10.1007@s11696 018 0387 9
10.1007@s11696 018 0387 9
10.1007@s11696 018 0387 9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0387-9
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abstract
In this work for the first time, F
e3O4@SiO2 core–shell nanoparticles functionalized with isatin groups as a magnetic nano-
sorbent was applied for the simultaneous extraction of trace amounts of cadmium(II), nickel(II), lead(II), and zinc(II). The
characterization of this nanosorbent was studied using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy,
energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, vibrating sample magnetometer and thermogravimetric analysis.
The effect of several factors such as pH, amount of sorbent, extraction time, type and volume of the eluent, sample volume,
sorption capacity, and potentially interfering ions was investigated. In the selected conditions, it was observed that the limits
of detection were 0.11 ng mL−1 for Cd(II), 0.28 ng mL−1 for Ni(II), 0.47 ng mL−1 for Pb(II), and 0.21 ng mL−1 for Zn(II),
and the maximum sorption capacity of this suggested magnetic nanosorbent was 120, 112, 100, and 100 mg g−1 for Cd(II),
Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II), respectively. Also, the precision of the method (RSD%) for ten replicate measurements was found
2.5, 2.5, 2.8, and 3.1%, for Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions, respectively. Finally, the suggested procedure was applied
for determination of cadmium(II), nickel(II), lead(II), and zinc(II) at trace levels in different water and agricultural products
with satisfactory results.
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Chemical Papers
(SPE) (Marwani et al. 2015), magnetic solid-phase extrac- 5° and 90° (λ = 1.5). Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA)
tion (MSPE) (Bagheri et al. 2012b; Zhao et al. 2016), elec- were conducted with a LINSEIS model STS PT 16000 ther-
trochemical deposition (El Aroui et al. 2014), and membrane mal analyzer at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 for the thermal
separation (Sanaeepur et al. 2016). Isatin (Isa) is chemically gravimetric analysis of synthesized nanoparticles.
immobilized on different solid supports such as chelating
resin, bentonite, and silica nanoparticles to form various Preparation of Fe3O4@ SiO2 core–shell nanosorbent
solid absorbents, where it has been shown to greatly enhance
the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. Magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (MNPs) were obtained based
Isatin is a kind of strong bidentate chelating agent and has on simple chemical coprecipitation of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions
active functional groups containing N, and S, which act as as reported elsewhere (Saraji and Boroujeni 2014). Briefly,
the chelation with metal cations. 6.1 g of FeCl3·6H2O and 4.2 g of Fe2SO4·7H2O [Fe(III)/
In the current research, for the first time, Fe3O4@SiO2 Fe(II) molar ratio = 2/1] were dissolved in 100 mL distilled
core–shell nanosorbent was modified with isatin ( Fe3O4@ water, and heated at 80 °C for 30 min, then add 10 mL of
SiO2@Isa) and used as a novel magnetic solid-phase sorbent ammonia solution (25 w/w%) dropwise until formation of
for removal and preconcentration of cadmium(II), nickel(II), Fe3O4 occurred. This system was mixed for 4 h by a mag-
lead(II), and zinc(II) ions, and flame atomic absorption spec- netic stirrer in the nitrogen atmosphere. During the whole
trometry (AAS) was chosen for monitoring the concentra- procedure, the temperature of the solution was held at 80 °C.
tion of these target ions. The modified magnetic nanosorbent The product (Fe3O4 NPs) was effectively separated in few
was synthesized by a simple reaction and characterized by seconds by a strong magnet and repeated washing with dis-
FT-IR, SEM, EDS, XRD, VSM and TGA. The sorbent was tilled water thoroughly, and finally, the nanoparticles were
then used to determine Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions vacuum-dried at 40 °C for 4 h. Next, the grafting proce-
in different water and agricultural products and the obtained dure of magnetic particles with silica was accomplished as
results were good. follows:
1 g of the prepared Fe3O4 NPs were dispersed via ultra-
sonic in a solution of 100 mL deionized water, 25 mL eth-
Experimental anol and 1.5 mL NH4OH (25%). Then, 3 mL TEOS was
added dropwise to the solution under stirring until the pro-
Reagents and materials cess of magnetic particles with silica was accomplished
(Sadeghi and Aboobakri 2012). After 12 h stirring at 40 °C,
All reagents used in this study (NaOH, N H3, HCl, HNO3, with help of the external magnet, the formed Fe3O4@SiO2
H2SO4, isatine, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES), NPs were collected and washed with deionized water and
Cd(NO3)2, Ni(NO3)2, Pb(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)2, toluene, etha- ethanol and then dried.
nol) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany),
Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) or Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Functionalization of Fe3O4@ SiO2 core–shell NPs
Germany) without any further purification. Tetraethoxysi-
lane, FeCl3·6H2O, and F eSO4·7H2O were used in magnetic The procedure for functionalizing F e3O4@SiO2 core–shell
nanoparticles preparation and were purchased from Aldrich. NPs was performed in two steps as follows: In the first step,
The stock solution (1000 mg L−1) was readied by dissolv- 1.0 g of F e3O4@SiO2 core–shell NPs were ultrasonically
ing suitable amounts of Cd(NO3)2, Ni(NO3)2, Pb(NO3)2, and dispersed in 50 mL dried toluene in a three neck round-
Zn(NO3)2 in deionized water. bottom flask. Then, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (2.0 mL)
was added to the solution in one portion after stirring for
Apparatus 1 h. The black solid was produced after refluxing under
nitrogen atmosphere for 12 h. Afterward, Fe3O4@SiO2@
Concentrations of target metal ions were performed with an APTMS core–shell NPs were isolated by the strong mag-
Agilent Series AA (model 240 AA) flame atomic absorp- net and washed with water and ethanol several times until
tion spectrometer (FAAS) equipped with the air-acetylene discard any impurities, GO@Fe3O4@APTMS nanoparticles
burner. The FT-IR spectra (400–4000 cm−1) were recorded were dried completely at 50 °C for overnight and were used
by S, 8400 Shimadzu FT-IR spectrophotometer. A scanning in the next step of the experiment. The FT-IR spectrum,
electron microscopy (SEM) (KYKY, EM 3200) and energy- SEM, EDS and TGA analyses were applied to confirm the
dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) (Tescan Mira3, Czech) synthesis of GO@Fe3O4 functionalized with APTMS (Bagh-
were used to analyze the surface morphology. X-ray powder eri et al. 2016).
diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed using a Bruker In the second step, about 1.0 g of the Fe3O4@SiO2@
D8 Advance (Germany) with the 2θ angle varying between APTMS core–shell NPs was dispersed in 50 mL toluene
13
Chemical Papers
containing 1.0 g of isatin and the reaction mixture was the clear solution of eluent. Finally, the amount of analyte in
stirred and refluxed for 24 h in an oil bath at 80 °C in the eluent was determined by its injection into FAAS.
presence of nitrogen. Hereafter, the black solid obtained was It should be noted that the percentage of extraction for
successively collected by a strong magnet and washed sev- the employed samples was obtained using the following
eral times with ethanol to remove excess unreacted materi- equation:
als and dried under vacuum at 40 °C overnight (Fig. 1Sa)
%Extraction = Ca −Cb ∕Ca × 100,
(Electronic Supplementary Material, ESM). Then, FT-IR,
SEM, XRD, VSM and TGA were used for characterizing where Ca and Cb are initial and final concentrations of each
obtained Fe3O4@SiO2@Isa nanosorbent. ion in the solution, respectively (Fig. 1Sb).
13
Chemical Papers
Thermogravimetric analysis
VSM characterization
13
Chemical Papers
Optimization of extraction conditions Isa nanocomposite and extraction procedure was performed.
The obtained result indicated that the better eluent for Cd(II),
Effect of pH Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions from the sorbent was 3 mL of
2 mol L−1 HCl solution (Fig. 7S). Then, the effect of elution
To investigate the effect of pH on the extraction recovery, time on recovery of Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions
10 mL of different aqueous sample solutions containing was studied in the range of 2–20 min. The results indicated
specified amount of analytes (0.5 mg L−1 of Cd(II), Ni(II), the suitability of 10 min for a better recovery.
Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions) was studied in the pH range from 2
to 9. The pH of solutions was set using hydrochloric acid or Effect of sample volume
sodium hydroxide solutions. As can be observed in Fig. 4S,
the suitable recoveries of target metal ions occurred at pH The volume of sample plays an important role in analyzing
6. At alkaline pH, analyte ions convert to M n+(OH)n and real samples and it is effective on the preconcentration factor.
produce hydroxide forms. Thus, they lose their tendency to In a condition in which all solutions were adjusted according
form complexes with amine and oxygen groups of magnetic to the optimum condition obtained for the suggested tech-
nanosorbent and the efficiency decreases. nique, examination of the effect of sample volume param-
eter on quantitative sorption of Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and
Effect of nanosorbent amounts Zn(II) ions was performed using 20 mg of Fe3O4@SiO2@Isa
sorbent in various volumes of the sample within the range
For achieving the highest quantitative efficiency for extract- of 25–1000 mL containing 1 mg of target ions. According
ing Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions, the optimal to the results given in Fig. 4, the recovery of all ions on
amount of F e3O4@SiO2@Isa nanocomposites was obtained. the Fe3O4@SiO2@Isa nanocomposite was obtained more
Thus, varying amounts of nanocomposite ranging from 5 than 98% for the sample volumes up to 800 mL, but it was
to 30 mg were tested. The illustrated outcomes in Fig. 5S reduced when dilution was raised up at higher volume. Thus,
indicated by increasing amounts of F e 3O 4@SiO 2@Isa 800 mL of the sample volume was chosen for the proposed
nanocomposite up to 20 mg and the extraction efficiency extraction method and the preconcentration factor (PF) for
increased in response to the increase of surface area. There- synthetic magnetic nanocomposite was calculated to be 266
fore, the subsequent studies were performed using 20 mg of when 3 mL of elution was used.
nanocomposite to get a satisfactory result. The extraction
recovery was nearly constant with using higher amounts of Effect of potentially interfering ions
the sorbent.
To assess the effect of potentially interfering ions,
Effect of sorption time several common anions and cations with different
Elution condition
13
Chemical Papers
concentrations were added to 100 mL of the solution con- ions. The LOD was calculated based on three times of
taining 0.003 mg L−1 of cadmium(II), nickel(II), lead(II), blank signal (six replicate blank measurements) divided by
and, zinc(II) (Table 1S). The reported tolerance limit was the slope of the calibration curve (3Sb/m) and it was 0.11,
herein defined as the ion concentration producing a relative 0.28, 0.47, and 0.21 ng mL −1 for Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II),
error ≤ ± 5%. The results showed (Table 1S) this technique and Zn(II), respectively. The relative standard deviation
could be suggested for determination of these heavy metal (RSD%) was measured for a standard solution containing
ions in samples with a complicated matrix with excellent specific amount of these ions (n = 10). This value was 2.5,
selectivity. 2.5, 2.8, and 3.1%, for Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II)
ions, respectively.
Maximum adsorption capacity study
Determination of Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions
The total amount of every analyte sorbed per gram of in various real samples
the magnetic sorbent is specified as the highest sorption
capacity of the sorbent. To determine this parameter, the To evaluate the performance of the synthetic F e 3O 4@
batch MSPE procedure was investigated using an aqueous SiO2@Isa nanocomposites, the suggested technique was
solution containing 50 mg L−1 of Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), used to determine Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) in the
and Zn(II) ions, and it was calculated by determining the real samples such as water and vegetable samples (let-
difference between the concentration of analyte in the tuce, broccoli, carrot, cucumber and tomato), under the
solution before and after extraction using FAAS. This optimum conditions. The recovery percentages relating to
parameter was calculated using the following equation: extract analytes from real samples were given in Table 1.
[ ] Table 1 show that higher yields are obtained using this
Q = (C0 − CA ) × V ∕m,
novel nanosorbent.
where Q, C0, CA, V and m are the amount of metal ions
sorbed onto the unit, amount of the composites (mg g−1), ini- Comparison of developed method with other
tial concentration (mg L−1) of each ion, final concentrations published methods
(mg L−1) of each ion, the volume of the aqueous phase (L),
and the weight of the magnetic nanosorbent (g), respectively. Table 2 presents the results of comparing the characteris-
The sorption capacity of magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2@Isa nano- tic data of mentioned method with other previous methods
composite was calculated 120, 112,100, and 100 mg g−1 (Kumar et al. 2000; Pourreza et al. 2014; Silva and dos San-
for Cd(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions, respectively. The tos Roldan 2009; Ghodsbin et al. 2014; ALOthman et al.
sorption capacity of magnetic Fe3O4@SiO2 nanocompos- 2012). According to the table, the obtained detection limit
ite was calculated 50, 80, 37, and 44 mg g−1 for Cd(II), using Fe3O4@SiO2@Isa nanocomposite is significantly
Ni(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) ions, respectively, that depicts bet- lower than other approaches. As can be seen, this magnetic
ter absorption by Fe3O4@SiO2@Isa nanocomposite. Also, nanocomposite has good preconcentration factor comparing
under the chosen conditions, it was observed that Fe3O4@ to other techniques.
SiO2@Isa nanosorbent can be applied six times without sig-
nificant considerable loss in their sorption capacity.
Conclusion
Analytical performance of method
Heavy metal pollutants are considered to be a criti-
For this F e 3 O 4 @SiO 2 @Isa nanocomposite linearity cal contaminant as they pose harmful health risks and
was within the range of 0.2–50 ng mL−1 for cadmium, extraction of heavy metal ions from water solutions is
0.5–120 ng mL−1 for nickel, 1–200 ng mL−1 for lead, and done using different methods and adsorption processes
0.1–90 ng mL−1 for zinc in the initial solution. The cor- (Dahaghin et al. 2017a, b, c). In the current research for
relation of determination (r2) was 0.9966 for Cd(II) and the first time, we introduce a novel magnetic nanosorbent
0.9985 for Ni(II), 0.9985 for Pb(II), and 0.9987 for Zn(II)
13
Chemical Papers
Table 1 Analysis of cadmium, nickel, lead and zinc ions in different water and agricultural products
Solid sample Analyte Real sample Added Found Recovery (%) RSD%
(ng mL−1) (ng mL−1) (ng mL−1)
consisted of SiO2, Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and isatin group the high preconcentration factors of this new developed
and applied for rapid and facile separation of trace quanti- method, trace amounts of heavy metals in high-volume
ties of cadmium(II), nickel(II), lead(II), and zinc(II) ions samples can be quantified using this magnetic nanocom-
from various matrices. The characterization of this novel posite. In conclusion, considering the obtained outcomes,
sorbent was performed using FT-IR, SEM, EDS, XRD, the suggested new nanocomposite is facile, easy and fast,
VSM, and TGA. Low LOD and RSD, and excellent yields and can be used in complex matrices.
with short extraction times are the main advantages of
this magnetic nanocomposite. Another advantage, due to
13
Chemical Papers
FAAS XAD-2 functionalized with o-aminophenol Cadmium 2.0 50 3.42 Pirouz et al. (2015)
Nickel 7.5 65 3.24
Lead 25.0 40 3.32
Zinc – – –
FAAS Nano-TiO2-MBT-FAAS Cadmium 0.12 106 – Pourreza et al. (2014)
Nickel – – –
Lead 1.38 83 –
Zinc – – –
FAAS Cloud point extraction Cadmium 0.74 43 – Sadeghi and Aboobakri (2012)
Nickel – – –
Lead 4.6 43 –
Zinc – – –
FAAS SPE on soft husk of Pistachio Cadmium 0.13 133 – Sanaeepur et al. (2016)
Nickel 0.98 133 –
Lead 2.58 133 –
Zinc – – –
FAAS Multiwalled carbon nanotubes impregnated Cadmium 2.8 – 3.9 Saraji and Boroujeni (2014)
with 4-(2-thiazolylazo)resorcinol Nickel 4.3 – 4.6
Lead 7.2 – 1
Zinc 1.1 – 6.2
FAAS Fe3O4@SiO2@Isatin Cadmium 0.11 266 120 This work
Nickel 0.28 266 112
Lead 0.47 266 100
Zinc 0.21 266 100
a
Preconcentration factor
b
Maximum adsorption capacity
Acknowledgements Due to the support of this work, the author thanks Behbahani M, Hassanlou PG, Amini MM, Omidi F, Esrafili A, Far-
the Semnan University Research Council. zadkia M et al (2015) Application of solvent-assisted dispersive
solid phase extraction as a new, fast, simple and reliable precon-
centration and trace detection of lead and cadmium ions in fruit
and water samples. Food Chem 187:82–88
References Dahaghin Z, Mousavi HZ, Sajjadi M (2017a) A novel magnetic
ion imprinted polymer as a selective magnetic solid phase for
ALOthman ZA, Habila M, Yilmaz E, Soylak M (2012) Solid phase separation of trace lead(II) ions from agricultural products,
extraction of Cd(II), Pb(II), Zn(II) and Ni(II) from food samples and optimization using a Box–Behnken design. Food Chem
using multiwalled carbon nanotubes impregnated with 4-(2-thia- 237:275-281.
zolylazo) resorcinol. Microchim Acta 177(3–4):397–403 Dahaghin Z, Mousavi HZ, Sajjadi SM (2017b) Synthesis and appli-
Bagheri H, Afkhami A, Saber-Tehrani M, Khoshsafar H (2012a) cation of magnetic graphene oxide modified with 8-hydroxyqui-
Preparation and characterization of magnetic nanocomposite noline for extraction and preconcentration of trace heavy metal
of Schiff base/silica/magnetite as a preconcentration phase for ions. ChemistrySelect 2(3):1282–1289
the trace determination of heavy metal ions in water, food and Dahaghin Z, Mousavi HZ, Sajjadi SM (2017c) Trace amounts of
biological samples using atomic absorption spectrometry. Tal- Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions monitoring using Fe3O4@gra-
anta 97:87–95 phene oxide nanocomposite modified via 2-mercaptoben-
Bagheri A, Behbahani M, Amini MM, Sadeghi O, Tootoonchi A, zothiazole as a novel and efficient nanosorbent. J Mol Liq
Dahaghin Z (2012b) Preconcentration and separation of ultra- 231:386–395
trace palladium ion using pyridine-functionalized magnetic nano- El Aroui F, Lahrich S, Farahi A, Achak M, El Gaini L, Manoun
particles. Microchim Acta 178(3–4):261–268 B et al (2014) Electrochemical determination of mercury(II)
Bagheri H, Asgharinezhad AA, Ebrahimzadeh H (2016) Determina- in ambient water at palladium oxide/graphite composite elec-
tion of trace amounts of Cd(II), Cu(II), and Ni(II) in food samples trodes. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45(5):2725–2732
using a novel functionalized magnetic nanosorbent. Food Anal Faraji M, Yamini Y, Rezaee M (2010) Extraction of trace amounts
Methods 9(4):876–888 of mercury with sodium dodecyle sulphate-coated magnetite
13
Chemical Papers
nanoparticles and its determination by flow injection induc- Sadeghi S, Aboobakri E (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles with an
tively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry. Talanta imprinted polymer coating for the selective extraction of uranyl
81(3):831–836 ions. Microchim Acta 178(1–2):89–97
Ghaemi M, Absalan G (2014) Study on the adsorption of DNA on Sanaeepur H, Kargari A, Nasernejad B, Amooghin AE, Omidkhah
Fe3O4 nanoparticles and on ionic liquid-modified Fe3O4 nanopar- M (2016) A novel Co2+ exchanged zeolite Y/cellulose acetate
ticles. Microchim Acta 181(1–2):45–53 mixed matrix membrane for C O2/N2 separation. J Taiwan Inst
Ghodsbin M, Mousavi HZ, Khaligh A (2014) Determination of trace Chem Eng 60:403–413
of heavy metals in water samples by atomic spectrometry follow- Saraji M, Boroujeni MK (2014) Recent developments in dis-
ing preconcentration with soft husk of Pistachio. Eur Chem Bull persive liquid–liquid microextraction. Anal Bioanal Chem
3(4):326–332 406(8):2027–2066
Kumar M, Rathore D, Singh AK (2000) Amberlite XAD-2 functional- Silva EL, dos Santos Roldan P (2009) Simultaneous flow injection
ized with o-aminophenol: synthesis and applications as extract- preconcentration of lead and cadmium using cloud point extrac-
ant for copper(II), cobalt(II), cadmium(II), nickel(II), zinc(II) and tion and determination by atomic absorption spectrometry. J
lead(II). Talanta 51(6):1187–1196 Hazard Mater 161(1):142–147
Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller Tadjarodi A, Abbaszadeh A, Taghizadeh M, Shekari N, Asgharin-
RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabi- ezhad AA (2015) Solid phase extraction of Cd(II) and Pb(II)
lization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and ions based on a novel functionalized F e3O4@SiO2 core-shell
biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110 nanoparticles with the aid of multivariate optimization meth-
Marwani HM, Lodhi MU, Khan SB, Asiri AM (2015) Selective extrac- odology. Mater Sci Eng C 49:416–421
tion and determination of toxic lead based on doped metal oxide Tangjuank S, Insuk N, Tontrakoon J, Udeye V (2009) Adsorption
nanofiber. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 51:34–43 of lead(II) and cadmium(II) ions from aqueous solutions by
Pan B, Qiu H, Pan B, Nie G, Xiao L, Lv L et al (2010) Highly effi- adsorption on activated carbon prepared from cashew nut shells.
cient removal of heavy metals by polymer-supported nanosized Adsorption 141:10191
hydrated Fe(III) oxides: behavior and XPS study. Water Res Zhang H, Ma D, Xie Q, Chen X (1999) An approach to studying heavy
44(3):815–824 metal pollution caused by modern city development in Nanjing,
Pirouz MJ, Beyki MH, Shemirani F (2015) Anhydride functionalised China. Environ Geol 38(3):223–228
calcium ferrite nanoparticles: a new selective magnetic material Zhao L, Dudek J, Polkowska-Motrenko H, Chmielewski AG (2016) A
for enrichment of lead ions from water and food samples. Food magnetic nanosorbent for cesium removal in aqueous solutions.
Chem 170:131–137 Radiochim Acta 104:423–433
Pourreza N, Rastegarzadeh S, Larki A (2014) Simultaneous precon-
centration of Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) on Nano-TiO2 modified
with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole prior to flame atomic absorption
spectrometric determination. J Ind Eng Chem 20(5):2680–2686
13