Christian Apologetic Paper
Christian Apologetic Paper
Christian Apologetic Paper
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Apologetic Science PhD Candidates Submitted to the Management of East African Polytechnic College
Kyambogo for the Award of A Doctoral Professional Dipolma in Apologetic Science
1
Dr. Naloka Baker Frederick
2
Dr. Kitaka Eric
3
Kibalama Johnsion (Professor)
4
Dr. Olwol Jasper
5
Kafuko Martin
6
Arinaitwe Isaac
7
Murungi Keneth
East African Polytechnic College Kyambogo
Sign………………………………………………………………….
Date: …………30-09-2023……………………………………
I am thankful to all those persons who provided me important information and gave me valuable advice. I will be happy if
you read this proposal carefully and thoroughly.
I have tried to complete this assignment meaningfully and correctly, as much as possible.
However, if you need any assistance in interpreting this assignment, please contact me without hesitation.
Signature…………………………………………………..
Date……………………………30-09-2023…………….
Unto my parents, who saw the best in me, one who turned many door handles to get me into a place that could support and
sponsor my education.
Unto my wonderful wife and children that have at times missed out on being with me, and have had to put up with me when
I was stressing with deadlines.
Signature……………………………………………..Date……01-11-2023…
Sign………………………Date………01-11-2023…
Mr Sseguya John
Academic Registrar
Sign……………………………………………………. Date…01-11-23…
Sign……………………………….Date………20-11-2023…………………
As a result, while the word apologia has roots in ancient Greek culture, the art and science of apologetics as we know it
today may be as old as man. In the face of an increasingly secular society, a new answer to the Bible's adversaries is required.
The purpose of this Paper is to equip Christians to "confront the Bible's critics and respond to all of the major challenges to
the inspiration and authority of Scripture."
This Christian Apologetics Paper is a comprehensive resource designed to empower and excite believers by offering facts to
defend and explain their faith. This paper examines nearly every key issue, person, and concept related to Christian apologetics,
clearly explaining various philosophical systems and concepts, examining contemporary issues and challenges, and providing
classic apologetic arguments, all with the goal of providing readers with the background to discuss their Christian faith with
skeptics intelligently, confidently, and persuasively.
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 2784
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: .................................................................................................... 2784
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 2784
PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN THIS RESEARCH......................................................................... 2784
DEFINITION ....................................................................................................................................... 2784
CHAPTER TWO ..................................................................................................................................... 2786
WHAT EXACTLY IS AN APOLOGIST?.................................................................................................. 2786
Theological Accountability. .................................................................................................................. 2792
Research Methodology
The study used literature review mainly from textbooks, interment and research papers.
Definition
The science of defending the Christian faith is known as apologetics. Apologetics is about fighting the good fight of faith;
laying hold on eternal life- the knowledge of the One and Only True God and Jesus Christ- and rejecting all other forms of lies,
trickeries and cunning deceptions of the devil perpetrated through human agents, the ultimate goal being, the destruction of human
lives". Apologetics is about simultaneously standing for the truth on one hand, and against falsehood, on the other.
Apologetics is the task of developing and sharing arguments for the truth and rationality of Christianity and the falsehood
and irrationality of alternatives with the aim of strengthening the faith of believers and provoking nonbelievers to consider Christ.
Probably the key verses for Christian apologetics are: (Jude 3 and 1 Peter 3:15) which admonishes us to be prepared always
to give an answer for the hope we have and to contend for the Christian religion.
Every Christian should be able to present his or her faith in Christ in a fair manner. Not every Christian needs to be an
apologetics expert, but he or she should understand what they believe, why they believe it, how to share it with others, and how to
defend it against lies and attacks.
The second half of 1 Peter 3:15, "but do this with gentleness and respect..." is another aspect of Christian apologetics that is
frequently overlooked. Using apologetics to defend the Christian faith should never require being unpleasant, angry, or
disrespectful; instead, we should endeavor to be forceful in our argument while still being Christ-like in our presentation.
Simply put, it is the rational solution to the objections raised against Christianity. And there have been many dissenters
during the last 2,000 years. So, if you prefer a reasoned reaction to a frustrated folding of the arms and reluctance to engage,
apologetics has something for you.
The first, known as classical apologetics, entails exchanging proofs and evidences that the Christian message is true.
The second style of apologetics, dubbed "presuppositional" apologetics, involves addressing the presuppositions
(preconceived concepts, assumptions) that drive anti-Christian arguments. Proponents of the two Christian apologetic systems
regularly disagree about which strategy is more effective. Using both tactics looks to be much more productive, depending on the
individual and scenario.
Types of Apologetics
Many reactions and arguments develop as a result of diverse persons with different origins and preconceived beliefs about
Christianity posing different challenges and inquiries. Certain people have mastered a variety of argument methods.
Christian apologetics is an essential component of the Christian life. (1 Peter 3:15). We are all instructed to be ready and
equipped to proclaim the gospel and defend our faith. That is what Christian apologetics is all about.
Apologetics, as opposed to Polemics, is concerned with defending the Christian faith against critics both within and outside
the faith, whereas Polemics is concerned with identifying mistakes in people's beliefs. Both have something to do with the
intellectual defense of belief systems. Apologetics is frequently used as a sort of pre-evangelism to answer reasonable doubts
Apologetics is not about winning arguments, but about pointing people to Christ and the Gospel and respond to the criticisms
leveled at it.
Apologetics is classified into two or more types: biblical and historical. This style seeks to establish the Bible's
trustworthiness, canon, and claims with textual and historical evidence. To provide clarity and evidence for the Bible's historical
reality, this method investigates archaeological sites, the age and authenticity of original materials, and occasionally apparent
inconsistencies in the Bible.
Within this Larger Area, Apologists Look into the following Topics:
Jesus' miracles
The fulfillment of Old Testament predictions by Jesus
Historical proof for contentious Old Testament events
The reliability of first-hand accounts of Christ's life.
Moral and philosophical arguments are other second significant types of apologetics. Moral arguments investigate the ethical
implications of God's existence. They look at whether man is intrinsically good or evil, and how the Bible answers moral
quandaries. Philosophical debates address the larger questions of whether God exists and, if so, what kind of God exists.
The other third significant type of apologetics is scientific apologetics. This type typically addresses scientific issues brought
by the Bible. Is the Creation story true? Is there scientific evidence of a global flood? Is the Bible capable of answering scientific
questions? Christian scientists are presently investigating some of these issues. Another line of argument exposes weaknesses in
evolution, Darwinism, and the scientific and academic communities' core belief that God plays no role in science. While there are
many minor sub-categories of apologetic reasoning, these are the most comprehensive and extensively employed.
The apostle Paul was a skilled apologist. In Thessalonica, he "went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he
reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Messiah had to suffer and rise from the dead" (Acts 17:2-
3).
Paul was soon at Athens, where he met with Greek philosophers at the Areopagus (Acts 17:22-24). He also defended the
gospel in front of monarchs, putting pressure on them to respond (Acts 26:26-28). Paul also provided intellectual justification for
faith in Acts 17:1-3, 19:8-10, 26:26-28, and 18:27-28).
There are two types of Christian apologists: Researchers and Instructors. Apologists are among the researchers who are
continually looking for innovative ways to respond to mounting religion challenges. They are currently developing new
arguments. Their work includes knowing how to speak at the highest levels of academia, combining research from peer-reviewed
journals, and carefully integrating the Christian worldview. Because their background needs a rare blend of intellectual
knowledge, this type of Apologist is uncommon. Apologists Researchers are more likely to produce resources that are useful and
ideal for sharing with an unbeliever. In this area, we have the following books in our research tray:
Understanding Christian Foundations, Mortality And Destiny After Death, Principles of Bible Interpretation, Generation
Curses, and other topics.
The second kind of apologist is what I refer to as an educator. These Apologists rephrase the study content for laypeople or
students. They are exceptional communicators who can explain complex concepts to a wide audience. This category includes
many well-known apologists on the speaking circuit.
Apologists who are educators generally make a name for themselves because of their exceptional communication abilities to
a wider audience.
These are often the people that thrive on the apologetics speaking circuit. Their talks are ideal for sharing with students or
those who are fresh to the apologetics debate. However, they may not have the highest academic credentials, therefore they should
proceed with caution when sharing materials from Researchers with nonbelievers.
The bottom line is to know your audience. Choose something from a researcher if you want to present a resource to an
unbeliever or a Christian who is looking for more nuanced answers. Hiring an educator with good public speaking skills is often
desirable if you're trying to introduce apologetics to a youth group or a mom's group that has no prior knowledge of the subject.
Apologists must understand the Bible and Christian theology. Some well-known Christian apologists include Norman
Geisler, Josh McDowell, William Lane Craig, Lee Strobel, and Daniel B. Wallace.
All Christians, to some extent, should be apologists. Every believer should be able to present the faith logically (1 Peter 3:15;
2 Timothy 2:25). This is not to say that everyone should be an apologetics specialist, but Christians should comprehend the what,
why, and how of expressing their beliefs with others who ask. And we should know enough about the Bible to defend our faith
against atheists.
More than ever, society is questioning and opposing the Christian community. Unfortunately, the foundations of church
theology are also under attack from inside as Paul predicted in Acts 20:29-30. Some in the church twist the Scriptures to suit their
own desires, [gathering] a great number of teachers around them to say what their itching ears want to hear (2 Timothy 4:3; see
also Revelation 2:20).
The hope that we have inside us (1 Peter 3:15) is central to Christian apologetics, and Jesus is the source of that hope (see
Titus 2:13). "Whoever acknowledges me before men, I will acknowledge before my Father in heaven," Jesus says (Matthew 10:32;
also see 2 Timothy 1:8).
Though we must defend our faith with certainty and zeal, Christians must also engage in apologetics with gentleness and
respect (1 Peter 3:15). "The Lord's servant must not be a quarrelsome man, but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, and not
resentful" (2 Timothy 2:24). (Ephesians 4:15) The truth must be conveyed in love.
An apologist must love people in addition to knowing the Bible. The goal of apologetics is to lead people to a knowledge of
the truth that will set them free (John 8:32). Opponents must be gently instructed, in the hope that God will grant them repentance
leading to knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken
them captive to do his will (2 Timothy 2:25-26).
Theological Responsibility.
A successful Christian group must build a firm stance on biblical principles that extends beyond charismatic leadership. A
specific belief must be present, and everyone is directed toward sustaining the beliefs. An effective apologist makes certain that
people who have been trained have a guide to utilize as a yardstick. All precautions must be taken to ensure that there is no
deviation from the course.
Educate Yourself.
Being a Christian apologist demands knowledge of a wide range of – and frequently disparate – subjects of study. A
thorough educational foundation, preferably including a PhD, is required if you wish to be a Research Apologist.
Each facet of education is an important endeavor in its own right. A good apologist, on the other hand, will not only grasp
several sciences, but will also understand how to integrate those professions into a coherent worldview. To become a scientific
apologist, you must have a master's degree (preferably a PhD) in a scientific field (e.g., physics, astronomy, biochemistry, or
marine biology), as well as graduate-level study in theology, Bible interpretation, church history, or philosophy.
These seminars can teach you how to integrate your scientific understanding with the Bible. It's also a tremendous benefit if
Christian Apologists have also studied other disciplines. Take a language class or an art class. Read as much as you can on a
variety of topics, including classic literature. This will help you become a more well-rounded person.
Some have never worked in a secular environment and have limited experience speaking with persons of different
worldviews. As a result, they have not had the opportunity to practice defending their opinions in real-life situations.
There is no substitute for conversing face-to-face with unbelievers for a decade (or longer), receiving unpleasant feedback,
having numerous seemingly pointless conversations, and changing those "failures" into the human talents required to genuinely
love others.
You must first get field or laboratory experience if you want to work in scientific apologetics. This will allow you to
demonstrate creative problem-solving skills, a strong work ethic, and leadership talents, as well as discover new ways to
communicate your religion. The more practical experience you have as a missionary engaged in a secular sector, the more likely
you will become a credible apologist.
Character Development
As you practice your evangelism skills, you must be diligent about gaining Christian maturity (what Protestants call
"sanctification"). Christian apologists who take their time understand not only how to provide sound answers, but also how to
present them in a way that invites the other person to continue the conversation.
These are the times when you can allow the Lord to guide you deeper into your soul as you work with him to shape your
character into the image of Christ.
Winning arguments isn't nearly as important as behaving elegantly throughout a conflict such that the other side wants to
stay in your relationship. If you lose a connection because you came on too strong, use it as constructive feedback and possibly
ask forgiveness from the person. A high degree of education will not make up for a lack of grace. Another crucial character trait
for Christian apologists to strive for is the capacity to explain the opinions of others fairly and accurately. It is vital to pay close
attention. You Communicate opposing perspectives in such a way that if the person holding that opinion heard your summary,
they would say, "Yes, that's an accurate statement about what I believe." It is vital to allow for comments and correction while
presenting other people's thoughts. This is part of what senior study scholar Kenneth Samples refers to as the Apologetics Golden
Rule.
Top-tier Communication Skills Christian apologists can convey their research to others verbally and in writing. They can
communicate themselves through blogs, Facebook posts, and books, as well as deliver excellent public speeches, media
interviews, and reply to queries. Understanding how to develop and run a website, as well as how to use social media, are both
essential skills.
Communication proficiency takes time to develop. Fortunately, we live in an era where there are numerous tools and
resources available to assist people in becoming better communicators and developing their own brand. You might also volunteer
to assist others in developing their skills. When your church or workplace has a need for social media or wants to express a new
idea, it's a fantastic time to practice new abilities.
The goal of becoming a Christian apologist may appear daunting, but it is certainly doable if approached one step at a time.
In an increasingly hostile culture, the Christian community needs creative women and men to help defend the faith.
Hermeneutics is necessary when reading difficult passages, unfamiliar phrases, or challenging sayings. It can offer a new
meaning or reveal something hidden from casual Bible readers, and it can make cryptic words more meaningful. I've written a
book about hermeneutics.
The disagreement began: "After the chief priests met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of
money and told them, 'You are to say, 'His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were sleeping.'" As a
result, the soldiers accepted the money and followed orders. This story is still widely circulated among Jews today." Matt. 28:12–
15
This happened while the women who discovered the empty tomb were returning home to tell their families. The disciples
required apologetics even before they realized Jesus had been resurrected!
Consider a discourse that does not include Christian apologetics to see its significance. If you're asked why you believe in
Jesus and you respond with a blank expression and a shrug, it's hard to be confident. When you react with conviction about how
you know the Gospel story is true, people are compelled to reconsider.
This is what Jude meant when he declared in chapter 3 that he "felt compelled to write and urge you to contend for the faith
that was once for all entrusted to God's holy people." This is the greatest story ever told, and it is our responsibility to either
contend with or protect it.
It is a Part of Evangelism.
It is a component of evangelism at its core.
Apologetics, at its core, is about spreading the gospel and winning souls for Christ, not about winning arguments or engaging
in philosophical debates. Furthermore, apologetics strengthens evangelism by asking us to explain the gospel to nonbelievers,
provide a reason for believing it, and answer their questions. And, while we cannot force someone to believe, we may provide
them with enough facts to make their beliefs questionable.
If someone does not believe they need apologetics, check whether they have lately attempted evangelism.
Luke-Acts Apologetics
Luke's two volumes (his Gospel and Acts of the Apostles) are the most overtly apologetic of all New Testament literature.
Luke says in his prologue (Luke 1:1-4), that his book is based on thorough historical study and will provide a true account of
Christianity's origins. This two-part work's form and content suggest that it was produced in part as a political justification for
Paul: Acts concludes with Paul under house arrest but freely preaching in Rome, and both volumes emphasize that Jesus and the
apostles (especially Paul) were law-abiding citizens.
The motif of Jesus' resurrection as vindication, his fulfillment of Old Testament messianic prophesies, and the charismatic
manifestations on and after Pentecost are employed as cumulative evidences of Jesus' messianic lordship (Acts 2:36) and the
apostolic truth claims in Acts. Along the way, Luke uses the apostles' comments to make apologetic arguments to Jewish and
Gentile audiences both.
One of these lectures, Paul's address to the Athenians in Acts 17, has had immense influence in Christian apologetics and
throughout church history; it is the only notable example in the New Testament of an apology aimed to a non-Jewish audience
(though see Acts 14:15-17). As a result, one single speech has historically
According to Luke (Acts 17:18), Paul's message of Jesus and the Resurrection was misconstrued as teaching new deities.
This accusation is stated in Luke in terminology that is identical to that used in Plato's apologetic to describe the Athenians' charge
against Socrates, showing that Luke considered Paul's speech as a Christian counterpart to the Socratic apologetic. When Stoic
and Epicurean philosophers pushed Paul to explain his position, he put it in a rational perspective that his theoretically educated
audience could understand. The speech was very different from what Paul had previously given to Jewish audiences, in which he
emphasized Jesus as the fulfillment of Old Testament messianic promises and extensively cited Old Testament proof passages. In
truth, Paul spoke in a Greek-recognized manner.
Throughout the speech, Paul preaches biblical truth while using Stoic vocabulary and arguing in a Stoic style, even citing a
Stoic poet to back up his thesis (verses 24-29). Essentially, the goal of the first and longest section of the speech is that worship is
ridiculous, and the Stoics have admitted as much, albeit they have not completely abandoned it. Paul uses this gap in Stoic
philosophy to demonstrate the Athenians' ignorance of God (verse 23). After proving his major thesis, Paul declares that by
showing himself, God has put an end to ignorance regarding his nature and will. Paul goes on to say that the Resurrection
confirms God's determination to judge the world via Jesus Christ (verses 30-31). This infuriated the Athenians.
As a result of Paul's apologies, some believed, some mocked, and some were intrigued (verses 32-34). These remarks cover
the three conceivable reactions to the gospel, and the small number of believers should not be taken as a failure of Paul's
presentation. 1 Corinthians 2:2 does not imply that Paul abandoned philosophical reasoning (as his use of Greek logic and
eloquence in 1 Corinthians 15 reveals), but rather that he refused to avoid the core issue with the Corinthians, even though it was
scandalous to them. As a result, Christian apologists are accurate in considering Paul's speech to the Athenians to be a model of
Christian apologetics.
Martin Luther's (1483-1546) career was concentrated on the teaching of salvation by faith alone in Jesus Christ, the
Augustinian monk who sparked the Reformation with his Ninety-five Theses condemning legalistic church procedures. Luther
believed that reason, particularly as it was utilized in medieval theology, had obscured the gospel of justification. As a result, he
emphasized reason's limitations and rejected the traditional theological task of explaining and defending the Christian faith
without resort to scripture.
Following waves of Christian persecution, orthodox Christians were forced to find apologetic remedies. Theological
opinions and philosophical temperament of the apologist, as well as the content of the unbelieving attack, influenced such
responses.
Theological Accountability.
A successful Christian group needs to develop a tough stand on the biblical views that go beyond a charismatic leadership. A
definite belief must be present and all people are directed towards upholding the beliefs. An effective apologist ensures that those
that are trained are equipped with the guide with which they can use as a yardstick. All measures must be put in place to certify
that no derailment from the course is witnessed.
Start with the heart: "But honor Christ the Lord as holy in your hearts..."
When we engage in apologetics, we must keep in mind that the purpose is not to appear bright and learned, nor is it to win
intellectual debates. It is primarily focused with evangelization. Our goal in apologetics should be to honor Christ by sharing His
good news with others so that they can come to know Him. 1. Make an argument for Christ.
There are two basic approaches to Christian apologetics: classical and presuppositional apologetics.
Classical apologetics is focused with demonstrating the truth of Christianity by solid evidence, whereas presuppositional
apologetics is concerned with refuting skeptics' preconceived notions and ideas.
Both ways are correct and do not contradict each other. Here's how to prepare for them:
This includes studying the Bible using biblical hermeneutic methods, acquiring systematic and biblical theology, and
grasping essential Christian concepts like substitutionary atonement, justification, sanctification, the Trinity, and so on. Learning
them may be aided by the Westminster Confession of Faith, Westminster Shorter Catechism, and Westminster Larger Catechism.
Because not everyone will believe the Bible is true, it is also vital to study the Bible's history as well as its stories.
Similarly, we must learn to restrain our conceit (James 4:6). If you like to be the last one to speak and don't know how to
admit you don't know or can't quickly apologize. You may be unwilling to engage in apologetics. Nobody knows everything, and
it's fine if you can't answer a question. However, lying and unintentionally causing someone to trip is unacceptable. Be modest
enough to admit when you don't know something and return to the person when you do.
A summary of our God centered believe system which is in tandem with the Apostolic Doctrinal creed of the first church of
Jerusalem 33-68 AD, must be used to detect any deviation as demonstrated in the Apostles Creed
The above Apostolic doctrine was reiterated during a world council of Bishops in Nicaea, AD 325, confirmed by the first
Council of Constantinople which occurred in AD 381 in the city Constantinople, now modern Istanbul, Turkey. It was confirmed
again as authentic in the Council of Ephesus, held in AD 431.It was around 19th Century that modern theology repudiated it
through WOF postmodern positive thinking. As a result, each church now comes up with different statements of faiths and
amorphous policies and goals, contrary to the unity and oneness the Bible emphasizes (John 17:22, Acts 2: 46, Acts 4:32, Romans
12:16, Corinth 1:10, Ephesians 4:3-6,).
At our research Institute, we abhor new theological speculations like Word of Faith. That is why we are unpopular because
98% Pentecostal churches in Uganda, espouse the WOF charismatic theology.
By far one of the most grotesquely and yet brightly blazing deceptions I've ever seen, perverting Christian religion into a
crude religiosity set on personal fulfillment, not true trust in God alone but a carnal reliance upon self.
In reality, many Word of Faith (WOF) doctrines resemble the New Age best-seller book "The Secret" more than the Bible.
It's hardly a leap to replace WOF's "positive confession" with The Secret's affirmations, or the Word of Faith concept of humans
being "little gods" with the New Age concept of humans being divine.
A good apologetic ministry must begin with orthodox Christianity. An orthodox Christian faith is summarized in creeds or
confessions. The Apostles creed or the Westminster Confession give a good guide as to orthodoxy.
Any argument or contention for the Christian faith must be in line with the stated articles of confession. But more strictly, it
must be in tandem with scriptures as the supreme authority but not from extra-biblical sources.