Minimum Design Standard Revision 3
Minimum Design Standard Revision 3
Minimum Design Standard Revision 3
TRANSMISSION DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR
COMPETITIVE
UPGRADES
REVISION 3
10/12/2021
3.0
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
REVISION HISTORY
DATE OR AUTHOR CHANGE DESCRIPTION COMMENTS
VERSION
NUMBER
1/23/2015, MDSTF Changed the 230 kV rating in the Changed per MOPC request
Revision 1 transmission circuit design to 1,200 amps and approved by MDSTF
minimum in table on page 8
12/6/2016, MDSTF Webex meeting changes as per RCWG Final version for PCWG and
Revision 2 review. MOCP approval
CONTENTS
REVISION HISTORY.......................................................................................................................................................... I
ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................1
1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................................3
2 TRANSMISSION LINES...............................................................................................................................................5
3 TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS .............................................................................................................................9
4 TRANSMISSION PROTECTION AND CONTROL DESIGN........................................................................... 16
Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 APPLICABILITY
A Request for Proposal (“RFP”) will be published for each Competitive Upgrade approved for
construction by the SPP Board of Directors after January 1, 2015. Competitive Upgrades are
subject to the Transmission Owner Selection Process (“TOSP”) set forth in Section III of
Attachment Y of the SPP Open Access Transmission Tariff (“SPP Tariff”) and associated SPP
Business Practices.
SPP will issue an RFP for a Competitive Upgrade to solicit proposals from Qualified RFP
Participants or QRPs, as defined in Attachment Y of the SPP Tariff, (“Respondent”). These SPP
Minimum Transmission Design Standards (“MTDS”) outline the minimum design standards to be
used by the Respondent in its response to such RFP issued by SPP pursuant to the TOSP for
Competitive Upgrades. If there is a conflict between the RFP and MTDS, the RFP will govern
what the Respondent will use in its RFP Response. If there is a conflict between the RFP and the
SPP Tariff or Business Practices, the SPP Tariff and Business Practices will govern.
The MTDS represent the minimum design standards by which a Competitive Upgrade shall be
designed by the successful Respondent unless the project approved by the BOD and set forth in
the RFP specifies different values than those provided in the MTDS. The MTDS facilitates the
design of transmission facilities in a manner that is compliant with NERC requirements and SPP
Criteria; are consistent with Good Utility Practice as defined in the SPP Tariff1; and are consistent
with current industry standards specified herein, such as NESC, IEEE, ASCE, CIGRE, and ANSI, at
the time the RFP is issued.
Individual sections within this document contain minimum design standards for transmission
lines and transmission substations. If the Respondent has questions regarding the MTDS or the
RFP design requirements, it is the Respondent’s sole responsibility to direct such questions to
the SPP in the manner specified by SPP in the RFP. SPP bears no responsibility if the Respondent
does not understand the MTDS or RFP design requirements. The Respondent is encouraged to
clarify such questions prior to the RFP Response due date allowing time for SPP to address such
questions.
1
The SPP Tariff defines Good Utility Practice as follows: “Good Utility Practice: Any of the practices, methods and acts
engaged in or approved by a significant portion of the electric utility industry during the relevant time period, or any
of the practices, methods and acts which, in the exercise of reasonable judgment in light of the facts known at the
time the decision was made, could have been expected to accomplish the desired result at a reasonable cost
consistent with good business practices, reliability, safety and expedition. Good Utility Practice is not intended to be
limited to the optimum practice, method, or act to the exclusion of all others, but rather to be acceptable practices,
methods, or acts generally accepted in the region, including th ose practices required by Federal Power Act section
215(a)(4).”
Respondents shall provide sufficient information supporting their design to the Industry Expert
Panel so that it can be used in the evaluation of the RFP Response.
Any RFP Response submitted to SPP in the TOSP that exceeds the RFP design requirements is
submitted solely at the discretion of the Respondent and should include supporting information.
All references to standards contained herein through reference mean standards as of the date
the project was initially approved by the SPP BOD.
The word should indicates that among several possibilities one is recommended as particularly
suitable, without mentioning or excluding others; or that a certain course of action is preferred
but not necessarily required (should equals is recommended that).
The word may is used to indicate a course of action permissible within the limits of the standard
(may equals is permitted to).
The word can is used for statements of possibility and capability, whether material, physical, or
causal (can equals is able to).
2
The Word Usage section comes from Section 1.3 of the IEEE SA Style Manual and was reprinted with permission
from IEEE. Copyright IEEE 2021. All rights reserved.
2 TRANSMISSION LINES
2.1 GENERAL
Transmission lines shall be designed to meet all applicable federal, state, and local
environmental and regulatory requirements.
Sufficient space to maintain OSHA minimum approach distances in place at the date of project
approval, either with or without tools, shall be provided. When live-line maintenance is
anticipated, designs shall be suitable to support the type of work that will be performed (e.g.,
insulator assembly replacement) and the methods employed (i.e., hot stick, bucket truck, or
helicopter work, etc.).
The SPP territory is located in both the NESC Heavy and Medium Loading Districts. The
Rules for the Loading District in which the line is located shall apply. For lines located in
both the Medium and Heavy Loading Districts, the Rules for the Heavy Loading District shall
apply. All lines shall be designed using Grade B Construction.
Extreme wind applied in the direction causing the most unfavorable effect, but at a
minimum at an angle of 90º and 45º to the wires and structure.
Ice with concurrent wind, with the wind applied in the direction causing the most
unfavorable effect, but at a minimum at an angle of 90º and 45º to the wires and
structure.
The magnitude of the extreme wind load, and the ice with concurrent wind load shall be
selected based on a 100-year mean return interval. The corresponding loads shall be
determined using the ASCE Manual of Practice (MOP) 74, Guidelines for Electrical
Transmission Line Structural Loading. A minimum of Exposure Category C is required.
Proper clearances with design margins shall be maintained under deflected structure conditions.
A geotechnical study shall be the basis of the final foundation design parameters.
All metal transmission line structures, and all metal parts on wood and concrete structures shall
be grounded. Overhead shield wires shall also be grounded, or a low impulse flashover path to
ground shall be provided. Grounding requirements shall be in accordance with the NESC.
The conversion from conductor ampacity to conductor temperature shall be based on IEEE 738,
Standard for Calculating the Current-Temperature Relationship of Bare Overhead Conductors. The
RFP will specify the design wind speed, wind direction, ambient air temperature, absorptivity,
emissivity, and time of day. The Respondent is responsible for determining the value of the
remaining parameters.
3 TRANSMISSION SUBSTATIONS
3.1 SUBSTATION SITE DEVELOPMENT
Transmission substations shall be sited and designed to meet all applicable environmental and
regulatory requirements. Each shall be developed to accommodate the intended electrical
purpose. Sufficient property shall be provided to accommodate predicted growth and expansion.
The final size shall consider future maintenance and major equipment replacement needs.
The design and development of the substation property shall be completed with due
consideration to the existing terrain and geotechnical conditions. Storm water management plans
and structures shall comply with all federal, state, and local regulations. The substation pad shall
be graded such that it is at or above the 100-year flood level, however alternate methods such as
elevating equipment may be considered by SPP.
The SPP territory is located in both the NESC Heavy and Medium Loading Districts. The Rules
for the Loading District in which the station is located shall apply. All line-supporting
structures shall be designed using Grade B Construction.
Extreme wind applied in the direction causing the most unfavorable effect, but at a
minimum at an angle of 90º and 45º to the wires/bus and structure.
Ice with concurrent wind, with the wind applied in the direction causing the most
unfavorable effect, but at a minimum at an angle of 90º and 45º to the wires/bus
and structure.
Extreme ice loading
The magnitude of the extreme wind load, and the ice with concurrent wind load shall be
selected based on a 100-year mean return interval. The corresponding loads shall be
determined using ASCE MOP 113. A minimum of Exposure Category C is required.
A site-specific geotechnical study shall be the basis of the final foundation design parameters.
Surge protection (with the appropriate energy rating determined through system studies) shall
be provided for line terminals, power transformers, and other major equipment as required by
IEEE Std. C62.22, Guide for Application of Metal-Oxide Surge Arresters for Alternating Current
Systems.
The emergency rating is the ampacity that the circuit can carry for the time sufficient for
adjustment of transfer schedules, generation dispatch, or line switching in an orderly manner
with acceptable loss of life to the circuit involved. Conductors shall be selected such that they
will lose no more than 10 percent of their original strength due to anticipated periodic operation
above the normal rating.
For bare, stranded conductors, the conversion from conductor ampacity to conductor
temperature shall be based on IEEE 738, Standard for Calculating the Current-Temperature
Relationship of Bare Overhead Conductors. The RFP will specify the design wind speed, wind
direction, ambient air temperature, absorptivity, emissivity, and time of day. The Respondent is
responsible for determining the value of the remaining parameters.
For rigid bus conductors, the conversion from conductor ampacity to conductor temperature
shall be based on IEEE Std. 605, Guide for Bus Design in Air Insulated Substations. The RFP will
specify the design wind speed, wind direction, ambient air temperature, absorptivity, emissivity,
and time of day. The Respondent is responsible for determining the value of the remaining
parameters.
Substation Insulators
BIL BIL (kV Crest) Heavy
Nominal System L-L
Voltage (kV) (kV Crest) Contaminated Environment
Design loads and load combinations shall be based on the requirements of the International
Building Code or as directed by the jurisdiction having authority. Weather loads shall be based
on a 100-year mean return period.
Wall and roof insulation shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the
International Energy Conservation Code for the applicable Climate Zone.
3.18 METERING
Intertie metering shall be installed in accordance with SPP Integrated Marketplace Protocols,
Appendix C and the Interconnect Agreement with the incumbent Transmission Owner(s) (TOs).
Metering criteria should match those of the connected TO and Transmission Operator.
Substation protection and control equipment shall adhere to NERC PRC and TPL Standards and
this document.
All Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs) shall be synchronized with a satellite GPS clock system.
Power Line Carrier (PLC), microwave, or fiber are all acceptable methods for the redundant
communication path for communications-assisted protection systems. PLC shall not be used for
lines less than 5 miles.
4.4 DC SYSTEMS
For new substations greater than 200 kV, redundant DC systems shall be installed. A redundant
system requires two completely independent DC systems, each comprised of batteries, battery
chargers, and trip circuits. Each DC system shall be capable of meeting the entire DC load
requirement of the substation.
At all voltage levels, battery system(s) of sufficient capacity to support station requirements for a
minimum duration of 8 hours without AC power shall be installed.
The criteria described in Sections 4.5.1 through 4.5.4 shall be used to determine whether one or
two high-speed protection systems are required. While it is possible that the minimum
protective relay system and redundancy requirements outlined below could change as NERC
Planning and Reliability Standards evolve, it will be the responsibility of the Respondent to
assess the protection systems and make any necessary modifications to comply with these
changes.
The table on the next page provides more detail for line protection requirements.
Table Notes:
1) Required in some instances for proper relay coordination or system dynamic
performance requirements. It is the responsibility of the Respondent to assess the
need.
2) The primary fiber path shall be fiber (OPGW, ADSS, or underground) installed on the
protected line where available.
3) If the secondary scheme requires a communication path it may be fiber, microwave, or
PLC.
4) A redundant DC system includes dual batteries, battery chargers, and trip circuits. Each
DC system shall be capable of meeting the entire DC load requirement of the
substation.
5) Unless required by the most recent version of NERC TPL Standards.
For transformers with high voltage windings between 100kV and 200kV, protection shall be
designed with the protection divided into two systems using redundant overlapping zones
of protection. Each system shall provide differential protection schemes and have
independent lockout function. In addition, at least one system shall provide backup
overcurrent protection, and sudden pressure alarm or tripping.
For buses between 100kV and 200kV, protection shall be divided into two systems. Each
system shall provide differential protection schemes and have independent lockout function.