Canons of Judicial Ethics
Canons of Judicial Ethics
Canons of Judicial Ethics
4. Essential conduct
He should be temperate, patient, attentive, impartial, and, since he
is to administer the law and apply it to the facts, he should be
studious of the principles of the law, diligent in endeavoring to
ascertain the facts. chanrobles virtual law library
6. Promptness
He should be prompt in disposing of all matters submitted to him,
remembering that justice delayed is often justice denied. chanrobles virtual law library
7. Punctuality
He should be punctual in the performance of his judicial duties,
recognizing that the time of litigants, witnesses, and attorneys is of
value and that if the judge is unpunctual in his habits he sets a bad
example to the bar and tends to create dissatisfaction with the
administration of justice. chan robles virtual law library chanrobles virtual law library
8. Court organization
He should organize his court with a view to prompt and convenient
dispatch of its business and he should not tolerate abuses and
neglect by clerks, sheriffs, and other assistants who are sometimes
prone to presume too much upon his good-natured acquiescence by
reason of friendly association with him. chanrobles virtual law library
They should also require, and, as far as their power extends, enforce
on the part of clerks, court officers and counsel civility and courtesy
to witnesses, litigants and others having business with the court. chanrobles virtual law library
12. Kinship or influence of parties and counsel chan robles virtual law
library
A judge should not, unless it is unavoidable, sit in litigation where a
near relative is a party or of counsel; and he should not suffer his
conduct to create the impression that any person can unduly
influence him or enjoy his favor, or that he is affected by the rank,
position, or influence of any party. chanrobles virtual law library
16. Continuances
Delay in the administration of justice is a common cause of
complaint; counsel are frequently responsible for this delay. Judges,
without being arbitrary or forcing cases unreasonably or unjustly to
trial when unprepared, to the detriment of parties, may well
endeavor to hold counsel to a proper appreciation of their duties to
the public to their own clients, and to the adverse party and his
counsel, so as to enforce due diligence in the dispatch of business
before the court. chan robles virtual law library
chanrobles virtual law library
17. Judicial opinions
In disposing of controverted cases, judges should indicate the
reasons for their action in opinions showing that they have not
disregarded or overlooked serious arguments of counsel. They
should show their full understanding of the case, avoid the suspicion
of arbitrary conclusion, promote confidence in their intellectual
integrity and contribute useful precedents to the growth of the law. chanrobles virtual
law library
20. Review
In order that a litigant may secure the full benefit of the right of
review accorded to him by law, a trial judge should scrupulously
grant to the defeated party opportunity to present the situation
arising upon the trial exactly as it arose, was presented, and decided
by full and fair bill of exceptions or otherwise; and failure in this
regard on the part of the judge is peculiarly worthy of condemnation
because the wrong done is remediable. chan robles virtual law library chanrobles virtual law library
21. Legislation
Judges have exceptional opportunity to observe the operation of
statutes, especially those relating to practice, and to ascertain
whether they tend to impede the just disposition of controversies;
and they may well contribute to the public interest by advising those
having authority to remedy defects of procedure of the result of their
observation and experience. chan robles virtual law library chanrobles virtual law library
24. Business promotions and solicitations for charity. chan robles chanrobles virtual law library
25. Personal investments and relations chan robles virtual law library
A Judge should abstain from making personal investments in
enterprises which are apt to be involved in litigation in his court;
and, after accession to the bench, he should not retain such
investments previously made, longer than a period sufficient to
enable him to dispose of them without serious loss. It is desirable
that he should, so far as reasonably possible, refrain from all
relations which would normally tend to arouse the suspicion that
such relations warp or bias his judgment, or prevent his impartial
attitude of mind in the administration of his judicial duties. chanrobles virtual law library