Project and Matrix Management

Project as part of the functional organization For functionally organized projects, the project is assigned to the functional unit
that has the most interest in ensuring its success or can be the most helpful implementing it. Assuming the appropriate functional unit has been chose for the projects home, there are several advantages to this structure: 1. Maximum flexibility in the use of the staff 2. Individual experts can be used by many different projects 3. Specialists can be grouped to share knowledge and experience 4. Functional group can serve as a basis for continuity when individuals choose to leave. 5. Functional organization contains the normal path of advancement.
Disadvantages include: 1. Lack of client focus and concern as the group has its own work to do. 2. Activities are usually oriented toward ones particular to the groups function 3. Occasionally no individual is given full responsibility for the project, resulting in a lack of coordination and ensuing chaos 4. Response to client needs is slow and arduous 5. Tendency to suboptimize the project 6. Weak motivation due to project is out of mainstream of activity and interest 7. Structure does not favor a holistic approach to the project.
Pure Project Organization A pure project organization is separate from the parent system. It is a self contained unit with its own technical staff, administration, and tied to the parent organization only by periodic reports and oversight.
Advantages are: 1. Project Manager (PM) has full line authority over the project 2. Project workforce members are directly responsible to the PM 3. Lines of communication are shorter because there is less intervening management structure 4. Several successive projects of similar kind can benefit from a cadre of experts who move from project to project 5. Project team has a strong, separate identity of its own which results in a higher level of commitment 6. Ability to make swift decisions is enhanced because of centralized authority 7. Unity and continuity of command exists 8. Simple and flexible organizational structure 9. holistic approach to the project Disadvantages are: 1. Duplication of effort on multiple projects due to staffing levels of each project 2. Tendency of PM to stockpile resources and materials to ensure availability when needed, or just in case 3. Members of a high technology project tend to learn a lot about the high tech aspect of their project, but fall behind in other areas of technical expertise 4. Pure project approach tends to foster inconsistency in the way policies and procedures are carried out. 5. Project takes on a life of its own team members develop bonds, a we-they divisiveness grows (projectitis) 6. Worry about life after the project ends tends to make the project last longer than necessary
Matrix Organization Matrix organization is an attempt to combine functional and pure project organizations to couple the positive aspects of both and minimize the negative.
Advantages are: 1. Project as a point of emphasis PM takes the responsibility for managing the project. 2. Project has reasonable access to all required resources without having to maintain them draws from the functional resource pool as required 3. Less anxiety about what happens when the project is completed 4. Response to client is as rapid as pure project 5. Project has access to the administrative units of the parent firm to maintain consistency w/ policies, practices and procedures 6. With several projects in work, matrix offers a better company wide balancing of resources 7. Matrix organizations span the extremes of the organization spectrum from functional to pure project.
Disadvantages include: 1. Delicate balance of focus of decision making power between PM and functional manager 2. Multiple projects have to be monitored as a set to derive the benefits of a matrix organization 3. Strong matrix organizations have problems shutting down projects similar to pure project organizations 4. Division of decision making responsibilities between PM (administrative decisions) and functional manager (technological decisions) is complex and not so clear for the operating PM 5. Project members have at least two bosses, the functional and the PM. This can lead to confusion and disorder.
Mixed Organizational Systems Creating organizations within the larger company structure allows a business to be more flexible and to act like a smaller business. Other organizational structures include organizing products by project, organizing by territory
Choosing an organizational form Choice is determined by the situation, but is partly intuitive. Use the following criteria to narrow the choice:
1. Define the project with a statement of the objectives that identifies the major
outcome desired
2. Determine the key tasks associated with each objective and locate the functional
homes of these objectives

3. Arrange the key tasks by sequence and decompose them into work packages 4. Determine which project subsystems are required and which work closely with
which
5. List any special characteristics or assumptions about the project , e.g.,
technology, length and size of project, potential problems w/individuals, political problems, previous experience w/different organizational methods
6. Recognizing all of the above, choose a structure.
The Project team It is useful to have a project office to serve as a control center, place for conferencing, and focus for all project activity. PMs cube is not the right place for this.
In addition to the PM, other possible key team members include: Project engineer, Manufacturing engineer, Field manager, Contract administrator, Project controller, Support services manager
The PM works from a forecast of personnel needs to staff the project. Charts used to perform this staffing function include the WBS. From the WBS, the skills required to accomplish the tasks are determined, and then the workforce needs established. People to fill these needs are drawn from the various functional departments.
People who are more critical to project success should report directly to the PM. They include: senior team members who will be with the project a long time; people in close communication with the PM; people with necessary rare skills
Political skills are important for a PM, as are negotiating skills.
Acquiring skilled people in a timely manner from functional departments is the art to establishing a project team.
Human factors and the project team Principles and practices of good general management apply to project management as well
Meeting schedule and cost goals is a human as well as a technical problem. This is because project professionals tend to be perfectionists and tend to improve (and change) the product as the project progresses. These changes cause delays which impact the schedule. This is the reason for change control is to ameliorate this tendency. Another problem is team member motivation to accomplish the work. Common motivational methods include recognition, achievement, the work itself, responsibility, advancement and the chance to learn new skills. Project should be structured to emphasize these factors. Participative management is another motivator.
Empowerment is another method for motivating team members

Project and Matrix Management

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project and Matrix Management

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project and Matrix Management

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project as part of the functional organization For functionally organized projects, the project is assigned to the functional unit

homes of these objectives

Political skills are important for a PM, as are negotiating skills.

Empowerment is another method for motivating team members

You might also like