Example No 2-11

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

EXAMPLE NO.

2-11 (SLIDE 83-101)

Example No.2

M=142 and sd =40

1.=239,m=239 df-238

0.01 level at df=238

= 2.342

2.34=x2-142
40/√238 142.6

2.34=x2-148
40/√209 148.6

Since
x1bar<x2bar
there is significant difference between
samples.
EXAMPLE NO.4
A researcher knows that the average height of Filipino women is 1.525 meters. A random sample of 26
womenwas taken and was found to have a mean height of 1.56 meters, with a standard deviation of .10
meters. Is there reason to believe that the 26 women in the sample are significantly taller than the others
at .05 significance level?

EXAMPLE NO. 5

H0:μ=50
H1:μ=50

1. Ho: μ = 50 kilos (Sample came from population with mean of 50 kgs.)


Ha: μ < 50 kilos (Sample came from population with mean less than 50 kgs.)

2. P(Reject Ho|Ho is true)  0.01

3. Test statistic: T (n < 30)


X = tensile strength of steel wire
2
X̄ ~ Normal (50 , σ /16 )

x̄−μ 47−50
t= = =−0 . 8
s / √ n 15/4
4. Reject Ho if -0.8  - t.01,15 = -2.602
Decision on Ho: Do not reject Ho.

5. Conclusion: There is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the results are not in accordance
with the hypothesis that the population mean is 50 kilos.

Note: p-value = P(T < -0.8) when μ = 50, v = 15


= P(T > 0.8), v = 15
> 0.10 since P(T > 1.341) = 0.10

EXAMPLE NO. 6

Ho:70
Ha=70

75-70 14.14
5/√200

P-value
p=2p(z<-14.14)<0.0001

Since the P-Value is less than 0.01,reject the null hypothesis.


We can conclude at 0.025 significance level that the sample is significantly different from the population.

EXAMPLE NO. 7
The following null and alternative hypotheses
need to be tested:

a = 0.05K92J115J62:K94J62:K104J115J62:K94J62:K105J11J62:P102
df = n1+ n2 -30+30-2 =58
a = 0.05
df =58

tc=1.671553
R=(t:t)> 1.671553

Since it is observed that t= 18.309 > 1.671553 =tc, it is then concluded that the null
hypothesis is rejected.

Using the P-value approach: The p-value for right-tailed tes


a=0.05, df 58 ,p=0
The degrees of freedom are computed as follows, assuming that the population variances are
equal:
The critical value for this right-tailed test
α=0.05,df=42.052091 degrees of freedom is
tc= 1.6819
The rejection region for this right-tailed test is
R= (t:t> 1.6819).

Since it is observed that t=18.309>1.671553,=tc


therefore th null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population mean μ1


Therefore, there is enough evidence to conclude that variety A
is the better type at the a= 0.05 significance level.

Example no. 8

H0:μ≤40H1:μ>40
x=45
o=5
n=36

0.01 level of significance.

Let us use α=0.01


Reject H0 if p-value < α.
P-value = 0.000032 < α = 0.01
We reject H0.
We can conclude that the average life of his product will exceed 40 hours.
A company will buy a very large shipment of batteries.

EXAMPLE 9
n 1=n 2 =16
​ ​

x1​ˉ​=40000
s1​=5400
x2​ˉ​=38009
s2​=3200

1991
1569.2
= 1.268

df= n1 + n2 - 2 = 30
tcrit = 1.697
t=1.268 < tcrit+ 1.697
therefor ,there is enough evidence to claim the population mean
is less than the population mean .Brand D is better than C.

Example no. 10
null and alternative hypotheses need to be
tested

Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.01, and


the critical value for a right-tailed test is zc=2.33
R={z:z>2.33}

Z=3.1623 > 2.33


it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach
p= P(z> 3.1623) = 0.00078,
p=0.00078 < 0.01,it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.

EXAMPLE 11
Given that, size of sample 1 is n1=1=5
size of sample 2 is n2=5
a=0.01
Ho: IQ before training =IQ after training
H1= IQ before training ≠ IQ after training

mean sample 1: is x1= 610 = 122


5
mean sample 2: xbar2 =
620 = 124
5

t8, 0.005 = t n1 + n2= 1 a/2 =


3.315

Ho is accepted i.e,IQQ before training = IQ after


training

You might also like