Potential Uses of Treated Municipal Wastewater in A

sustainability
Case Report
Potential Uses of Treated Municipal Wastewater in a
Semiarid Region of Mexico
Alfredo Valdes Ramos 1 , Elsa N. Aguilera Gonzalez 1 , Gloria Tobón Echeverri 2 ,
Luis Samaniego Moreno 3 , Lourdes Díaz Jiménez 4 and Salvador Carlos Hernández 4, *
1 Comimsa, Calle Ciencia y Tecnología No. 790, Saltillo 400, 25290 Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico;
[email protected] (A.V.R.); [email protected] (E.N.A.G.)
2 Asociación de Usuarios del Agua de Saltillo, A.C., 25000 Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico; [email protected]
3 Departamento de Riego y Drenaje, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Periférico Luis
Echeverría S/N, 25070 Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico; [email protected]
4 Cinvestav-Saltillo, SRNyE, Laboratorio de Revaloración de Residuos. Av. Industria Metalúrgica 1062,
Parque Industrial Saltillo-Ramos Arizpe, 25900 Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, Mexico; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-844-4389600 (ext. 8524)

Received: 31 January 2019; Accepted: 9 April 2019; Published: 12 April 2019
Abstract: This paper presents an assessment of three potential applications of municipal treated
wastewater in a semiarid region of northern Mexico. The potential applications considered are
agriculture, industry, and watering urban green areas. The results indicate that in the best scenario,
the maximal application of treated wastewater is 150 L/s for industrial activities. Besides industrial
applications, this scenario would allow farmers and urban green areas to receive 980 L/s and
70 L/s of treated wastewater respectively. Other issues and alternatives are also identified. With
the implementation of this scenario, it is possible to improve the environmental, and even the
socioeconomic conditions, of the study region.
Keywords: wastewater reuse; groundwater depletion; irrigation of green areas; wastewater

in agriculture
1. Introduction
Water is one of the most important resources for promoting socioeconomic and industrial
development of any society. In arid and semiarid regions, water relevance is even more remarkable
since economic activities can be limited by this resource. For example, the kind of agriculture, animal
husbandry, and industry depends directly on the availability of water. Furthermore, the management
of water is essential at all stages: extraction, distribution, wastewater gathering, treatment and use of
treated wastewater.
The utilization of treated wastewater implies benefits and risks as has been shown in many
studies. These benefits include: reducing both stress on water bodies and pollution of freshwater [1];
decreasing fertilizer need since treated wastewater contains nutrients available for plants [2]; facilitating
conservation and management of freshwater resources, thus increasing the availability of water for
urban use [3] and improving economics since the price of treated water is generally lower than
that of fresh water [4]. On the other hand, different risks have also been identified. In irrigation
applications, it causes accumulation of chemical and biological contaminants in soil, which affects both
physicochemical and microbiological properties of the soil, and subsequently its productivity and
fertility [5,6]; certain persistent pollutants could also enter the food chain through crops irrigated with
treated water [5]. For some industrial applications, tertiary, and even quaternary, treatment processes
should be included, thus increasing the complexity of the treatment systems and their operation [3,7,8].
Sustainability 2019, 11, 2217; doi:10.3390/su11082217 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

Sustainability 2019, 11, 2217 2 of 23
For these reasons, it is important to evaluate the water quality and the potential applications to include
treated wastewater in integral water management strategies.
Nowadays, the use of treated wastewater is an extended practice worldwide, especially in arid
and semiarid countries. Different studies describe experiences, plans, and recommendations for
applications of treated water, considering social, economic, environmental and other factors [8–15]. A
study in South Africa concludes that the factors considered for implementing wastewater reuse are the
distance to transport the water, retrofitted versus new installations, quantity of reuse, pricing, source
quality, public health, willingness, public trust and knowledge, and regulations and guidelines for
reuse [9]. An assessment in the West Bank of the Palestinian territory found that the participation of
farmers in developing guidelines, standards, policies, and plans for agricultural reuse is very important
for the sustainability of treated wastewater reuse [10]. From numerical simulations, based on the
Israel experience of agricultural reuse of treated wastewater, it was determined that the reuse of
treated wastewater has increased the country welfare by 3.3 billion USD; elsewhere, desalination of
treated wastewater is expensive and not optimal since the agricultural benefits do not compensate
the costs [4]. A life cycle assessment was performed by Moretti et al. [16] to study the environmental
impact of reusing treated water in agriculture; the authors found that the treatment process affects the
impact of treated water applications. Then, they propose to include the technology, the replacement of
fertilizers, the effects on water availability and ecosystem quality as factors to redefine regulations
related to reuse of treated wastewater in agriculture. On the other hand, people from Qatar are working
on the implementation of processes to improve treated wastewater quality for applications such as
irrigation, district cooling and domestic purposes [17]. An analysis of the challenges and opportunities
for reusing treated wastewater in Turkey was reported [18]; the authors found that agriculture and
urbanization (including watering of green areas) are some of the main applications in that country, and
that the challenges to overcome are related to social acceptance, lack of framework of guidelines for
safe treated wastewater reuse and human health risks. Besides, China is encouraging wastewater reuse
in its water management strategies [7]; the main identified challenges are focused on increasing the
pace in adopting urban wastewater reuse programs, the establishment of integrated water resources
management framework and guidelines for wastewater reuse programs, redefining water quality
requirements, increasing the market of reclaimed water and the strengthening of public awareness
and cooperation among stakeholders. Also, Garcia and Pargament [19] proposed a methodology to
evaluate the feasibility of reusing treated water in parks irrigation in Yarqon, Israel; they found that
the factors influencing the feasibility are the recreational value of the parks watered by reclaimed
water, the price of treated water, the investment and maintenance cost of the infrastructure, and the
environmental effects of reusing treated wastewater. Finally, the integration of advanced treatment
units such as sand filtration, coagulation and filtration, dissolved air flotation, membrane bio reactor,
micro-filter, reverse osmosis, activated carbon, and ozonation are considered to be essential to reach
industrial requirements for treated wastewater [13,20].
In the case of Mexico, the requirements for treated wastewater and its reuse are regulated by the
national standards NOM-001-ECOL-1996 [21] and NOM-003-ECOL-1997 [22]. The former defines
permissible limits for pollutants for water reuse activities, as well as the characteristics of effluent
discharge into federal water bodies. The latter is dedicated to determining the conditions for wastewater
reuse: criteria for sampling, testing and disposal, parameters for fecal coliform and helminth eggs,
and the maximum permissible limits of chemical and biological pollutants in surface water bodies for
reuse activities. On the other hand, according to the National Water Board (CONAGUA) [23], in 2017
there were 2526 municipal wastewater treatment plants in the country. They treated 135,600 L/s of
wastewater, which corresponds to 63% of the country’s total water recovered from sewage systems.
That year also recorded an estimated reuse rate of 39,800 L/s directly from treatment plants and
78,800 L/s after disposal to a water body [23]. Nevertheless, wastewater is often reused without
treatment in irrigation of crops and some industrial applications and services [24,25]. In recent years,
the reuse of treated wastewater is gaining interest in different regions of the country, especially in
the northern and mainly for agricultural activities [26–29]. But in general, the water infrastructure
does not include reusing systems; in addition, the initiatives to expand the applications of treated
water are still few. These situations imply important challenges which should be addressed in strength
collaboration among government, industrialists, academic and social sectors.
The literature review points out the importance of treated wastewater as a new water source.
Among the challenges and opportunities in the implementation of strategies for reusing treated
wastewater are the selection of applications, the technical and economic feasibility, the social acceptance,
the local regulations and the environmental effects. The contribution of the paper presented here is
related to the application of the methodology since most of the reviewed papers identify the possible
applications of treated wastewater and focuses on one of them, e.g., agriculture, industry, urbanization,
etc. Few studies have addressed the reuse of reclaimed water on simultaneous applications with
a systematic perspective. Thus, the objective of this study is to assess three potential applications
of treated wastewater in a semiarid region (Saltillo-Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, Mexico): agricultural
activities, industrial activities, and irrigation of urban green areas. These applications were selected
based on their environmental, social, and economic relevance for the region. Agriculture has been a
historically important activity, but for some years now, conditions for farmers have become worsened
(e.g., the weather and reduced availability of water); the re-activation of this activity is important from
social and economic viewpoint for the region. Industrial development and promotion require copious
amounts of water. Lastly, urban green areas are an important element for quality of life according to
the World Health Organization (WHO) [30]. Some other non-drinking uses (laundry, cleaning, bathing,
flushing toilets, etc.) are excluded since there is not infrastructure to distribute and reuse treated water
at homes and specific buildings, and implementing it becomes too expensive. An additional aim of the
paper is related to the integration and analysis of information and the assessment of potential scenarios
for wastewater treatment. Since this is the first study related to the potential of wastewater in the
region, it could be used as a guide to take decisions concerning the applications of treated wastewater,
the kind of enterprises to be installed and even the location of new residential developments. In this
context, the analysis presented in the paper is directly related to the compromises of Mexico in the
frame of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [31]. The Goal 6 (ensure availability and
sustainable management of water and sanitation for all) includes as third target “to improve water
quality by reducing pollution eliminating, dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals
and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling
and safe reuse globally”. Then, this work proposes alternatives to contribute to fulfill this target,
specifically in relation to the reuse of treated wastewater. Finally, this study allows the local researches
to select the more relevant topics since the main issues of treated wastewater have been identified.
2. Context of the Studied Region

The studied region is located at the southeast of Coahuila, Mexico, and comprises two
municipalities: Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe (Figure 1). The total landmass is 557,860 ha and includes
about 780,000 inhabitants, most of whom live in urban areas. It is classified as a semiarid region since
the annual precipitation is 370 mm, the annual average maximal temperature is around 38 ◦ C and
some years more than 40 ◦ C have been registered (according to data from the National Meteorological
Service). This is one of the most important industrial regions of the country and it is situated at 60 km
of Monterrey, the third-largest metropolis in Mexico.
In past decades, agriculture was one of the main economic activities on the Saltillo–Ramos
Arizpe region. More than 4000 ha were designated to this activity being vegetables and fodder
the main products. This surface represents 0.72% of the landmass of the study region (557,860 ha)
and is equivalent to ~15% of the urbanized area in accordance with the development program for
this metropolitan area [32]. The water required was provided from a natural stream called Arroyo
La Encantada, which was essential to the social development of the region. Around 1970, urban
wastewater was disposed of in that natural stream without any treatment. Water pollution caused
Sustainability
three main 2019, 11, x FOR PEER
consequences: (i) REVIEW
natural recreational areas were lost, (ii) some species of fish disappeared, 4 of 24
and (iii) CONAGUA forbade the irrigation of vegetables, and agriculture was reduced to growing only
fodder crops
fodder crops (fodder
(fodder oats,oats, fodder
fodder barley,
barley, grass,
grass, sorghum,
sorghum, alfalfa,
alfalfa, forage
forage corn)
corn) and beans; currently,
and beans; currently,
only around 2500 ha are dedicated to agricultural activities. The total surface
only around 2500 ha are dedicated to agricultural activities. The total surface water exploitation water exploitation forfor
agriculture is around 360 L/s [33]. A consequence of the decrease in vegetables
agriculture is around 360 L/s [33]. A consequence of the decrease in vegetables production marked the production marked
the beginning
beginning of a in
of a shift shift in economic
economic activities.
activities. Manufacturing
Manufacturing of clay-based
of clay-based bricks,
bricks, and tilesand
wastiles was a
a relevant
relevant source of employment for people. Presently, this region is the site
source of employment for people. Presently, this region is the site of the most important industrial park of the most important
industrial
in Coahuila park
Statein and
Coahuila
is oneState
of theand is one
most of the mostproficient
economically economically
areasproficient areas inInthe
in the country. country.
agreement
In agreement
with the recordswith of the the recordsInstitute
National of the of National
Statistics,Institute of Statistics,
Geography Geography
and Informatics and Informatics
(INEGI), more than
170 industries are in the study region, consuming around 330 L/s of water [23,34]. Newofenterprises
(INEGI), more than 170 industries are in the study region, consuming around 330 L/s water [23,34].
are
New enterprises are established each year since the local government promotes
established each year since the local government promotes industrial development. This implies the industrial development.
This implies
creation of new theemployment
creation of new employment
opportunities andopportunities and a dynamic
a dynamic economy, economy,
but it is also but itwith
associated is also
an
associated with an increasing population and the subsequent need for more
increasing population and the subsequent need for more services such as energy, water, shopping, and services such as energy,
water, shopping,On
communication. andthe communication. On the to
other side, according other side, according an
the municipalities, to the municipalities,
estimated of 6.6 m2an andestimated
5 m2 of
of 6.6 m 2 and 5 m2 of urban green areas exist per inhabitant in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe, respectively;
urban green areas exist per inhabitant in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe, respectively; however, there is
however,
little there is available
information little information
concerning available concerning
the amount of watertheused
amount of water used for irrigation.
for irrigation.
Figure 1. Geographic location of the study region.

Figure 1. Geographic location of the study region.
According to official data, the renewable water resources (RWR) per capita is 0.032 L/s [26]; even
if thisAccording
value couldto fluctuate over the
official data, the renewable
years, it is representative
water resources of (RWR)
the region.
per Water
capita is
is extracted
0.032 L/s from
[26];
four
even if this value could fluctuate over the years, it is representative of the region. Waterand
aquifers. In agreement with the data provided by the Secretariat of Environment Natural
is extracted
Resources
from four (SEMARNAT), three of these
aquifers. In agreement withaquifers
the data present deficit,
provided by as
theshown in Table
Secretariat of1Environment
[35]. As for RWR,and
this situation characterizes well the condition of the region in this decade.
Natural Resources (SEMARNAT), three of these aquifers present deficit, as shown in Table 1 [35]. As
for RWR, this situation characterizes well the condition of the region in this decade.
Table 1. Water balance of aquifers in the study region.
Aquifer Table
Total1.Recharge
Water balance
(L/s) ofTotal
aquifers in the study
Discharge (L/s) region.
Balance (L/s) Status
AquiferArizpe
Saltillo–Ramos Total2749.24
Recharge (L/s) Total Discharge (L/s) −199.45
2948.69 Balance (L/s) DeficitStatus
Saltillo Sur
Saltillo–Ramos Arizpe 415.40
2749.24 415.40
2948.69 0.00
−199.45 −
Deficit
Derramadero Canyon 570.78 904.68 −333.90 Deficit
Saltillo Sur 415.40 415.40 0.00 −
Zapalinamé 1759.89 2024.99 −265.09 Deficit
Derramadero Canyon 570.78 904.68 −333.90 Deficit
Zapalinamé 1759.89 2024.99 −265.09 Deficit
On the other hand, the region is home to three municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs),
the locations of which
On the other arethe
hand, illustrated
region isinhome
Figure
to 2. Themunicipal
three total installed capacitytreatment
wastewater (1430 L/s)plants
of these WWTPs
(WWTPs),
is
the1200 L/s, 70of
locations L/s, and are
which 160 illustrated
L/s, respectively. The2.Saltillo
in Figure principal
The total plant
installed (SPP)(1430
capacity includes
L/s) aoftertiary system
these WWTPs
based
is 1200onL/s,
reverse osmosis,
70 L/s, and 160 butL/s,
it treats only 20 L/s
respectively. ofSaltillo
The wastewater.
principal plant (SPP) includes a tertiary
system based on reverse osmosis, but it treats only 20 L/s of wastewater.
Sustainability2019,
Sustainability 2019,11,
11,xxFOR
FORPEER
PEERREVIEW
REVIEW 55 of
of 24
24
Figure
Figure2.2. Location
Locationof the wastewater
of the
the wastewatertreatment
wastewater treatment plants:
treatment plants: 11 Planta
plants: PlantaPrincipal
Planta Principal de
Principal de Saltillo
de Saltillo (Saltillo
Saltillo (Saltillo principal
(Saltillo principal
principal
plant-SPP),
plant-SPP), 2 Planta
plant-SPP),22Planta del
Plantadel Gran
delGran Bosque
GranBosque
BosqueUrbano
Urbano
Urbano (big
(big
(big urban
urban
urban forest plant
forest
forest -BUFP),
plant
plant -BUFP),
-BUFP), and
andand3 Planta Municipal
3 Planta
3 Planta Municipal
Municipal de
de
Ramos
de Ramos
Ramos Arizpe
Arizpe (Ramos
Arizpe (Ramos
(Ramos Arizpe municipal
Arizpe
Arizpe municipal
municipal plant-RAMP).
plant-RAMP).
plant-RAMP).
3.3. Methods
3.Methods
Methods
The methodology
The methodology
The methodology used used
used toto perform
to perform this
perform this study
this study was
study was developed
was developed based
developed based
based onon reported
reported works.
on reported The
works. The
works. The
determination
determination of
determination of wastewater
of wastewater quality,
wastewater quality, the
quality, the reuse
the reuse alternatives
reuse alternatives selection,
alternatives selection, the
selection, the social
the social acceptance,
social acceptance,
acceptance, thethe
the
techno-economic
techno-economic feasibility,
feasibility, health
health and
and environmental
environmental effects,
effects, local
local regulation
regulation among
among
techno-economic feasibility, health and environmental effects, local regulation among other factors other
other factors
factors
are usually
are usually
are considered
usually considered
considered in in the
in the strategies
the strategies for
strategies for treated
for treated wastewater
treated wastewater management
wastewater management [4,7,9,10,36].
management [4,7,9,10,36].
[4,7,9,10,36]. MostMost
Most ofof
of
these
these factors
factors were
were taken
taken into
into account
account to
to adapt
adapt reported
reported frameworks
frameworks to
to the
the case
case of
of
these factors were taken into account to adapt reported frameworks to the case of study. A graphicalstudy.
study. A
A graphical
graphical
representation
representation of
representation of the
of the resulting
the resulting proposed
resulting proposed methodology
proposed methodology
methodology isis is divided
divided
divided inin five
in five steps;
steps; itit
five steps; it isis introduced
is introduced
introduced inin
in
Figure 3 and
Figure33and
Figure explained
andexplained below.
explainedbelow.
below.
Figure3.3.Flow
Figure Flow diagram
Flowdiagram ofmethodology
diagramof methodologyused
usedin
inthis
thisstudy.
study.
Step1.1.Wastewater
Step WastewaterProduction
ProductionAnalysis
Analysis
AAwastewater
wastewaterbalance
balanceon
onthe
themunicipal
municipalsewage
sewagesystem
systemwas
wasperformed
performedtotodetermine
determinethe
theproduction
production
and gathering
and gathering of
of wastewater.
wastewater. ItIt was
was assumed
assumed that
that each
each inhabitant
inhabitant uses
uses 0.0021
0.0021 L/s
L/s of
of water
water and
and
produces 0.0018 L/s of wastewater. These values were estimated based on information
produces 0.0018 L/s of wastewater. These values were estimated based on information from the from the
Step 1. Wastewater Production Analysis

A wastewater balance on the municipal sewage system was performed to determine the production
and gathering of wastewater. It was assumed that each inhabitant uses 0.0021 L/s of water and produces
0.0018 L/s of wastewater. These values were estimated based on information from the companies
managing water resources in the study region as well as from an empirical analysis of the social habits
regarding water consumption in the region. Besides, in situ inspections of the municipal sewage
systems were performed in order to determine the water flow in the region.
Step 2. Characterization of Treated Wastewater
The quality of the treated wastewater was determined by physicochemical and microbiological
analyses. The Mexican standards were considered as reference to determine the water quality:
NOM-001-ECOL-1996 [21] and NOM-003-ECOL-1997 [22]. Both standards are based on the guidelines
for using treated wastewater in agriculture developed by the WHO [30]. The methodology and data
obtained were reported previously [37], and the main results are included in Section 4.2 of this paper.
Step 3. Determination of Treated Wastewater Demand
The main applications for treated wastewater, namely agriculture, industrial applications, and
urban green areas, were selected based on the environmental, social, and economic relevance for the
region. Agriculture has been a historically important activity, but for some years now, conditions for
farmers have become worsened. Industrial development and promotion require copious amounts of
water. Lastly, urban green areas are an important element for quality of life according to the WHO [30].
The data used to determine treated wastewater volume required for the three applications were
obtained directly from the potential users. With this objective, six ad-hoc workshops were organized
considering the next general schedule:
• Opening remarks: workshop introduction, description of the motivation, objectives and day
work dynamics.
• Specific lectures: presentation related to the relevance of treated wastewater reuse in the region
by the team leader. Presentation of experiences in the industry, agriculture or urban greening by
invited people.
• Discussion: discussions related to the water requirement status and expressions of interest for
treated wastewater.
• Survey. The assistants completed a survey to identify the current consumption of fresh water
and treated wastewater as well as to know the perspectives for using treated wastewater. The
questionnaire is available as Additional Material.
• Closing remarks.
The workshops were organized as follows:
• One industry workshop. An open invitation for industrialists was issued, and personalized
invitations were sent to the largest industries in the region. This workshop was attended by 17
representatives from industries (responsible of operations and people from the administrative
department) located at Ramos Arizpe, two from municipal authorities and two from the municipal
water managers. The assistance from industries was lower than expected; however, the largest
enterprises in the region were represented. To complement the information, appointments were
arranged by phone and the surveys were sent at that moment by email; this allowed the responsible
to collect the required information. The day of the appointment the survey was completed by a
member of the authors together with the responsible of the industry. The industries for the survey
application were selected based on their size and their main activity.
• Four agriculture workshops. The first workshop was developed by the authors of this paper and
municipal authorities to design the survey and to organize the other events. The second workshop
was a work meeting with commissaries of ejidos (communal lands). The third and four workshops
were mainly destined to the survey application, which has been performed as an interview. The
questionnaire (available as additional material) was answered by 70% of the farmers.
• One urban workshop. Municipal authorities and people from the water management enterprises
were invited. This workshop was attended by two municipal government representative and four
from the management enterprises. All the invited persons were represented in the work journey.
Concerning the application of treated water for urban greening, a virtual analysis using Google
Earth™ software was performed to identify the number and distribution of green areas in Saltillo
and Ramos Arizpe. Also, in situ inspections were conducted to verify the virtual information and
identify the type of vegetation and the status of the green areas. From the obtained information, it
was determined that each hectare of the green areas require 0.9 L/s of water to support vegetation and
maintain adequate living conditions.
Step 4. Scenarios Assessment
Three distribution scenarios were proposed based on the treated wastewater demand. Each
scenario supposes one application as the priority and the other two as secondary necessities. After
that, the idea is to supply first the demand on the priority application. The scenarios are called as
follows. Scenario 1: maximal application on agriculture, Scenario 2: maximal application on industry,
and Scenario 3: maximal application on urban greening. They were assessed by considering economic,
social and environmental factors. Next were the specific criteria to identify the best scenario:
• Coverage of the demand. The larger coverage, the better the scenario. This criterion is selected
since it is supposed that a larger coverage of the demand implies more benefits related to water
availability for the proposed applications.
• Cost of implementation. The lower cost and larger revenues, the better the scenario. The criterion
is associated to the implementation complexity in terms of investment and money recovering
from the sale of treated wastewater. A lower cost was selected since, usually, this increases the
possibility to convince local authorities and stockholders to promote reuse of treated wastewater.
• Environmental protection. The more benefits, the better the scenario. The criterion corresponds to
environmental benefits such as the protection to ecosystems, effect on water bodies, etc.; this is
selected since water has a direct influence on the ecosystems environmental quality.
• Social benefits. The more benefits, the better the scenario. This criterion is selected due to its effect
on life quality for farmers and urban inhabitants.
Step 5. Recommendations
Based on the findings on the previous steps, some key aspects for future works are identified and
some recommendations are presented to motivate wastewater reutilization in the region. An important
remark is that the study presented in this paper was limited to the actions described in the next lines:
• The estimation of the investment for infrastructure. Details about characteristics of the technology,
costs for equipment and operation were not presented in order to ease the analysis and
interpretation of the included information. At the same time, an estimation of the economic and
environmental benefits from the sale of wastewater was performed.
• Some other potential applications of treated wastewater such as purification for drinking, fire
control, car washing, soil compression and non-drinking uses in household activities were not
considered in this study due to the low volume required on the region for these applications and
the missing of infrastructure. However, it was possible to take them into account for future works.
• A specific assessment of the social acceptability was not performed but it was estimated
from surveys applied to farmers and industrialists and from the experience of the water
management enterprises.
4. Results and Discussion

Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 24
4.1. Wastewater Production Analysis
From the water balance whereby 1322 L/s of wastewater was identified, which corresponds to
82% of From
the the water balance
produced amountwhereby
(Figure1322 L/s of
4). The wastewater
other wasthrough
18% is lost identified,
pipewhich corresponds
leakages, to 82%
evaporation,
of the produced amount (Figure 4). The other 18% is lost through pipe leakages,
non-return water and irregular practices. An important remark is that non-treated wastewater evaporation, non-return
water and irregular
represents 30% (400 practices.
L/s) of theAnreturned
important remark
water; thisisisthat
duenon-treated
mainly to wastewater represents
the incompleteness of 30%
the
(400 L/s) of the returned water; this is due mainly to the incompleteness of the
sewage systems and then it is directly discharged on natural streams. This situation induces sewage systems and then
it is directly discharged
environmental and human on natural
health streams.
impacts. This
Due situation induces environmental
to the temperature of the region,andpolluted
human health
water
impacts.
could Due
cause to theproliferation
insect temperatureinducing
of the region,
human polluted waterBesides,
health risks. could cause insectwastewater
untreated proliferation
oninducing
natural
human promotes
streams health risks. Besides, untreated
eutrophication affecting wastewater on natural
aquatic biodiversity, evenstreams promotes eutrophication
at the microorganism level [38].
affecting aquatic biodiversity, even at the microorganism level [38].
Also, wastewater contains potentially harmful pathogens, antibiotic resistant bacteria Also, wastewater
and evencontains
toxic or
potentially disruptive
biologically harmful pathogens,
chemicals,antibiotic
which could resistant bacteriahealth
affect human and even toxic or population,
for exposed biologicallyasdisruptive
reported
chemicals,
in Contreras which could
et al., affect
[39]. humanemerging
Besides, health for pollutants,
exposed population,
such as as reported in Contreras
pharmaceuticals, et al.care
personal [39].
Besides, emerging pollutants, such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products,
products, hormones and others are being detected in urban wastewater; these pollutants increase the hormones and others
are being
risk detected
of diseases [40].in urban wastewater; these pollutants increase the risk of diseases [40].
Figure
Figure4.
4.Water
Waterbalance
balancein
inthe
the study
study region.
region.
On the
On the other
other hand,
hand, municipal
municipal plants plants treat
treat 66%
66% (872
(872 L/s)
L/s) and
and private
private plants
plants treat
treat 4%
4% (50
(50 L/s)
L/s) of
of the
the
returnedwastewater.
returned wastewater.The Thereuse
reuseof oftreated
treatedwater
waterrepresents
represents4.5%
4.5%ofof the
the effluent
effluent from
from the
the municipal
municipal
WWTP. This amount
WWTP. amount is like
like the corresponding
corresponding in in Monterrey
Monterrey (4%)
(4%) and
and notnot too
too far
far from
from thethe one
one ofof
Mexico City (10%). However, in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe, this volume of reuse is
Mexico City (10%). However, in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe, this volume of reuse is low since the region low since the region
is semi-arid
is semi-arid and
and presents
presents water
water scarcity.
scarcity. This
This situation
situation represents
represents important
important opportunities. In In fact,
fact, due
due
tothe
to thetotal
totalinstalled
installedcapacity,
capacity, itit is
is possible
possible to
totreat
treatall
allthe
theproduced
producedwastewater
wastewaterand andthen
thentotoincrease
increasethe the
available volume to supply treated water to different applications as done
available volume to supply treated water to different applications as done in Mexico City. in Mexico City.
4.2. Wastewater
4.2. WastewaterCharacteristics
Characteristics
The parameters
The parameters considered
consideredinin
determining thethe
determining quality of treated
quality wastewater
of treated from the
wastewater threethe
from WWTPs
three
are presented in Table 2. The guidelines proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization
WWTPs are presented in Table 2. The guidelines proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and
by the and
(FAO) United States
by the Environmental
United ProtectionProtection
States Environmental Agency (USEPA)
Agencyare included
(USEPA) arefor comparison
included purposes.
for comparison
purposes.
Elevated conductivity is mainly due to salts and can cause corrosion or encrustation on metallic
surfaces. This affects the operation of industrial and domestic equipment such as boilers, pipelines,
flushing mechanisms, washing machines, and others. In addition, water with high conductivity
could negatively affect vegetal species and even cause the elimination of desirable plants. The SPP
and big urban forest plant (BUFP) produce better treated water than the Ramos Arizpe municipal
plant (RAMP) with respect to conductivity. The value obtained from the RAMP could limit the use
of that treated water for industrial applications [13]. Nevertheless, it is possible to use tertiary
Table 2. Characterization of treated wastewater.
WHO 3
Parameter SPP BUFP RAMP NOM USEPA 5
(FAO) 4
BOD5 (mg/L) 30 6 30 150 1 (20, 30) 2 - 30
TSS (mg/L) 19 4 8 150 1 (20, 30) 2 - 30
pH 7.4–8.0 7.1–8.0 6.3–7.5 (6.5–8) 6.5–8.5
Conductivity (dS/m) 1.724 1.336 2.250 - (0.7–3) 0.7–3
Fecal coliforms (MPN/100 mL) 500 240 200 (240, 1000) 2 1000 200
Helminth eggs (HH/L) 0 0 0 1 1 (1, 5) 2 1 1
Fat and grease <15 <15 10 (15, 15) 2 - -
Nitrogen (mg/L) <40 <40 26.7 40 1 (5–30) 5–30
Phosphorous (mg/L) <20 <20 6.89 20 1 - -
Heavy metals
Arsenic (mg/L) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.2 1 (0.1) 0.1
Cadmium (mg/L) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 1 (0.01) 0.01
Cyanide (mg/L) <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 11 - -
Copper (mg/L) <4 <4 <4 41 (0.2) 0.2
Chromium (mg/L) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 11 (0.1) 0.1
Mercury (mg/L) <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 0.01 1 - -
Nickel (mg/L) <2 <2 <2 21 (0.2) 0.2
Lead (mg/L) <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 1 56 56
Zinc (mg/L) <10 <10 <10 10 1 (2) 2
SPP: Saltillo Principal Plant, BUFP: Big Urban Forest Plant, RAMP: Ramos Arizpe Municipal Plant, NOM: Mexican
Standard, WHO: World Health Organization, FAO: Food and Agriculture Organzation, USEPA: United States
Environmental Protection Agency. 1 NOM-001-ECOL-1996. 2 NOM-003-ECOL-1997 (human direct contact,
human indirect contact). 3 Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture of the
WHO. 4 Wastewater treatment and use in agriculture—FAO. 5 2012 Guidelines for Water Reuse of the USEPA.
6 For irrigation.
Elevated conductivity is mainly due to salts and can cause corrosion or encrustation on metallic
surfaces. This affects the operation of industrial and domestic equipment such as boilers, pipelines,
flushing mechanisms, washing machines, and others. In addition, water with high conductivity
could negatively affect vegetal species and even cause the elimination of desirable plants. The SPP
and big urban forest plant (BUFP) produce better treated water than the Ramos Arizpe municipal
plant (RAMP) with respect to conductivity. The value obtained from the RAMP could limit the
use of that treated water for industrial applications [13]. Nevertheless, it is possible to use tertiary
treatment processes, such as reverse osmosis, stabilization ponds, and membrane bioreactors, among
others [41,42]. Furthermore, it has been reported that for specific industrial processes, some pollutants
could produce positive impacts [43]; freshwater replaced by wastewater (from a process producing
methanol) employing a mass flow exchange technique. This improves the absorption capacity of the
studied system; even if it is a very particular application, the methodology could be adapted to local
conditions in semiarid regions.
Fecal coliform content is one of the main parameters that determines the viability of applying
treated water to water food crops [44–47]. The presence of fecal coliform content does not restrict
industrial applications; however, treated water should have a minimal content. The SPP effluent
does not fulfill the standard for urban greening in applications of direct human contact. But, the
three WWTPs fulfill the official standard of this parameter, which is 1000 MPN/100 mL. Biological
oxygen demand (BOD) is an index of the presence of organic material in the treated water. The official
regulations state that the maximal permissible levels of organic pollutants in treated wastewater used
for public services with indirect human contact must be less than 30 mg BOD/L and 20 mg BOD/L for
direct human contact. As such, for direct contact applications, only the BUFP fulfills the respective
standard. However, the three effluent streams are suitable for agricultural activities and green areas
with indirect contact. Finally, the three WWTPs fulfill the permissible limits for total suspended solids
(TSS). The SPP effluent has 19 mg/L, which could be restrictive for some applications. At present, a
tertiary treatment based on reverse osmosis decreases this parameter to 10 mg/L in the SPP; 20 L/s is
treated in this way, and this volume is sold to an industry located about the SPP.
The treated wastewater fulfills the Mexican standards and most of the WHO, FAO and USEPA
guidelines. Then, it can be deduced that the produced wastewater in the region is feasible to be reused
in several applications such as crops irrigation, green urban watering, laundry, cleaning, water bodies
recharge, household applications and even some industrial processes.
4.3. Identification of Treated Wastewater Demand
4.3.1. Agriculture Sector

From the agriculture workshops, the current situation of agriculture sector was identified directly
from farmers. The main data of agriculture in the region are presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Highlights of the agriculture activities in the study region.
Description Amount Observations

Discharged from SPP and RAMP, untreated
Water flow in La Encantada ~1100 L/s
household wastewater, and industries
Concessions ~360 L/s Surface water exploitation
Land surface >4000 ha Available for agriculture
Used to raise fodder crops (fodder oats, fodder
Active surface ~2500 ha
barley, grass, sorghum, alfalfa, and forage)
Production 5000 ton Crop yield: ~3.6 ton/ha
Production/water yield 0.13 kg/m3 Low production yield
Revenues 660,000 USD Economic yield: 133 USD/ton
Farmers expressed the willingness to integrate
Acceptance of treated wastewater ~70%
an irrigation unit around La Encantada
The water flow in the Arroyo La Encantada was estimated based on measurements at different
points of width and depth of the water source, as well as the superficial speed of water, and
roughness [48]. It is worthwhile to remark that ninety percent of the flow rate is used for agriculture
and farming without any control, leading to low efficiency and productivity. Another important remark
concerns the concessions for surface water exploitation which reach only 11,400,000 m3 /year (~360 L/s);
this volume is less than 20% of the water required for fodder crops in a similar area. Assuming all
the available area was used to grow fodder plants, a water deficit of ~57 Mm3 /year (~1800 L/s) is
estimated. This value exceeds 100% of the wastewater volume generated in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe.
That means agricultural activities could easily utilize the entire effluent volume released by the three
municipal WWTPs.
On the other hand, the low production yield could be due to the low efficiency of watering
techniques and large leakages in the water conduction system owing to unlined canals. Besides, the
economic yield is directly associated to the kind of crops. The farmers expressed their willingness
to raise crops with higher value which could increase revenues. It is worth mentioning that in other
regions of Mexico and other areas around the world that experience similar weather, the production
yields of fodder crops such as alfalfa, fodder oats, and fodder flower exceed 12 ton/ha [49–55]. As such,
the results of the current study shed light on the need to improve the treated wastewater distribution
system that supplies water to agricultural areas and to use better irrigation techniques. Implementing
these actions would help increase the production yield. If the product/surface relationship reaches
10 ton/ha, the fodder production of the Ramos Arizpe region could rise to 13,730 ton, with a global
value of almost thrice the current production.
4.3.2. Industrial Sector

The main industrial parks (marked with letters symbols in Figure 5) are located north of the
Ramos Arizpe urban area as well as south of Saltillo in the Derramadero Industrial Park (A in Figure 5).
The main industries are related to metals and mechanized activities (car assembly, automotive parts
manufacturing, and steel mills), refractory and cement production, fertilizer production, pharmaceutical
production, and paper recycling to produce diapers and sanitary towels. From the discussion developed
in the industry
Sustainability workshop,
2019, 11, the
x FOR PEER following information was generated.
REVIEW 12 of 24
Figure
Figure 5.
5. Location
Location of
of main industrial parks.
Transporting the treated

Table 4. water to Derramadero
Information requires a large
about water consumption investment as the water needs
by industries.
to be pumped for around 35 km and the land is placed at a slope of 500 m. On the other hand, the
Enterprise Water Consumption L/s Industrial Use % Potential Use of Treated Water L/s
geographic position of the SPP allows the treated water to be conveyed by gravity to the industrial
E1 49.15 98 44.39
parks situated in Ramos Arizpe. Therefore, at present time, the reuse of treated water is only feasible
E2 47.56 100 47.56
on industries located at Ramos Arizpe.
E3 14.27 76 1.52
A representative result of the survey to industries is presented in Table 4. The water consumption
E4 4.44 80 0
column corresponds to the whole volume received for each enterprise. The industrial use column
E5 2.53 80 2.06
contains the water percentage which is used in manufacturing processes; the zero entries imply all the
E6 1.24 5 0
received water is for human use inside the enterprise (cleaning, cooking, drinking, toilet, etc.). The last
E7 0.63 0 0
column indicates the volume of treated wastewater that each company would be willing to buy for
E8 0.38 95 0.38
industrial use.
E9 0.28 2 0.28
E10 0.05 0 0
E11 0.05 0 0.00
E12 0.03 0 0
E13 0.01 95 0
TOTAL 120.60 96.19
The required water for industrial use (processes operation) for enterprises E1–E3 is more than
90% of the total water consumption. This corresponds to a potential use of ~95 L/s of treated water.
The other enterprises should use no more than 2 L/s of treated water. These numbers could be
attributed to the fact that most of the installed industries operate “dry processes.” However, the
acceptance of treated wastewater as source of water by industrialists was identified from the surveys
Table 4. Information about water consumption by industries.
Enterprise Water Consumption L/s Industrial Use % Potential Use of Treated Water L/s
E1 49.15 98 44.39
E2 47.56 100 47.56
E3 14.27 76 1.52
E4 4.44 80 0
E5 2.53 80 2.06
E6 1.24 5 0
E7 0.63 0 0
E8 0.38 95 0.38
E9 0.28 2 0.28
E10 0.05 0 0
E11 0.05 0 0.00
E12 0.03 0 0
E13 0.01 95 0
TOTAL 120.60 96.19
The required water for industrial use (processes operation) for enterprises E1–E3 is more than 90%
of the total water consumption. This corresponds to a potential use of ~95 L/s of treated water. The
other enterprises should use no more than 2 L/s of treated water. These numbers could be attributed
to the fact that most of the installed industries operate “dry processes”. However, the acceptance
of treated wastewater as source of water by industrialists was identified from the surveys and the
workshop. Currently, the steel mill DeAcero Ramos Arizpe, which is located close to the SPP, uses
20 L/s of treated water. It is expected that new installations in this industry will use 40 L/s of treated
water from the RAMP, which is ~2 km away. Another potential user of treated water is Kimberly
Clark, which could demand 45 L/s. Moreover, considering a mean consumption of 0.5 L/s by the other
enterprises, the total requirement of treated wastewater for industrial applications is not greater than
150 L/s. This represents 17% of the current production of treated water by the SPP and RAMP.
4.3.3. Urban Greening

The World Health Organization recommends at least 10 m2 of green area per urban inhabitant [56].
Therefore, the water required for this application increases as a direct function of population increase.
Moreover, in regions with low precipitation (as is this case for this study) the water assigned for green
area management could be as high as that for human consumption. Before 2008, the water used in
green areas was extracted from water wells and was of high quality since it fulfilled the standard for
human consumption. In addition, drinking water from the municipal distribution network was used
for watering some recreational parks. This practice is now being discouraged but remains active despite
the disadvantages related to price and drinking water availability. Since 2008, when the municipal
WWTPs started operations, the treated water from the BUFP has been used to water the green areas
located northeast of Saltillo. The distribution is performed by gravity through an exclusive pipeline
network. Also, some tanker trucks are used to transport treated water to places situated outside the
distribution system coverage. Due to its localization, this treatment plant is better situated than the
other two for irrigation of green areas in Saltillo.
The results of the virtual analysis (example shown in Figure 6) and in situ inspections indicate
that there are 582 ha of green areas in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe (deficit of ~270 ha in accordance with
the WHO); it was observed that most of the green areas do not receive enough water.
an exclusive pipeline network. Also, some tanker trucks are used to transport treated water to places
situated outside the distribution system coverage. Due to its localization, this treatment plant is
better situated than the other two for irrigation of green areas in Saltillo.
The results of the virtual analysis (example shown in Figure 6) and in situ inspections indicate
that there are
Sustainability 2019,582 ha of green areas in Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe (deficit of ~270 ha in accordance
11, 2217 13 of 23
with the WHO); it was observed that most of the green areas do not receive enough water.
(a) (b)
Figure 6. Virtual
Virtual analysis of green areas in Saltillo (a) and Ramos Arizpe (b).
According totoinformation
informationprovided
providedby by
municipal
municipalauthorities in theinurban
authorities the workshop, the volume
urban workshop, the
required to manage the green areas is estimated at 0.9 L/s·ha; this is due to the weather in the
volume required to manage the green areas is estimated at 0.9 L/s∙ha; this is due to the weather in the region
and theand
region existing vegetation.
the existing A resume
vegetation. of this situation
A resume is included
of this situation in Tablein5.Table 5.
is included
Table 5.
Table Highlights of
5. Highlights of the
the urban
urban greening
greening in
in the
the study
study region.
region.
Description
Description Amount
Amount Observations
Observations
Current
Current volumefor
volume forgreen
green areas
areas 20 20
L/sL/s From the BUFP,
From the BUFP, being
being28%
28%ofofits
its capacity
capacity
Greenareas
Green areas 582582
haha In both
In both Saltillo
Saltillo andRamos
and RamosArizpe
Arizpe
Volume
Volume requiredfor
required forcurrent
current situation
situation 524524
L/sL/s Considering0.9
Considering 0.9L/s∙ha
L/s·ha
Recommended green areas >776.22 ha At least 102m2 of green area per urban inhabitant
Recommended green areas >776.22 ha At least 10 m of green area per urban inhabitant
Volume for recommended situation 765 L/s Considering 0.9 L/s·ha and 850 ha
Volume for recommended
Acceptance situation
of treated wastewater 765 L/s
Moderate Considering
Acceptance 0.9contact
for indirect L/s∙haand
andnon-drinking
850 ha uses
Acceptance of treated wastewater Moderate Acceptance for indirect contact and non-drinking uses
From in
From in situ
situ inspections, it was
inspections, it was noted
noted that
that the
the vegetation
vegetation in
in green
green areas
areas is
is not
not suitable for the
suitable for the
region since it requires a considerable amount of water; also, green areas are underwatered.
region since it requires a considerable amount of water; also, green areas are underwatered. Local Local
adapted or
adapted or endemic
endemicvegetation
vegetationshould
shouldbebeused
usedsince they
since areare
they resistant to large
resistant weather
to large variations
weather and
variations
able to rise with little water. In order to fulfill the WHO recommendations, the authorities expressed in
the workshop the need to increase the surface for green areas and the intention to reach 850 ha. The
water required for irrigation of this surface is 765 L/s; this represents 56% of the produced wastewater
and 88% of the treated volume.
4.4. Assessment of Scenarios

Based on the identified demand and current use of treated wastewater, three distribution scenarios
were considered. The scenarios ponder one application as priority and allow meeting the current use
of treated water on the other two applications. For the assessment of scenarios, an estimation of the
investment to implement them is included. This estimation was done considering the information
provided by municipal authorities (responsible for water management in the region); this includes the
current prices for the corresponding services in the region. Detailed costs of equipment and operation
under the requirements are not presented here in order to simplify the analysis and interpretation.
To do a qualitative comparison, some reported works from other places focusing on the priority
application are considered.
4.4.1. Scenario 1: Maximal Application to Agriculture

In this scenario, the use of treated water in industry remains equal as currently: 20 L/s; then,
additional actions or investments are not required for this application since the distribution system
is installed and operating. It is worthwhile to mention that the treated water is sold and generates
revenues of ~170,000 USD. On the other hand, since the BUFP is far away from the agriculture zone,
this scenario considers the whole effluent from BUFP (70 L/s) to be applied for the watering of green
urban areas. Presently, only 17 L/s is used for this application; the actual distribution system would
have to be extended in order to use the whole treated volume. Distribution with tanker trucks is
currently done. However, it seems to be expensive, inefficient, and even negative for the environment:
the trucks receive little maintenance, large volume of water is lost in the distribution, they use fossil
fuels and then usually produce a large amount of CO2 emissions. Finally, the other 1100 L/s should be
destined to farmers. At present time, there are 35 km of unlined distribution canals to carry the water
to the communal farms.
Thus, Table 6 shows the distribution of wastewater for this scenario and the corresponding
estimation of investment that is required to implement it. The first challenge to taking advantage
of the treated wastewater for this scenario is the improvement of the distribution system. Sediment
must be removed from the existing canals, and in some cases, the canals must be rebuilt. The second
challenge concerns the economical aspect. The required investment could be provided by the federal
organizations in charge of the agricultural sector in cooperation with local farmers, as well as local
authorities. Since the owner of the treated water is the municipal government and because it is used
on the watering of public green areas, it is not possible to estimate revenues. These two challenges
agree with related studies in other places; the conditions for transport treated water, the kind of crops,
the amount of water to be assigned and public policies are important topics. To overcome them, a
serious collaboration among the involved sectors is required, which is one of the strategies detected in
other studies [9,10].
Table 6. Treated wastewater distribution for scenario 1: maximal reuse for agriculture.
Priority Secondary Supply (L/s) Demand (L/s) Investment (USD) Some Related Studies
Agriculture 1100 1100 670,000
Urban 70 765 1,000,000 Middle Eastern, North [10],
Industry 20 150 – and South Africa [9]
Total 1200 2015 1,670,000
The third challenge is related to the irrigation and culture techniques. The farmers are used to
the current irrigation practices, and it is difficult to persuade them to change their work habits. To
overcome this situation, it is advisable to implement some techniques such as drip irrigation and
improved aspersion. Then it would be feasible to raise crops with higher value, such as vegetables and
fruits. Based on related studies [1,2,4,7,16,57,58] and on the characteristics of the study region (distance
between treatment plants and agriculture zone, quality of water, deficit of green areas and scarcity of
water), several benefits are expected from this scenario:
• Since more and better-quality water is sent to the Arroyo La Encantada, the ecosystems near this
natural stream to could be recovered, such as has been done in other regions.
• The farmers could raise more valuable products and then they could improve their life quality.
• The use of treated water for irrigation of green areas allows decreasing the extraction of drinking
water from water wells.
4.4.2. Scenario 2: Maximal Application for the Industrial Sector

The priority application in this scenario is the industrial sector; after achieving the requirements
from enterprises (150 L/s), the other two applications could be attended according to treated water
availability and distribution feasibility.
As for the previous scenario, the BUFP is not suitable for distribution to industries; for this reason,
the total effluent from this plant (70 L/s) is considered for urban greening. It implies the investment
also remains similar. Then, the volume of treated water destined for agriculture could be 980 L/s,
which represents almost 90% of the volume considered in scenario 1 for this application; however,
the corresponding investment remains similar since the maintenance of canals is required. Table 7
illustrates the respective distribution of treated wastewater.
Table 7. Treated wastewater distribution in scenario 2: maximal reuse in industries.
Priority Secondary Supply (L/s) Demand (L/s) Investment (USD) Related Studies
Industry 150 150 9,500,000
Agriculture 980 1100 670,000 Iran [13] Spain [8],
Urban 70 765 1,000,000 Jordan [14], Qatar [17]
Total 1200 2015 11,170,000
Kimberly Clark is the main potential customer of treated water, since they expressed the intention
to use 45 L/s. There are two options to providing this volume: (i) from the SPP, and (ii) from the
RAMP. The first alternative produces water with high quality but requires the construction of a pipeline
system 14 km long. An advantage of this choice is that some other users could be supplied from the
same pipeline. The second option requires a 5 km pipeline; however, the treated water has a high
concentration of solids and could require a tertiary treatment, thus influencing the final price. The
second big customer is the new building of the DeAcero steel mill which is 1.6 km from the RAMP.
This enterprise and the local authorities have signed an agreement to provide 40 L/s of treated water to
the steel mill. The enterprise is responsible for the construction of the distribution lines; the signed
agreement stipulates that after some years the infrastructure will be given to the municipality.
It is important to remark that the quality of treated wastewater for industries depends on the
kind of processes where the water is applied; in some cases, high quality is required and then, tertiary
treatments should be implemented [8,13,20]. The big industries operating in the study region requires
tertiary treatment due to conductivity and even fecal coliforms content. However, most of industries
use dry processes; then, the treated water could be used for other applications. Then, it is important to
investigate particular specifications and tropicalize either methods or technology. Besides, even if the
main industrial application of treated water in Mexico City is cooling, this is a good example for the
study region; in addition, the sold of treated water represent good revenues in Monterrey, therefore, it
is advisable to adapt its methodology which includes low price and fiscal benefits.
A challenge identified for this scenario is to persuade enterprises to use treated water and to
consolidate the ones which expressed their interest in the industry workshop. This could be done if
the government states directives for the industrial sector related to the need to reuse the treated water.
Besides, scenario 2 includes the environmental and social benefits identified for the first scenario;
besides, economic advantages are forecasted: the treated water can be sold to enterprises, which
implies revenues for the municipalities. It is worth mentioning that the price of the treated water
should be comparable to the current cost of the water used by the enterprise, which is estimated as
~0.50 USD/m3 . Furthermore, an additional environmental benefit is identified: the wastewater used
by industries could be interchanged by groundwater. Then it is possible to stop the extraction of
more than 3 Mm3 /year from the aquifers. This would be an interesting contribution to mitigating the
overexploitation of the aquifers of the region, specifically for the Saltillo–Ramos Arizpe aquifer.
4.4.3. Scenario 3: Maximal Application for Urban Greening

Green area watering is the priority in this scenario and the other two applications are considered
secondary. On the other hand, the current volume (20 L/s) destined for industry remains similar in this
scenario; then, additional actions or investments are not required. Therefore, the amount of treated
water available for agriculture is 415 L/s, which corresponds to 38% of the demand in this application.
This volume is very low and could cause negative effects to the lifestyle of farmers. Besides, the
corresponding investment remains similar as for the previous scenarios since the improvement of
the distribution systems is strictly necessary for an efficient transportation even of this volume. The
distribution of treated water and the estimated investment for this scenario is presented in Table 8.
Table 8. Treated wastewater distribution for scenario 3: maximal reuse in green areas.
Priority Secondary Supply (L/s) Demand (L/s) Investment (USD) Some Related Studies
Urban 765 765 11,000,000
Agriculture 415 1100 670,000 Turkey [18], Israel [19],
Industry 20 150 – China [7]
Total 1200 2015 11,670,000
This scenario presents more relevant challenges: (a) the geographic position of the three WWTP is
not well situated for an efficient distribution of treated water to urban areas; then, it is necessary to
implement a distribution strategy including pipelines and even tanker trucks, (b) the treated water
quality of the RAMP is not suitable for this application, advanced treatment should be implemented
to reach a good water quality, (c) the implementation of new distribution pipelines could require
long time and cause lot of disturbances on the cities circulation, and (d) maybe the most limiting
challenge is the required investment, which is very high. These challenges agree the reported in related
studies [7,15,18,19]. Besides, if all the produced wastewater was collected, the WWTP would be close
to its maximal operation condition. Also, the population is expected to increase by 250,000 people over
the next 10 years; this implies a wastewater increase of 400 L/s, which exceeds the current treatment
capacity. In addition, the enlargement of green areas should be a direct consequence of the increase of
population, according to WHO recommendations [30]. With this perspective, the construction of new
treatment plants would be required to fulfill the official standards to watering green areas. The total
capacity of those WWTP should be at least 300 L/s and should be distributed to reach all the urban
green areas. On the other hand, the main benefits of this scenario are social and environmental. The life
quality could be improved since green areas are recreational areas and help to regulate temperature on
the cities. Moreover, the use of treated water for watering green areas allows decreasing the extraction
of water from wells.
4.4.4. Comparison of Scenarios

Based on the previous analysis, a comparison of the three considered scenarios is included in
this section (Table 9). From this comparison, it is concluded that the second scenario is the most
adequate. The demand from the three applications is quite satisfactory: even if the watering of green
areas is limited, it is possible to increase the current volume for this application. On the other side,
considering the distribution for the other two applications, it is possible to re-activate agricultural
activities, increasing the farmer revenues, recover the ecosystem near the Arroyo La Encantada, and to
provide wastewater for the potential demand of the industrial sector.
4.5. Environmental Assessment of the Maximal Application on Industrial Sector

The environmental performance of the second scenario is assessed by using the Battelle-Columbus
method [59–61]. This technique was developed to evaluate water resource planning projects; it is
based on a hierarchical arrangement of environmental quality indicators. The major level is composed
of four categories: ecology, environmental pollution, esthetics and human interest. Each category
considers different environmental components and each component includes several environmental
parameters. These parameters are associated to specific characteristics of the studied project, such as
land use, water quality, diversity of vegetation types, employment opportunities, etc.; then, they are
expressed in different measurement units. In addition, they have a specific level of importance which is
determined by a parameter importance unit (PIU). It is worthwhile to mention that the optimal quality
of a studied environment counts 1000 units. The environmental quality index (EQI) is introduced as
a transformation system in order to obtain homogeneous units for all parameters. These new units
are called environmental impact units (EIU) and allow global evaluation to be possible. The EIUs
are computed for the situation with and without the project implementation; the difference between
the two scores represents the environmental change produced by the project, and the amplitude of
this change allows generating a flag which indicate how fragile or strong the respective parameter
is [60]. Next is a description of the methodology: (i) to obtain the EQI with and without the project
implementation by using a transformation function, (ii) to compute the EIU with and without the
project implementation as follows: EIU = EQI × PIU; after that, the net change is obtained as: change =
(EIUwith − EIUwithout )/(EIUwithout ), (iii) to assign a flag for each parameter. Concerning the Ecology
category, a major flag is assigned if 0 < |change| and a minor flag is assigned if 5|change| < 10. For the
other categories, a major flag is assigned if 30 < |change|, and a minor flag is assigned if 30 > |change|.
Table 9. Scenarios comparison.
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Agriculture: XXX Agriculture: XX Agriculture: X
Treated water
distribution Industry: XX Industry: XXX Industry: X
Green areas: X Green areas: X Green areas: XXX
Highest investment: ~11.7 M
Investment: ~1.7 M USD. Investment: ~11 M USD.
USD.
Economic aspects Low revenues: ~0.17 M USD. Better revenues: ~1.9 M USD. Low revenues: ~0.17 M USD.
Low revenues for Counties stop paying for the
Treated water could be sold.
the counties. extraction of water for irrigation.
Social acceptance for
Farmers acceptance for
non-drinking uses and indirect
using treated wastewater
human contact applications
All the identified for scenario 1
Social aspects More availability of fresh Acceptance of industrialists for Better life quality in
water then less health risks using treated wastewater urbanizations for green areas
Farmers life quality
Life quality of farmers
improved due to better
few improved
conditions for agriculture
Moisture in La Encantada is Moisture in La Encantada is
Improvement of actual
adequate to maintain adequate to maintain
green areas.
ecosystems within 60 km. ecosystems within 60 km.
Environmental
aspects The regional aquifers are The regional aquifers are
Increase of green urban areas.
recharged. recharged.
Extraction of groundwater is Water extraction from wells Water extraction from wells
still required. diminishes. diminishes.
Implementation of efficient All the identified for
irrigation techniques. scenario 1.
Study of advanced Design of logistics for
Study of optimal crops.
treatment systems. distribution of treated water.
Opportunities Study of optimal species for
Assessment of ecosystem
Identification of processes for green areas.
near the Arroyo La
application of treated water. Design of new treatment plants.
Encantada.
Identification of optimal Design of profiles for new
species for green areas. industries.
Improvement of municipal sewage systems, Improvement infrastructure for wastewater reuse,
Main challenges
Access to funds to implement wastewater reuse projects
The environmental evaluation of the maximal application of wastewater on the industrial sector is
presented on Table 10. To ease the assessment, nine environmental parameters were selected from the
four categories as follows. Ecology: crops; environmental pollution: basins hydrologic loss and land
use; aesthetics: water appearance, wild animals and variety within vegetation types; human interest:
recreation spaces, landscape. It is considered that these parameters are representative of the studied
environment. The transformation functions used to obtain the EQIs were taken from reference [60]. The
PIUs where determined based on the ones used by the Battelle Columbus method [59]; proportional
coefficients where used according to the number of parameters on each category.
Table 10. Environmental assessment.
EQI EIU Evaluation

Parameters Without With PIU Without With Change Flag
Crops 0.8 0.9 240 192 216 12.5 Major
Basins hydrologic loss 0.9 0.95 370 333 351.5 6 Minor
Land use 1 0.8 32 32 25.6 −20 Minor
Water appearance 0.6 0.9 105 63 94.5 50 Major
Wild animals 0.5 0.8 24 12 19.2 60 Major
Variety within vegetation types 0.6 0.7 24 14.4 16.8 17 Minor
Recreation spaces 0.2 0.6 51 10.2 30.6 200 Major
Landscape 0.2 0.6 51 10.2 30.6 200 Major
Employment opportunities 0.7 0.8 103 72.1 82.4 14 Minor
Total 1000 738.9 867.2
Only the land use presents a negative impact, this is mainly due to the enhancing of the current
distribution system and the construction of new ones. The other parameters receive positive impacts.
Major impact is observed on water appearance, wild animals, recreation spaces and landscape; this is
a direct effect of the recovering of the ecosystem on the shore of the Arroyo La Encantada. Related
to crops, even if the environmental quality is improved only in 0.1 EQI, the global impact is major
since this parameter corresponds to the ecology category; in addition, this impact is related to the
improvement of the watering and the kind of crops which should be used. The minor impacts are
related to basins hydrologic loss, variety within vegetation types and employment opportunities.
The first one is the effect of stopping the extraction of water from aquifers as a consequence of the
reutilization of treated wastewater. The second one is related to the recovery of ecosystem on the shore
of the Arroyo La Encantada. The third one corresponds to the employment of people on the agriculture
activities. On the other side, the environmental quality without the project (the current situation)
is 738.9 EIU, meanwhile the maximal application of wastewater on industrial activities allows the
environmental quality to be improved in 128.3 EUI, around 13%.
4.6. Recommendations for the Future Use of Wastewater

From the previous analysis, some recommendations related to the main challenges to implement a
complete strategy for the systematic use of wastewater in the study region considering the distribution
proposed in scenario 2 are proposed:
(a) Improvement and supervision of municipal sewage systems:
Since the main reasons of the water lost are identified (pipeline leakages, incomplete sewage net
and irregular practices), the water return could be increased by implementing the next strategies:
• The municipal sewage systems must be updated to enlarge the coverage of wastewater gathering.
In addition, discharge of wastewater to the Arroyo La Encantada and irregular practices must
be avoided.
• Stricter supervision of the sewage system is required; an alternative is to develop a system based
on telemetry including the logistic of supervision and the data acquisition as done for other
applications [62–64].
• With these actions, the SPP and BUFP should reach 100% of their capacity, and the RAMP 70%.
This allows a higher availability of treated wastewater and then a diversification of applications.
(b) Infrastructure for treated wastewater reuse:

• Monterrey owns a treated wastewater distribution 210 km long to carry 360 L/s (4%) and Mexico
City distributes more than 3700 L/s (~10%) for reuse. Meanwhile, Saltillo and Ramos Arizpe
reuse 40 L/s; even if the proportion (4.5%) is like the one in Monterrey and not too far from the
corresponding to Mexico City, the volume is low since the region has water scarcity: wastewater
should be better used.
• An important issue is the lack of infrastructure. Currently, the BUFP has a distribution system for
treated water ~15 km long and the SPP a system 1 km long which is especially used for a steel mill.
Even if tanker trucks are also employed, the distributed volume by this way is low and inefficient.
Thus, extension of the distribution systems requires to be done.
• The authorities should take advantage of the interest of Kimberly Clark to reuse treated water;
this enterprise is the furthest from the SPP in Monterrey direction. Therefore, a pipeline from the
SPP could distribute enough treated water to supply the industrial demand in north of Saltillo
and Ramos Arizpe. On the other hand, infrastructure for the distribution of wastewater to the
agricultural region must be also updated. As aforementioned, several unlined canals require
maintenance and even re-construction. Since this kind of distribution is inefficient, better canals
should be implemented.
• The BUFP is better situated for reusing on municipal green areas; therefore, the distribution
pipeline should be extended. Also, future treatment plants should be implemented based on reuse
of treated wastewater.
(c) Sector collaboration and social involvement:
• Regional collaborations are recommended in other places around the world. The involved parties
(municipal authorities, federal organisms, nongovernmental organizations, users) should be well
coordinated to solve issues in the different stages of the implementation of strategies for the use of
treated wastewater.
• The distribution system for industrial use could be developed in collaboration between the
municipalities and the interested enterprises. In fact, there is already an accord to build a pipeline
from the RAMP to a steel mill; this could be used as a basis to develop additional projects. The
enterprises in the Ramos Arizpe industrial parks could provide most of the funds; consequently,
they should receive water at low price and fiscal benefits.
• The required investment to carry treated water to agricultural lands could be provided by federal
organizations. According to the Mexican compromises regarding the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development, federal programs are being developed in order to promote cleaner production,
including agriculture and ecosystems conservation. Besides, the current development program of
Coahuila state includes the ecosystem conservation and the water conservation. Therefore, projects
to reuse treated water on agriculture are susceptible to receive funds and even technical support.
In addition, local farmers have expressed willingness to cooperate at least with workforce.
• The funds to complement the distribution of wastewater from the BUFP could be provided by
federal organizations or private entrepreneurs; the amortization could be charged to municipal
authorities and the final users (people and property developers). In addition, CONAGUA offers
funds for projects related to implementation of wastewater treatment plants and reuse of water.
The study region could apply for this kind of program.
• Following the directives of the 2030 Agenda and the Development Program, it is advisable to
create new laws to promote the integration of wastewater treatment process in the new buildings;
the treated water could be employed to water green areas and even used in other applications in
the same building or in other close areas. Also, regulations to allow farmers to raise more valuable
crops are required.
• On the other hand, the region is home of universities and research centers with experience in
the management of natural resources. These institutions could provide their expertise to several
activities such as evaluation of crops, irrigation techniques, study of species for green areas,
evaluation of tertiary systems for wastewater treatment, identification of industrial applications

of treated water, sustainability assessment and some others.
• Finally, social involvement is also required. People could be involved in supervision of sewage
systems, distribution of wastewater and green areas. In this sense, communication programs to
raise awareness on people concerning water relevance in the region are also an important aspect.
5. Conclusions
From the integration of information, it was determined that the study region municipal WWTP
treats 872 L/s of waste water which corresponds to 66% of the identified wastewater. By improving
the wastewater gathering, it is possible to offer 1100 L/s for different applications. The quality of the
treated wastewater is suitable for different applications, which could be an alternative to the scarcity of
water in the region. From the assessment of scenarios, it was found that the best distribution of treated
water is: 150 L/s for industries, 980 L/s for agricultural activities and 70 L/s for watering green areas.
The main benefits associated to this distribution are: (a) 120 L/s of fresh water could be replaced
by treated water, reducing aquifer exploitation, (b) it promotes the re-activation of agriculture and
the ecosystems near the Arroyo La Encantada may be preserved, (c) it promotes the application of
larger volumes of treated water to green areas. On the other hand, the more relevant issues to be
overcome are: (a) improvement of municipal sewage systems and of the infrastructure for reusing
wastewater, (b) implementing a strategy to get investment from national organisms, (c) ensuring
regional collaboration including municipal and federal governments, industrialists, academic and
social sectors. Even if the surveys and workshops allowed us to partially identify the social acceptance
of reuse of treated water in the region, an assessment specially focused on social acceptability is
required. Also, among the future research on this field should be oriented to: (i) identify emergent
pollutants in wastewater, (ii) determine specific industrial applications to develop methods to reach
the required quality of treated wastewater, (iii) evaluate the resistance of local species as elements on
green urban areas, (iv) determine the best crops for the new conditions of agriculture sector.
Author Contributions: A.V.R. and E.N.A.G. developed the technical and economic analysis as well as the
integration of information. G.T.E. and L.S.M. conceived and applied the survey to farmers in order to obtain
and analyze the information concerning the agriculture sector; in collaboration with A.V.R. they performed the
generation of the information concerning urban greening. L.D.J. and S.C.H. conceived and applied the survey to
industries and analyzed the obtained information; also, they wrote the paper.
Funding: This research was funded by Coahuila State Council for Science and Technology (COECYT Coahuila)
through project 149646.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Vergine, P.; Salerno, C.; Libutti, A.; Beneduce, L.; Gatta, G.; Berardi, G.; Pollice, A. Closing the water cycle in
the agro-industrial sector by reusing treated wastewater for irrigation. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 164, 587–596.
[CrossRef]
2. Trat, A.K.; Schwabe, K.A.; Jassby, D. Wastewater reuse for agriculture: Development of a Regional Water
Reuse decision-support Model (RWRM) for cost-effective irrigation sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50,
9390–9399. [CrossRef]
3. De Gisi, S.; Casella, P.; Cellamare, C.M.; Ferraris, M.; Petta, L.; Notarnicola, M. Wastewater reuse. Encycl.
Sustain. Technol. 2017, 53–68. [CrossRef]
4. Reznik, A.; Feinerman, E.; Finkelshtain, I.; Fisher, F.; Huber-Lee, A.; Joyce, B.; Kan, I. Economic implications
of agricultural reuse of treated wastewater in Israel: A statewide long-term perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2017,
222–233. [CrossRef]
5. Becerra-Castro, C.; Lopes, A.R.; Vaz-Moreira, I.; Silva, E.F.; Manaia, C.M.; Nunes, O.C. Wastewater reuse
in irrigation: A microbiological perspective on implications in soil fertility and human and environmental
health. Environ. Int. 2015, 75, 117–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Elgallal, M.; Fletcher, l.; Evans, B. Assessment of potential risks associated with chemicals in wastewater
used for irrigation in arid and semiarid zones: A review. Agric. Water Manag. 2016, 177, 419–431. [CrossRef]
7. Lyu, S.; Chen, W.; Zhang, W.; Fan, Y.; Jiao, W. Wastewater reclamation and reuse in China: Opportunities
and challenges. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 39, 86–96. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Pintilie, P.; Torres, C.M.; Teodosiu, C.; Castells, F. Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: An
LCA case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 1–14. [CrossRef]
9. Adewumi, J.R.; Ilemobade, A.A.; Van Zyl, J.E. Treated wastewater reuse in South Africa: Overview, potential
and challenges. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 55, 221–231. [CrossRef]
10. Mizyed, N.R. Challenges to treated wastewater reuse in arid and semi-arid areas. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013,
25, 186–195. [CrossRef]
11. Kalavrouziotis, I.K.; Apostolopoulos, C.A. An integrated environmental plan for the reuse of treated
wastewater effluents from WWTP in urban areas. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 1862–1868. [CrossRef]
12. Hophmayer-Tokich, S.; Kliot, N. Inter-municipal cooperation for wastewater treatment: Case studies from
Israel. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 86, 554–565. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Piadeh, F.; Moghaddam, M.R.A.; Mardan, S. Present situation of wastewater treatment in the Iranian
industrial states: Recycle and reuse as a solution for achieving goals of eco-industrial parks. Resour. Conserv.
Recycl. 2014, 92, 172–178. [CrossRef]
14. Ammary, B.Y. Wastewater reuse in Jordan: Present status and future plans. Desalination 2007, 211, 164–176.
[CrossRef]
15. Chu, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Fu, P. Wastewater reuse potential analysis: Implications for China’s water
resources management. Water Res. 2004, 38, 2746–2756. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Moreti, M.; Van Passel, S.; Camposoe, S.; Pedrero, F.; Dogot, T.; Lebailly, P.; Vivaldi, G.A. Modelling
environmental impacts of treated municipal wastewater reuse for tree crops irrigation in the Mediterranean
coastal region. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 660, 1513–1521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Jasim, S.Y.; Saththasivam, J.; Loganathan, K.; Ogunbiyi, O.O.; Sarp, S. Reuse of Treated Sewage Effluent (TSE)
in Qatar. J. Water Process Eng. 2016, 11, 174–182. [CrossRef]
18. Maryam, B.; Büyükgüngör, H. Wastewater reclamation and reuse trends in Turkey: Opportunities and
challenges. J. Water Process Eng. 2017. [CrossRef]
19. Garcia, X.; Pargament, D. Reusing wastewater to cope with water scarcity: Economic, social and environmental
considerations for decision-making. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2015, 101, 154–166. [CrossRef]
20. Šrámková, M.V.; Diaz-Sosa, V.; Wanner, J. Experimental verification of tertiary treatment process in achieving
effluent quality required by wastewater reuse standards. J. Water Process Eng. 2018, 22, 41–45. [CrossRef]
21. Norma Oficial Mexicana. NOM-001-ECOL-1996 Límites Máximos Permisibles de Contaminantes en las Descargas
de Aguas Residuales en y Bienes Nacionales; Diario Oficial de la Federación: Mexico City, Mexico, 1996.
22. Norma Oficial Mexicana. NOM-003-ECOL-1997 Límites Máximos Permisibles de Contaminantes para las
Aguas Residuales Tratadas que se Reúsen en Servicios al Público; Diario Oficial de la Federación: Mexico City,
Mexico, 1997.
23. CONAGUA. Statistics on Water in Mexico. 2018. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/conagua/acciones-y-
programas/publicaciones-estadisticas-y-geograficas-60692 (accessed on 7 March 2019).
24. Jiménez-Cisneros, B. 2012 Guidelines for the Water Reuse. Available online: https://www3.epa.gov/region1/
npdes/merrimackstation/pdfs/ar/AR-1530.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
25. López-Morales, C.A.; Rodríguez-Tapia, L. On the economic analysis of wastewater treatment and reuse for
designing strategies for water sustainability: Lessons from the Mexico Valley Basin. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
2019, 140, 1–12. [CrossRef]
26. Escalante, V.; Cardoso, L.; Ramírez, E.; Moeller, G.; Mantilla, G.; Montecillos, J.; Servín, C.; Villavicencio, F. El
Reuso del Agua Residual Tratada en México. Available online: www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/agua2003/reus.
pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
27. Romero, M.S.; Salazar, L.E.; Viau, E.; Peccia, J.; Mendoza, L.; Ruvalcaba, G.; Figueroa, M. Contaminación
y Medio Ambiente en Baja California. 2006. Available online: https://books.google.com.mx/books?isbn=
9707018593 (accessed on 7 March 2019).
28. Lencioni, V.; Carranza, C.; Vega, A.; Vega, H. Water Reuse in Mexico. Mexico Water Report. 2011. Available
online: http://www.lgaconsulting.com/water/IE-MexicoWaterReport-2011Winter-WaterReuseInMexico.html
(accessed on 7 March 2019).
29. Cohen, A.; Mamane, H.; Lester, Y. Reutilizacion de Aguas Residuales en México: Caso Sonora. 2015. Available
online: http://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con5_uibd.nsf/EACED48F3063BA6D05258234005FDCE1/
$FILE/13.REUTILIZACIÓN-AR-SON.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
30. WHO. Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Grey Water. 2006. Available online:
http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241546859_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 7 March 2019).
31. ONU. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online:
sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 11 April 2019).
32. CONAGUA. Programa Contra Contingencias Hidráulicas para la Zona Urbana de Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila.
2016. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/281365/ZONA_URBANA_
RAMOS_ARIZPE__COAH.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
33. CONAGUA. Consulta a la Base de Datos del REPDA. 2019. Available online: https://app.conagua.gob.mx/
Repda.aspx (accessed on 7 March 2019).
34. INEGI. 2019. Available online: https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/manufacturasexp/default.html#Herramientas
(accessed on 7 March 2019).
35. SEMARNAT. 2015. Available online: http://www.sema.gob.mx/SRN/SIIAEC/POETE/CUADROS/Cuadro_
41_Disponibilidad_media_anual.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
36. Akhoundi, A.; Nazif, S. Sustainability assessment of wastewater reuse alternatives using the evidential
reasoning approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 195, 1350–1376. [CrossRef]
37. Aguilera-González, E.N.; Valdés-Ramos, A.; Tobón-Echeverri, G.; Carlos-Hernández, S.; Samaniego-Moreno, L.;
Alvarez-Garza, M.A.; Díaz-Jiménez, L. Analysis of the Production and Treatment of Wastewater in the Southeast
of Coahuila, Mexico. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2015, 4, 155–162. [CrossRef]
38. Martines Santos, M.; Lanzén, A.; Unda-Calvo, J.; Martín, I.; Garbisu, C.; Ruiz-Romera, E. Treated and
untreated wastewater effluents alter river sediment bacterial communities involved in nitrogen and sulphur
cycling. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 1051–1061. [CrossRef]
39. Contreras, J.D.; Meza, R.; Siebe, C.; Rodríguez-Dozal, S.; López-Vidal, Y.A.; Castillo-Rojas, G.; Amieva, R.I.;
Solano-Gálvez, S.G.; Mazari-Hiriart, M.; Silva-Magaña, M.A.; et al. Health risks from exposure to untreated
wastewater used for irrigation in the Mezquital Valley, Mexico: A 25-year update. Water Res. 2017, 123,
40. Williams, M.; Kookana, R.S.; Mehta, A.; Yadav, S.K.; Tailor, B.L.; Maheshwari, B. Emerging contaminants in a
river receiving untreated wastewater from an Indian urban centre. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 647, 1256–1265.
[CrossRef]
41. Boeriu, L.M.; Cirstolovean, I.L.; Fratu, M.; Nastac, C. The tertiary treatment stage of wastewater. Bull. Transilv.
Univ. Braşov. 2013, 6, 207–212. Available online: http://aspeckt.unitbv.ro/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1594/1/
01%20boieriu.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
42. Huang, L.Y.; Lee, D.J. Membrane bioreactor: A mini review on recent R&D works. Biores. Technol. 2015, 194,
43. Kovac Kralj, A. The re-usage of wastewater within industry: The positive impacts of contaminants. J. Clean.
Prod. 2015, 95, 124–130. [CrossRef]
44. Cooper, R.C. The hygienic aspects of wastewater reuse. Waste Manag. Res. 1991, 9, 373–377. [CrossRef]
45. Liberti, L.; Notarnicola, M.; Petruzzelli, D. Advance treatment for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture.
UV disinfection: Parasite removal and by-product formation. Desalination 2002, 152, 315–324. [CrossRef]
46. Mutengu, S.; Hoko, Z.; Makoni, F.S. An assessment of the public health hazard potential of wastewater reuse
for crop production. A case of Bulawayo city, Zimbabwe. Phys. Chem. Earth 2007, 32, 1195–1203. [CrossRef]
47. Al-Jassim, N.; Ansari, M.I.; Harb, M.; Hong, P.-Y. Removal of bacterial contaminants and antibiotic resistance
genes by conventional wastewater treatment processes in Saudi Arabia: Is the treated wastewater safe to
reuse for agricultural irrigation? Water Res. 2015, 73, 277–290. [CrossRef]
48. Ruiz Morales, B. Valor de la Producción de las Actividades Agrícola-Ganaderas Realizadas con Aguas
Residuales Tratadas en Comunidades Ejidales y Pequeñas Propiedades del Municipio de Ramos Arizpe,
Coahuila. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Autónoma Antonio Narro, Coah, Mexico, 2013. Available online:
http://repositorio.uaaan.mx:8080/handle/123456789/5333 (accessed on 7 March 2019).
49. Sáenz Forero, R. Reuso de Aguas Residuales pre-Tratadas en Agricultura y Piscicultura. 1986. Available
online: www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/scan2/017891/017891.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
50. Moscoso, J. Aspectos Técnicos de la Agricultura con Aguas Residuales. 1995. Available online: www.bvsde.
ops-oms.org/bvsair/e/repindex/repi84/vleh/fulltext/acrobat/moscoso.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
51. Zamora Guajardo, R. Utilización de Aguas Negras en el Cultivo de Triticale (X. Triticosecale Wittmack), Variedad
AN-57 para la Producción de Forraje, Utilizando como Testigo Agua Normal. Master’s Thesis, Universidad
Autónoma Antonio Narro, Coah, Mexico, 1998. Available online: http://repositorio.uaaan.mx:8080/xmlui/
handle/123456789/1/browse?value=ZAMORA+GUAJARDO%2C+RAMON&type=author (accessed on 7
March 2019).
52. Cisneros Estrada, O.X.; Gonzalez Meraz, J.; Fuentes Ruiz, C. Perspectiva de Aprovechamiento de las Aguas
Residuales en la Agricultura. 2001. Available online: http://cenca.imta.mx/pdf/43978Pri.pdf (accessed on 7
March 2019).
53. Murillo Amador, B.; Escobar, A.; Fraga Mancillas, H.; Pargas Lara, R. Rendimiento de grano y forraje de
líneas de triticale y centeno en Baja California Sur, México. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2001, 24, 145–153. Available
online: https://www.revistafitotecniamexicana.org/documentos/24-2/3r.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
54. Plevich, J.O.; Delgado, A.R.S.; Saroff, C.; Tarico, J.C.; Crespi, R.J.; Barotto, O.M. El cultivo de alfalfa utilizando
agua de perforación, agua residual urbana y precipitaciones. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient 2012, 16,
1353–1358. [CrossRef]
55. Montemayor Trejo, J.A.; Woo Reza, J.L.; Munguía López, J.; Román López, A.; Segura Castruita, M.A.; Yescas
Coronado, P.; Frías Ramírez, E. Producción de alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivada con riego sub-superficial
y diferentes niveles de fósforo. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agric. 2012, 3, 1321–1332. Available online: http://www.
scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342012000700003&lng=es&nrm=iso (accessed on
7 March 2019).
56. Grandjean, A.C. Water Requirements, Impinging Factors, and Recommended Intakes. Available online:
www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/nutrientschap3.pdf (accessed on 7 March 2019).
57. Kumar, D.; Hiremath, A.M.; Asolekar, S.R. Integrated management of wastewater through Sewage Fed
Aquaculture for Resource Recovery and Reuse of Treated Effluent: A case study. International Conference
on Environmental Science and Development. APCBEE Procedia 2014, 10, 74–78. [CrossRef]
58. Rodenas, M.A.; Albacete, M. The River Segura: Reclaimed water, recovered river. J. Water. Reuse Desal. 2014,
4, 50–57. [CrossRef]
59. Dee, N.; Baker, J.; Drobny, N.; Duke, K.; Whitman, I.; Fahringer, D. An environmental evaluation system for
water resource planning. Water Resour. Res. 1973, 9, 523–535. [CrossRef]
60. Conesa Fernández-Vítora, V. Methodological Guide for the Environmental Impact Assessment, 4th ed.; Ediciones
Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 2003; pp. 253–300. (In Spanish)
61. Wagh, C.H.; Gujar, M.G. The environmental impact assessment by using the Battelle Method. Int. J. Sci. Res.
2014, 3, 82–86.
62. Colomina, I.; Molina, P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS
J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 92, 79–97. [CrossRef]
63. Gago, J.; Douthe, C.; Coopman, R.E.; Gallego, P.P.; Ribas-Carbo, M.; Flexas, J.; Escalona, J.; Medrano, H. UAVs
challenge to assess water stress for sustainable agriculture. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 153, 9–19. [CrossRef]
64. Aries Rokhmana, C. The potential of UAV-based remote sensing for supporting precision agriculture in
Indonesia. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 24, 245–253. [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Potential Uses of Treated Municipal Wastewater in A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Potential Uses of Treated Municipal Wastewater in A

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Potential Uses of Treated Municipal Wastewater in A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

sustainability

Keywords: wastewater reuse; groundwater depletion; irrigation of green areas; wastewater

Sustainability 2019, 11, 2217; doi:10.3390/su11082217 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

2. Context of the Studied Region

Figure 1. Geographic location of the study region.

Step 1. Wastewater Production Analysis

The workshops were organized as follows:

4. Results and Discussion

Table 2. Characterization of treated wastewater.

4.3. Identification of Treated Wastewater Demand

4.3.1. Agriculture Sector

Table 3. Highlights of the agriculture activities in the study region.

Description Amount Observations

4.3.2. Industrial Sector

Transporting the treated

Table 4. Information about water consumption by industries.

4.3.3. Urban Greening

4.4. Assessment of Scenarios

4.4.1. Scenario 1: Maximal Application to Agriculture

4.4.2. Scenario 2: Maximal Application for the Industrial Sector

Table 7. Treated wastewater distribution in scenario 2: maximal reuse in industries.

4.4.3. Scenario 3: Maximal Application for Urban Greening

4.4.4. Comparison of Scenarios

4.5. Environmental Assessment of the Maximal Application on Industrial Sector

Table 9. Scenarios comparison.

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Table 10. Environmental assessment.

EQI EIU Evaluation

4.6. Recommendations for the Future Use of Wastewater

(b) Infrastructure for treated wastewater reuse:

(c) Sector collaboration and social involvement:

evaluation of tertiary systems for wastewater treatment, identification of industrial applications

You might also like