
configurations – considering the extent of complementarity and competition between the
two modes as well as with the other modes.
2. Such an evaluation should guide the structuring of bus route network vis-à-vis the metro
routes for enhancing ridership for both systems (and to attract a wide range of travelers to
the public transit system).

The survey data may be utilized to examine the following aspects of metro and bus users and
non-users: (1) income/demographics (2) persona (3) trip characteristics (trip length, trip
purpose, number of transfers, etc.) and influence of these aspects on their choice of mode
(metro or bus). Such an analysis can provide insights into the following:

1. Is there a significant difference in the commuter characteristics between metro users and
bus users? When do they choose metro vs. bus?
2. What are the characteristics of commuters not currently using metro or bus? How are they
different from the users? How can they be attracted to the public transit modes?

You might also like