Chapter 3 Kinetics of Electrode Reactions
Chapter 3 Kinetics of Electrode Reactions
Chapter 3 Kinetics of Electrode Reactions
CHAPTER 3:
KINETICS OF ELECTRODE
REACTIONS
Content
1. Review of homogeneous kinetics.
2. Essentials of electrode reactions.
3. Butler-Volmer model of electrode kinetics.
4. Implications of the Butler-Volmer model.
www.knust.edu.gh
Learning outcomes
By the completion of this unit, student should be able to;
Understand Tafel equation and its implication.
Derive the Butler-Volmer equation.
Use the Butler-Volmer model to estimate the kinetic
parameters of electrochemical systems.
Student’s activities
1. Assignment.
www.knust.edu.gh
3.1 Review of Homogeneous Kinetics
3.1.1 Dynamic equilibrium
Consider the unimolecular elementary reaction below
kf
A B 3.1.1
kb
where kf and kb are the rate constants of the forward and backward
reactions. Their unit is s-1.
www.knust.edu.gh
The net conversion rate from A to B:
ʋnet = ʋf - ʋb
Requirement for kinetic models: Every kinetic theory require that the
kinetic equations collapse to thermodynamics relations at equilibrium.
www.knust.edu.gh
The new kinetic model must behave like equation 3.1.5.
𝑘 = 𝐴𝑒 −𝐸𝐴/𝑅𝑇 3.1.7
www.knust.edu.gh
Physical meaning of Arrhenius equation
𝑘 = 𝐴𝑒 −𝐸𝐴/𝑅𝑇
www.knust.edu.gh
Activation Energy and Standard Free Energy of Activation
EA can also be described as the standard internal energy moving from
one minima to the maximum, which is called the transition state or
activated complex.
We know ∆𝐸 ‡ = ∆𝐻 ‡ + ∆ 𝑃𝑉 ‡
but ∆ 𝑃𝑉 ‡ is negligible for liquid phase reaction, so that ∆𝐸 ‡ = ∆𝐻 ‡
Thus, the Arrhenius equation can be recast as
−∆𝐻 ‡ /𝑅𝑇 3.1.8
𝑘 = 𝐴𝑒
www.knust.edu.gh
Or
′ −∆𝐺 ‡ /𝑅𝑇
𝑘=𝐴𝑒 3.1.10
Equations 3.1.8 and 3.1.10 are derived from 3.1.7, but only by
interpretation we apply to the phenomenological constant EA.
www.knust.edu.gh
3.2 Essentials of Electrode Reactions
Consider the general reversible electrode reaction,
kf
O+ ne- R 3.2.1
kb
kf and kb are the rate constants for the forward and backwards
reactions.
For this reaction, the equilibrium state is governed by the Nernst
equation
∗
′ 𝑅𝑇 𝐶𝑂 3.2.2
E = 𝐸0 + 𝑙𝑛 ∗
𝑛𝐹 𝐶𝑅
which relates the potential of the electrode (E) to the bulk
concentrations of the reactants and products (O and R).
Any valid theory of electrode kinetics must predict this result at
equilibrium. (First requirement of any electrode kinetic theory!)
www.knust.edu.gh
3.2.1 Current vs. Potential
Any proposed electrode kinetic theory must provide information
about the dependence of current on electrode potential.
When current is passed, some electrochemical changes must occur
at the electrode.
At low currents, the current is related exponentially to the
overpotential η. That is,
′ 𝜂/𝑏′
𝑖=𝑎𝑒 3.2.3
Or as given by Tafel in 1905,
𝜂 = 𝑎 + 𝑏 log 𝑖 3.2.4
where a and b are constants and i is current. Equation 3.2.4 is known
as Tafel equation.
www.knust.edu.gh
Recall the general reaction,
kf 3.2.1
O + ne- R
kb
- The concentration of O at distance x from the electrode surface and
time t is CO(x,t)
- Hence, the surface concentration is CO(0,t).
𝑖𝑐 3.2.5
- Rate of forward reaction, ʋ𝑓 = 𝑘𝑓 𝐶𝑂 0, 𝑡 =
𝑛𝐹𝐴
𝑖𝑎
-Rate of backward reaction, ʋ𝑏 = 𝑘𝑏 𝐶𝑅 0, 𝑡 = 3.2.6
𝑛𝐹𝐴
where ic and ia are the cathodic and anodic components to the total
current, i.
www.knust.edu.gh
Thus, the net reaction rate is
𝑖
ʋ𝑛𝑒𝑡 = ʋ𝑓 − ʋ𝑏 = 𝑘𝑓 𝐶𝑂 0, 𝑡 − 𝑘𝑏 𝐶𝑅 0, 𝑡 = 3.2.7
𝑛𝐹𝐴
www.knust.edu.gh
www.knust.edu.gh
3.3.2 One Step, One-Electron Process
Let us consider species O and R engaged in one-electron transfer at
the interface without being involved in any other chemical step.
kf
O+ e- R 3.3.2
kb
Let the electrode be polarized from the reference potential, EO’. The
cathodic and anodic activation energies are then ΔG‡0c and ΔG‡0a at
EO’.
If the potential is changed by ΔE to a new value, E, the relative
energy of the electron resident on the electrode changes by
-FΔE = -F(E – E0’)
Hence, the O + e- curve will reduce by F(E – E0’) amount.
www.knust.edu.gh
www.knust.edu.gh
-The barrier for oxidation, ΔG‡a is
‡ ‡ 0,
∆𝐺𝑎 = ∆𝐺0𝑎 − 1 − 𝛼 𝐹 𝐸 − 𝐸 3.3.3
where α is the transfer coefficient and (1-α) is the fraction of FΔE lost
by ΔG‡0a due to polarization.
www.knust.edu.gh
Inserting the activation energies (3.3.3) and (3.3.4), we have
‡
∆𝐺0𝑐 0,
𝑘𝑓 = 𝐴𝑓 𝑒𝑥𝑝 − 𝑒𝑥𝑝 −𝛼𝑓 𝐸 − 𝐸 3.3.7
𝑅𝑇
‡
∆𝐺0𝑎 0,
𝑘𝑏 = 𝐴𝑏 𝑒𝑥𝑝 − 𝑒𝑥𝑝 1 − 𝛼 𝑓 𝐸 − 𝐸 3.3.8
𝑅𝑇
where f = F/RT.
www.knust.edu.gh
Now, let us consider the situation where the interface is at equilibrium
with the solution in which C0* = CR*. Therefore, E = E0’ and
kfCO* = kbCR*, so that kf = kb.
Thus, E0’ is the potential where the forward and reverse rate constants
have the same value. This value is called standard rate constant, k0.
www.knust.edu.gh
3.3.4 Transfer Coefficient
The transfer coefficient, α, is a measure of the symmetry of the energy
barrier.
Using the figure below, α can be obtained from the geometry of
intersection region.
www.knust.edu.gh
-If the curves are locally linear, then the angles θ and ϕ
are defined by
𝛼𝐹𝐸 3.3.12
tan 𝜃 =
𝑥
1 − 𝛼 𝐹𝐸 3.3.13
tan ∅ =
𝑥
Hence,
tan 𝜃 3.3.14
𝛼=
tan ∅ + tan 𝜃
-If the intersection is symmetrical, ϕ = θ and α = ½. Otherwise 0 ≤ α ˂
½ or ½ ˂ α ≤ 1 as show below
www.knust.edu.gh
3.4 Implications of the Butler-Volmer Model for
the One-Step, One-Electrode Process.
3.4.1 Exchange Current
First requirement of any electrode kinetic theory-Any valid theory of
electrode kinetics must collapse to Nernst equation at equilibrium.
www.knust.edu.gh
The exchange current is therefore proportional to k0 and can often be
substituted for k0 in kinetic equations.
-For the particular case where CO* = CR* = C,
𝑖𝑂 = 𝐹𝐴𝑘 0 𝐶 3.4.7
Often the exchange current is normalized to unit area to provide the
exchange current density, j0 = i0/A.
www.knust.edu.gh
3.4.3 Approximate forms of the i-η Equation
(a) No mass transfer effect
If the solution is well stirred, or currents are kept so low such that CO
≈ CO* and CR ≈ CR*, then
𝑖 = 𝑖0 𝑒 −𝛼𝑓𝜂 − 𝑒 1−𝛼 𝑓𝜂 3.4.11
The inflection at Eeq depends on the
exchange current density, j0.
The lower the exchange current
density, the more sluggish the kinetics
and hence large activation
overpotential must be applied.
In case (a), system can supply large
current with insignificant overpotential
because of the large current density, j0.
In case (c), because of the small
current density j0, no significant
current will flow unless a large
activation overpotential is applied.
www.knust.edu.gh
(b) Linear characteristics at small η
Recall, for small values of x, ex ≈ 1 + x. Hence, for sufficiently small
values of η, equation 3.4.11 will become
𝑖 = −𝑖0 𝑓𝜂 3.4.12
⇒ Charge-transfer-resistance, Rct is
𝑅𝑇
𝑅𝑐𝑡 = 3.4.13
𝐹𝑖0
This parameter is the negative reciprocal slope of the i-η curve where
the curve passes through the origin (η = 0, i = 0).
www.knust.edu.gh
www.knust.edu.gh
Problem 3.1
Overpotential measurements at 25oC for the dissolution of a
certain metal in a well-mixed electrolyte yields the following
results:
i (mA/m2): 0.166 0.163 0.158 0.140 0.121 0.100 0.093 0.060 0.0333
ηc (mV): 1.5 3.0 6.0 9.0 18 30 35 60 104
Determine i0 and α.
www.knust.edu.gh
Solution
1. Analytical method
𝑖 = 𝑖0 𝑒 −𝛼𝑓η − 𝑒 1−𝛼 𝑓η
ln 𝑖 = ln 𝑖0 − 𝛼𝑓η
-Plot ln i vs. η
www.knust.edu.gh
-8.6 Equation y = a + b*x
Weight No Weighting
Residual Sum of 0.0128
-8.8 Squares
Pearson's r -0.99724
Adj. R-Square 0.9937
-9.0
Value Standard Error
Intercept -8.7059 0.01947
B
-9.2 Slope -15.92142 0.44814
-9.4
ln i
-9.6
-9.8
-10.0
-10.2
-10.4
www.knust.edu.gh
Slope:
−15.92142 = −𝛼𝑓
Intercept:
−8.7059 = ln 𝑖0
Calculated model:
𝑖 = 1.656 × 10−4 ∗ 𝑒 −15.97η
www.knust.edu.gh
2. Computer method (Matlab)
>> clear all
>> close all
>> cftool
>> eta=[0.0015 0.003 0.006 0.009 0.018 0.03 0.035 0.06 0.104];
>> i=[0.000166 0.000163 0.000158 0.000140 0.000121 0.00010
0.000093 0.000060 0.0000333];
www.knust.edu.gh
The system will generate a plot with linear fit as default. You can
change it to any model. Here, we will use exponential model.
Results
General model Exp1:
f(x) = a*exp(b*x)
Coefficients (with 95% confidence bounds):
a = 0.0001677 (0.000162, 0.0001734)
b= -16.28 (-18.01, -14.56)
Goodness of fit:
SSE: 1.191e-10
R-square: 0.9933
Adjusted R-square: 0.9924
RMSE: 4.125e-06
www.knust.edu.gh
Parameter a:
𝑎 = 𝑖0 = 1.677 × 10−4 A/m2
Parameter b:
𝑏 = −16.28 = −𝛼𝑓
Calculated model:
𝑖 = 1.677 × 10−4 ∗ 𝑒 −16.36η
www.knust.edu.gh
Tabulated results
η (mV) 1.5 3.0 6.0 9.0 18.0 30.0 35.0 60.0 104.0
imea
(mA/m2) 0.166 0.163 0.158 0.140 0.121 0.100 0.093 0.060 0.0333
iCal,Ana
(mA/m2) 0.162 0.156 0.151 0.143 0.124 0.103 0.0947 0.0635 0.0315
iCal,Comp
(mA/m2) 0.164 0.160 0.152 0.145 0.125 0.103 0.0946 0.0628 0.0306
www.knust.edu.gh