Fracture Mechanics and Steady Load Failure Theory Summary

Fracture Mechanics and Steady
Load Failure Theory Summary
Lecture 9
Engineering 473
Machine Design
Critical Crack Size
For a given crack size, there is a corresponding

stress that will cause the crack to propagate in a
catastrophic manner.
Non-destructive Testing
Testing methods exist that can detect cracks or flaws

in metallic parts without destroying them. These
methods are called non-destructive testing (NDT).
If the flaw size can be established in a part through NDT,

and the stress state at the location of the crack is known
through analysis or test, then an analysis can be
performed to determine if the crack is close to the critical
crack size for the particular stress state.
The combination of analysis to determine the stress state

and NDT to establish the maximum flaw size are critical
components of fracture prevention programs.
Fracture Mechanics Cases
(NDT Inspected Part)
Case 1:
1 The machine element is inspected and no
cracks are found.
All Nondestructive Testing (NDT) methods have a

minimum crack size that can be detected. In this case, the
crack length is taken to be the minimum detectable crack.
K IC
σf =
Y π⋅a
Crack geometry Minimum

factor detectable
crack length
(Part has been tested)
Case 2:
2 The part is tested and does not fail under a
known load.
In this case, the crack size is assumed to be slightly

smaller than the critical crack size associated with the
stress state caused by the test load.
2
1 æ K IC ö
a = çç ÷÷
π è Yσ f ø
Possible crack size
Stress caused by the test load
(Crack is detected)
Case 3:
3 The part is inspected and a crack is found.
The size of the crack is compared to the critical crack size

obtained from the following formula. The stress used is
that to be encountered during service.
2
1 æ K IC ö
a crit = ç ÷
π è Yσ ø
Expected service stress
Stress-Corrosion Cracking
Parts subjected to continuous static loads in certain corrosive
environments may, over a period of time, develop cracks.
This plot shows a reduction in KIC

over time due to stress-corrosion.
Shigley, Fig. 5-27

Non-destructive Testing
NDT is the examination of engineering materials with
technologies that do not affect the object’s future usefulness.
Common NDT Methods

X-radiography Magnetic particle
Ultrasonic Liquid penetrant
Eddy current Acoustic emission
X-radiography
Shackelford, Fig. 8-22.

Ultrasonic Testing
Schakelford, Fig. 8-23.

Summary of Steady Load
Failure Theories
Ductile Materials Brittle Materials Fracture Mechanics

Distortion Energy Maximum Normal Linear Elastic
(von Mises) Stress Fracture Mechanics
(LEFM)
Maximum Shear Stress Internal Friction
(Tresca) (Coulomb-Mohr)
Modified Internal
Friction
When do I apply these
failure theories?
Design Governed Design Not Governed by
by Industry Industry Design
Design Standard Standard
• Follow formulas in standard. • Choose a factor of safety
that the design is to be
• Formulas can often be derived based on.
based on a knowledge of the
failure theory incorporated in • Use appropriate failure
the standard. theory during the design of
machine elements.
• Factor of safety is included in
the standard. • Compute failure margins at
all critical locations.
Flow Chart for
Typical Analysis
Norton, Fig. 5-22

Material Failure Mechanisms
Ductile fracture – failure that involves a significant amount of
plastic deformation prior to fracture
Brittle fracture – failure without a significant amount of
macroscopic plastic deformation prior to
fracture.
Fatigue failure – failure associated with slow crack growth due
to changing stress states.
Corrosion-fatigue failure – failure due the combined actions of
changing stress and corrosive environments.
Stress-corrosion cracking – failure in which a steady tensile stress
leads to the initiation and propagation of
fracture in a relatively mild chemical
environment.
(Continued)
Wear failure – broad range of relatively complex, surface-

related damage phenomena.
Liquid-erosion failure – type of wear failure in which liquid is
responsible for removal of material.
Liquid-metal embrittlement – involves the material losing some
degree of ductility below its yield strength due
to its surface being wetted by a lower-melting-
point liquid metal.
Hydrogen embrittlement – notorious cause of catastrophic failure
in high strength steels exposed to hydrogen
environment which leads to lose of ductility
(few parts per million of hydrogen is enough).
Creep and stress rupture failures – failure due to
continued strain growth under steady
load.
All of these mechanisms are associated with the

failure of the material. They do not include one
of the most important structural failure
mechanisms that must be considered in
compressive stress environments – Buckling.
Buckling
Assignment
A high - strength steel has a yield strength of 1,460 Mpa and
a K IC of 98 Mpa m . Calculate the size of a surface crack that
will lead to catastrophic failure at an applied stress of 0.5 Sy .
An NDT inspection is used that can ensure that a structural

ceramic part will have no flaws greater that 25 µm in size.
Calculate the maximum service stress that can be used.
K IC = 9 Mpa m .

Fracture Mechanics and Steady Load Failure Theory Summary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fracture Mechanics and Steady Load Failure Theory Summary

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fracture Mechanics and Steady Load Failure Theory Summary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Fracture Mechanics and Steady

Load Failure Theory Summary

For a given crack size, there is a corresponding

Testing methods exist that can detect cracks or flaws

If the flaw size can be established in a part through NDT,

The combination of analysis to determine the stress state

All Nondestructive Testing (NDT) methods have a

Crack geometry Minimum

In this case, the crack size is assumed to be slightly

The size of the crack is compared to the critical crack size

This plot shows a reduction in KIC

Shigley, Fig. 5-27

Common NDT Methods

Shackelford, Fig. 8-22.

Schakelford, Fig. 8-23.

Ductile Materials Brittle Materials Fracture Mechanics

Norton, Fig. 5-22

Wear failure – broad range of relatively complex, surface-

All of these mechanisms are associated with the

An NDT inspection is used that can ensure that a structural

You might also like