Rev JALSI 99365 Rek

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Review Form 1.

Journal Name: Journal of Applied Life Sciences International


Manuscript Number: Ms_JALSI_99365
Title of the Manuscript:
SPATIAL RHYTHM AND PERIODIC PATTERN OF FISH SPECIES IN ENIONG RIVER, SOUTH EASTERN NIGERIA

Type of the Article

General guideline for Peer Review process:

This journal’s peer review policy states that NO manuscript should be rejected only on the basis of ‘lack of Novelty’, provided the manuscript is scientifically robust and technically sound.
To know the complete guideline for Peer Review process, reviewers are requested to visit this link:

(https://journaljabb.com/index.php/JABB/editorial-policy )

PART 1: Review Comments

Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct


the manuscript and highlight that part in the
manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write
his/her feedback here)
Compulsory REVISION comments

1. Is the manuscript important for scientific community? It may be


(Please write few sentences on this manuscript)
No
2. Is the title of the article suitable?
(If not please suggest an alternative title)
Yes But title and manuscript totally differ ,inside of the manuscript its showing fish diversity
3. Is the abstract of the article comprehensive? and variability in particular River

4. Are subsections and structure of the manuscript appropriate? Yes

5. Do you think the manuscript is scientifically correct? Its more lengthy

6. Are the references sufficient and recent? If you have suggestion of Should be added
additional references, please mention in the review form.
Research article should not be this much lengthy, Especially Result part need to give more
(Apart from above mentioned 6 points, reviewers are free to provide concern, Author suggested to keep some valuable point except make it like essay
additional suggestions/comments)

Minor REVISION comments

1. Is language/English quality of the article suitable for scholarly


communications?

Optional/General comments

PART 2:

Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct the manuscript and highlight that part
in the manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write his/her feedback here)
(If yes, Kindly please write down the ethical issues here in details)
Are there ethical issues in this manuscript?

Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)
Review Form 1.7

Reviewer Details:

Name: Rekha Rani


Department, University & Country Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, India

Created by: DR Checked by: PM Approved by: MBM Version: 1.7 (15-12-2022)

You might also like