Artikel Revisi AIP
Artikel Revisi AIP
Artikel Revisi AIP
childhood
Ruswanto1*, Al Jupri2
1
Departemen Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No. 229,
Bandung 40154, Indonesia
2
Departemen Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No. 229,
Bandung 40154, Indonesia
E-mail:[email protected]
Abstrak. The development of conceptual and procedural abilities in early childhood is strongly
influenced by learning experiences both in the classroom and at home. The role of parents is to
introduce numbers and their meanings. Furthermore, its application in problem solving in schools
should be introduced under the guidance of teachers. This study aims to investigate the development
of children in recognizing mathematics, from number symbols, addition and subtraction operations.
This study used a case study method with the subject consisting of one child in one of kindergarten in
Indramayu. The results showed that the development of the child mathematical abilities has been
running according to the stages of child development. But in the operation process, especially the
subtraction, it is still difficult.
Keywords: children's mathematics learning development, children's cognitive abilities.
References
Figure 4. sort and compare tasks 1. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia
Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
After getting to know everything that Nomor 20 Tahun 2003.
has been learned both through classroom 2. Wardono et al. 2015. Tehe Realistic
learning experiences and learning experiences at Scientific Humanist Learning With
home, children are able to do calculations with Character Education to Improve
the help of fingers, but the child's ability is Mathematics Literacy Based On PISA.
limited to calculations from 1 to 5. the next International Journal of Education and
stage in learning in class, children have entered Research. Vol 3 No 1 January 2015
the realm of operations both addition and 3. Marina, 2013. A mathematics Intervention:
subtraction. The case of 4-year-old Rylan and Hilda.
Procedia –Social and Behavioral sciences
In addition operations, children do not
106 (2013) 92 – 101.
experience difficulties because they only count
4. Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Future issues for developmental
Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & psychology and education. New York:
Sons, Inc Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
5. Sigelman, C. K., & Rider, E. A. (2012). 18. Sternberg, R.J. & Sternberg, K. (2011).
Life-Span Human development. Belmont, Cognitive Psychology, Sixth Edition.
USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
6. Hockenbury, D. H., & Hockenbury, S. E.
(2011). Discovering Psychology. New York:
Worth Publishers.
7. Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget’s
theory of cognitive development.
Educational psychology interactive.
Valdosta State university.
8. John W. Creswell. (1998). Qualitative
Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing
Among Five Traditions. London: SAGE
Publications.
9. Jupri, A., & Sispiyati, R. (2021). Symbol
sense characteristics for designing
mathematics tasks. Journal of Physics:
Conference Series, 1806, 1-5.
10. Braisby, N. & Gellatly, A. (2005).
Cognitive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
11. Eysenck, M.W. & Keane, M.T. (2010).
Cognitive psychology : A student’s
handbook—6th ed. New York:
Psychology Press.
12. Fatimah Ibda. (2015). Perkembangan
Kognitif: Teori Jean Piaget. Dosen
Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN
Ar-Raniry.
13. Houde, O. (2019). 3-system theory of
the cognitive brain: A post-Piagetian
approach to cognitive development.
New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis
Group.
14. Igra, (2020). Buku Pendidikan
Raudhatul Athfal Semester 1.
15. Igra, (2020). Buku Pendidikan
Raudhatul Athfal Semester 2.
16. Morra, S., Gobbo, C., Marini, Z., &
Sheese, R. (2008). Cognitive
development: Neo-Piagetian
perspectives. New York: Lawrence
Elbraum Associates.
17. Smith, L., Dockrell, J., & Tomlinson, P.
(1997). Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond: