Rev JALSI 99365 Rek
Rev JALSI 99365 Rek
Rev JALSI 99365 Rek
This journal’s peer review policy states that NO manuscript should be rejected only on the basis of ‘lack of Novelty’, provided the manuscript is scientifically robust and technically sound.
To know the complete guideline for Peer Review process, reviewers are requested to visit this link:
(https://journaljabb.com/index.php/JABB/editorial-policy )
6. Are the references sufficient and recent? If you have suggestion of Should be added
additional references, please mention in the review form.
Research article should not be this much lengthy, Especially Result part need to give more
(Apart from above mentioned 6 points, reviewers are free to provide concern, Author suggested to keep some valuable point except make it like essay
additional suggestions/comments)
Optional/General comments
PART 2:
Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct the manuscript and highlight that part
in the manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write his/her feedback here)
(If yes, Kindly please write down the ethical issues here in details)
Are there ethical issues in this manuscript?
Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)
Review Form 1.7
Reviewer Details:
Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)