GH Mead NOTES 1696511833464

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

SOCIOLOGICAL THINKERS

GEORGE HERBERT MEAD

Along with Max Weber, the American social behaviourist George Herbert Mead is
credited as laying the foundations for a general approach to sociology called
Interactionism. Symbolic Interactionism focuses on micro-level interaction and the
way in which meanings are constructed and transmitted across the members of
society. G. H. Mead argued that the individual’s self is a social self, produced in the
process of interaction rather than being biologically given. Mead’s theory traces the
emergence and development of the self through a series of stages in childhood and his
ideas on the social-self underpins much interactionist research.

Symbolic Interactionism:
In Mead’s view, human thought, experience and conduct are essentially social. They
owe their nature to the fact that human beings interact in terms of symbols, the most
important of which are contained in language. A symbol does not simply stand for an
object or event: it defines them in a particular way and indicates a response to them.
Without symbols there would be no human interaction and no human society.
Symbolic interactionism is necessary since man has no instincts to direct his
behaviour. He is not genetically programmed to react automatically to particular
stimuli. In order to survive he must therefore construct and live within a world of
meaning. Thus, symbols provide the means whereby man can interact meaningfully
with his natural; and social environment.

Social life can be only proceeded if the meanings of symbols are largely shared by
members of society. If this were not the case meaningful communication would be
impossible. In order for interaction to proceed each person involved must interpret
the meanings and intentions of others.

This is made possible by the existence of common symbols, but actually


accomplished by means of a process which mead terms ‘role taking’. The process of
role taking involves the individual taking on the role of another by imaginatively
placing himself in the position of the person with whom he is interacting. On the
basis of this interpretation he will make his response to the action of the other.

Self & Identity:


Mead argues that through the process of role taking the individual develops a concept
of ‘self’. By placing himself in the position of others he is able to look back upon
himself. Mead claims that the idea of a self can only develop if the individual can get
outside (experimentally) in such a way as to become an object to himself. To do this
he must observe himself from the standpoint of others. Therefore the origin and
development of a concept of self lies in the ability to take the role of another.
The notion of self is not inborn, it is learned during childhood. Mead sees two main
stages in its development;
> PLAY STAGE: It involves the child playing roles which are not his own. For
example, the child may play at being mother or father, a doctor or a nurse. In doing so
he becomes aware that there is a difference between himself and the role that he is
playing. Thus, the idea of a self is developed as the child takes the role of a make-
believe other.
> GAME STAGE: In playing a game, the child comes to see himself from the
perspective of various other participants. In order to play a game, the child must
become aware of his relationship to the other players. He must place himself in their
roles in order to appreciate his particular role in the game. In Mead’s terminology he
sees himself from the perspective of the generalized other.

The game stage yields one of Mead’s best known concepts, the Generalized Other.
The generalized other is the attitude of the entire community. The ability to take the
role of the generalized other is essential to the self: “only in so far as he takes the
attitude of the organized social group to which he belongs toward the organized, co-
operative social activity or set of such activities in which that group is engaged, does
he develop a complete self”. In other words, to have a self, one must be a member of
a community and be directed by the attitudes common to the community.

While play requires only pieces of selves, the game requires a coherent self. Not only
is taking the role of the generalized other essential to the self, it also is crucial for the
development of organised group activities. A group requires that individuals direct
their activities in accord with the attitudes of the generalized other. The generalized
other also represents Mead’s familiar propensity to give priority to the social, because
it is through the generalized other that the group influences the behaviour of
individuals.

Food for thought

• According to Mead, “We play a key role in our own socialisation.” Explain.
• Do you think ‘I’ and ‘Me’ are central terms in Mead’s work?
• “Self and Society are twin born”. Examine the statement of Mead.

You might also like