Iso 7919 3 2009
Iso 7919 3 2009
Iso 7919 3 2009
STANDARD 7919-3
Second edition
2009-02-01
ISO 7919-3:2009
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/09137193-4651-4c57-b31c-
8eb7edb6b853/iso-7919-3-2009
Reference number
ISO 7919-3:2009(E)
© ISO 2009
ISO 7919-3:2009(E)
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but
shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In
downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat
accepts no liability in this area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation
parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In
the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 7919-3 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 108, Mechanical vibration, shock and condition
monitoring, Subcommittee SC 2, Measurement and evaluation of mechanical vibration and shock as applied
to machines, vehicles and structures.
iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 7919-3:1996), of which it constitutes a minor
(standards.iteh.ai)
revision. It also incorporates the Technical Corrigendum ISO 7919-3:1996/Cor.1:2007.
⎯ Part 2: Land-based steam turbines and generators in excess of 50 MW with normal operating speeds of
1 500 r/min, 1 800 r/min, 3 000 r/min and 3 600 r/min
Introduction
This part of ISO 7919 specifies guidelines for measuring transverse shaft vibration on coupled industrial
machines. Evaluation criteria, based on previous experience, are given for use as guidelines for assessing the
vibratory conditions of such machines.
A general description of the principles that are generally applicable for the measurement and evaluation of
shaft vibration of non-reciprocating machines is outlined in ISO 7919-1.
1 Scope
This part of ISO 7919 gives guidelines for applying evaluation criteria of shaft vibration under normal operating
conditions, measured at or close to the bearings of coupled industrial machines. These guidelines are
presented in terms of both steady running vibration and any amplitude changes which can occur in these
steady values. The numerical values specified are not intended to serve as the only basis for vibration
evaluation since, in general, the vibratory condition of a machine is assessed by consideration of both the
shaft vibration and the associated structural vibration.
⎯ turbofans,
The information relating to pumps provided in this part of ISO 7919 complements that given in
ISO 10816-7. In particular, the conditions for in-situ operation, performing acceptance tests and the
influence of bearing clearance given in ISO 10816-7 shall be taken into account when evaluating the
shaft vibration of pumps
This part of ISO 7919 is neither applicable to land-based steam turbine-generator sets for power stations with
outputs greater than 50 MW (see ISO 7919-2), nor machine sets in hydraulic power generating and pumping
plants with outputs of 1 MW or greater (see ISO 7919-5).
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 7919-1, Mechanical vibration of non-reciprocating machines — Measurements on rotating shafts and
evaluation criteria — Part 1: General guidelines
3 Measurement procedures
The measurement procedures to be followed and the instrumentation which shall be used are specified in
ISO 7919-1.
In industrial machines, shaft vibration relative to the bearing is normally measured. Therefore, unless stated
otherwise, this part of ISO 7919 always refers to relative vibration displacement. In view of the relatively high
rotational speeds involved with industrial machines, measuring methods using non-contacting transducers are
most common and are generally preferred on rotor elements with operating speeds of 3 000 r/min and above.
For monitoring purposes the measuring system shall be capable of covering overall vibration up to a
frequency equivalent to 2,5 times the maximum service speed. However, it should be noted that for diagnostic
purposes it might be desirable to cover a wider frequency range.
4 Evaluation criteria
The criteria for vibration magnitude, changes in vibration magnitude and operational limits are given in
Annex A.
The vibration magnitude is the higher value of the peak-to-peak displacement measured in two selected
orthogonal measurement directions. The values presented are the result of experience with machinery of this
type and, if due regard is paid to them, acceptable operation can be expected. If only one measuring direction
is used, care should be taken to ensure that it provides adequate information (see ISO 7919-1).
The criteria are presented for the specified steady-state operating conditions at the rated speed and load
iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW
ranges. They apply for normal slow changes in load but do not apply when different conditions exist or during
transient changes, for example during start-up and shut-down and when passing through resonance ranges.
(standards.iteh.ai)
In these cases alternative criteria are necessary.
It should be noted that overall judgement of the vibratory state of a machine is often made on the basis of both
ISO 7919-3:2009
shaft relative vibration ashttps://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/09137193-4651-4c57-b31c-
defined above and of measurements made on non-rotating parts (see
ISO 10816-3)[2]. 8eb7edb6b853/iso-7919-3-2009
Annex A
(normative)
A.1 General
Two evaluation criteria are used to assess the relative shaft vibration of coupled industrial machines,
measured at or close to the bearings. One criterion considers the magnitude of the observed broad-band
relative shaft vibration; the second considers changes in magnitude, irrespective of whether they are increases
or decreases.
Caution should be exercised when using the criteria presented in Annex A to ensure that no contact occurs
between the rotating shaft and stationary parts. Therefore, in certain cases the shaft displacement limits given
in this part of ISO 7919 may exceed the available clearance. In such cases the evaluation zone limits should
be adjusted accordingly.
The following typical evaluation zones are defined to permit a qualitative assessment of the shaft vibration of a
given machine and to provide guidelines on possible actions.
Zone A: The vibration of newly commissioned machines normally falls within this zone.
Zone B: Machines with vibration within this zone are normally considered acceptable for unrestricted long-
term operation.
Zone C: Machines with vibration within this zone are normally considered unsatisfactory for long-term
continuous operation. Generally, the machine may be operated for a limited period in this condition until a
suitable opportunity arises for remedial action.
Zone D: Vibration values within this zone are normally considered to be of sufficient severity to cause damage
to the machine.
In accordance with present accumulated experience of shaft vibration measurements in this field, the
recommended values for the zone boundaries are inversely proportional to the square root of the maximum
operating speed of the shaft, n (in revolutions per minute). The recommended values illustrated in Figure A.1
are derived from Equation (A.1), Equation (A.2) and Equation (A.3):
These values are not intended to serve as acceptance specifications, which shall be subject to agreement
between the machine manufacturer and the customer. However, they provide guidelines for ensuring that
gross deficiencies or unrealistic requirements are avoided.
iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW
(standards.iteh.ai)
In certain cases, there can be specific features associated with a particular machine, which would require
different zone boundary values (lower or higher) to be used. For example, with a tilting pad bearing it might be
necessary to specify alternative vibration values, whilst in the case of an elliptical bearing different vibration
criteria can apply for the directions of maximum and ISOminimum
7919-3:2009 bearing clearance. In particular, it should be
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/09137193-4651-4c57-b31c-
recognized that the allowable vibration can be related to the journal diameter since, generally, running
clearances will be greater for larger diameter 8eb7edb6b853/iso-7919-3-2009
bearings. Consequently different values can apply for
measurements taken at different bearings on the same rotor line. In such cases, it is normally necessary to
explain the reasons for this and, in particular, to confirm that the machine will not be endangered by operating
with higher vibration values.
Higher values of vibration can be permitted at other measuring positions and under transient conditions, such
as start-up and run-down (including passage through critical speed ranges).
The reference value for this criterion is the typical, reproducible normal vibration, known from previous
measurements for the specific operating conditions. If this reference value changes by a significant amount,
and certainly if it exceeds 25 % of the upper limit value for zone B, regardless of whether this increases or
decreases the magnitude of vibration, steps should be taken to ascertain the reasons for the change. A
decision on what action can be taken, if any, should then be made after consideration of the maximum value
of vibration and whether the machine has stabilized at a new condition.
When Criterion II is applied, the vibration measurements being compared shall be taken at the same
transducer location and orientation, and under approximately the same machine operating conditions.
It is necessary to appreciate that a criterion based on change of vibration has limited application, since
significant changes of varying magnitude and rates can and do occur in individual frequency components, but
the importance of these is not necessarily reflected in the broad-band vibration signal (see ISO 7919-1). For
example, the propagation of a crack in a rotor can introduce a progressive change in vibration components at
multiples of rotational frequency, but their magnitude might be small relative to the amplitude of the once-per-
revolution rotational frequency component. Consequently, it can be difficult to identify the effects of the crack
propagation by looking at the change in the broad-band vibration only. Therefore, although monitoring the
change in broad-band vibration will give some indication of potential problems, it might be necessary in certain
applications to use measuring and analysis equipment which is capable of determining the trends of the vector
changes that occur in individual frequency components of the vibration signal. This equipment can be more
sophisticated than that used for normal supervisory monitoring and its use and application requires specialist
knowledge. Hence, the specification of detailed criteria for measurements of this type is beyond the scope of
this part of ISO 7919.
ALARMS: To provide a warning that a defined value of vibration has been reached or a significant change
has occurred, at which remedial action may be necessary. In general, if an ALARM situation occurs, operation
can continue for a period whilst investigations are carried out to identify the reason for the change in vibration
and define any remedial action.
iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW
TRIPS: To specify the magnitude of vibration beyond which further operation of the machine may cause
(standards.iteh.ai)
damage. If the TRIP limit is exceeded, immediate action should be taken to reduce the vibration or the
machine should be shut down.
ISO 7919-3:2009
Different operationalhttps://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/09137193-4651-4c57-b31c-
limits, reflecting differences in dynamic loading and support stiffness, may be specified
for different measurement positions and directions.
8eb7edb6b853/iso-7919-3-2009
The ALARM limits may vary considerably for individual machines. The values chosen will normally be set
relative to a baseline value determined from experience for the measurement position or direction for that
particular machine.
It is recommended that the ALARM limit be set higher than the baseline by an amount equal to 25 % of the
zone boundary B/C. If the baseline is low, the ALARM may be below zone C.
Where there is no established baseline (for example, with a new machine) the initial ALARM setting should be
based either on experience with other similar machines or relative to agreed acceptance values. After a period
of time, the steady-state baseline value will be established and the ALARM setting should be adjusted
accordingly.
If the steady-state baseline changes (for example, after a machine overhaul), the ALARM setting should be
revised accordingly. Different operational ALARM settings may then exist for different bearings on the
machine, reflecting differences in dynamic loading and bearing support stiffnesses.
The TRIP limits will generally relate to the mechanical integrity of the machine and be dependent on any
specific design features which have been introduced to enable the machine to withstand abnormal dynamic
forces. The values used will, therefore, generally be the same for all machines of similar design and would not
normally be related to the steady-state baseline value used for setting ALARMS.