Dr-HYDER 2
Dr-HYDER 2
Dr-HYDER 2
Research
Abstract
Rhamnolipids are biosurfactants that tend to cause strong foaming, making microbial production in an aerated stirred
tank fermenter challenging. The continuous removal of rhamnolipids from the cultivation broth via in situ liquid-liquid
extraction can remedy this foam challenge, and thereby supports long-term cultivation and production. However, for
efficient processing and stable phase separation, a specialized apparatus is required. In this study, the novel multiphase
loop reactor, which is a modified airlift reactor with an internal loop enabling continuous in situ liquid-liquid extraction,
was designed and adapted to produce rhamnolipids with a recombinant bacterium, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. The
initially designed multiphase loop reactor showed a low oxygen transfer rate, unable to meet the oxygen demand of the
whole-cell biocatalyst, resulting in inefficient growth and production. A re-design of the sparger via 3D printing enabled
a high oxygen supply allowing rhamnolipid production at key performance indicators that matched stirred-tank reactor
cultivations. Advantageously, the multiphase loop reactor allowed stable and constant phase separation and solvent
removal enabling continuous cultivation in the future. Concluding, the successful use of the multiphase loop reactor
for rhamnolipid synthesis is presented, highlighting its potential to become a new platform technology for intensified
bioprocessing.
Keywords In situ liquid-liquid extraction · Multiphase loop reactor · Platform technology · Rhamnolipids · Pseudomonas
putida · Aeration · 3D-printing
1 Introduction
Foaming is one of the major challenges in bioprocessing as it influences many cultivation conditions, e.g., the lack
of nutrient supply for whole-cell biocatalysts residing in the foam [1]. Thereby, inhomogeneities in the reactor and
within the microbial population are induced. In severe cases, excessive foaming causing the reactor to overflow
Maximilian von Campenhausen and Philipp Demling contributed equally to this work.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-
00018-5.
* Andreas Jupke, [email protected] | 1Fluid Process Engineering (AVT.FVT), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen,
Germany. 2Institute of Applied Microbiology (iAMB), Aachen Biology and Biotechnology (ABBt), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen,
Germany. 3Chemical Process Engineering (AVT.CVT), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany. 4DWI Leibniz - Institute
for Interactive Materials, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
results in a loss of whole-cell biocatalysts accumulated in the foam [2], poor process control [1], and most often in
a termination of the cultivation [3].
There are different measures to handle excessive foam either by foam destruction (chemical [4] or mechanical
[5]) or foam prevention by bubble-free aeration [6] or anti-foam agents [7]. Further, the foam has been used as an
advantage to isolate the product by a controlled outflow [8, 9]. Another approach to isolate the product and simul-
taneously prevent excessive foam formation is in situ liquid-liquid extraction of the component [10], which causes
foaming. The product isolation during the process enables continuous production and additionally intensifies the
cultivation by integrating the first downstream unit operation into the bioreactor.
Reactors with integrated in situ liquid-liquid extraction have been assessed previously in different designs [10, 11].
Simple reactor setups used are conventional stirred-tank reactors (STRs) operated in batch mode with both aqueous
and solvent phases homogeneously mixed. The phases are separated after cultivation [12, 13]. A two-liquid phase
batch cultivation of P. putida KT2440 SK4 with ethyl decanoate as a solvent in STRs has been previously conducted
for the production of the foam-inducing class of biosurfactants rhamnolipids (RL) and identified a reduction of the
pH value to enhance in situ liquid–liquid extraction and prevent excessive foaming, although partially compromising
growth and production [14]. Ethyl decanoate as an extraction solvent was specifically selected for the bioprocess
based on its partition coefficient, biocompatibility, safety, recyclability, and settling behavior. However, the intro-
duction of cultivation concepts with an integrated continuous circulation of ethyl decanoate removing RL has been
predicted to further improve the overall efficiency.
Some reactors enable the continuous removal of the solvent phase during the cultivation by integrating a settler
compartment in the reactor [15, 16]. The continuous removal allows the replacement of saturated solvent. This keeps
the driving force for liquid-liquid extraction high and therefore, the concentration of foaming or, in general, inhibit-
ing components low [17]. Furthermore, the replacement is a prerequisite for a full continuous mode for integrated
apparatuses including continuous aqueous feed and purge.
However, in situ liquid-liquid extractions in stirred bioreactors often result in the formation of stable emulsions
due to peaks in shear stress, which cause highly dispersed solvent drops [18]. Analogously to foam withdrawal [19],
continuous removal of the emulsion would lead to the loss of whole-cell biocatalyst, thereby reducing the efficiency
of the fermentation process. Therefore, the presence of a coherent solvent phase is necessary to enable continuous
solvent removal while retaining the whole-cell biocatalysts in the reactor. This requires a reactor setup exhibiting
reduced and homogeneously distributed shear stress. Solvent drops would be larger and more homogenous in size
which enables faster coalescence to form a coherent solvent phase [20]. The solvent could be withdrawn from the
reactor leaving the whole-cell biocatalysts in the aqueous phase.
The novel multiphase loop reactor (MPLR) is based on a non-stirred airlift reactor (ALR) advanced by an integrated
in situ liquid-liquid extraction to allow simultaneous microbial production and continuous product removal [21].
ALRs are commonly applied in biotechnology and wastewater treatment and excel by low and homogenous shear
stress compared to STRs [22]. By transferring this feature to the novel MPLR, stable emulsions are prevented allowing
easier phase separation and solvent recirculation compared to STRs.
The process intensification by the combination of cultivation and liquid-liquid extraction in the MPLR exceeds
sole savings in space at the production site [23]. The intensification also reduces repeated anaerobic residence times
for whole-cell biocatalysts compared to a segmented process with an external loop. In a segmented process, the
anaerobic residence time enlarges quickly with piping coupling operational units for cultivation and liquid-liquid
extraction. Additionally, cell retention, commonly applied for in situ liquid-liquid extraction with an external loop to
prevent the organisms from excessive anaerobic residence times, is not required [10]. Regarding anaerobe residence
times in the MPLR, it was previously shown that a short-term oxygen limitation, the obligate aerobe organism P. putida
might be exposed to in the MPLR, only influences the productivity due to moderately slower growth and production
while the final biomass and product titers remain unaltered [24].
The MPLR with its unique features, most prominently low solvent drop breakage for internal phase separation
and continuous solvent recirculation, is a promising reactor to enable continuous multiphase bioprocesses for
in situ liquid-liquid extractions. Thereby, the described advantages of continuously removing inhibiting products
can be exploited. For the first time, the MPLR is applied to support a microbial production process at a 5 L-scale. The
feasibility of the MPLR concept enabling in situ liquid-liquid extraction with continuous solvent removal to cultivate
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5 Research
the recombinant bacterium Pseudomonas putida KT2440 SK4, previously engineered to produce rhamnolipids (RL),
a class of biosurfactants [25, 26], is assessed. To avoid excessive foaming due to the produced RL, the advantageous
characteristics of the MPLR are utilized and aeration is improved.
2.1 Reactor design
The MPLR is based on the principle of an internal loop reactor. A concentric cylinder separates the downcomer and
the riser zone. The aeration in the riser induces the loop flow of a continuous phase, the medium, pictured in Fig. 1a.
In the downcomer, a dispersed organic liquid phase, the solvent, rises in counter-flow to the medium to the surface
due to a lower density. The solvent extracts compounds from the medium during sedimentation. Inside a 100 mm
tall settler compartment (marked blue in Fig. 1c) at the top of the downcomer, an unstructured stainless-steel mesh
with pore sizes around 2 mm attenuates turbulences and enhances the coalescence of the solvent. A continuous
outlet (Ø 4 mm) for withdrawing the solvent is fixed in the setter compartment slightly above the liquid surface to
maintain the filling volume at a constant level. The wall of the settler compartment extending 63° of the circumfer-
ence of the inner cylinder prevents the cultivation broth, accelerated by the loop flow, to enter the settling zone.
The 5 L reactor glass vessel was made by Eppendorf SE (Hamburg, Germany). The in-house manufactured head-
plate and stand enable the setup of the MPLR-specific internals. The internals are a cylinder, a disperser for the
solvent feed at the base of the reactor, a settler compartment, and a pipe for solvent withdrawal. All these internals
are made of stainless steel (material no. 1.4404). The cross-sectional areas of the riser and a downcomer are at a
ratio of 1:2.1. The dimensions of the reactor and selected internals can be drawn from Fig. 1b.
Regarding the sparger, three different designs were used (Fig. 2a–c). The ring sparger (a) and the frit sparger (b)
are made of stainless steel (material no. 1.4404). The ring sparger consists of three interconnected ring pipes with
upward-facing holes equally distributed across the lower cross-section of the riser. The frit sparger is a sintered
stainless-steel frit covering only a fraction of the cross-section of the riser. The PAM sparger (c) evenly distributes
bubbles across the lower cross-section of the riser through a 3D printed porous poly(dodecane-12-lactam) (PA 12)
spiral with a porosity of 15% and pore diameters ranging from 0.7 to 8.0 µm [27].
Fig. 1 Reactor design with inner cylinder (I, yellow), sparger (S, green), and disperser (D, red): a flow principle of the MPLR (white back-
ground and black arrows: aqueous phase, dark blue background and blue arrows: solvent phase, light blue background: air), b MPLR dimen-
sions in mm and c half section view of MPLR with settler compartment in blue
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
Fig. 2 Sparger designs with 1 cm reference cube: a stainless-steel ring sparger (27 holes, Ø 1 mm); b stainless-steel sintered frit (Ø 17 mm,
32 mm length, pores Ø 10 µm); c sintered PAM spiral sparger [27]
2.2 Reactor setup
The setup of the MPLR for cultivations is depicted in Fig. 3. The probes in the MPLR are connected to two linked BioFlo110
control units.1 Each unit controls one compartment enabling the individual control of the downcomer and riser. Both
compartments contain a temperature, an invasive DO,2 and a pH3 probe each. Temperature and pH probes of either
compartment can be used for control. The set temperature is maintained by a cooling coil and a heating blanket. Both,
the flow through the cooling coil and the power of the heating blanket, can be controlled via either control unit. The pH
is controlled with acid and base addition through two internal peristaltic pumps of the control unit receiving signals from
the corresponding pH probe. A peristaltic pump4 (P2) transports the solvent from the 1.5 L solvent reservoir through
the disperser into the MPLR. In the settler compartment, a height-adjustable tube constantly withdraws either gas or
solvent through another external peristaltic pump (P1), retaining a constant liquid filling volume. For solvent-contacting
equipment, solely polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), stainless steel, and boron-silicate glass were used to ensure resistance
against the solvent. Any mixtures of gas can be chosen (in this setup nitrogen and air) to enter the MPLR through the
sparger. The gas flow is controlled by two thermal mass flow controllers5 connected via a 4–20 mA controller linked to
the BioFlo110 control units. An online analytical device6 measures oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in the
exhaust gas. All equipment potentially contaminated by organisms is autoclavable.
P. putida KT2440 SK4 with attTn7::Pffg-rhlAB was constructed and characterized in previous studies [25, 26]. It is a RL-
producing whole-cell biocatalyst, which tolerates temporary oxygen depletion [24]. Its chassis strain, P. putida KT2440
[28–30], is classified as a host-vector system with safety level 1 (HV1).
Cells were retrieved from cryopreserved cultures (20% (v/v) glycerol in lysogeny broth) on agar plates. Lysogeny broth
(5 g L−1 yeast extract, 10 g L−1 tryptone, 5 g L−1 NaCl) was inoculated with a single colony for the first seed culture, which
was incubated at a temperature of 30 °C and a shaking frequency of 300 rpm. The secondary seed culture was incubated
at the same conditions and cells were grown until mid-exponential phase before transferring to the production culture
in the bioreactor. For secondary seed cultures and production cultures, a mineral salts medium (MSM) adapted from
Hartmans et al. [31] (Table 1) was used. P. putida KT2440 produces gluconate, which causes a decrease in pH value. To
stabilize the pH value, phosphate buffer (K2HPO4/NaH2PO4) was added as part of the medium (Table 1). For the produc-
tion cultivation in the bioreactor, the pH value could be actively controlled by the addition of acid or base. Therefore,
the concentration of the buffer was lowered to a third of its initial concentration.
Protocols for STR cultivations of P. putida established by Demling et al. [14] were adapted for the MPLR. Here, 4 L of
MSM were inoculated to an optical density (OD600) of 0.2. RLs produced by P. putida KT2440 SK4 were isolated by liquid-
liquid extraction with 1100 mL of ethyl decanoate as the solvent, which was dispersed at a flow rate of 10 mL min−1
and finally withdrawn from the coherent solvent phase in the settler compartment. The pump for withdrawal was set
1
Eppendorf SE (Hamburg, Germany).
2
VisiFerm by Hamilton Company (Bonaduz, Switzerland).
3
phferm by Hamilton Company (Bonaduz, Switzerland).
4
Masterflex L/S Variable-Speed Drive by Cole-Parmer GmbH (Wertheim, Germany).
5
EL Flow Select F-201CV-20 K-AGD-00-V by Bronkhorst Deutschland Nord GmbH (Kamen, Germany).
6
BlueVary, BlueSens GmbH (Herten, Germany).
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5 Research
Fig. 3 Schematic illustration of the MPLR setup. For simplicity, DO, pH, and temperature probes are collectively pictured as one probe for
the downcomer (1) and one probe for the riser (2). Solvent and solvent-related equipment are pictured in grey
to 20 mL min−1. During the cultivation, half of the solvent remained in the solvent storage tank. The solvent does not
need to be autoclaved before use in the cultivation. For pH control, the probe installed in the riser was used. Adapting
the findings by Demling et al. [14] describing that a lower pH value enhances the RL extraction, the set pH value was
decreased by hand when accumulated foam was on the verge of entering the settler compartment. Aeration with air in
the riser was adjusted within the range of 0 – 20 LN min−1 depending on the dissolved oxygen tension (DOT). Thereby,
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
sufficient oxygen supply for microbial growth was ensured during the cultivation. The temperature was kept stable at
30 °C and was controlled based on the temperature measured in the downcomer.
For RL quantification, a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)7 system with a reversed-phase column8 and
a Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector9 was used. A nitrogen generator10 supplied a constant nitrogen flow for the
detector. A previously described method was applied [32]. Two buffers, (A) acetonitrile and (B) 0.2% (v/v) formic acid in
double-distilled, purified water were used for gradient elution. The measurement period per sample was 15 min. For
1 min, the starting conditions were kept constant at 70% (v/v) buffer A and 30% (v/v) buffer B. Next, buffer A was gradually
elevated to a fraction of 80% (v/v) over a period of 8 min. Subsequently, the fraction of buffer a was increased to 100%
(v/v) within 1 min, at which it was kept stable for 1 min. Thereafter, the fractions were reversed to the starting conditions
within 1.5 min, without further alterations until the end of the measurement period. The column oven temperature and
the flow rate were set to 40 °C and 1 mL min−1, respectively. A sample volume of 5 µL was injected. Four HAA congeners
and four mono-RL congeners could be detected and quantified.
If necessary, aqueous samples were set to a pH value of 7 by titrating with 1 M KOH or 1 M HCl. Thereby, quantifica-
tion bias was prevented. Aqueous samples were treated with acetonitrile in equal volumes to precipitate proteins. The
samples were mixed and incubated for more than 4 h at 4 °C. Subsequent centrifugation (21,000 g, 3 min) and filtration 11
removed precipitated proteins. For the preparation of solvent samples, a vacuum, 60 °C, and 1,400 rpm12 were applied to
evaporate the organic phase. A 50% (v/v) acetonitrile-double distilled water solution was used to resolve dried residuals.
To quantify glucose and the intermediates gluconate and 2-ketogluconate, the samples were centrifuged (21,000 g,
3 min) and filtered.13 A volume of 10 µL of the supernatants was injected into an HPLC system7 with a chromatography
column for acids, alcohols, and carbohydrates,14 coupled to a Variable Wavelength Detector15 set to 210 nm and an addi-
tional refractive index (RI) detector.16 The RI detector was used to quantify glucose, while gluconate and 2-ketogluconate
were quantified via the Variable Wavelength Detector. Elution was performed isocratically. The flow rate of the running
buffer (5 mM H2SO4) was set to 0.6 mL min−1, and the column temperature was kept at 40 °C.
The oxygen mass transfer coefficient (kLa) is the apparatus-specific parameter to describe the oxygen transfer rate (OTR)
from the gaseous to the liquid phase according to the two-film theory [33]. The coefficient describes the change of the
dissolved oxygen concentration in the liquid phase in relation to the difference between the saturated (CO∗ ) and actual
2
dissolved oxygen concentration (CO2 ) in the liquid phase. Expressed as a balance equation neglecting microbial oxygen
consumption results in Eq. (1). Assuming a constant CO∗ and dividing Eq. (1) by CO∗ , the mass transport can be expressed
2 2
as Eq. (2) using the normalized dissolved oxygen concentration in the liquid phase, the DOT. The change of the DOT over
time equals the oxygen transfer rate (OTR, Eq. (3)). Analogous to the OTR, the carbon transmission rate (CTR) describes
the carbon, i.e., carbon dioxide, transport from the liquid to the gaseous phase.
dCO2 ( )
= kL a CO∗ − CO2 (1)
dt 2
7
DIONEX UltiMate 3000 by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, USA) composed of pump module LPG-3400SD, autosampler WPS-3000 (RS),
and the column oven TCC-3000 (RS).
8
NUCLEODUR C18 Gravity 150 × 4.6 mm separation column, particle size: 3 µm by Macherey–Nagel GmbH & Co. KG (Düren, Germany).
9
Corona Veo Charged Aerosol Detector by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, USA).
10
Parker Balston NitroVap-1LV by Parker Hannifin GmbH (Kaarst, Germany).
11
Phenex RC syringe filters, pore size: 0.2 µm, d = 4 mm by Phenomenex (Torrance, USA).
12
ScanSpeed 40 attached to ScanVac Coolsafe 110–4, both by Labogene ApS (Lynge, Denmark) and Chemistry Hybrid Pump RC 6 by vacu-
ubrand GmbH + Co. KG (Wertheim, Germany).
13
Phenex RC syringe filters, pore size: 0.2 µm, d = 4 mm by Phenomenex (Torrance, USA).
14
ISERA Metab AAC 300 × 7.8 mm separation column with a particle size of 10 μm by ISERA GmbH (Düren, Germany).
15
DIONEX UltiMate 3000 Variable Wavelength Detector by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, USA).
16
SHODEX RI-101 RI detector by Showa Denko Europe GmbH (Wiesbaden, Germany).
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5 Research
dDOT
= kL a(1 − DOT) (2)
dt
dDOT
OTR = (3)
dt
In general, for non-limited cultivations, the development of the OTR and CTRis exponential over time under the prem-
ise that the cells grow exponentially and are homogeneous regarding their respiratory activity. A semi-logarithmic plot
reveals changes in the logarithmic slope and therefore changes in the exponent indicating disturbance or improvement
of the organism-specific respiratory activity.
To determine the kLa, a method suggested by DECHEMA17 as standard [34] was used. Accordingly, the DOT is measured
during the aeration of the previously deoxygenated medium and fitted to Eq. (2). For deoxygenation, pure nitrogen gas
was applied to strip the oxygen from the medium until the DO-probe output signal was constant. This value was set to
a DOT of 0%. Subsequently, the sparged gas was switched back to air. The resulting incline of the DOT was used for the
fit, whereas the maximum of the output signal from the DO-probe corresponds to a DOT of 100%.
Parameters influencing the kLa are the reactor geometry, operating parameters, and the used material system [35]. To
compare different reactor setups a PBS buffer (composition in Supplementary Information, Table S1) has been defined
as standard [34]. Thus, it was used in this study. The PBS buffer mimics physical properties like the viscosity and density
of a cultivation system.
The kLa for the ring sparger, the frit sparger, and the PAM sparger were determined for 1 and 2 vvm at the same filling
volume (4 L) at which the cultivations were conducted. The determination was repeated five times.
Bubble size distributions to further understand the dependence of the kLa on the type of sparger were determined.
Instead of the opaque stainless-steel cylinder, a geometric similar inner cylinder made of glass was inserted in the mid-
dle of the reactor. Internals for fixating the glass cylinder had to be adjusted slightly due to the change in the cylinder
material. Bubbles were approximated as oblate spheroids. Thereby, the two principal diameters were manually measured
by correlating the distance and pixel of a taken picture at a defined space in the middle of the riser. The validation by
the measurement with a reference length in the evaluated space precluded a significant impact of the optical length
distortion of the picture due to the change of optical density between the glass and PBS buffer and due to the curved
glass vessel.
A characteristic value of particle size distributions is the Sauter mean diameter ( d32 ). The d32 depicts the diameter
of equally sized spheres, which have the same surface area, and volume of the examined particles [36] - here bubbles.
Deriving from the definition, the d32 is calculated by Eq. (4)
∑ 3
id
d32 = ∑ i2 (4)
i di
whereas each bubble diameter di was calculated from the average of the principal diameters of the bubbles.
To characterize the bubble size distribution of the ring sparger, the frit sparger, and the PAM sparger, six different
aeration rates ranging from 0.5 to 3 vvm were examined in a 5 cm by 5 cm plane located 2 cm above the sparger in the
center of the reactor after stationary fluid dynamics have been established visually. For the aqueous medium the same
volume (4 L) of PBS buffer, also used for determining the kLa (see above), was used.
17
DECHEMA Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e.V. (Frankfurt a.M., Germany).
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
3 Results
3.1 Reference cultivation with ring sparger assesses the functionality of the MPLR
This cultivation was the first time the MPLR was applied for microbial production. The protocol was based on previ-
ously performed benchmark cultivations in STRs and experiments assessing the coalescence performance [14]. The
resulting data for the DOTs in the riser and downcomer, OTR, CTR, respiratory quotient (RQ), pH value, and concentra-
tions in the phases are plotted in Fig. 4a-d.
Although the basic MPLR concept regarding fluid dynamics worked visually as intended, the DOT values decreased
rapidly in both compartments within 78 min after inoculation. The DOT value in the riser decreased below 30%, while
the DOT in the unaerated downcomer reached even lower values of approximately 10%. Both signals indicate that
the OTR hardly satisfies the oxygen demand of the cells already shortly after inoculation. Although increasing the
aeration rate at 78 min from 3.2 to 4.8 L min−1 (0.8 to 1.2 vvm) resulted in enhanced DOT values in both the riser and
the downcomer, this was only a temporary alleviation, as eventually the DOT decreased to 0% after 160 min in the
downcomer and after 210 min in the riser. Thus, the cells were exposed to oxygen limitation in both compartments.
Consequently, the production of RL was limited. The concentration of RL did not increase for at least 130 min. After
this unproductive phase, the concentration of RL in the circulating organic phase increased to 640 mg L−1. Notably,
the produced RL were successfully extracted keeping the concentration in the aqueous phase at constantly low
values between 20 and 30 mg L−1.
The reactor could be operated until 230 min without a significant amount of foam in the headspace. Afterward,
increasing RL concentrations led to excessive foam formation. For the STR benchmark cultivation, it was shown that
lower pH values result in higher partition coefficients for RL when extracted with ethyl decanoate. Higher affinity to
(a) (b)
100 10 5
7
Sp. aeration rate [L L-1 min-1]
DOT (riser, downcomer ) [%]
80 6 8 4
5
60 6 3
4
RQ
pH [-]
40 3 4 2
2
20 2 1
1
0 0 0 0
05 0 100 150 200 250 300 350 05 0 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time [min] Time [min]
(c) (d)
700 8
0.35 linear fit to ln(OTR) with
600
Rhamnolipids [mg L-1]
400 p. 3
organic phase 4
300 p. 2 period 4
period 1
200 0.07
2
0.35
-1.37 1.26
20 0
aqueous phase
10
-2
05 0 100 150 200 250 300 350 05 0 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time [min] Time [min]
Fig. 4 Kinetic of P. putida KT2440 SK4 cultivation in the MPLR. a DOTs, specific aeration rate, pH, b OTR, CTR, RQ c concentration of RLs in
aqueous (light blue) and organic phases (dark blue), and d the logarithmic OTR with a linear fit and marked slopes over time. The shaded
background mark periods as annotated in d depending on the slope of the linear fit to ln (OTR)
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5 Research
the solvent is hypothesized to be attributed to the lower polarity of the protonated form of RL [14]. Adapting this
strategy, the pH value was reduced here, too. A decrease from a pH value of 7 to 6.5 resulted in the intended collapse
of the foam preventing any further foaming during the remaining cultivation.
The sudden decrease in pH value also shifted the dissociation equilibrium between the carbon dioxide and carbonic
acid to the prior. Due to the degassing of unsolvable carbon dioxide, the CTR increased rapidly (Fig. 4b). However, this
effect was limited to immediately after acid addition. Further, the CTR increased at 78 min after inoculation, simultane-
ously with the increase of the aeration rate. This CTR increase is caused by a non-microbiological effect, as the higher
aeration rate stripped additional carbon dioxide from the cultivation broth and the solvent. However, this disequilibrium
leveled during the following 60 min.
Although the biomass concentration could not be measured due to the present ethyl decanoate, growth can be quali-
tatively estimated by the OTR development during the cultivation. However, different overlaying phenomena influencing
the metabolism, solubility, and concentration profiles in the MPLR led to an inconclusive OTR signal, and consequentially
an ambiguous respiratory quotient (RQ).
The cultivation was terminated due to severe oxygen limitation 340 min after inoculation. In total, both phases con-
tained 0.82 g RL. However, the supplied glucose was not fully converted, resulting in a yield of 0.02 gRL gGlc−1 if the
remaining glucose is regarded as waste. Consequently, the RL production neither reached the anticipated production
rate (0.02 vs. 0.13 gRL L−1 h−1) nor yield (0.02 vs. 0.12 gRL gGlc−1) of the benchmark two-liquid phase cultivation in the STR
[14]. The main bottleneck and highest potential for improvement were determined to be the maximal OTR.
To improve the OTR and thereby remedy the oxygen limitation as observed in the initial cultivation, the efficiency of the
aeration was evaluated. The straightforward solution, the use of oxygen-enriched air, has not been assessed because
of increasing fire hazards and operating costs. Instead, different sparger designs were tested to decrease the d32 of the
bubbles, which is inversely proportional to the OTR.
The ring sparger with relatively large holes of 1 mm (Fig. 2a) dispersed bubbles with constant but high d32 of around
7.5 mm for all tested aeration rates from 0.5 to 3 vvm (cf. Fig. 5). To increase the volumetric surface area of the bubbles a
metal sintered frit (Fig. 2b) was installed as a first measure. The frit sparger, consisting of finely porous metal, dispersed
smaller and more homogeneous bubbles than the ring sparger. However, bubble sizes of the frit sparger increased almost
linearly with increasing aeration rate from a comparatively low d32 of 2.1 mm at 0.5 vvm to 6.0 mm at 3 vvm. During the
experiment, coalescence could be observed at higher aeration rates resulting in outliers as marked in the box plot for
25%~75%
2 Range within 1.5lQR
Median line
Mean
0 Outliers
Sauter diameter d32
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
an aeration rate of 3 vvm at 8.7 mm. This was due to a local higher holdup with smaller distances between the bubbles
by dispersing the same gas volume through a smaller cross-sectional area. These coalesced bubbles have a significantly
increasing impact on the d32 due to the cubic and quadratic relation between a sphere’s diameter and volume, i.e., bigger
bubbles have an unproportionally higher impact on the volumetric surface area than smaller bubbles (Eq. (4)).
Increasing kLa-values are expected with decreasing bubble sizes and increasing aeration rates. The effect of bubble
sizes can be shown by comparing the kLa-values, e.g., between ring and frit sparger at the lowest assessed aeration rate
of 1 vvm (Fig. 6). The kLa-value of the frit sparger (30.1 h−1) was measured to be 28% higher compared to the kLa-value
of the ring sparger (23.3 h−1). However, regarding the aeration rate, the increase from 0.5 vvm to 3 vvm also increased
the d32 of the bubbles supplied by the frit sparger approximately linearly. Although a higher kLa-value is expected due
to higher aeration rates, this increase of the d32 acts contrarily, resulting in a lower kLa-value. In fact, the kLa-value of the
reactor setup operated at 2 vvm with the frit sparger (26.6 h−1) is even lower than the kLa-value when the ring sparger
is installed (38.6 h−1), although the d32 of the bubbles from the frit sparger is smaller than the d32 of the bubbles from
the ring sparger.
Neither dispersing over the larger cross-sectional area spanned by the ring sparger nor dispersing small bubbles
through the porous structure of the frit sparger sufficiently increased the OTR. Consequently, to combine these features, a
3D-printed PAM sparger was designed and constructed (cf. Fig. 2c). Combining a large cross-sectional area with a porous
structure for smaller bubbles in the PAM sparger resulted in a homogenous holdup distribution across the cross-sectional
area of the MPLR and therefore in less coalescence of the finely dispersed bubbles. The bubbles dispersed by the PAM
sparger were distributed evenly and at a constant low d32 of about 2.5 mm, unaffected by the aeration rate (Fig. 5). Addi-
tionally, the PAM sparger produced a narrow bubble size distribution for all tested aeration rates. These improvements
introduced by the PAM sparger resulted in kLa-values two- to threefold higher (95 h−1, Fig. 6) compared to aeration with
the ring sparger, with almost no influence by the rate of aeration.
3.3 The redesigned sparger facilitates sufficient oxygen supply for a successful batch cultivation
To alleviate the limited oxygen supply observed during the first cultivation in the MPLR, the original ring sparger was
exchanged with the 3D-printed PAM sparger. The improved cultivation setup successfully allowed the maintenance of
the DOT in the riser at above 50% via manual regulation during the whole cultivation period of about 13 h. Accordingly,
the specific aeration rate was increased stepwise from 0.6 to 2.3 vvm whenever the DOT reached the lower boundary of
50% in the riser (Fig. 7a).
80
kLa [h-1]
60
40
20
0
1 2 1 2 1 2
Ring Frit PAM
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5 Research
(b)
(a)
100 8 2
60 20
RQ [-]
pH [-]
4 1
15
40
10
2
20
5
0 0 0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Time [h] Time [h]
(c) (d)
4k 12 8
Rhamnolipids [mg L-1]
3k 10 6
Glucose [g L-1]
period 4
2k 8
ln(OTR) [-]
p2 p3
4
period 1 0.24
1k organic phase 6
0.64
2
4 0.30
20 2 0
10 aqueous phase 0.30 linear fit to ln(OTR) with
annotated slope [h-1]
0 -2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Time [h] Time [h]
Fig. 7 Measured data of cultivation with PAM sparger with a DOTs, specific aeration rate, pH, b OTR, CTR, RQ c concentration of glucose
(green triangles) and RLs (black dots) in aqueous (light blue dashes) and organic phases (dark blue dashes), and d the logarithmic OTR with
linear fits and marked slopes over time. The shaded background mark periods annotated in d depend on the slope of the linear fit to ln(OTR)
During this cultivation the organism exhibited four periods of different oxygen consumption rates, which are observ-
able in the slope of the logarithmic OTR depicted in Fig. 7d. Neglecting the oxygen storage capability in the medium, the
OTR equals the OUR. Therefore, the slope of the logarithmic OTR correlates with the growth rate, which, in turn, influences
the production rate of the organism, as presented in the data.
Referring to the marked periods in the course of the logarithmic OTR, period 1 is dominated by a relatively low slope of
0.30 h−1 compared to 0.45 h−1 for the benchmark STR at the same pH value [14]. However, comparing the slope of period 1
to period 2 reveals that increasing the aeration rate led to an elevated slope of 0.64 h−1 compared to the benchmark.
Therefore, it is hypothesized that the additional mixing effect due to an increased velocity of the loop flow at higher
aeration rates positively affected the organism’s metabolic state. The better mixing is underlined by the increase of the
DOT in the downcomer in period 2 (Fig. 7, p 2) close to leveling up with the controlled DOT in the riser.
Starting with period 3 (p 3) excessive foaming required a stepwise reduction of the pH from 6.3 to 5.7. Thus, impair-
ment due to foaming could be prevented. However, referring to Fig. 7b and c, RL production, glucose consumption, and
data from the exhaust gas analytics substantially deviated from an exponential course during this period. Also, coincid-
ing with each addition of sulfuric acid, the DOTs in the riser and downcomer increased although the aeration remained
unaltered (Fig. 7a). This indicates increased stress for the cells by a reduction of the pH value and potential pH gradients.
The stress and subsequent recovery of the cells caused by the addition of acid are also reflected in the logarithmic OTR.
When the pH remained unaltered at a value of 5.7 after 8.5 h (p 3), the slope of the logarithmic OTR stabilized at 0.24 h−1
until glucose depletion. The lower value compared to previous phases is due to the deviation from an optimal pH range
for P. putida KT2440 [14].
During the whole cultivation, the RQ ranged from 0.7 to 1.1 indicating glucose consumption. The concentrations of glu-
conate and 2-ketogluconate stayed below 0.5 g L−1 (Supplementary Information, Figure S2) and were depleted after 12.8 h
simultaneously with glucose. The RL concentration stayed below 25 mg L−1 in the aqueous phase during the whole cultivation
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
by successfully accumulating the RL in the circulating organic phase to a titer of 3.6 g L−1. A product yield of 0.11 gRL gGlc−1
and a productivity of 0.08 gRL L−1 h−1 were achieved.
Previously, a two-liquid phase cultivation for the production of RL with recombinant P. putida in a bench-scale STR was
developed [14]. In fact, besides the reactor, the cultivations including strain, extraction solvent, and media composition
in the presented study were identical to the mentioned STR cultivation. While yields were similar in both systems (MPLR:
0.11 gRL gGlc−1, STR: 0.12 gRL gGlc−1), the productivity in the MPLR was lower (MPLR: 0.08 gRL L−1 h−1, STR: 0.13 gRL L−1 h−1).
The reduced productivity is most likely due to two reasons revealed in this study, which urge two major aspects for
improvement: (1) A more gradual addition of acid and base to a region of high turbulence to avoid gradients when
adjusting the pH value, and (2) increasing the power input for better mixing and an enhanced loop flow velocity by a
higher aeration rate to elevate the overall metabolic activity. The production of RL in STRs in dynamic batch or fed-batch
modes requires an ongoing decrease of the pH value, thereby increasingly diverging from an optimal range, which has
been shown to restrict growth and production. Phase separation as a prerequisite for a continuous mode is impractica-
ble for two-liquid phase cultivations in STRs producing RL due to stable emulsions caused by high shear rates resulting
from agitation [14]. In the MPLR, however, continuous separation of the extraction solvent is possible enabling a fully
continuous mode of operation. As the RL can be removed from the system, the continuous cultivation can reach a steady
state, and consequently, the pH does not need to be lowered to an unfavorable level.
Other cultivation strategies for RL production involve external loops for directed foaming-out and partial foam frac-
tionation [37, 38]. A rather long loop trajectory potentially results in performance-diminishing high anaerobic residence
times or even a loss of the whole-cell biocatalyst. However, in the MPLR, anaerobic residence times are minimized due to
a short trajectory of the cells in the non-actively aerated downcomer. Furthermore, the process-intensifying MPLR spares
space and equipment compared to, e.g., a directed outflow of the foam requiring highly voluminous tanks of multiple
sizes of the actual reactor [4]. The operation of the MPLR only requires a small additional solvent storage tank, smaller
in size compared to the reactor itself.
While demonstrated for the production of RL, the MPLR bears the potential for applications in bioprocesses with
other whole-cell biocatalysts synthesizing various products. Due to the in situ liquid-liquid extraction, the MPLR can
be particularly advantageous for product-inhibited bioprocesses [39], especially when operated in continuous mode.
Due to the lower and more homogeneously dissipated shear stress compared to STRs, organisms that are more shear-
sensitive than bacteria, such as mammalian, insect, or plant cells [23], can be cultivated. Performing a variety of different
bioprocesses in the reactor establishes the reactor as a platform technology in the bioeconomy.
However, further research and development are required to reduce the technological risks. This study forms an inter-
mediate step towards a fully continuous fermentation. The material system previously established in STRs was success-
fully transferred to the MPLR. Due to the dynamic nature of the batch mode performed here, various operating points
were tested over a period of time. A fully continuous operation can be achieved by an additional feed and purge for the
aqueous phase, as well as a continuous removal and addition of solvent to the solvent circuit. Once established it may
reveal further insights into the genetic stability of the microorganism and instabilities of the overall system and may
indicate the limit of practically possible space-time yield.
Furthermore, relations of fluid dynamics to aeration and extraction as well as ideal geometrical parameters such as
filling volume and riser-to-downcomer ratio need to be determined. Additionally, turbulences and laminar or stagnant
zones need to be localized, potentially leading to a refinement of the geometrical design. The refined setup can sub-
sequently be applied in a continuous cultivation, ideally including an adjacent online solvent recovery unit. Further,
insights into the scalability of the MPLR need to be gained, and an economic evaluation in comparison to conventional
cultivation systems has to be conducted. Ongoing improvement, customization, and evaluation of the MPLR will increase
its technology readiness level and establish it as a platform technology for bioprocesses.
5 Conclusion
The advancement of the envisaged bioeconomy is rapidly progressing, and it has underlined its enormous potential to
contribute to circular, zero-waste resource utilization. With increasing complexity and requirements of processes and
whole-cell biocatalysts, specialized process solutions, including tailored bioreactors, are demanded. In this regard, the
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5 Research
functionality of the MPLR for sustaining a microbial bioprocess with integrated in situ extraction with continuous solvent
removal was demonstrated in this work. Excessive foaming during the production of RL was prevented while performing
equally well as reference cultivations in STRs with the advantage of allowing full continuous mode. By further refining
and tailoring the MPLR for challenging bioprocesses it bears the potential to advance into a platform technology and
thereby support the transformation towards a circular bioeconomy in the future.
Acknowledgements The authors thank Steffen Dietz and Tammo Schüler for experimental support and Katharina Saur and Tobias Karmainski
for proofreading the manuscript.
Author contributions All experiments: MVC, PD. Seed cultures, media preparation, and analytics: PD. Sparger construction: AS, PB. Interpreted
results: MVC, PD, PB, TT, LMB, AJ, MW. Drafted the manuscript: MVC, PD. Revised and edited the manuscript: TT, LMB, AJ, MW. All authors com-
mented on the manuscript before publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The project on which this report is based was funded by the German
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the funding codes 031B0350A and 031B0350B. The PAM sparger was financed by
the Innovation Sprint of the RWTH Aachen Innovation by the ‘Excellence Start-up Center.NRW’ initiative, funded by the state of North Rhine-
Westphalia. The sponsor is the Ministry of Economy, Innovation, Digitization and Energy. The laboratories of AJ, LMB and MW were partially
funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy within the Cluster of Excellence FSC 2186 ‘The Fuel
Science Center’ (ID: 390919832). The responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors.
Data availability The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on
reasonable request.
Declarations
Competing interests AJ declares that he is inventor of the related patent: A. Bednarz, A. Jupke, M. Schmidt and B. Weber, “Mehrphasen-
schlaufenreaktor und Verfahren zum Betrieb”, RWTH Aachen University, 2017 (PCT/EP2017/054967). LMB and TT declare that they are inven-
tors of three related patents. 1) L. M. Blank, F. Rosenau, S. Wilhelm, A. Wittgens, T. Tiso, “Means and methods for rhamnolipid production”, HHU
Düsseldorf University, TU Dortmund University, 2013 (WO 2013/041670 A1), 2) L. M. Blank, B. Küpper, E. M. del Amor Villa, R. Wichmann, C.
Nowacki, “Foam adsorption”, TU Dortmund University, 2013 (WO 2013/087674 A1), and 3) L. M. Blank, T. Tiso, A. Germer, “Extracellular produc-
tion of designer hydroxyalkanoyloxy alkanoic acids with recombinant bacteria”, RWTH Aachen University, 2015 (WO2017006252A1). PB, AS
and MW declare that they are inventors at the patent application “Verfahren zur Additiven Fertigung poröser gasdurchlässiger Formkörper
mit steuerbarer Porosität” (filed with the German Patent and Trademark Office on 30/06/2021; official file number: 10 2021 116 862.7). Apart
from that, the authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be
construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta-
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article
are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://c reati vecom
mons.o
rg/l icens es/b
y/4.0
/.
References
1. Vardar-Sukan F. Foaming: consequences, prevention and destruction. Biotechnol Adv. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(98)
00010-X.
2. Varley J, Brown AK, Boyd J, Dodd PW, Gallagher S. Dynamic multi-point measurement of foam behaviour for a continuous fermentation
over a range of key process variables. Biochem Eng J. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.02.012.
3. Tiso T. Foaming in biotechnological processes – Challenges and opportunities (in preparation). Discover Chem. Eng. 2022.
4. Bator I, Karmainski T, Tiso T, Blank LM. Killing two birds with one stone – Strain engineering facilitates the development of a unique
rhamnolipid production process. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00899.
5. Delvigne F, Lecomte J. Foam formation and control in bioreactors. In: Flickinger MC, editor. Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology.
Hoboken: Wiley; 2009.
6. Bongartz P, Bator I, Baitalow K, Keller R, Tiso T, Blank LM, Wessling M. A scalable bubble-free membrane aerator for biosurfactant produc-
tion. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27822.
7. Beuker J, Barth T, Steier A, Wittgens A, Rosenau F, Henkel M, Hausmann R. High titer heterologous rhamnolipid production. AMB Express.
2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0298-5.
8. Anic I, Apolonia I, Franco P, Wichmann R. Production of rhamnolipids by integrated foam adsorption in a bioreactor system. AMB Express.
2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0651-y.
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Discover Chemical Engineering (2023) 3:2 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s43938-023-00018-5
9. Blesken CC, Strümpfler T, Tiso T, Blank LM. Uncoupling foam fractionation and foam adsorption for enhanced biosurfactant synthesis and
recovery. Microorganisms. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8122029.
10. Freeman A, Woodley JM, Lilly MD. In situ product removal as a tool for bioprocessing. Biotechnology (N Y). 1993. https://doi.org/10.1038/
nbt0993-1007.
11. López-Garzón CS, Straathof AJJ. Recovery of carboxylic acids produced by fermentation. Biotechnol Adv. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biotechadv.2014.04.002.
12. Badhwar P, Kumar P, Dubey KK. Extractive fermentation for process integration and amplified pullulan production by A. pullulans in
aqueous two phase systems. Sci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37314-y.
13. Verhoef S, Wierckx N, Westerhof RGM, de Winde JH, Ruijssenaars HJ. Bioproduction of p-hydroxystyrene from glucose by the solvent-
tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas putida S12 in a two-phase water-decanol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009. https://doi.org/
10.1128/AEM.02186-08.
14. Demling P, von Campenhausen M, Grütering C, Tiso T, Jupke A, Blank LM. Selection of a recyclable in situ liquid-liquid extraction solvent
for foam-free synthesis of rhamnolipids in a two-phase fermentation. Green Chem. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02885A.
15. Pappas T, Oudshoorn A. Enabling cost effeective butanol production with DAB.bio’s unique biorecator technology. Latest updates and
news. DAB. 2022. https://dab.bio/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/DAB.bio-butanol-tech-report.pdf. Accessed 30 Aug 2022.
16. Teke GM, Pott RWM. Design and evaluation of a continuous semipartition bioreactor for in situ liquid-liquid extractive fermentation.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27550.
17. Hanson C. Recent advances in liquid-liquid extraction. Oxford: Pergamon; 1975.
18. Chen HT, Middleman S. Drop size distribution in agitated liquid-liquid systems. AIChE J. 1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690130529.
19. Dorobantu LS, Yeung AKC, Foght JM, Gray MR. Stabilization of oil-water emulsions by hydrophobic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.10.6333-6336.2004.
20. Chen D, Pu B. Studies on the Binary Coalescence Model. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.7817.
21. Bednarz A, Jupke A, Schmidt M, Weber B, inventors; Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische University (RWTH) Aachen. Multi-phase loop
reactor and method of operation. 2017 Mar 2.
22. Guieysse B, Quijano G, Muñoz R. Airlift bioreactors. In: comprehensive biotechnology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011. p. 199–212.
23. Reay D, Ramshaw C, Harvey A. Chapter 2 - Process intensification – an overview. In: Reay D, Ramshaw C, Harvey A, editors. Process inten-
sification. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2008. p. 21–45.
24. Demling P, Ankenbauer A, Klein B, Noack S, Tiso T, Takors R, Blank LM. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 endures temporary oxygen limitations.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27938.
25. Tiso T, Zauter R, Tulke H, Leuchtle B, Li W-J, Behrens B, Wittgens A, Rosenau F, Hayen H, Blank LM. Designer rhamnolipids by reduction of
congener diversity: production and characterization. Microb Cell Fact. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0838-y.
26. Wittgens A, Tiso T, Arndt TT, Wenk P, Hemmerich J, Müller C, Wichmann R, Küpper B, Zwick M, Wilhelm S, Hausmann R, Syldatk C, Rosenau
F, Blank LM. Growth independent rhamnolipid production from glucose using the non-pathogenic Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Microb
Cell Fact. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-80.
27. Bongartz P, Scheele A, Matthias W, inventors; Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische University (RWTH) Aachen. Verfahren zur Additiven
Fertigung poröser gasdurchlässiger Formkörper mit steuerbarer Porosität.
28. Bagdasarian M, Lurz R, Rückert B, Franklin F, Bagdasarian MM, Frey J, Timmis KN. Specific-purpose plasmid cloning vectors II. Broad host
range, high copy number, RSF 1010-derived vectors, and a host-vector system for gene cloning in Pseudomonas. Gene. 1981. https://
doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(81)90080-9.
29. Kampers LFC, Volkers RJM, dos Santos M, Vitor AP. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is HV1 certified, not GRAS. Microb Biotechnol. 2019. https://
doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13443.
30. Nakazawa T. Travels of a Pseudomonas, from Japan around the world. Environ Microbiol. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.
00310.x.
31. Hartmans S, Smits JP, van der Werf MJ, Volkering F, de Bont JAM. Metabolism of styrene oxide and 2-phenylethanol in the styrene-
degrading Xanthobacter Strain 124X. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.55.11.2850-2855.1989.
32. Bator I, Wittgens A, Rosenau F, Tiso T, Blank LM. Comparison of three xylose pathways in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for the synthesis of
valuable products. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00480.
33. Whitman WG. The two film theory of gas absorption. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(62)90032-7.
34. Meusel W, Löffelholz C, Husemann U, Dreher T, Greller G, Kauling J, Eibl D, Kleebank S, Bauer I, Glöckler R, Huber P, Kuhlmann W, John
GT, Werner S, Kaiser SC, Pörtner R, Kraume M. Recommendations for process engineering characterisation of single-use bioreactors and
mixing systems by using experimental methods. Studien und Positionspapiere. DECHEMA Gesellschaft für Chemische Technik und Bio-
technologie e.V. 2016. https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/SingleUse_ProcessEng ineeringCaracterisat
ion_2016.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2021.
35. Mießner U, Kück UD, Dujardin V, Heithoff S, Räbiger N. Correlation for kLa prediction of Airlift loop reactors including the gas phase
residence time effect. Chem Eng Technol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201500154.
36. Sauter J. Die Grössenbestimmung der im Gemischnebel von Verbrennungskraftmaschinen vorhandenen Brennstoffteilchen. München:
VDI-Verlag; 1926.
37. Blesken CC, Bator I, Eberlein C, Heipieper HJ, Tiso T, Blank LM. Genetic cell-surface modification for optimized foam fractionation. Front
Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.572892.
38. Merz J. A contribution to design foam fractionation processes. Dortmund: Technische Universität Dortmund; 2012.
39. van Hecke W, Kaur G, de Wever H. Advances in in-situ product recovery (ISPR) in whole cell biotechnology during the last decade. Bio-
technol Adv. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.07.003.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
13
Vol:.(1234567890)