Assessment of Groundwater Quality
Assessment of Groundwater Quality
Assessment of Groundwater Quality
net/publication/320872676
CITATIONS READS
0 5,853
1 author:
Shashank Shekhar
University of Delhi
159 PUBLICATIONS 1,324 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Changing Water Cycle - The structure and dynamics of groundwater systems in northwestern India View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Shashank Shekhar on 06 November 2017.
10. Acknowledgement
2. Introduction
The groundwater all over the world has emerged as a potential source for domestic
and irrigation purposes. In this case, it becomes important to assess the quality of
groundwater before assigning it for domestic or irrigation purposes. We must realize
that the natural groundwater without any anthropogenic influences and will also
have a baseline concentrating of different dissolved solutes. These solutes are
primarily introduced in to the groundwater system by the process of sediment-
groundwater interaction. This natural groundwater quality varies from place to place
depending upon nature of soil, nature of subsurface lithology, climatic conditions
etc. The dissolved solids in groundwater can be divided in major ions, minor
constituents and trace elements. In general, the major ions of groundwater include
sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium cations and bicarbonate, carbonate,
chloride and sulphate anions. The minor constituents include small amount of
dissolved solids like iron, manganese, fluoride etc. Besides many elements of the
periodic table are present in very small concentration in the groundwater and they
are referred to as trace elements. Further, at some places we can also find organic
compound in groundwater.
When we talk of groundwater chemistry it includes all the dissolved solids in the
groundwater system; popularly referred to as the total dissolved solids (TDS),
including organic compound and trace elements. While groundwater quality is much
more than groundwater chemistry which mainly includes chemical constituents of
groundwater. It also includes biotic constituents of groundwater like bacteria,
physical parameters like color, turbidity, odor etc. The issue here is which
parameters define groundwater quality and what is the standard for these parameters.
There is no universal definition. We must understand that water quality is defined in
perspective of its desired use. Thus, the water quality desired for drinking purpose
will need to be assessed for a set of parameters in comparison to the agreed standard
norm. Similarly, the water quality desired for irrigation purpose will need to be
assessed for a different set of parameters in comparison to the agreed standard norm
for irrigation water. Holistically we can assess the water quality in terms of physical,
chemical and bacteriological parameters for different uses.
The water quality parameters are estimated following the standard protocols
formulated by Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) in India. The analysis is finally
reported by laboratory in unit as given below.
Mill equivalent per liter (me/l) = mg/l ÷ equivalent weight (Ayers & Westcot 1985)
Since water is a basic necessity for life, the quality criteria for drinking and
irrigation uses has been adopted at various institutional levels. The World Health
Organization (WHO) prepares a detailed guideline for drinking water quality. The
acceptable standards vis-à-vis microbial aspects, chemical aspects, physical aspects
like taste, appearance, odour and radiological aspects have been formulated. A
detailed look can be had at weblink:
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/gdwq4-with-add1-chapters/en/
(accessed 12-07-2017). It is not desired to memorize all of them but one should be
aware about availability of the list of standards and they can be referred on the basis
of requirement. On account of socio-economic and geologic variations across the
world, each country has suitably modified the WHO standards and adopted local
standards. In context of India, the Bureau of Indian standards has prepared a detailed
guideline giving specifications for drinking water. The guideline is exhaustive and
has detailed specifications for organoleptic and physical parameters; chemical
parameters and bacteriological parameters. The specification booklet by Bureau of
Indian standard is available from their office on payment basis. Some government
organization has one or other version of the specification on their website (For e.g.
Paper: Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology
GEOLOGY
Module: Assessment of groundwater quality
http://cgwb.gov.in/Documents/WQ-Standards.pdf (accessed 11-07-2017). It
becomes important to study theses parameters as their occurrence in drinking water
beyond permissible limits has serious and damaging effect on human health. Here as
an example we show with help of Fig.1 the damages a polluted groundwater with
respect to certain parameters causes on human health.
Fig.1 A schematic drawing to show the effect of polluted drinking water on human
body (Source: http://www.neerwater.com/images/men.jpg, accessed 11-07-2017).
Plants are sensitive to the water quality used for irrigation; the crop yield depends on
the type of water used for irrigation purpose. The main parameters identified for
assessing water quality for irrigation purposes (Ayers & Westcot 1985) are: Salinity;
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) and specific ion toxicity (Sodium, chloride,
Boron). These parameters are briefly discussed below:
7.1. Salinity: Very high salinity in irrigation water adversely affects plant
growth. The salinity of water is measured by total dissolved solids,
generally expressed as mg/l. The total dissolved solids in water control the
electrical conductivity of water. Now a days hand held devices are available
for estimation of the electrical conductivity of the water. Todd (1980)
elucidates and approximates Logan (1961) and Richard’s (1954)
relationship between TDS and electrical conductivity. It mentions that for
water having electrical conductivity in the range of 100 to 5000 micro
Siemens/cm the relationship is:
7.2. Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR): The sodium content relative to calcium
and magnesium content of the irrigation water controls the rate of
infiltration of water to the root zone of crops (Ayers & Westcot 1985). It has
Na
SAR = (Ayers & Westcot 1985)
√Ca+Mg/2
Fig. 4 C-S diagram for classification of irrigation water (after Richards 1954).
10. Acknowledgements
The content of the module is individual intellectual propriety of the content writer. It
is likely to be used in future for textbook etc. on the topic by the content writer
Ans: a
5. While plotting data in Durov’s diagram the percentage of anions is estimated by
(a) Dividing the particular anion concentration with summation of both
cation and anion concentration in meq/l
(b) Dividing the particular anion concentration with summation of all ions
concentration in meq/l
(c) Dividing values in meq/l with equivalent weigh
(d) None of the above
Ans: d
Paper: Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology
GEOLOGY
Module: Assessment of groundwater quality
6. Trilinear diagram has an advantage that
(a) A large number of data can be plotted
(b) The hydrochemical facies can be visually distinguished on the plot
(c) Both a and b
(d) None of the above.
Ans: c
7. On a Trilinear plot the hydrochemical facies refers to
(a) A cation and anion concentration within a distinct zone
(b) Trace element concentration within a distinct zone
(c) Pesticide concentration within a distinct zone
(d) Partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Ans: a
8. The formulae for Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) is
Na/K
(a) SAR =
√Ca+Mg/2
Ca+Mg
(b) SAR =
√Na/2
Na
(c) SAR =
√Ca+Mg/2
Na
(d) SAR =
√Na+Ca+Mg/2
Ans: c
9. Soil permeability
(a) Gets enhanced by reaction of sodium with the soil
(b) Gets neutralized by reaction of sodium with the soil
(c) Gets extremely enhanced by reaction of sodium with the soil
(d) Gets reduced by reaction of sodium with the soil
Ans: d
1. Todd, David Keith and Mays, Larry W., (2011), Groundwater Hydrology, 3rd
Edn., Wiley India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
2. Ayres, R. S. and Westcot, D. W. (1985), Water quality for agriculture. FAO
Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1. Food and Agricultural
Organization, Rome, 1, p.74.
3. Back, William (1961). Techniques for mapping of hydrochemical facies. US
Geol Surv Prof Pap, 424, 380-382.
4. Freeze, R. A., & Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater (p. 604), 1st Edn., New
Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood cliffs.
5. Hill, R. A. (1940). Geochemical patterns in Coachella valley. Eos,
Transactions American Geophysical Union, 21(1), 46-53.
6. Logan, J. (1961). Estimation of electrical conductivity from chemical analyses
of natural waters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 66(8), 2479-2483.
7. Piper, A. M. (1944). A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation
of water‐analyses. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 25(6),
914-928.
8. Richards, L. A. (1969). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils.
United States Department of Agriculture; Washington.